My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1981-07-15 Joint Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Meetings
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1981
>
1981-07-15 Joint Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
6/22/2006 2:47:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/15/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• Minutes, Joint Public Hearing and Regular Meeting, <br />July 15, 1981, Page 2 <br />sub-division). It was <br />out we could not build <br />Lomax zoning. I would <br />lots. I think you sho <br />permit us in Pinegrove <br />you. <br />not a City at that time. We found <br />on just one of these lots due to the <br />like to be able to build on my 50 foot <br />ald consider our deed restrictions and <br />Valley to build on our lots. Thank <br />Meza: What were the deed restrictions at the time? <br />Cooper: They are 50 foot lots, and we could build on each <br />lot. I don't remember what the square footage for the house <br />was. <br />Meza: At this time Planning and Zoning wishes to rezone <br />Lomax back to its original status with the exception that <br />residential areas be zoned R-2, which would permit 850 square <br />foot residences as a minimum. <br />Cooper: That would probably be all right. I was unaware of <br />what that was. <br />• Faris: The property requirements are a minimum of 6,000 <br />square feet in the La Porte Zoning Ordinance and your 50' x <br />125' would be 6,250 square feet, so your lots would more than <br />meet the minimum lot requirements under this ordinance. <br />Pfeiffer: Only in Old La Porte does the ordinance permit <br />50' x 125' lots; the ordinance calls for 60 foot frontage. <br />Faris: In the proposed rezoning, I don't think that was <br />pointed out, was it? <br />Pfeiffer: We had proposed to allow those subdivisions in <br />Lomax platted to 50' lots to allow them to build. <br />Faris: So she would be allowed to build on these 50' lots? <br />Pfeiffer: Yes, sir. <br />Askins: Let me clarify a few points. The if I'm wrong, some- <br />one correct me. We have consistently allowed building of a <br />single family residence on a building site containing 6,000 <br />square feet or more. I think Booth homes is an example where <br />houses were built on 50 foot lots. I think the prohibition <br />may be for 60 foot lots or more will be Fairmont Park, and <br />that's the developer's choice. Because they have less depth, <br />110 feet, I believe. Certainly in Old La Porte - by that I <br />•. mean the part that was platted in the 1890's, it is common <br />that if you have two (2) 25 foot lots you have been permitted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.