My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
05-27-09 Meeting of the La Porte Redevelopment Authority Minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
LP Redevelopment Authority
>
2000's
>
2009
>
05-27-09 Meeting of the La Porte Redevelopment Authority Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 4:29:09 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:25:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
La Porte Redevelopment Authority/TIRZ
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />haynesboone <br /> <br />July 17, 2009 <br /> <br />1 R'H'.r-.,H' <br />.i'-J ~-._IVE.D <br />I <br />i JUl 2 0 2009 <br />BY:_ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Craig Olivier <br />ArrORNEY AT LAW <br />1414 W. Clay <br />Houston, Texas 77019 <br /> <br />Via CMRRR <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Re: No. 2008-59553; LaPorte 81, Ltd., et al. v. National Property Holdings, L.P.. et at.; In <br />the 11 th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Olivier: <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />We have received the corrected tax bills from the City of La Porte and Harris County, which now <br />reflect the rollback taxes owed for 2001 and 2002. The tax bills are enclosed for your reference. <br />Looking at the tax bills, your client's claims, and the facts in this case, it seems that the parties <br />should be able to resolve this matter without the need for further Court action. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />As you know, your client seeks to recover $116,455.62, which it claims to be the difference <br />between the credit it gave at closing and rollback taxes that were previously billed (incorrectly) <br />to reflect only a portion of the total tax liability. The corrected tax bills show that an additional <br />$109,697.52 is owed to the taxing authorities. Because the taxing authorities reasonably appear <br />to have a superior claim to the $109,697.52, National Property Holdings, L.P. ("NPH") intends <br />to pay that amount to the taxing authorities. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />This means that the difference between the closing credit and the total rollback taxes is <br />$6,758.10. NPH intends to apply this amount to the legal fees that your client has caused it to <br />incur as a result of this lawsuit. Texas law allows an interpleading party to recover attorneys' <br />fees as costs from the claimant whose unsuccessful claim rendered the interpleader necessary. <br />See Beneficial Standard Life Ins., Co. v. Trinity Nat'l Bank, 763 S.W.2d 52, 56 (Tex. App.- <br />Dallas 1988, writ denied). As you might expect, NPH has incurred much more than $6,758.10 in <br />attorneys' fees as a result of your client's lawsuit. Yet NPH will forbear recovery of its <br />remaining attorneys' fees provided that your client dismisses its lawsuit with prejudice upon <br />NPH's payment of the taxes to the taxing authorities. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Please let us know by Friday, July 24, 2009, if your client will dismiss its lawsuit. We look <br />forward to resolving this matter without the necessity of the Court's intervention. <br /> <br />Haynes and Boone, UP_ <br />Allomeys and Counselors <br />One f-Iou$1on Center <br />1221 ""kKinneyStreet, Suile 2100 <br />Housbn, Texas 77010-2007 _ <br />Phone: 713.547.2000 <br />Fax: 713.547.2600 <br />www.haynasboone.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.