Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
La Porte Comprehensive Plan 2004
,r F a l 4 - fi DOOR ENS01 hTS THE FUTURE —people can either wait until the future happens and react to whatever it brings, or they can c open the door and meet the future with a plan pre- to help it become the future they want it to be. pared The people of La Porte have decided to meet their future with a plan — A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — to e help guide La Porte in achieving specific, predeter- mined development goals. These goals are based on an 0 ' analysis and evaluation of: LA PORTE'S DESIRES LA PORTE'S OPPORTUNITIES LA PORTE'S FINANCES . Thus, this comprehensive plan can be divided into three sections MASTER PLAN -` RKET OPPORTUNITIES IMPLEMENTATION The preparation of the comprehensive plan itself repre- sents a six-month effort that has included the active participation of: - MAYOR AND COUNCIL virginia cone, Mayor LA PORTE'S LEADERS Norman L. Malone. LA PORTE'S CITY STAFF District 1 JohnD. 2 Longley, District LA PORTE'S CITIZENS Di Edward M. Matuszak, ' - District a Theplanis the creation of CA PORTE'S MAYOR AND Deotis Gay, District a CITY COUNCIL who had the foresight-torecognize the " B. Don Skelton, need and see that the need was; fulfilled. District 5 - - Linda westergren. The plan has been guided by the STEERING COM- D str ct 6 Kevin Graves, MITTEE that has participated in each step of the At Large plan's progress, providing insight and guidance - Lindsay Pfeiffer, At Large throughout. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - The plan is the result of the effort and capability of STEERING COMMITTEE THE CITY STAFF who have worked hard to assure its. - realistic results. John R. Lloyd, Chairman - - - Edward M. Matuszak _ The plan is in response to the advice and judgment of -. B. Don Skelton - indsay Pfeiffer the hundreds of LA PORTE CITIZENS whohavetaken Doug Latimer time and effort to respond to surveys and attend meet Janet S. Graves - - Charlie Yong ings, giving voice to their needs and desires. Because of those who have participated, giving their CITY MANAGER time and effort unselfishly, LaPorte is ready for the. Jack Owen future. 1. I 1 r� Tf THE ,i LA PORTE STANDS POISED UPON AN ERA OF UNPRECEDENTED GROWTH. As its surrounding com- munities have matured, their growth has begun to decline, and it is now La Porte's time to grow. As a nat- ural extension of the Pasadena/Deer Park growth, the next twenty years will see La Porte go from a town of 25,000 persons to a city of over 75,000 persons. The City wfll have almost 100,000 persons when fully devel- oped around the year 2020. There is no question that La Porte will grow in the future, the question is HOW should La Porte grow in order to offer the highest qual- ity of life for its citizens. This MASTER PLAN illustrates what La Porte wants to achieve with its growth. An extensive survey of La Porte citizens, coupled with comments received at sev- eral public meetings, has been interpreted in a series of master planning goals: ENHANCE LA PORTE'S ATTRACTION AS A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. PRESERVE THE INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER OE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. EMPHASIZE BEAUTIFICATION OF THE CITY. %(WOO, E:.. F U R .,jT.'.U.. _ .. • .. 'LlnYep. .. -[`may:-.;..-...1���- :1.M1���. �^.`L.,,. , �. -•� .: R PLAN 47 MAXIMIZE THE POTENTIAL O. NEW RETAIL MANAGE GROWTH OF INDUSTRY WITHIN THE CITY. ENCOURAGE THE UNIFICATION OF LA PORTE, PROVIDE MORE PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES. La Porte's master plan responds to these goals. The master plan is designed to reflect the land use, residen- tial development, utilities, thoroughfares, community facilities, beautification, and open space required in La Porte if its goals are to be achieved. In addition to illustrating what La Porte WANTS. TO ACHIEVE, this master plan reflects what La Porte CAN ACHIEVE. Limitations resulting from existing develop- ment, environmental conditions, topography, ownership patterns, and political jurisdictions are recognized. The reality imposed by La Porte's market opportunities and economic constraints are considered. The result is a master plan for development that CAN BE ACHIEVED. La Porte recognizes the opportunity is here to make this master plan a reflection of its future. La Porte is now ready to open the door to that future. ire opportunities for the City of la Porte it is necessary: to understand the assets the City possesses .La Porte's most significant assets are: -: _,.., LOCATION - La Porte's greatest asset is its location on Galveston Bay. La Porte is the closest point of access from Houston to the bay. The future will see continued growth in demand.forrecreational activ- ity and, La Porte is well located to capitalize on this opportunity. BARBOURS CUT - The presence of the Container Port at Barbours Cut offers unique market oppor- tunities`for La Porte. The continued growth of con- tainerized operations, coupled with the fact that this will be the container port serving most of Texas for the foreseeable future, suggests that this facility will experience significant growth. LA PORTE. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -The excellence of the La Porte School System will be a major factor in stimulating additional residential growth in La Porte. Its excellent schools give La Porte an effective advantage in attracting new idustry to the area. TRANSPORTATION - In addition to the Port, the existence of major state highways — State Highways 225 and 146 — and the availability of good rail ser- vice are additional important attractions for La Porte, VACANT LAND -Land availability at reasonable prices has already caused substantial development of new residences in the western portions of La Porte. Reasonable land prices will continue to attract developers, particularly as vacant land in sur- rounding communities is used. Some of the COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPOR- TUNITIES that are mast likely for La Porte include: • Development of recreational opportunities along the bay. • Supporting services in conjunction with the Container Port at Barbours Cut. • Light manufacturing and assembly operations that utilize container shipping for exports to Europe and '7outh America. ansportation and warehousing operations in sup- port of the Container Port. • Manufacturing operations utilizing the petrochemi- cals currently being produced near La Porte. INDUSTRY ' Currently, LaPorte s Industrial base consists almost ex- clusively of pe_ trochemical operations. The future m.offers little in`t_he way;of growth of these operations in the area, due primarily to: environmental considera- tions and the trend to locate such plants overseas. While La Porte will not see'a decline in these indus- tries over the next few years, a diversification of the industrial base will be necessary to provide employ- ment opportunities and expand the City's tax base. Therefore, the plan has identified the industry La Porte must target to bring to the area. Types of industries La Porte can expect to attract in the future include: • Export Manufacturing • Transportation Services • Warehousing 3 n rl o EM L Gam•�r Iff Cf ��lll:il�K17�51J: III ■ii II S PP Y S: Gj1 II ►a�®®. v . - r - : ' -1 I1PI i s 3 ff •3, 1 : - a 9 ! x , Rs • {I ll nx . ic . 3axt.:4: + .t . , : 1 • LANU USE�W A When fully d ve oped, a Porte will exhibit the fol- f 5 Y IMAAh lowing land -use charactenstics i -1, r } ower-de:tom, t nsity residential development located to ,orm theMw nuevo"cleus for distinct neighborhood com- plexes,`buffered from noncompatible activity by higher=density residential areas, parks, and selected public facilities. • Public service facilities located to provide easy access to residents with central facilities concen- trated along Fairmont Parkway between State High- way 146 and Broadway. - • Industrial development following the two major rail corridors along State Highway 225 and west of State Highway146.:r' - • Commercial development encouraged to concentrate in one of two commercial centers on the east and west sides of La Porte or along a corridor tying the two centers. THOROUGHFARES La Porte's thoroughfares are designed to give the City a transportation network unsurpassed in meeting cur- rent and future traffic demands. With its system of roads and thoroughfares, La Porte will be able to: • Facilitate a free flow of through traffic on State 'ighways 225 and 146 without disruption to local .affic flows. • Link La Porte with a system of high -capacity streets that provide efficient access to all City activity cen- ters, keeping residential streets free from through traffic. • Attract major traffic flows through La Porte's primary retail centers. • Divert [ruck traffic serving Barbours Cut from local streets and intersections. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The focus of La Porte is to become ahigh- when fully developed. Because of the relationship between home prices and density, the plan offers a variety of housing densities commensurate with income levels enjoyed by La Porte's citizens. Specifi- cally, La Porte's residential development is designed to: • Ensure neighborhood quality by buffering neighbor- hoods from noncompatible development. • Allow developers to offer homes that are affordable within projected financial conditions of the 1980s ;d '9os. Provide for retail, recreational, and public service facilities in close proximity. • Retain La Porte's image as a family community. W, i tMo _ ({ - j - AAA -s.e.aen an.:ei -Ad :' x , _A ».. do i� Will %111M-h11111t11MdW1. EA It so 31 dill 4� €!; COMMUNITY FACILITIES j La Porte will continue to offer its citizens and visitors a high level of public service facilities. La Porte's out- (C) awlN,°i standing school system will continue to set the stan- I`I_I:ID�r,".II dard for excellence in the City, but additional emphasis Ixj pIth " will be placed on expanded health and cultural facili- (°I ties. Social services and public safety also will expand to meet La Porte's growing needs. Example projects include: - _ • A full -service hospital ff �a g j • A cultural center with multipurpose auditorium/ l•�'Sj B theater complex. LoL'-E • A social center to serve social and group activities { r COMMUNITY FACILITIES 4�"e serving youth, senior citizens, and other citizen GRAPHIC DEPICTING RELATIONSHIPS REiMEETI ACTIYRY CEMTEMS� IMDUSiHIAL. AM RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. groups. • Expanded fire and police facilities designed to offer quick response throughout La Porte. PARKS AND BEAUTIFICATION Making La Porte an attractive place to live and visit is a primary objective of its citizens. This plan places emphasis on City beautification in which the natural beauty of the bay and bayous can be developed and maintained in conjunction with additional parks and recreation facilities. Specifically, La Porte's beautifica- tion plan calls for: • A system of regional, community, and neighborhood parks linked by bicycle and pedestrian trails to serve the City and its environs:' • Designation of major segments of the bayous of La Porte as conservation areas'. • Development of a major bay -front public recreation facility. ' • Landscaping and signage of City entrances, special attractions, major thoroughfare and pedestrian inter- sections, and rights -of -way. UTILITIES Proper development of La Porte will not be curtailed by inadequate or insufficient public utilities. Sufficient water, sewer, drainage, and power capacities are plan- ned to adequately meet La Porte's future development needs in the most efficient and technically effective manner. The City of La Porte has the resources needed to upgrade and expand its utility systems to ensure: • The availability of potable water supply sufficient to meet future needs without unmanaged groundwater withdrawal. • Sewage collection and treatment capacity to meet all of La Porte's future sanitary sewer needs. • Outfall drainage facilities capable of eliminating the danger of flooding, even under severe conditions. - 0 E°eNlTkdfaa PMY _ Tail sTN• t, I u W PARK SYSTEM AND CITY BEAUTIFICATION GAPNIC UEPIDTIN• WE TNOMgIGM#MQ AND AREAS t •C]t ' ro °E SE JiIEG IN RELATIONSHIP N THE "aPWED PANE AND WAIL STSIEY FOR LATEPoM •� x , 1 M PL�E M E N T A T M OWN N"x�S 11 The implementation"of this comprehensive plan million in additional tax bonds. Thus, current revenue j fires a continuous and dedicated effort on the part sources can support about $20 million in additional .11 citizens of La Porte: Specifically, implementation ` debt'vt leaving a shortfall of about $16 million, d regwre La Porte to adopt '.; }' " Several proposed projects can be expected to A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM — PRODUCE ADDITIONAL REVENUES, A,CAPITAL FINANCING PLAN WOO.s Bay Front Development • A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE * f t .• •New Cultural Center k CAPITAL IMPROVEM N $ New Government Facilities 1 Other proposed projects may be supportable through A five-year program of capital improvements identifies SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHARGES. the infrastructure on which La Porte takes its initial steps into the :futur Iytost of these projects are in • Stormwater Drainage direct response to the needs and wishes of those La Porte; citizens who responded to the surveys of resi- • Expanded Wastewater System dents'conducted as apart of this plan. Those improve- • Sidewalks and Trails meots that will be the responsibility of La Porte's city government to finance are highlighted below. • Recreation Facilities FINANCING Probable costs for the above improvements total approximately S36 million. To finance this five-year program, La Porte will need to issue improvement bonds, which can be paid for from a variety of revenue sources: • Local tax revenues • Utility system user charges • Development fees 'acility lease and use charges uring the next five years, current waterlsewer rates can support additional bonds totaling about 88 million and expected 1985 tax rates will support about $12 Still, it is unlikely that all of the proposed projects can be financed without some tax rate increase. It will, of course, be up to the citizens of La Porte to determine whether the proposed projects are WORTH AN INCREASE IN TAXES. just over half of those sur- veyed in this project indicated they WOULD support a tax increase to improve their City. NING ZO As part of this comprehensive plan, a draft of a new zoning map and corresponding ordinance has been prepared. The proposed zoning is in direct response to this comprehensive plan and the resulting master plan. Once adopted, this proposed zoning will become the blueprint by which the future La Porte is developed, It 1 to Ir. - I. SUM 'epr Lted ENHA RESIC 3WNxIt Y1G; rpILI 't GIVr Ii' plan as ITT Itl 3 t a Z > t cy s rt S"ATTRACTION AS A ro } (DUAL CHARACTER OF IT HOODS ,, r � 1 CATION OF THE CITY NTIAL FOR NEW RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. IMIT EXPANSION OF HEAVY INDUSTRY WITHIN rHE CITY. ENCOURAGE THE UNIFICATION OF LA PORTE, PROVIDE MORE PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES.' Most'elements of this plan are established specifically to meet these goals: • Good Utility Service •Improved Drainage _any oeauuu�aLwI I • Citywide Recreation • Major Park Projects • Social and Cultural Centers • Effective Zoning • Quality Housing Development • Improved Thoroughfares • Bayou Conservation • Bay -Front Development • Health Center • Retail Centers This is the comprehensive plan for La Porte's future. It is now the responsibility of the PEOPLE OF LA PORTE, with the help of enlightened leadership, to MAKE THE PLAN A REALITY. LA PORTE STANDS READY TO OPEN ITS DOOR TO THE FUTURE .. . IV t • IT TurnerCollie(D Braden Inc. CITY OF LA PORTE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME 1 APRIL 27, t984 IN ASSOCIAT/ON W/TH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC. Neil E. Bishop, Ph.D., P.E. Project Director . f . P. McAlister, P.E. Senior Vice President CONSULTING ENGINEERS TEXAS AUS TINIDALLASIEL PASOIHOVSTON�PORT ARTHUR COLORADO OENVERICRAND (UNCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Turner Collie & Braden Inc. would like to thank all those individuals and organizations who through their cooperation and participation made it possible to prepare this Comprehensive Plan report. Special thanks to: CITIZENS OF LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Bayshore National Bank Entex Inc. First City Bank Fred Buxton & Associates Harris County Houston Chamber of Commerce Houston -Galveston Regional Area Council Houston -Galveston Regional Transportation Study Houston Lighting & Power Company La Porte Chamber of Commerce La Porte Independent School District Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Port of Houston Authority Rice Center State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Southern Pacific Development Company Southern Pacific Transportation Company Texas Commerce Bank TurnerCollie�Braden Inc PARTICIPANTS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Project Director Dr. Neil E. Bishop, P.E. Project Manager William L. Metzger Capital Finance Charles V. Brophy Joseph M. Langan Computer Applications Michael L. Miller, P.E. E. Stan Watson Economics and Market Donald G. Reynolds Joseph M. Langan J. Hal Patton Environmental Michael J. Toohill Michael L. Miller, P.E. Graphics Allan W. Ritchie G. W. Straker Fernando De LaRosa Master Plan David G. Mayagoitia Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. TCB Data Systems Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. TurnerCollie�cSBnden Inc PARTICIPANTS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Cont'd) Stormwater Drainage Alan J. Potok, P.E. Transportation Dr. Ronald W. Holder, P.E. Robert E. Sutton, P.E. Wastewater Min Chu, P.E. Donald R. Sarich Water Frederick R. Bernsee, P.E. Shirley Webster Zoning Vernon G. Henry, AICP Mary Lou Henry, AICP Randall Walter, AICP Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Vernon Henry & Associates Vernon Henry & Associates Vernon Henry & Associates TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page •VOLUME I INTRODUCTION i Authorization Scope of Work SECTION -l.0 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-1 1.1 Master Plan 1.2 1.2 Land•Use Plan 1.5 1.3 Thoroughfare Plan 1.12 1.4 Utilities Plan 1029 1.5 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan le43 1.6 Community Facilities Plan 1.50 1.7 Residential Development Plan l•57 1.8 Beautification and Conservation Plan 1.62 1.9 Safety Plan 1'68 1.10 Redevelopment 144 lull Capital Improvement Program 145 1.12 Capital Financing 1-80 VOLUME11 SECTION 2.0 ZONING AND SUBDIVISION CONTROLS 2.1 2.1 Zoning 2-1 2.2 Subdivision Controls 2-12 APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Zoning Ordinance Draft - Zoning Map Appendix 2 - Subdivision Ordinance VOLUME III SECTION 3.0 MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3.1 3.1 Alternative Growth Strategies 3.2 3.2 Expected Population Growth 3.6 3.3 Projected Land -Use Allocation 3.7 3.4 Specific Growth Industries for La Porte ill SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENT 4.1 4.1 History 4-1 4.2 Economic Environment 4-2 4.3 Physical Environment 4-16 SECTION 5.0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 5-1 5.1 Environmental Analysis 5.1 5.2 Planning Issues and Alternatives 5.7 5.3 Final Development Approach 5 11 BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES Appendix 3 -Public Opinion Surveys and Interviews _. Appendix 4 - Recreatienal Facility Guidelines Appendix 5 -Community Facility Guidelines Appendix 6 - Capital Improvement Program Detail TumerCollie�Br�tden Inc LIST OF TABLES AND EXHIBITS Title Page TABLES Table 1 Land -Use Plan - Land -Use Comparison 1-10 Table 2 Thoroughfare Plan - Thoroughfare Capacity Parameters 1-16 Table 3 Thoroughfare Plan - Relationship of Existing Streets to the Proposed Thoroughfare Plan 1-17 Table 4 Thoroughfare Plan - Proposed Improvements 1-21 Table 5 Thoroughfare Plan - Proposed Thoroughfare Improvements Summary 1-25 Table 6 Thoroughfare Plan - Intersection and Grade Separation Responsibilities 1-26 Table 7 Utilities Plan - Stormwater Drainage Proposed Project Summary 1-35 Table 8 Utilities Plan - Potable Water System Development Schedule Adjustment 1-37 Table 9 Utilities Plan - Proposed Water Distribution System Improvement Schedule 1-38 Table 10 Proposed Wastewater Collection and Treatment System Improvements 1-40 Table 11 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan - Proposed Facilities 1-47 Table 12 Community Facilities Plan - Proposed Facility Projects 1-52 Table 13 Community Facilities Plan - Implementation of Facility Projects 1-54 Table 14 Residential Development Plan 1-61 Table 15 Beautification and Conservation Plan - Proposed Improvements 1-67 Table 16 Safety Plan - Evacuation Route Capacities 1-72 TumerCollie�Braden Inc LIST OF TABLES AND EXHIBITS (Cont'd) Title Page TABLES (Cont'd) Table 17 Proposed Capital Improvement Program - Probable Cost Summary 1-76 Table 18 Proposed Capital Improvement Program - Probable Costs for the 5-Year Improvement Program and the Long Term 1-78 Table 19 Major Financing Sources 1-85 Exhibit 1 Location Map Exhibit 2 Master Plan Exhibit 3 Residential Land Use Exhibit 4 Industrial Land Use Exhibit 5 Commercial Land Use Exhibit 6 Public and Open Space Uses Exhibit 7 Thoroughfare Plan Exhibit 8 Thoroughfare Implementation Map Exhibit 9 City Thoroughfare Improvement Priorities Exhibit 10 Utilities Plan - Stormwater Drainage Exhibit 11 Utilities Plan - Potable Water System Exhibit 12 Utilities Plan - Wastewater Collection and Treatment System Exhibit 13 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan Exhibit 14 Community Facilities Plan Exhibit 15 Beautification and Conservation Plan Exhibit 16 Safety Plan TurnerCollie�Braden Inc INTRODUCTION The City of La Porte, in an effort to manage future growth in an orderly and rational manner, retained Turner Collie & Braden Inc. in association with LWFW Inc. and Vernon G. Henry & Associates to develop a Comprehensive Plan for La Porte, Texas. The Comprehensive Plan updates the existing Master Plan of La Porte and provides the basis for review of La Porte's existing zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan provides the City with a general development framework for: 1 o An interpretation of City Council policies and designs that allows citizen feedback and permits the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan on a continuous basis. o Orderly growth of the community instituting a high level of environmental quality over the planning period. Implementation priorities based on the community's desired economic and demographic development. A 5-year capital improvement program compatible with the community's economic capabilities and potential. A tool for intergovernmental coordination and negotiation of responsibilities and activities. o Flexibility to accommodate changing requirements over time based on improved standards and goals as instituted by local decision -makers and citizens. A common reference source of information from which subsequent development studies can be based. Authorization The La Porte Comprehensive Plan was authorized by an agree- ment and letter of authorization between the City of La Porte and Turner Collie & Braden Inc. dated September 26, 1983. TurnerCollieC4Braden lnc 1. 1 Scope of or The Comprehensive Plan was developed within the framework of the following scope of work. Task 1.0 we Public Information Program 1.1 Establish a public involvement program. 1.1.1 Meet with a Steering Committee formed by the City and evaluate the study's progress at seven review meetings during the course of the project. 1.1.2 Conduct four public meetings held at study mile- stones at which study progress reports will be presented by the consultant for general comment. 1.1.3 Develop a phone survey of citizens to be con- ducted by City personnel under consultant supervision. 1.1.4 Develop a survey form to be printed in local newspaper. 1.1.5 Prepare periodic new releases for local newspaper. 1.1.6 Prepare a slide presentation describing the planning effort to be developed in phases corresponding to the phases of the Comprehensive Master Plan. 1.2 Record citizen and public official attitudes and goals and define policies which were used to determine the community's physical development. This documentation was presented at the second public meeting. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc. 111 1.3 Prepare and submit 30 copies of this technical report summarizing all findings and conclusions of the Comprehensive Master Plan project. 1.4 Prepare and submit 250 copies of a two-color, soft-cover booklet of no more than 8 pages. This booklet is designed to publicize the Comprehensive Plan effort. Task 2.0 - Physical Environment Documentation 2.1 Collect physical data --topography, flood plain loca- tions, ecological compositions of the area, etc. These data will be documented on graphic overlays prepared in a format that will correspond to base maps provided by the City. These overlays will be accompanied by written descriptions of the prevailing physical conditions. 2.2 Collect utility services data --water, sewer, power, transportation, and communications. These data will be documented in tabular and graphic overlay format with accompanying written descriptions on the status of each of the services similar to 2.1 above. 2.3 Collect community facilities data --educational, health, recreational, etc. These data will be documented in tabular and map formats, accompanied by written descriptions on supply and demand trends. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1V 0 - Market Analysis and Economic Developmenoil 3.1 Investigate and analyze market and economic data for the region, county, and City. Statistics will be gathered and interviews with area economists and business leaders will be performed. Previous studies and available private and public sector sources will be utilized where appropriate. Specific attention will be given to trends in La Porte's competitive position compared with neighboring cities. Analysis will include: 3.1.1 Population and demographics --local and Harris County. 3.1.2 Retail establishments and sales --local and regional. 3.1.3 Commercial and business expansion. 3.1.4 Industry location trends to include petro- chemical, tourism, other. 3.2 Model the local current and forecast economy of the City using Input/output Model. Evaluations regarding the impact of no more than three alternatives and projected growth scenarios will be developed. 3.3 Identify optimal strategies that yield positive market growth and quality -of -life factors. 3.4 Project economic and tax funding sources that correspond to the optimal development strategies. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc V 3.5 Determine the optimal planning strategy that best satis- fies community goals, supports the execution of policies previously formulated, and is economically feasible. �s and Residen 4.1 Determine the number and type of land -use requirements and sequencing of development of the community facilities necessary to serve La Porte during the planning period. 4.1.1 Establish current supply of community services. 4.1.2 Develop facility requirements on the basis of established population projections for: educational and cultural facilities, health facilities, recreational and sports facilities, governmental facilities, public open space and park facilities, and communication and transportation facilities. 4.2 Establish residential densities anticipated in the City anA determine residential land -use requirements over the planning period. 4.2.1 Analyze current residential development krends and develop conclusions as to type and level of resi- dential development expected for the area. 4.2.2 Prepare projections of future residential demands. Task 5.0 - Physical Plan Design 5.1 Prepare draft layouts illustrating the land use, area parameters, and environmental conditions consistent with TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc. V1 appropriate urban design principles and the economic develop- ment alternatives developed in Task 3.2. 5.2 Prepare a final Master Plan to reflect community atti- tudes and goals illustrating and documenting the physical planning elements. The Master Plan will include the prepa- ration of the following principal elements. 5.2.1 Circulation System Plan --design of the vehicular, pedestrian public transportation, and rail and air net- works and plans. 5.2.2 Land -Use System Plan --distribution of industrial, residential, open space and recreation land uses, the allocation of specific sites for community service facilities, and the definition of redevelopment and historical and scenic preservation areas. 5.2.3 Public Services System Plan --define general rights -of -way necessary for power, communications, and natural gas subsystems. Recommendations will be made as required to adapt or update the water distribution, and the stormwater drainage subsystems. Land -use distribution layouts will be available at this time for the wastewater plan. 5.2.4 Conservation and Natural Resources Plan --identify areas for preservation because of their ecological value to the City and its environment. TurnerCollieC46raden lnc V11 5.2.5 Recreation and Open Space Plan --define public and private amenity open space areas. 5.2.6 Residential Development Plan --establish prin- ciples and standards for the distribution of resi- dential land uses and project land -use distribution of the different types of residential use expected to be developed over the planning period. 5.2.7 Public Facilities Plan --identify the location and site requirements of the public facilities required by the City as indicated in the Community Facilities Requirements component. 5.2.8 Redevelopment Program --address the issues of urban and rural blight and establish physical develop- ment recommendations to integrate these areas with the City's mainline development. 5.2.9 Safety Program Plan --identify elements required to protect the City against fire and hurricanes. Task 6.0 - Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances 6.1 ,Collect and review existing zoning and subdivision ordinances. 6.2 Develop and recommend land -use subdivision and con- struction guidelines. 6.3 Develop and recommend final subdivision controls. Turner Collie(�SBraden Inc 6.4 Construct and recommend zoning district land -use desig- nations and controls on a graphic overlay consistent with the master plan base map. Task 7,0 - Capital Improvement and Implementation Program 7.1 Review with appropriate City management the current operating and capital budgeting plans of the City. Examine historical expenditure programs and sources. obtain atti- tudes toward citizen taxation and future bond program feasibility. 7.2 Investigate current and potential funding sources from federal, state, and county; private sector alternatives. 7.3 Construct financial plan that coincides with the master plan implementation --noting alternative strategies as available and recommend planning approach. 7.4 Conduct review session with City financial management to construct action plan consistent with City policies and charter. