My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1984-08-01 Regular Meeting (2)
LaPorte
>
City Meetings
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1984
>
1984-08-01 Regular Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:59 PM
Creation date
6/13/2006 3:32:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/1/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />• <br />• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council <br />August 1, 1984, Page 3 <br />Councilperson Matuszak stated that he thinks we owe it to our <br />constituents to find a solution to this, although he feels <br />there is no easy solution. He thinks what we are seeing here <br />is a direct result of the drought. It irritates a lot of <br />people to water the lawn and have to pay the 70 percent in <br />the summer. This is a real problem, and it is incumbent upon <br />Council to look at this and see if'we can't take some kind <br />of baseline approach. Take the winter rates, for instance, <br />and average them. We are now computerized, and it should not <br />be difficult to get the histories. <br />6. Mrs. Mary Hanks spoke to Council regarding high water bills <br />in the Hunter's Trace area. She stated that people in her <br />area had asked for someone~to come out and check their meters, <br />but had no success in getting anyone there. She asked Council <br />for help in this regard, and was assured that the~matte~r would <br />be looked into. <br />Councilperson Skelton inquired of Mrs. Hanks if her ne'ighbor's <br />$243 water bill included water, garbage and sewer, and if her <br />• $91 water bill included everything. Mrs. Hanks answered in th.e <br />affirmative. Mr. Skelton commented that, based on that, her <br />neighbor was using about 77,000 gallons of water a month, and <br />Mrs. Hanks was using about 25,000 a month. <br />Councilperson Westergren commented that she understood a tax <br />was included in the mortgage payment in the~area in question <br />that was used to pay off bond indebtedness for the utility <br />district, in addition to the water rates. That is now being <br />paid in the water rates, so if you added that to the water rate <br />you pay each month, it would increase considerably. She <br />agreed that the water bills seemed high. She gave sederal <br />suggestions as to how the meters could be checked for accuracy. <br />Mr. Owen said it would be no problem to send someone out :to <br />check the meters in that area, and it would be done. <br />Councilperson Graves asked if the residents would be~charged~ <br />if no meter malfunctions were found. He did not .feel that a <br />charge should be made since these meters were installed by <br />someone other than the City and we aren't sure~how they work. <br />Mr. Owen said the charge is by ordinance, but that Council <br />could waive that particular ordinance~at their discretion. <br /> <br />Mr. Matuszak asked if there could be a check done~on the meters <br />• in the areas we have recently picked up by annexation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.