My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
03-28-1996 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1996
>
03-28-1996 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:33:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/28/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Board of Adjustment <br />Staff Report of 418-96 <br />#A96-002 <br />Analysis: <br />Section 11-604 of the Zoning Ordinance empowers the Boazd of Adjustment to consider appeals <br />of zoning decisions made by the City. As per ordinance, the Boazd may grant an appeal only <br />when it finds all of the following conditions have been satisfied. <br />• That there is a reasonable difference of interpretation as to the specific intent of <br />the zoning regulations or zoning map, provided the interpretation of the <br />Enforcement Officer is a reasonable presumption and the zoning ordinance is <br />unreasonable. <br />• That the resulting interpretation will not grant a special privilege to one property <br />inconsistent with other properties or uses similarly situated. <br />• The decision of the Boazd must be in the best interest of the community and <br />consistent with the spirit and interest of the City's zoning laws and the <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City of Ira Porte. <br />Regazding the first point, there is no reasonable difference of interpretation of the ordinances. <br />The driveway criteria established by the ordinance are cleaz and explicit. The proposed <br />driveway configuration does not satisfy these criteria. <br />Additionally, given the property's location, the intent of the ordinance to control driveway access <br />is very reasonable and based on sound traffic engineering principles. <br />The City's Thoroughfare Plan designates Fairmont Parkway as a primary arterial (See Exhibit <br />B): A primary arterial is defined as a four-lane thoroughfare designed to distribute high volumes <br />of local and outside traffic to major employment and activity centers. Traffic control devices <br />(stop lights and stop signs) aze generally located at intervals of not less than 'k mile. <br />What this means is that Fairmont Parkway is designed to move lazge volumes of traffic on a <br />daily basis. The existing street does this very well. Excessive driveway cuts will tend to <br />interfere with traffic flow and, therefore, create traffic hazazds. It should also be noted that <br />because of the esplanade location, Fairmont Pazkway driveways can be right turn only. The <br />esplanades cannot be cut. <br />Also, as illustrated on the applicant's site plan, the property is located on a corner. The Fourth <br />Street right-of--way is open and paved. It is available for driveway access and will, regardless <br />of the outcome of this appeal, function as the primary entry and exit for traffic approaching from <br />the east. Fourth Street will also provide the only point from which exiting traffic can turn left <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.