Laserfiche WebLink
• i <br />Preserve at Taylor Bayou <br />. _ <br />September 16, 2004. <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />The Staff analysis for this project uses. Chapter 106, Zoning Ordinance <br />guidelines for comparing standards. The Commission isreminded that.". <br />in a PUD, it may vary from strict terms of the. Code of Ordinances. <br />. <br />: The current application submits a. General Plan for:. <br />• .180 Multi -Family units and 1507ownhome units on 28.43 acres <br />• 1 lot,.Neighborhood Commercial on 1.35 acres <br />. 1 lot, Private Park on 2.25 acres . <br />• 1 lot, Nature Preserve on 75.16 acres. <br />• The apartment density is'. 13.85 units' per. acre (14 allowed"Per. . . <br />. <br />Chapter 106). <br />• The townhome density is 9.72 per acre (10 allowed per Chapter. 106).' <br />Development in a PUD' zoning district requires. -that a General Plan (for the - <br />.:.entire <br />proposed project) and. a Special Conditional Use Permit. (SCUP) be <br />submitted and processed simultaneously. Upon:approval of the General Plan <br />:.:and= <br />SCUP by City. Council, the applicant would be authorized to: proceed . '. <br />_-_,1"m ;;tl a platting and'development plans for the site: : " <br />Ank►sis. <br />Section 106-659 of the Code of Ordinances establishes the following <br />criteria. for. review,of development projects within a PUD zoning district;,'.. : - <br />v.yTi•,•;;n "''�='F.::..!•i�y:_ _ '_ .ism.-x .-;;:Z%ia`.'' <br />r <br />Uses: —Review of .the City's Land Use Plan indicates this 107-acre.. <br />. area was'envisioried as developing as low density residential with- <br />- - <br />• :small : 'comer for commercial uses.: However, this proposed' <br />development is not -considered to be low -density residential. In. <br />addition, Mr. Burchfield stated that the 77.5 'acre Conservation <br />Easement would serve as: a buffer between. their proposed development <br />and surrounding properties. <br />Streets`— The proposed development is located at.the corner of 91H146 <br />and McCabe . Road' The developer is proposing two points. of <br />entrance/exit off McCabe Road. The General plan needs to delineate. <br />internal streets. ' . Further coordination with TXDOT for future plans for. <br />-S.H. 1.46 is needed.. The possible addition of turn lanes on McCabe road <br />.. <br />should also'be considered. <br />•Traffic Analysis: -The applicant has -submitted a -traffic analysis: study <br />report. The report previously had taken into account a full development ' <br />of 418' apartments for.. a. build -out " in' 2007. It. also included the <br />Commercial Strip Center and Nature Preserve as an estimate with no <br />other detail. of. -their nature.. The current General Plandepicts less <br />density: <br />