My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-29-1991 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1991
>
08-29-1991 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:18 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:32:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/29/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Section 11-606 empowers the Board of Adjustment to grant <br />variances when it finds that all of the following conditions have <br />been met: <br /> <br />1. That the granting of the variance will not be <br />contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />2. That literal enforcement of the Ordinance <br />will result in unnecessary hardship because <br />of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, <br />shape, topography or other extraordinary or <br />exceptional physical situations unique to the <br />specific piece of property in question. <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical <br />hardship relating to the property itself as <br />distinguished from a hardship relating to <br />convenience, financial considerations or <br />caprice, and the h~rdship must not result <br />from the applicant or property owner's own <br />actions; and <br /> <br />3. That by granting the variance, the spirit of <br />the Ordinance will be observed. <br /> <br />Of these three conditions the second requires the most <br />discussion. It is the contention of the applicants that shared <br />driveways (for the noted lots) are necessary for efficient off- <br />street parking and the necessity arises as a result of the <br />configuration and nature of the property on which the subdivision <br />is being developed (See Exhibit A). <br /> <br />The tract is rather narrow with a sharp offset near the east <br />end of the property. Due to this narrowness, the lots are laid <br />out in a diagonal and in some cases asymmetrical fashion. Also, <br />due to the narrowness of the tract, the width of Colony Drive, <br />(the private road which will run through the subdivision) is the <br />mlnlmum necessary for safe passage of normal traffic and the <br />City's emergency vehicles. <br /> <br />For this reason, the applicants feel that limiting the total <br />number of driveway entrances on Colony Drive is necessary to <br />improve both the safety and aesthetic appearance of the <br />neighborhood. They feel that requiring individual driveways for <br />each lot would therefore constitute a hardship that would be <br />directly caused by design constraints imposed by property <br />configuration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.