08-15-1985 Public Hearing - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Chairman Wilson an embers of the Commission City of LaPorte ~ Page 14 ANALYSIS: Do not change this section, but perhaps make a clear reference to the Development Ordinance sections that apply. 24) Section 10-101 (4): Citizen comment indicates that this section, which again deals with construction schedules for multistage planned unit develop- ments should be approximate only and used as a general guideline, as opposed to being a concrete start and end date. The intent of the section is to provide only approximate starting dates and completion dates, and to the extent that the section mandates definite starting and completion dates of construction, the wording should be changed to give general guideline dates. ANALYSIS: In the last sentence of Section 10-101(4), the word "approximate" should be inserted before starting date and comple- tion date- of the complete development plan. 25) Section 10-101 6(C): Citizen comment indicates that the term "sufficient amount of usuable open space" in this section is somewhat vague. This is the section that outlines the basic requirements that a P. U. D. must meet in order to gain its conditional use permit. As with other sections in the P. U. D. area the term "sufficient" is used to allow the developer to have increased flexibility which is one of the basic advantag es in developing a P. U. D. Note that in other areas of this section the quote is made that the P. U. D. should be in substantial complaince with the regulation of the uses that will be developed within the parameters of the P. U. D. The intent of the Plan was that sufficient in this usage should correlate with the open space requirements for the particular uses that will be developed within the planned unit development. This section is nonspecif is in order to allow flexability to the developer in the design of a planned unit development. Any amendment to this section that would define "sufficient amount of open space" would remove flexibility from the planned unit development procedures. ANALYSIS: Leave this section this section that relates the general compliance with the elsewhere in the ordinance. as is or add a qualification to term "sufficient open space" to open space requirements outlined 26) Section 10-102 (e) Citizen comment indiates that there is no need for the review of deed restrictions by the City Attorney to insure that they comply with F. H. A. Deed Restrictions. The review of these deed restrictions by the City Attorney is needed to insure compliance with both the F. H. A. Requirements and deed restriction require- ments as they may appear elsewhere in this document. As deed • • •