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1.0 1.1 Master Plan 1.2 Land -Use Plan 1.3 Thoroughfare Plan 1.4 Utilities Plan 1.5 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan 1.6 Community Facilities Plan 1.7 Residential Development Plan 1.8 Beautification and Conservation Plan 1.9 Safety Plan 1.10 Redevelopment 1.11 Capital Improvement Program 1.12 Capital Financing SECTION 1.0 - THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This is a Comprehensive Plan for the future development of 1-1 La Porte, Texas. The City of La Porte is located on the extreme eastern portion of Harris County, Texas, adjacent to Galveston Bay, approximately 20 miles from the central business district of Houston. La Porte is easily accessible from the west by State Highway (SH) 225, Spencer Highway, and Fairmont Parkway, from the north by SH 146, and from the south by SH 146, Broadway, and Bay Area Boulevard. La Porte has major industrial employment centers within its corporate limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction and is in close proximity to other major industrial employment centers in Deer Park, Pasadena, Baytown, and Bayport. In addition, the City has an enviable waterfront location on Galveston Bay and is the gateway to the Houston Ship Channel (see Exhibit 1). La Porte's particular environs allow the opportunity to apply creative planning solutions directed at providing an appropriate "fit" between " industrial and residential development, leisure and commercial activity, o vehicular and pedestrian circulation, public use and open space, and utility and capital needs with the City's projected development. These solutions need to be provided within a framework that will enhance La Porte's viability as a residential community with high environmental and quality of living standards. The framework TurnerCollie(SBradenlnc 1-2 is established through this Comprehensive Plan which defines policies for La Porte's future economic, environmental, and financial growth on the basis of the goals and objectives of La Porte's citizens. The Master Plan, in turn, translates the policy statement into specific proposals by defining through each of its compo- nents the principles, standards, and specific actions that will ultimately achieve the goals and objectives defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1.1 Master Plan Exhibit 2 illustrates the recommended Master Plan for La Porte's ultimate development. In essence, the Master Plan reflects the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan as attained throughout the planning process by citizen surveys, public information meetings, and the input provided by the La Porte Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. Conceptually, the Master Plan is intended to bring together all the components that contribute to the City's long-term development. These components are: a land use, o thoroughfares, o utilities, recreation and open space facilities, o public facilities, TurnerCollie `c�Braden Inc 1-3 o residential development, o beautification and conservation areas, o safety measures, and o redevelopment activity. Each component of this list will include specific actions; all must be consistent with La Porte's current and future projected market and economic development opportunities which define the City's growth prospects and financial capability. These two factors ultimately determine the feasibility of implementing the plan's proposed actions. Of the nine components that form the proposed Master Plan, five require capital outlays from the City of La Porte to achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Improvement Program is formed by these five Master Plan compo- vents, which are: o the Thoroughfare Plan, the Utilities Plan, o the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan, o the Community Facilities Plan, and the Beautification and Conservation Plan. The Capital Improvement Program is divided into two programs --the 5-year and the long term. The 5-year program includes all pro- posed actions considered as priorities within each of the Master Plan components. The long-term program includes those actions TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-4 which are necessary to achieve the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan by the time La Porte is fully developed (35 years). This Comprehensive Plan demonstrates a specific approach to development and promotes long-term desired environmental and physical results which are achieved through the continuous application of a zoning ordinance. Consequently, the zoning ordinance is the short-term, day-to-day administrative tool which guides development maintaining the standards and goals of the Comprehensive Plan, The Master Plan illustrated in Exhibit 2 is intended to obtain the goals and objectives established in the Comprehensive Plan and has been designed specifically to o upgrade the economic and environmental realities of La Porte, o promote La Porte as a residential community, manage the development of heavy industrial activity within the city limits, o maximize the potential for retail development, o preserve the distinct character of the existing resi- „ dential neighborhoods, o encourage a high level of interaction between the City's different areas, provide for the development of leisure -oriented activi- ties and natural amenities, o guide the development of public utilities and facilities consistent with projected growth, and o focus on the needs and requirements of La Porte's exist- ing population. TurnerCollie�Br denlnc 1-5 Subsequent parts of this section of the report will define how each component of the Master Plan achieves the stated goals of the La Porte Comprehensive Plan. 1.2 Land -Use Plan The City of La Porte has more than tripled its size in the past three decades through the annexation of adjacent land. This expansion has had the following effects. o The City's land base has increased, particularly vacant areas which currently constitute 39 percent of the City's total developable area. These areas have created large gaps between existing development. o Distinctly different boundary conditions have been estab- lished, of which an important portion is constituted by heavy industrial areas. Developed areas which are socially, economically, and environmentally different from one another have been aggregated. o Thoroughfare continuity has decreased and travel distances have increased. These effects have caused increased travel times within the City and have tended to disrupt land use and activity patterns. o Prevailing community character and outlook has been lost; i.e., the original city core was a residential -leisure community which turned to the bay front as its principal amenity, and today there is little sense that a bay front exists or that La Porte is a single community. While all these effects are not necessarily negative, they bring about an important issue which the Master Plan addresses. Does La Porte need to be a homogeneous city or should it recognize the existing diversity within its limits? Public opinion indicated to the consultant team that a single overall driving force for the TurnerCollie(4Braden lnc 1-6 City as a whole should prevail, yet the distinct character of each of the areas within La Porte shall be preserved. Through the strategic distribution of an uses, the Land -Use Plan attempts to attain this concept. o Residential, o Industrial, o Commercial, and Land uses shown are classified as: o Public and Open Space Uses. A discussion on the concepts of land -use distribution for each of the land -use categories listed in the Land -Use Plan follows. 1.2.1 Residential Land Use Residential land use is divided into three land -use categories; each reflects a range of densities that include different housing types. These land -use categories are: 0 2-8 dwelling units (D[I) per gross residential acre - this residential land -use classification includes primarily single-family detached housing types. 0 9-14 dwelling units per gross residential acre - this residential land -use classification includes primarily single-family attached housing types and low -density multifamily units such as duplexes and f.ourplexes. 0 15-32 dwelling units per gross residential acre - this residential land -use classification includes primarily multifamily units but may include higher density single-family housing types such as mobile homes. Exhibit 3 depicts the proposed distribution of resi- dential land uses in La Porte when the City is fully developed. The following characterize their distribution: TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc 1-7 o Low -density single-family detached development (2-8 DU/acre) is located to form the nuclei for distinct neighborhood areas. This type of development should be buffered from noncompatible activity of higher -density compatible uses. o Single-family attached development and low -density ' multifamily development (9-14 DU/acre) is located: to act as buffer areas between single-family detached development and higher -intensity uses* adjacent to major thoroughfares which have the capacity to support more intense residential development. - adjacent to and in support of activity, open space, and amenity areas. o Multifamily development (15-32 DU/acre) is located on major thoroughfares and intersections in prox- imity to principal activity and amenity areas. A detailed discussion on residential development issues is presented in part 1.6 of the report. 1.2.2 Industrial Land Use Industrial land use is divided into three land -use categories; each reflects Mn intensity and quality of industrial development. The land -use categories are: o Heavy Industrial - includes capital intensive pro- duction facilities with large land area require- ments, open yard activities and storage, railyards, and container -type storage installations. o Light Industrial - includes labor intensive assembly/production facilities with moderate to small land area requirements, covered warehousing facilities, and light transportation facilities. a Business/Industrial - includes multistructured office park development. TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc 1-8 Exhibit 4 illustrates the proposed location of industrial uses when the City is fully developed. The following characterizes their location: o Heavy industrial development is confined to areas traversed by major rail and utility corridors. o Light industrial buffers heavy industrial develop- ment from less intense uses and is to be located fronting principal thoroughfares. o Business/industrial buffers heavy industrial activity primarily from residential development and is located along high image areas. 1.2.3 Commercial Land Use Commercial land uses include retail and hotel activity and single -structure office space. Exhibit 5 illustrates the proposed location of commercial uses when the City is fully developed. Commercial development is encouraged to concentrate: in one of two proposed commercial centers located on the east and west sides of La Porte, o along a corridor in the two proposed commercial centers together, and a in neighborhood activity areas. Public and Open Space Uses Public uses include all noncommercial activities privately or publicly sponsored which are intended to serve the general public. Public uses include social, cultural, institu- tional, safety, recreational, etc. facilities; these are described in detail in the Community Facilities Plan (part 1.5). TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-9 Open space includes all landscaped open areas that are within the public domain; parks and trails constitute the majority of these types of land use. The Open Space and Pedes- trian System Plan (part 1.4) provides a detailed description of these facilities. Exhibit 6 illustrates the public and open space land uses as projected for the fully developed City. The following characterize their location: o Public uses are encouraged to locate in support of City activity centers. The principal concentra- tion of these uses occurs at the major commercial center proposed between SH 146 and Broadway north of Little Cedar Bayou. The purpose is to aggregate a majority of the institutional uses in a single area in order to increase the quality of public service. a Open space is located in support of neighborhood activity areas and is linked by a system of trails and pedestrian walkways; these form a circuit throughout the City that ties all major community areas. 1.2.5 Land -Use Mix Table 1 compares the existing land use, the projected land -use demand mix established in the market analysis (part 3.3), and the land -use mix achieved in the layout of the Land -Use Plan. Principal observations regarding this comparison are as follows. o Residential land uses are projected to increase in acreage 35 percent in La Porte by the time the City is fully developed. The 5,926-acre target was underachieved in the actual distribution of residential uses by 404 acres. This is partially TurnerCollieCSSBraden lnc 1-10 TABLE 1 - LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND -USE PLAN - LAND -USE COMPARISON (Acres) Projected Land -Use Existing Demand Master Plan (1984) (2018) (Buildout) Residential Rural 1,903 0 0 Single -Family 2,299 51526 5,076 Multifamily 38 400 446 Transient 144 0* 0* Commercial 185 494 620 Industrial 346 625 982 Public Uses 212 424 424 Open Space 80 378 381 Rights -of -Way 1,092 21045 1,909 Airport 298 351 351 Railyard 38 115 115 Vacant Areas 3,719 0 0 Water Areas 834 834 834 TOTAL LAND AREA 11,188 11,188 11,188 TOTAL DEVELOPED 6,635 10,354 10,354 TOTAL UNDEVELOPED 41553 834 834 *Hotel space considered within commercial land use. TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc. compensated by the 46 additional acres of multi- family residential allocated and by increased areas achieved in the single-family residential 9-14 DU/acre category. A detailed description of the effects of this land -use distribution is shown in the Residential Development Plan (part 1.6). o Commercial land use is projected to increase 167 percent over the 34-year period until full development. The 494-acre target was surpassed by 126 acres; this is primarily due to three factors: The existing distribution of commercial uses, which are scattered throughout the City. The Comprehensive Plan has a goal of maximizing commercial locations throughout the City. - The planning concept used to develop the Master Plan requires a major linkage between the pro- posed commercial centers of the City. In order to support the viability of this linkage, com- mercial uses were allocated on each end of the linkage. a Industrial land uses are projected to increase 81 percent by the time the City is fully developed. The 625-acre target was surpassed by 357 acres in the Land -Use Plan primarily because - existing distribution of industrial uses is dis- persed throughout the City. This has the effect of extending the area of proposed industrial land use to recognize heavy industrial installa- tions which, because of their capital intensive nature, have a high resistance to change. - numerous areas exist within the City which, because of their unique location with regard to utility and transportation services, are by nature industrial. The designation of any other use to these areas would be incompatible with physical and market realities. o Public uses are projected cent by the time the City to increase by 100 per- is fully developed. The target of 424 acres is accommodated within the Land -Use Plan. A detailed description of the TurnerCollie�cSBraden Inc 1-12 facilities proposed to be included as part of this target are discussed in the Community Facilities Plan (part 1.5). Open space is projected to increase 372 percent by the time the City is fully developed. This increase reflects the need expressed by the people of La Porte for recreational and leisure oriented activity. The Land -Use Plan achieves this target. A detailed account of the facilities included as part of this target is presented in the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan (part 1.4). Rights -of -way currently constitute 16 percent of La Porte's developed area. Projections indicate that this relationship will increase by 25 percent while the Master Plan indicates only a 12.5 percent increase. This relationship will vary somewhat, depending on the specific development solutions implemented in the City's vacant areas and on the implementation of the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. o A 53-acre expansion of the La Porte Municipal Airport is envisioned in the Land -Use Plan. This expansion is intended to accommodate additional general aviation service and storage area require- ments and additional support facilities. o A 77-acre expansion of Southern Pacific's rail - yard is considered within the Land -Use Plan. The purpose of this expansion is to provide for support train storage track space demanded by Southern Pacific's clients. The railyard project is currently being reviewed by the City staff. Vacant areas cease to exist when La Porte is fully developed. Certainly, there will he individual lots or parcels scattered throughout the City which will not have been developed, but in general no land will remain vacant. 1.3 Thoroughfare Plan The need for a well -planned, integrated system of streets and hiyhways is very important to the proper development of La Porte. Streets provide space necessary for circulation between TurnerCollieC�B aden Inc. 1-13 the different areas of the community and the region, and their section and capacity have a direct impact on land use. The pro- posed Thoroughfare Plan is a principal component of the La Porte Master Plan, addressing the specific circulation needs and proposed land -use requirements. Thoroughfare Plan are to: Principal objectives of the a increase accessibility to and from La Porte by tying the local street system to the regional thoroughfare system, o maximize mobility within the community by separating the street system local traffic from through traffic, o link major activity and employment centers in order to reduce local travel times, o discourage heavy truck traffic destined to Barbours Cut, industrial areas in the City extraterritorial limits, and industrial areas within city limits from using local city thoroughfares, and o provide the necessary thoroughfare capacities to serve adequately future traffic growth. Planning principles that govern the Thoroughfare Plan and were adhered to during its development are: o Through traffic should concentrate on highways with controlled or semi -controlled access. o Thoroughfares should be spaced to accommodate traffic needs of the areas in which they occur at the time the City is fully developed. These thoroughfares shall be more closely spaced in commercial, industrial, and more densely populated sections and farther apart in outlying areas. The maximum desirable spacing is at one -mile intervals. o Thoroughfares should be as straight and continuous as possible and should border on City functional areas, such as neighborhoods or commercial centers. a Unlike thoroughfares, local streets should be indirect and discontinuous, discouraging through traffic. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-14 Thoroughfares are generally classified by their capacity and function. The proposed Thoroughfare Plan identifies five distinct thoroughfare classifications. A summary of their characteristics follows. o Controlled Access Highways - These thoroughfares are high traffic volume freeways (without signalization on princi- pal lanes) designed for 4 to 8 main lanes and 4 service lanes with a right-of-way (ROW) capacity that allows 2 to 4 additional lanes. Peak -hour traffic capacity for these roads is in the range of 1,200-1,800 vehicles per hour per lane. o Semi -Controlled Access Highways - These thoroughfares are designed for 8 moving lanes with a ROW capacity of up to 10 moving lanes. Signalized intersections on these thor- oughfares are spaced generally every 2 miles but no closer than at 1-mile intervals. Peak -hour traffic capacity is in the range of 800 to 1,000 vehicles per hour per lane. o Primary Arterials - These thoroughfares are four -lane divided with a ROW capacity that allows for the addition of two lanes. Peak -hour traffic capacity for these thor- oughfares is in the range of 600-800 vehicles per hour per lane. Signalized intersections on these thoroughfares are spaced generally every mile but no closer than at 1/2-mile intervals. The primary function of this type of thoroughfare is to distribute local and outside traffic to major employment and activity centers. a Secondary Arterials - These thoroughfares are four -lane divided. ROW is limited on these thoroughfares to the proposed capacity. Peak -hour traffic capacity for these thoroughfares is less than 600 vehicles per hour per lane, and signalized or signed intersections are generally spaced at 1/2-mile intervals. The primary function of this type of thoroughfare is to distribute local traffic to principal neighborhood areas. a Local Collectors - These streets are four -lane undivided local roads in which two lanes are moving lanes and two lanes are designated for parking. Peak -hour traffic capacity for these roads is in the range of 400-600 vehicles per hour per lane. Intersections on these thoroughfares are generally signed only at 1/4-mile intervals. The primary function of these streets is to distribute local traffic within the neighborhood areas. TurnerCollie(cSBradenInc 1-15 Table 2 establishes the capacity parameters for the thoroughfares described above. Exhibit 7 depicts the proposed Thoroughfare Plan and defines each of the thoroughfares' desig- nation according to the above description. Table 3 relates existing streets to the proposed Thoroughfare Plan, The Thoroughfare Plan presented in Exhibit 7 is expressed in its most basic form. In this exhibit, the proposed thoroughfares, their classifications, and relationships to the existing street system are identified. Also, the plan as shown outlines the relationship of each of the proposed thoroughfares to the overall system and is the result of applying the planning objectives and principles previously discussed. Key achievements of the plan include o the establishment of a continuous grid system spaced at 1. to 3/4 mile, the majority being within existing rights -of -way, a a distribution of street capacities which will accommo- date projected land uses and densities, o the linkage of the proposed thoroughfare system to the regional thoroughfare system, and o the selective routing of through, local, and heavy truck traffic. Specific actions to achieve the objectives of the Thorough- fare Plan are defined in the Thoroughfare Implementation Map (Exhibit S). This map translates the Thoroughfare Plan recom- mendations into specific actions necessary to implement the Thoroughfare Plan. The type of actions considered are: TurnerCollie(SSBradenlnc ro 0 0 0 O O o o o ro 0 >441 O co cn .y F4j 0 0 of 0 0 a 0 >i V .c c O O O O O .Mi ro 41 to O O O H a•� c m ro ro$ x O N co N O N v .y O) c l > a)O(o L E a) E c 7 W to z O o-4 N Q7 V' Ir - N 4J Sa U GL c O O O ro ro o 0 0 cL rn .a o 0 U a) O >r •� C O O O O r O O C O O m>1 O C C ro> ro m r ❑ �- A .� rn r v )n (1) d ro U ro U *. �] +J (L) L+ U> m O ro- o s. co 0 a >Y {4 - o 0 I C1 r-I x OOJ 1 $4 CD I o � 04 r o CD 0 0 O _ o �o 0 x U + m %o v v i O - d row U � O- C13 0 0 0 0 >+ C (n �O N O O Fa + N ro � ro L O L >4 U .ti +� •N >4 L+ �m cx �4 o '•'� O >1 ro ro (o 4J O N U N 14 •.a •a U Sa N I N N L c Sa .i a) +) N •� a) E N O a) rorml C U E U •.-I J..) U iJ U ••1 L a) Sa O O V d W d w d W d a V v c r x xx (n o +� w C N N to m N iJ 4J +J 4J � OI CC N pl pl � a d aJ a1 m N N. N N w C R S + L L L L F +� +J O O O O N L •n •n •n•n X 04 E E E E x-- F w w x F m >y C7 3 Z t N CD E >r >. U) T m H 3 3 X t UI t w O tl1 m N m m m m m m a m m m m N m a) L L L m (0 L L L '0 L m L L AS L a) L m U m U•....4 m m m-I d m m U a1 to U 4J 4J J•J L L iJ 4J 4J tJ . aJ L u yj L 41 U +J Z a L L L a) a) L L L . L N L L N L a L zc c aaa�4Jaaa 0 a 4J 4J a «a•1 F ••O+ a a >v >+ >. 4J >, a >Y >r 4 a s 11 r1 L L L L L L C L L L L .•I L m m m >i >4 m m m O m >, m m >1 m '•I m mw c O L4 'CVV'C L00LC0U > Om L c c c m m c c c I c m c c m c L c 4- +J000E E000 0 500E0410 m I N C U U V•+• 0 0 0 E 0 i U U•ti U C U z 0 N N N L L N 0 N N N L a a L N O 0 wzz wmmmmm a.mv.wmUm xaa w xaa a 2:ww cwa V a a Q, [+ N wxS . to w(C a) y 4J 1J > y >. L a) m 000 O m >,d d� >1m m d•.. a a a 0.S +J a) m a7 d 2 X 3 N L L O O 0 L 3 L L P%C UI L iJ N •0 a x x U m iJ t +J iJ yJ yJ L E iJ m iJ > ..7 E F +J L m Of m m 7 7 m a) we m iJ 124 a? +J CaT y I aJ Om SS C CV 3 N P4 I •.� •� N N L 0 0� N m L >> c C (n 0 01 c a) jJ m 3 N m m om£ 0 7 0 0 1 3 c •� L m �c 3 w N 7=t U 0 0 E+J .c L•H.m�a d •0 rl 3J N 1J 1J C JJ 4J Z.0 L L iJ (D L N L r•1 m 5 N •0 L L N CO N L L •.+ m L '0 L Cu > tJ 0 a m x-+00040mmmmr 0 c m• m%cx L E w mOz zm3wCC LMw.. z 04w - Mm lJ C 1-18 o Thoroughfares to be newly acquired and improved - these actions include all proposals for the development of new roads --ROW acquisition activities and surface, median, and curb -and -gutter improvements. o Thoroughfares to be widened requiring additional ROW - these actions include all proposals for the expansion of existing lanes or existing roads with inadequate rights - of -way to accommodate the proposed expansion --ROW acqui- sition activities, surface improvements on proposed new lanes, addition of medians, and curb -and -gutter improve- ments on existing and new lanes. o Thoroughfares to be widened within existing ROW - these actions include all proposals requiring additional lanes on an existing road for which the ROW is sufficient to accommodate the proposed expansion --surface improvements on proposed new lanes, addition of medians, and curb -and - gutter improvements on existing and new lanes. o Intersection improvements - these improvements include signalization or required signage at thoroughfare inter- sections. Intersections have been classified according to the type of thoroughfares which form the intersection. This classification is as follows. - Type A - Includes intersections formed by a primary arterial with a primary arterial. These intersections require signalization and signage. - Type e - Includes intersections formed by a primary arterial with a semi -controlled access highway. These intersections require signalization and signage. - Type C - Includes intersections formed by a primary arterial with a secondary arterial. These intersections require signalization and signage. Type D - Includes intersections formed by a primary arterial and a secondary arterial which ends at the intersection. These intersections require signalization and signage. - Type E - Includes intersections formed by a secondary arterial and a primary arterial which ends at the intersection. These intersections require signalization and signage. TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc 1-19 - Type F - Includes intersections formed by two secondary arterials. These intersections may require signaliza- tion but generally will require signage only. Type G - Includes intersections formed by two secondary arterials of which one ends at the intersection. These intersections require signage only. Type H - Includes intersections formed by the semi - controlled access highway and a secondary arterial ending at the intersection. These intersections require signage only. o Grade separation improvements - these actions include the development of overpass and interchange structures. They have been classified as follows. - Type 1 - Includes three -or -more -level highway -to -highway interchanges. - Type 2 - Includes two -level diamond highway to thorough- fare interchanges. Type 3 - Includes the overpass of a bridge or thorough- fare. In addition, the Thoroughfare Implementation Map identifies the proposed priority projects for the Thoroughfare Plan's successful accomplishment. These are listed in order of priority. o Priority 1 Projects - Improvement of the SH 225/SH 146 interchange to a four - level interchange which should include the flyover of the median lanes of SH 146 over Southern Pacific's railroad tracks. The development of this project is a responsibility of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT). It should be noted that this proposed action is highly dependent on the con- struction of the proposed bridge on SH 146 connecting Baytown to SH 225. The construction of this project has been delayed due to lack of available funding. - Development of an alternate truck route to the Barbours Cut Port Facility from SH 146 to Barbours Cut Blvd. through L Street and Broadway. This project must be TumerCollie `c�Bnden Inc 1-20 developed in conjunction with the proposed improvement of SH 225/SH 146 interchange. The development of this project is a City responsibility. o Priority 2 Projects Completion of the SH 146 grade separations at Barbours Cut Blvd. and Fairmont Parkway. The development of these projects is a responsibility of SDHPT. o Priority 3 Projects - Completion of the median lanes and grade separations of SH 225 to its junction with SH 146. The development of this project is a responsibility of SDHPT. - Upgrade Underwood Street to a primary arterial standard from Fairmont Parkway to the proposed S Street inter- section. The development of this project is the respon- sibility of Harris County. o Priority 4 Projects - Completion of Bay Area Blvd. from Fairmont Parkway to Spencer Highway and upgrading to primary arterial stan- dards of Bay Area Blvd. from Spencer Highway to SH 225. The development of this project is the responsibility of Harris County. Completion of Underwood Street from the proposed S Street to SH 225 in conjunction with the City of Pasadena. The development of this project is the responsibility of Harris County. o Other Priority Projects may include: Upgrading Fairmont Parkway to a semi -controlled access highway by adding four median lanes. This project would fall under the responsibility of Harris County. Linkage of L Street to Barbours Cut Blvd. by joining L Street to H Street and to the extension of Barbours Cut Blvd. west of SH 146. This project is a Harris County responsibility. Table 4 provides a comprehensive list of all thoroughfare improvements considered under the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. TurnerCollie(cf Braden Inc 0 0 v 0 o O o 0 0 o C o c I c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o N o n a� v± o o a� O N .-i N N co fn t(1 m C%j en N OD Ln tD O i-1 N N O .-I O O C 0 O c C c O O I c O O O c O O O O O O I c O O O N c 10 a' O O O O O aT N m N m C N 1D tF 1C O ti n ti lD co C n N M 01 m %C f'1 tD .i N N rl G C C G G C C C C C C ro ro m ro m m m m ro m ro I I I I I I I I I I I I r-I V' V' i '•I N 1 O O O O O I O O C O 1 o C 0 0 L I 0 0 0 o O lfl Ln C r-I O N ffl C N n f+ - C Ln r-1 0 c c o c c o 0 o rh o C V1 C O C N N C C C '.0 N C Y�1 'y rl '-1 .-1 •-1 r-I ri r-i N .-I '•i u: � £3 c aL " > a4J > ji s� N 54 3 L4 L �L N N a�i L U Or U U �J W C W aC U En Lr) CT �I] la ECG C 7 N PC �4'0 41 41 J (�C7� j 41 .Cm 'C S�pi tN UT, ^ Z Z tr G] 0] tea'' S2 [C CT F [Tq c F� N N oC U y y Iw J -- y 4+ m 0 LOi %D 0 0 o o co .D to M m vi m o rn 4J Ln V 0 %C O o 0 0 CD o I C �j N M N O O O %O kO rn m co 0 co (n r W y.i r N O N H ON co U) C' C N N r- V' N m m m m m o c c c c c c i yo s W H ri VI' V' d' (N N C' C.� U� N •� W C O C O O O O I I •W.� C kO 0 LnO O O co O C N Ln O cc 7 N rn V' N m O G tOT ar m w r LO m c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N C C Ln N C C 0. O r 1 m O a c a U<) O sue. C 4 cxfl 5 F lJ C a N W C 1-24 This list is summarized in Table 5 assigning project responsi- bility to the City, Harris County, and SDHPT according to existing maintenance responsibilities and ROW ownership. It is important to note from this table 'that: o Of the approximately 9.1 million square feet of required ROW acquisition, the City will be responsible for approxi- mately 46 percent while Harris County and the SDHPT will be responsible for the remaining 54 percent. o Of the approximately 8.8 million square feet of surface improvements, which is equivalent to about 34 miles of a four -lane thoroughfare, the City will be responsible for approximately 43 percent (14.5 miles) while Harris County and the SDHPT will be responsible for 41 percent and 16 percent, respectively. • Of the approximately 0.5 million linear feet of curb and gutter improvements, the City will be responsible for 52 percent while Harris County and the SDHPT will be responsible for 20 percent and 28 percent, respectively. Table 6 lists the intersection and grade separation improve- ments proposed as part of the Thoroughfare Plan. Table 6 also defines the entity responsible for such improvements. It is important to note that: • The City of La Porte is currently responsible for all signalization and signage improvements at intersections within.the City. It is considered that this will continue to be the case under the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. • Grade separation improvements will fall primarily under SDHPT's responsibility, although Harris County will share this responsibility with two Type 3 grade separations. To summarize, the Thoroughfare Plan's proposed improvements are divided almost equally between the City and Harris County and the SDHPT. The City has a smaller share in ROW acquisition and TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc. Ln rmq a F 8 I I II 8 � N N m O pmp• ti .d I 8 O OI O� I 1 8 II 8 �I N M fmf N �L �Nfl f�•1 T ^1 N i I go cI € I I I 00 N SI C C N i I II II $I i I II II �I N� 1-26 TABLE 6 - LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THOROUGHFARE PLAN - INTERSECTION AND GRADE SEPARATION RESPONSIBILITIES Intersections City Type A 2 Type B 2 Type C 8 Type D 2 Type E 5 Type F 4 Type G 2 Type H TOTAL 27 Grade Separations City Count State GS Type 1 - - 2 GS Type 2 - - 6 GS Type 3 = 2 = TOTAL 0 2 6 Turner Collie(�Braden Inc 1-27 surface improvements, is fully responsible for the intersection improvements, and has no responsibilities in developing grade separations. In order that the proposed Thoroughfare Plan be implemented, the City must promote its requirements with the respective county and state authorities while at the same time committing resources to those projects which are the City's responsibility. Exhibit 9 identifies the proposed projects which are the responsibility of the City and establishes a priority ranking of these projects. These proposed priorities are listed below. o Priority 1 Projects - Alternate truck route to the Barbours Cut Port Facility from SH 146 to Barbours Cut Blvd. through L Street and Broadway. o Priority 2 Projects Development of Farrington Blvd* as a secondary arterial which will include: Surface, curb -and -gutter improvements on Farrington Blvd. from Crestway Street south to Fairmont Parkway. ROW acquisition, surface, and curb -and -gutter improve- ments for the proposed four lanes and median to be built north of Crestway Street to H Street. ROW acquisition for expansion, surface, and curb - and -gutter improvements for the proposed addition of two lanes and median to be built from H Street to L Street. ROW acquisition for surface and curb -and -gutter improvements for the proposed four lanes and median to be built from L Street to SH 225. TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc 1-28 o Priority 3 Projects Development of old La Porte Road from Underwood to SH 146. This will include ROW acquisition, surface, and curb -and -gutter improvements for the proposed four lanes and median to be built. o Priority 4 Projects Development of the north and south segments of 16th Street. The north segment includes: RUW acquisition for expansion from North G Street to L Street and land acquisition for new ROW from L Street to Old La Porte Road. Surface and curb -and -gutter improvements for the addition of two lanes and median between North G and L streets and similar improvements for four lanes and median between L Street and Old La Porte Road. The south segment includes: ROW acquisition for expansion between Fairmont Parkway and the proposed extension of Wharton Weems and land acquisition for new ROW between SH 146 and 16th Street for the proposed extension of Wharton Weems. Surface and curb -and -gutter improvements for the addition of four lanes and median between Fairmont Parkway and the proposed extension of Wharton Weems and similar improvements for four lanes and median for the proposed extension of Wharton Weems between SH 146 and 16th Street. o Priority Intersections - intersection between Barbours Cut Blvd. and the proposed alternate truck route from IH 146 (Type G). - intersection at Bay Area Blvd. and Main Street (Type A). - intersection at Bay Area Blvd. and Fairmont Parkway (Type B). - intersection at Farrington Blvd. and Main Street (Type C). TurnerCollieCSBraden lnc. 1-29 City Priority 1 thoroughfare projects and intersections have been included within the 5-year capital improvement program. The remaining projects are considered as part of future improvement programs. 