My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-17-2000 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
2000's
>
2000
>
08-17-2000 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:34 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:28:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/17/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Open House Public Comment <br />La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br />more traffic will increase the danger to these pedestrians and residents of this community. I <br />see no real benefit to putting the road through - just a ''waste'' of money to please a few <br />"outsiders". Call me and I can give you more input on this quality of life now and what will <br />happen if Lomax is "cut up" needlessly. Thank you. Ronda Lunsford, 10280 North H, La <br />Porte, 281-471-2024, 713-844-2347. <br />14) CONCERN: Safety of Farrington Blvd. Regarding excessive auto/truck traffic if allowed to <br />be a major thoroughfare between Fairmont Parkway and the Lomax area. <br />OBJECTIONS: <br />a. Proximity of school zone with attendant Foot and bicycle travel by students. <br />b. Fairmont Park. recreation ball diamonds, soccer field, etc. with heavy parking at curbside <br />on Farrington Blvd. with foot traffic across Farrington Blvd. <br />c. Narrow street without adequate right-of-way for proper widening. <br />d. Lowering of property values in proximity of a major traffic artery. <br />e. More suitable alternatives exist and must be considered. Gideon Jones, 10403 Quiet <br />Hill, La Porte, TX 77571, Phone 281-487-4287 <br />15) I am opposed to making H Street a secondary arterial. This is a neighborhood - larger lots <br />don't want through traffic. I/we don't want bridge put in on H Street. I like the neighborhood <br />traffic as is. Clarence Morgan. <br />16) Lomax does not need H. St. connected to Underwood, nor do we need Farrington <br />connected to Lomax School Rd., nor do we need N. H Street connected to Barbour's Cut. <br />This is an agricultural area where people have moved to for many reasons. (a) We want our <br />space and the right for our children not to worry about walking on sidewalks down the street <br />and having to worry about speeding traffic. Our children walk their animals down our streets <br />and if you do this construction, their safety will be drastically reduced. As far as the fire and <br />police, we already have a fire station and police do not have any problems now that I have <br />seen. We also do not need a bridge over the drainage ditch. We are on a less traveled <br />road now than L St. and P St. and that is why we bought on H St. If you open that up, you <br />will double the traffic on N. H. Lori Druelanbredt <br />17)1 PROTEST CITY COUNCIL AND OUR REPRESENTATIVES' ILLEGAL ACTIVITYI No <br />road connecting Farrington to N. H. St. This is a rural neighborhood community with lots of <br />children and livestock and the Lomax residents enjoy use of this road for riding, exercising, <br />FFA events, etc. This proposed cut-through the City is trying to push through is illegal. It is <br />clearly against FAA regulations, and airport transportation regulations. The City is highly <br />aware of this and is trying to circumvent the rules underhandedly. Clearly there is an ulterior <br />motive for all this skullduggery. The people of Lomax have protested this for years. This is <br />unnecessary use of our tax powers. The city is feverishly trying to find reasons to justify this <br />road. Something stinks! ALSO - NO bridge connecting subdivision to N. H St. this is also <br />totally unnecessary and will only provide non-Lomax residents a means to cut through our <br />rural neighborhood and run it!! We are not a highway but a way of life in Lomax!! Stop <br />ignoring the deepest wishes of the people you are supposed to represent. - <br /> <br />18) I am "STRONGLY" opposed to connecting Lomax School Road to Farrington. This issue <br />has been opposed by the neighborhood. Our opposition has been expressed verbally to <br />City Council and in writing and before the steering committee. Traffic is heavy and fast <br />already. If you turn Lomax School Rd. into a connecting thoroughfare and/or a 4-lane road, <br />it will be impossible to get in and out of our driveways and become "very" dangerous for our <br />children and livestock. When you connect H St. through to Underwood, you compound the <br />traffic and safety issues for all of us that live there. These are large lots and there are <br />MANY horse ranches and people with livestock. These people are Shuttling horses and <br />livestock on foot and in large trailers at all hours of the day and night. This will be a <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.