Laserfiche WebLink
• The replat document should identify Ordinance #96-2137, which closes the alley <br />in Block 133, while retaining a 16 foot easement for utilities. The easement <br />dedication language should be noted on the Replat document. <br />Development Ordinance No. 1444 establishes clear options and actions for the <br />Commission to undertake when considering a Replat. They are as follows: <br />1. A rove the Replat as filed; <br />2. Disapprove the Replat as filed, provided the reasons for such <br />disapproval are stated in writing and a copy of the statement is <br />signed by the Chairman of the Planning Commission. <br />Commission action shall be noted on three (3) copies of the <br />Replat, which shall be distributed to the developer, Department, <br />and official files of the Commission. <br />Final Plats: Effect of Approval <br />1. Ap royal of a Replat as filed and all accompanying documentation <br />by the Commission, together with approval of Public Improvement <br />Construction Documents by the Director shall result in issuance of <br />a Development Authorization by the Department which permits the <br />developer to begin construction of subdivision improvements. Not <br />applicable in this case because it does not involve construction at <br />this time. <br />2. Disapproval of a Replat requires filing of a new Replat. <br />The City has no objection to approving the Replat subject to the following conditions: <br />1) The public hearing cost of $50.07 is paid by the applicant. <br />2) Ordinance #96-2137, approved by City Council on September 23, 1996, is shown <br />on the Replat as the document that closed the alley in Block 133 and retained the <br />16 foot utility easement. <br />