HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-2006-2959
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Date Requested: November 6. 2006
Requested By' S. GUlet! ~
Department: Public Works
Appropriation
Source of Funds: Fund 016
Account Number: 016-705-553-8085
Report:
Resolution:
Ordinance:
x
Amount Budgeted: $600,000
Exhibits:
Ordinance
Amount Requested: $542,880
Exhibits:
Report on A2reement
Budgeted Item: YES
Exhibits
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION ~
The City of Houston Southeast Water Purification Plant (SEWPP) is schedul~for an expansion
from 120 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) to 200 MGD. Additionally, repairs and upgrades of
the existing facility are also planned to improve operational efficiencies and comply with Surface
Water Treatment regulations. The La Porte Area Water Authority (Authority) is not
participating in the expansion, but its share of the repairs and upgrades total $542,880, based on
ownership capacity (7.8 MGD). The Authority' existing capacity is estimated to serve the cities
of La Porte, Morgan's Point and Shoreacres through 2030. The attached excerpt from the Report
Regarding Proposed Expansion of the SEWPP, approved by the Authority Board on January 12,
2000 meeting, outlines the projected demands for its service area through 2040.
The Authority Board, at its October 18, 2006 meeting, approved the attached Amendment to
Cost Sharing Agreement Southeast Water Purification Plant (Restated and Amended). The
Agreement changes ownership allocations with the Co-Participants and details costs associated
with the expansion and repair/upgrades. Additionally, it formalized the recent change from
contract operation to operation by the City of Houston, and imposes the same performance
standards as the previous contract operator.
The enabling legislation of the Authority requires the La Porte City Council to approve all
contracts entered into by the Authority. Funds for this Project are available in the fund balance
of the Authority.
Action Required bv Council: Approve ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute the
Amendment to Cost Sharing Agreement Southeast Water Purification Plant (Restated and
Amended).
/ph06
I te
ORDINANCE NO. 2006-~q~
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING
AGREEMENT SOUTHEAST WATER PURIFICATION PLANT BETWEEN THE LA PORTE
AREA WATER AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF HOUSTON, APPROPRIATING THE SUM
NOT TO EXCEED $542,880.00, TO FUND SAID CONTRACT, MAKING VARIOUS
FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT, FINDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE:
section 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes
the contract, agreement, or other undertaking described in the
title of this ordinance, a copy of which is on file in the office
of the City Secretary. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute
such document and all related documents on behalf of the city of La
Porte. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to attest to all
such signatures and to affix the seal of the City to all such
documents.
City Council appropriates the sum not to exceed
$542,880.00 from the City of La Porte Fund 016, to fund said
contract.
Sec tion 2.
The City Council officially finds, determines,
recites, and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date,
hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was
posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the
City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as
required by the Open Meetings Law, Chapter 551, Texas Government
Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required
by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject
matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted
upon.
The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms
such written notice and the contents and posting thereof.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after
its passage and approval, and it is so ordered.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this 6th day of November, 2006.
ATTEST:
By:
CITY OF LA PORTE
~~y~
Alton E. Porter
Mayor
~dUJa O. ~
Martha A. Gillet
City Secretary
APPROVED:
rytZU
Knox W. Askins
City Attorney
2
CITY OF LA PORTE
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
Memo
To: La Porte Area Water Authority Board
From:Steve Gillett, Director of Public Works ~
CC: John Joerns, Interim City Manager
Michael Dolby, Finance Director
Date: 10/12/2006
Re: LPAWA - Additional Capital Cost Update
I have previously provided reports on the Progress of the expansion and upgrade of
the Southeast Water Purification Plant, as well as the cost estimates for the
Authority's share of the upgrade (the Authority is not participating in the expansion). I
will summarize the history of the cost estimate to the Authority, and then report on the
recent progress made by the Co-Participants in reducing the scope and cost of the
Project.
The City of Houston originally informed the Authority of its estimated cost totaling
$669,059 in December 2002. This cost was upgraded to $742,003 in March 2003,
$784,756 in October 2003 and $833,181 in January 2004. In March 2004 the
Authority's cost estimated was $904,800, and was expected to increase to over
$1,000,000 by the time design was complete and bids issued. Co-Participants
began questioning Houston on individual cost elements of the Project, and after
several months, Houston supplied information on major elements of the Project. It
quickly became apparent that several components that were previously presented as
regulatory requirements were in fact Houston's estimate of future regulatory
requirements, some as far as 10 years in the future. Additionally, it appeared that
some security improvements were excessive for threat levels, and the Co-
Participants began to demand input into the process.
At the February 10, 2005 Co-Participant's monthly meeting, two committees were
formed. The Technical Review Committee would review the need for various design
elements, and recommend changes and/or reductions in scope. The Financial
. Page 1
-----~
Committee would review the proposed cost allocation for each Co-Participant, as well
as examine recoupment costs due to Houston from past projects. Because La Porte
was not involved in the expansion, I volunteered for the Financial Committee, and
was appointed chairman.
Both committees met numerous times over the next few months, and eventually
reduced the scope and cost of the Project, as well as identifying costs not eligible for
reimbursement to Houston. The estimated cost to the Authority is now $542,880.
The City of Houston has prepared a new Amendment to Cost Sharing Agreement
(Restated and Amended) to reflect the proposed expansion, upgrade and changes in
ownership allocation with the Co-Participants.
The Agreement also incorporates the change in operator from contract to the City of
Houston. The City of Houston has agreed to be bound by similar contractual
language as previous contract operators, and has reduced contract operational costs
significantly. The new contract also allows the Co-Participants to convert back to
contract operations should the need arise.
The City of Houston requests that the new Amendment to Cost Sharing Agreement
(Restated and Amended) be approved by the governing bodies of the Co-
Participants before January 1, 2007 to allow the Houston to bid the Project and
award bids in the coming year. The Authority's share of the Project ($542,880) would
be payable after bids were tabulated and apparent low bidder identified, but before
award by the Houston City Council.
Estimated time schedule is as follows:
. Executed agreement with Co-Participants
. Advertise Project
. Open Bids
. Funds Due from Co-Participants
. Award Contract
If you have any questions, please advise
. Page 2
January 2007
February 2007
April/May 2007
May/June 2007
June/July 2007
PROJECTED CAPACITY DEMANDS
The Consultant has indicated that the total demand for the new capacity is 43 MGD, but
only 40 MGD will be available. To date, three (3) Participants have expressed a desire to
obtain an option on excess Authority capacity. Should the Authority have excess
capacity to sell, the price, as indicated by the new proposed Contract, is subject to
negotiation.
The La Porte Area Water Authority currently owns 4.2 MGD, with an additional 3 MGD
available by August 2001. With a total capacity of 7.2 MGD, the Authority can meet its
average daily demand, with a 2% growth rate, through 2040, and peak daily demand
through 2025. Current demand (including groundwater usage) averages 3.6 MGD, with
peak day at 4.5 MGD (See Table 3).
TABLE 3 - LP A W A WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
FLOW TYPE
2000 2002 2010 2020 2025 2030 2040
Daily Average
3.302 3.447 4.025 4.907 5.417 5.981 7.291
Daily Peak
4.513 4.710 5.501 6.706 7.403 8.173 9.964
Purchase of the Authority's percentage share of the expansion would cost $2,711,630,
and would supply the Authority's average daily demand beyond 2050. However, the
additional capacity would also result in 50% increase in O&M, emergency repair, and
overhead costs that are allocated according to the percentage of ownership. These
additional costs would be paid for over 25 years before the additional capacity is needed.
With the transfer of the 3-MGD from Galveston to the Authority scheduled in August
2001, the need for additional capacity is approximately .6 MGD. This additional capacity
will ensure that the Authority can meet its peak daily demand without exceeding its
capacity. Additionally, the increased maintenance costs would only increase
approximately 7%, and the Authority would have capacity beyond 2030.
Original pumping capacity at the Plant totaled 225 MGD. The Expansion Study
performed by the Consultant indicated that the firm pumping capacity, defined as the
capacity after failure of the largest single pump, is 200 MGD, a reduction of 25 MGD.
There are no plans to upgrade the pumping facilities to increase this capacity.
7
Due to the volume of this contract, a copy is
available for your review in the City Secretary's
Office.
Signature page attached from La Porte Area
Water Authority showing approval
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
AMENDMENT TO
COST SHARING AGREEMENT
SOUTHEAST WATER PURIFICATION PLANT
(REST A TED AND AMENDED)
(!6fL 7tJ1
r7l ~ ()t/:L7
Q119:2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
RE CIT ALS .. .................... a.................. .... a.. ..... a.. a. a.. ...... a. ..... a. a... ....... ........................... ........ ......... ..1
ARTICLE I
D EFINITI 0 NS . a..... a........ ~.......... ... .... ...... a. a. a.... ....... ........... a.................... a... ..... a..... a... a.. .....2
ARTICLE II
PAYMENT . ............... a....... ............ ........ a...... ........ .............. ... a... ............................... ... .......S
ARTICLE III
CONS TR U CTI ON............. ....... ................ .... ........... .................... a..... ................................6
ARTICLE IV
MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING FOR
200 MGD PROJECT COST .............................................................................................7
ARTICLE V
SUBSTANTIAL CO l\tIPLETI ON....................... ..............................................................8
ARTICLE VI
A CCESS TO PLANT AND RECORDS ..........................................................................9
ARTICLE VII
UNTREA TED WATER COSTS; CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS REGARDING ANNUAL O&M BUDGET .......................................9
ARTICLE VIII
COSTS FOR WATER LINE UPGRADE OR REPLACEMENT ..............................14
ARTICLE IX
INSURANCE................................ ..... ... ....... ............... ... .......................... ....... ....... .... ...... .15
ARTICLE X
ENTIRE AGREEMENT ........ ............... .............. ......... .......................................... ... .... ..15
EXHIBITS
Addendum to Operations and Maintenance for Southeast Water Purification Plant
Cl Schedule of Actual and Estimated Costs for Plant
H\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
9/19/2006
C2 Calculation of Unrecovered Original Capital Costs
C3 CW A Bond Debt Service
01 Schedule of Actual Costs of Pumping I Distribution
D2 Calculation of Unrecovered Capital Costs for Pumping I Distribution
F Calculation of Total Investment by Participant
Calculation of Total Gallons per Participant
G Beamer Road and Related Transmission Allocation
H (No Exhibit)
I Untreated Water Facilities Outstanding Debt
J Transmission Line Capacity Map
PARTICIPANT EXHIBITS
I Maps of Point of Delivery
II Demand, Pumping and Distribution Allocations and Costs
H\EWB\SOUTHEDOC
11
9/19/2006
Al\1ENDl\1ENT
TO
COST SHARING AGREEMENT
SOUTHEAST WATER PURIFICATION PLANT
(REST A TED AND AMENDED)
THIS AMENDMENT TO THE COST SHARING AGREEMENT SOUTHEAST
WATER PURIFICATION PLANT (REST A TED AND AMENDED) is made on the date of
countersignature shown below by and between the CITY OF HOUSTON (herein "Managing
Participant") and THE GULF COAST WATER AUTHORITY, THE CLEAR LAKE CITY
WATER AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NASSAU BAY, THE CLEAR BROOK CITY
MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, THE LAPORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY,
HARRIS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 55, THE CITY OF
PASADENA, THE CITY OF SOUTH HOUSTON, THE CITY OF WEBSTER, THE
CITY OF FRIENDS WOOD and BA YBROOK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1
(herein "Participants ").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Participants and the Managing Participant entered into vanous
Contracts for cost sharing in the construction and operation of the Southeast Water Purification
Plant ("Plant"), which had the initial production capacity of 80 million gallons of water per day
(MOD) during 1986-87; and
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
1
9/1912006
WHEREAS, the Participants and the Managing Participant entered into the Cost Sharing
Agreement, Southeast Water Purification Plant (Restated and Amended) (herein "Restated
Agreement") on or about June 22, 2001 to increase the production capacity of the Plant to 120
MOD; and
WHEREAS, the Participants and the Managing Participant have agreed to share in the
cost of a new modification of the Plant to increase its production capacity to 200 MOD and add
certain enhancements to the Plant; and
WHEREAS, the Participants have reviewed and approved the scope of the Project
described herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DEFINITIONS
All definitions included in the Restated Agreement shall apply unless the context requires
otherwise or in case the term is otherwise defined in this Amendment.
"200 MOD Project" includes certain improvements to the Plant that will increase its
Production Capacity to 200 MOD and the Plant's Pumping Capacity to 255 MOD. The "200
MOD Project" also includes certain upgrades for the Plant's existing facilities that will benefit
the Participants. A summary of these improvements and estimated costs is attached as Exhibits
"Cl" and "Di" hereto. The 200 MOD Project is an "Other Project" as defined in Section 3.7 of
the Restated Agreement.
"200 MOD Project Cost" includes:
a. Costs for facilities to increase the reliable capacity of the Plant from 120 MOD to
200 MOD to benefit only the Participants sharing in the increased 80 MOD
H:\EWB\SOUTHEDOC
2
9/19/2006
capacity of the Plant, including engmeenng, testing, construction, equipment,
legal services, contractor claims expenses, construction management, cost of
services performed by the Managing Participant's employees, and auditing
expenses. (Reference Exhibit Cl "Firm 200 MGD" Columns, herein these
expenses are "Pirm 200 MGD Expenses").
b. Costs for the upgrades to the facilities built to enhance the operation of the Plant
for the benefit of all Participants, including engineering, testing, construction,
equipment, legal services, contractor claims expenses, construction management,
cost of services performed by Managing Participant's employees and auditing
expenses. (Reference Exhibit Cl columns labeled "Enhancements (existing 120
MGD capacity only)", herein those expenses are "Enhancement Expenses").
c. Cost for the additional 55 MGD high service pump station to benefit only the
Participants sharing in the increased 80 MGD capacity of the Plant, including
engineering, testing, construction, equipment, legal services, contractor claims
expenses, construction management, cost of services performed by Managing
Participant's employees and auditing expenses. Reference Exhibit Dl, column
"High Service Treated Water Pumping" with rows labeled "Cost per Gallon New
Pump less Old Pump", "Incremental Cost-Original Capacity" and "Purchase of
Original Capacity" with details shown in Exhibit D2, columns labeled "200 MGD
Costs Purchased Capacity" and :'Increased $", herein these expenses are "Pump
Station Expenses").
H:\EWBISOUTHE.DOC
3
9/19/2006
Costs that are borne in common by paragraphs a, band c, such as engineering and auditing
expenses, will be apportioned among paragraphs a, b and c based on actual construction costs for
work describe in paragraphs a, band c.
"Plant Recoupment Cost" means certain unrecovered and redistributed capital costs for
the Managing Participant's initial construction of the Plant as shown on Exhibit Cl, row labeled
"Additional Capital Allocations Recoupment" and columns labeled "Existing Facilities," and
Exhibit C2, Treatment Plant (SEWPP), column labeled "Recoupment Increased $" hereto. The
Managing Participant affirms that Plant Recoupment Costs required under this Amendment are
based on the accounting for the prior capital costs for the Plant and are final for the Demand
Allocation of each Participant as shown on the Participant Exhibits II.
"Pumping and Distribution Recoupment Cost" includes:
a. Unrecovered capital costs for additional capacity in the Treated Water Pumping
Facilities and the Treated Water Transmission Facilities are as shown on Exhibits
"DI" and "D2." The Treated Water Transmission Facility additional capacity
capital costs are shown on Exhibit DI in rows labeled as follows, with the
capacity purchased specific to the area of service:
"Cost per Gallon - Existing Pipeline (96" C to D and Beamer)" and C to D
portion shown separately on Exhibit D2 in columns labeled "Balance of
Distribution $ (C to D) and New Allocation %".
