Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Board of Adjustment <br />October 27,2005 Meeting <br />#SE 05-002 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />Analysis: <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />.:. A rear yard exception where the actual rear yard setback of any four or <br />more lots in the same block does not meet the rear yard requirements of <br />these regulations. <br /> <br />The Code of Ordinances defines a special exception as a specified <br />enumerated deviation from zoning regulations. The Board is empowered to <br />grant a special exception when it finds the following: <br /> <br />.:. Granting the exception will not adversely affect the value, or use of <br />neighboring property. <br /> <br />.:. Granting the exception will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />Regarding this request, the relief being sought is similar to the circumstances <br />outlined in the terms of the Special Exception Section. <br /> <br />. Allow placement of a house and construction of porches and stairs for a <br />single-family dwelling with a reduced front yard and rear yard setbacks. <br /> <br />The issues to consider are what the possible impact on neighboring property <br />will be, and the best public interest. There are other homes within the same <br />block that do not comply with the standard twenty-five foot (25') front yard <br />setback. The home (including the addition of stairs and porch), when closest <br />to the front property line, is set back just over seven feet. Based on the <br />applicant's request, the porch addition would result in her structure being <br />located just over twenty one (21 ') from the front property line. <br /> <br />The Board must consider whether decreasing the front and rear yard <br />setbacks, as requested by the applicant, will adversely impact the adjacent <br />properties or be contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />When considering SE #05-002, it should be noted that the existing houses <br />currently represent an "average setback" of the various yard setbacks <br />existing within the same block. If the Board is uncomfortable granting these <br />"less-restrictive" setbacks to the subject home, they may consider amending <br />the applicant's request by reducing the proposed size of the roofed-over <br />porch. <br /> <br />If the Board grants the Special Exception for the applicant, staff will notify <br />the applicant that: <br />