My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-05-07 Meeting of the La Porte Redevelopment Authority minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
LP Redevelopment Authority
>
2000's
>
2007
>
12-05-07 Meeting of the La Porte Redevelopment Authority minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 4:29:09 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:25:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
La Porte Redevelopment Authority/TIRZ
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/5/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Feb. 19. 2008 4:26PM City of La Porte <br /> <br />No. 2976 P. 10 <br />Page 1 of3 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Black, Gretchen <br /> <br />From: Barr, Stephen <br />Sent: Wednesday, January 23,20085:04 PM <br />To: Black, Gretchen; Porter, Alton; Joems. John <br />Co: Bottoms, Ron' <br />Subject: RE: Beach Renourishment Project Reminder . <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Hello All <br /> <br />The program that we asked Judge Emmett to help us with funding from, Is the Harris County <br />share of the federal Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP) that is administered <br />through the Texas General Land Office. <br /> <br />Our offldal project name is the Sylvan Beach Shoreline PrDtection and Beach <br />Nourishment PTDJect . Our current funding is through the Coastal Erosion Planning and <br />'Response Act (CEPRA), a state program also administered through the Texas General Land <br />Office. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />We had asked Judge Emmett to fund the entire $2.6 million that is the engineer's estimate for <br />this project. CEPRA is funding, with our share, $2.5 million. What we need from the CIAP <br />funds are the difference, plus the City and County shares, which would total $300 thousand <br />shortfall shown above, and the $1.125 Miilion City/County match. So,' instead of $2.8 million, <br />we only need approximately $1.5 million. We may need another $300 thousand for amenities <br />that were not induded in the original scope (I.e. lighting, decorative banners, etc.). We would <br />be really happy with $1.8 !TIillion, . <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Hope this answers everyone's questions, and good luck with the judge. He was very receptive <br />to the idea of actually spending "coastal impact assistance" funds for coastal impact <br />assistance, instead of air quality studies... <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Stephen <br />-Original Message--- <br />From: Black, Gretchen <br />~nt: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1:31 PM <br />To: Porter, Alton; Joems, John <br />Cc: Barr, Stephen; Bottoms, Ron <br />Subject: RE: Beach Renourishment PrOject Reminder <br /> <br />stephen as we discussed please respond and cc to all. Many thanks. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Gretchen Black <br />Economic Development Coordinator <br />City of La Porte, Texas <br />Office of the City Manager <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I <br />- <br /> <br />1 n4nnnfl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.