"Purchase of Original Capacity (Dist. "B to C")" and detail shown on
Exhibit D2 in column labeled "Jun-OO Allocation $ (B to C)".
H:\EWBISOUTHEDOC
4
9/1912006
The Treated Water Pumping Facility additional capacity capital costs are shown
on Exhibit D 1 in row labeled as "Purchase of Original Capacity (Dist. "B to C")"
and further detailed on Exhibit D2 in column labeled "200 mgd costs Purchased
Capacity" .
b. Unrecovered capital costs for the Managing Participant's initial construction of
the Treated Water Pumping Facilities as shown in Exhibit Dlcolumn labeled
"High Service Treated Water Pumping" and row labeled "Incremental Cost-
Original Capacity" with details shown in Exhibit D2 High Service Treated Water
Pumping, column labeled "Increased $".
c. Unrecovered capital costs for construction of the Beamer Road transmission line
as shown on Exhibit "Dl".
The Managing Participant affirms that Plant Recoupment Costs and the Pumping and
Distribution Recoupment Costs required under this Amendment are based on the accounting for
the prior capital costs for the Plant and constitute all of the remaining unrecovered costs for the
Plant and that there are no further unrecovered costs to be recovered from any of the Participants
in the future other than those costs in Exhibit C2 in the column labeled "Balance of SEWPP" for
treatment plant costs, those costs in Exhibit D2 in the column labeled "Balance of HS PS" for
pumping costs, and any additional capacity purchased for distribution for the amount shown on
Exhibit D2 (B to C allocation is $.04660/gallon and C to D allocation is $0.0570/gallon).
ARTICLE II.
PAYMENT
Participants agree to make payment to the Managing Participant in the amounts shown on
Exhibit II, except payment for the 200 MOD Project Cost shall be based on the bid cost of the
H\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
5
9/19/2006
200 MOD Project plus a five percent construction contingency of the bid cost plus other non-
construction cost items included in the definition of "200 MOD Project Cost." After bids for the
200 MOD Project are opened and read, the Managing Participant shall provide each Participant
an accounting and invoice for the payment, which shall be due within 90 days of the
Participant's receipt of such accounting. A summary of the investment dollars and Demand
Allocation purchased per Participant is shown on Exhibit "F". Payments for Plant Recoupment
Costs and Pumping and Distribution Recoupment Costs are firm as shown in Exhibit II. The
Managing Participant shall use diligent efforts to obtain bids for construction of the 200 MOD
Project after execution of this Amendment by all Participants. At such time as the Managing
Participant has secured sufficient financing for the 200 MOD Project from the Participants, it
will award the construction contract and complete the 200 MOD Project. If the Managing
Participant does not timely receive the funds necessary to construct the 200 MOD Project and the
Project is canceled, then the Managing Participant shall promptly refund all funds paid by the
Participants to the Managing Participant for the 200 MOD Project Costs, plus interest thereon
compounded quarterly at the Interest Rate.
ARTICLE III.
CONSTRUCTION
During all working hours of the construction period, a Participant Director and anyone
authorized by such Director shall have access to the Plant premises and may inspect or review
the Plant and all engineering specifications and documents related to the Plant. The Managing
Participant shall present any change order(s) in the design, specifications or construction of the
200 MOD Project that exceed(s), cumulatively, the five percent construction contingency to the
Operating Advisory Committee for prior written approval. Failure to do so will result in the
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
6
9/19/2006
change order not being included in the 200 MOD Project unless and until written approval is
received from the Participants. Change orders caused under Force Majeure or acts of terror shall
be excluded from this provision.
ARTICLE IV.
MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING
FOR 200 MGD PROJECT COST
Each Participant's contribution for the 200 MOD Project Cost shall be kept by the
Managing Participant in an account with interest accruing to the benefit of each Participant at the
Interest Rate until it is spent for the 200 MOD Project Costs. Funds from the account may be
spent by the Managing Participant only for 200 MOD Project Costs.
Within 90 days of the formal acceptance of the completed construction of the 200 MOD
Project by the Managing Participant City Council, the Managing Participant Director shall cause
an accounting to be made of the 200 MOD Project Cost. A copy of the accounting shall be
delivered to each Participant within ten days after its completion. Additionally, within 30 days
after completion of the accounting, the Managing Participant shall engage an independent
certified public accounting firm from a selection of no more than three prequalified firms
selected by the Operating Advisory Committee to audit the Managing Participant's accounting.
As soon as the firm has completed the audit, the Managing Participant shall submit the audit to
all Participants.
The audit scope must be approved by the Operating Advisory Committee and, at a
minimum, shall state the difference between the estimated 200 MOD Project Cost paid by each
Participant, and each Participant's actual share of the 200 MOD Project Cost and must be in
accordance with good accounting practices and principles. If a Participant's share of the 200
MOD Project Cost, as determined by the audit, is less than the share paid by the Participant of
H\EWB\SOUTHEDOC
7
9/19/2006
the 200 MOD Project Cost, resulting in an overpayment by the Participant of its share, the
Managing Participant shall refund such difference with interest accrued, at the Interest Rate
compounded quarterly from the date deposited to the date of payment, to such Participant within
90 days of the date of the receipt of the audit. If a Participant's share of the 200 MOD Project
Cost, as determined by the audit, is more than the share of the 200 MOD Project Cost paid by the
Participant, resulting in an underpayment by such Participant of its share, the Participant shall
pay such difference, with interest determined at the Interest Rate compounded quarterly from the
date payment is required to the date of payment, to the Managing Participant within 90 days of
the date of the receipt of the audit by the Participant. Any of the Participants who disagree with
the audit shall have the right to pay any amounts under protest and seek refunds, plus reasonable
attorneys fees and court costs, in a court of appropriate jurisdiction or pursue any other available
remedy at law or in equity.
If the Participant does not pay its underpayment within such 90 day period, the Managing
Participant shall pay same and the Participant's Demand Allocation Factor shall be reduced, and
the Managing Participant's Demand Allocation Factor shall be increased, to reflect the
percentage deficit of the payment. The reduction in the Demand Allocation Factor shall be
determined by dividing the amount owed by the amount previously paid, with the resulting
percentage used to reduce the existing Demand Allocation Factor.
ARTICLE V.
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
When the Managing Participant Director gives the construction contractor notice of
Substantial Completion for the 200 MOD Project, the Managing Participant shall notify each
Hc\EWB\SOUTHEDOC
8
9/19/2006
Participant Director within ten business days thereafter and designate a day for the initial
operation of Plant at 200 MOD firm capacity.
ARTICLE VI.
ACCESS TO PLANT AND RECORDS
The Managing Participant shall provide the Participants full access to the Plant and to the
books and records of the Plant, including the 200 MOD Project, during all regular working
hours, including all engineering reports, design specifications, change orders, correspondence,
plant accounts, construction plan accounts or any other written document or instruction
associated with or pertaining to the construction of the Plant and the 200 MOD Project.
ARTICLE VII.
UNTREA TED WATER COSTS; CERTAIN AMENDMENTS
REGARDING ANNUAL O&M BUDGET
A. Participants that have increased their Demand Allocation (City of Friendswood, Clear
Brook City Municipal Utility District, City of Pasadena, and Gulf Coast Water Authority) may
pay the Managing Participant's standard contract rates for untreated water currently described in
the City of Houston Code of Ordinances Section 47-85 as amended from time to time for "Other
Project Water" produced by the 200 MGD Project (an "Other Project" is defined in Section 3.7
of the Restated Agreement). "Other Project Water" shall include all gallons in excess of 6022.5
million gallons per year taken by the Gulf Coast Water Authority, and all gallons in excess of
547.5 million gallons per year taken by the Clear Brook City Municipal Utility District, all
gallons in excess of 8,577.5 million gallons per year taken by the City of Pasadena and all
gallons in excess of 2,190 million gallons per year taken by the City of Friendswood. Payment
H'\EWB\SOUTHEDOC
9
9/19/2006
of the Managing Participant's standard contract rates for untreated water shall be referenced
herein as the "Other Projects Untreated Water Payment".
Alternatively, each Participant that has increased its Demand Allocation may elect to pay
an Existing Capital Charge, New Debt Service Expenses, and Untreated O&M Expenses (as
explained below), in lieu of making Other Projects Untreated Water Payments. Such payments
shall be referenced herein as "Other Projects Alternative Untreated Water Payments". Each
Participant that will be increasing its Demand Allocation must give the Managing Participant
notice of its payment election in writing by the Participant within 2 months of the effective date
of this Amendment. In the event no election is made by the Participant, the provisions for the
Other Projects Alternative Untreated Water Payments shall apply.
Payments for the Participants that have increased their Demand Allocations and certain
changes to their O&M Expense (Section 4.3 and Exhibits E" and "E" Pasadena) are as follows:
OTHER PROJECTS AL TERNA TlVE UNTREATED WATER PAYMENTS
One Time Raw Water Capital Cost Payment
Existing Capital:
Contribution
(Az/Dz x C)
(To be paid 60 days after notice from the Managing
Participant for the first delivery of water from the Plant
expansion.)
Changes made to O&M Expenses under Restated Agreement
New Debt
Service Expenses: (AZ/DI x E)
(for fiscal year)
(To be paid monthly for debt issued for new untreated
water facilities.)
Untreated Water
o & M Expense:
Same as provided in the Restated Agreement except
delete the '(AlEx D) x (1 + H)' term and the '(I X F)' term
but add the term '(A1fDl x B)'
HIEWB\SOUTHE.DOC
10
9/19/2006
(To be paid monthly beginning 30 days after delivery of
water beginning on the date the Plant expansion begins
delivery of water.)
These New Debt Service Expenses and Untreated Water 0 & M Expense shall be paid and
administered in accordance with procedures applicable to 0 & M Expense as provided in the
Restated Agreement.
OTHER PROJECTS UN'FREA TED WATER PAYMENTS
For Participants who have selected the Other Projects Untreated Water Payments, O&M
Expenses under the Restated Agreement shall be charged for the Other Projects Water they take
by deleting the '(AlE x D) x (I + H)' term and the '(I x F)' term, but add the term '(AI x R)'
where R is the Managing Participants contract rate for untreated water.
As used herein:
"AI" is the amount of treated water taken by a Participant during a fiscal year in excess of
its Demand Allocation under the Restated Agreement.
"A2" is 3,650 million gallons for the Gulf Coast Water Authority, 365 million gallons per
year for the Clear Brook City Municipal Utility District, 6,022.5 million gallons per year for the
City of Pasadena and 2,190 million gallons per year for the City of Friendswood.
"B" means all costs and expenses incurred by the Managing Participant (whether
incurred by the Managing Participant through its own staff or by independent contractors) for the
maintenance and operation of the untreated water facilities during the fiscal year, including, (i)
chemicals, labor, power, testing, permits, insurance, and other related costs, necessary for the
efficient maintenance and operation of the untreated water facilities as required under the
Restated Agreement and all applicable regulatory requirements and the preparation of costs of
the annual audit; (ii) necessary repairs and replacements to the untreated water facilities; and (iii)
R\EWB\SOUTHE DOC
11
9/19/2006
improvements and betterments to maintain the untreated water facilities in proper operation and
to comply with Restated Agreement and all applicable regulatory requirements. No cost to the
Managing Participant's government not directly related to the maintenance and operation of the
Untreated Water Facilities shall be included in factor "B".
"e" is the outstanding debt for all existing untreated water facilities listed in Exhibit letter
"I" adjusted for the calendar year preceding substantial completion, but excluding any debt
payments for existing untreated water facilities for which Participant has paid a capital
contribution.
"DI" is the total amount of surface water sold to the Managing Participant's water
customers during the fiscal year. As defined herein, Dt includes such raw water received at the
Managing Participant water treatment plants as well as the billable quantity (including take-or-
pay amounts as applicable) taken by the Managing Participant's untreated water customers, but
excludes line loss by evaporation, leakage, etc.
"Dz" is the total amount of surface water sold to the Managing Participant's water
customers during the Managing Participant's calendar year preceding substantial completion of
the 200 MOD Project. As defined herein, Dz includes the untreated water received at the
Managing Participant's water treatment plants as well as the billable quantity (including take-or-
pay amounts as applicable) taken by the Managing Participant's raw water customers, but
excludes line loss by evaporation, leakage, etc.
"E" is the annual debt service paid by the Managing Participant for all new untreated
water facilities for each fiscal year. As used herein "new untreated water facilities "means
untreated water facilities such as reservoirs, canals, pipelines and water rights that conveyor
H IEWB\SOUTHEDOC
12
9/19/2006
store untreated water but are not listed in Exhibit "I" as well as improvements, repairs, or
expenses for items listed on Exhibit "I", for which the Managing Participant issues new debt.
B. Section 3.4 of the Restated Agreement is amended to read as follows:
3.4.1 The Managing Participant shall submit for review to all Participants, not later than
60 days prior to the beginning of the Managing Participant's fiscal year, an estimated Annual
Budget consisting of various departmental components that constitute the O&M expenditures.
The components are described in greater detail in Exhibits "E", "E Pasadena" and "E LaPorte
Area Water Authority" (see Restated Agreement). The estimated Plant production will also be
provided, along with the breakdown of the production per Participant. The estimated Annual
Budget and the estimated Plant production will be used to calculate the annual estimated cost per
thousand gallons for the ensuing fiscal year. The final Annual Budget will be submitted to the
Participants when the Managing Participant's City Council approves its yearly budget.
3.4.2 A majority of Participants by weighted vote may object to any specific item of the
Annual O&M Budget. However, if such item is necessary for regulatory compliance, health,
safety or security, it shall be excluded from this provision and the Participants shall continue to
make payments for such item as provided by the Annual O&M Budget presented by the
Managing Participant (or such amended Budget acceptable to the Managing Participant and the
majority of the Participants by weighted vote). If such item is not necessary for regulatory
compliance, health, safety or security, the payment made for such item shall be the amount the
Participants by majority weighted vote decide and shall continue while the Participants pursue
dispute resolution procedures as described herein.
H.\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
13
9/19/2006
3.4.3 During the first month after the objection to items of the Annual O&M Budget,
the Participants shall pursue the dispute resolution procedures found in Section 5.15 of the
Restated Contract.
3.4.4 If the Participants are still at an impasse one month after the vote objecting to
item of the Annual O&M Budget, the Managing Participant shall procure a mediator acceptable
to a majority of the Participants by weighted vote. If the Participants reach no agreement after
mediation, then the amounts established above shall continue for the remainder of the Budget
year unless amended by the majority of Participants by weighted vote, including the Managing
Participant. All Participants shall make payment to the mediator as an O&M Expense.
3.4.5 As used herein "weighted vote" means a system of voting under which each
Participant's vote is weighted in proportion to the amount of water it has taken in the prior 12
months under the Restated Agreement. Thus, for example, if A has taken 10% of all the water
taken under the Restated Agreement, A is entitled to 10% of the voting strength. For voting
purposes, no Participant's shall count for more than 49% regardless of the amount of water
taken.
ARTICLE VIII.
