Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• Minutes, Joint Public Hearing and Regular Meeting, <br />July 15, 1981, Page 2 <br />sub-division). It was <br />out we could not build <br />Lomax zoning. I would <br />lots. I think you sho <br />permit us in Pinegrove <br />you. <br />not a City at that time. We found <br />on just one of these lots due to the <br />like to be able to build on my 50 foot <br />ald consider our deed restrictions and <br />Valley to build on our lots. Thank <br />Meza: What were the deed restrictions at the time? <br />Cooper: They are 50 foot lots, and we could build on each <br />lot. I don't remember what the square footage for the house <br />was. <br />Meza: At this time Planning and Zoning wishes to rezone <br />Lomax back to its original status with the exception that <br />residential areas be zoned R-2, which would permit 850 square <br />foot residences as a minimum. <br />Cooper: That would probably be all right. I was unaware of <br />what that was. <br />• Faris: The property requirements are a minimum of 6,000 <br />square feet in the La Porte Zoning Ordinance and your 50' x <br />125' would be 6,250 square feet, so your lots would more than <br />meet the minimum lot requirements under this ordinance. <br />Pfeiffer: Only in Old La Porte does the ordinance permit <br />50' x 125' lots; the ordinance calls for 60 foot frontage. <br />Faris: In the proposed rezoning, I don't think that was <br />pointed out, was it? <br />Pfeiffer: We had proposed to allow those subdivisions in <br />Lomax platted to 50' lots to allow them to build. <br />Faris: So she would be allowed to build on these 50' lots? <br />Pfeiffer: Yes, sir. <br />Askins: Let me clarify a few points. The if I'm wrong, some- <br />one correct me. We have consistently allowed building of a <br />single family residence on a building site containing 6,000 <br />square feet or more. I think Booth homes is an example where <br />houses were built on 50 foot lots. I think the prohibition <br />may be for 60 foot lots or more will be Fairmont Park, and <br />that's the developer's choice. Because they have less depth, <br />110 feet, I believe. Certainly in Old La Porte - by that I <br />•. mean the part that was platted in the 1890's, it is common <br />that if you have two (2) 25 foot lots you have been permitted <br />