1.4 Utilities Plan A precondition to the growth envisioned for the City of La Porte by the Master Plan is the availability of adequate utility services. These services include principally wastewater collec- tion and treatment, potable water storage and distribution, storm - water drainage, and power (electricity and gas) transmission. The Master Plan through the Utility Plan focuses primarily on the first three, since power transmission is provided by quasi -private organizations which, to a degree, are beyond the influence of this Master Plan.* Nevertheless, the Master Plan provides general guidelines re gar. ding the expansion of these utility systems within the City in paragraph 1.4.4. The City of La Porte has already done extensive utility planning. Specifically, the City contracted the services of O'Malley & Clay Inc. in 1982 to develop a Master Drainage Plan, Turner Collie & Braden Inc. in 1983 to (through the La Porte Area Water Authority) develop a Feasibility Study for Lony-Range *These organizations include Houston Lighting & Power and Entex Inc., which provide electrical and gas services to the City through their own utility networks. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc. 1-30 Potable Water Supply, and as a complementary part of this Compre- hensive Plan with Turner Collie & Braden Inc. to develop a Compre- hensive an for Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems. The Utilities Plan brinys these studies into the perspective of the Master an as a single component interrelated with the goals, objectives, and priorities set by the Comprehensive Plan. The Utilities Plan defines two time -related levels of priorities: o The short term includes the improvements necessary to alleviate existing problems, allowing for the increased growth projected within the Master Plan as a result of La Porte's market opportunities in the next 5 years. o The long term includes the improvement requirements necessary to satisfy needs when the City reaches full development. For each utility, the Plan addresses the following major areas of concern: o The stormwater drainage plan concentrates on the outfall drainage requirements of the City. Proposed recommenda- tions presented in this report will not include internal drainage systems. All recommendations will be based, at the City Engineer's request, on the preliminary floodway and flood plain study developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) which revises the 1976 FEMA Flood Insurance Maps. It was felt by City staff and the consultant team that the nature of the changes depicted in the preliminary study were of considerable positive impact to La Porte's future development and, given that these results have not been contested, adoption of the results of the preliminary study was appropriate. o The potable water plan redefines the proposed improvement schedule set in the Feasibility Study for Lony-Range Water Supply for the period of 1984-1989 on the basis of population projections developed in this Master Plan. Also, the potable water plan provides a calculation of the probable improvement costs for the system to satisfy City needs at the time the City reaches full development. TurnerCollieoBraden Inc. 1-31 o The wastewater collection and treatment plan references to the Comprehensive Wastewater Collection and Treatment Plan developed in conjunction with this effort. 1.4.1 Stormwater Drainage Exhibit 10 depicts the existing outfall drainage channels that make up the existing drainage system serving La Porte. In addition, Exhibit 10 defines proposed drainage bounda- ries and proposed improvements to the existing channels. The primary criterion used in the development of the first phase of the proposed drainage plan is to alleviate existing flooding problems. These problems were identified as a principal concern of La Porte's residents in the public opinion survey performed at the Master Plan's initiation. A general discussion on the principal drainage elements follows: o Drainaoe System F101-00-00*: This drainage system consists of a series of shallow roadside ditches draining primarily the northern portion of La Porte from proposed Farrington Blvd. to SH 146 and from H Street to SH 225. According to the Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD), the ditches are inadequate and shallow flooding is an existing problem. This system is constricted by a triple arch culvert under the Southern Pacific railroad yard and by the culverts on SH 146. HCFCD has investigated these bottlenecks to a certain extent and has estimated that necessary improvements at the railyard may approximate $375,000. Southern Pacific is currently working with HCFCD to improve the downstream portion of the system to SH 146. Two options were considered within the proposed drainage plan to improve the drainage conditions of F101-00-00. They are: *Harris County,Flood Control designations. TurnerCollie�cSBraden Inc 1-32 Diverting the channel to F216-00-00* and Little Cedar Bayou. - Diverting the west half of the drainage area to Big Island Slough (B106-00-00)*. The first of these options was discarded since HCFCD has investigated it and considers it inade- quate because of Little Cedar Bayou's limited downstream capacity. The second is proposed as part of the plan since it will temporarily resolve flooding problems and postpone the need to increase channel capacity under the Southern Pacific rail - yard. Calculations indicate that in the longer term, additional improvements to B106-00-00 will be necessary. It is recommended that an in-depth analysis of the system be performed with considera- tion given to the designation of B106-00-00 as a major improvement of the trail system. o Drainage System F216-00-UO*: This drainage system consists primarily of Little Cedar Bayou and a small drainage ditch south of the Southern Pacific railyard. According to HCFCD, the downstream capacity of the system is limited but funds are available for channel improvements downstream of . SH 146. Existing flooding problems, though, are concentrated in the upstream segment of this system as identified in FEMA insurance rate maps. The level of impact of the proposed HCFCD downstream improvements on upstream conditions is difficult to assess at this time, but analysis indicates that even with such improvements, earthen channel improvements will be required on the upstream portion of F216-00-00 to resolve flooding condi- tions within the time frame considered under the proposed improvement program. o Drainage System B112-UO-00*: This drainage system consists of a series of channels, of which major segments are lined in concrete, serving the western portion of Deer Park and the recently annexed Spenwick and College View areas. This *Harris County Flood Control designations. TurnerCollie(cSBr�den Inc. 1-33 channel system is currently inadequate to accom- modate the existing drainage area. The system is controlled by backwater from the Armand Bayou Sys- tem, and therefore, effective channel improvements to B112-00-00 would have to include improvements to Armand Bayou. Additionally, area residents appear to be opposed to major channel improvements that would allow for increased development activity in the immediate vicinity. Consequently, it is proposed that half of the upstream watershed (B112-02-00) be diverted to B109-00-00, which has adequate capacity to support increased drainage. Both HCFCD and area residents are apparently in favor of this solution. o Drainage System A104-07-00: This system is paral- lel to Southern Pacific's rail line as a roadside ditch draining the eastern half of La Porte's municipal airport and the undeveloped area south- east of the airport. Due to the extension of the area southeast of the airport and the limited capacity of the ditch to accommodate increased stormwater runoff from future development, it is proposed to construct a realigned channel. This channel is not considered part of the 5-year program but it may become a necessary improvement due to development pressure on the properties southeast of the airport. o Drainage System B106-00-00 (Big Island Slough): This drainage system consists primarily of an unlined channel which drains the major part of La Porte's western side. According to FEMA's latest studies, shallow flooding continues to be a problem in the developed area downstream of Spencer Highway* while this flooding problem does not affect the existing residences, it poses a burden on the thoroughfares that serve the area, which are not designed to handle the levels of water runoff under major storm conditions. In order to resolve this situation, the downstream portion of this channel from Spencer Highway to Fairmont Parkway is proposed to be lined with concrete. This improvement will resolve existing flooding problems in the downstream area and increase capacity to a sufficient extent upstream to accommodate the diversion from F101-00-00. TurnerColliei�SBraden Inc 1-34 o Drainage System A104-12-00: This drainage system consists of two channels which drain the majority of the area south and southwest of Little Cedar Bayou. This area is currently undeveloped and was severely restricted from development on the basis of FEMA's 1976 Flood Insurance Rate Maps. These maps have been preliminarily revised by FEMA, resulting in considerable changes in the defini- tion of areas impacted by the 100-year flood plain and floodway. As mentioned previously, the Utility Plan bases its recommendations on the preliminary findings of FEMA's revisions. Consequently, it is expected that the undeveloped areas in question will be available for development. Drainage improvements are recommended for this area in the form of a roadside channel parallel to 16th Street and the proposed extension of Wharton Weems, to be linked to A104-12-00 and improving the existing structure at SH 146, which would be under capacity when the area is fully developed. Additional improvements in the longer term may be required on A-104-12-00 and A104-12-01 but these probably will be dependent on future conditions downstream. Table 7 lists the proposed projects of the drainage component of the Utilities Plan. These projects are divided into two groups: projects with a high priority which are to be included in the 5-year capital improvement program and projects with a lower level of priority which are to be developed in later periods. 1.4.2 Potable Water Exhibit 11 depicts the proposed Potable Water System for La Porte. The proposed system and improvements recommenda- tions were developed by Turner Collie & Braden Inc. in the Feasibility Study for Long -Range Potable Water Supply prepared in 1983 for the La Porte Area Water Authority. It is recommended that the reader refer to this report for detailed information on Turner Collie(cSBraden Inc Ln M 4J C E J O 4 4 CT ro E 0 �Ha y m c m w mw o£ om OI 4 C m E a L 4 I4 4 4 N N ID Iy N n in Un In a a a a a o O 0 0 0 I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 o ao in o in Ln o� c co N v r M �r �r x o n N 1 N O C m N O I N N 1 O E 41 O > C O O C 4 ti c a O E cc m E V 4 O t H I d 4 o C U C £ w 1J lC C H C a V m o c c aro m •� >,.-I o o a > m N ..a ..a H C N O c 71 UI .•� Ic n C G 4 4 N ••+ G 4 m N N G y H 'O m m e > > C 7 m C L 'O U •+ .•+ m U N m U o A r a V U .-•I .-1 $4 rl tm N N N N t 7 N m m .-I 4 G c U 0 ,� y G c c r c r+ •� iJ R1 it m •+ 4 m •-+ m ma O a� U U N m U W 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o p1 O O O O O C r C N m E o 0 0 0 0 O O c C N I I 1 I I I I I 1 •.i �O m n N 0 O C O O O C C O C) 4 N C%4 •-1 r--I .-1 CN N o n a m rz x w m U c 1-36 La Porte's potable water system and components. The resulting improvement recommendations of the Water Supply Report continue to remain valid from the perspective of the current effort; however, the timing and development pace of the proposed improvements is subject to change. This change is principally a result of the variation in the population growth forecasts for La Porte in each of the two studies. The Water Supply Report forecasts a rela- tively slow population growth for La Porte of about 2.6 percent annually. This growth rate was based on regional models developed by the Houston -Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) and Rice Center. These models, while applicable, are general and tend not to focus on specific development conditions or opportunities of La Porte per se. The population growth model used in developing popula- tion projections for La Porte in this Comprehensive Plan was specifically tailored to the City's economic and social reality and potential. The resulting projected growth in population was 5.3 percent annually. In essence, this variation affects only the pace in which water system improvements are needed. Table 8 provides the necessary adjustments to the development schedule of the improvements proposed in the Water Supply Report to allow them to correspond to the growth schedule projected in the Comprehensive Plan. Table 9 lists the proposed projects of the water distribution component of the Utilities Plan in two groups: (1) projects with a high priority which are to be included in TurnerCollie(cf Braden Inc r M E 0 m m >a 0 a m 0 a- a' c o m m r S a N N 1 rn FI rn O �4 11 O >, c m e rn E 64 a vi a �- a c 0 y T N O ti m ra o n ri M Ul r C 7 N O CD L O m a O 0 a -a o �v U O rn d, m y m rn rn o p I I I a d w o m M. rn m ON a 0 C t 4 I a b o o c o Sri o c o o > 0 VJ 7 m %C r•1 N O U 0 L t! l J >r O m cn r cv G a N en v H O >. 41 JJ Z JJrn c0 41 roo eJ ..� yJ 6' m M m M O >r r� 0 >4 m 0� T o + a O a N C� 0� 0+ c 1J o U 0) •n iJ L ro c E m m m a, O c aE ~ wzF W 41 d E rn ro w 41 o+ w E•� 41 C7' C 0) U) a) w y 4J ma)a)w .a 41w4144 ro"" u w\w\ 3 a) e d q •.� \ O \ O O O JJ *H m M w aJ Or ON ML d"'1 0 a) C ON O(n O) N �•U�4 V ro r .N . �m 41 Ero1n qw Q 11) d' M d' r•I rl r-1 N 4J w i V F z V,41 w J w U) 7 U) tl) E w a.) 4J ?i U) U ft to Ca 0 rmi 4J a Ua � c411it rc UI O •� w H 41 y U iJ OH £ •'( 1J OH a) JJ w JJ (a a) w U c > d c d (0 4J P ro ro ww ro ,JC ro w� ro 'n U V >( L 11 N a) (ts 41 11 (1) .0 +J �C +J .,. (n d i a) 0 to � V N i 01 41)N U a) C� r y 41 to aJ a) >1 cc q o E (a ro a) C) aE ro Ez H ) >, 4J 0 F •, c o a w mice) NV •H *, N O • U) a) U)O4J C V U U U JJ a) t to y 7 .i �J .ti ww y m no w Ga U)(a OOa: Of w w w m d w a: w d ro ro m 1J VOPC Da U a) m i) 4J N ro Cl a) 4J U O G •i +) ro z 3 o E E Ea (Ea W fo 3 r+ a E(a O� wo > 6 (a (a •.a ..i 0 ro 'O %. ro •.( ro (a ro ..a ... a) 'O a q sJ 6. 4m) a) c U E *� eo w 0)O U E 7 N c m a w C to O 'C U) w ro ro a U) Ma O ro a a a) 10 n a a PC 6 G. 01 a) r w O O C 0) m t •� C w e E C t .0 U U O ko c t U U) o 0 > a a) ••+ U U C C a) x d' Ot o •.+ U C O O O) o (a w E H 'O > .-I C C ••+ •� +J N H C O H C •.+ 'O C O a) 0 O E m a 0 •+ .' 1 1 (a E O w-1 1 C O O ..( O jo w a 0 z a w (1) 1 1 O N > OC G (U I N 700 G a) U W C 4J%D 00 a)WWI :n E•, +J cO .r 0(nrn EH •( >,w N i-E H 7 ro w 7 r( i+ w i (a w a 3 C7 a a r "" U) a) w oa a) ma u V •N JJ W H r JJ O w G] E C w 0 H L w w a) U) d E4 a H a a 0 O w 1 ..I 0) a c0 w C JJ w w CO (a (arn aw ) a% o t� •.+ .0 •O G aJ a ro N a� O U a) 'O m E m i rn o O O a) a D C m U) G ,C m V) rn a ¢ to w- H 1-39 the 5-year capital improvement program, and (2) projects with a lower level of priority to be developed in later periods. It is recommended that at a later date La Porte study the necessary potable water system improvement requirements in detail after 1995 in accordance with the conditions existing at that time. Seventeen million dollars worth of improvements associated with the water supply component of the system are not included since these costs are associated with the La Porte Area Water Authority and the Authority is currently evaluating the possibility of changing water supply sources from groundwater to surface water. 1.4.3 Wastewater Collection and Treatment Exhibit 12 depicts the proposed wastewater collection and treatment system for La Porte. This plan is the subject of a separate report entitled La Porte Comprehensive Wastewater Collec- tion and Treatment Plan. It is recommended that the reader refer to this report for detailed information on the Wastewater Plan's development and characteristics. Table 10 of this report lists the proposed improve- ments of the wastewater collection and treatment plant in two groups: (1) projects with a high priority which are to be included in the 5-year capital improvement program, and (2) proj- ects with a lower level of priority to be developed in later periods. TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc 1-40 TABLE 10 - LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 5-YEAR PROGRAM - COLLECTION SYSTEM Item Size Quantity (In Project Name and Type Linear Feet) Fairmont Parkway 66" MRC 1,100 Interceptor Sewer 60" MRC 3,800 54" MRC 1,970 48" MRC 9,350 30" RCP 31700 24" RCP 2,600 21" RCP 350 18" RCP 500 12" DI FM 6,500 Siphons 5 each Big Island Slough 42" MRC 5,500 Trunk Sewer 16" DI FM 200 North 14th St. 30" RCP 2,800 Trunk Sewer 24" RCP 1,300 10" ABS 600 Central La Porte 15" ABS 900 Relief Sewers East La Porte Relief 36" RCP 11800 Sewers/Pump Stations 30" RCP 3,600 24" RCP 21500 12" DI FM 200 14" DI FM 200 3.0 mgd PS No. 1 1 each 4.0 mgd PS No. 2 1 each Bayshore Relief 18" RCP 3,400 Sewers TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc 1-41 TABLE 10 (COnt'd) 5-YEAR PROGRAM - TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION o Expansion to 4.2 mg d will include the following improvements to the existing plant: - Lift Station Headworks Aeration Basins Final Clarifiers Aerobic Digester Sludge Thickener Sludge Dewatering Return Sludge Pumping Chlorine Contact Basins Chlorination Facilities Blowers Plant Piping Electrical Plant Relief Sewer LONG-TERM PROGRAM - COLLECTION SYSTEM Item Size Quantity (In Project Name and Type Linear Feet) Spenwick/College View 18" RCP 1,700 Submain Sewers 15" ABS 21200 Big Island Slough 36" RCP 4,600 Trunk and Submain 30" RCP 2,lOQ Sewers 21" RCP 1,800 18" RCP 3,800 15" ABS 8,400 12" ABS 6,100 8" DI FM 400 East Fairmont Park 12" ABS 1,500 Submain Sewer 15" ABS 11500 TurnerCollie�Braden Inc. 1-42 TABLE 10 (COnt'd) LUNG -TERM PROGRAM - COLLECTION SYSTEM (Cont'd) Item Size Quantity (In Project Name and Type Linear Feet) Bay Area Blvd. Trunk 42" MRC 2,500 and Submain Sewers 36" RCP 2,500 30" RCP 3,700 24" RCP 2,100 18" RCP 6,500 15" ABS 71800 12" ABS 10,900 8" DI FM 1,100 14th St. Trunk 24" RCP 31100 Sewers 18" RCP 3,200 15" ABS 1,400 10" DI FM 1,500 2.2 mgd PS No. 7 1 each Central La Porte 15" RCP 3,800 Relief Sewer South La Porte 24" RCP 2,450 Submain Sewer 21" RCP 1,800 15" ABS 11400 8" DI FM 2,400 Siphon 1 each East La Porte 15" RCP 3,900 Submain Sewer LONG-TERM PRUGRAt1 - TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION First Phase Expansion to 7 mgd Second Phase Expansion to 10 mgd Notes: MRC - Monolithic Reinforced Concrete RCP - Reinforced Concrete Pipe DI FM - Ductile Iron Force Main ABS - Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Pipe PS - Pump Station mgd - millions of gallons daily TurnerCollie(cSBraden Inc 1-43 1.4.4 Power while the utility Plan does not address specifically the area of power transmission and supply, it provides the follow- ing general guidelines for La Porte regarding the expansion of the existing electrical and gas systems serving La Porte and its environs. a Additional major transmission lines should be limited to existing ROW, preferably to those rights -of -way bordering or within existing industrial areas. o Local distribution lines should remain within existing or proposed thoroughfare ROW. In the particular case of electrical distribution lines, wherever possible and especially in residential areas, they should be located underground. o Electrical substations and gas compression sta- tions should locate within proposed industrial areas or, when necessary, in neighborhood areas in an isolated landscaped locations It is recommended that the City coordinate closely with Houston Lighting & Power and Entex on all power expansion plans in order that the environmental quality of La Porte be protected. 1.5 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan The need to provide adequate recreational space and facili- ties in any community is generally a public priority. In a community such as La Porte focusing on high -quality residential development, this need becomes of critical importance. The Open Space and Pedestrian System component of the Master Plan is TurnerCollie(�Braden Inc. 1-44 dedicated to defining the necessary open space facilities and support systems to provide La Porte with: o an attractive, high -quality recreational environment that will support La Porte's future growth as a residential community and promote an overall sense of well -beings o a system of parks that will service the needs of La Porte's citizens on a neighborhood and Citywide basis. a major open space facilities that will generate regionwide attendance which will support local commercial activities. o a pedestrian circulation system that will facilitate easy and safe access to neighborhood and community parks and link La Porte's recreational system with the regionwide system. o the necessary number of recreational and sport facilities compatible with local recreational interest in order to: - encourage local attendance. maximize access and service& minimize delays and inconvenience. Exhibit 13 depicts the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan for La Porte when the City is fully developed. The plan includes: Open Space Facilities which are classified as: Neighborhood Parks - These open space areas are dedi- cated to intense recreational activity associated specifically with a neighborhood. Community Parks - These open space areas are multipur- pose recreational/amenity areas which include major sport facilities and may include covered facilities or pavilions. These areas are intended to serve a major portion of an urban area. - Regional Parks - These open space areas are multipur- pose recreational/amenity areas that typically include major sport and recreational facilities. These areas are designed to serve on a City and regionwide basis and are generally associated with areas of significant environmental quality. Turner Collie(SBraden Inc 1-45 o Pedestrian Circulation Facilities which are classified as: Trails - These are rights -of -way improved for the exclusive use of pedestrians, bicyclists, and in some segments for equestrians. Generally they fall within existing electrical, pipeline, drainage, and/or thor- oughfare rights -of -way. - Sidewalks - These are improved rights -of -way exclusively for pedestrian circulation. These rights -of -way gener- ally parallel existing or proposed thoroughfare ROW. o Pedestrian/Thoroughfare Intersections which are classified as: - Type 1 - These are walkway/trail intersections which cross thoroughfares which have been classified as high- ways or occur at key City intersections. These inter- sections include signage, ballards, surface materials, and paint treatment improvements on both the walkway/ trail and thoroughfare. - Type 2 - These are walkway/trail intersections which cross thoroughfares classified as primary arterials. These intersections include improvements similar to Type I intersections but to a lesser extent. - Type 3 - These are walkway/trail intersections which cross thoroughfares classified as secondary arterials. These intersections include signage, ballards, and paint treatment improvements on both the walkway/trail and thoroughfare. o Bay -front development project, which includes the develop- ment of a marina, support facilities, fishing pier, and backwater. Principal achievements of the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan are: The establishment of a continuous circuit of trails and walkways that link existing and proposed neighborhood, community, and regional parks with each other and all proposed activity areas of the City. These trails and walkways in their majority (85 percent) fall within existing ROW. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-46 o The location of parks adjacent to City activity areas in order to provide mutual attendance support. Over 90 percent of the area allotted to parks falls within currently under-utilized vacant land areas. o The linkage of La Porte's proposed trail system to the Bay Area Blvd. walkway and bikeway, which is a principal component of the regional trail system. o The location of neighborhood parks in direct relationship to and in the approximate center of future neighborhoods. a Definition of the types and numbers of recreation and sport facilities to be implemented within La Porte's parks. Table 11 defines the proposed open space, recreation, bay - front facilities, and pedestrian intersections to be developed in La Porte both in the 5-year program and in the long term. Tables in Appendix 3 define prototypical guidelines that were used as the basis for determining the proposed facilities. These guide- lines are derived from Recreation, Park, and Open Space Standards and Guidelines published by the National Recreation and Park Association. The open space and recreation facilities included within the 5-year program are considered priority projects. Specific descriptions follow. o Open Space Facilities - Little Cedar Bayou Regional Park - This proposed 50-acre park is located south of Little Cedar Bayou from the bay to the existing cemetery proximate to SH 146 is the project of highest priority within the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan. The park will not only serve to provide needed recreational facili- ties, but also will be a project with regional impact and draw. Facilities included within this project are: TurnerCollie(SSBradenlnc qo wW W9019W w W UU) N (ac�� N M O r i r i m�O 'i %O O O ui Ir co o in O Nvrmr O N O1 rl O O N S+ O H mN� I I �r=4 co �vN ru�� voice i LWi ai w w 44 roro O N ••+ ••+ N ri m N m o0 Cq o 1 � � If1 N r N � %O t!1 V O O i H co � a "4 N O 6 N Sa W CD im �Z a% 11 1 C4qwrin Rr 1 1 1 m l p�p a a a wwaJw w I {7 w N V iCOL 4 C it a cco oo � rn o0�+ 4 CD 1 oc000 0 cHn 0 ^� >+ O co r� I o .r-i � o O E rl fl] I r1 N N "9i4 47 G4 Z I I .•i I•-� 1 I I m N 1 d' 1 m in a za, U41 u C 1r� a C moo a 4J G my. LO m u a 2 U " m to o a r7 c� w c F3 1 y �VN7 y�pp� W+ m o�-pi `L �•i ,1�-iC�i c V 4J 4J m O C .NI 39 N Lam' L E� .Na U ri N m Q c: W ri •.� !T �0 'C N N Upl 8 C Wp .•+ C L4 w L N a gCZ f HL� QcOC Sc1)cc CH ES 1-48 1. One 50-meter pool with diving well. 2. One 40000-square-foot gym with two support pavilions. 3. Playground area. 4.• Four lighted baseball fields. 5. One concession stand and press box. 6. One multipurpose soccer/football field. 7. Six lighted tennis courts. 8. A parking area for 480 vehicles. 9. Three picnic sites. 10. 2.6 miles of 5-foot trails. 11. Utility extensions. 12. A 300-foot fishing pier. 13. Foot bridge crossing Little Cedar Bayou. 14. Bay overlook. Community Park - This 23-acre park is proposed to be located in the Lomax area adjacent to the existing neighborhood park on the corner of Lomax School Road and P Street. This park is intended to serve the needs of the western side of the City and to act as a counter- balance to Sylvan Beach Park. Recreational and sport facilities to be developed within the park are part of the Recreational Facilities listed in Table 11. Facilities which might be included within this park from the list are: 1. Two basketball courts. 2. Two tennis courts. 3. One football/soccer field. 4. Two softball fields. Future facilities to be included in the long term are: 1. Two additional basketball courts. 2. Two handball courts. 3. Four additional tennis courts. 4. Two baseball fields. 5. One swimming pool. Trails - A 2,500-foot segment of the trail system is proposed within the 5-year capital improvement program. This trail will link Sylvan Beach Park with the proposed Little Cedar Bayou Park. The trail ROW will be parallel to or within the existing ROW of Park Avenue. Trail improvements will include surface treatment for pedes- trian walkway and bikeway, planting, irrigation, and signage. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 1-49 Sidewalks - 15,000 feet of sidewalk.s, equivalent. uo approximately half of the total proposed sidewalk improvements, are to be developed on Broadway and Fairmont Parkway. The sidewalks on Broadway should be developed together with the proposed thoroughfare improvements on that street. The sidewalks on Fairmont Parkway should be on both sides of the street. Sidewalk improvements will include surface treatment and planting. Recreation Facilities - The current lack of recreational facilities was expressed in the citizen survey that was prepared as part of this Master Plan. The recreational facilities listed in Table 11 under the 5-year capital improvement program are -proposed to satisfy current and future 5-year need. Consequently, all the facilities listed on Table 11 are of a high priority. Special Projects - The proposed bay -front development project is included as a special project within the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan because of its recrea- tional nature. This project is proposed to be located in the western portion of Sylvan Beach Park. The bay - front project is considered a high -priority project and is part of the 5-year capital improvement program in its first phase, which consists of the construction of 200 slips and 1,000 feet of breakwater. The proposed bay - front development project includes: development of a 500-slip marina with the necessary support facilities, which include: Recreation pavilion with restaurant, reception, locker rooms, shops, and other typical support facilities. Dry dock, parking, and launching areas. Pool and outdoor amenities. The development of a 2,000-foot breakwater and fishing pier. The breakwater is fundamental to the marina's success since it provides the necessary basin for the marina's ships. The breakwater is composed of dredged clay and stone materials. Feasibility of the break- water is dependent on the approval of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In discussions with the Corps staff, it was determined that there is available money to fund a feasibility study. TurnerCollie(�SBtaden Inc 1-50 1.6 Community Facilities Plan A community's public service facilities are important not only because of the service function they perform but because these facilities help establish the quality -of -life standard of the community. This standard is important in maintaining and attracting future residents to the community. The City of La Porte and its citizens recognize the need to provide quality public service facilities as evidenced by La Porte's School District facilities and governmental facilities. Yet the growth that La Porte is projected to experience in the years to come will pose a major challenge in the area of community facilities and services provision to the City, its institutions, and residents. The Master Plan addresses this challenge in the Community Facilities Plan. This plan is intended to: o determine the public facilities required to adequately serve La Porte's future population, o define the appropriate development timing of proposed public facilities in accordance with demand, identify regional public services which may be attracted to La Porte in order to enhance the City's standard of living, o establish public facility locations which will add quality to the City's environment and increase the level of resi- dent accessibility to these services, and provide development guidelines that may be used as reference by the City for the implementation of public_ service facilities. Within this framework, the Community Facilities Plan is committed to sustaining throughout La Porte's development a high level of TurnerCollieC46raden lnc service to the City residents. classified as follows: 1-51 Community facilities have been Cultural - Includes those facilities which are designed to provide services related to the arts, music, and theater, as well as other miscellaneous special interests A an educational, social, economic, or political nature. These include theaters, museums, meeting halls, art galleries, auditoriums, and stadia. Educational - Includes those facilities which are designed to provide educational or related services contributing to the potential betterment of the indi- vidual. These include preschool, primary, secondary, and advanced educational institutions; technical and vocational schools; and libraries and information centers. Governmental - Includes those facilities which are designed to provide the services related to public administration. These include public airports, post offices, police and fire protection facilities, and administrative facilities such as city halls, court houses, and public agency offices. Health - Includes those facilities designed to provide the services related to public and individual health. These include clinics; hospitals, whether general or specialized; and related support services. Social - Includes those facilities designed to provide for welfare, rehabilitation, and special programs to segments of the general public on a needs basis. Recreational - Includes those facilities designed to provide a recreational service to the general public. Facilities classified as recreational have been described in detail in part 1.5 under the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan. Exhibit 14 illustrates the Community Facilities Plan, identifying specific facilities and their proposed location. The exhibit should be viewed together with Table 12, which lists the proposed facility projects. Tables in Appendix 4 establish the TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc. Ln En Ln�p 2 CO �-] N NNcO+1 rlC omv wmO mc] N co m S+ 4 rmio4 m oCD bi •�i Urol m[y ONom dLnN.0 I Iri roy NOO O CDUOto I ndOO O a N CD 00 m �i N co •-1 r1 CD Coal ILI) rl N N N '-I cc N M y C ?i �+ ?i a.