COSTS FOR WATER LINE UPGRADE OR REPLACEMENT
It is anticipated that it will be necessary to replace one or more water lines joining the
Treated Water Transmission Facilities to the points of delivery of many of the Participants due to
an order of the Texas Department of Transportation that some of such facilities be removed from
State right-of-way or easement or other upgrade/replacement of the lines. Costs for any such
replacements, including the cost of real estate and right-of-way are the responsibility of the
Participants using the affected water line, and the Managing Participant shall charge the
H.\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
14
9/19/2006
Participants for their share of costs of such facility based on each Participant's Distribution
Allocation in such facility. Distribution Allocations under this Amendment for two of the lines
are shown on Exhibit "G". Distribution Allocations for the Beamer Rd., the existing 42," the
existing 24," and the 48" transmission lines are shown on Exhibit "J". The Managing Participant
shall be responsible for constructing the replacement facility when it has secured adequate
funding from the Participants.
ARTICLE IX.
INSURANCE
Section 5.1.4 of the Restated Agreement is deleted.
ARTICLE X.
ENTIRE AGREEl\1ENT
The Restated Agreement and the Amendment are the entire agreement of the parties. In
the event of any irreconcilable conflict between a provision of the Restated Agreement and this
Amendment, the provision of this Amendment shall prevail to the extent of conflict only.
The parties have executed this Amendment in multiple copies, each of which is an
original.
H\EWB\SOliTHE.DOC
15
9/19/2006
ATTESTISEAL:
By:
Name:
Title:
.,(~ ../
//'>~.,i,/,
'C N D 1-1 k:o RrLI<
C' <--
'fY c.)f:.Cf:Zr::TI1~y
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.OOC
i
/../
~~ -/ / (
',.
t:
THE CITY OF PASADENA
BY:~~
P'
Nam .-:]6H/U /VI,.. N L./J Uc
Title: MA y C(:L
22
9/19/2006
ATTEST/SEAL:
THE CITY OF SOUTH HOUSTON
B~~d~tl~^~.~
N e: aricela Barrera "-
Title: City Secretary
Date: 08/10/2007
By:
Name: oe Soto
Title. Mayor
Da Authorized:
Date Executed:
08/08/2007
08/10/2007
NOTE:
This Agreement is executed on the condition that the City of South Houston shall
have 5.5 years (66 months), interest free, to pay the $261,000.00 detailed in Exhibits
No. I & II.
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
23
911912006
A TTEST/SEAL:
----.
AS--
Name:
Title:
H ,EWB'SOUTHE DOC
CITY OF NASSAU BA Y
r:~~\ \ .
By: i ,JJL 6,
Name:
Title:
16
IOHN D. KENNEDV
'CITY MANAGER
CITY OF NASSAU,
9/1912006
A TTEST/SEAL:
Q~~/
Title: Board Secret ary-Treasurer
~\\\\\Uftl"11.
~,.... ~"Tr/f I,~
~~~'''''''''''''~4~- .,~
~~.?'~.t '-T.f~
==..., I :a ::
~3..\ ~ ~ =1:
- ;,'\ ~-
-:;.'" \ S ;::
~ ..... ~
~. ....-..... ~
~~ * '!\'~
"IIJ'~Ul\\,,\1
H.\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
GULF COAST WATER AUTHORITY
BY:~~
Name: W. W. Latimer
Title: Board fresident
17
9/19/2006
A TTEST/SEAL:
By: f/ cA:{~<re!~
-(Ji v '{_
Name: . / /
Title:
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
CLEAR LAKE CITY WATER
A UTHORlTY
//
\. /.
By: . / ../ Ct.!
Name: (j/ /
Title:
lE
.lid
9/] 9/2006
A TTEST/SEAL:
; ~
HIEWB\SOUTHE.DOC
rjli "'-, J 1"".
CLEAR BROOK CITY MUNICIPAL
UTILITY DISTRICT
~
By'
N~e: J,M. E
Title: ?FE. os.
19
9/19/2006
A TTEST/SEAL:
By:
Name: Steve Valerius
Title: President
By: ~~
Name: Alton . . .....
Title: Mayor
::P:;::::L
Name: Knox W. Askins
Title: City Attorney
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
THE LAPORTE AREA WATER
AUTHORITY
By:
Name: Chester Pool
Title: Secretary
CITY OF LAPORTE
By: vfJflJlffr4~-
Name: Martha A. Gillett
Title: City Secretary
20
9/19/2006
A TTEST/SEAL:
By: (]L- CP ~-x-
Name:
Title:
H\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
HARRIS COUNTY MUNICIPAL
UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 55
Zl
By: ~-<:'-fL/'
Name:
Title:
21
9/19/2006
A TIEST/SEAL:
By: (:;Li;,~ ~1.. u
Name: /,,~1 tl1-/~):.~- .s)-!~/.i.L-
Title: c~~~ ~{!,~ e;'t1
H:\EWB\SOUTIiE DOC
THE CITY OF WEBSTER
/---...
'"'
By: "
Name: PCA-A/1- ,fe't:';..C:-
Title: )1 ,,1 YCI/Z-
24
p~)s <""
9/1912006
A TrEST/SEAL:
@"~
J^ I '
B~ f(;~d ~2-'tP;
Deloris McKenzie, CMC
City Secretary
Date: 11/21/06
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
THE CITY OF RIENDSWOOD
c--~ ( .1
B~V-t/~
-navid J.H. Smith
Mayor
Date: 11/21/06
25
9/19/2006
ATTEST/SEAL:
By:~~A~
Name: DAl..)/t> {<.W5"l4A
Title: 51::(..~ej/ij...Y
...~
\\,\,,,ttt""tt,~
"'\\\n~\.. urlL!'r ""'"
" r\'{ .,~"'"'''' Y ^ ~
" ....'-1 .......'(""0 ", ..... v" ~
~ ~ ..,..';,~~" \ ~. " 0 /:.... ~ ~
~ ~)/,'>. .<r..t,'\."'~~
, "'~ t,e . ^"\~ ~
g -'::.::' {f.J.." ?'~...(.\ c=; S
= ('iO~ -.:
;0 y', .:.lo ~=
~ (j;. /r" .', 0 ::
- ..,.. ,'. ,..\ .....
.,~ 0..... !IIIo
\"1'.6-,..: .....1
~ ~ TEX~ _..~
"'" ~o(It'
""1. ..a'i
It,,,,.,,,.,,,,...-
H:\EWB\SOUTHE.DOC
BA YBROOK MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT NO.1
,.,,~ ~
( I' ' ! ". ." ,
By: eLl' L l . [
Name: ()A.\./d) A, CI..)fC/)/I'V'
Title: f' (( f:: 5 II) E IV T
26
9/19/2006
City Secretary
APPROVED:
;8# qc ~ cfJzt:U~J-7e/>r
Director, Public Works and Engineering
Department
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
'ifl;(~ " ~..
Assistant City A~ey
L.D. File No.l'} ~OC> 5'{}CJ () ~Or ~() I &e.> - CJ 1/
HEWB'.sOCTHE DOC
CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS
/311 W~
Mayor
COUNTERSIGNED BY:
~~.?~
City Controller~~'~
DATE COUNTERSIGNED:
~-,,</-t!/
27
9/19/2006
FORM 132.M
(Approving! Authorizing)
, ~S2117
City of Houston, Texas Ordinance No. ~tltJJ- Y,;:/7
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE COST SHARING AGREEMENT FOR THE SOUTHEAST WATER
PURIFICATION PLANT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HOUSTON AND THE GULF
COAST WATER AUTHORITY, THE CLEAR LAKE CITY WATER AUTHORITY,
THE CITY OF NASSAU BAY, THE CLEAR BROOK CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT, THE LAPORT AREA WATER AUTHORITY, HARRIS COUNTY
MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 55, THE CITY OF PASADENA, THE CITY OF
SOUTH HOUSTON, THE CITY OF WEBSTER, THE CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD AND
BA YBROOK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1; CONTAINING PROVISIONS
RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
* * * *
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the contract, agreement or
other undertaking described in the title of this Ordinance, in substantially the form as shown in
the document which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Mayor is
hereby authorized to execute such document and all related documents on behalf of the City of
Houston. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to attest to all such signatures and to affix the
seal of the City to all such documents.
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the
City's intent and objectives in approving such agreement, agreements or other undertaking
described in the title of this ordinance, in the event of changed circumstances.
Section 3. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to take all action necessary to enforce
all legal obligations under said contract without further authorization from Council.
Section 4. There exists a public emergency requiring that this Ordinance be passed
finally on the date of its introduction as requested in writing by the Mayor; therefore, this
Ordinance shall be passed finally on such date and shall take effect immediately upon its passage
and approval by the Mayor; however, in the event that the Mayor fails to sign this Ordinance
within five days after its passage and adoption, it shall take effect in accordance with Article VI,
Section 6, Ho~ston City Charter.
PASSED AND ADOPTED tbis /5!ifday of ~ 20 () 7
APPROVED this _ day of , 20
- 1 -
FORM 132.M
(Approving! Authorizing)
Mayor of the City of Houston, Texas
(Prepared by Legal Dept.
(EWB ajj 07/31/2007) Assistant City tomey "-.
(Requested by Michael S. Marcotte, Director, Public Works and Engineering Department)
(L.D. File Nos.0800S000S9001-11)
Pursuant to Article VI, Section 6, Houston City
foregoing Ordinance is AUG 2 1 (nO?
AYE NO
MA VOR WHITE
.... .... COUNCIL MEMBERS
,/ LAWRENCE
~r<< JOHNSON
~ CLUTIERBUCK
,/ EDWARDS
AI WISEMAN
v KHAN
HOLM
GARCIA
ALVARADO
BROWN
LOVELL
NORIEGA
GREEN
BERRY
CAPTION PUBU$HED IN DAlLY COURT CAPTION ADOPTED
REVIEW ,..~JJG'''''~1- 2007
DATE:
~;:;,.,.f'-"
- 2- MAY 017 Rev.M)4
ADDENDUM TO OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
FOR THE SOUTHEAST WATER PURIFICATION PLANT
A. Operation and Maintenance Services bv Manas!ine Participant.
During the Service Term, the Managing Participant shall provide full time management,
operation and maintenance for the Plant by means of the Managing Participant's employees.
The Managing Participant shall operate and maintain the Plant in accordance with Attachment
A-O&M Scope of Services and all applicable federal and state laws, regulations and permits.
B. Costs.
Cost of Services shall be calculated as provided in 3.4 and Exhibits "E", "E Pasadena"
and "E La Porte Area Water Authority", except:
1. Treated water will be produced at an electrical efficiency of no more than 1100
kilowatt hours per million gallons treated, determined on an annual basis.
Participants will not be required to make payment for electrical costs, on a per
million gallon basis, in excess of this maximum usage. Should the annual average
usage exceed the specified efficiency, reimbursement will be made by the
Managing Participant in the annual operations and maintenance cost true up.
2. Treated water will be produced at an efficiency determined by the maximum
treatment chemical usages per million gallons treated specified below (list), as
determined on an annual average basis:
Ferric Sulfate - 300.0 IbslMG
Lime - 150 IbslMG
Caustic - 15 IbslMG
Polymer - 30 IbslMG
S:lpweshareIPLANSEC1\Waler Supply and COSI Sharing ComractslTreated Water Supply ComractslSoulheasl Plamlsoulheast expansion
contraclloperatlOns addendumIADMSEWP091206accepled.DOC 1 September 12.2006
2
Fluoride - 30 lbs/MG (wet weight)
Aqueous Ammonia - 5.0 lbs/MG (dry weight)
Chlorine Ton Cylinder 30.0 lbs/MG (dry weight)
Participants will not be required to make payment for treatment chemicals in
excess of the specified maximum usages. Should an annual average usage exceed the
specified maximum usage, reimbursement for that cost will be made by the Managing
Participant in the annual operations and maintenance cost true up
3. The Managing Participant shall provide the draft Annual O&M Budget at least 30
days prior to the beginning of the Managing Participant's fiscal year.
Exhibits "E", "E LaPorte" and "E Pasadena" are amended such that during the
Service Term "Overhead Costs" shall include $600,000 for the Managing
Participant management, support and other indirect costs, but there shall be no
percentage payment for "Total Contracted Water Services." Each fiscal year the
Managing Participant may adjust the Overhead Costs by increasing this amount
by no more than the increase in the CPI Index for the previous fiscal year. "CPI
Index" means the U.S. Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the
Houston-Galveston Brazoria Texas Metropolitan Area.
C. Fines and Liquidated Damae-es.
Any fines imposed by the Texas Department of Health, TCEQ, EP A or any other state or
federal agency for non-attainment of drinking water quality, effluent discharge violations, or
improper handling and disposal of the sludge or waste materials shall be entirely paid by
Managing Participant.
S:lpweshareIPLANSECT\Water Supply and Cost Sharing ContractslTreated Water Supply ContractslSoutheast Plantlsoutheast expansion
contract\operations addendurnIADMSEWP09l506accepted.DOC 2 September 15,2006
3
In the event the Managing Participant believes the regulatory fine is unjustified because
the excursion was caused by a Force Majeure or other reason, it is the Managing Participant's
responsibility to contest the regulatory fine at its own expense.
The Operating Advisory Committee may withhold from payment as liquidated damages
amounts as shown in Attachment A, Table [ 1] - Treated Water Quality Standards for
exceedances of the specified water quality performance standards. Provided, however, the
Operating Advisory Committee shall not impose liquidated damages (i) if the raw water exceeds
the limits shown in Attachment A, Table [2] - Raw Water Parameters, and the Managing
Participant demonstrates "best efforts" for water treatment; or (ii) the Managing Participant
demonstrates that the exceedance was due to a Force Majeure.
(Each Participant shall be given credits for liquidated damages on the basis of its
percentage share of total Demand Allocation in the Plant).
p. Term.
The Service Term shall begin June 1, 2006 and last for five years. The Service Term is
automatically renewable for successive five-year terms unless either the Managing Participant
Director or a majority of the Participant Directors gives six months' notice of non-renewal.
In addition, Participants may terminate the Service Term, if they can secure another
service provider that can provide the same operation and maintenance services as described
herein for a lower cost than the Managing Participant and obtain a two-thirds majority of
Participants in favor of hiring the new service provider. No costs for the procurement of such
replacement service provider shall be assessed against the Managing Participant.
V oting under this Section D shall be one vote for each Participant. Each Participant must
show that the proper authority has approved its vote. The Managing Participant shall continue to
S;lpwesharelPLANSECnWaler Supply and Cost Sharing Contracts\Treated Water Supply COnlracts\Southeast Plant\southeast expansion
contraclloperalions addendum\ADMSEWP091206accepted.DOC 3 September 12.2006
4
provide service under the service terms of this agreement until the contract for the new service
provider is approved.
E. Close-Out
At the end of the Service Term, the Managing Participant shall return the Plant to its
condition when Managing Participant commenced maintenance, less normal wear and tear
during the Service Term. The Managing Participant shall ensure all equipment is fully
operational in accordance with the manufacturer's equipment specifications. Managing
Participant shall replenish inventory levels to the levels that existed at the time Managing
Participant commenced its maintenance of the Plant.
S:\pweshare\PLANSECT\Water Supply and Cost Sharing Contracts\Treated Water Supply Contracts\Southeast Plant\southeast expansIOn
contractloperatjons addendum\ADMSEWP09 I 206accepted.DOC 4 September 12.2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. General Requirements
The Managing Participant shall operate and maintain (O&M) the Treatment Facility and Water
Facilities to ensure the ability to treat water up to the design capacity of the plant in compliance
with all applicable laws and regulation. As described below, the Managing Participant shall be
responsible for all aspects of operation and maintenance, including providing all labor,
materials, and utilities necessary to treat up to the maximum design capacity of water daily. The
amount of water treated by the Managing Participant shall be determined by the custody
transfer flow meters located at the High Service Pump Station, as adjusted for in-plant uses
(plant potable water - PPW) through flow meters FMT5101 and FMT 5102. The Managing
Participant will assume the status of "generator," and will be responsible for the ultimate
disposal of all sludge and waste residuals resulting from the contract activities. In addition, any
lubricants or bulk chemicals proposed to be utilized at the Treatment Facility must comply with
ANSI/NSF Standards 61 and 60, respectively.
