My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
03-19-1998 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1998
>
03-19-1998 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 2:53:06 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:28:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/19/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff Report Pecan Crossing, Section III April 16,1998 <br />Preliminary -.Plat <br />Pecan Crossing is a residential subdivision located on the north side of Fairmont Parkway, <br />approximately 1,800 feet west of Underwood Road. A General Plan of the subdivision was <br />approved by the Commission on February 17, 1994. (See Map Exhibit A). Section III, which is <br />being considered for preliminary plat approval at this time, is a forty-six (46) lot section of the <br />overall subdivision. <br />Referring to Appendix D of Development Ordinance No. 1444, Staff has reviewed the Preliminary <br />Plat (See Map Exhibit B) and found it to be deficient in areas. A checklist detailing the items <br />reviewed is attached and follows this report. <br />An additional consideration is maintenance access to the subdivision's detention pond. The original <br />submittal for the Preliminary Plat of Section I included a reserve dedicated to use as a private <br />subdivision recreational area. This area was subsequently reconfigured as two lots for additional <br />homesites. This eliminated the original maintenance access path to Spring Gully and the detention <br />pond. This access is important for two reasons: <br />Unless an additional easement is dedicated by a subsequent section plat, the Spring <br />Gully drainage right-of-way will provide the only access to the subdivision's <br />detention pond. <br />In the future, the Spring Gully right-of-way may be included in a proposed system <br />of pedestrian paths that will connect various recreational facilities. <br />While these issues do not necessarily need resolution in conjunction with the Section III approval, <br />they will ultimately need to be addressed. Staff feels this is an appropriate time to address this <br />matter. Staffs recommendation is to obtain a fifteen foot (15') right-of-way designated for access <br />and maintenance of the detention pond and the fifteen foot (15') public drainage easement. This <br />could be done as part of Section IV and in alignment with the Choctaw Drive street right-of-way. <br />Finally, staff would note that Section 5.02 of the Development Ordinance empowers the <br />Commission to require pedestrian sidewalks when it feels their inclusion will serve the public <br />interest. Staff would recommend the inclusion of sidewalks within the Pecan Crossing Subdivision. <br />Responsibility for construction of the walks should be specified by covenant. <br />Development Ordinance, Section 4.03.B requires that "following review of the Preliminary Plat, <br />the Commission shall ... take one of the following actions." <br />1. Approve the Preliminary Plat as filed; <br />2. Conditionally approve the Preliminary Plat as filed, provided, the reasons are stated <br />in writing and a copy of the statement is signed by the Chairman of the Planning <br />Commission. <br />3. Disapprove the Preliminary Plat as filed, provided, the reasons for such disapproval <br />are stated in writing and a copy of the statement is signed by the Chairman of the <br />Planning Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.