Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STAFF REPORT 12/12/91 <br />SPENWICK PLACE <br />SECTION ONE <br /> <br />Item No. VI on the agenda is to consider a replat of Lots 111, 112, & 113 in Block 7, <br />Spenwick Place Section One. This subdivision was platted in March of 1953 and was part <br />of the Collegeview M.U.D. at that time. It was annexed by the City of La Porte in 1984. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />The owner has proposed the replat in order to move an existing <br />easement from the center of the lots to one side, allowing for <br />development on all three lots (see attached replat and letter of <br />request). <br /> <br />The City's Development Ordinance No. 1444 and state law allows for <br />a replat or re-subdivision of a recorded subdivision plat, or a portion <br />thereof, but without vacation of the immediate previous plat, is hereby <br />expressly authorized to be recorded and shall be deemed valid and <br />controlling when: <br /> <br />A. It has been signed and acknowledged by only the owners of <br />the particular property which is being replatted or <br />resubdivided. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />B. It does not attempt to alter, amend or remove any covenants <br />and restrictions. <br /> <br />C. There is compliance, when applicable, with Section 212.014 <br />and 212.015 of V.T.C.A. local government codes. <br /> <br />D. It has been approved by the Commission after being prepared <br />and filed as though it were an original plat as specified in <br />Section 4.04 of the Ordinance; and <br /> <br />E. All expenses incurred by the City or the subdivider in the <br />Replat process shall be borne by the subdivider, including <br />costs of notice of public hearing. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Notifications and advertisement of the mandatory public hearing were <br />complied with on December 4, 1991. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Staff researched the easement and found that no public utilities <br />existed. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Staff contacted franchised utility companies and found they have no <br />objection to abandonment of the easement or relocation (letters <br />attached) . <br />