2. Performance Standards
The Managing Participant shall be responsible for meeting the following performance
standards:
. Meeting the Water Quality Performance Standards set forth in Schedule 1 of this Scope of
Services.
. Performing all of the Managing Participant's obligations as set forth in this Scope of
Services.
. Performing all related preventive maintenance in accordance with prudent industry
standards.
3. Description of Managing Participant Responsibilities
The Managing Participant shall operate and maintain the Treatment Facility in accordance with
all Applicable Law, the Scope of Services and Schedules 1 through 8 of this Attachment, and the
Cost Sharing Agreement. The Managing Participant is required to provide all necessary
corrective, preventative and predictive maintenance at the Treatment Facility and Water
Facilities. The Managing Participant shall, at a minimum, perform the following preventative
maintenance: (i) as required by the manufacturer of the equipment; and (ii) generally accepted
engineering, operational and maintenance practices for a facility of this size, type and age.
The Managing Participant accepts without limitation the Treatment Facility in "as is" condition.
During the Service Term of the Cost Sharing Agreement, the Managing Participant shall be
responsible for the operation and maintenance of the Treatment Facility. This will include
providing the staff and materials necessary to ensure that the Treatment Facility is capable of
and can produce up to the design capacity of water, 365 days per year.
S:\pweshareIPLANSEC1\Water Supply and Cost Sharing ContractslTreated Water Supply ContractslSoutheast Plantlsoutheast expansion
contractloperations addendumIADMSEWP091506accepted.DOC 5 September 15,2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1 Transition Services
Upon receiving a notice to proceed, the Managing Participant shall implement a transition plan
to begin to assume responsibility for the Treatment Facility. These transition services are
intended to ensure that the Managing Participant is fully able to commence operations of the
Treatment Facility on June 1, 2006. This shall include:
. Recruiting staff necessary to fill all positions required by the City of Houston Public Utility's
staffing plan;
. Monitoring plant operations for at least 21 days on multiple shifts prior to assuming
operational responsibility;
. Utilize the existing computerized maintenance management system that incorporates the
specifications and requirements described in Section 3.3 below.
. Updating within sixty (60) days of the effective start date the Emergency Response Plan and
a Risk Management Plan.
. Conducting an inventory and the quantities of materials, supplies, fuel and other
consumables on site at the time service commences.
3.2 Operation
The Managing Participant will operate the Treatment Facility to ensure that it treats up to the
plant design capacity of water each day as needed to supply sufficient flow and pressure to the
OAC members. The Treatment Facility shall be operated in accordance with the Cost Sharing
Agreement and attached Schedule 1. Operational decision making will reflect the following
minimum objectives:
. Protecting public health and welfare;
. Protecting the health and safety of the plant operating staff;
· Complying with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, including without
limitation, City, State, and Federal water quality and supply requirements and safety
requirements;
. Protecting the environment;
. Protecting and preserving the plant equipment and facilities; and
· Maximizing plant operational efficiency and minimization of operating costs.
The Managing Participant shall develop and implement procedures to ensure attainment of
these goals. The Managing Participant shall comply with the Water Quality Performance
Standards set forth in Schedule 1.
6
9/1 5/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City of Houston Public Utility's responsibilities include, but are not necessarily limited to:
. Treating raw water and distributing potable water to the Co-Participants and the City of
Houston distribution system in response to their demand requirements, in conformance to
all applicable laws and the Cost Sharing Agreement;
· Providing a Texas Class" A" licensed Water Operator who will be in charge of the operation
of the Treatment Facility. This operator will be a full-time employee dedicated solely to the
Treatment Facility and will also be responsible during evening call-outs.
· Staffing the Treatment Facility in accordance with the City of Houston Public Utility's
proposed staffing plan and at a minimum consistent with the requirements of the State of
Texas. This shall include at least one Texas Class "B" licensed Surface Water Operator or
higher onsite during each shift.
· Providing all materials, both durable and consumable, and supplies necessary to operate
and maintain the Water Facilities, including but not limited to chemicals, utilities, residuals
management, rolling stock, and consumables. The payment for all such items is described
in the Cost Sharing Agreement;
· Maintaining: 1) a minimum water level in the ground storage tanks to satisfy all regulatory
requirements; 2) discharge pressures from the Treatment Facility to meet all regulatory
requirements; and 3) a goal of a minimum delivery point pressure of 35 psig at each Co-
participant's delivery point.
· Add additional chemicals as needed to address periodic water quality problems;
· Obtain laboratory services to ensure compliance with all applicable law and to monitor and
manage the treatment process. The Managing Participant will develop and implement an
appropriate QA/QC plan for all such work
· The Managing Participant will be responsible for maintaining the lagoon in a condition such
that it can be used for its intended purpose. Maintenance of the lagoon facility includes
maintenance of all side slopes and removal of all rooted vegetation. The Managing
Participant will be responsible for the proper handling and disposal of all materials
removed from the lagoon.
· The Managing Participant is responsible for operating and maintaining the on-site monofill
in compliance with the operating plan contained in the Permit Application and Site
Development Plan for the Southeast Water Purification Plant Onsite Sludge Disposal Area,
dated February 1992 and submitted to the Texas Department of Health as well as the current
operating permit Number 03523. Furthermore, the Managing Participant will be
responsible for maintaining the side slopes, vehicle road ramp as well as the paved road and
sludge processing area. The Managing Participant will be responsible for pest and fire ant
control at the sludge lagoon and monofill.
7
9/] 2/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
. Responding immediately to emergency or disaster situations in a manner equal to or better
than existing plans, and in accordance with the current "Emergency Operations Plan of the
Department of Public Works and Engineering" and the approved Emergency Response and
Risk Management plans.
. Providing emergency repair services to the Water Facilities and related infrastructure. This
may include repairing main breaks and valves between the Treatment Facility and the
points of delivery to each co-participant. The Managing Participant may subcontract that
work to qualified firms, if deemed necessary. The Managing Participant may use its own
labor to make the repairs.
. Conducting preventive maintenance on the Co-Participant delivery point locations
including: maintaining fencing and security; grounds maintenance; and maintaining the
valve vault, the flow control valves and the flow and pressure transmitters to the Treatment
Facility when construction has been completed. The Managing Participant shall be
responsible for the operation, maintenance and calibration of the flow control devices and
the flow and pressure transmitters that transmit signals to the Treatment Facility. The
Managing Participant shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance and calibration of
the Co-Participant flow meters and flow transmitters that transmit signals to the City of
Houston water billing department;
. Maintaining professional responsible working relationships with the Co-participants,
regulatory authorities, material and service vendors, the media and the public.
. Providing and maintaining adequate security at all Treatment Facility facilities, systems,
buildings, plants and equipment which is inside the fence line.
. Providing unrestricted access by the Co-participants to the Water Facilities to observe
operations and evaluate the condition of said facility. This will include allowing the Co-
participants to test and audit the performance of the equipment at Water Facilities.
3.3 Maintenance
The Managing Participant shall be responsible for all aspects of maintenance at the Water
Facilities, including corrective, preventative, and predictive maintenance. This may include
emergency repairs at the Water Facilities sites or to the mains and point of service connections,
replacement of certain equipment and capital improvements. The Managing Participant shall
use its professional judgement in determining what additional maintenance is appropriate and
necessary.
The Managing Participant will be required to implement maintenance procedures to ensure
attainment of the objectives set forth in this Scope of Services. This includes, at a minimum,
responding to corrective maintenance needs in a timely and appropriate manner.
The Managing Participant shall provide necessary corrective, preventative and predictive
maintenance for all systems, structures and equipment at the plant. In addition, the Managing
Participant shall:
8
9/12/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
· Perform all necessary preventive maintenance on installed cathodic protection at the
Treatment Facility. All needed repairs must be made to ensure the integrity and
operability of the system.
· Inspect annually all tanks and piping systems, including the ground storage tanks and
clear well. Piping that is equipped with heat tracing shall be inspected prior to winter
conditions, and repaired as necessary.
· Inspect annually, at a minimum, tank level indicators, including the two ground storage
tanks, and calibrate and adjust the level indicator as necessary.
· Perform preventative maintenance on the 138 KV Substation, High and Medium Voltage
Equipment as required by standard industry practice.
· Perform maintenance on all chlorine feed systems, including relief-valves, evaporators,
and vacuum regulators on a bi-annual basis, per manufacturer's specifications. This
shall include complete disassembly of the units and repair or replacement as necessary.
· Perform maintenance on flexible metal tubing used to connect chlorine supply cylinders
to piping systems, according to manufacturer's and the Chlorine Institute's
specifications, and replace on an annual basis or sooner if needed.
· Perform annual vibration analysis testing of critical mechanical equipment. The
Managing Participant shall perform interpretation and analysis of test results and
submit an evaluative written report in an approved format to the OAC, including
necessary action plans. The Managing Participant shall promptly address any
deficiencies identified in the testing report.
· Perform annual oil sampling of critical mechanical equipment. The Managing
Participant shall perform interpretation and analysis of test results. The Managing
Participant shall promptly address any deficiencies identified in the testing report.
· Inspect, maintain and test all backflow preventers within the Water facilities operated or
maintained by the Managing Participant in accordance with Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requirements, and at least annually perform calibration
and testing.
· Perform maintenance on the on-site City of Pasadena Metering Station, which shall
include all valves and flow meters.
· Touch up paint on any equipment or facilities as needed to minimize corrosion and
maximize service life.
· Maintain the Sludge Lagoon and monofill free from excessive vegetation and
overgrowth. The side slopes of the monofill will be maintained for stability and to
prevent erosion.
9
9/1 2/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
. Conduct annual infrared inspections of all motor control centers, transformers and
motor connections greater than 60 hp.
. Perform periodic calibration of instruments m accordance with manufacturer's
recommended procedures.
. Repair expansion joints to maintain integrity of concrete structures and prevent leaks.
. Operate, maintain and calibrate, or arrange for the operation, maintenance and
calibration of the High Service Pump Station discharge custody transfer flow meters and
the two in- plant potable water (PPW) flow meters FMT5101 and FMT 5102; and
. Operate, maintain and calibrate, or arrange for the operation, maintenance and
calibration of the off-site Co-Participant's flow meters and the flow transmitters that
transmit signals to the City of Houston's water billing department. The Managing
Participant shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance and calibration of the
flow control devices and the flow and pressure transmitters that transmit signals to the
Treatment Facility.
. The Managing Participant will be responsible for maintaining the physical facilities of
the Treatment Facility. This will include at a minimum:
. All spare parts, materials and supplies shall be stored in an orderly manner;
. Regular pest control including fire ant control;
. As needed pest control for capture and removal of wild hogs and any other pest animals
which may cause destruction of property or endanger treatment processes;
. Repair of all plumbing and piping leaks and failures;
. External cleaning, such as pressure washing of the ground storage tanks and similar
facilities as needed;
. Walls will be cleaned and touch up paint applied as necessary
. Tile walls will be washed as needed;
. Repair of cracks or spauled concrete and expansion joints;
. Railroad track beds and fence lines will be treated with herbicides as necessary to
prevent weed growth;
. Weed control will be performed m paved areas to keep cracks and joints clear of
vegetation;
10
9/12/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
. Grass and landscaped areas will be maintained in an attractive, neat manner, which may
be used for open houses and plant tours. For purposes of this section, maintenance of
the ditch along the southerly side of the property, outside the fence is included;
. Grass will be mowed as needed during the growing season from April through
November 15th of each year; and
. Grass will be mowed and weed control will be performed on a regular basis at the Co-
Participant delivery point locations.
3.4 Reporting Requirements
All reports and data shall also be saved in electronic format. The reports at a minimum shall
include:
. A monthly operations report summanzmg daily raw water quality, finished water
quality, staffing changes, chemical and utility usage, maintenance activities, (summary
of preventative maintenance projects started, completed, backlogged, corrective
maintenance activities undertaken), sludge production, sludge disposal locations and
such other information appropriate for the OAC to understand performance, operations
and maintenance at the Treatment Facility. Sludge that is taken off-site must be
disposed of at facilities that are properly operated and licensed by the State to accept
such sludge. Sludge disposal manifests must be maintained on-site during the entire
period of this Agreement.
. Monthly list of the warranty status of any warranties for components purchased and
installed by the Managing Participant or a third party.
. A monthly report of the actual chemical purchases and invoiced amounts for any
chemicals utilized at the Water Facilities.
. Quarterly report summarizing maintenance activities completed in the last quarter and
scheduled to be undertaken for the upcoming quarter. This should also include
proposed repair and replacement projects.
. Annual report summarizing the operations over the previous year, major issues moving
into the upcoming year, including but not limited to recommended modifications or
improvements to the facility, anticipated modifications enhancements to maintenance
procedures.
. Any reports required of water producers under applicable law.
. Any reports requested by the OAe to verify operation and maintenance issues, or
document special circumstances.
I)
9/12/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
SCHEDULE 1
Treated Water Quality Performance Standards
PURPOSE
The purpose of this schedule is to identify the Treated Water Quality Performance Standards that the
Managing Participant is required to meet.
WATER TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS
All analytical methods used to demonstrate compliance shall be according to approved
methods by EPA. In the event that a particular parameter does not have a method
approved by EPA, methods currently accepted by the industry shall be used.
The Managing Participant shall operate the SEWPP in such a manner that the SEWPP will produce
Treated Water that is in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. The requirements
were developed to maintain consistency with current internal requirements, minimize public health risks,
allow for flexibility to meet future regulations and eliminate or reduce the need for major modifications to
the SEWPP in the near future.
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
1. The Managing Participant will ensure performance of all sampling, analysis and record keeping
required by USEPA and the TCEQ. Managing Participant will be responsible for all monitoring, up to
and including the point of entry into the distribution system. USEPA and TCEQ approved laboratory
procedures will be followed.
2. For any analytical laboratory work performed at an outside or offsite laboratory, the Managing
Participant shall use an approved testing laboratory.
3. The Managing Participant will be responsible for compliance with all currently effective monitoring
requirements as well as those becoming effective during the Service Term of the Cost Sharing
Agreement. The Managing Participant will perform other tests for process control as necessary.
12
9/1212006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
SCHEDULE 1
Treated Water Qualitv Performance Standards
4. Compliance monitoring parameters which are currently effective and required at the SEWPP (Entry
Point 002 in PWS 10 No. 1010013) include the list of samples and analyses outlined in a document
titled, "Drinking Water Samples to be collected by the TCEQ in 2000," These samples are collected
and analyzed by TCEQ personnel. The Managing Participant will be responsible for all labor costs
associated with annual compliance monitoring.
5. Also included in the current required monitoring are all parameters associated with the Surface Water
Treatment Rule (SWTR).
6. Current TCEQ approved TlO values, shall be used when calculating the CT value.
7. Managing Participant is responsible for all costs associated with the sampling, analysis, report
completion and submission.
8. Lead and Copper Rule compliance monitoring at the SEWPP includes bi-weekly monitoring and
reporting of the following Water Quality Parameters at the point of entry into the distribution system.