� r.+ ?� ?� 7r � a.i s.� r.+ a.i y .i p ..� ..a •.i ..+ ..a O O O •� ..a ..a ..+ O O 4. •..� am i+ 4 U Ueaal raal Urama' U U •� ••+ •� Urml Urmq Urmq U ••+ ••+ U U U m ro a)U m roromrom mmmro mm mm m roro G 4d N W W W W WC �C�77 � C�pp LW W W w �C�qq C LW W Wall' O N N O N N N 031 X k N N N N X N N N z c c Cc: c m m m c c c c m o c c c w m m F O u y, • }a la X •• j C tC6 N U Z [r.ro L%. I --I N '-1 N r•1 N r-I .-1 '-I d' r-I r-I rl G] i O al m i a ro amJcacac� u 0) H c 7 O a) CD O Vy o CDgyjo�jO da)a) roodm. m ao $ m Q •.�•1 O m 0 0 0 0 m co (aE O N ro �tl Ott Ca] 7 W O O O Ln O 4' •rl •.� •.1 O •� •a •ti ••+ O a) cr C1 O .-1 O O Ln N .--I 14 14 W LnW '-I la $4 S.I i4 N i R Ln a° %a ro ro ro I mom m ro m� +� o a I �. a m •� •i F W Caro. I .-i .•� 1 ,--i ,--� I to I I I•-i I I m W xa ac' W c �, •�i E L 3 a) •s7 r4 c + p rmi�8 aE� y, ro c ro ym W U) uu N �p� a t� U G �c UUN) a Urol caw Sd 1+ V a) w L rl �"•.i pro m ,-� 7 j.ti C +J >+ N •pro+ .1 ro O cc 1+ VUi � C Ski 10 x E F a) U i 'C O VUCa7hx7.�-I>QV U W C+�. C7CN F� 1-53 guidelines used, when appropriate, in determining facility needs for the City. Principal accomplishments of the proposed Community Facili- ties Plan are: o The concentration of community facilities in locations that support the activity/neighborhood center concept expressed in the Master Plan. o The definition of specific viable locations for each of the facilities. The majority of the proposed locations fall within private vacant land or in areas where a mini- mum of properties would be impacted. o The establishment of a public facility hub within the City's principal activity centers (between SH 146 and Broadway on Fairmont Parkway) which will permit the concentration of the majority of the governmental and government -related facilities. This will provide public service, cultural, and social facilities in a single area, facilitating access and encouraging interaction between different areas of the City. o The identification of the demand for and potential for a health facility to be established in La Porte. a Coordination of La Porte's Independent School District needs within the Comprehensive Plan framework and pro- posed potential facility locations for these needs to be met within La Porte's city limits. Table 13 establishes community facility projects included �oithin the 5-year capital improvement program and those to be developed in the long term. It is important to note that: o No school facilities have been included within the capital improvement program since they are funded by the La Porte Independent School District. In conversations with representatives of the School District, indications were given to the consultant regarding facility require- ments (expressed in Table 12) and potential facility locations. On this latter point, it was mentioned that while the School District has and continues to act under TurnerCollie(�Braden Inc qw Ln I aIC.I 1O4 040 N pro. aJ 11) U4 $4 7 ao N 1J N Cr O N JJ N N c c I O 144 I ~ rn V E 0 ao rn c O E .ti S4 4J E UI N '•i aI 0 7 H c c a o a°6A4 N I 'C >mawi ^O N a) rn tia :3w rnEOeal i H aJ I~ C 7 a0 L N O� N JJ N O O C c �O aIw CDn V E O N c C 0 1+ a ,� 41 S N N ro •� d >+ C O U 1 ro U d U1 I sa m yJ C V a ro C >, .ti ro � •.� .I a1 7 U •.� ro 7 'C [z U W C O 0 CO N N '-I N rl M V'ON I M I I I I I I I W I N I I 1 1 I c m �+ E ro + ., s4 C 1+ a.I ro N N c O V c E N Cn aI +J c c U L N a O ro x N •.a C 4J LL f.+ ro� 7+J C o it ro m o 3 c roW+J >4 E cC U:E c a U 11 $4 U • a G >y L4 aI (1 a) •� •� 1. a.I 7 I.+ 14 > �Q a•+ O ,- •• O C 7 O C7 07 U1I Cn rl C .-1 I N N I .-I c O V1 N I O I Lr) s. m c ro U Iw In N m H a; 4J z U C W s � C •� a � c ro 7 H m u E a + C O d U fnU E E t� 1-55 the policy of maintaining new school facilities within La Porte city limits, in the future this may not be the case due to the difficulty of obtaining adequate sites. It is strongly recommended that the City coordinate with the School District these actions in accordance with the Master Plan, since these facilities will play a vital role in the establishment of the neighborhood activity centers. Health facilities have not been included within the capital improvement program since it was indicated that the City did not have the capability to establish its own health system. Nevertheless, the consultant team discussed La Porte's situation with a health management organization. In this discussion it was determined that La Porte was a viable location for a 100-bed hospital. The combination of various standards were used in this determination. Among them were the following: - The standard between population and the number of hospital beds. This standard is one bed per 1,000 population. - The age of the population, of which at least 70 percent should be between the ages of 20 and 60. - The median household income should be above 525,000 per year. - The market area must be of sufficient size to support the first -phase increment of a hospital, which is 60 beds. An additional requirement to meeting the above standards was the establishment of a strong public support program which would work closely with a health management organi- zation in developing the facility. Also, it was indicated that there is currently in Harris County an oversupply of beds and the State Health Authorities are not allowing increased beds in the County. This situation favors the use of a health management organization which can mobilize beds from one facility to another, eliminating complicated procedltires with state and county authorities to obtain permits for a new hospital facility. Furthermore, it was noted that all funding for land acquisition and facility construction would be absorbed by a health management organization. It is recommended that the City contact a health management organization on its preference and proceed to develop the necessary public support to develop a much needed health facility in La Porte. TurnerCollie OBradenlnc 1-56 o Airport improvements have not been included within the Community Facilities Plan. Improvements are yet to be determined by the La Porte Municipal Airport Master Plan consultants and may be incorporated later as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan report. 'o Community facility improvements of high priority within the 5-year capital improvement program are: Cultural Center - This proposed 20,000-square-foot facility is an outcome of the public opinion survey which indicated the need for such a facility. The con- cept is to develop a multipurpose auditorium/hall which can be used as a whole or in parts for (1) cultural and artistic public events, (2) public gatherings and conventions, (3) permanent or temporary museum space, and (4) local social and political events of importance. While the facility's funding necessarily would be the City's responsibility, operation and maintenance of such a facility could be guaranteed by fees generated by the public activities sponsored in the cultural center. Library Expansion - A 5,000-square-foot expansion of the existing public library is proposed. This facility is owned by the City and operated by Harris County. Additional space is required for it to operate effi- ciently to provide the necessary service to La Porte. City Hall Expansion - An additional 1,500 square feet of space is proposed for the City Hall. Currently needed office space and expansion capacity for the following 5 years will be accommodated within the proposed area. - Government Center - The first phase (12,000 square feet) of this 20,000-square-foot facility is proposed as part of the 5-year capital improvement program. This facility will house all the governmental agencies dispersed throughout La Porte utilizing office space. It is estimated that the City leases 6,000 square feet of space to public agencies. In addition, as La Porte continues to grow, it will attract additional county, state, and federal agencies requiring office space. It is expected that the City will be able to finance this facility from the revenues it will generate from the facilities lease. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-57 Public Works Department - Eight acres of additional land are required by the Public Works Department for open storage facilities, additional parking facilities, and future office and covered warehousing expansion. Social Services Center - The first phase (12,000 square feet) of this 20,000-square-foot facility is proposed in the 5-year capital improvement program. This facility will house the social programs that the City sponsors both currently and in the future. The proposed devel- opment of this facility results from two concurrent situations: An important portion of the space utilized by the social programs sponsored by the City is located in the Police Department facilities, approximately 5,000 square feet of space. There is an existing need to expand these facilities but there is no available space. The Police Department intends in the short term to expand its facilities by either building new facili- ties or expanding into the space occupied by public agencies and programs (approximately 12,000 square feet). After discussions with the City staff and the Compre- hensive Plan Steering Committee it was considered more appropriate to allow the Police Department to expand within its existing facility and develop the Social Services Center. 1.7 Residential Development Plan Adequate housing is one of the most important features of a growing urban area. The fact that one of the principal goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to enhance La Porte's attraction as a residential community makes the need to plan La Porte's future residential development with sensitivity to the environmental, social, and economic factors involved. TurnerCollie(�Braden Inc 1-58 Currently, housing in La Porte is dominated by single-family dwellings as is the majority of the southwestern area of the United States. But this trend is steadily changing. Economic factors such as high inflation, less relative purchasing power, and higher land values, and social factors --smaller families and changing family standards --are having an impact on the supply and demand of housing. The housing development tendency today is increasingly moving towards the development of smaller lots, smaller units, and higher densities. This tendency affects La Porte since the City enforces a zoning ordinance. A zoning ordinance specifically defines what areas may or may not be developed, the type of development that should occur, and in the case of residential development, at what densities housing should be developed. If the City of La Porte did not enforce a zoning ordinance, market forces alone would determine residential devel- opment patterns and densities in the area. Consequently, determining the density of residential devel- opment is a fundamental decision to the future of La Porte which the master Plan must address. In order to make this decision, it is important to recognize the implications, relationships, and effects of the density issue. These are listed below. o Density is a function of - economic factors which generally may be reduced to housing affordability and social factors which have an effect on the demand and supply of housing. TurnerCollieC4Braden lnc. 1-59 o Density determines lot sizes, utility requirements, the image of an area, and part of the tax base of a city. o Density impacts growth. A decision to allow high density residential development can stimulate rapid growth because the cost of housing can be held within the economic reach of a larger number of persons. Conversely, a low density decision causes the price of housing to increase due to higher land values per unit and limits the number of people who can afford housing in the area. existing residential development --particularly low density single-family residential areas because: high density increases traffic and the number of people using neighborhood services, high density encourages redensification of low density areas, and there is a general perception that high residential densities imply lower income housing and that these will disrupt neighborhood cohesiveness. The following position regarding residential density in La Porte was adopted by the Steering Committee. La Porte should continue to grow at a pace commensurate with its market potential and opportunities as described in Section 3.0 of this report. La Porte will continue to be primarily a single-family residential community. La Porte should remain competitive in the regional housing market. TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc 1-60 o The ultimate population of La Porte when Lite City reaches buildout should be in the range of 100,000 inhabitants. o Residential uses in the Land -Use Plan should allow for a broad variety of housing opportunities in order to pro- vide current and future residents with as much choice as possible. o The overall average residential density in La Porte will be limited initially to six dwelling units per gross residential acre. As the City grows and development trends continue to change, this density may vary to accommodate new market conditions. The flexibility to adjust density over time should characterize the Master Plan and the zoning ordinance and map. a Multifamily residential development, on average, should not exceed a density of 27 dwelling units per acre. o Maximum lot sizes in single-family 2-8 dwelling units per acre areas will continue to be 6,000 feet unless a distinct use is granted under the specific guidelines presented in the draft zoning ordinance (see Appendix 2). The Residential Development Plan interprets the above posi- tion in two elements: (1) the distribution of residential land uses as depicted in Exhibit 3 and discussed in paragraph 1.2.1, and (2) the specific relationships presented in Table 14 between population, number of households, and developable residential acreage which result in average residential densities. The combi- nation of these two elements results in the decision parameters indicated previously, yet allows flexibility for their future change. it is important to note from Table 14 that: o The average density at buildout for the City is expected to be approximately 7.5 dwelling units per acre, approxi- mately 25 percent higher than the initial proposed average density of 6 dwelling units per acre. This differential is designed to accommodate future changes in density restrictions yet maintaining an overall density figure that continues to support a single-family residential environment. TurnerCollieoBraden Inc TABLE 14 - L4 PORTB COMPREEiENSIVE PIAN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Residential Iand- Use Classifications Projected Existing Maxiiman Residential Land - Use Plan (At Total City Development) Single -Family Acreage 4,202 5,526 5,076 Households 71074 33,156 32,176 Population 21,230 80,570 78,188 Average Density/DU Acre 1.7 6 6.3 Multifamily Acreage 38 400 446 Households 1,026 8,696 9,624 Population 3,023 21,130 23,387 Average Density/DU Acre 27 21.7 21.6 Total Residential Acreage .4,240 51926 5,522 Total Population 24,253 101,700 101,576 Total Households 81100 41,852 41,800 Total Average Density/IxJ Acre(l) 1.9 7 7.5 2 to 8 IXT/Acre Acreage 3, 595 Households 16,180 Population 39,318 Average Density 4.5 DU/Acre 9 to 14 DU/Acre Acreage 1, 481 Households 15,996 Population 38,870 Average Density 10.8 DU/Acre 15 to 30 DU/Acre Acreage 446 Households 9,624 Population 23,387 Average Density 21.5 DU/Acre (1)DU Acre = Duelling unit per gross residential acre. TurnerCollie cif Braden lnc 1-62 a While the total overall density at City Duildout increases, average single-family residential remains at approximately the desired 6 dwelling units per acre density throughout the time frame considered. o Multifamily residential is approximately equal to the projected density and at full development will remain below the average proposed density of 27 DU acre. Projected total population targets are set at full City development by the Land -Use Plan, with slight differences in household and developed acreage numbers. o A wide variety of housing types will be available to residents in La Porte, given the land -use classifications of residential use. In general, 80 percent of the total units will be at full City development single-family residential and 20 percent multifamily residential. This relationship is similar to the existing relationship. 1.8 Beautification and Conservation Plan A beautifully landscaped, well -kept, and maintained city is a source of pride for its citizens and a major attraction to future residents. The need to establish an image of environmental quality is fundamental to a community that wishes to be character- ized as a residential community. The City of La Porte, like so many other cities, suffers from visual blight and its citizens, through the survey performed at the beginning of this effort, have strongly urged the need to beautify. Generally, beautification efforts are limited since funds are scarce and city governments must meet what appear to be more pressing needs. If it is to reach its objectives, La Porte cannot afford postponement of this need any longer. It must commit its resources to a concentrated effort of establishing a city identity TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-63 and image commensurate with its goals and objectives reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. The Beautification and Conservation Plan component of the Master Plan will propose a concerted group of projects that together will remedy this pressing need in the future. Specific plan objectives are to provide La Porte with: o Beautification of existing and proposed thoroughfares and thoroughfare intersections in accordance with the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. o Development of beautification and landmark improvement projects in selected areas where, because of increased activity, a high level environmental quality is required. o Definition of areas that, because of their natural beauty, should be conserved and upgraded in order to ensure these areas from deterioration. a Development of an identification system for the City that will permit people to be cognizant that they are in the City of La Porte. Planning principles that govern the Beautification and Conservation Plan and were adhered to during its development are: o Beautification intensity on thoroughfares and intersec- tions should be commensurate with the thoroughfares' and intersections' relative importance with respect to local travel patterns. Area beautification should increase intensity at activity centers in accordance with the Master Plan concept (part 1.1). o Beautification projects should establish an image conti- nuity which will help emphasize special landmark struc- tures to be located at principal activity areas. This image should differentiate La Porte from adjacent areas. Principal activity areas should be differentiated by the intensity and quality of improvements. o Signage projects will be specifically located at principal entry and exit points of the City both on the bay and thoroughfares. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-64 o Conservation areas should reinforce the improvements proposed in the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan (part 1.5). Exhibit 15 depicts the Beautification and Conservation Plan for La Porte when the City is fully developed. The plan includes: o Thoroughfare beautification classified by the intensity of proposed improvements and by the local function of the thoroughfare. Improvements typically include planting (trees and grass), irrigation, signage, and, where required, surface treatment. Class I thoroughfares include Spencer Highway, East and West Main streets, Broadway, and segments of SH 146 and Fairmont Parkway in the vicinity of the proposed major activity center of the City. These streets have defined thoroughfares as Class I because of their function as principal local collection and distribution streets. - Class II thoroughfares include SH 225, Fairmont Parkway, Underwood Street, Bay Area Blvd., and SH 146. These streets have been defined as Class II thoroughfares because of their function as principal entry and exit thoroughfares. Class III thoroughfares include all of the remaining thoroughfares that are defined within the Thoroughfare Plan and Park Boulevard. Thoroughfare intersection beautification classified by the relationship between the intensity of beautification of the thoroughfares that form the intersection. Typical improvements include planting, irrigation, signage, and surface treatment improvements together with special improvements designed for the handicapped. Type A - Includes intersections formed by two Class I thoroughfares. Type B - Includes intersections formed by a Class I and a Class II thoroughfare. Type C - Includes intersections formed by a Class I and a Class III thoroughfare. Type D - Includes intersections formed by two Class II thoroughfares. TurnerCollieC�SBraden Inc 1-65 - Type E - Includes intersections formed by a Class II and a Class III thoroughfare. Type F - Includes intersections formed by two Class III thoroughfares. o Activity area beautification classified by the importance and extension of the activity area. Typical improvements include planting, signage, surface treatment, and special landmark projects such as a fountain, plaza, architectural structure, or sculpture. - TyDe A Areas - A single Type A area has been proposed. This area is located in the proposed major activity center of the City between SH 146 and Park Blvd. and Little Cedar Bayou and H Street. - Type B Areas - Five Type B areas have been proposed. These are located at proposed activity centers at: the intersection of Underwood Street and Spencer Highway, on Farrington Blvd. between L and P streets, on the proposed Pipeline Road between L and P streets, on Main Street from SH 146 to the proposed trail intersection on East Main Street, and on Wharton Weems Road from 16th Street to Broadway. a Signage classified by the type and extent of proposed improvements and their location on thoroughfares or on the bay front. Type A signage includes an architectural structure, lighting, planting, and surface treatment improvements. The sigh's location will determine the type of structure and lighting. Type A locations are: on SH 225, SH 146, and Fairmont Parkway at the city limits, and on the bay's northern and southern ends coinciding with the city limits. TurnerCollie(�Braden Inc 1-66 Type B signage includes a standard sign; lighting, and planting. Type B locations include: L Street, Spencer Highway, Broadway, Harbours Cut Blvd., East Main Street, Park Blvda at the city limits, Underwood Street, Bay Area Blvd., and the proposed thoroughfare crossing the City's southern industrial area at the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) limitse on the bay at the mouths of the Little Cedar Bayou and Deer Creek. o Conservation areas including the total extension of Little Cedar Bayou and Deer Creek. . Table 15 lists the proposed beautification improvements to be developed in La Porte in the 5-year program and the long term. Improvements within the 5-year program are considered priorities, and specific project descriptions follow. o Thoroughfare beautification projects will concentrate in the quadrangle formed by West Main Street, Broadway down to Little Cedar Bayou, Fairmont Parkway, and SH 146. o Intersection beautification projects will occur at the intersections of Broadway and Main Street and Fairmont Parkway and Broadway. o Three signage projects are proposed at the City's limits; on SH 225, SH 146, and Fairmont Parkway. o A conservation improvement project of 5,000 feet is pro- posed along the northern banks of Little Cedar Bayou, complementing the proposed regional park along Little Cedar Bayou's southern banks. A principal observation regarding the Beautification and Conservation Plan is that, while the plan proposes projects that will certainly increase the environmental quality of La Porte, the City of La Porte and its citizens must commit themselves to TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc TABLE 15 - LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BEAUTIFICATION AND CONSERVATION PLAN - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Beautification Improvements Thoroughfares (in line ft.) Class I Class II Class III Intersections Type A Type B Type C Type D Type E Type F Activity Areas Type A Type B Signage Roadway ID Type A Type B Bay Front ID Type A Type B Conservation (in line ft.) Little Cedar Bayou Deer Creek 1-67 5-Year Long -Term Program Program Total 13,850 38,300 52,150 -- 83,850 83,850 -- 132,450 132,450 -- 3 3 -- 4 4 -- 2 2 8 8 -- 9 9 -- 1 5 5 3 1 4 9 9 5,000 17,200 17,200 -- 3,000 3,000 TurnerCollie(cSBr�den Inc 1-68 the maintenance.not only of the proposed projects but of all property within La Porte* only a purposeful public campaign to beautify and maintain the City will ultimately guarantee the Plan's success. 1.9 Safety Plan The safe habitation of a community's residents is a public priority. There is an inherent need to prepare against natural and man-made catastrophes in order to preserve human life, property, and natural resources. The City of La Porte and its citizens have in the past been affected by such catastrophes, the most recent one being Hurricane Alicia in 1983, and have required that the Comprehensive Plan address the issue. In order to do so, the Comprehensive Plan has established the following goal --La Porte should have the services and alternatives necessary to con- front emergency situations with a minimum of human and economic loss. Included within the Master Plan's components is the Safety Plan. The plan is intended to provide solutions to La Porte's pressing safety -related problems. Through the survey, it was indicated by La Porte's citizens that police and fire protection services were more than adequate. Nevertheless, given La Porte's expected future growth, these municipal services will expand their facility base in accordance with the recommendations of the TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-69 Community Facilities Plan (part.1.6). In this way, the level of response time to emergency situations requiring these services will be maintained within the standards that the citizens of La Porte feel are adequate. While the survey did not specifically address the issue of hurricanes, it was indicated by the general public, the City staff, and the Steering Committee in presentations and public meetings that La Porte should have a plan that would permit citizens to evacuate in an orderly fashion. Evacuation can take two forms --either to other areas of Harris County or to shelters within the City that would provide sufficient protection. Exhibit 16 depicts the proposed Safety Plan for La Porte when the City has fully developed. It is important to note that the plan depends on the solution of two existing bottlenecks --the first located at the interchange between SH 225 and SH 146 and the second at the grade separation between SH 146 and the Southern Pacific railroad track paralleling SH 225. The bottlenecks are caused by flooding at these two locations, since in both instances the thoroughfares are depressed. In conversations with SDHPT officials, it was indicated that, while the grade separation between the railroad and SH 146 had two stormwater pumps to alleviate flooding problems, the capacity of both pumps was insufficient to resolve the flooding problem under heavy rain conditions. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-70 Consequently, the first recommendation of this Safety Plan is that in recognition that SH 225 is the fastest and most e cient evacuation route of La Porte to higher and safer ground and that SH 146 is the principal connection serving La Porte to SH 225, the City of La Porte coordinate with the SDHPT the follow- ing actions: o Find an immediate interim solution that would provide evacuating traffic with a viable alternative to the SH 146 and SH 225 grade separations under emergency conditions. o In accordance with the recommendations of the proposed Thoroughfare Plan, improve the SH 225 and SH 146 interchange or rebuild it to meet current needs, - construct the SH 146 median lanes so that they cross over Southern Pacific's railroad tracks, and - complete the median lanes and grade separations of SH 225 and SH 146 within the shortest time frame possible, given available resources. Additional components of the Safety Plan as depicted in Exhibit 16 are described below. o Evacuation routes are classified as a function of thor- oughfare capacity, direction towards hiyher and safer ground, and continuity. - Primary evacuation routes include SH 225 and SH 146. - Secondary evacuation routes include L Street and Fairmont Parkway. Spencer Highway has been designated as an interim evacua- tion route while the bottlenecks of SH 225 and SH 146 are resolved in order to increase the system's overall capacity. