O-2014-3542 lots 92 & 93,blk 6,Spencer Hwy Estates,3318 Clarksville,condemned for demolition

Browse Search

Ordinance No. C0 "°JJ40Q-1 Page 2 building(s) upon which such conclusion was based. The report shall be filed in all cases no matter what conclusion is stated by the Board; and WHEREAS, it has heretofore come to the attention of the Board that the buildings consisting of 1) a mobile home structure, 2) two accessory storage buildings adjacent to said mobile home structure, together located on the southwest portion of BLK 6, LT 92 & 93, SPENCER HIGHWAY ESTATES which is further described as 3318 CLARKSVILLE ST. (SECONDARY STRUCTURE ON LEFT SIDE OF PROPERTY), Harris County, Texas, have become dangerous or substandard and thereby a public nuisance, as established in Section 82-473 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of LaPorte; and WHEREAS, said Board has heretofore made and filed its written report, dated AUGUST 14, 2014 finding said building to be in fact a dangerous building; WHEREAS, City Council received such report, and ordered notice to the record owners of said property, ELISEO GUZMAN & MARIA S. CAMPOS, whose address is 9617 E. ANDRICKS RD., LA PORTE, TX 77571, that a hearing as provided in Section 82-477 of said Ordinance would be held at 6:00 PM on OCTOBER 13, 2014, at 604 W. Fairmont Parkway, at the Council Chambers, City Hall, City of La Porte, Texas, at which time the Council would hear further evidence for and against the conclusions of the Board; WHEREAS, the City Secretary has heretofore served notice of said hearing upon said owners, by registered mail, return receipt requested, which return receipt indicated that said owners received said notice on POST OFFICE MADE 4 ATTEMPTS AT DELIVERY, SIGNED FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 a date more than ten (10) days before the date set for said hearing; WHEREAS, at said date, time, and place, City Council met in regular session to conduct such public hearing, at which time evidence was presented both for and against the conclusions of the Board, at which time the hearing was concluded;