My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-1984-1409
LaPorte
>
Legislative records
>
GR1000-05 Ordinances - GR1000-05 Ordinances & Resolutions
>
1980's
>
1984
>
O-1984-1409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:38:42 PM
Creation date
7/21/2006 10:10:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
10/3/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page Two <br />Mr. Robert T. Herrera <br />August 20, 1984 <br /> <br />a. With the assistance of your City Attorney, attempt to <br />negotiate for removal of Section 7 of the Indemnity <br />Agreement. Installation of a traffic signal is a bene- <br />fit both to the city and the state and it is an obliga- <br />tion of both the city and the State Department of High- <br />ways and Public Transportation to provide for safety on <br />the public roadways. You should be more successful in <br />negotiating this point if the highway location is a <br />state or county roadway. <br /> <br />b. Since the agreement is a standard form agreement, <br />if the state is unwilling to negotiate for the <br />removal of Section 7, before signing the document <br />ask the state official in charge of negotiating the <br />contract what will happen if the contract is not <br />signed in its present form. The response that you <br />can anticipate would be that the state will not pro- <br />vide the traffic signal unless the agreement is signed. <br />Thus, by having that question answered, the city has <br />placed itself in a position of signing a contract of <br />adhesion. In other words, if you don't sign the con- <br />tract the way it is written, the state will not provide <br />the traffic signals~ <br /> <br />c. As to the liabilit.y of the city for this type of <br />function see also: <br /> <br />i. Jezek v. City of Midland, 605 S.W. 544 (Tex. 1980). <br /> <br />ii. Andrews v_ City of Dallas, 580 S.W.2d 908 <br />(Tex.Civ.App_- Eastland 1979). <br /> <br />I hope that this answers your questions, Mr. Herrera. If we can <br />be of further assistance, please let me know. <br /> <br /> <br />v J. LaBrec <br />General Counsel <br /> <br /> <br />DJL/jkw <br />Encls. <br /> <br />xc: Mr. Francis Fey <br /> <br />;.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.