My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-12-2001 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2001
>
07-12-2001 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:09:36 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />January 24, 2002 <br />#V 02-001 <br />Page 3 <br />distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial <br />considerations or caprice, and the hardship must not result from the <br />applicant'or property owner's own actions; and <br />❖ That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed <br />The Board must decide if the applicant's request to have building setbacks at <br />20'-10'-10' instead . of 25'-20'-20' per Section 106-333 Table 3 is <br />reasonable. The Board is charged with deciding whether all of the above <br />conditions have been met. <br />The applicant'believes that imposing current setbacks will cause congestion <br />and eliminate green space and recreational amenities. The applicant requests <br />that the Board recognize this as a hardship. <br />The applicant designed Churchill Place for the senior population; however, <br />concerns arise over use. While measures are. in place to ensure that the <br />property remains a senior facility for 40 years, after that period, the use could <br />revert to "regular". multi -family use. If the setbacks (25'-20'-20') required <br />by ordinance are not enforced, the complex could become a Non -conforming <br />structure. <br />Furthermore, staff does not have evidence proving that a "hardship" exists. <br />No unique physical conditions exist on the applicant's property that preclude <br />the project from complying with the City's setbacks. The applicant could <br />incorporate the remainder of Block 1160 into the project to meet the City's <br />building setbacks. The applicant has not filed a plat for this project; <br />therefore, additional lots could be added without causing a re -plat. <br />Conclusion: The applicant has not shown that circumstances unique to his property exist. <br />Based on the facts outlined in this report, the conditions precedent to the <br />granting of a variance do not exist. <br />Appeals: Asper Section 106-196 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of La Porte: <br />Any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by. any decision of the <br />Board of Adjustment, or any taxpayer, or any q, ficer,' department, board or <br />bureau of the city may present to a court of record a petition for a writ of <br />certiorari, as provided by VTCA, Local Government Code Section <br />211.011, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole or <br />in part, spec Eying the grounds of the illegality. Such petition shall be <br />presented to the court within ten days after the filing of the decision in the. <br />office of the Board of Adjustment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.