My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
03-23-06 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment Minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2006
>
03-23-06 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:33:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/23/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Board of Adjustment <br />04/27/06 - #A 06-002 <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />. Section 106-261 states that nonconformities in the use and <br />development of land and buildings are to be avoided, or eliminated <br />where not existing, wherever and whenever possible, except when <br />necessary to preserve property rights. <br /> <br />Current regulations are written in a clear manner that allows the <br />enforcement officer to understand the intent of City Council as it relates <br />to nonconforming structures and uses. These regulations have been in <br />effect since the January 26, 1987 adoption of Zoning Ordinance #1501 <br />(Chapter 106). <br /> <br />b) That the resulting interpretation will not grant a special privilege to one <br />property inconsistent with other properties or uses similarly situated. <br /> <br />. Section 106-262(g) states that, "A structure that is nonconforming may <br />be altered, remodeled or otherwise improved but not enlarged, unless <br />the board of adjustment determines that such enlargement will not <br />result in an increase in the degree of nonconformity with the <br />regulations and development standards of the district in which it is <br />located. " <br /> <br />Current regulations show consistency in the enforcement of the <br />regulation and ensure no "special privilege" to anyone property. <br /> <br />c) The decision of the Board must be in the best interest of the community and <br />consistent with the spirit and interest of the city's zoning laws and the <br />comprehensive plan of the city. <br /> <br />. Section 106-262 (h) (2) states that, "A nonconforming structure shall <br />be deemed abandoned when the structure ceases to be used for the <br />nonconformity for a period of 180 consecutive calendar days. The use <br />of the nonconforming structure, when abandoned, shall not resume." <br /> <br />Staff believes the request conflicts with the intent of the regulations <br />and would not be in the best interest of the community or be consistent <br />with the spirit and interest of the City's Zoning Laws and the <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> <br />Based on the facts and considerations noted in this report, Staff feels the <br />request does not comply with the intent of the City's nonconforming <br />structure regulations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.