My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
05-24-07 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2007
>
05-24-07 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:34:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />June 28, 2007 <br />#V 07-004 <br />Page 3 of4 <br /> <br />In accordance with Section 106-1 92(b)(2)(b), the applicant is asking the ZBOA to grant <br />relief to the "unnecessary hardship" resulting from the shallowness, creek and <br />conservation area unique to this property. <br /> <br />Analysis: <br /> <br />Section 1 06-192(b)(1), in the Code of Ordinances, defines a variance as a deviation from <br />the literal provisions of the chapter, which is granted by the Board when strict <br />conformity to the chapter would cause an unnecessary hardship because of the <br />circumstances unique to the property on which the variance is granted. <br /> <br />Except as otherwise prohibited, the Board is empowered to authorize a variance from a <br />requirement when the Board finds that all of the following conditions have been met. <br /> <br />.:. That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />.:. That literal enforcement of the chapter will result in unnecessary hardship because of <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, topography or other extraordinary or <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the specific piece of property in question. <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself as <br />distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, fmancial considerations or <br />caprice, and the hardship must not result from the applicant or property owner's own <br />actions; and <br /> <br />.:. That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed. <br /> <br />In determining if granting the applicant's request would be contrary to the general public, <br />Staff recognizes that the development of the property should not create a problem with <br />adjoining properties, e.g. Seabreeze Park and parking lot, block view of the bay, and the <br />Electrical Company's clearance. <br /> <br />When looking at the second condition, Staff recognizes that the property may meet the <br />physical hardship test. Literal enforcement of current regulations would render the site <br />"unbuildable." As previously noted in this report, relief from the standard front yard <br />setback was granted separately (under a special exception request); therefore, only the <br />side yard issue is discussed in this report. If approved, this variance will allow a detached <br />garage in the side yard setback when adjacent to a public right-of-way. <br /> <br />As shown on the attached site plan, an angling creek located at the rear of the property, <br />determines the location of the designated conservation area. That location in turn <br />determines where the standard 20' conservation setback area is located on the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.