My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-20-1997 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1997
>
02-20-1997 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:35 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:28:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/20/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff Report Driveway Standards March 20, 1997 <br />The City's driveway standazds are contained in Zoning Ordinance #1501, Sect. 10-605. These <br />standards include regulations regazding: <br />• materials <br />• size <br />• location <br />In staff's opinion, the standards were reasonable and workable when adopted. However, citizen <br />concerns have created the need for some additional clazification. An issue in which there does <br />appeaz to be a need for more stringent regulation is that of acceptable pazking and driveway <br />dust-free materials. Presently, the Zoning Ordinance identifies the materials suitable to control <br />dust and drainage as: concrete, asphalt, recycled asphalt, or other materials if approved by the <br />City Engineer. The current wording has resulted in field situations for staff. The pazking and <br />driveway azea is normally installed near the end of a construction job. Construction costs <br />always run over initial estimates which in turn results in limited funds for the pazking and <br />driveway areas. The recycled asphalt and other materials can create undesirable surfaces unless <br />an a proper base is provided, adequate amount of surface material is used and the proper <br />installation equipment is used. Recently materials the owner feels is acceptable as "dust-free" <br />has not been acceptable to the City. The City's policy is to hold utilities to the new structure <br />until an acceptable dust-free surface has been provided. Staff finds that owners of the house <br />tend to move in as soon as utilities allow. When this occurs, the City will often have to take <br />formal action to obtain the required dust-free parking and driveways which have been required <br />as part of the job. To avoid the need for this type of action, utilities aze held until proper <br />surfaces are provided. <br />A second issue that needs to be addressed deals with the portion of the driveway between the <br />property line and the tie-in at the street. Since this part of the driveway is over the street right- <br />of-way, some individuals want to install rock, gravel or other unacceptable materials. <br />Individuals have asked to see a written requirement that states this portion must be dust-free as <br />well. The City's policy has been that the right-of--way portion of the driveway must be properly <br />developed at the same time as the remainder of the driveway. Staff feels this is considered as <br />part of standard development. <br />The third issue deals with large lot residential property. Many individuals who own acreage <br />choose to place their home further back on the property. This means that the driveway they <br />develop is often 4 to 6 times longer than driveways in other azeas of town. The cost of a long <br />driveway can be more expensive. <br />Possible alternatives are as follows: <br />• Define "dust-free" as concrete or asphalt. <br />a) Provide specifications for concrete driveways <br />b) Provide specifications for asphalt driveways <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.