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-71 a Collector routes are defined as the principal traffic collection streets into the primary, secondary, and/or interim evacuation routes. These include all of the proposed thoroughfares that conform with the Thoroughfare Plan (part 1.3), with the exception of Broadway Street. The City has been divided into three service areas. Each of the areas is served by either a primary or secondary evacuation route and a number of collector routes. These areas are: Area I - This area includes the older portion of La Porte which faces the bay front and the areas between SH 146 and the Southern Pacific railroad. Area II - This area includes the Fairmont Parkway area, which encompasses the areas between the Southern Pacific railroad and Underwood Street, and between the proposed L/H Street and Fairmont Parkway. Also included in this area are the newly annexed Municipal Utility Districts of Spenwick and College View. Area III - This area includes generally the Lomax area, which encompasses the areas between the Southern Pacific railroad and Underwood Street, and between SH 225 and the proposed L/H Street. o Public Shelters - These include existing and proposed public buildings which, because of their structural capacity and size, can house securely in an emergency situation those residents of La Porte who do not wish to evacuate the area. These buildings include schools, hospitals, community centers, and government buildings. Possible locations, existing or proposed, are shown on Exhibit 16 and their use should be coordinated with the appropriate entity. o Fire Stations - The existing and proposed locations of these facilities are shown as part of the Safety Plan and in accordance with the Community Facilities Plan (part 1.6). Table 16 compares the existing and estimated number of vehicles that would evacuate La Porte by each of the service areas defined with the existing and proposed thoroughfare capacity. The estimates on number of vehicles are based on existing and proposed TurnerCollie�cSBraden Inc N r O yJ O O O O 7.0 m � co qw WC m 0 0 0l o rt m •Ni v o v v rn41 CD ri r y V N O OI N y 1 ti O O rnfn O U ••C+ C C O O A Y N co m N O rl M1N3 .Nx V' to 0� N %0 •'I : to MV rl C H N N U •F4 mw CD to sj � A }7�7 M C NI kD H W 0 W H co 1r! N O Q m to m Ln tD 0 4+ a y r c n c t7T cooI o Z U O to M ~ O T ItD Ix00 ON p re) m N C m CD qW •yt 7 I 0% OI N �..] U: p 7 O 0� V' N W Ci [� � Q H H t•,r YYYY::: 1-73 population and household figures by a factor of 1:2 vehicles per household evacuating. The table assumes that 100 percent of La Porte's population would wish to evacuate under an emergency situation. Under this assumption, the following observations are worthy of note: a Under existing conditions collector street capacity and evacuation route capacity are adequate to accommodate the evacuation of La Porte's total population in approximately a half day. This assumes that: - the bottlenecks at SH 225 and SH 146 do not obstruct traffic because of flooding, evacuation is performed in orderly and organized fashion, traffic congestion closer to Houston does not cause bottlenecks on SH 225, Spencer Highway, and Fairmont Parkway, and - evacuating traffic from Baytown would use evacuation routes other than SH 225. These assumptions represent an ideal condition and it would be beyond the scope of the present study to esti- mate the level of impact on La Porte's evacuees if one of these assumptions were not to hold true. Also, it must be considered that not all of La Porte's inhabitants might be inclined to evacuate, leaving their homes and possessions. More importantly, what these assumptions signal is the need for the City of La Porte to promote in the short term: - the concept of a regional evacuation plan, - the need to realize the improvements previously pro- posed for SH 225 and SH 146. When the City is fully developed, given that all thorough- fare actions proposed in the Thoroughfare Plan have been implemented, the evacuation,of La Porte is more critical. TumerCollieC�SBraden Inc 1-74 While not all of La Porte's residents will evacuate under emergency conditions, it is assumed that population will increase in areas more proximate to Houston and new thor- oughfare construction and improvements will trail behind as is currently the case. Consequently, thoroughfare capacity in the future will become increasingly limited in relationship to population trends. This implies that La Porte will: necessarily have to depend on the use of public shelters as proposed in the Safety Plan, have an organized program for the evacuation of those wishing to do so and a care and assistance program for those citizens wishing to remain in La Porte. 1.10 Redevelopment_ The City of La Porte, like other cities, has areas that are in a deteriorated condition or in the process of deterioration. While in the case of La Porte these areas are limited, they have a negative effect on both surrounding areas and on the City's overall images it is a goal of the Comprehensive Plan to have these areas upgrade in quality. In order to achieve this goal, two options are available to the City of La Porte and its residents --the first is to recognize the need for redeveloping these areas, designating them as such and establishing specific capital programs and investment incen- tives designed to improve the area's condition; the second is to reshape the conditions in and surrounding these areas through the concerted effort of improvements proposed by the Master Plan for the City as a whole in order to create favorable conditions for their upgrading through traditional development processes. TurnerCollie�Btaden Inc 1-75 The basic difference between the two options is that under a redevelopment effort the City must commit public effort and economic resources specifically within the redevelopment area to improvements in the hope that these will succeed in reversing the existing trend and create the necessary environment for area improvement. Under the second option, resources and public effort are allocated to all areas of the City evenly and each of the Master Plan components establishes actions that will have positive impacts on the areas of concern. Ultimately, the sum of all these Citywide actions will create the necessary condi- tions for the ordinary development process to improve conditions in the specific area of concern. After discussing these concepts with the Steering Committee it was felt that the second option is the most viable for La Porte, given past failures of redevelopment programs elsewhere in the U.S., the City's economic resources, and the working tools which the Comprehensive Plan would leave to the City, which were felt to be sufficient to address the problem at this point. 1.11 Capital Improvement Program Table 17 summarizes the proposed Capital Improvement Proyram, indicating probable costs for each of the Master Plan components. The total probable cost of all the proposed Master Plan actions considered to be the responsibility of the City of La Porte is approximately $140 million. of this total, the actions TurnerCollie(SBraden lnc TABLE 17 - LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - PROBABLE COST SUMMARY Master Plan Components Thoroughfare Plan Utilities Plan Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan Community Facilities Plan Beautification and Conservation Plan TOTAL Capital Improvement Program $ 31,402,000 52,988,000 18,549,000 19,168,000 17,397,000 5139,504,000 1-76 TurnerCollie�Bracien Inc. 1-77 proposed in the Utility Plan represent approximately 38 percent, followed by those proposed in the Thoroughfare Plan (23 percent), the Community Facilities Plan (14 percent), the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan (13 percent), and the Beautification and Conservation Plan (12 percent). It is important to note that the bay -front development project represents 5 percent of total proposed expenditures and is included within the probable cost associated with the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan. Table 18 separates the probable costs associated with the 5-year proyram and the Capital Improvement Program, providing a more detailed breakdown of each of the Master Plan components. The 5-year program represents approximately 25 percent of the Capital Improvement Program. Of the improvements considered within the 5-year program; those corresponding to the Utilities Plan make up approximately 50 percent of the program, followed in importance only by those of the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan (20 percent) and those of the Community Facilities Plan (17 percent). Principal elements within the 5-year program arP: Wastewater collection and treatment improvements, which represent approximately 25 percent of t}ie program's total probable cost, Stormwater drainage improvements, which represent approximately 11 percent of the program's total probable cost, and Bay -front development improvements, which represent approximately 10 percent of the program's total probable cost. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc TABLE 18 - LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - PROBABLE COSTS FOR THE 5-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND THE LONG TERM (In Thousands of 1984 Dollars) _ Total Probable Cost Probable 5-Year Improvement Cost of Master Plan Components Program Improvenents Thoroughfare Plan ROW Acquisition S 144 $ 5,361 Surface Improvements 1,4ll 19,362 Curb and Gutter 460 5,519 Intersections 120 1,160 Subtotal $ 2,135 $ 31,402 Utilities Plan Stormwater Drainage S 4,557 S 11,883 Water Supply and Distribution 2,786 14,301 Wastewater Collection and Treatment 10,847 26,804 Subtotal $18,190 $ 52,988 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan open Space Facilities $ 2,830 $ 7,543 Recreational Facilities 294 3,756 Pedestrian Intersections - 250 Bay Front Development 4,000 71000 Subtotal S 7,124 $ 18,549 Community Facilities Plan Cultural S 1,925 S 1,925 Educational 425 1,519 Governmental 1,750 10,518 Social 2,000 51206 Subtotal S 6,100 $ 19,168 Beautification and Conservation Plan S 1538 $ 15,377 , Beautification Improvements 2,020 Conservation Improvements 500 Subtotal S 2,038 $ 17,397 TOTAL $35,587 $139,504 TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-79 of the improvements considered within the long term, those corresponding to the Utilities Plan represent the principal expenditure, totaling approximately 38 percent of the program's total -cost, followed by the improvements (22 percent) prepared in the Thoroughfare Plan. Principal improvements considered in the long term are: o wastewater collection and treatment improvements, which represent approximately 19 percent of total expenditures, a surface improvements element of the Thoroughfare Plan, which represents approximately 13 percent, o beautification improvements, which represent approximately 10 percent, and o water supply and distribution improvements, which also represent approximately 10 percent of total expenditures. It is important to note that in the short and long term basic services such as utilities and thoroughfares constitute the principal expenditure items. Tables in Appendix 5 provide the detailed probable cost breakdown for each of the Master Plan components included in the Capital Improvement. Program. All probable costs are in 1984 dollars and, unless specifically mentioned, include costs associ- ated with engineering or architectural fees. In addition, each of the tables is based on the corresponding proposed improvement table of each Master Plan component and is referenced as such. Detailed descriptions of the proposed action of each of the Master Plan components can be found in parts 1.1 through 1.10. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 1-80 1.12 Capital Financing Two tools are available to the City to implement the Master Plan; they are the ways and means that will help accomplish the goals and objectives set or by the citizens of La Porte in the Comprehensive Plan. These elements are: o the financial options that the City of La Porte has at its disposal to put into effect the proposals set forth in the Master Plan, and o zoning and subdivision controls which enforce the physical properties of the Master Plan. This part of the Comprehensive Plan presents and discusses the capital financing options available to the City of La Porte, while Volume II is completely dedicated to Zoning and Subdivision Controls. An analysis of the financing sources available to the City of La Porte was undertaken once the capital improvements required to implement the Master Plan were identified. The purpose of the analysis was to identify the financing options available over the first 5-year planning period identified in the Comprehensive Plan because financing options and conditions are likely to vary con- siderably over the long term. 1.12.1 Conventional Financing Techniques Cities use two principal sources of financing for capital improvement programs. These are general obligation bonds and revenue bonds. The following paragraphs discuss the use of the debt instruments and how they could be applied to the City of La Porte's needs. Turner Collie(cSBraden Inc. 1-81 o General Obligation Bonds - General obligation bonds represent an obligation by the City of La Porte to dedicate a portion of its ad valorem tax revenues to service this debt. Normally, general obligation bonds are used for facilities that do not generate revenue or generate only a small amount of revenue that would not be suffi- cient to cover the debt service. Examples of the types of facilities that would be developed with general obligation bonds include roads, parks, buildings, and beautification efforts. o Revenue Bonds - Revenue bonds represent an obli- gation on the part of the City of La Porte to dedicate income from user fees paid to the City. Normally, revenue bonds are used to finance water and sewer projects, where the citizenry pays a fixed rate and the City charges a small adminis- tration fee and the remainder of the revenues are used to pay off bonds. Revenue bonds also have been used to develop facilities that will stimulate economic growth. The industrial revenue bond program for the state of Texas allows a city to develop a facility and lease it to a private operator and utilize the lease income to service the debt. Among the types of facilities allowed under this program are recreation type facilities. 1.12.2 Funds Available from Conventional S Financing As was mentioned, revenue bonds and general obliga- tion bonds are two important financing tools for the City. In order to determine the amount of capital that could be raised from these two sources, analyses of the growth expected within the City and the revenues that would flow either from property tax or user fees were developed. These projections consider the fact that La Porte will grow at a rate of between 5 percent and 6 percent and the expected rate of inflation over the next 5 years will average approximately 5 percent per annum. The following TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc 1-82 paragraphs discuss the potential revenue available from each of these sources to finance the capital improvement program. o General Obligation Bonds - As the City of La Porte grows and its tax base expands, there will be the potential to issue general obligation bonds to finance some of the needed improvements. Given the expected growth rates of the City and more particularly the growth of its overall tax base, it is estimated that the City can issue up to $9.4 million of general obligation bonds over the next 5 years. Also, with the annexation of the unexpanded College View MUD, an additional $3 million of general obligation bonds have been assumed. Thus, there could be as much as $12.4 million of bonds available for the capital improvement program. a Revenue Bonds - An analysis of the growth in utility connections coupled with the current rate structure within the City indicates that approximately $8 million of revenue bonds could be issued to make improvements to the utility system. 1.12.3 Additional Sources of Financing In the past, many federal government sources were available for use in capital improvement programs. Currently, the only major program that exists is the Community Development Block Grant Program, in which the City of La Porte participates with Harris County in applying for funds. This source represents only a few hundred thousand dollars of revenues each year, and it is not likely that the City will receive substantial additional revenues in the future. Funds from state and county sources for roads and parks have been taken into consideration and the capital needed for these projects represent the amount La Porte would have to finance. TurnerCollie�cSBraden Inc. 1-83 Therefore, there exists a need to finance approxi- mately $16 million of improvements from other sources of revenue. The following paragraphs discuss various options available to the City. The State of Texas has recently passed a law permitting the formation of a tax increment financing district and the required constitu- tional amendment to implement the district. This law allows an area of the city to be designated as a tax increment financing district which permits assessed property values within that district to be frozen at current levels. Capital improvements are than made within the district and the resultant increase in property values generate additional tax revenues. The revenues generated by the increase in value above the frozen base are used to pay off the bonds issued for the capital improvements. This type of district is used normally to revitalize an area and would seem to be ideal for the bay front area and portions of old La Porte. The bonds issued by the tax increment financing district do not represent an obligation on the part of the City of La Porte and hence do not impact the overall debt capacity of the City in terms of general obligation bonds. Capital Recovery Another method available to the City consists of charging developers a capital recovery fee for each connection to the utility system. The reason for this fee is that new development normally requires a capital expenditure to provide additional services and, therefore, the development should bear the immediate cost associated with issuing bonds and providing the needed services. A capital recovery fee of between $500 to $1,000 could be expected to yield S2.9 million to $5.8 million for development of the utility plan. Industrial Revenue Bonds - Industrial revenue bonds within the State of Texas can be issued for any amount up to a maximum of $10 million. For example, commercial bay -front development could be financed by industrial revenue bonds TumerCollie(cSBraden lnc 1-84 and leased to an operator with the lease payments covering the obligation. In fact, the industrial revenue bond could be used in conjunction with the tax increment financing district described above. o Developer Provided Improvements - For certain improvements such as parks and trails, it could be possible for the City to require subdivision developers to make allocations of land and some improvements to provide parks and trails for the City in accordance with the Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan. The cost of these improvements along with the capital recovery cost described 'above would be borne ultimately by the purchaser of a new home in La Porte, who will be the beneficiary. 1.12.4 Potential Financing Plan for the Capital Improvement Program Some of the options described in the previous sec- tion require action either by the City Council or the citizenry for implementation. However, based upon an assumption that such approval would be forthcoming, the following financing program could be utilized. Table 19 shows the sources of funds that could be expected to accrue to the City of La Porte. Considering that the projects proposed under the Utilities Plan will be supported by revenue bonds and that the projects proposed in the Thoroughfare Plan and Community Facilities Plan are examples of projects that would have to be supported by general obligation bonds, the following scenario could develop. o The projects proposed in the Utilities Plan would be financed by S8 million in water and sewer revenue bonds, coupled with $5.8 million of additional revenue bonds issued on the basis Turner Collie�Braden Inc ate (1) N Y C Gl t�0 N O N �a U d 7 •. ..A .) a y a L n c C ro U - N •.% S4 ro N d C roic 3 "w 14.4a)0)4J0 aroc ? a o20 Im 4J aW4J(D a) i44) C N C 'i NJ� •� 'o U L N aci c E 8 n v�r3$ tWO¢+1 CD C) Her+ �Ln o far E mv)- o d yN J C C C C N ov°i Nro .d� AOs+ ip2ixNA •.-i GL � 3 � U •riir •a ��i .�i m w1-1 WE.m0 EE EE . > r m 00V4J O u rn .anN Nd L+ +1 +j a Qais N AsNNN vLr)r H Ln M O V N N N Ul G C U +J C u � Wro•a .., .0 i a m v d y0� i+ 0 G� w yo.� Vl C4 41 CL N ro v in g mm �cn m C 4� $U w m y 41 N N N •W tw L N 7 N H � '� UM3 �9 V ICV p C O O OE O O O E E ••O+ W ~ •� .~ � v � � r-+ o o� .1 m ai E tn E m E c o G 00 J rn c V N V) N fNN V1 V C C U Z •'C+ '�N2 J N N it'NOC C •.+ C � O V ••+ y 0 c$ m ro x > O w y U U•. i v t 2 U O 4 00) C H C N G i> c� > xc �> E.� +% ua F 1-86 of a capital recovery fee of S11000. These two sources, coupled with the $3 million of bonds issued by the College View MUD would yield a total of $16.8 million nearly sufficient to implement all projects considered in the Utili- ties Plan. Those projects of the Utilities Plan contained within the tax increment financ- ing district would be financed as part of the district yielding sufficient revenues to cover the total Utilities Plan for the next 5 years. o The bay -front development project consisting of the construction of a breakwater and marina on the bay could be financed by industrial revenue bonds. The success of utilizing this type of financing technique would be dependent upon receiving a favorable ruling from the IRS and finding an operator who would agree to lease the marina prior to the construction and issuing of the bonds. However, this should not be a major problem for if the marina is to be success- ful, it will be necessary to find a competent operator and reach agreement with him prior to the issuance of bonds. Within the tax increment financing district, it is anticipated that several of the capital improve- ments that might be financed by revenue bonds. could be financed by the district. Examples of this would be the utilities that are required within the district to service the district itself. Beautification along the bay front and any thoroughfares, trails, or sidewalks along with the utilities would be included in the tax increment financing district. It is estimated that approximately $8.0 million of improvements could be financed through the district. This would represent 15 percent of the current tax base of the City, which is the maximum by law that can be included. The anticipated growth of that base was a conservative 5 percent yielded $8.0 million. However, it should be recognized that the district must be created so that no more than 10 percent of the property value con- sists of residential property with five or less dwelling units. Thus, a careful analysis of how to delineate the district and the potential growth in assessed value could yield a higher or TurnerCollief�SBraden Inc 1-87 lower number than the $8.0 million. The consult- ing team estimates that between $4 and $5 million could be raised from this source. Facilities that are designed to benefit a wider area than the district covers are not subject to financing through a tax increment district. Hence, such community facilities as the library, government center, etce would not be included within the tax increment district's financing capabilities even though these facilities may be located within the district itself. The implementation of a tax increment financing district affects the availability of revenues available to support general obligation bonds in the future. However, since a maximum of 15 percent of the tax base can be included in the district, this would still leave approximately $9.0 million of general obligation bonds that could be issued. To summarize, the total amount of revenue available for the City over the 5-year period would amount to slightly over $34 million. Thus, the shortfall of revenues needed to implement. the 5-year plan would amount to only about $2 million. This could be made up through paying as you go for some of the improve- ments, through a small tax increase, or by postponing some of the projects beyond the 5-year period. The failure to implement either a tax increment financing district, a capital recovery fee, or the issuance of industrial revenue bonds would severely impact the ability of the City to finance the overall required capital improvements without a major tax increase. TurnerCollieU�Braden Inc t L.A PORTE COMP EHENSIVE 1L�AN �°� EziBT TumerCollie�SBraden Inc AlASSOCIATIONWITH L W F W INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN MILE �� • � \ /\� _ �' _ NORiH SCALE IN FEET �T LA . PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ®�� Ex3�T TumerColhe��Braclenlnc. �� .s=o���.,�� ,;,-� LVVFVV !f�lC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH S���E,„FEET 31T _ .. _ _ _ ., .., � � � n w i r H L Y Y I YY � �V V V � � I IV v Iv � � L �V 1 1 1 V. /-1 �J S O tl I /'l I � V NORTH SCALE IN FEET a..Al �J i a .- AN _ SAW AG NAI ANW WA, -- i ---: it WINDOW + Aw� WNW All -- ---A- --"--- ;ik — ! COMMERCIAL LAND USE tSAW . We COhUMERCIAL USE Al lm WA Al" AAAlll NSA A� j — ,�.,�'a All _ All EXHIBIT -----I�_'--- --- j L A RTE COMPREHENSIVE5 TumerCollienc N ASSOCIATION r.T„ LWFWI INC. VERNON G. HENRY & •ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET 4 _I I. - - LIC AND - ,--------------- ;--------IP OPEN SPACE USES IT �.. F I - ----.. --, !\ --- - ---_-------- ' / PUBLIC USES — — — — — — now OPEUSPACE IT 4 }'� p®RTE z TumerCollie G E HIBIT ��SBrad�n Inc. . s s o P �_ —= LWFiN INC. LA� VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATESNORTH SCALE ,N FEET - ' 1 N. IN Ne le NNI ago IN or —Im ''. as ;wt� No No - some - rise 'IN IN - eve Aw. or .v Normal Is �.NNN— _--� Ise No Hiplog ..__ - I _ -_ ...���...�........�..�....�F. �.w ...... .....�����. .161....e... imo&oat - , _� _ toot_ __ { _. _ .. — _ E i. - __ - �--_ _— am as __ - - I� -- NI L_ - a as - - -- - YW al IN - I as Is If Nos Nos 3 -- €INIllegal ! NIs-.rz IL Is No slN _ — — 3 a i " ' IN No Is, IN THOROUGHFARE PLAN IllegalT----_----- — _-- CONTROLLED ACCESS HIGHWAY Ile I F.I SEMI CONTROLLED ACCESS HIGHWAY 1. "l Ilflllllllllllll ARTERIAL `� SECONDARY ARTERIAL — rt I LOCAL COLLECTOR lot tsolvell Nor (( 3 i l_ - - _ £ i as a } _ I t LA PM1Its ® R T� EXHIBIT TumerCollie c Braden PRISOD 3000 Inc. �N ASNENSIVE � W ,H LWFW INC. VER PLAN 0 7 NON G. HENRY & AS nCIATES NORTH SCA,FIN«<, i I I - � god 10, get of get gfe eg ii C S Illilllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllll�I llllli6lllll -- - 4' All get IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIB IIf 1111111BBIB 11111111111 _ !Illuln — —_ gee wa 3 ..g�� 'AWS Reg -� ____ _ •` � HOBO FA ------------------;- --- - s - ;4 IMPLEMENTATION MAP IF THOROUGHFARES ___ ___ t Illilllillllllli TOBEWOENEDREQUIRING ADDITIONAL RGHTOFWAY _ I/ J r I I J "•"' TO BE WIDENED WITHIN EXISTING RIGHTOF WAY `I! I, I11 _ / IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII TO BE NEWLY ACQUIRED AND IMPROVED INTERSECTIONS TYPE 4 O TYPE 0 OTYPE G 2 G N _O TYPE B O TYPE E O TYPE H _ \\lnn\H_ .I Iv/Hill .\� O TVPEC O TYPE l = _ �1 1I GRADE SEPARATIONS TVPE, O TYPE O PE] ` - -� •'` PRIORITY PROJECT DESIGNATION_1 2 3 4 L� _ = .- _ COMPREHE ��� NSIVE EXHIBIT TumerCollie A B S D C I A T 1 0 N W , PLAN S "°° '°°° enlnc IN H LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET I- �NINIINNIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIININ �- - � �� - _ _ _ - . _ I 11F t! ` 11 `"llylll///1/lllllllJlllllll _ 11111111 Ul `S F I � I Ed _ 1 C �C PIN i CITY THOROUGHFARE - IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES pf THOROUGHFARES t = 4 mNIUNNIIII TO BEWIDENED REQUIRING ADDITIONAL RIGHT OP WAY TO BEWIDENED WITHIN EXISTING RIGHT OF -WAY TO BE NEWLY ACQUIRED AND IMPROVED �= = INTERSECTIONS o _ - j ,, .; - TYPE O TYPE O TYPE 1 • �Y / I - - - - li O TYPE B O TYPE E O TYPE H 1 O.TYPE C p TYPE E PRIORITY Paaecr DESIGNATION —1234 P 1 1 ti LA ORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 0 N26-m� 9 EXHIBIT TumerCollie Bradenlnc IN •BBGG,ATIO„ WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET i NORTN SCALE IN FEET fS IBIT D 1. ...... I AAA,,% .Pfs MAI ANON, IA I V^' f.` Qom`` ` -._ __ are iAAA, IA AAA Is T ^- - 1 i = - _ - - \ lAAAcm - - — I.IAM AIM . _ I J I -� To I — I 1 OR 1 -- OCR r a.. =r 116 ia = ms r l �LJAA 1 1 i1 — ' 1 4 1 it�-----� _AA _ _ I y _ 1 _r 1 i —---=;'-.— 'i — -- - �� 1 11 UTILITIES PLAN --,-- --------------------- _ - _ _ — ---- I ;� POTAEsLE — WATER SYSTEM JI Il _ Or EXISTING WATERLINE -- — A EXISTING PUMPING STATION — EXISTING ELEVATED STORAGE L LOW ` I{ I I --� ---� PROPOSED WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS (19A 19891 '- - - -- 1j L• PROPOSED WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS(1959 99.1 El PROPOSED PUMPING STATION 119SR-19591 L_---------_AAA— ----_ I { �.y LJ PROPOSED PUMPING STATION (1999-1S9C) --------1 •' O PROPOSED ELEVATED STORAGE (1SAI-1989I �` •(- \� PROPOSED GROUND STORAGE (1995—,991) ,1 \ LA► P®COM_ T RTE 0 EXHIBIT umerColhe c�Braden Inc PRE 1500 �°°° IN ASS 0C I A TI 0M W ENSIVEPLAN� ,H LWFW INC. VER NON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET �� 1 to am a, Ills. all ... .0. Sjk _ erat p.., i OF peto o — — 1 � ' r _�all lea 4 NJ I -- - : gas 1 4 ME 4 FEE eft a WI tee 40 Ills_ h i -- Else I (iMae93 vela, m a Felt — I ...' I ` < INOF Fell Lhe i ,- am LL I L ._. _I -� - .... �' L UTILITIES PLAN L alI I I s — ---'-,I II.r WASTEWATER a. :,. -------- -==-to ---be - W rl - COLLECTION AND lls 1 '' TREATMENT SYSTEM it i 1 i i W- I - 1 - i ` EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER %et_ ' FORCE M4 EXISTING F N _ _ _ _ — _ — I I _ I. goof— — --- — — — — —�'-- "� EXISTNG PUMP STATON I ,as � (" -------- ,.. I,. _ j a EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT rLgNr PROPOSED (SHORT TERM( GRAVITY SEWER PROPOSED (LONGTERM( GRAVITY SEWER PROPOSED [SHORTTERM) FORCE MAIN all,_ " PROPOSED (LONG-TERM) FORCE MAIN S ---- —_— -- �, PROPOSED PUMP STATION — — — — — I • PROPOSED TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION SEWER INVERT ELEVATION Fes— - - — 1 t-___•_•_ _ _ L A RTE®TPREHENSIVEEXHIBIT FLAN ®G ED 3��z TumerColliecBradenlnc IN ASSDGIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE INFEET f` -- L- x _r least do gel logged I loollosal loss loss 111414111 Idea I L! i ;I - 1; did -- ii �L .. _ '1141481 gal ---_ —' ----wc IOPEN SPACE t __ -- ------ ------ — AND PEDESTRIAN --7--'---- ;'` .,. —a SYSTEM PLAN domed . __.._. .__ — _._ S \� C� MBOflRODO PARK COMMUNITY / �------------- ,. ._^ .. PARK I'I REGIONAL PARK i TRAILS i —/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII PEDESTRIAN WALKIMAY1 -.l j PEDESTRIANS 1 — 1 —�11 OTYPEI 0TYPE2 0TYPE3 �--------�----------------', i �,1 _lsddll s LA R TE COMP RE: HEN B 500 DDCD EXHIBIT TumereCollie Bradenlnc IN ABS001AT10N ,NIT„ LWF W I NVERNON PLAN 0 13 C. P E R NON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET `rr � rr tivv, v Ct"SIVVIV la. P'"iClVti T µ � �+ O VIA I I_ S NORTH SCALE IN FEET 31T T NIF -Aess BAY - i = i - e s- NF dr— �IF . . + _ = — --- FA 1ANNN oIF p -- - E •,FN ,... ,,,• ,r, ,,,, .,.•, .. _ _ ��..� w Fit—{ E- r _� _ IN IN u.._— .—.—.'T .--._—.—_. i' _ - - - . � , - - __ I R Fact_ _ F ..: HIp I - -. I Fr I* FAA ' e.. , „ IF L_, . s r FAA . l ! s mg x INIF j — z �F — IF N. — 1 - 04 FF. FF- IT z:FF ; iiiii{ {{+i� iiii{i u�+ iiui{{+uu{u{{iiiu�{{ii{uiiii� /I r I I , oil IF e ----- - BEAUTIFICATION AND IF IF. ' NATION PLAN CONS ..� -� I Fact_ THOROUGHFARES ;`I ` * B- ._._ I i' [ :4 I T.