The lead and copper rule related water quality parameter report is to be completed by the 10th day of
the month following the quarterly reporting period.
a. Alkalinity as CaCOa
b. pH
c. Calcium as Ca
d. Conductivity
e. Temperature
9. Radionuclides are sampled by TCEQ every four (4) years at each point of entry on a quarterly
schedule. The SEWPP will be sampled during a total of eight (8) quarters in two (2) different years
during the Service Term of the Cost Sharing Agreement. These analyses include:
a. Gross Alpha
b. Total Radium
c. Radium 226
d. Radium 228
e. Total Uranium
f. Gross Beta
13
9/J 2/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
SCHEDULE 1
Treated Water Qualitv Performance Standards
10. In addition to all other compliance related monitoring, the Managing Participant will be responsible for
the following analyses of record.
Analysis/Report
Frequency
1 . Complete chemical analysis report
Biweekly
2. Heterotrophic plate counts at each process
through distribution:
A. Settled
B. Filtered
C. Distribution (see Table 1 -Item 15 for limits)
D. Raw
Weekly
Weekly
Daily
Daily
3. Total Coliform Counts
A. Raw
B. Settled
C. Filtered
D. Distribution (see Table 1 - Item 14 for limits)
Daily
Weekly
Weekly
Daily
4. Giardia and Cryptospordium
Monthly
A. Raw
B. Distribution (see Table 1 -Items 27 and 28 for limits)
5. Algae Counts and Enumeration
Biweekly
A. Raw
B. Distribution (see Table 1 -Item 24 for limits)
6. Trihalomethanes
A. Distribution
Biweekly
7. Trihaloacetic Acids (HAAs)
(see Table 1 - Item 26 for limits)
A. Distribution
Biweekly
]4
9/1212006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
SCHEDULE 1
Treated Water Qualitv Performance Standards
11. Process control monitoring will be performed by Managing Participantat a minimum of the following
grab sample tests and frequencies.
Parameter/Location
Frequency
1. pH
A. Raw (Once/day)
B. Settled
C. Filtered
D. Distribution (see Table 1 - Item 18 for limits)
Every 4 hours
2. Turbidity:
Every 4 hours
A. Raw (Once/day)
B. Settled (see Table 1 - Item 3 for limits)
C. Clearwell (see Table 1 - Item 1 for limits)
D. Individual Filters (see Table 1 -Item 2 for limits)
3. Alkalinity
Daily
A. Raw
B. Settled
C. Filtered
D. Distribution
4. Jar Tests Weekly
Using D/DBP protocol to establish diminishing returns for
TOC.
5. T.O.N. Daily, Mon-Fri
A. Raw
B. Distribution (see Table 1 -Item 30 for limits)
6. Hardness
Daily
A. Raw
B. Settled
C. Filtered
D. Distribution
7. True Color (City of Houston Method)
Daily
A. Raw
B. Settled
C. Filtered
D. Distribution (see Table 1 - Item 31 for limits)
15
9112/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
Parameter/location
8. Fluoride
A. Distribution (see Table 1 - Item 21 for limits)
9. Filter Profile (Each filter element)
10. Chloride
A. Raw
B. Distribution
11. Calcium
A. Raw
B. Distribution
12. Ammonia
A. Raw - Total
B. Distribution - Free (see Table 1 -Item 28 for limits)
13. Chlorine Residual- Free and Total
A. Raw
B. Settled
C. Filtered
D. Distribution (see Table 1 -Item 13 for limits)
16
Frequency
Daily
Weekly
Daily
Daily
Daily
Every 4 hours
9/1 2/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
TABLE 1 - TREATED WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Treatment Water treatment
Performance Monitoring and
Standard Subject Reporting
to Liquidated Requirement Subject
Reporting Damages up to a to Uquidated
Frequency or Maximum of Damages up to a
Point of Monitoring Reason Data Monitoring $10,OOOIday Total Maximum of
Parameter Compliance Value (1) Freauency Needed Responsibility $l,OOOIdav Total
1. Turbidity Clearwell Less than 0.100 NTU, more Continuously 15 minute Certified
than 95% of the 15 minute interval Operator X
intervals. Less than 0.300 NTU readings, report
100% of the time. dailv
2. Turbidity Individuallilter Less than 0.100 NTU more Continuously 15 minute Certified X
effluent lines than 95% of the 15 minute intervals Operator
intervals, less than 0.300 NTU
100% of the time.
3. Turbidity Individual filter A maximum of 0.300 NTU spike W~hin 15 Intervals not Certified X
effluent lines following a filter backwash and minutes exceeding one Operator
recovery to less than 0.100 following a minute. report
NTU within 15 minutes from filter daily
initiating Iilter operations backwash
and recovery
4. Turbidity Sedimentation Daily average of less than 2.00 4 hour Daily Average Certified X
Basin effluents NTU at all times for the intervals Report Operator
combined basin effluent
5. Giardia and High Service Surface Waler Treatment Rule Daily Daily lor Certified X
virus Pump Station requires a total of 3 log Giardia demonstration Operator
inactivation discharge and virus (4 log) ofCT
removal/inactivation compliance for
each parameter
Provide a minimum of .5 log Daily
Giardia and a 2-log virus
inactivation using disinfectant
residual
6. Temperature Raw Water Degrees C Daily Lowest value Certified X
each day for Operator
CT calculation
17
9/1 2/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
-- Water Treatment Water treatment
Performance Monitoring and
Standard Subject Reporting
to Liquidated Requirement Subject
Reporting Damages up to a to Liquidated
Frequency or Maximum of Damages up to a
Point of Monitoring Reason Data Monitoring $10,OOOIday Total Maximum of
Parameter Compliance Value (1) Frequency Needed Responsibility $l,OOOIday Total
7. Peak Hour Flow High Service MGD Daily Highest value Certified X
Pump Station each day for Operator
discharae CT calculation
8. Disinfectant Each Report Continuous Lowest value Certified X
residual Disinfection each day for Operator
Zone CT calculation
9. TOC- Raw Prior to Report Monthly Enhanced TCEO X
Water chemical coagulation Approved
addition compliance Laboratory
10. TOC- Raw Influent to Report Weekly Enhanced TCEO X
Water Treatment coagulation Approved
Module conloliance Laboratory
11. TOC- Treated High Service Report Monthly Enhanced TCEO X
Water Pump Station coagulation Approved
Discharae compliance Laboratory
12. TOC- Treated High Service Report Weekly, Enhanced TCeO X
Water Pump Station Actual Plant coagulation Approved
DiSCharge compliance Laboratory
13. Chlorine High Service 2.50 mgll (minimum) to 3.90 Continuous Grab samples Certified X
Residual Pump Station mgll (maximum), +/-0.10 mgll as specified Daily Operator
Combined discharge and sufficient concentration to by Owner
meet CT requirements of the
Surface Water Treatment Rule
(SWTR). Owner will have the
option to specify a free residual
of up to 3.50 mg/L on an
intermittent basis under
emergency conditions to
address microbiological
problems in the transmission
and distribution system or in
response to treatment process
needs
18
9/12/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
14. Total Coliform High Service Not detected 100% of time. In Daily Daily based on TCEO X
Pump Station compliance when sample result grab samples approved
discharge is negative. If initial test is laboratory
positive, in compliance when
confirmation test is neaative.
15. Hetrotrophic High Service Less than 25 colony forming Daily TCEO X
Plate Count Pump Station units; R2A; 5 days, 26 degree approved
(HPC) discharge C; or other method approved by laboratory
Owner
16.Fecal Coliform High Service Not detected 100% of time. In Daily Daily based on TCEO X
Pump Station compliance when sample result grab samples approved
discharge is negative. If initial test is laboratory
positive, in compliance when
confirmation test is neaative.
17. pH High Service Maintain pH greater than 0.00 Continuously Daily Certified X
Pump Station to 0.20 + Stability pH (pHs) not Operator
discharae exceedina a oH of 8.60.
18.pH High Service Report Daily Daily grab Certified X
Pump Station samples Operator
discharae
19.Alkalinity High Service See Langelier Index Daily Daily Certified X
Pump Station requirements Operator
discharae
20. Manganese High Service Less than 0.050 mglL Once Per Once Per TCEQ X
Pump Station Month Month approved
discharge laboratorv
21. Iron High Service Less than 0.200 mglL Once Per Once Per TCEQ X
Pump Station Month Month approved
discharae laboratorv
22. Fluoride Clearwell 0.850 +/-0.100 mgIL Continuous Once per day Certified X
Operator
23. Arsenic Raw Water Report Monthly Monthly TCEQ X
approved
High Service Report Monthly Monthly laboratory X
Pump Station
discharae
24. TTHMs High Service Less than 64.0 uglL daily max. Twice per Twice per TCEQ X
Pump Station month month approved
discharae laboratorv
19
10/1 112006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
25. HAAs High Service Less than 48.0 ug/L daily max. Twice per Twice per TCEQ X
Pump Station month month approved
discharae I laboratorv
26. Giardia (2) High Service Report Monthly Monthly grab EPA Method X
Pump Station samples 1623 or most
discharae current method
27.Crytosporidium High Service Report Monthly Monthly grab EPA Method X
(2) Pump Station samples 1623 or most
discharae current method
28. Free Ammonia Plant Influent Report Daily Reported daily Certified X
Operator
High Service No more than a 0.500 mg/L as Daily Reported daily X
Pump Station N increase over plant influent
discharae value
29. Nitrite Plant Influent Report Twice a Twice a month Certified X
month Operator
High Service No more than a 0.500 mg/L Twice a Twice a month X
Pump Station increase over plant influent month
discharae value
30. Threshold High Service Less than 2.0 T.O.N. 100% of Daily during Daily during Certified X
Odor Number Pump Station time odor event odor event, Operator
discharge otherwise otherwise
Weeklv Weekly
31. True Color High Service Less than 5.0 Pt Co Units Daily Daily Certified X
Pump Station 100% of the time Operator
discharae
(1) Absence of data to demonstrate compliance with these requirements shall be assumed to be non-compliance unless Managing Participant can demonstrate that the perfonnance
was met and that every reasonable effort has been made to maintain and/or restore the collection of data.
(2) Sufficient sample must be analyzed to ensure laboratory achieves detection limit below any current or future regulatory trigger.
Analysis procedures shall meet the following criteria:
1. Analysis for Cryptosporidium to be completed by a method and laboratory approved by the U.S. EPA and City of Houston.
Note: TOC analysis method with a detection limit of 0.5 mgl/.
20
10111/2006
ATTACHMENT A
O&M SCOPE OF SERVICES
SCHEDULE 1
Treated Water Quality Performance Standards
TABLE 2
RAW WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PARAMETERS.
Parameter
-NTU
as CaC03
as CaC03
Minimum Value
1
60
60
7.0
60.0
5
0.1
10.0
1.0
<0.01
1
100
<0.03
5.0
1.0
<0.01
<0.03
<0.01
1.0
100
2
o
<0.01
Maximum Value
120
150
150
8.5
10.0
35
1.2
55.0
6.0
0.60
40
500
3.0
50.0
6.0
0.30
2.50
0.30
15
350
50
2
1.5
Notes:
1. Any raw water quality parameter not listed in this table must be demonstrated at
the City of Houston Public Utility's expense to result in a condition such that the
Treatment Facility is not capable, despite "best efforts", including but not limited
to addition of chemicals, of meeting one or more of the water quality standards
specified in Table 1.
2. These values are provided only for the purposes of determining whether credits
shall apply for exceedance of any water quality performance standard described in
Table 1.
21
101J 1/2006
Enhancements (existing 120 Total New
Firm 200 MGD mgd capacity only) Construction
New Existing New Existing Enhancements 80 mgd Enhancements
SEWPP Expansion Costs Construction Facilities Construction Facilities 200 mad EXDsnsion 120 mad Total
Forebay $ 623,086 $ (623,086)
Existing Raw Water Modifications $ 533,997 $ 800,996 $ 1,334,993 $1,334,993 $1,334,993
New Raw Water Pipeline 1,269,163 $ - 1,269,163 1,269,163 1,269,163
TM No 1 & lift Stations 1 & 2 $1,189,491 - 1,189,491 1,189,491 1,189,491
Treatment Module #2 17,269,339 - 17,269,339 17,269,339 17,269,339
Chemical Feed Facility (Disinfection) 12,996,804 258,661 - (258,661) 12,996,804 12,996,804 12,996,804
New Ground Storage Tank 8,773,994 8,773,994 8,773,994 0 8,773,994
Existing Ground Storage Tank Modifications 2,946,173 2,946,173 - 2,946,173 2,946,173
Filtration/Clearwell & Filter Complex ~ 10,533,623 - 10,533,623 10,533,623 10,533,623
New Transfer Pump Station No.2 10,578,790 - 10,578,790 10,578,790 - 10,578,790
Transfer Pump Station No.1 Modifications 124,458 124,458 124,458 124,458
High Service Pump Station (Exh D1 ) - - - -
Clarifier 192,729 (192,729) -
Backwash Waste Pump System 2,874,527 - 0 2,874,527 2,874,527 2,874,527
Sludge Processing Facility 2,011,677 249,437 - (249,437) 2,011,677 2,011,677 2,011,677
Overflow Basin & Sludge Lagoon - 824,135 - (824,135) -
Generator Installation 203,986 305,978 509,964 509,964 509,964
Plant Security 3,346,004 5,019,006 8,365,009 8,365,009 8,365,009
Fire Alarm System - 752,197 752,197 - 752,197 752,197
Operations Building & Electrical Subs - 2,544,906 - (2,544,906) - -
Control/Electrical Com pies (Architect 4,343,486 - 4,343,486 4,343,486 - 4,343,486
Instrumentation and Controls 2,559,669 - 2,559,669 2,559,669 2,559,669
Subtotal $78,484,550 $4,692,954 $9,948,808 ($4,692,954) $88,433,358 $10,209,966 $74,400,564 $3,822,828 $88,433,358
EXHIBIT C1 (200 mgd )
SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PLANT
A
Diane"lo27s"lo20Summary_90"Io25%20Modified_No%20UV _Rev3%20082906(1 ).xls
Enhancements (existing 120 Total New
Firm 200 MGD mgd capacity only) Construction
New Existing New Existing Enhancements 80 mgd Enhancements
SEWPP Expansion Costs Construction Facilities Construction Facilities 200 mad Expansion 120 mgd Total
Engineering -
Cost Allocation Analysis $292,674 $37,100 $329,n4 $38,074 $2n,445 $14,256 $329,n4
Storm Sewer System Hydraulic AnI: 49,815 6,315 56,130 6,480 47,223 2,426 56,130
Facility Expansion Evaluation 390,500 - 390,500 - 390,500 - 390,500
Programming 900,000 300,000 1,200,000 - 900,000 300,000 1,200,000
O&M Training - -
Regulatory Issues - - - -
UVT Testing - - - -
CT Analysis 27,186 - 27,186 - 27,186 - 27,186
CFD Modeling (GST's & UV Inlet) 45,696 5,792 51 ,488 5,944 43,318 2,226 51 ,488
Geotechnical 131,339 - 131,339 131,339 131,339
Surveying 80,157 - 80,157 80,157 80,157
Storm water Pollution Prevention 20,471 - 20,471 - 20,471 - 20,471
Technical Review Committee 21,300 2,700 24,000 2,nl 20,192 1,037 24,000
UV Pilot Testing 7,455 945 8,400 970 7,067 363 8,400
Filter Pilot Testing 223,500 - 223,500 223,500 223,500
Air Stripping for pH 155,312 19,688 175,000 20,204 147,231 7,565 175,000
Wetlands Delineation 21,032 - 21,032 21,032 21,032
Electrical Services 370,500 - 370,500 - 370,500 - 370,500
Pump Station Surge Model - - - -
Co-Participant Flow Control Valve - - - -
Sludge Disposal Site - - - -
Bid-Document Reproduction - - - -
Tracer CT Study - - - -
Record Drawings - - - -
Balance of Amendment #2 - Basic 355,000 45,000 400,000 46,182 336,527 17,291 400,000
Balance of Amendment #2 - Additio 1,030,637 130,645 1,161,282 134,074 9n,007 50,200 1,161 ,282
Phase I Preliminary Design 1,886,362 239,118 2,125,480 245,395 1,788,204 91,881 2,125,480
Phase I Final Design 3,699,767 468,988 4,168,755 481,299 3,507,248 180,208 4,168,755
Balance of Amendment #1 - Basic 1 2,123,045 269,120 2,392,165 276,185 2,012,571 103,409 2,392,165
Lab Tests, Legal, City Canst Mgt. 7,063,610 895,393 7,959,002 918,897 6,696,051 344,055 7,959,002
Construction Management (Estimate) 5,324,996 675,004 6,000,000 692,723 5,047,907 259,370 6,000,000
$24,220,355 $3,095,806 $27,316,161 $2,869,197 $23,072,676 $1,374,288 $27,316,161
Subtotal Construction + Engineering $ 102,704,905 $ 4,692,954 $ 13,044,614 $ (4,692,954) $ 115,749,519
Additional Capital Allocations Recoupmen 3,009,957 3.009.957
Retroactive CW A Debt Service (Exhibit C - -
Total $ 105,714,862 $ 4,692,954 $ 13,044,614 $ (4,692,954) $ 118,759,476 $ 13,079,163 $ 97,473,240 $ 5,197,116 $ 115,749,519
Capacity per Component 80,000,000 80,000,000 120,000.000 120,000,000
Cost per Gallon - Construction and Engine $ 1.2838 $ 0.0587 0.1087 (0.0391 )
Cost per Gallon - Recoupment $ 0.0376
Cost per Gallon - CW A Debt Service $ -
Cost per Gallon - Total $ 1.3214 $ 0.0587 $ 0.1087 $ (0.0391 \
EXHIBIT C1 (200 mgd )
SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PLANT
A
Diane%27s%20Summary_90%25%20ModifiecCNo%20UV _Rev3%20082906(1 ).xls
CALCULATION OF UNRECOVERED ORIGINAL CAPITAL COSTS
EXHIBIT C2 (200 mgd)
Raw Water Supply:
Pipeline CWA - 96" Pipeline
Pump Station, CWA
Treatment Plant (SEWPP):
Land Acquisition
Site Cleanup
Engineering:
Preliminary
Siting Study
Final Design - 160 mgd
Final Design - 80 mgd
Construction
Construction
138 KV Electric
Construct,on Mgt.
