My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1992-03-23 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Meetings
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1990's
>
1992
>
1992-03-23 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:03 PM
Creation date
6/12/2006 3:13:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/23/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City council <br />March 23, 1992, Page 4 <br /> <br />Motion was made bY CouncilDerson COODer to adoDt Ordinance <br />1828 as read bY the city Attorney. Second by councilperson <br />Clarke. The motion carried, 8 ayes and 0 nays. <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, <br />McLaughlin, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone <br />None <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />11. Council considered an ordinance setting rates for use of <br />Municipal Recreation and Fitness Center. <br /> <br />councilperson Gay had a concern with what he felt was "double <br />paying" by citizens, that is, tax money is being used to build <br />the facility and then the citizens are going to be charged to <br />use it. He also had concern with senior citizens being <br />charged. Stan Sherwood explained that all seniors who were <br />part of the Senior citizens program do not have to pay to use <br />the facility for Senior citizen-related activities. If they <br />use the facility after the Senior citizen program is over for <br />the day, then they would pay one-half price. <br /> <br />David Hyde reviewed the proposed fee structure. Stan Sherwood <br />answered questions from Council. Discussion was held <br />regarding not allowing 16-year olds to use the facility unless <br />they are accompanied by their guardian or other adult. It was <br />explained that this is not in the ordinance, but appears in <br />the policy manual for the use of the facility. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Councilperson Gay that since this should <br />probably be a Dart of the ordinance. to table the ordinance <br />until the next meetinq. Second by councilperson Skelton. The <br />motion was defeated, 2 ayes and 6 nays. <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Councilpersons Gay and Skelton <br />councilpersons sutherland, Cooper, <br />McLaughlin, Clarke and Mayor Malone <br /> <br />Thrower, <br /> <br />Councilperson Sutherland recommended some revisions to the <br />ordinance: (1) change requirement that a member of the family <br />apply in person for membership, to require an adult member of <br />the family apply in person for membership; (2) would like to <br />see the $10.00 sign up fee waived for the first 30 days of <br />enrollment. <br /> <br />There was discussion regarding fees for senior citizens and <br />also use of the facilities by the general public during times <br />that classes for the seniors are in session. <br /> <br />councilperson Skelton expressed concern that senior citizens <br />would be charged too much, even at half price. Dan Kennedy, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.