My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
11-17-1988 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1988
>
11-17-1988 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:26:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/17/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />t. <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />, <br /> <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />LA PORTE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <br />PAGE 4 <br /> <br />Janet Wahrlich explained that there is a list of six (6) <br />d iff ere n t thin g s t hat a nap p 1 i can t has top r e par e and h a v e <br />approved under Business Industrial, and under Light <br />Industrial there vlere none. David explained that the city <br />was looking at Business Industrial as a much higher quality <br />industrial and "yes" there are some steps there that are not <br />required. <br /> <br />Doug Latimer explained that the staff had prepared a map and <br />had Randy Walters, a land planner with Vernon Henry & <br />Associates, came out Tuesday. Much time was spent - and gone <br />over since the last meeting. <br /> <br />One of the concepts among all things is "buffering". The <br />Business Industrial Park is considered a buffer to <br />Residential as versus light Industrial. Another part of the <br />ordinance that is going to effect the zones, is a part of the <br />ordinance that is already passed that calls for special <br />circumstances when you go up against Residential. <br /> <br />John Armstrong explained that when a Commercial or Industrial <br />abuts a residential zone for use, there are increased setback <br />requirements. Many instances there has to be screening. In <br />terms of the concept of buffering itself, what we are trying <br />to do is to attempt to maintain the integrity of districts so <br />that both districts will develop as fully as possible without <br />adjoining districts adversely impacting one upon the other. <br />Obviously an Industrial District or even a business use that <br />is heavy that abuts Residential could make Residential <br />prope rty undevelopa bl e. The Commerc ia 1 a t some po int and <br />time, the two have to meet. Thus, we have to find out about <br />land in La Porte. We don't have any major natural features <br />that would provide natural buffer, so - in a heavy industrial <br />type of use, if Residential is zoned too close to that, you <br />might prohibit or inhibit the development of industrial <br />property due to its' proximity Reside~tial. Examples of this <br />is PPG and the Southern Pacific property. In both cases, <br />what we've done and this is something that the planners did <br />not do, when you have those heavy industrial uses, we've gone <br />next door to a light industrial or a compatible use, then to <br />a business industrial, then to a Residential or Commercial as <br />a pattern, then by doing that hopefully without question the <br />property will all develop according to its potential with no <br />inhibition between the highly residential areas of Fairmont, <br /> <br />EXHIBIT F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.