Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />4 <br />LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORIY <br />- - f!,~~~ - - - <br />Questionnaire Completed by the Auditors ~~ ~- • • -• ..- ' ~ ,~' <br />9. The water district's taxes were collected by an employee of the district <br />10. Was the tax assessor-collector bonded as required by law? <br />1 L What was: <br />a. The tax assessor-collector bonded for? <br />b. The greatest amount of the district's taxes in the tax assessor- <br />collector'spossession at any one time? <br />c. The frequency of tax receipts deposits with the bonded <br />depository? (check one) <br />(1) Daily <br />(2) Weekly <br />(3) Monthly <br />12. We (check one): <br />a. Actually examined the records of the tax assessor-collector. <br />b . Received written confirmation for tax data from the tax <br />assessor-collector. <br />c. Accepted tax data furnished by the district's administrative offices. <br />13. Were local tax revenues (including delinquent taxes, and interest and <br />penalties on taxes) properly separated for debt service? <br />N/A <br />Yes No <br />N/A <br />Yes No <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />Yes No <br />14. Was the water district in compliance with applicable bond resolutions, <br />with the general or special legislation under which the district was <br />created and with the specific statutes excerpted and included in the <br />Legal Compliance Guidelines in Section 70-03-1 of--the Water <br />District Accounting Manual? - <br />Yes No <br />* Nothing came to our attention during the course of our examination <br />which indicated that the resolutions and laws were not being observed. <br />See accompanying letter dated December 21, 1990. <br />(Continued) <br />