Audit Fees
Total Raw Water Supply and SEWPP
Raw Project Original Original Jun-OO Jun-OO Jun-OO New New
OriQinal Cost (a) Cost fa) Allocation %(a) Allocation $ (a) Allocation % Allocation $ Increased $ Allocation % Allocation $ Increased $
$ 14,367,830 $ 14,367,830 80/250 $ 4,597,706 126/250 $ 7,241,386 $ 2,643,681 210/250 $ 11,494,264 $ 4,252,878
21,261,056 7,492,883 225/225 7,492,883 225/225 7,492,883 225/225 7,492,883
$ 35,628,886 $ 21,860,713 $ 12,090,589 $ 14,734,269 $ 2,643,681 $ 18,987,147 $ 4,252,878
with new raw water contract $0.00
SEWPP Original Original Jun-oo Jun-oo Jun-oo New New Recoupment Balance of
Orig,nal Cost Cost (73%\ Allocation % Allocation $ Allocation % Allocation $ Increased $ Allocation % Allocation $ Increased S SEWPP
$ 6,675,192 $ 4,872,890 801750 $ 519,775 120/750 $ 779,662 $ 259,887 200/750 $ 1,299,437 $ 519,775 $ 3,573,453
1,149,372 0 0 0
606,238 442,554 801750 47,206 1201750 70,809 23,603 200/750 118,014 47,206 324,539
145,660 106,332 801750 11,342 1201750 17,013 5,671 200/750 28,355 11,342 77,977
6,285,146 4,588,157 801160 2,294,078 80/160 2,294,078 160/160 4,588,157 2,294,078
2,692,423 1,965,469 80180 1,965,469 80180 1,965,469 80/80 1,965,469
728,232 531,609 80180 531,609 80/80 531,609 - 80180 531,609
80,393,507 58,687,260 80/80 58,687,260 80180 58,687,260 80180 58,687,260
1,695,900 1,238,007 801750 132,054 1201720 206,335 74,280 200/720 343,891 137,556 894,116
6,102,064 4,454,507 80180 4,454,507 80/80 4,454,507 80/80 4,454,507
25,150 25,150 80180 25,150 80/80 25,150 80180 25,150
$ 106,498,884 $ 76,911,934 $ 68,668,450 $ 69,031,892 $ 363,442 $ 72,041,849 $ 3,009,957 $ 4,870,085
1$
142,127,770 I $
98,772,647 I
1$
80,759,039 I
3,007,1231
1$91,028,9961 $ 7,262,8351
1$
83,766,161 1 $
(a) Source: KPMG Audit of SEWPP Construction Costs as of November 30, 1995.
(b) The unrecovered costs after this expansion will be $4,870,085.
A
D.ane%27s%20Summary _90%25%20Modified_No%20UV _Rev3%20082906( 1 ).xls
9/12/2006
EXHIBIT C3 (200 mgd)
CWA BOND DEBT SERVICE. SERIES 1995 BONDS
CONSTRUCTION OF 96" RAW WATER LINE
RECOVERY OF PRIOR YEAR DEBT SERVICE
Fiscal CWA Bond Series SEWPP Allocation Allocation to 80 Allocation to 126 Additional 46 MGD Allocation to 210 Additional 84 MGD
Year 1995 Debt Service of Debt Service (1) MGD SEWPP (2) MGD SEWPP (3) Debt Service MGD SEWPP (3) Debt Service
1996 $ 2,608,990 $ 2,429,231 $ 809,744 $ 1,275,346 $ 465,602 $ 2,125,577 $ 850,231
1997 2,809,890 2,616,289 872,096 1,373,551 501,455 2,289,252 915,701
1998 2,806,223 2,612,874 870,958 1,371,758 500,800 2,286,264 914,506
1999 2,806,705 2,613,323 871,108 1,371,994 500,886 2,286,657 914,663
2000 2,806,465 2,613,100 871,033 1,371,876 500,843 2,286,461 914,585
2001 2,720,039 2,532,628 844,209 1,329,629 485,420 2,216,049 886,420
2002 2,723,914 2,536,236 845,412 1,331,523 486,111 2,219,206 887,683
2003 2,722,133 2,534,578 844,859 1,330,652 485,793 2,217,755 887,103
2004 2,724,695 2,536,964 845,654 1,331,905 486,251 2,219,842 887,937
2005 2,720,989 2,533,513 844,504 1,330,093 485,589 2,216,823 886,730
$ 25,558,736 $ 8,519,578 $ 4,898,749 $ 22,363,886 $ 8,945,559
with new raw water contract $0.00
1) Allocation of $45 million bond debt service to 96" raw water pipeline for SEWPP
based on the following:
96" line construction cost (est.)
Line "C" project cost (est.)
Issuance cost, discount, accrued interest
Cost (millions)
$ 40.3
3.0
1.7
45.0 $
$
Allocation of
Issuance Costs
$ 1.6 $
0.1
(1.7)
Costs After
Allocation
41.9
3.1
$
45.0
2) Allocation to 80 MGD SEWPP based on the following:
96" Line Capacity
Module Capacity
MOdule % of Allocation
240 MGD
80 MGD
33.33%
3) Allocation to 126 MGD and 240 MGD SEWPP based on the following:
96" Line Capacity
Module Capacity
Module % of Allocation
240 MGD
126 MGD
52.50%
240
210
87.50%
4) The balance of the unrecovered costs will be $3,194,849
through 2000 and varies annually thereafter.
EXHIBIT 01 (200 mgd) (With Distribution Purchased Capacity for Transmission Allocation)
SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL COSTS OF PUMPINGlDISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION COSTS BASED ON NO RESIDUAL VALUES
Land Acquisition
Site Cleanup
Engineering:
Preliminary
Siting Study
Final Design - 160 MGD
Final Design
Construction
Construction - 12" Hall Rd.
Construction - 10" Plumley
Construction - 36" Beamer - 10,000 If (Original Beamer Rd.)
Construction - 36" Beamer - 26,000 If (bid + City costs 8/12/02)
Construction - New Pumping
Less: Original Pumps'
Construction - 96" Point C to Point D
Audit Fees
Total
Capacity Purchased Existing Pipelines
Capacity Purchased New Beamer Rd. Pipeline
Cost per Gallon - Existing Pipeline (96" C to 0 and Beamer)
Cost per Gallon - New Beamer Rd. pipeline
Cost per Gallon - New Pump less Old Pump
Incremental Cost - Original Capacity
Purchase of Original Capacity (Dist. liB to C")
Purchase of Original Capacity
(See Exhibit D2 for Details)
· The original pump costs were estimated to have been $1,560,230
per the Kalluri Group report dated March 5. 2002.
55 mgd/200 mgd was allocated.
Estimated Project Costs
Distribution (Treated High Service Treated
Water Line)* Water PumoinQ Total
$ - $ - $ -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- -
- -
- -
2,752,075 2,752,075
9,796,047 - 9,796,047
2,712,212 2,712,212
(429,063) (429,063)
1,823,009 1,823,009
- - -
$ 14,371,131 $ 2,283.148 $ 16,654,279
32,000,000 55,000,000
32,000,000
$ 0.1430
$ 0.3061
$ 0.0415
$ - $ 0.0187
$ 0.0466
$ 0.1256
$ 0.4957 $ 0.1858
A
Diane%27s%20Summary _90%25%20Modified_No%20UV _Rev3%20082906(1 ).xls
9/12/2006
CAlCULA noN OF UNRECOVERED ORIGINAL CAPITAL COSTS
EXHIBIT D21200 mgd)
Distribution (Treated Water Plpellnel:
Preliminary Engineering
Final Design
Construcllon
Capacity Included in Costs
Distribution Cost per Gallon
High Service Treated Water Pumping
Land AcquIsition
Site Cleanup
Engineering:
Pre\iminll/)'
Siting Study
Final Design. 160 mgd
Final Design. 80 mgd
ConstrucliOn
Construction
136 KV EIecIric
Construcllon MgI.
Audit Fees
Capacity Included In Costs
Pumping Caet per Gallon
Raw Project Original Original Jun-OO Jun-OO Jun-OO N"", NN Balance of N"",
Allocation %la \ Dia1ribuIion Ie to
Onainal Cost (a) Cost /45%\ la\ Allocation SIal Allocation % Allocation $ B to C Increased $ Allocation % Allocation $ Increased $ 0\ Allocation %
32/250
$ 1,132,802 $ 509,761 2251225 $ 56,640 2501750 $ 169,920 $ 113,280 2501750 $ 169,920 $ . $ 26,583 2501750
1,679,060 645,566 2251875 261,662 2501250 645,566 563,724 2501250 645,566 132,267 2501250
23638,329 10,637248 2251875 3,545749 2501250 10637248 7 091 499 2501250 10637248 1664,138 2501250
$ 26650211 $ 11 992 595 $ 3664 251 $ 11652 754 $ 7 766 503 $ 11652754 $ . $ 1 823,009
250,000,000 32,000,000
$ 0.04660 $ " $ 0.0570
HS Pumping Original Original Jun-oo Jun-OO Jun-oo New New 200 rngd Costs Balance ot
Onainal Costla\ Cost 127%\ Allocation % Allocation $ Allocation % Allocation $ Increased $ Allocation % Allocation $ urchased CanAri1 Increased $ HS PS tOI
$ 6,675,192 $ 1,802,302 801750 $ 192,246 2001750 $ 480,614 $ 288,368 255/750 $ 612,783 $ 132,169 $ 1,189,519
1,149,372 0 0 0 0 0 0
606,238 163,684 801750 17,460 2001750 43,649 26.189 255/750 55,653 12.004 108,032
145,660 39.328 801750 4,195 2001750 10,488 6,293 255/750 13.372 2,664 25,957
6,285,146 1,696,889 801160 848.495 801160 848,495 1601160 1,696,989 848,495 848,495
2.692,423 726,954 80180 726.954 200I20O 726,954 - 2001200 726,954 726,954 -
728,232 196,623 80180 196,623 200I20O 196,623 - 2001200 196,623 196.623 -
60,393,507 21.706.247 80180 21,706.247 200I20O 21,706.247 . 2001200 21,706.247 21,706,247 -
1,695,900 457,893 801750 48,642 2001720 127,193 78.351 255/750 162,170 34,978 295,723
6,102,064 1,647,557 80180 1,647.557 2001200 1,647,557 - 2001200 1,647,557 1,647,557 - .
25150 - 60180 2001200 2001200 .
$ 106 498 664 $ 28 437 578 $ 25388618 $ 25787 819 $ 399 201 $ 26 818 348 $ 25,125876 $ 1 030 529 $ 1 619,230
200,000,000 200,000,000 55,000,000
$ 0.121e $ 0.12&1 $ 0.0117
Cost per gallon of Incremental wlo Final Design Costs
Original Cost HS Pumping Fully AlIoc. $
Lass: Cost of Original Pumps
$
0.0033
01289
$
25,125,878
(1,560,230)
23,565,646
200,000.000
$0 1178
$0.1858
(a) Source: KPMG Audit at SEVvPP Canstrucllon Costs as of November 30, 1995.
(0) The unrecovered high service pumping oasis after this expansion will be $1,619,230.
(e) The unrecovered 96" distribution costs after this expansion will be $12,604,758.
