Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report December 04, 2003 <br />Special Exception Request #SE03-007 <br />Rmuested by: Francisco & Mariana Rea, Property Owners <br />Requested for: Side yard requirement on a corner lot <br />Location: 238 So. Holmes Street <br />(Block 72; Lots 21, 22; Bayfront to La Porte) <br />Zo_ nwa: Low Density Residential (R 1) <br />Background: In February 2003, the applicants received a property survey that identified <br />the size of their property (50' X 125'). The property in question is shown on <br />the attached area map and is known as 238 South Holmes. (See Exhibit A). <br />In reviewing the survey, there was no mention of building lines and/or <br />required yard setbacks. At that time, the applicants proceeded with selecting <br />a home design and the development of construction plans. The proposed <br />house -plan provided to the City allowed a six-foot (6) setback for both side <br />yards. (See Exhibit B). <br />The owners provided the City with their construction plans and staff <br />reviewed the plans -for compliance with applicable codes and regulations. <br />Unfortunately, the staff member that reviewed the plan failed to note the <br />property was a comer lot and did not recognize the inadequate side setback <br />adjoining the public right-of-way. . In developing comer lots, zoning <br />regulations require a minimum ten -foot (10') setback on the side that adjoins. <br />a public right-of-way (East B Street). (See Exhibit Q. <br />In this case, the applicant's plans only provided a six-foot (6) setback in lieu <br />of the required ten -foot (10'). While "East B Street" is a public right-of- <br />way, it is "undeveloped" and currently- there are no plans to develop the <br />street for vehicular traffic. The Public Works Division has acknowledged <br />that the undeveloped rights -of -way in this area is being retained for drainage <br />purposes. <br />The applicants are requesting a four -foot (4) Special Exception to the side <br />yard requirement on a comer lot. Granting of this exception would allow a <br />six-foot (6) setback in lieu of the standard ten foot (10) requirement. <br />