My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-24-2005 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Single Family Residential District Committee
>
2000's
>
2005
>
02-24-2005 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:00:25 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:31:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Minutes
Date
11/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />i� <br />September 30, 2004 <br />Mr. Melvin Walker <br />% MRW Group, Inc. <br />2219 A Underwood <br />LaPorte, TX 77571 <br />CITY OF LA PORTE PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br />604 W. Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, TX 77571 <br />www.ci.la-r)orte.tx.us <br />Phone: (281) 471-5020 / Fax (281) 471-1868 <br />RE: Letter of September 20, 2004; Received by the City on September 20, 2004. <br />Dear Mr. Walker: <br />This is in response to your referenced letter. The City of La Porte continues to support our <br />position stated in a letter to you, dated September 1, 2004. <br />Section 106-261 of Chapter 106, City Code of Ordinances states in part " The general public, <br />the planning and zoning commission and the board of adjustment are directed to take note that <br />nonconformities in the use and development of land and buildings are to be avoided, or <br />eliminated where now existing, wherever and, whenever possible, except when necessary <br />to preserve property rights, specific structures, lots or uses established prior to the date these <br />regulations became effective as to the property in question, and when necessary to promote <br />the general welfare and to protect the character of surrounding property. It shall be the <br />responsibility of the planning and zoning commission and the board of adjustment to <br />assist the city council in achieving this goal by advising the city council of their <br />recommendations thereon." <br />All of the previous points of discussion aside, you, upon your own initiate, appeared before a <br />public hearing and the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 20, 2004, to present your <br />plan to open your restaurant in a conforming status. The Commission, taking you at your <br />word, recommended to City Council that you be allowed to open your restaurant subject to <br />the provisions supplied in your own plan. In turn, the City Council heard your petition and <br />after a public hearing on the same matter, approved your plan on June 14, 2004. What we are <br />requesting at this time is that you simply conform to the provisions you supplied in your plan <br />which convinced both the Commission and the City Council that you agreed to open the <br />business in a conforming status and, thereby, agreeing to the spirit of the Zoning mandate to <br />eliminate non -conformity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.