Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />Board of Adjustment <br />Apri122, 1999 <br />#SE 99-002 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />While the lot in question is not located at the corner of two street right-of- <br />ways, it is located at the corner of an improved sixteen-foot (16') alley and a <br />street right-of--way. The alley is used for vehicular trafl"ic/access to <br />businesses along Main Street and staff feels the exception is needed to <br />establish the proposed seven-foot (7') side yard setback off the northern <br />property line. We believe that this situation is within the spirit of Section <br />105-191(b)(2xc) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of La Porte. (See <br />Exhibit B). The City Attorney has concurred. <br />Analysis: The Code of Ordinances defines a special exception as a specified <br />enumerated deviation from zoning regulations. The Board is empowered to <br />grant a special exception when it finds the following: <br />• Granting the exception will not adversely affect the value, or use of <br />neighboring property. <br />• Granting the exception will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br />Regarding this request, the relief being sought is covered by the terms of the <br />Special Exception Section. <br />• Construction of a 20' X 20' office/storage accessory building on an <br />existing slab foundation located three-foot (3') off the northern property <br />line (alley). <br />Based on these factors, staff believes the request is eligible to be considered <br />for the exception. The issues to consider are impact on neighboring property <br />and the best public interest. This would allow the use of an existing slab and <br />provide a uniform look to the property since the principle building is seven- <br />foot (7') offthe northern (alley) property line. <br />Based on these considerations, it does not appear that granting the requested <br />special exception will adversely impact the adjacent properties. Also, the <br />applicant is willing to provide any additional screening the Board feels may <br />be justified. Therefore, it does not appear that granting this exception would <br />be contrary to the best public interest. <br />