Original Firm HS Pumping Capacity
Original Firm HS Pumping Fully Alice. Costs/gal
0IiginaI Firm Filly Aloe Costs + Incremental + New p,
A
Diane's Summary-QQ'.. Modified_No UV_Rev3091506.x1s
1011112006
EXHIBIT F
CALCULATION OF TOTAL INVESTMENT BY PARTICIPANT
Original Investment Investment Total
Investment FY 2000 FY 2006 Investment Percent
Gulf Coast Water Authority $24,373,666 $3,346,676 $28,151.400 $55,871,742
Less: Capacity Sold (11,540,553) ( 11.540,553)
League City $12,833,113 $3,346,676 $28,151 ,400 $44,331,189 15.88%
Webster 3,369,608 860,012 1,117.206 5.346.826 1.91%
South Houston 2,848.968 853,507 261,000 3,963,475 1.42%
Pasadena 17,093,807 6,358,195 28,451,365 51,903,367
Plus: Capacity Bought 0 850,000 850,000
Pasadena 17,093,807 7,208,195 28,451,365 52.753,367 18.89%
Harris Co. MUD #55 1,153,386 875,180 851.766 2,880,332
Plus: Capacity Bought 2.318,695 2,318,695
Less: Ownership Sold 0 ( 1,168,800) (1,168,800)
Harris Co. MUD #55 3,472,081 (293,620) 851,766 4.030,227 1.44%
LaPorte Area W A 4,831,404 1,141,744 542,880 6,516,028
Plus: Capacity Bought 3,425,120 3,425.120
Less: Capacity Sold 0 (2,550,000) (2,550,000)
laPorte Area W A 8,256.524 ( 1 ,408,256) 542,880 7,391,148 2.65%
Friendswood 3,418,761 2,021 ,459 10.150,076 15,590,296
Plus: Capacity Bought 0 1,434,400 1 ,434,400
Friel 3,418.761 3,455,859 10,150,076 17,024,696 6.10%
Clear Lake City W A 12,046,367 6,916,939 1,670,400 20,633,706
Plus: Capacity Bought 5,796,738 1.434,400 7,231,138
Clear Lake City W A 17,843,105 8,351,339 1.670,400 27,864,844 9.98%
Baybrook MUD #1 1,650,470 324,272 125,280 2,100,022 0.75%
Clear Brook City MUD 1,375.392 452,073 2,034,407 3.861,872 1.38%
Co-Participant Totals $72,161,829 $23,150,057 $73,355,n9 $168,667,665
City of Houston 67,040,991 3.973,245 62,461,043 133,475.279
Less: Recoupment Costs 0 (4,214,809) (1,447,600) (5,662,409)
Less: Capacity Sold 0 (7,965,697) (9,294,422) (17,260,119)
City of Houston 67.040.991 (8.207,261 ) 51,719,021 110,552.751 39.59%
TOTAL NET $139.202,820 14,942,796 $125,074,800 $279,220,416 100.00%
TOTAL COSTS $139,202,820 27,123,302 135,816,822
A
E)(hibits - 200 mgd_Cl20907 xiS
6/20/2007
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT F (continued)
CALCULATION OF TOTAL GALLONS BY PARTICIPANT
Distribution Allocation
Demand Pumping Existing New
Allocation Allocation 96" B to C 96. C to D Beamer Beamer
Gulf Coast Water Authority
Original 16.5000 16.5000 18.1675
Capacity Sold
Incremental Purchase 15.0000 15.0000 15.0000 15.0000 5.0000 5.0000
Subtotal 31.5000 31.5000 33.1675 15.0000 5.0000 5.0000
Webster
Original 4.0500 5.8310 5.8310
Incremental Purchase 1.8600 1.8600 1.8600
Subtotal 4.0500 5.8310 5.8310 1.8600 1.8600 1.8600
South Houston
Original 3.7500 3.7500 3.7500
Incremental Purchase
Subtotal 3.7500 3.7500 3.7500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Pasadena
Original 23.5000 31.0000 16.6675
Incremental Purchase 16.5000 21.7660
Subtotal 40.0000 52.7660 16.6675 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Harris Co. MUD #55
Original 3.4625 4.2520 4.2520
Incremental Purchase 1.3600 1.3600 1.3600
Subtotal 3.4625 4.2520 4.2520 1.3600 1.3600 1.3600
laPorte Area Water Authority
Original 7.8000 9.7500 0.0000
Incremental Purchase
Subtotal 7.8000 9.7500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Friendswood
Original 6.0000 8.5200 8.5200
Incremental Purchase 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000 9.6800 9.6800 9.6800
Subtotal 12.0000 14.5200 14.5200 9.6800 9.6800 9.6800
A
Exhibits. 200 mgd_020907ds
6/20/2007
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT F (continued)
CALCULATION OF TOTAL GALLONS BY PARTICIPANT
Distribution Allocation
Demand Pumping Existing New
Allocation Allocation 96" B to C 96"CtoD Beamer Beamer
Clear Lake City Water Authority
Original 24.0000 36.5100 36.5100
Incremental Purchase 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Subtotal 24.0000 36.5100 36.5100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Baybrook MUD #1
Original 1.8000 3.3750 3.3750
Incremental Purchase 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Subtotal 1.8000 3.3750 3.3750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Clear Brook City MUD
Original 1.5000 3.8455 3.8455
Incremental Purchase 1.0000 0.0000 3.8455 3.8455 0.0000
Subtotal 2.5000 3.8455 3.8455 3.8455 3.8455 0.0000
TOTAL (prior to City) 130.8625 166.0995 121.9185 31.7455 21.7455 17.9000
City of Houston
Original 27.6375 76.6665 149.0815 250.0000 32.0000 32.0000
Capacity Sold 0.0000 (21.0000) (31.7455) (21.7455) (17.9000)
Incremental Purchase 41.5000 12.2340
Subtotal 69.1375 88.9005 128.0815 218.2545 10.2545 14.1000
TOTAL 200.0000 255.0000 250.0000 250.0000 32.0000 32.0000
A
Exhibits. 200 mgd_020907 xis
6/20/2007
Page 3 of 3
Beamer Rd. and Related Transmission Allocation to Benefiting Participants
Incremental Total Total
Existing Distribution Purchased Total Purchased Distribution Distribution
Participant (Contract Purchase) Distribution Capacity Distribution Capacity wi Capacity wi
MGD Capacity (MGD) Only 36" (MGD) Only 42" (MGD)
(MGD) (Beamer Rd.) (42")
Friendswood 8.5200 6.0000 14.5200 9.6800 4.8400
GCWA 18.1675 5.0000 23.1675 5.0000 18.1675
Webster 5.8310 0.0000 5.8310 1.8600 3.9710
Harris Co MUD 4.2520 0.0000 4.2520 1.3600 2.8920
Clear lake City (25% of 9.1200 0.0000 9.1200 0.0000 9.1200
T otan
Baybrook MUD 3.3750 0.0000 3.3750 0.0000 3.3750
Clear Brook MUD 3.8455 0.0000 3.8455 0.0000 0.0000
City of Houston 10.0000 0.0000 10.0000 14.1000 1.1583
Totals 63.1110 11.0000 74.1110 32.0000 43.5238
Totals without Clear Brook or City of Houston 17.9000
Clear Brook MUD for Existing 96" and 36" 3.8455
City of Houston for Existing 96" and 36" 10.2545
Total with City of Houston and Clear Brook for Existing 96" and 36" 32.0000
43.5238
32.0000
EXHIBIT I
CITY OF HOUSTON UNTREATED WATER FACILITIES' OUTSTANDING DEBT FACILITY
COMPONENT
1 Coastal Water Authority (General)
2 Trinity River Authority (General)
Pnncipal @ 71112005
$198,625,000
6,000,000
$204,625,000
Less: '87f91 Issue 96" Initial Capital Payment
$14,734,269 of $120,000,000 Principal Total (12.28%) times
Outstanding Principal @ 7/1/2005 of $86,700,000
(10,646,760)
$193.978,240
3 Coastal Water Authority (TRAlLynchburg PS
Upgrade) (General)
4 TRA - Current Lake Livingston Improvements
5 Aliens Creek Land Purchase
6 Lake Houston Dam/Reservoir Improvements
7 Wallisville Lake Project
8 Dayton Canal
Total Outstanding Debt:
40,385,000
17,996.000
14,000,000
17,016,400
10,077,550
5,150,000
$298,603.190
ESTIMATED COST OF RAW WATER FOR EXPANSION TO 200 MGD
Raw Water Costs (Formula for Exhibit C)
GCWAI League
Clear Brook Friendswood Pasadena GCWAlPeartand City
(AiD2 x C) (AiD2 X C) (AiD2 X C) (AiD2 X C) (AiD2 X C)
1.00 6 16.5 10 5
518.65 518.65 518.65 518.65 518.65
(A2) Additional Demand Capacity (mgd)
(02) Defined Year Average Day Production (mgd)
(Fiscal Year 2004 data)
(C) Houston's Untreated Water Outstanding Debt
(for period ending 7/1/05)
$298,603,190 $298,603,190 $298.603,190 $298,603,190 $298,603,190
Additional Raw Water Capacity Cost
Formula equals (A1B) x C =
Total Estimated Raw Water Demand Capacity Cost
$576,304
$3,454,839
$9,498,567
$5,757,070
$2,878,535 $22,165,315
A
S IpwesharelPLANSECTlWater Supply and Cost Shanng ConlractslTrealed Waler Supply ConlractslSoutheast PlanlYales~QWanslon contract 091506lfor prinlinglExhiblls - 200 mgd_020907 062007 xis
Page 1
Exhibit J - Transmission Line Capacity Distribution Ma~
200-mgd Capacity Distribution with Beamer Road Line
. Total Capacity of 42" & 36" lines = 75.52 mgd
. Exist & Expansion Purchased Capacity = 75.52 mgd (as of October 7, 2005)
South Houston
Clear Lake City
Water Authority
(16 & 24'}
Gulf Coast PointQ
Water Authority
(10.00 mgd)
Clearbrook
(Hall & Sage Canyon)
(1.92/0 mgd)
Clear Lake City
Water Authority
(0/9.12 mgd)
LEGEND
.. (, "I: Balance of Purchase
",-- ---f/> Line Capacity (mgd)
Gulf Coast
Water Authority
(5.00/0 mgd)
Baybrook
Water Plant \6' & m
(0/3.38 mgd)
Webster
(Magnolia)
(0.93/1.98 mgd)
Gulf Coast Water
Authority
(0/16.50 mgd)
. Take Point
(1.5 mgd) Purchased Capacity
;:\B13B\43343-ADDEND\CO-PART DEUVERY POINT5\FINAL 2006\MAPF.dwg, 9/11/2006 5:38:51 PM, hollandjr
MAPF.DWG
~
C;;
8
~~
zS!r"'I
~r;tX
:::f!;d=
i~~
~:i!-
z~
-f~
1
-
/
/
/
/
/
N .
o
CII(/)
o
Q
I g~
!e:
, ~C)
rfl,
x-
.~
-r>.
~
-0 l'l .
t
i
i
N
~
~
~
~
Ul
@
o
~
""
~
o
z
Ul
o
o
<:
,:.,
~
,.,
,.,
$.
co
,.,
...
~
t-
W
.....l
?;
.0
et:.
r
\.d
~
~
o
W
-1
:L
KINGSPOINT
t
..
~
~
....
IC
..,
~.
In
l
...
...
Q>
z
o
If)
~l\
:L
~\
o
~
t..J
~
I
~
:::E
EXHIBIT I
GUlf COAST WA'JER AUTHORiTY (GCWA)
FUQUA RO 0 BEAMER RD
CONNECllON paNT
t
t
!
~
~
;;.
\
...
...
0\
t
.1fI
~
~
~
~
t
G;
\
\
i
0-
S \
t)
m
~
. \
Q ~
..,
~ ~
~
\
scale:
& '&0 ~
~f-)
EXt01l1 '
Ql\f cotSt tjt.1E1\ ~1't (GC'fl~
llt.'l foIV. Bl.~ O~ ~.
CONNEC1\oN pCJttl
EXHIBIT II
ESnMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
GCWA - PEAHLAND
MGO Coet Gal. Char
EXisting Capacity 0.0000 $0.0696
AdOed CapaCity Needed 10.0000 $1.3801
Total SEWPP 2005 CClpaCity 10.0000
PUmping
ExiSting Capacity 0.0000 $0
Incremental CapaCity 10.0000 $0.1858 1.858.000
T Oldl Pumping 10.0000 $1.858.000
Dtatribution
EXISting CapaCity 0.0000
96" line . POUlt C to POlOt 0 0.0000
and EXisting 36- Beamer 0.0000 $0.1430
NtiW 36M Beamer Line 0.0000 $0.3061
IncrenlBntal~cdy
96. LIne . POInt C to Point 0 10.0000 $0.0570
New 36- Beamer line 0.0000 $0.3061
96M Line POlOt 8 to Point C 10.0000 $0.0466
Total DlStnbutlOn 10.0000
A
Dianes Summary_OO ModifiecCNo UV_Rev_030807 _dol061207cor.xls 6I12J2007
Page 1 of 1
MAPC3.DWG
I
I
I
I
I
~~ \
I
~~ I
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
-Cj I
I
;
G-
I~~~
~~ %
~ i~ 0
aia- "'(1) BAYWOOD
:z: =< f.~
-f oeD
.. J:I~
I i: gllll
..... ~I~
I>
I
~:\I.I136\'13313-ADDEN[)\CO_"ART DEUVERY POINTS\FINAl2006\MAPC3.dwg, 9/11/2006 5:28:47 PM, hollandJr
.--.....-. . "'-""--"~ ,~..- ._,..~_". ..w__..__"_'_..._..,.._~..___,_......___.__~~__...._.....__.~ _.-...,____~.___..__._.___._.__~..___
N .
PANe
'1
)>
;:u
s:
o
Z
-l
NATIONS
'1l'11C)O
:;o0l'11)>>
)>-<2:2:
z"s;::)>
(1-1)>0
l'11 :;0)>-
^
EXHIBIT II
ESTIMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
GCWA . LEAGUE CITY
MGD coet Gal. ebete
SEWPP
EXISting CapacIty 16.5000 $0.0696
AdOed Capacity Needed 5.0000 $1.3801
T Oldl SEWPP 2005 CapacJty 21.5000
Pumping
ExtStlng Capacity 16.5000
Incremental Capactty 5.0000 $0.1858
T otaJ Pumping 21.5000
Oi.trtbutJon
EXIsting Capacity 16.5000
96" Line" Point C to POInt 0
and Existing 36- Beamer 0.0000 $0.1430
New 36- BeaI1l8( Ltne 0.0000 $0.3061
Incremental CapacJty
96 ~ Line . POint C to POint 0
and ExIsting 36- Beamer 5.0000 $0.1430 715.000
New 36- Beamer Line 5.0000 $0.3061 1,530,500
96 ~ Line POUlt 6 to POIOt C 5.0000 $0.0466 233.000
T Olal Dlstnbutlon 21.500 $2,478.500
T olJIt Coat. $11.451.400
A
Dianes Summary _90 Modified_No UV _Rev_030807 _doI061207cor.x1s 611212007
Page 1 of 1
\Nt..
p
\
i
8
~
on
~
';:t
~
~
~
\
i
M
a
~
~
~
\
~
l:\-
S
~
3
~
$
..,
'"
-:-
.:::;
,. ~...y
,,(f.
,!'-
, '?"?
~
'l.-
sco\e:
r. '\o.-J!>
(t4U"dlW6 f.,.t)
"
"
"
"
"
E~1.1111
C\.f.I'R t.H<E art
...~1ER pt>>l1 No.3
CONNEC1\oN ~NT
~
~
t"">
~
2-
~
EXHIBIT II
ESTIMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
CLEAR BROOK CITY MUD
MGD Cost per Gal. Char e1Rebate
SEWPP
Existing Capacity 1.5000 $0.0696
Added Capacity Needed 1.0000 $1.3801
Total SEWPP Costs 2.5000
Pumping
Existing Capacity 3.8455
Incremental Capacity 0.0000 $0.1858
Total Pumping 3.8455
Distribution
Existing Capacity 3.8455
96" Line - Point C to Point D
and Existing 36" Beamer 3.8455 $0.1430 549,907
New 36" Beamer Line 0.0000 $0.3061
Incremental Capacity
96" Line - Point C to Point D 0.0000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer Line 0.0000 $0.3061
96" Line Point B to Point C 0.0000 $0.0466
Total Distribution 3.8455 $549,907
Total Costs $2,034,407
A
Diane%27s%20Summarv_ 90%25%20Modified No%20UV Rev3%20082906(1 txls
0/1 ')/')nnc:
t
:g
i
~
~
.n
i
~
0-
a.
~
...
i
i
N
i
~
tn
~
~
~
~
S
~
6
~
~
~
~
-<::
i. " I'
v
z
~ fAtRMONl
~
%
,/
./
J //
jl
f.fl
Z
o
i=
<{
Z
CANADA
DENMARK
EGYPT
FRANCE
PASADENA
- ----
<<. GENOA _ R~ BcurJ - .. '"''''''''
----
15' COASTAL',
STAlES EASEMENT'
1 .