` ••`•- TYPE I IF TYPE 11 1 �I ` ' IIloilo,,•.,•,.,.. TYPE & corvs rvT OnTYPE a p rYPE D O TYPE E — _ p TYPE R 0 TYPE D p TYPE P �\ I slDrvACE ' - —— Pt A•� — -- • —' — —— -- /-Ii .TY'P� E A �� TYPE R; SPEC VEMENT AREAS + «A PRIMARY ACTIVITY AREA REA SECONDARY ACTIVITY AREA EA -_ _ \ CONSERVATION AREASLA bo � EXHIBIT 15 HIBITR®��HENSIVE PLANOTurnerCollie Bden Inc IN ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON Go HENRY & ASSOCIATES r+nMTe ���� }:_�� ���� I Y gpq �6gj§ ' ri i' � (� �, t, �, � i� � 1' i i�f - r.: .. Ail 111 sir IL _4Z- _ - fi 4 O$Pl .;.4-11 l I I EtNS ITS DOOR Rf fl THE FUTURE —people can either wait until the future S t happens and react to whatever it brings, or they can open the door and meet the future with a plan pre- pared to help it become the future they want it to be. The people of La Porte have decided to meet their future with a plan — A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — to R • • help guide La Porte in achieving specific, predeter- mined development goals. These goals are based on an • ' analysis and evaluation of: LA PORTE'S DESIRES MAYOR AND COUNCIL _ LA PORTE'S OPPORTUNITIES. LA PORTE'S FINANCES Thus, this comprehensive plan can be divided into three sections .MASTER PLAN `fv1ARKET OPPORTUNITIES IMPLEMENTATION The preparation of the comprehensive plan itself repre- sents a six-month effort that has included the active participation of: LA PORTE'S LEADERS Virginia Cline, Mayor Norman L. Malone, LA PORTE'S CITY STAFF District 1 John D. car, Langley, LA PORTE'S CITIZENS District 2 Edward M. Matuszak, District The plan is the creation of LA PORTE'S MAYOR AND Deotis Gay, District 4 CITY COUNCIL who had the foresight to recognize the B. Don Skelton, need and see that the need was fulfilled. District 5 Linda westergren. The plan has been guided by the STEERING COM- District e Kevin Graves, MITTEE that has participated in each step of the At Large plan's progress, providing insight and guidance Lindsay Pfeiffer, At Large throughout. The plan is the result of the effort and capability of COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THE CITY STAFF who have worked hard to assure its STEERING COMMITTEE realistic results. Jahn R. Lloyd, Chairman Edward M. Matuszak The plan is in response to the advice and judgment of B. Don Skelton ' indsay Pfeiffer - the hundreds of LA PORTE CITIZENS who have taken Latimer JougJanet time and effort to respond to surveys and attend meet- S. CharlieS. Young ings, giving voice to their needs and desires. Because of those who have participated, giving their CITY MANAGER time and effort unselfishly, La Porte is ready for the lack Owen future. munities have matured, their growth has begun to decline, and it is now La Porte's time to grow. As a nat- ural extension of the Pasadena/Deer Park growth, the next twenty years will see La Porte go from a town of 25,000 persons to a city of over 75,000 persons. The City will have almost 100,000 persons when fully devel- oped around the year 2020. There is no question that La Porte will grow in the future, the question is HOW should La Porte grow in order to offer the highest qual- ity of life for its citizens. This MASTER PLAN illustrates what La Porte wants to achieve with its growth. An extensive survey of La Porte citizens, coupled with comments received at sev- eral public meetings, has been interpreted in a series of master planning goals: ENHANCE LA PORTE'S ATTRACTION AS A r�ESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. PRESERVE THE INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER OF EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. EMPHASIZE BEAUTIFICATION OF THE CITY. MANAGE GROWTH OF INDUSTRY WITHIN THE CITY. ENCOURAGE THE UNIFICATION OF LA PORTE, PROVIDE MORE PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES. La Porte's master plan responds to these goals. The master plan is designed to reflect the land use, residen- tial development, utilities, thoroughfares, community facilities, beautification, and open space required in La Porte if its goals are to be achieved. In addition to illustrating what La Porte WANTS TO ACHIEVE, this master plan reflects what La Porte CAN ACHIEVE. Limitations resulting from existing develop- ment, environmental conditions, topography, ownership patterns, and political jurisdictions are recognized. The reality imposed by La Porte's market opportunities and economic constraints are considered. The result is a master plan for development that CAN BE ACHIEVED. La Porte recognizes the opportunity is here to make this master plan a reflection of its future. La Porte is now ready to open the door to that future. IF R IF I MIF K �n order to assess future opportunities for the City of La Porte it is necessary; to understand the assets the City possesses `-La Porte's most significant assets are IF I IF I I IF IF LOCATION. La Porte's greatest asset is its location on Galveston Bay, La Porte is the closest point of access from Houston to the bay. The future will see continued growth in demand forrecreational activ- ity, and, La Porte is well located to capitalize on this opportunity. BARBOURS CUT - The presence of the Container IF Port at Barbours Cut offers unique market oppor- tunities'for La Porte. The continued growth of con- tainerized operations, coupled with the fact that this will be the container port serving most of Texas for the foreseeable future suggests that this facility will experience significant growth. INDUSTRY LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT - The Currently La Pc excellence of the La Porte School System will be a clusively of pet major factor in stimulating additional residential offers little in tl IF growth in La Porte. Its excellent schools give La the Farea, due Porte an effective advantage in attracting new tions and the tr ,dustry to the area. While La Porte .IF; tries over the next few years, a diversification of the TRANSPORTATION - In addition to the Port, the industrial base will be necessary to provide employ - existence of major state highways — State Highways ment opportunities and expand the City's tax base. 225 and 146 — and the availability of good rail ser- Therefore, the plan has identified the industry La Porte vice are additional important attractions for La must target to bring to the area. Types of industries La Porte. I Porte can expect to attract in the future include: VACANT LAND -Land availability at reasonable prices has already caused substantial development of new residences in the western portions of La Porte. Reasonable land prices will continue to attract developers, particularly as vacant land in sur- rounding communities is used. Some of the COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPOR- TUNITIES that are most likely for La Porte include: • Development of recreational opportunities along the bay. • Supporting services in conjunction with the Container Port at Barbours Cut. • Light manufacturing and assembly operations that utilize container shipping for exports to Europe and youth America. insportation and warehousing operations in sup- port of the Container Port. • Manufacturing operations utilizing the petrochemi- cals currently being produced near La Porte. • Export Manufacturing • Transportation Services • Warehousing ��'� WWII \ 1 j! S Sal 1� ct ` % j %i\ hrr' It t- '1 I ��' s. Z & r t (ti e `1` 1til 11 I ! y // MRS . . -- LAND USE Nall 41 a. a When NON. oped,.La Porte will exhibit the fol- lowing land usercharactenstics ower�ensity resMaenhal development located to orm the "aaaaanuraacleus for distin neighborhood com- plexes,'buffered from bonacompatible activity by higher derisity residential areas, parks, and selected public facilities • Public service facilities located to provide easy access to residents with central facilities concen- . trated along Fairmont Parkway between State High- way 146 and Broadway. • Industrial development following the two major rail corridors along State Highway 225 and west of State Highway 146.`,:., • Commercial development encouraged to concentrate in one of two commercial centers on the east and west sides of La Porte or along a corridor tying the two centers. THOROUGHFARES La Porte's thoroughfares are designed to give the City a transportation network unsurpassed in meeting cur- rent and future traffic demands. With its system of roads and thoroughfares, La Porte will be able to: • Facilitate a free flow of through traffic on State ighways 225 and 146 without disruption to local l affic flows. • Link La Porte with a system of high -capacity streets that provide efficient access to all City activity cen- ters, keeping residential streets free from through traffic. • Attract major traffic flows through La Porte's primary retail centers. • Divert truck traffic serving Barbours Cut from local streets and intersections. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The focus of La Porte is to become ahigh-quality resi- dential community with over 40,000 residential units when fully developed. Because of the relationship between home prices and density, the plan offers a variety of housing densities commensurate with income levels enjoyed by La Porte's citizens. Specifi- cally, La Porte's residential development is designed to: • Ensure neighborhood quality by buffering neighbor- hoods from noncompatible development. • Allow developers to offer homes that are affordable within projected financial conditions of the 1980s d '90s. ti 0-rovide for retail, recreational, and public service facilities in close proximity. • Retain La Porte's image as a family community. an aaN 1. man laa a— an COMMUNITY FACILITIES � La Porte will continue to offer its citizens and visitors a high level of public service facilities. La Porte's out- � standing school system will continue to set the stan- dard for excellence in the City, but additional emphasis will be placed on expanded health and cultural facili- ties. Social services and public safety also will expand to meet La Porte's growing needs. Example projects include: • Afull-service hospital • A cultural center with multipurpose auditorium/ . theater complex. •Asocial center to serve social and group activities serving youth, senior citizens, and other citizen groups. • Expanded fire and police facilities designed to offer quick response throughout La Porte. PARKS AND BEAUTIFICATION Making La Porte an attractive place to live and visit is a primary objective of its citizens. This plan places emphasis on City beautification in which the natural beauty of the bay and bayous can be developed and maintained in conjunction with additional parks and recreation facilities. Specifically,_ La Porte's beautifica- lion plan calls foc • A system of regional community, and neighborhood parks linked by bicycle and pedestrian trails to serve the City and its environs • Designation of major segments of the bayous of La Porte as conservation areas. • Development of a major bay -front public recreation facility. • Landscaping and signage of City entrances, special attractions, major thoroughfare and pedestrian inter- sections, and rights -of -way. UTILITIES Proper development of La Porte will not be curtailed by inadequate or insufficient�public utilities. Sufficient - water, sewer, drainage, and powefcapacities are plan- ned to adequately meet La Porte's future development needs in the most efficient and technically effective manner. The City of La Porte has the resources needed to upgrade and expand its utility systems to ensure: • The availability of potable water supply sufficient to meet future needs without unmanaged groundwater withdrawal. • Sewage collection and treatment capacity to meet all of La Porte's future sanitary sewer needs. • Outfall drainage facilities capable of eliminating the danger of flooding, even under severe conditions. I - 1- I I .._ II V Icl almrol - (E) Etlueeliml •Minn• F.umc.. t= r— CDNNUNITY FACILITIES I Ir wAFxrc pEPIrnKp XEunpxsxlPs eETxv>, arnvlrr CENIEXS. INDUSIXIGL. AXp RFSIDEMI4L LRNO p5E5. ----- ;t; � _, r„r . . i .... � - �... ,... ....:........� roll sr•.. _T. - - ! :�, -- r. __� _ i - P� PARK SYSTEM AND CITY BEAUTIFICATION. 1 - wnn+¢ penrnxp TXE TNOXOUGXIXX6 AXO XXEAa - 1b R XEFIfI1FlE0 IX XELtTIONAIIP Tp THE PXpPpSEO 'CI " PKXK �Xp IILIIL XY51EX FOX I.A PDXfE 1 �1 �:41 MRSUMMtEa�, i� x `te_ nma oafs of this comprehensive plan "as �� r5 j k 1 p t gzi€ 90 ,, u r 1 3 i s .ted by the citizens arela 4 t i xrq t.rENHANCELRTE SRAa ��LV RESIDENTIAL 5.11 CO U ITY Y,�t� K rfidz� -:; 5tR +_Hxf_N }"offa, - f L 3F E PRESERVE` E(NDIVIDUAL CHARACTER OF u ' EXISTf G EIGHBORHOODS f - a EhAPHASIZE'BEAUTIFICATION OF THE CITY. �A"4 � ti +XIMIZE-7HE POTENTIAL FOR NEW RETAIL DE.;14VELOPMENT .. LIMIT EXPANSION OF HEAVY INDUSTRY WITHIN THE CITY. , ENCOURAGE THE UNIFICATION OF LA PORTE, PROVIDE MORE�PARKS AND RECREATION Ir FACILITIES.' Most elements of this plan are established specifically S to meet these goals: • Good .Utility Service • Improved Drainage City Beautification • citywide Recreation • Major Park Projects • Social and Cultural Centers • Effective Zoning • Quality Housing Development •Improved Thoroughfares is Bayou Conservation • Bay -Front Development • Health Center • Retail Centers This is the comprehensive plan for La Porte's future. It is now the responsibility of the PEOPLE OF LA PORTE, with the help of enlightened leadership, to MAKE THE PLAN A REALITY. LA PORTE STANDS READY TO OPEN ITS DOOR TO THE FUTURE ... y- F uTURE TurnerCollie(Braden Inc. CITY OF LA PORTE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME 2 APRIL 27, 1984 /N ASSOC/AT/ON WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC. Neil E. Bishop, Ph.D., P.E. Project Director G McAlister, P.E. Senior Vice President CONSULTING ENGINEERS TEXAS .4USTIN DALLAS,EL P.450110USTON-PORT AR TN I�R COLORADO OEN�'LRCRAND (UNCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Turner Collie & Braden Inc. would like to thank all those individuals and organizations who through their cooperation and participation made it possible to prepare this Comprehensive Plan report. Special thanks to: - CITIZENS OF LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE, PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Bayshore National Rank Entex Inc. First City Rank Fred Buxton & Associates Harris County Houston Chamber of Commerce Houston -Galveston Regional Area Council Houston -Galveston Regional Transportation Study Houston Lighting & Power Company La Porte Chamber of Commerce La Porte Independent School District Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Port of Houston Authority Rice Center State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Southern Pacific Development Company Southern Pacific Transportation Company Texas Commerce Bank TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc. PARTICIPANTS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Project Director Dr: Neil E. Bishop, P.E. Project Manager William L. Metzger Capital Finance Charles V. Brophy Joseph M. Langan Computer Applications Michael L. Miller, P.E. E. Stan Watson Economics and P1arket Donald G. Reynolds Joseph M. Langan J. Hal Patton Environmental Michael J. Toohill Michael L. Miller, P.E. Graphics Allan W. Ritchie G. W. Straker Fernando De La Rosa Master Plan David G. Mayagoitia Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. Turner Collie & Araden Inc. TCB Data Systems Inc. LWE'W Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. T�irner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Rraden Inc. TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc. PARTICIPANTS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Cont'd) Stormwater Drainage Alan J. Potok, Pa Transportation Dr. Ronald W. Holder, P.E. Robert E. Sutton, P.E. Wastewater Min Chu, P.E. Donald R. Sarich water Frederick R. Bernsee, P.E. Shirley Webster Zoning Vernon G. Henry, AICP Mary Lou Henry, AICP Randall Walter, AICP TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Vernon Henry & Associates Vernon Henry & Associates Vernon Henry & Associates I a LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page VOLUME I INTRODUCTION Authorization Scope of Work SECTION 1.0 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-1 1.1 Master Plan 1-2 1.2 Land -Use Plan 1-5 1.3 Thoroughfare Plan 1-12 1.4 Utilities Plan 1-29 1.5 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan 1-43 1.6 Community Facilities Plan 1-50 1.7 Residential Development Plan 1-57 1.8 Beautification and Conservation Plan 1-62 1.9 Safety Plan 1-68 1.10 Redevelopment 1-74 1.11 Capital Improvement Program 1-75 1.12 Capital Financing 1-80 • VOLUME II SECTION 2.0 ZONING AND SUBDIVISION CONTROLS 2-1 2.1 Zoning 2.1 2.2 Subdivision Controls 2-12 APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Zoning Ordinance Draft - Zoning Map Appendix 2 - Subdivision Ordinance VOLUME III SECTION 3.0 MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3-1 3.1 Alternative Growth Strategies 3-2 3.2 Expected Population Growth 3.6 3.3 Projected Land -Use Allocation 3.7 3.4 Specific Growth Industries for La Porte 3-11 SECTION4.0 ENVIRONMENT 4.1 4.1 History 4-1 4.2 Economic Environment 4-2 4.3 Physical Environment 4-16 SECTION 5.0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 5-1 5.1 Environmental Analysis 5-1 5.2 Planning Issues and Alternatives 5-7 5.3 Final Development Approach 5-11 BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES Appendix 3 - Public Opinion Surveys and Interviews Appendix 4 - Recreational Facility Guidelines Appendix 5 - Community Facility Guidelines Appendix 6 - Capital Improvement Program Detail TurnerCollie(csBradenlnc. 1 A P P E N D 1 C E S SF,CTION 2.0 - ZONING AND SUBDIVISION CONTROLS 2-1 2.1 Zoning Zoning may be defined as a municipal means of logically con- trolling and directing the use and development of property for the common welfare by dividing such property into districts according to present and potential use of the property. It is essentially a means of assuring that the land uses of the community are properly situated in relation to one another; that adequate space is avail- able for each type of development; that density of development in each area is held at a level which can be properly served by such municipal facilities as streets, schools, parks, and public utilities; and that development is sufficiently "open" to permit light, air, and privacy for persons living and working within the City. A city is composed of many types of development which are closely interrelated and interdependent, one with another. With careful planning, this interrelationship may be beneficial, but without it, these types become intermixed and some may interfere with others. If there is no logical means for consistent commu- nity control of land use, there is no method of determining the future character of the environment which will so profoundly affect the success of any building venture. Too frequently zoning has been viewed as a negative or restrictive type of regulatory measure. Actually, zoning is a very positive measure. It is an important tool to help assure the sound and logical development of the community. Zoning is TurnerCollie(4Braden lnc. z-z primarily the practice of good housekeeping in the incorporated area and involves merely prescribing the proper location for all types of uses and keeping them in their proper location. 2.1.1 Intent and Legal Nature of Zoning Zoning is an exercise of the common police power as are all regulatory laws. This means that each regulation in the zoning ordinance must bear some reasonable and substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare if it is not to be found in violation of the "due process" clauses of the state and federal constitutions. Zoning, in general intent, is no different from such regulatory laws as traffic control, minimum building standards, or health protection ordinances. The characteristic feature of a zoning ordinance which distinguishes it from other police power laws is that its regulations differ from district to district rather than being uniform throughout the city. As a result, a given area might he restricted to single-family residential development; height limi- tations, minimum lot size requirements, and minimum yard require- ments for that area would be drawn up in terms of that type of development. In other areas, commercial and industrial develop- ment might be permitted and regulations for those areas would be keyed to that type of development. Building codes and sanitary regulations, on the other hand, usually apply equally to all Turner Collie(�SBraden Inc. 2-3 buildings of a given nature, regardless of where they may be situated within the city. This characteristic feature carries with it a special danger in that local legislative bodies may be tempted to use it to give arbitrary and discriminatory treatment to certain indi- vidual property owners. Recognizing this danger, the State Legislature and the courts have imposed certain restrictions on local legislative power. 2.1.2 The City of La Porte's Authority to Zone The power to zone, like all other regulatory powers, is derived from the State Legislat��re. Therefore, the City must he able to show that its zoning ordinance not only meets consti- tutional standards but also meets legislative standards set forth in the State Enabling Act, both as to substantive provisions and as to the procedures followed in its enactment and administration. The State of Texas, through the 40th Legislature in 1927, passed zoning enabling legislation patterned after the "Standard State Zoning Enabling Act," a model act prepared by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The courts have held that the Legis- lature, in passing this act, intended it to apply to all Texas cities. Therefore, in Texas all cities must follow its provisions in order to adopt a valid zoning ordinance. Article 1011a of the State Enabling Act provides this authority, and reads as follows: TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc 2-4 "For the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals, and for the protection and preservation of places and areas of historical and cultural importance and significance, or the general welfare of the community, the legislative body of cities and incorporated villages is hereby empowered to regulate and restrict the height, number of stores, and size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lot that may be occupied, the size of yards, courts, and other open spaces, the density of population, and the loca- tion and use of buildings, structures, and land for trade, industry, residence, or other purposes..." Article 1011b prescribes the method that must be used in establishing the various districts and the necessity for fortuity of reyulations within each particular district: "For any or all of said purposes the local leyislative body may divide the municipality into districts of such number, shape, and area as may be deemed best suited to carry out the purposes of this Act; and within such districts it may regu- late and restrict the erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, or use of buildings, structures, or land. All such regulations shall be uniform for each class.or kind of building throughout each district, but the regulations in one district may differ from those of other districts." Article 1011c clearly defines the factors and purposes that must be considered as a basis for the zoning regulations. This Article, in part, reads as follows: "Such regulations shall he made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks,. and other public requirements. Such regulations shall be made with reasonable considera- tion, among other things, to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout such municipality..." TurnerCollie(SBraden lnc 2-5 Of major —importance in the preceding article is the requirement that a zoning ordinance be adopted in accordance with a compre- hensive plan. This assures that possible adjustments based upon particular ownership of a given piece of property are minimized and that considerations of general welfare are emphasized. 2.1.3 Zoning as Related to the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan and resulting Plaster Plan for the City of La Porte takes into account the necessity for adequate streets, utilities, drainage, subdivision control, and community facilities. Zoning is the most important legal instrument and administrative method for effecting the Master Plan phases of the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan is a guide which suggests how various exist - my and proposed features such as roads, parks, institutions, industries, businesses, and residences should be related to each other, forming a general and overall pattern of future land use. All of these elements in some way involve existing or proposed uses of land in the community. Thus, the Master Plan forms an important phase of the Comprehensive Plan and should give direc- tion to zoning. The zoning map can be thought of as an immediate control of existing and potential development, but based upon the Comprehensive Plan, it is concerned with the future as well as the immediate. The future Master Plan is basically a statement of objectives and goals to be used as a guide by the municipality in making decisions as to future development. Zoning is a tool TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc. 2-6 by which these objectives can be met and achieved progressively as municipal needs or conditions require. Reasonable anuscontrol is essential, not only as a method for the City of La Porte to anticipate logically the needs for such things as schools, parks, streets, and public utilities, but also in order that the individual citizens who build the different parts of the City can proceed with confidence regarding the future land -use pattern. 2.1.4 Methods and Procedures Used in Developing a Zoning 2.1.4.1 Citizen Participation The single most important phase of imple- menting the Comprehensive Plan for the City of La Porte is through the zoning ordinance --the legal means of bringing the various land use elements of the plan into being. As important as the Plan itself may he, it does not affect each and every citizen as directly as the provisions of a zoning law. This is a widely recognized fact --one that is recognized even in the Zoning Enabling Act, which places the responsibility of drafting the provisions of the ordinance in the hands of an appointed citizen commission, the Zoning Commission. The Enabling Act also requires the Zoning Commission to hold public hearings on a proposed ordinance prior to writing a final report giving its recommendations to the City Council. No such requirements are made of the other elements of a comprehensive plan. TurnerCollie OBradenlnc. 2-� A thorough understanding of zoning and the reasons for having such a means of control are indispensable if the ordinance is to achieve any degree of success. Discussions - of the ordinance should be held with the greatest the possible cross-section of citizens to assure the reasonableness of the requirements and their suitability to the yowls of the City established by the Comprehensive Plan. 2.1.4.2 The Role of the Consultant The job of the planning and zoning consult- ant has of course been to recommend a preliminary ordinance, Appendix A, as a part of. this Comprehensive Plan. The preliminary ordinance forms a basis for study by the Commission which may, as a result of the public hearings, find that certain provisions of the ordinance text or map should be modified or changed to fit particular location situations or desires more closely. The Commission, assisted by its consultants and the City Attorney, can develop an ordinance which, when finally recommended to the City Council, will be fair, practical, legally sound, and reasonable from a planning standpoint. 2.1.4.3 Citv Council Upon receipt of the final report of the 7.oning Commission, the City Council is required by the Enabling Act to hold at least one public hearing. Article 1011d of the act establishes the requirement. The Council, as a result of its TurnerCollie�cf Braden lnc. 2-8 public hearing, may change or modify the ordinance and adopt its provisions as law. 2.1.4.4 Planning and zoning Commission Even though the City Council is the agency that must officially adopt zoning regulations, it must have appointed a Zoning Commission in order to avail itself of the powers conferred by the State Enabling Act. Article 1011f of the Enabling Act provides the basis for such a procedure and specifies the general duties of the Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission must hold public hearings and should announce the time and place for such hearings in a newspaper of general circulation in the area at least 15 days in advance. The hearings serve as a basis for determining public reaction to the proposed ordinance and it is hoped that many valuable suggestions and comments can be obtained from interested citizens. Irt order to obtain as much information as possible from interested citizens, the Commission may consider holding a series of workshops on various sections of the draft ordinance. These workshops may also he used by the Commission to thoroughly familiarize themselves and interested citizens with the details of the draft ordinance. 2.1.5 Administration and Enforcement of a Zoning Ordinance Often a community wishing to adopt a new zoning ordinance does not understand how zoning administration and TurnerCollie(�Braden Inc 2-9 enforcement should be accomplished. To be effective, a good zoning ordinance must be properly administered. Ill-advised granting of variances, laxity in applying regulations, and too frequent and spotty changes in the ordinance or map can quickly negate the intended effect of the best of zoning ordinances. The effectiveness of zoning administration will be improved by following simple rules. 2.1.5.1 Zoning Enforcement Officer The City of La Porte has designated the zoning enforcement officer as the person who is responsible for the enforcement of the building code. He is the one municipal officer who issues zoning permits and should be capable of detecting zoning violations without delay. He has no discretion in the matter of issuing permits; the construction contemplated either meets the requirements of the ordinance or it does not. If it does not comply, he must deny the permit and advise the applicant of his privilege to take the matter before the Zoning Board of Adjustment. As the City of La Porte continues to grow, the workload assigned to the building inspection and zoning enforcement officer will grow. It is important to understand that additional staff will be necessary in the future if adequate enforcement is to be maintained. Many ordinances have become ineffective due to inadequate enforcement. Turner Collie(SBraden Inc. z-l0 Establishment of a Zoning Board of Adjustme An element in the administration of zoning required by the State Enabling Act is the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The Board of Adjustment is not to be confused with the Zoning Commission mentioned earlier; they are two distinct bodies. Article 1011g of the Enabliny Act provides for the appointment of the Board. The purpose of the 5oard of Adjustment is to: o hear and decide appeals from the order of the administrative official in the enforcement of the ordinance, o hear and decide, upon the basis of the provisions of the ordinance, requests for special exceptions, and authorize variances from the strict application of the yard and area requirements of the ordinance where, because of some extraordinary physical condition of a specific piece of. property (such as insufficient width), the strict application of the ordinance would cause an undue hardship to the owner. The Board has no power to take any action which would be a detriment to the public welfare or which would substantially impair the intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance. A capable and conscientious Board can often clear up grievances or inequities and save the individual as well as the municipality the expense of litigation. The Board should take care not to grant, through sympathy, timidity, or a misunderstand- ing of its duties, so many exceptions or variances as to render the ordinance ineffective. The fact that an owner could realize TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc. a greater financial return by using his property contrary to zon- ing regulations is not sufficient reason for granting a variance. If, in time, the Board of Adjustment finds that the ordinance text or map is, in part, unnecessary, unworkable, or unreasonableI it should suggest_ that these conditions he changed rather than grant an excessive number of variances and exceptions. 2.1.7 Amendments The governing body is the only agency which can adopt a zoning ordinance or amend the ordinance after it is adopted. This is an important feature since only elected officials are so empowered. An amendment to the provisions of the ordinance text or the map can be instituted by the governing body itself or by an individual citizen. In either case, the matter should he referred to the original drafting agency --the Zoning Commission and the City Council must both hold a hearing on a proposed amendment and provide written notice of such amendment. If Council so desires, its required hearing may be combined with that of the Zoning Commission. Article 1011e of the Enabling Act governs amendments. This article guarantees to affected property owners that their desires will be heard a.nd taken into consideration before any amendment to the ordinance is made. TurnerCollie(csBraden lnc 2-12 2.1.8 Review At least once every 5 years and preferably every year, an existing ordinance should he carefully reviewed. This review should be comprehensive. Changing conditions should be taken into consideration and the ordinance modified where necessary to accom- modate existing and future requirements. 2.2 Subdivision Controls Subdivision, as applied to land planning, is the division of a tract of land into two or more smaller parcels usually for the purpose of selling the parcels to individuals for their use. The basic components of a subdivision are (1) the parcels or lots, which are intended for private use; (2) the public ways or streets, which give access to the individual parcels; and (3) the utilities easements, which provide the corridors necessary for utility service. Private development in the form of subdivisions is a funda- mental step in the process of community building. The control of such land subdivision is a logical and accepted function of the municipal government in the attainment of the following objectives. o Assertion of the Public Interest Land subdivision control is an assertion by the munici- pality of continuing public interest in additions to, or modifications of, the physical layout of the community. Each town pattern today expresses the sum total of past developments. The manner in which the subdivider plans TurnerCollie(�$Braden Inc 2-13 his development is a deciding factor in the community pattern. A well -planned subdivision results in a pleasant and convenient neighborhood. A poorly planned subdivision ' creates congestion and inconvenience. Land subdivision is of special public concern because it permanently molds the municipal pattern. Once raw land has been apportioned into streets, blocks, and lots and the plat has been recorded and the lots sold, the pattern is set and changing it is difficult if not impossible. For this reason, it is necessary that the City of La Porte control at least the quality and pattern of subdivisions within its jurisdiction if coordinated development is to take place. Fostering of Attractive and Convenient Development Land subdivision control has positive implications. It seeks to encourage economically sound, livable communities. People want to live in neighborhoods distinguished by pleasant homes in pleasant surroundings. They want home sites with adequate yard space, paved streets, and connec- tions to utilities; they want street systems that allow for local movement but eliminate through traffic; and they want convenient municipal service and shopping areas, with adequate parking at these places. Even the best of con- trols cannot in every case satisfy all of these desires, but the intelligent and vigorous enforcement of good sub- division design standards coupled with far-sighted zoning provisions make realization easier. while subdivision regulations are primarily designed to guide residential development, they are also important in guiding the development of commercial and industrial areas. They provide assurance of adequate access and the interrelationship of service and utility facilities. Zoning complements land subdivision control by assuring the harmonious location of the various uses --residential, commercial, and industrial. Zoning assures that adequate space for light, air, and privacy will be provided and that density of development in each area will be held at a level which can be properly served by municipal facili- ties and services. It also prescribes that adequate off-street parking space is provided for each type of use to prevent congestion in the streets. