My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1985
>
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:26:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/15/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairman Wilson and tiers of the Commission <br />' City of LaPorte ~ Page 11 <br />stored material above that fence should be deleted. This <br />. requirement was intended to screen stored materials from rights- <br />of-way and public view. Such screening would prevent the visa- <br />bility of large unsightly stored items. On the other hand, it <br />makes it increasingly difficult for commercial contractors to <br />store large equipment such as cranes, back-hoes, etc. and have <br />them screened effectively. It is a goal of the Comprehensive <br />Plan to improve the overall image and appearance of the community. <br />The screening and setback requirements in this section further <br />that objective. <br />ANALYSIS: Planning and Zonin <br />goals of the comprehensive plan <br />aspects of the application of <br />therefrom. <br />• <br />19) Section 8-200: <br />g should carefully consider the <br />for screening versus the pratical <br />this section and make a decision <br />Citizen comment indicates that clarification is necessary on <br />which rules apply to a P. U. D. District and which rules apply to <br />a P. U. D. developed within a residential, commercial or industrial <br />district. Due to the complexity of planned unit developments <br />in general, the regulations concerning planned unit development <br />with in the ordinance are quite detailed and specific. Carefull <br />study is indicated in order to ascertain the differences between <br />which rules apply to a P. U. D. District and which rules apply <br />a P. U. D. within a residential, commercial or industrial distri- <br />ction. In Section 8-200, It is indicated that in land zone P. <br />U. D. on the zoning map, all uses that are permitted in the <br />residential, commercial, and industrial districts are permitted <br />in that P. U. D. zone. This is different from material covered <br />in Article" 10, which relates to a Planned unit development <br />within a residential, commercial or industrial district in <br />which the allowable use would be limited to the allowable uses <br />within the particular residential, commercial, or industrial <br />district. <br />20) Section 8-402 (8): <br />Citizen comment indicates that this section needs to state the <br />dwelling unit per acre requirments for a P. U. D. District. <br />The Section in this case is clear that dwelling unit density <br />requirements within a P. U. D. Zone for each particular use are <br />to be in general complaince with the applicable district provi- <br />sions. Therefore, density for the residential portion of the <br />P. U. D. or commercial portion of a P. U. D. etc. shall be <br />identical to the residential density in a regular residential <br />district, or a commercial density in a commercial district. <br />Provided, however that in Section 10-103 of the Zoning Ordinance, <br />a density bonus is allowed and enables developers in either a <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.