My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Drainage and Flooding Report January 2009
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
Drainage and Flooding Reports
>
Drainage and Flooding Report January 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 8:49:18 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:19:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Reports and Studies
Date
1/1/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iotz 11.41 associates <br />would be either at one of the two sites, or, possibly smaller ponds would be used at each of the <br />optional sites. Detailed engineering analyses would be required to identify the optimal number, <br />configuration and sizes of individual ponds. In all situations, the pond configurations, locations, <br />and sizes shown are only approximate. <br />In special situations, mitigation may be avoided if it can be demonstrated that adverse impacts or <br />are absent or of very little consequence. An example of this possibility is provided by the <br />improvements for Ditch F216-01-00, for which three alternatives have proposed (Projects 26, 28, <br />and 30 in Table ES-1). Project Options 26 and 28 include a mitigation pond; however; the <br />channel improvement extends to the confluence of F216-01-00 and F216-00=00, which lies quite <br />close to Galveston Bay. Thus locations downstream of the channel improvements' potential <br />impacts are quite limited in extent, and because of the relatively large flows that occur in F216- <br />00-00, the increases in flow due to improvements along F216-01-00 may be so small, in a <br />relative sense, that they are inconsequential. Hence, mitigation of the channel improvement may <br />be unnecessary. Detailed engineering analysis would be required to confirm this speculation. <br />It is recognized that using channel lining to improve channel conveyance capacity is not <br />desirable from an environmental or permitting perspective. On the other hand, widening of the <br />channel with 3:1 or flatter side slopes will often result in a channel width that will significantly <br />impact adjacent properties, including in some instances actual residences and consequent <br />requirements for possible buy-out of affected residences. <br />Therefore, the option of off -channel diversion detention storage is sometimes considered. Table <br />ES-1 identifies proposed detention ponds for diversion use while Figures ES=1 through ES=6 <br />show approximate locations of the diversion ponds. Pond configurations, locations, and sizes <br />shown are only approximate. When optional locations are available for a mitigation pond, the <br />optional locations are shown. <br />EN <br />Klotz Associates Project No. 0127.008,000 La Forte Citywide [drainage Study <br />January 2009 City of La Porte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.