My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1980-02-20 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Meetings
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1980
>
1980-02-20 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:55 PM
Creation date
6/22/2006 1:59:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/20/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />• Regular Meeting 2/20/80 2 <br />3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 6, 1980 - <br />- SPECIAL MEETING - FEBRUARY 13, 1980 - <br />r4otion by Commissioner Tomerlin, seconded y Commissioner <br />Kibodeaux to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of <br />February 6, 1980, and the special meeting of February 13, 1980. <br />Motion carried by the following vote: <br />AYES: Commissioners Tomerlin, Kibodeaux, Cline, and Simons. <br />NAYS: None. <br />+ + + <br />4. PRESENT CHARTER REVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION FOR <br />CONSIDERATION - MR. H. P. PFEIFFER - Mr. Pfeiffer was recog- <br />nized and copies of the recommendation were distributed. <br />Mr. Pfeiffer stated as outlined in the cover letter, a special <br />meeting was held for the Charter Revision Committee to give final <br />approval to revisions to the proposed Charter districting plan, <br />and districting map. Attached to the letter, is a district <br />map showing how the various districts are drawn and a proposal <br />for electing various commissioners and the Mayor. Copies are <br />• attached and made a part of these minutes. <br />Mr. Pfeiffer stated that all the single member districts have <br />been approved by all concerned and felt that they would meet <br />with the approval of the Justice Department. There are no <br />objections at this time. <br />There are six single member districts. The boundary lines are <br />good and clear, using major thoroughfares and the railroad. <br />Making it easy for election judges to determine what district a <br />person may reside. <br />Also recommended by the Committee to the City Commission, is two <br />at large positions. This was approved by a seven to two vote. <br />Those opposed simply wanted to have more at large positions. <br />Mr. Pfeiffer stated that the Committee recommended that the <br />Commission take action; they felt it would work and would help <br />in any way they could to see that the election carried at the <br />time that it was called. Mr. Pfeiffer stated that he had no <br />further questions unless there were questions of him. <br />Mayor Meza asked if the Commission had any questions? <br />Mayor Meza expressed appreciation to Mr. Pfeiffer and the <br />• Revision Committee for the long, hard hours that had been put <br />in on the proposed revision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.