Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />Staff Report - September 23, 2004 <br />Special Exception Request #SEO4-009 <br />Requested bv: Sejal Dimple Patel, Prayosha Ventures, L.P. <br />Requested for: Reduction in the pazking space size and maneuvering aisle for off-street <br />parking. <br />Location: 401 W. G Street, LaPorte <br />ZOn1IIg: General Commercial (G.C.) <br />Background: Holiday Inn Express is a proposed hotel and suites to be located at the <br />northwest corner of West G Street and South 8`~ Street about 250 feet east of <br />the State Highway 146. The project is proposed on 1.3214 ac. (57,560 sq. ft.) <br />and consists of 61 room, four story high building proposed in a GC zone. <br />The plat of the subject property has already been approved. Access to the <br />proposed facility will be off West "G" Street, barring access to SH. 146 due <br />to narrowness of the commercial reserve along the State Highway 146. <br />Eazlier, staff received a site plan for the proposed development. After <br />reviewing it with the Development Review Committee, staff mailed and <br />faxed written comments to the developer about items that needed to be <br />addressed. An issue involved pazking space size and maneuvering aisle. <br />During review, staff used the following sections of the City's zoning <br />ordinance: <br />Section 106-835(a) -Each standard pazking space shall not be less than ten <br />feet wide and eighteen feet in length. The plan shows 9 feet wide, just one <br />foot shy of the standazd width. The subject request is based solely on the <br />space limitation due to size and irregulaz shape of the tract for the proposed <br />project. <br />Section 106-835(c)4 - A minimum of 28 feet maneuvering aisle is required <br />for 90-degree pazking. The submitted plan shows maneuvering lane with 27 <br />feet adjusted by 1 foot. The developer claimed a hazdship in designing <br />parking and maintaining a feasible density for the said project. <br />Using the City's current pazking standazds, the submitted plans do not meet <br />the requirements. It should be noted that this change is 1 foot less than the <br />current standazds, but does adhere to the previous standazds prior to October <br />14, 2002. All plans prior to this date were allowed to be 9 feet wide as shown <br />in the current submittal by the applicant. The previous plans for the proposed <br />hotel were drawn with the size of 9'x18'. <br />