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc. A] 2.2.1 Discouraging Premature and Superfluous Platting The economic consequences of uncontrolled platting are apparent in many cities and towns. Past haphazard development has created disorderly conditions which cannot be corrected because of prohibitive costs. Unregulated platting can result in low quality subdivisions with built-in early obsolescence, persistent tax delinquency, and disproportionately increased cost of municipal services. Past experience encourages attempts to control future, premature, or substandard subdivision. Two methods are in current use: (1) requiring the subdivider to show the neces- sity or suitability of the proposed development; or (2) requiring the subdivider to install or guarantee the installation of the minimum required improvements. Though it is indirect, the latter method has been used successfully by most municipalities and is recommended in the draft ordinance, Appendix 2, in the form of a required performance bond or actual installation or improvements prior to recording of the final plat. 2.2.2 Creating a Par and Subdivider > Beneficial - Both Municipali Effective subdivision regulations must be more flexible than the rules laid down to control traffic, building, or land uses. They must allow for the early development of a work- ing relationship between the public officials and the subdivider, for persuasion is a more productive instrument of control than TurnerCollie(�Braden Inc 2-15 coercion. The discussion of informal sketch plans between developers and the City Engineer is encouraged, and official review of preliminary plans contributes to decisions that lead eventually to a better design, particularly because they are not arbitrary decisions. The purpose of suhdivision design is to create sites for building that achieve the best urban environment, that encourage stable financial investments, and that satisfy the requirements of modern urban living. To these objectives both subdividers and officials can readily subscribe. A development is a marketable commodity that must meet competition from other areas, both existing and future. Wise control is important to the developer, for the cost of raw land is rarely more than one -quarter of the total cost of the finished product. 2.2.3 Legal Basis for Control Subdivision regulations and requirements may be regarded by some subdividers as unwarranted interference with their right to develop their land to their maximum economic benefit. However, the "health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare" of the community as recognized by the police power must take precedence over the desire of an owner to maximize prof its. The power to control the subdivision of land, like all other regulatory powers, including the power to zone, is derived from the State Legislature. In Texas, enabling legislation has TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc. 2-16 been in effect for many years. The City of La Porte exercises this granted power through the enforcement of subdivision regula- tions by its Planning Commission. The basic requirements of the State Enabling Act are quite specific and apply to a.11 cities in Texas. .These are as follows: 1. That every owner of any tract of land who may subdivide it into two or more parts shall cause a plat to be made which shall accurately describe all of the subdivision. 2. That every such plat shall be filed and recorded in the office of the county clerk. 3. That it shall he unlawful for the county clerk to record such plat unless and until it shall have been approved by the Planning Commission. 4. That is shall he unlawful for the Gity to serve or connect such land with any public utilities such as water, sewers, lights, gas, etc., which may be operated by the City, unless and until the plat shall have been first approved by the Planning Commission. To the City of La Porte the importance of these provi- lions is obvious. The importance to the subdivider of having his plat placed on public record is simply that the sale of a lot is not legally acceptable unless the plat containing it has been recorded. The City of La Porte, through its Planning Commission, exercises control over the subdivision of land both within the corporate limits and the established extraterritorial jurisdic- tion. The grant of extraterritorial jurisdiction by the State TurnerCollie(46radenlnc 2-17 is important for it protects areas logical for annexation from developing in a substandard way and thus becoming liabilities rather than assets to the community. while it is true that subdivision reyulatiorts impose substantial controls over the development of land, the developer is afforded definite protection from the capricious action, or lack of action, by the controlling agency. The Planning Commis- sion must approve a plat submitted to it if the following condi- tions are met: 1. The plat conforms to the general plan of the City as it then exists. 2. The plat conforms to the general plan for the extension of the City and its elements. 3. The plat conforms to such rules and regulations governing land subdivision as have been adopted by the City through due process. The Planning Commission cannot prevent the recording of a plat by mere delay. If a plat is neither approved nor disapproved within 30 days of submission, the County Clerk is authorized to accept the plat for record. Good subdivision regulations, based upon a meaningful comprehensive plan, can be a legal basis for the accomplishment of the recommended future patterns. The subdivider commits him- self to dedicate the streets, utility easements, and other public facilities to serve the development. He must also make provisions for features of the comprehensive plan occurring within his property, such as major and secondary streets designed to serve TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc 2-18 the entire community. In the absence of subdivision controls, land along narrow existing highways and country roads is likely to be developed without providing the additional right-of-way called for in the Thoroughfare Plan. Under the draft ordinance, the developer must dedicate the right-of-way necessary to bring such facilities up to prescribed standards. Where a major thoroughfare or secondary street is presently nonexistent but called for in the Thoroughfare Plan, the developer through whose land the street is intended to pass must dedicate the full right- of -way width within his plat at the time of subdivision. 2.2.4 Design Considerations Good subdividing, whether for low- or for high-priced properties, is not simply a matter of blocking off an area into easily surveyed lots and streets and recording a plat. On the contrary, it involves the creation of real estate values not previously existing by means of layout that is economically sound, but which provides to the maximum degree those conditions which make for a pleasant and healthful living environment. The original cost, the stability of values, and the whole quality of living environment are affected by the layout design and the determination of how the land is to be used. 2.2.5 The Street System The street system is the framework of a subdivision and, as s�ich, it must be considered from several aspects: TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc. 2-19 2.2.5.1 Pattern The pattern of streets in a well -planned subdivision produces interesting groupings of homes. The disadvantages inherent in the standardized rectangular or "grid- iron" street pattern are numerous. Such a pattern is wasteful in that it imposes a greater paved area than is necessary to serve a residential community. It increases traffic hazards by making each street a through street. It cannot be adjusted to the irregularities of property configurations. However, the most apparent disadvantage is the creation of monotony --monotony of space and architectural effect, and the lack of neighborhood identity. 2.2.5.2 Relation to Thoroughfare Plan A major consideration in the development of a subdivision is its relationship to the Thoroughfare Plan of the City. A subdivider may have to dedicate additional land for the widening of existing major streets bordering or passing through As plat. He may have to build a portion of a major thoroughfare through his land, or he may have to reserve land for the future building of a projected major thoroughfare. This admittedly results in higher costs for the developer but it is necessary for the community in the implementation of a good thoroughfare system. The developer can make the installation of the major thoroughfare a sales tool by emphasizing increased accessibility to employment and business centers. TurnerCollie(cSBraden lnc 2-20 There will be instances when the initial traffic load on a new major thoroughfare will be relatively light and will not seem to warrant the broad paving section required. However, it should be kept in mind that a new thoroughfare is designed for the load of more complete development and that it is most economical to provide the necessary right-of-way and pavement in the initial development. Increasing the size of both later through condemnation proceedings is costly and troublesome for the community, and is sometimes impossible. 2.2.5.3 Relation to Streets in Neighboring Developments A certain degree of secondary circulation + between neighboring developments should be provided apart from the major thoroughfares. While it is not necessary or desirable for all streets to be continuous from subdivision to subdivision, there should be reasonable linkage. Subdivisions abutting undeveloped acreage should provide street extensions, or stubs, to the bordering acreage to enable future street continuances and to assure future developments of adequate circulation to the major thoroughfares. A one -foot reserve at the subdivision boundary across the stub street right-of-way should be retained by the City to ensure the proper street extension into the adjoining property at the time of development. The one -foot reserve prevents the owner of the adjacent property from blocking the street extension with a building by denying him access across the reserve until the Turner Collie(cSBraden Inc. 2-21 street extension has been properly platted. The reserve automati- cally reverts to right-of-way at that time. 2.2.6 Administration of the Subdivision ordinance Subdivision regulations, like all municipal codes and ordinances, are only as good as their administration. The strict and impartial application of the regulations recommended in the following section will result in attractive, economical, and con- venient commercial, industrial, and residential neighborhoods if intelligently used by developers. Under the ordinance, when the City accepts the subdivision and the streets and utilities in it, it will be assuming the responsibility for maintenance of an asset rather than a liability. The process by which raw land is transformed into a subdivision under the draft ordinance is outlined below. 1. Subdivider informally discusses proposed develop- ment with City Engineer. While this step is not a specific requirement of the ordinance, it is an advisable step to ensure compliance with the basic requirements and to arrive at a coordinated plat layout. 2. Subdivider submits preliminary plat or general plan. A preliminary plan, letter of submittal, title certificate, and submittal fee must be given to the Planning and Zoning Commission at least 10 days prior to the meeting at which it will be considered. In order to ensure the appropriate development of an overall area, the preliminary plant, or general plan should encompass all the land under one contiguous ownership intended for future development. Smaller sections may be submitted for final approval, as desired by the developer. This will allow good overall control of the development, yet will not require the developer to put it on the tax roll and make TurnerCollie(46radenlnc. 2-22 improvements to any more land than he expects to have a market for in any one period. 3. Review of the preliminary plat or general oy the city Engineer, uuring the lu nays following the submittal of the plat and prior to the Commission's formal meeting, the City Engineer reviews the preliminary plat and other submitted material. When the Commission meets, the City Engineer should be prepared to present any omissions or inadequacies of the plat to the Commission for its consideration. This time period, allowing technical review of the plat, is particularly important in Texas where action by the Commission, which may meet only once a month, is required within 30 days of submission date. Without this provision, a plat submitted the night before a Commission meeting could not be acted upon the following day, nor could it be acted on within the statutory time limitation at the following meeting. 4. Review of the nreliminary plat or oeneral plan oy the commission. me Planning ann coning Commission reviews the application, preliminary plat, and the City Engineer's report. The plat can be approved, disapproved, or approved condi- tionally. The Commission will then notify the subdivider in writing, within 30 days of the action, stating the reasons for disapproval, the conditions to be met for approval, or simply that the plat has been approved or submitted. Submission of the final plat by the subdivider. Assuming approval or conditional approval, the subdivider may then submit a final plat of all the land shown on the preliminary plat, or a section thereof_, to the Commission 10 days prior to its next scheduled meeting, together with tax certificates and the submittal fee. Prior to submittal, the developer is required to stake the boundary of the plat on the ground. The plat is again reviewed and checked by the City Engineer. 6. Submission of construction plans to the City Engineer. The subdivider must submit complete and detailed construction plans and specifica- tions for the installation of all street and TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc 2-23 utility improvements to be installed. These plans must be approved by the City Engineer before the plat can be approved and filed for record. The developer may file a performance bond equal to the estimated costs of improve- ments, which guarantees the completion of such improvements, or he may actually construct the improvements after final conditional approval but prior to filing for record. 7. Review of the final plat by the Commission. The Commission reviews the final plat from all stand- points and informs the subdivider of its action, as before. The plat is recorded with the County Clerk. Unce all the requirements of the ordinance have been met, the plat is ready for recording with the County Clerk. After recording, the Commission must be furnished a reproducible copy of the plat bearing the signature of the County Clerk or his deputy. TurnerCollie(�SBraden Inc TurnerCollie cD Biaclen Inc CITY OF LA PORTE LA PORTE COMMIFHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME 3 APRiL 27, 1994 !N ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & AS5OC:IATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS iE%AS AUSTINIOALIASIEL PASOIHOUSTON/PORT AR'i HUR COLORADO DENVERlGRAND JUNCTION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Turner Collie & Braden Inc. would like to thank individuals and organizations who through their participation made it possible to prepare this Plan report. Special thanks to: CITIZENS OF LA PURTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Bayshore National Bank Entex Inc. First City Bank Fred Buxton & Associates Harris County Houston Chamber of Commerce Houston -Galveston Regional Area Council Houston -Galveston Regional Transportation Study Houston Lighting & Power Company La Porte Chamber of Commerce La Porte Independent School District Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Port of Houston Authority Rice Center all those cooperation and Comprehensive State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Southern Pacific Development Company Southern Pacific Transportation Company Texas Commerce Bank TurnerCollie c�Bracienlnc PARTICIPANTS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Project Director Dr. Neil E. Bishop, P.E. Proiect Manager William L. Metzger Capital Finance Charles V. Brophy Joseph M. Langan Computer Applications Michael L. Miller, P.E. E. Stan Watson Economics and Market Donald G. Reynolds Joseph M. Langan J. Hal Patton Environmental Michael J. Toohill Michael L. Miller, P.E. Graphics Allan W. Ritchie G. W. Straker Fernando DeLaRosa Master Plan David G. Mayagoitia TurnerCollie(cSBr�den Inc Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. TCB Data Systems Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. LWFW Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. PARTICIPANTS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Cont'd) Stormwater Drainage Alan J. Potok, P.E. Transportation Dr. Ronald W. Holder, P.E. Robert E. Sutton, P.E. Wastewater Min Chu, P.E. Donald R. Sarich Water t Frederick R. eernsee, P.E. Shirley Webster Zoning Vernon G. Henry, AICP Mary Lou Henry, AICP Randall Walter, AICP TumerCollie�Braden Inc Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Vernon Henry & Associates Vernon Henry & Associates Vernon Henry & Associates LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page VOLUMEI INTRODUCTION i Authorization i Scope of Work SECTION 1.0 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-1 1.1 Master Plan 1.2 1.2 Lando Use Plan 1.5 1.3 Thoroughfare Plan 1-12 1.4 Utilities Plan 1.29 1.5 Open Space and Pedestrian System Plan 143 1.6 Community Facilities Plan 1-50 1.7 Residential Development Plan 1-57 1.8 Beautification and Conservation Plan 1.62 1.9 Safety Plan 1-68 1.10 Redevelopment 1-74 1.11 Capital Improvement Program 1-75 1.12 Capital Financing 1.80 VOLUMEII SECTION 2.0 ZONING AND SUBDIVISION CONTROLS 00000000 2-1 2.1 Zoning 2.1 2.2 Subdivision Controls 2-12 APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Zoning Ordinance Draft - Zoning Map Appendix 2 - Subdivision Ordinance • VOLUME III SECTION 3.0 MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3-1 3.1 Alternative Growth Strategies 3.2 3.2 Expected Population Growth 3-6 3.3 Projected Land -Use Allocation 3.7 3.4 Specific Growth Industries for La Porte 3-11 SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENT 41 4.1 History 4.1 4.2 Economic Environment 42 4.3 Physical Environment 416 SECTION 5.0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 5.1 S.1 Environmental Analysis 5.1 5.2 Planning Issues and Alternative 5.7 5.3 Final Development Approach Be11 BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES Appendix 3 we Public Opinion Surveys and Interviews Appendix 4 - Recreational Facility Guidelines Appendix 5 - Community Facilities Guidelines Appendix 6 - Capital Improvement Program Detail Tumer Collie�Braden Inc LIST OF TABLES AND EXHIBITS Title Page TABLES Table 20 Population Projections 3-8 Table 21 Projected Land -Use Demand 3-10 Table 22 Waterfront Development 3-16 Table 23 Land Use in La Porte 3-20 Table 24 Population 3-23 Table 25 Manufacturing and Retail Position of Selected Cities 3-25 Table 26 Consumption Patterns 3-30 Table 27 Plastics Production 3-33 Table 28 Port -Related Services 3-36 Table 29 Registered Boats in Harris County 3-38 Table 30 Industrial Growth Potential 3-41 Table 31 Fastest Growing Export Industries 3-43 Table 32 Historical Population Growth 4-4 Table 33 Income per Household 4-6 Table 34 Manufacturers 4-7 Table 35 Employment by Industry Sector 4-9 Table 36 Employment by Occupation 4-11 Table 37 Housing Units 4-12 Table 38 Climate - Average Temperatures and Total Precipitation 4-17 Table 39 Environment - Soils 4-20 Table 40 Transportation -'Existing Thoroughfares Summary 4-26 TumerCollie�Braden Inc LIST OF TABLES AND EXHIBITS (Cont'd) Title TABLES (Cont'd) Table 41 Transportation - Existing Thoroughfares Table 42 Existing Land Use Table 43 Planning Issues - Opinion Poll EXHIBITS Exhibit 17 Land -Use Demand Exhibit 18 Future Industrial Growth Exhibit 19 Jurisdictional Limits Exhibit 20 Topography Exhibit 21 Regional Geology Exhibit 22 General Soils Exhibit 23 La Porte Soils Exhibit 24 Water Level Decline in the Chicot Aquifer 1970-1974 Exhibit 25 Water Level Changes in the Chicot Aquifer 1977-1983 Exhibit 26 Water Level Decline in the Evangeline Aquifer 1970-1974 Exhibit 27 Water Level Changes in the Evangeline Aquifer 1977-1983 Exhibit 28 Land Surface Subsidence (1906-1978) Exhibit 29 Flood Plain Map Exhibit 30 Vegetational Areas Exhibit 31 Areas of Generalized State Concern Exhibit 32 Areas of Particular State Concern TurnerCollie�cSBncien Inc 5-9 LIST OF TABLES AND EXHIBITS (Cont'd) le Page EXHIBITS (Cont'd) Exhibit 33 Thoroughfare Rights -of -Way and Traffic Map Exhibit 34 Existing Land Use Exhibit 35 Existing Housing and Population Density Exhibit 36 Existing Wastewater System Exhibit 37 Existing Water Supply System Exhibit 38 Existing Stormwater Drainage System Exhibit 39 Existing Electrical Distribution System and Pipelines Exhibit 40 Property Ownership Distribution Exhibit 41 Resistance -to -Change Map Exhibit 42 Development Obstacles Exhibit 43 Alternative Concepts/Plan 1 Exhibit 44 Alternative Concepts/Plan 2 Exhibit 45 Final Development Approach TumerCollie�Braden Inc E yI O N 3.0 MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3. 1 Alternative Growth Strategies 3.2 Expected Population Growth 3.3 Projected Land-Use Allocation 3.4 Specific Growth Industries for La Porte SECTION 3.0 - MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3-1 In preparing the Comprehensive Plan for the City of La Porte, it was necessary to understand the growth options that exist for the City and determine the wishesofthe citizenry with regard to future growth. Once these options were defined and a derived growth plan selected, a land -use mix was developed to encourage the particular growth scenario. For example, if the City wishes to be a bedroom community, then the Master Plan would reflect a maximum of single-family residential and a minimum of industrial land. In order to develop the growth options for La Porte, the following activities had to be undertaken. A thorough understanding of the current economic base and its prospects for the future was required. This is due to the fact that normally most economies are expansions of existing industrial bases with the concomitant growth of supporting industries. The results of this investigation are contained in part 4.2. o The next activity consisted of understanding the overall regional economy. The direction of the growth of the Houston area economy could provide opportunities for the diversification of the La Porte economy and would undoubtedly impact the overall economy of the area. a It was necessary to understand the unique assets that the City of La Porte possessed and attempt to match those assets.with the needs of particular industrial groups. o An evaluation of the competitive position of La Porte versus other communities in the area was undertaken. o Finally, once these growth options had been defined it was necessary to match these with the expectations of the citizens of La Porte as expressed in the survey taken at the beginning of the planning effort. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 3-2 The following sections present the results of each of these activities and their projected effect on the land -use mix was used as a principal basis in developing the Master Plan. ,. 3.1 Alternative Growth Strategies Three alternative growth strategies were presented to the Review Committee to evaluate. The following sections contain a discussion of each of the various alternatives along with the recommended economic development strategy for the City. 3.1.1 Continuation of Existing Situation If La Porte takes no action to channel its economic growth in the future, in all likelihood the following situation will exist. The petrochemical industry will remain virtually stagnant and over a 10- to 15-year time period will begin to decline as new, more efficient petrochemical plants are located in other areas of the country or the world. The container port at Barbours Cut will dominate the northern sections of the City and there will be a growth of warehousing and trucking -related services. Because much of the land along the bay front is in the hands of individual owners and the lots are relatively small, it is unlikely that any bay -front development will take place unless priority is given to the promotion and enhancement of Sylvan Beach Park. Thus, one would expect to see most of the boating recreation industry to continue to go to the Clear Lake area. Finally, the City itself. would become more of a bedroom TumerCollie c�Bradenlnc 3-3 community, with most industry locating either in Bayport or the extraterritorial jurisdictions to the north, which would have an adverse impact upon the overall revenues for the City and the capability of the City to provide services to its citizenry. 3.1.2 Maximize Tax Revenue Another potential economic strategy is to maximize the tax revenues available to the City to allow for the development of City services. In order to bring this alternative about, the City would have to engage in an active economic development program to attract new industry to the area. Since industry pays a greater portion of the tax load as compared to a similar -size residential development, the effort to maximize taxes is essentially one of maximizing the amount of industry in the area. Also, in order to maximize the revenue, that industry would have to be within the city limits, as opposed to being in the extraterritorial juris- diction or industrial districts. This alternative also would not distinguish between heavy or light industry and would actively seek any industry that could utilize the assets of the area. The advantages of this type of strategy, in addition to maximizing the city tax revenues, results from the creation of additional employment opportunities for the citizens of La Porte. However, there is still a good deal of industrial land available in the area, particularly with Bayport to the south and the Battleground industrial district to the north, and the likelihood of this strategy succeeding is minimal. Also, the citizens of La Porte TumerCollie c�$Bracienlnc 3-4 have expressed the desire to see less heavy industry within the 3.1.3 Limited Economic Growth A third alternative is a compromise position between the two alternatives mentioned above. This approach would encourage additional employment within La Porte from its present level to a situation where approximately half the labor force of La Porte would be employed within the City. The City would seek light manufacturing in nonpolluting industries to move to the City and help to expand the tax base. This alternative would also seek to control the growth of the warehousing and container operations and limit them to the northern sections of the City and its extraterritorial jurisdictions. This alternative also would allow for the maximum amount of retail that the City could reasonably expect to support. Thus, this alternative would seek to strike a balance between the needs for an expanding tax base and the desires to maintain a quality of life for the citizenry. 3.1.4 Recommended Strategy La Porte is in the unique position of being situated in a growth corridor that is just beginning to affect the City. while the growth rates of Pasadena and Deer Park are declining, La Porte's growth rate is increasing. No matter what La Porte does in the future, it is sure to see significant growth over the next 15 to 20 years. The abundance of vacant residential land and the affordability of housing in the City are sure to be TumerCollie c�Bradenlnc 3-5 a strong attraction for many year to come. The problem for La Porte is to balance this residential growth with sufficient industry to produce tax revenue that will support the types of City services that the citizenry desires. Thus, the economic development strategy for La Porte should be one�of containing and directing the future growth of the City for the betterment of all concerned. Also, the industrial tax revenue from the petro- chemical complex is certain to decline eventually and it is important for La Porte to have alternative sources of revenue available in the long term. Therefore, in keeping with the wishes A the citizens and recognizing the need to generate additional tax revenues, the following economic development strategy was adopted. o La Porte should encourage the location of port - related industries such as trucking and warehous- ing in the extraterritorial jurisdiction area and north of SH 225 and close to Barbours Cut. o La Porte should actively encourage the development along the bay front to take advantage of the future growth in recreation expenditures. This effort may involve tax incentives, land acquisition, or the funding of the development of a marina along the bay front. o La Porte should seek out light manufacturing indus- tries that could utilize the container facilities at Barbours Cut for export. Such industries would be of an assembly nature and the items that would require the security of being locked in a container located along SH 146 within the city limits of La Porte in order to receive the maximum tax benefits. TumerCollie�Bradenlnc The economic impact of these new industries upon the City of La Porte will not be as great as the existing petro- chemical complex. Therefore, it is important to have an ongoing economic development effort to find a variety of firms to move into the area. it will take several firms to replace one major petrochemical complex•in terms of the economic impact upon the City of La Porte. 3.2 Expected Population Growth The expected population growth of the -City of La Porte will be influenced by several factors. o First, the availability of employment opportunities will serve as an attraction for new residents. In all likeli- hood the opportunities for La Porte in the future will be numerous, and the emphasis should be on selecting the most advantageous industries for the area. o The second factor that will influence population growth in the future is the availability of vacant land and reasonable housing. As has already been noted, La Porte is one of the last areas with reasonably priced land along the growth corridor of the ship channel. It is projected that La Porte will continue to grow at a high rate due to this availability of land and housing. o The third factor that will influence the growth of. La Porte is the density of housing that is allowed per acre in both single-family and multifamily residential. Since there is a limited amount of available land, the number of dwelling units per acre will ultimately set the population of La Porte when all of the land is absorbed. o The fourth factor that will influence population growth within La Porte is the overall trend in the nation toward lower household sizes. The current household size in the City of La Porte is 3.12 persons per household. Over time this is expected to decline and fall below 2.5 people per household as La Porte approaches buildout. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 3-7 o Finally, the interest rate on home mortgages will have a significant effect on the growth rate. Should the interest rate fall, La Porte should expect a higher growth rate than it would otherwise experiences it appears currently that interest rates will remain fairly stable over the next few years. Through an analysis of the above factors, it was determined that La Porte will probably grow at an annual rate of approxi- mately 5.3 percent per year over the next 20 years. Table 20 shows the various population figures in 5-year intervals until the City reaches what is expected to be the time when it is fully developed. 