My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-24-1992 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1992
>
09-24-1992 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:32:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/24/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Special Exception Request #SE92-005 <br /> <br />remove the fence. The letter also specified that failure to <br />remove the fence within the specified time would result in <br />prosecution in Municipal Court. It was at this point that the <br />property owner applied for the Special Exception. Further <br />action will not be taken until after the Board has rendered it's <br />decision. <br /> <br />As noted, the fencing on this property was erected without a <br />building permit. Once the Board has ruled on this matter, a <br />building permit must be obtained for any fencing to remain on <br />the property. Staff will ensure that fencing conforms to the <br />Board's decision and all of the applicable City Ordinances. <br /> <br />While the Zoning Ordinance does empower the Board to grant <br />Special Exceptions for certain types of non-conforming <br />structures, it does not allow exceptions for structures located on <br />public property. Further it does not provide for exceptions for <br />types of structures that are as expressly prohibited as this type <br />of fence. <br /> <br />Finally, Section 11-605 only allows Special Exceptions to be <br />granted when the Board finds that doing so "will not adversely <br />affect the value and use of adjacent or neighboring property or <br />be contrary to the best public interest". Clearly, a structure that <br />interferes with access to public property will "affect the value <br />and use of neighboring properties". <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />Based on the facts of this case, this structure is not eligible for <br />the requested Special Exception. Granting the exception would <br />be contrary to the best public interest. Staff, therefore, <br />recommends denial of Special Exception SE92-005. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.