My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
2008
>
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 5:26:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:18:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/13/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />k lot z .~. ass 0 cia t e 5 <br /> <br />4.2.2 Mitigation of Channel Improvements <br /> <br />Channel improvements, such as widening, will usually result in increases in the peak <br />discharge that occurs downstream during the design flood condition because the <br />floodwaters move more effectively in the improved channel. If these increases are <br />significant, an adverse impact to the downstream regions can result. To prevent such <br />adverse impacts, mitigation of increases is required. In addition, if these increases are <br />seen at downstream points outside the City, controversy over the proposed improvements <br />might result. Consequently, construction of mitigation ponds associated with channel <br />improvements should be expected. <br /> <br />For planning purposes, mitigation ponds would be expected to be located in the <br />approximate vicinity of where the channel improvements occur. However, the mitigation <br />volume would not necessary have to be provided in a single pond, but could be divided <br />among several smaller ponds. Underground detention might in part be used to provide <br />some of the required mitigation (though typically, underground detention is more <br />expensive than surface detention unless land acquisition costs for surface detention are <br />quite high and the surface above the underground detention can be used for high-valued <br />purposes; such alternatives could be examined in detailed design). <br /> <br />For planning purposes, the required mitigation volume is estimated as the volume of <br />excavation needed to construct the channel capacity improvement. Construction of <br />mitigation will introduce additional cost for channel capacity improvement. Locations <br />where mitigation ponds (or detention or diversion ponds might be located) are discussed <br />below in regard to regional detention issues. <br /> <br />4-6 <br /> <br />Klotz Associates Project No. 0127.008.000 <br />January 2009 <br /> <br />La Porte Citywide Drainage Study <br />City of La Porte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.