80 H.c.r.C.o.
EA
C.W.A. .
EASEMENT
. .
1151 H.C.F.C~D.
EASEMENT
..
'6'
c
t
i
8
l':i
Iii
...
~
....
'"
CONNECllON. .~..
c;;SE'M'P~
~
i
!$
..J
0(.
Z
~
~
~
Cl
~
0..
~
Cl
~
-f
...
.,.
...
i
...
.....
!!l-
DJJNGTON
AElD
Scale:
? II 10 15
(1Iundr'ed Feet)
~
o
.N
o
~
::E
EXHIBIT I
alY OF LAPORTE
CONNECllON paNT
A
Diane%27s%20Summary_90%25%20Modified_No%20UV _Rev3%20082906(1 }.xls
9/12/2006
EXHIBIT II
ESTIMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
BA YBROOK MUD #1
MGD Cost per Gal. Char e1Rebate
SEWPP
Existing Capacity
Added Capacity Needed
1.8000
0.0000
$0.0696
$1.3801
Total SEWPP 2005 Capacity 1.8000
Pumping
Existing Capacity 3.375
Incremental Capacity 0.000 $0.1858
Total Pumping 3.375
Distribution
Existing Capacity 3.375
96" Line - Point C to Point D
and Existing 36" Beamer 0.000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer Line 0.000 $0.3061
Incremental Capacity
96" Line - Point C to Point D 0.000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer Line 0.000 $0.3061
96" Line Point B to Point C 0.000 $0.0466
Total Distribution 3.375 $
Total Costs $
A
Diane%27s%20Summary _90%25%20Modified_No%20UV _Rev3%20082906( 1 ).xls 9/12/2006
J
r
~
ci:i
N
Vi
~
0;-
t
i
8
N
~
~
2
>-
co:
~
w
o
i
~
o
!
..,
ii;
i
~
....
s
Vi
-1
-- ~,=--d-~~~::~-,;:~:'~==:J=r, -~-~---~:-=~.:--'f-~--'- " ,__ (,I, -
i 1 /' ! Ii I 1.!:lr,f
I : I /' i I, ' -
I)' j / / If, . r.--<5~/ : I~~'I :1
I , -I :---------l Ii ~I -J .' ,~I~;
I ,I r~-~~-=j IF~L I ~> ~ ~
///, \-ri-.- 'I I( ,1 (-~~ ", :~f,ft
I '/ Ie: Ji Ii.... ~ I~"I; ,', ..
/ /j::l-~-I':'\ 'H \,
I / i'l - I ,<; I ,.I %-[---' _" l-
I ':, " :1 :21.;)-,," \ ""'I ~:=I:: _
/ / '~"'I U~~~
,".,) -'.r -:7'
'~~ Q
f
,
~
/ /.//
-1"//
/I/,
1/" -'
//
////
//
j
<::.
-~
i
Q
~
:a
~T~
'1/
C;-SEVl'P~
ELlINGTON
REID
o
Scale:
5 10 t5
(HuftchcI Feet)
EXHIBIT I
Q.EAR LAkE aTY
EAST CF SEW'P
CONNECnON POINT
- -----t----
i
--l\
"~i:;;Ff~)r, -~
L.:r4-
"". I I :
;',.',", j,
'r::::;,~_>/__ _~~
\ 1
c~
()
{-
----'
~
>-
<:
Q!
>
<(
cr.:
PA'.:JDCt'J;\
HCU~_:TChf
/
/
.... '/"f
/ ~~)';<;>) ~<</
/ '. / "'(..
./ ..
..../ '
, ./ '<(
,~~/ <^
~ / 'Z/ /
'~~, (/ ""~..-i',./" /
,"~ '. >^"
. / ."
./ ~
,~~ "", /'("-.."
''''~~ 'I"j , . , "
,~,," ' ~. "' '"
" '.~,,' '
,~, /1lf~ ~
~\~~ ~. /:f1 "" /
,,\~ '- ~I ".
!'~~~ i'/) ",
~""
//' ,'~",,,
-:fJ(/'/ '''';:~\'. L
/j ,~ '
/ ,~~
" "
" ~
~
^'
/ ,
/ 'V
<-.
"
~~ '>
/'v ,/
,,"-. > v
"-,, /
~ >. /
\ v
..~ '
/;
./
~1
f
I
\, I
~ ' .' J"
7',> , "'<..:-- X /
/':,:, //
I ~ '<" , :::'~/'>"k'
'-". , .-- '><:..
I "'-' ... .,,/ ~/ \.
I ,,% /' /' .
',- "- '11</ / \
I %', '. /.it / '---~.... \
III \ '-<,)I{/CQNNE\I\lVI' 0 \"" ///
"/.' #'~" + //'---./'~
,,' ~ \
--.1 ...... "if' "-'"" \ / \
1 /'< , ,,/
,ff ", ,"" ~ ""
t/F "" .........
f "'~"'" ~
I' y....../ "?'
/,. d- "
'if '''-
1;( ~
If' ~
"
~ ~~_.
c", ,.
.\:0.
\
i
'8
~
.n
i
...
...
~
t
\
~
t
rri
~
~
\
i
...
~
~
~
,:.,
~
~
'"
...
~
Iii
'" ,,<>" , ~
'''':::j/ '"
~~
~
" >
~~<'/
"
..~/
, ,
~...
,,~
"-
"
" ,
/~
Scale: ~
a ,0
(~ ,.-t)
/
/,/'
/ ,
/ "'-
// "-..
//
EXt'111l 1
QIHllH<E aTe
~~lMo.3
1I~C1\()l paMl
-
~
,,;
~
:s
A
Diane%27s%20Summary_90%25%20Modified_No%20UV _Rev3%20082906(1 ).xls
9/12/2006
EXHIBIT II
ESTIMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
CLEAR LAKE CITY WATER AUTHORITY JOHNSON SPACE CENTER
MGD Cost per Gal. Charge/Rebate
SEWPP
Existing Capacity 1.6000 $0.0696
Added Capacity Needed 0.0000 $1.3801
Total SEWPP 2005 Capacity 1.6000
Pumping
Existing Capacity 2.560
Incremental Capacity 0.000 $0.1858
Total Pumping 2.560
Distribution
Existing Capacity 2.560
96" Line - Point C to Point D
and Existing 36" Beamer 0.000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer Line 0.000 $0.3061
Incremental Capacity
96" Line - Point C to Point D
and Existing 36" Beamer 0.000 $0.14300
New 36" Beamer Line 0.000 $0.30610
96" Line Point B to Point C 0.000 $0.04660
Total Distribution 0.000
A
Diane's SummarL90% Modified_No UV_Rev3 082906.xls
9/15/2006
~
A
Diane's Summary_90% Modified_No UV_Rev3 082906.xls
9/15/2006
......
\
i
'"
...
1,
;,.;
l
;:.
...
(;\
t
\Ii
\
,
a
\
R
\
'i.
8
f:i
ffi
15
"f
....
~
~
(
L-
Sco\e:
, ,0 ~
OU"~ f-)
L
0\\11111
a11 f:E fRlOlDs1OOO
CONMEC1\oN ~'"
~
~
~
S:\8138\43343-AODEND\CD-PART DEUVERY POINTS\ANAl2006\MAPE-GEX.dwg, 9/11/2006 5:34:08 PM, hoIlandjr
"APE -GEX.DY<<;
~~
~~~
~il;
i52~
11-
''''~
",
"
"
'-.
'.
"
A
Diane%27s%20Summary _90%25%20Modified_No%20UV _Aev3%20082906(1 ).xls
Q/1 ?/f)nnc:
\Nt..
t'
t
.~
i
~
~
.:n
i
~
C\
!
~
\
\
i
....
i-
re
\
\
'i
"r
~
~
~
2
~
a
~tlEC1l(1t -p:
~lUM1
sco,.e:
o ' 10 ~
- -
(~ v.-t)
OT1~~
pUllAIEf ~ 1l~1iR ~
~ ~(l.It. ~"If)UJt ~~~ fU.Il1
EXHIBIT II
ESTIMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
SOUTH HOUSTON
MGD Cost per Gal.
SEWPP
Existing Capacity 3.7500 $0.0696
Added Capacity Needed 0.0000 $1.3801
Total SEWPP 2005 Capacity 3.7500
Pumping
Existing Capacity 3.75000
Incremental Capacity 0.00000 $0.1858
Total Pumping 3.75000
Distribution
Existing Capacity
96" Line - Point C to Point D
and Existing 36" Beamer 0.0000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer Line 0.0000 $0.3061
Incremental Capacity
96" Line - Point C to Point D
and Existing 36" Beamer 0.0000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer Line 0.0000 $0.3061
96" Line Point B to Point C 0.0000 $0.0466
Total Distribution 0.000
Total Costs $261,000
Alternatively, the City of South Houston can make payment by paying $0.1011000
gallons until a total of 3.05 billion gallons have been purchased. (At 1.5 MGD, the
COH will be repaid in approximately 5.5 years.)
A
Dianes Summary_90 Modified_No UV _Rev__030807 _dol061207cor062107.xls
7/11/2007
~i A\( . 80\"H-\\E-
l' \)"-1' ~' >-...J - ~
~/ J:O~ g \i ~ .-1 lW
/J V ...J:..J lQ ~_~ p or~".~
<0 u.1 9 S -- \ /'
? /^ - ,/
\\? CC~~.
. \'" 51 (I-\d'R \-\ NY
~
<:
r-
oJ f>.. Vt. 0
~~~EC]1,* -~-
-~ por\
r-
AVE f
~
~ ;E is F ~ p,yt. G
t"'') '..t U1 ~ J~. - ,..
>> cc: iNME<:noN"ri' - c<l1lEC' OIl 'II" ,V,- k
/('-i? ,,he sty
S'~ p,yt. \ n-
'" f>.. VE. J
/O~ AVE. \< ~ ~
, ~-0
,:'11-' "" ~ \fE. L
"-, AVE M
~ A'VE. N
'<;
"
-I:'-
J:
l-'
'-"
.-
s \'":
~
/:--\ ~
~ \;('-
~~' O~
(<;3
~
r:-
-------'
---~----
,
'1(
,~
' _ S>-
, /'a
?Iv'
\
R
\
t
10
~
i
IS
B
lI\
g
S
....
Q\
t
t
\D
~
;;i
,
R
~
0
~
""
~
0
ffi ~
~
~ t
~ ~
<0
....
~
freeW(Y~ ELION
tJ\Unorl ROPER
por~ Su\\ p\-lUR
r i...... --,' I )-
I~ REGAL W
:!- _ CC [0::-
- 0 SHf>.. \~l:-[.. \..I-
\~ ~
l~
" 'ST\ "K E 0:.;
t..?\ . _,I"'
ARV p,NA i~
w
GILP\N :;;~
o Al8"'()
o
...J
...J
LJ
'Z
\.1.1
~
v--
~
~
1/
-"
,...-
oS
I
JAAN
lRElL
- '~I
Z " ,
I'dJ \1 :J ...J
\\ 1,1 ...J
Z ~\ '!-, --'6)
-\() i\~ 't:::. Ct:
0:, III ~\ ..:(
<''''' ii,
--------------
\~
f
EXHIBIT 1
cnY OF SOUlli HOOSlQN
7th S1REET
COHNECllONPON1S
EXHIBIT II
ESTIMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
PASADENA
MGD Cost per Gallon Char elRebate
SEWPP
Existing Capacity 23.5000 $0.0696 $1,635,600
Added Capacity Needed 16.5000 $1.3801 22,771,650
Total SEWPP Costs 40.0000 $24,407,250
Pumping
Existing Capacity 31.00000 $0
Incremental Capacity 21.76596 $0.1858 4,044,115
Total Pumping 52.76596 $4,044,115
Distribution
Existing Capacity 16.66750
96" Line - Point C to Point D
and Existing 36" Beamer 0.0000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer Line 0.0000 $0.3061
Incremental Capacity
96" line - Point C to Point 0 0.0000 $0.1430
New 36" Beamer line 0.0000 $0.3061
96" Line Point B to Point C 0.0000 $0.0466
Total Distribution 16.6675
$28,451,365
A
Diane%27s%20Summary _90%25%20Modified_No%20UV Rev3%20082906l1 ).xls
nJ~ nJn___
...
'6'
fa
=0
.s::.
i
U'l
0
~
.n
~
....
~
'"
t
0-
..
i
;;,
...
~
~
~
~
~
~
0
~
.s:
a.
~ .~
0
z
w 0
0
~ ~
.... ~
;l;
'"
::!:- %
ClO
'"
....
~
~
00l0" - flEj) \lUlff
Ci~.VIF/)
<>
ELLINGTON
p.IRPO~l'
Scale:
o 10 20 30
(Hunnd F.-t)
EXHIBIT 1
all OF pASADENA
CONNECll~ P<JNlS
................"--"".....~~-~-~ -.----
A
Diane%27s%20Summary _90%25%20Modified_No%20UV__Rev3%20082906(1 ).xls
9/12/2006
...
~
.!!!
'0
.c
:i
a.
"
0
.:;
....
Ii;
ID
0
0
t::!.
-'
-'
0;-
~
..,
li1
~
S
0
N
::t
z
Ii:
-
~
~
~
~
C
l-
i
~
z i
w
g 0
1= fj
~
~ .~
:::IE
lXl
~
~
Ii;
,
, "
, "-'
, ,',
, , '
, , "
, "-
"- ,
,
'-s: '>
"0.:/ /
,;s';"
~'" {:. /
, v~/
, ~/
, c)'/
, /
v
. p AR~<E~ - R:;
--. --
- - ,----
\
\
....\t:
Si. ~
::Ii';)
)
/
/
/
~/
0/-0
/a
<
)
/
/
/
o
Scale:
II 10
15
(HundrwcI Feet)
EXHIBIT I
HARRIS COUNTY ".U.O. No. 55
CONNECllON POINT
EXHIBIT II
ESTIMATED COSTS PER CO-PARTICIPANT
FRIENDSWOOD
MGD Cost per Gal. Charge/Rebate
SEWPP
Existing Capacity
Added Capacity Needed
Existing Capacity - Costs
Total SEWPP Exp Capacity
Total SEWPP Costs
Pumping
Existing Capacity
Incremental Capacity
Total Pumping
6.0000
6.0000
$0.0696
$1.3801
12.0000
$8,698,200
8.52000
6.00000
14.52000
$0.1858
$0
1,114,800
$1,114,800
Distribution - Alternative #2
Existing Capacity
96" Line - Point C to Point D
Existing 36" Beamer
New 36" Beamer Line
Incremental Capacity
96" Line - Point C to Point D
New 36" Beamer Line
96" Line Point B to Point C
Total Distribution
8.52000
0.68000 $0.0570
0.68000 $0.0860
0.68000 $0.3061
0.00000 $0.0860
0.00000 $0.3061
0.68000 $0.0466
14.52000
A
Diane%27s%20Summary _90%25%20Modified_No%20UV _Rev3%200aw~'pils
PHOA 1 nf 1
~
ID
P
t
!;!
o
...
Ui
~
....
C>
t
~
~
~
::E:
i
N
:;i
Z
~
~
!
o
~
it
~
o
~
~
p,
..,.
...
M
~
M
....
~
Ui
t
i
--
- -
Scole:
o 5 10 115
(HuncIr.d FNt)
PA~W.2-0~- 2~=--
- -- r- ----
\
EXHIBI
BAYBROOK Y.U.D. No.1: BAYBROOK SQUARE.
lHE LODGE APlS., SA YBROOK \1UAGE DR
WATER PLANT, McDONALDS. QRCUlT an, AND