My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
2008
>
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 5:26:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:18:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/13/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />k lot z .~. ass 0 C I ate 5 <br /> <br />the appropriate design frequency for the sewer system; 2) the inclusion of sheet flow <br />relief paths to address storm events in excess of the design capacity, and 3) the capacity, <br />spacing, and size of inlets. Temporary reduction in street inlet capacity due to inlet <br />clogging by debris is often a root cause of localized flooding. Frequent removal of trash <br />and debris from streets can be a key element in maintaining the capacity of stonn sewer <br />systems. <br /> <br />5.2.7.5 Minimal Detention Levels and Numbers of Detention Sites <br /> <br />The detention requirements identified for mitigation of proposed improvements, <br />diversion of flood waters, and storage for regional detention are estimated minimal <br />detention amounts to accomplish the intended purpose of the detention. Actual detention <br />volumes will be somewhat in excess of these amounts in order to provide potential <br />freeboard; estimated land acquisition for the pond will require inclusion of land for <br />surrounding maintenance berms and inlet and outlet structures. Detailed engineering of <br />the detention system in question will be necessary to refine these features. <br /> <br />One of the key issues in providing the required detention will be determination of <br />whether one site or more than one site will be used to meet detention requirements. <br />Detention does not necessarily have to always be provided by a pond at one site only. <br />The present CWDS report identifies, based upon apparent availability of open land, <br />potential detention sites. Detailed engineering can evaluate the feasibility of using one or <br />multiple sites for meeting detention requirements. <br /> <br />5.2.7.6 Enforcement of Drainage Criteria <br /> <br />Drainage criteria as defined by City policy should be rigorously enforced. Letter Report <br />No. 2 recommended certain modifications to the City's drainage criteria manual. <br />Irrespective of whether these recommendations are adopted, the criteria in the drainage <br /> <br />5-13 <br /> <br />Klotz Associates Project No. 0127.008.000 <br />January 2009 <br /> <br />La Porte Cilywide Drainage Study <br />City of La Porte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.