Laserfiche WebLink
_ FROM Northrup Associates In~ PHONE N0. 713 463 5039 • Aug. 03 2004 03:36PM P4 <br />I have earlier advised the client tLat it is imperative that he seek a commitment from a <br />specific developer or builder(s) as quicldy as possible so that speck conditions may be <br />addressed at this time, without need fqr further modification. Also, the client needs to <br />versify the potential involvement of 'Harris County in the area to be preserved sad <br />enhanced. That needs to be clear in the modification. Y can assist with that, also <br />BurcAfeld/La Porte Project -2- <br />June 3, 2004 <br />The matter of fllood plain was also discussed. Alicia commented that the latest information <br />obtained from ~'EMA data i~ndicsites the entire tract is in the 100-year flood plain, which <br />means (tv the Corps) that the impacts within the site may be more severe, and wiU need to <br />be addressed in the modification. Kenny was very specific that the "permit was still valid <br />until 12/i15, but its conditions speak for themselves..." In other words, he implied that <br />greater impacts will have to be reviewed along with the new features of a plan (yet to be <br />developed) and would be revimv accordingly by the Corps. <br />It is obvious to me that the applicant must continue to address drainage, fill, and other <br />infrastructure and use issues for this project. Tht City needs to be apprized,of the position <br />of the Corps and the need for straightforward responses to these issues. Stick by my <br />recommendation that use needs mast be based on those of a specific, acceptable aaer such <br />as a builder yr third party developer Therefore, the project engineer can design <br />accordingly as to the impacts and we ran deal with budding products acceptable to the city. <br />Today, from what I have been told the apartment market is liorriblG Likewise, the all <br />cities hate therm. That was obvious at the City Council meeting where this project was <br />rascally rejected. Io deciding tht fate of the abandoned apartment project that was the <br />agenda item that preceded the subject, City Council also decided the client's fate, in my <br />opiwion. We are dealing with ahigh-profele site with too many units, in a community that <br />has only recently experienced a very bad situation dealing with abandoned apartments. <br />In a positive vein, however, the unique environmental natert of the site olf'ers other aimibur <br />use options possibly with lesser prejudice. Those worth considering indude condominiuar- <br />type residential, a townhome project far which there is a good market, a weU-managed <br />retirement complex such as those owned by MetraNational, or acompatibly-arranged <br />combination of any 4f these three uses. <br />In the neat day or two, I will put together an eaawpk or two along with the names of a few <br />people that might be worth discussing the matter with. Xf we are collectively successful in <br />resolving these issue with the city, seemly and the Corps, it u possible tfiat toe project <br />coald be target-marketed to the environmental community with the preserve as a focal <br />point. Hesston bas one of the largest, most active and vocal of such communities in the <br />country. We also enjoy close prozimity to Galveston Bay, and its wastal marshes, binding <br />there, on Galveston Island, and on Bolivar Peninsula. Twist a year, over 10,000 birders <br />