Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lakes @FG, Sec.9 <br />March] 5, 2007 <br />Page 4 of5 <br /> <br />. Maintenance Issues - Staff analyzed the nature of this new <br />development, evaluated pros and cons associated with this kind of <br />development, and impact to the community. An overall density may not <br />be an issue but the public services will be difficult to maintain within <br />20' alley& S.S. easement and 15' building setback area. <br /> <br />. Beautification - La Porte Comprehensive Plan provides guidelines for <br />the implementation of beatification program. There are certain areas <br />which are more visible and may serve as a starting point to initiate a <br />beautification programs. This particular site is located at the primary <br />gateway to La Porte. The visual appearance forms the overall <br />impression of the City. The developer needs to submit building design <br />standards for the proposed project to verify aesthetic visual appearance <br />of the subdivision. <br /> <br />. Sidewalks - Section 5.02 of the Development Ordinance empowers the <br />Commission to require pedestrian sidewalks when it feels their inclusion <br />will serve the public interest. Staff would recommend the inclusion of <br />sidewalks within the subdivision. Responsibility for construction of the <br />sidewalks should be specified by covenant and stated on the face of the <br />plat. <br /> <br />Recommendation: Based on items discussed above, the project does not seem to be in <br />consistent with the Special Conditional Use Permit and General Plan <br />approved by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City CounciL <br />Staff recommends disapproval of the Preliminary Plat. If the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission wishes to approve this Preliminary Plat, staff suggests <br />the following conditions as a minimum be considered prior to the Final Plat: <br /> <br />. As per approved SCUP, land use "single-family special or zero lot line" <br />must be approved by the City. <br />. F or emergency purposes, relocate 2nd point of entry to the subdivision <br />along McCabe Road not SH146. <br />. Building setbacks of 15' needs to be approved in lieu of20'. <br />. Lot area is less than the required 4500' for the zero lot line. <br />. Utility schematics are under review by the City. <br />. Require approval of Harris County for the drainage easement. <br />. 20' private alley and sanitary sewer easement, 15' building setback <br />including 10' waterline easement will be difficult to maintain public <br />services. <br />. Building design standards need to be submitted to the City for review. <br />. Protective covenants and restrictions for this subdivision need to be <br />submitted for the City Attorney's review and approval. <br />. Parkland fees in compliance with the Development Ordinance 1444-G <br />dated 4-10-2006 shall be applicable. <br />