Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Board of Adjustment <br />January 22, 2004 Meeting <br />#SE 04-001 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Therefore, while. considering this request,- the Board needs to note that they <br />are being asked to consider a second property request (variance) as well. <br />Approval of each request will be necessary to make the proposed project <br />"viable'. <br />The abutting lot requirement as referenced in Section 106-191(b)(2)(a) does <br />not exist; however, there are two older existing homes within the overall <br />block. Both homes have a reduced front yard setback. Without the benefit <br />of a property survey for each site, it appears that one of the structures has an <br />approximate setback of 12' to 17' while the other is between 6'to 9'. (See <br />Exhibit C) <br />The standard front yard setback requirement is 25'. (See Exhibit D). <br />However, you will note ' the survey/site plan *provided by . the applicant <br />identifies the need for a 10' front yard in lieu ofthe standard 25'. <br />This exception is being "requested . under the terms of Section 106- <br />191(bx2Xa) of the City's Code of Ordinances. <br />❖ To deviate a front yard setback requirement where the actual front yard <br />setback of any abutting lot does not meet the front yard requirement. <br />The attached aerial map identifies the location of the property in question <br />along with two pre-existing nonconforming homes within the same. block <br />(See Exhibit Q. <br />Analysis: The Code of Ordinances defines a special exception as a specified <br />enumerated deviation from zoning regulations. The Board is empowered to <br />grant a special exception when it finds the following: <br />❖ Granting the exception will not adversely affect. the value, or use of <br />neighboring property. <br />❖ Grrwiting the exception will not be contrary to the best public interest. . <br />