My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
03-29-2004 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
2000's
>
2004
>
03-29-2004 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 2:57:57 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:29:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/29/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff Report Underwood Self -Storage April 15, 2004 <br />Special Conditional Use Permit #SCU04-004 <br />Requested by: Lloyd & Linda Duncan <br />Requested for: A 4.00 tract -out of lot 10, block 2, of the W. I Payne Subdivision, La Porte, <br />. Harris County, Texas. <br />Location: 2619 Underwood Road <br />Zonin : General Commercial (GC) <br />Proposed Use: - Mini -storage & warehousing <br />Backeround: <br />Analysis: <br />The applicant is proposing a mini-storagetwarehousing facility just north . <br />of Underwood Plaza, south of an undeveloped tract with a restaurant, east <br />of Underwood Road, and west of the Creekmont Subdivision and. Church. <br />property. The Exxon/Mobil Pipeline runs diagonally through the whole <br />undeveloped property along Underwood Road. The property is zoned <br />General " Commercial (GC). Mini -Storage warehousing (SIC #4225) is <br />classified as a Conditional Use in GC zone. <br />Staff reviewed this request using the Code of Ordinances Sections 106-216, <br />106-217, and all applicable elements of the La Porte Comprehensive Plan as <br />a guide. Considerations were given to the following issues: <br />• Character of the surrounding- and adjacent properties; <br />• Existing use of nearby properties, and the- extentto which a land. use <br />classification would - be in harmony with such existing uses or the <br />anticipated use of the properties; <br />• Suitability of the property for the uses to which.would be permissible; <br />considering density, access and circulation, adequacy of public facilities <br />and services, and other considerations; <br />• Extent to which the designated use of the property would harm the value <br />of adjacent land uses; <br />• Extern to which the proposed use designation would adversely affect the <br />capacity or safety of that portion of road network influenced by the, use; <br />• Extern to which. the proposed use designation would permit excessive. <br />air, water "or noise pollution, or other environmental harm on adjacent . <br />.land use designations; and, <br />• . The gain,, if any, to the public health, safety, and welfare due- to the. <br />existence of the land use designation. , <br />Land- Use — The City's Comprehensive Plan shows this area .developing <br />with commercial uses. The existing land uses are primarily retail commercial <br />(grocery store, restaurants, drug store, beauty shop, insurance company, and <br />other miscellaneous shops). There are single-family residences just east of <br />the proposed project.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.