My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
03-24-1994 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1994
>
03-24-1994 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:32:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/24/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Staff Report of 4/'2B/94 <br />V94-003 <br /> <br />If the Board should choose to grant this request, staff would ask that, in the <br />best public interest and in order to observe the spirit of the Zoning <br />Ordinance, two conditions be attached. They are as follows: <br /> <br />. The driveway be widened to 20 feet. <br /> <br />Commercial driveways are often used by more than one vehicle at a <br />time. With this is mind, the minimum 20 feet width established by the <br />ordinance is reasonable and should be observed. <br /> <br />. The asphalt driveway should be removed and replaced with a <br />reinforced concrete drive that is finished to match the other drives <br />onto the property. <br /> <br />Highway 146 is the major corridor for traffic passing through La Porte. <br />It is the City's chance to put on its best public face and a number of <br />La Porte's most attractive commercial facilities are located on this <br />corridor. <br /> <br />Given the high profile location of this property, requiring this driveway <br />to match the other drives onto the property is not unreasonable. <br />Maintaining an attractive appearance in this area is in the best interest <br />of the public. <br /> <br />In summation: <br /> <br />. Prohibiting a second driveway onto "A" Street would impose a <br />hardship. <br /> <br />. The hardship would result from strict conformance with Zoning <br />Ordinance requirements as they apply to a shallow piece of property. <br /> <br />. The hardship involves a matter of safety and not convenience or <br />financial considerations. <br /> <br />. Improved safety provided by the second driveway would serve both the <br />best public interest and the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.