3.3 Projected Land -Use Allocation Ultimately, all demand for various land uses within the :City of La Porte will be caused by industrial expansion and employment growth. Whether this expansion is inside or outside of the City, it still impacts the overall demand for various types of land uses. Exhibit 17 shows the interrelationship between this expan- Sion or employment growth and the various land uses. Economists know that one of the best predictors of population growth is the number of jobs that are available within the area. As employment grows, population will be drawn to the area, and hence a demand for residential land will be created. Likewise, the growth of employment provides additional dollars to fuel retail sales which creates a demand for commercial land. Also, the initial industrial expansion and employment growth creates a demand for industrial land. in each of these cases, there are accepted TurnerCollie c�Br�denlnc 3-8 TABLE 20 - POPULATION PROJECTIONS Year Population Increase 1984 24,253 7,116 1989 31,369 9,203 1994 40,572 11,903 1999 52,475 15,396 2004 67,871 TumerCollie�Braden Inc 3-9 development ratios of now many square feet per employee is required and the maximum amount of square footage that will be allowed on an acre. By utilizing these known ratios, it is possible to develop the overall demand for both commercial and industrial land. Also, by setting an acceptable density per acre in terms of dwelling units, and given the trends in household sizes, it is possible to determine demand for residential land within the City. Given this model of land -use demand coupled with the desires of the citizens of La Porte, the current land within the city limits was allocated over time. The basic underlying assumptions were that the citizens desired additional light manufacturing in the area, that there was a desire for the maximum of retail within the City, and that the current density per acre for residential land would be maintained. Table 21 shows the expected land -use demand over the next 35 years until La Porte is fully developed. As can be seen from the table, the bulk of the land use has been projected to be in single-family residential. Over 51500 acres are projected to be dedicated to single-family residential and approximately 300 acres to be devoted to multifamily. The commer- cial retail uses are projected to amount to almost 500 acres, most of which are expected to be in the form of strip shopping centers scattered throughout the City. Because of the overall projected population of the City when the City is fully developed and the TurnerCollie�cSBraden Inc 3-10 TABLE 21 - PROJECTED LAND -USE DEMAND* Residential Single- Multi- _ .. Commercial Year Family Family Retail Industrial 1984 2,299 38 185 346 1989 2,810 57 202 361 1994 3,264 84 235 391 1999 31899 122 281 433 2004 4,754 173 343 489 Buildout 51526 293 494 625 *See Table 1 for actual land use allocated. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc lack.of drawing power from surrounding areas, it is not likely that a regional mall can be built in the City of La Porte. Finally, in keeping with the desire to have some industry within.the city limits, 625 acres ultimately will be allocated for industrial uses. 3.4 Specific Growth Industries for La Porte 3.4.1 Future Growth of the Houston Area In order to assess future growth opportunities for the areawide economy, interviews were conducted with those viduals in the economic development community knowledgable and influential in the future economic growth of the area. These individuals included economic development experts with the Houston Chamber of Commerce, economists with the local banks, and planning directors, most notably those with the Port of Houston Authority. The results of these interviews indicated that there was no con- certed effort being undertaken to diversify the Houston economy and that in all likelihood the economy would be dependent upon the oil and energy industry in the future. Among the areas of potential growth were the following. 3.4.1.1 Port -Related Activities The concensus by economic development experts was that the Port of Houston would rebound from its current depressed state to be a significant factor in the Houston economy. In particular, the container port at Harbours Cut would continue TurnerCollie�Bracien Inc 3-12 to grow and would be the receiving point for most incoming con- tainers to the Port of Houston. One of the main advantages cited with the Barbours Cut terminals was the fact that ships did not need to navigate the ship channel to the turning basin at the port and therefore could get in and out more quickly at Barbours Cut. Thus, substantial growth is projected for the container facility at Barbours Cut over the next 10-15 years. 3.4.1.2 Energy Industry The outlook for the energy industry in the Houston area is primarily as an administrative center. The current concentration of petrochemical plants is not likely to grow significantly due to environmental considerations and the fact that many of the new plants are being located elsewhere. Because of the importance of this particular industry to both La Porte and the Houston area, the strategic planning director for a major U.S, chemical company that has facilities in the La Porte area was also interviewed. His opinion coincided with that of the economic development experts. 3.4.1.3 Medical Center Another significant factor in the area economy is the current complex of medical facilities located in Houston. It is the feeling of most experts that this complex will continue to grow in importance to the areawide economy. This growth would suggest a potential for medical equipment or TumerCollie�Braden Inc 3-13 drug manufacturing operations in the area. However, the amount of such manufacturing in the area has been very limited. 3.4.1.4 Space Industry The existence of the NASA Center at Clear Lake was thought to offer some opportunities for growth in an emerging space industry. However, the fact that the Clear Lake facility only serves as a control and administrative center as opposed to a manufacturing operation seems to indicate that the opportunities for growth in this industry are somewhat limited. It is an industry that should be watched in the future to see if additional manufacturing centers begin to emerge other than the current aerospace concentration on the West Coast, Kansas, Missouri, and North Texas. 3.4.1.5 High Technology Industry Another industry group that is receiving attention from the economic development specialist in the area is the high technology group including electronics and robotics. Currently, efforts are underway to lure such operations to commu- nities such as The Woodlands in the north Houston area. Some success in attracting companies such as Texas Instruments to establish one of its manufacturing operations in the area has been attained. However, it seems likely that any high technology operation would be inclined to locate in the area near the Houston Intercontinental Airport since that area offers amenities such as The Woodlands near the airport. TurnerCollie�Brtden Inc 3-14 Tn all, the most significant factor emerging from the areawide economy that will impact La Porte is the container port at Barbours Cut. Since Barbours Cut is located adjacent to La Porte and most of the available industrial land near to that port is -located within the City or its extraterritorial jurisdiction, it seems reasonable to assume that, given the proper encourage- ment, those industries interested in utilizing the container facility would find value in locating in the area. 3.4.2 La Porte's Assets An inventory was made of the assets of La Porte from the viewpoint of a potential industry prospect.' The following describes the assets identified. 3.4.2.1 Galveston Bay Galveston Bay is a great economic asset to La Porte that is currently being vastly under-utilized. There is presently very little public or private development along the bay, as the bay front property is fragmented among various indi- vidual landowners with no large developable tracts existing anywhere except at Sylvan Beach Park. Sylvan Beach is therefore the most probable place for development unless the City aggres- sively undertakes policies to assemble enough land in another area to make development possible. From results of the survey con- ducted as part of this Comprehensive Plan, interviews with civic leaders in La Porte, and discussion with the Steering Committee, the general consensus is that the citizens of La Porte desire a TumerCollie c�Br�denlnc 3-15 marina facility on the bay.. This could be coupled ,with other recreational and commercial facilities to make the waterfront an area of activity and growth. Waterfront development should be initiated by the public•sector. This might be facilitated with the development of some type of management structure set up to deal specifically with the bay front area. The legal authority for this entity to function would be provided by either a special waterfront planning zone or a tax increment financing district. The main purpose of this entity.would be to use its authority to develop infrastructure and thus create incentives for private enterprise and developers. Table 22 shows a variety of incentives and approaches that could be utilized to develop the bay front area. 3.4.2.2 Barbours Cut One of the driving forces for La Porte's economy in the future appears to be the container port at Barbours Cut. There are presently three terminals operating at the Cut with a fourth under construction. The Port of Houston's master plan calls for continued construction at the Cut with additional terminals and an expansion of the turning basin to handle more and larger ships. Discussions with the Port Authority reveal that the Authority is planning to make Barbours Cut the primary container terminal for the entire Port of Houston. TumerCollie c�SBradeninc 3-16 TABLE 22 - WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT Public Sector Development Initiatives Management Structures o Waterfront Management Council o Quasi -Public Development Corporation o Private Development Corporation o Port Authority o Joint Public/Private Development Venture Approach to Waterfront Zones (Providing Legal Authority/Controls) o Designate a special waterfront planning area and recognize it as such in the City's Master Plan. Urban Development Incentives o Inducing Demand - Demand is the primary variable as to whether or not private development will occur. Institute recreational and cultural programs to attract people to the waterfront location. Tax incentives. Lowering price of public services. Public lease commitment. o Assisting in Land Assembly - Ground Leases - Inverse Leasebacks Land Writedowns Land Banking Land Exchange Relocation Assistance Other TurnerCollie�Braeien Inc 3-17 TABLE 22 (Cont'dI o Public Financing Assistance - Direct Loans Guaranteed Loans o Assistance Through Tax Policy - Property Tax Incentives Tax Abatement Special Taxation Districts Tax Increment Financing a Regulatory Simplification o Public Improvements - Upgrading Elements of Citywide Services Providing Waterfront Facilities - Constructing Public Amenities TumerCollie c�SBradenlnc 3-18 Containerization is fast becoming the major mode of transportation for the shipping industry. Goods can be put.into containers and shipped with better protection from the elements, more security, and less handling costs. When unloaded by cranes from the ships, containers can be placed upon rail cars or flatbed semi -trailers for shipment directly to the receiving dock. Under normal economic conditions, empty containers are not stored as happened in La Porte during the 1981 recession. One benefit of containers is their versatility. Almost any type of shipable good can be put into a container, whether it is a dry bulk good, a liquid, or a perishable good that requires a refrigerated container. Such items as resins, chemicals, cotton, fruits, wines, and shoes are currently being shipped through Barbours Cut are. The presence of Barbours Cut therefore makes for an attractive incentive for those industries that can utilize the container facilities. As Barbours Cut expands, more activity and opportunities can be foreseen for La Porte becoming a major shipping and manufacturing center. 3.4.2.3 Vacant Land One of the real, yet possibly overlooked, assets of La Porte is the abundance of vacant land. La Porte is still a long way from full development and has plenty of area for growth. The northern areas of the City provide ample space for port -related services and industries to grow near Barbours Cut, TumerCollie�Br�den Inc 3-19 The land north of SH 225 within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) provides even more room for growth while continuing to pro- vide tax dollars to the City. The availability of open land in the Lomax area provides areas for more housing to develop. Vacant land also exists in the southeastern part of the City, which could contain more housing and green space along Little Cedar Bayou. A breakdown of developed land by type along with the amount of undeveloped land existing in La Porte can be seen in Table 23. Vacant land exists in all sectors but pri- marily in residential. Developers may see this as an attractive situation since there is ample space available for single-family development. Industrial development has space to expand within the City and can also locate in the widely undeveloped ETJ and Bayport industrial District. La Porte, therefore, has plenty of space to grow, and with its abundance of open land. 3.4.2.4 Transportation The transportation system in La Porte is such that Barbours Cut can act as an excellent hub of imported and exported goods. Containerized imports can be landed at Barbours Cut and put on either rail cars or trucks and distributed economically to points through Texas and the Southwest. La Porte's proximity to major interstate highways make it economical to send goods north on Interstate Highway 45 (I-45) into the interior of Texas and east/west on Interstate Highway 10 (I-10) TurnerCollie�Bracien lnc 3-20 TABLE 23 -- LAND USE IN LA PORTE Sector Total Acreage Vacant 3,719 Residential Rural 11903 Single -Family 21299 Other 182 Industrial 346 Retail/Commercial 185 Public & Other 2,554 TOTAL 11,188 TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc. 3-21 to the western states or the Gulf Coast states. Likewise, exports can be containerized and shipped economically to foreign ports in Europe and South America. The transportation industry is particu- larly well -suited for the area due to these linkages of highway, rail, and sea. La Porte may consider its transportation system as a real asset to attract numerous industries that require such a transportation network. 3.4.2.5 School Svstem The La Porte School District is a major asset for the City of La Porte. La Porte schools are currently considered to be among the best in the state. This is an important selling point to potential new industry, as many of the companies' executives that are relocated have families and demand excellent schools for their children to attend. Residential communities can flourish when located within an excellent school district, as has been exemplified in many cities. The strength of the school system can be used as a competitive tool with other cities. Although Clear Lake may be an attractive area for plant managers and executives to live, it does not have as high -rated a school system as La Porte. This asset, however, must be capi- talized upon and La Porte should promote the availability of its high -quality schools in order to attract both future industry and residents. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 3-22 3.4.3 Competitive Position In order to assess the future economic growth of La Porte, it is necessary to understand its competitive position relative to surrounding communities and its ability to attract new industry. Among the cities analyzed were Deer Park, Pasadena, Baytown, and the Clear Lake City area. 3.4.3.1 Historical Development Southeast Harris County has developed outward from the City of Houston along two growth corridors. One growth corridor extends along I-45 southeast to Galveston and the other corridor extends to the east along SH 225 towards La Porte. This last corridor is constrained to the north and south by industrial areas. This has caused a "spillover" or "funnel" effect in which the cities closer to Houston become fully developed, forcing popu- lation to locate farther out along the corridor. This additional influx of population becomes a population that "spills over" into the next adjacent area or city. This effect can be seen in the varying growth rates of the cities in the SH 225 corridor. Table 24 displays the population statistics as well as the annual compounded growth rates for each of the cities considered. Observing the data for each city individu- ally, these trends can be seen. Pasadena, for instance, has had a constantly declining growth rate each decade from 1950-1980, with the high being in 1950 at 17.13 percent and falling to 2.29 percent in 1980. Deer Park peaked in 1960, a decade later than TumerCollie�Braden Inc M N K fl1 I N r O !P I O V' lZ N - J•1 O N p1 N N ri Vi V' Ifl �-1 0 O ri .a uX I M co ,dPI N 1� O1 ti N O C 8 V M 1O l0 m G C O r-1 N Ln O M •rl W .-� N Nj W O O Ln M Ln aPI CV qw N U OM N CD ent f� oo cq T ri OON 0 W W� NN co N en to qw N •rl UI G O U 1� N N % C Y 01 Ln E; S4 a ro Oft s+ .f m c n CO �N anyi r cor �c N d' N N C -1 N C O .N to ri O N N N a �y Of � CD V� N l� o C b C rml C o � N M m rn Z yti. b VO' r N in Qw W m W 12 4L N in Cco rml O c� 1 rl O C1 qw N] O U �] CD CD �J CD N N b CDco7 3-24 Pasadena, and has experienced a declining growth rate ever since as it builds out behind Pasadena. Baytown; due to its geographic isolation from the growth corridor, has experienced a fairly constant growth rate through the years that has stayed around the 2 to 4 percent range. The incorporated cities in the Clear Lake City area experienced a substantial growth rate of 16.34 percent during the decade of the 1960s due to the rapid expansion of the space program and the location of the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Clear Lake City. However, the growth rate for this area dropped back to a slower pace of 2.83 percent by 1980. In contrast to all of the other cities along the growth corridor, the City of La Porte has experienced an increasing growth rate during each decade, starting from a low of 0.19 percent in 1950 and rising to 7.0 percent during the decade ending in 1980. In fact, La Porte had the highest growth rate of the cities observed in the area and may not yet have reached its peak growth rate. Thus, the "spill over" or "funnel" effect can be depicted in the eastern movement of population out of Houston, filling up Pasadena, then Deer Park, and becoming an increasing factor in the future growth of La Porte, 3.4.3.2 Pasadena With a population of 112,560, Pasadena is by far the largest city of those in the La Porte area. As can be seen from Table 25, Pasadena has a large number of manufacturing TurnerColliefe<Bracien Inc 3-25 TABLE 25 - MANUFACTURING AND RETAIL POSITION OF SELECTED CITIES CltY La Porte Deer Park Pasadena Baytown Clear Lake Area Number of Manufacturers 27 19 73 m 13 Number of Retail Establishments 119 104 734 515 227 Retail Sales S 66,663,000 49,946,000 4291088,000 276,361,000 Source: 1977 Census of Business, U.S. Department of Commerce TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 3-26 operations with many of them concentrated in the petrochemical field. Also, Pasadena has a large number of retail establishments and produces significantly more retail sales than any of the other area communities. Pasadena's ability to draw from areas such as Deer Park, La Porte, and South Houston undoubtedly contributes significantly to this large lead in retail sales. Pasadena currently has reached a mature stage in its overall growth rate and the opportunities for new manufacturing operations in that area are minimal. virtually all of the land that would provide access to the ship channel is already developed with petrochemical operations. The only major area available for development within Pasadena that could compete with La Porte is the Bayport indus- trial area. Almost all of the land within this area has been sold to large petrochemical operations. while these operations originally purchased the property with plans for expansion, the environmental constraints indicate that any expansion in the area will be extremely limited. Therefore, should some of these major companies with large land holdings decide to sell some of their property, they would pose a competitive threat to locating manu- facturing in the La Porte area. 3.4.3.3 Deer Park The City of Deer Park is located just west of La Porte and east of Pasadena. Deer Park has grown to a city of over 22,000 as a result of the spillover from Pasadena. As development has continued, Deer Park is also beginning to mature TumerCollie�cSBraden Inc 3-27 and the growth that La Porte has experienced in the Fairmont Park area represents a continuation of this spillover effect. Deer Park has the lowest number of manufacturing and retail establish- ments in the area. It does not represent a significant threat to the La Porte area in terms of industrial development. 3.4.3.4 Baytown Located across the ship channel from La Porte and adjacent to I-10, Baytown has a population of 54,162. Baytown is set apart geographically from the other cities under consideration but it is also in a strong economic position. While Baytown's manufacturing sector is highly petrochemical in nature and about equal in number to La Porte, the number of retail establishments and the retail sales figures stand out for a city of its size (see Table 25). The city has its own core market for retail since it is geographically cut off by the ship channel. Because of this abundance of retail, Baytown citizens shop within their town and also draw citizens from other towns across the channel, such as La Porte and Deer Park, to shop in its major shopping mall. Baytown's good access to I-10 makes it easy for commuters to get to Houston yet live near the bay. Another economic asset for Baytown is the presence of the Junior College and five hospitals within the city. Thus, Baytown is the most self-sufficient of the towns observed. Baytown is not likely to compete for the same type of industries that would find La Porte attractive. TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc 3-28 This is due to the fact that the only access across Lite ship channel is a two-lane tunnel. Thus, industries wishing to use the port at Barbours Cut would have to move containers through the tunnel. in the future.if a bridge is built, Baytown could compete with La Porte for -export manufacturing. 3.4.3.5 Clear Lake Area The Clear Lake area is located south of La Porte and the Bayport Industrial Complex. It is composed of the cities of Seabrook, E1 Lago, Taylor Lake Village, Nassau Bay, and Clear Lake City. While Seabrook has the asset of the bay front, Clear Lake City has the NASA Space Center and the University of Houston at Clear Lake City. This area is characterized by pro- fessional people, many of whom are employed at NASA and the University. It is recreation -oriented since the income levels are high and facilities are available, including 12 major marinas on Clear Lake and a country club. Manufacturing in this area is very light and what little there is, is mostly sailmaking, canvas, and boating supplies. Retail sales are fairly strong in the area due to higher income brackets with more discretionary income (see Table 25). Adjacency to I-45, the natural harbor at Clear Lake, and the bay front all provide for a pleasant place to live. When combined with the professional people living there and the standard of living they have obtained, this area makes for a sound residential and recreational community. TumerCollie c�$Br�denlnc � 3-29 Given Clear Lake's economic base, it is unlikely that manufacturing operations other than high technology would move to the area. Also, the presence of the Bayport Indus- trial Park between Clear Lake and La Porte would serve as an attraction, for such operations. Thus, the_.Clear Lake City area will not compete with La Porte for the same type of industries. 3.4.4 Growth Potential As a result of the above analysis, the following industries were identified as potential growth opportunities for the City of La Porte, 3.4.4.1 Plastics When attempting to identify new industries for La Porte, the initial step is to look at further integration of those industries already producing in La Porte. Since petro- chemicals is the major manufacturing sector in the area, the chemical industry was researched extensively, taking those chemicals currently produced in La Porte and seeing what addi- tional processes were required to produce an end product that could be shipped in containers. Table 26 displays those chemicals currently being produced in La Porte and lists their end products and usage percentages. Some of the end products shown in this table take more processes to produce the end product than others. Mindful that the citizens of La Porte do not want additional pollution, emphasis was placed on those products that require only one or two additional processes. Also, some minor products 1 ITurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc TABLE 26 - CONSUMPTION PATTERNS Chemicals Currently Produced in La Porte End Products Polypropylene Extrusion: Fibers and Filaments Film Other . Injection Molding: Transportation Consumer Products Rigid Packaging Appliances Other Blow Molding Miscellaneous Applications Exports Tetrahydrofuran Resin Solvent (PCV) Polyethylene Resins High Density Blow Molding Injection Molding Pipe & Tubing Film (12 Mils & Less) Wire & Cable Other Extruded Products Sheet (Over 12 Mils) Miscellaneous Applications Exports Low Density Film Injection Molding Extrusion Coating Wire & Cable Other Extruded Products Blow Molding Pipe & Conduit Miscellaneous Applications Exports Analine Rubber Chemicals Dyes & Dye Intermediates Drugs Miscellaneous 3-30 Percent Used 44.38 30.9% 5.4% 700% 34.68 12.8% 5.1% 4.58 3.48 8.8% 1.68 9. 2% 10.98 37.58 20.0$ 6.7% 3.0% 2.5% 2,0% 1.7% 17.1% 9.5% 59.38 9.88 8.6% 5.3% 1.1% 0.7% 0.5% 8.0% 6.7% 35.08 6.08 4.0$ 9.0% TurnerCollie c�Bradenlnc TABLE 26 (Cont'd) Chemicals Currently Produced in La Porte Acetone Propylene Glycol Polyether Polyols Diethylene Glycol Ethylene Glycol Hydrogen Peroxide Ammonia Sulfate 3-31 End Products Percent Used Pharmaceuticals 6.0% Miscellaneous 20.08 Exports 6.0% Polyester Resin 46.08 Pet Food 10.0% Cellophane 9.5% Miscellaneous 6.08 Exports 9.5% Urethane Foam 86.08 Non -Urethane Applications 5.0% Exports 9.0% Miscellaneous (Blending into Anti -Freeze) 14.08 Exports 6.0% Antifreeze 46.0% Exports 2.08 Textiles 30.08 Plasticizers 28.0$ Pulp & Paper 4.08 Miscellaneous Applications 21.0$ Fertilizer & Other (Food Processing) 47.08 Exports 25.0% TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc 3-32 are in slow growth markets. Table 27 displays those chemicals that are produced in La Porte and show the most feasibility of being produced into their end products in the La Porte area. The table also shows growth rates and factors for plastic production. These end products then could be easily shipped out of'La Porte in containers. While manufacturing of plastic products may be possible in La Porte, those firms will not locate in La Porte unless a concerted effort is made to bring them to the City. The chemicals produced in La Porte are shipped out in bulk to be processed into end products in plants concentrated in the northeast. The nature of the industry is to locate closer to the end user rather than the raw material. Because construction of a new plant represents such a large capital investment, chemical companies are very selective about where they locate new plants. Therefore, visibility, economic incentives, and a close working relationship with potential corporations would be necessary to attract plastics companies closer to their raw materials. 3.4.4.2 Export Manufacturing Manufacturing of products for export is a natural choice for La Porte. End products such as plastic housings for appliances, PVC pipe, or numerous injection molded plastics products could be produced in La Porte. Also, any type TumerCollie c�jBradenlnc TABLE 21 - PLASTICS PRODUCTION Chemicals Polypropelyne Resins Polyethylene_ Resins Vinyl Chloride Monomer Product Class Consumer & Commercial Construction Factors for Growth 3-33 Applications Fibers, Injection Molding Blow Molding, Injection Molding, Pipe & Tubing Used in Production of PVC (Pipe) Compound Annual Growth .Rate 1301% 10.48 New Applications Substitutions for Other Materials (Transportation) Construction (PVC) Harris County Employment 3070 - Miscellaneous Plastic Products = 5,899 (0.58 of Labor Force) Value of Industry Shipments $37,00010001000 TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc 3-34 of assembly operations using component parts brought in by rail or truck could be produced for export through Barbours Cut. Containerized cargo is usually high -value items due to the extra security and protection that containers can provide. Light manufacturing of these items would provide La Porte with the clean, nonpolluting industry that it desires. It would also provide La Porte with more employment than the highly automated petrochemical plants can supply. Although light manufacturing operations will bring tax dollars to the City and provide more employment, it will not bring as many tax dollars proportionally as the petrochemical plants have in the past. These tax implications should be considered when selecting a strategy for the City. 3.4.4.3 Warehousing/Trucking Another industry that could utilize the assets of La Porte is the trucking and warehousing industry. As Harbours Cut continues to expand its operations, increased truck- ing as well as rail activity can be expected to follow. This may give rise to more warehousing of both goods being imported or exported. However, due to the existence of the "50 Mile Rule," container stuffing must be performed by longshoremen at the port if the container originates within 50 miles of the port of entry. This law applies only to consolidated containers with contents from different companies. Due to the high cost of longshoreman labor, a warehousing and distribution center could exist only if TumerCollie�B�den Inc 3-35 it .is run by a single corporation receiving and shipping goods for its own use, thus avoiding the high labor costs. Firms should find shipping components in by container, storing them.in a ware- house adjacent to Barbours Cut, then distributing them to their individual plants in the area an economical arrangement. 3.4.4.4 Port Related Many port -related services are needed to support a container port and these could locate in the vicinity of Barbours Cut as it expands. Table 28 gives a listing of those services needed by a fully developed container port. As can be seen in the table, a multitude of services may locate adjacent to La Porte, providing many jobs in the service sector. These services should be encouraged to locate in areas of La Porte allowing business -industrial activities. 3.4.4.5 Cold Storage Another potential industry that is closely tied to Barbours Cut is that of cold storage. Demand for this service is currently strong, as there is a lack of cold storage facilities in the Houston area. Shipping interests recently have been advocating such a plant in the Houston area, citing that much business goes elsewhere because of the lack of such a facility. One, possibly two, cold storage plants have been planned for the Port of Houston and probably will be located within the foreign trade zone. La Porte, however, could be a natural site for such a facility due to its close proximity to Barbours Cut container TumerCollie�Br�den Inc 3-36 TABLE 28 - PORT -RELATED SERVICES Bulk Liquid Storage Bunkering, Fuel Oil, and Lubricants Car/Truck Servicing (Import) Cargo Weighing, Sampling, Inspection, and Analysis Charter Brokers Container Leasing Container Repairs Cranes Customshouse Brokers Dredging Equipment and Services Export Packing and Crating Freight Forwarders Government Agencies Marine Supplies Motor Truck Lines Railroads Ship Cleaning and Maintenance Steamship Agents and Operators Stevedoring Firms Terminal operations Towage and Lighterage Warehouse Operators Watchmen Services TurnerCollie�Br�den Inc 3-37 operations. Refrigerated containers are fast becoming a major mode of transportation for perishable goods. Demand for refriger- ated containers is running at about 95 percent of capacity while demand for standard dry box containers is running at about 82 per- cent of the world fleet. This is because food shipments are not as affected during a recession as other goods and because it is cheaper to use a refrigerated container than to use a refrigerated ship. Thus, perishable goods may be brought in refrigerated con- tainers to Harbours Cut and put into a cold storage facility until distributed from that point. 3.4.4.6 Recreation La Porte is in a unique position to capital- ize upon demand for recreation. With the asset of La Porte's bay front, with its direct access to Galveston Bay and its loca- tion being only a 30-minute drive from Houston, La Porte is a natural location for recreational development. Since it is the closest point to Houston on the bay, single -day recreational activities could prove to be attractive. Currently, there are over 86,000 boats registered in Harris County and over 55 percent of them exceed 16 feet in length. As can be seen from Table 29, a total of 4,752 slips currently exist at Clear Lake. The pre- sence of a marina on the bay could be an attraction for daytime users. In order to develop a marina at La Porte, it would be necessary to construct the breakwater to provide TumerCollie�Braden Inc 3-38 TABLE 29 - REGISTERED BOATS IN HARRIS COUNTY 1978 86,583 1980 85,041 1982 86,882 1983 86,429 1984 86,219 Reoistered Boats by Length Feet 16 and 65 and Total Less 16-26 26-40 40-65 Over 1984 86,219 38,328 46,091 1,604 195 1 Boat Slips (Commercial Facilities at Clear Lake) Existing Proposed Total 1984 3,226 1,526 4,752 TumerCollie�Braden Inc 3-39 protection for those people -who wish to dock or store their boats in the marina. Recreational development would produce employment in support services such as restaurants, bait and tackle, boating equipment, and gasoline. Indirect efforts could provide for more retail sales in the area and more publicity about La Porte as a recreational center. This would bring additional dollars into the La Porte economy. Sponsored outdoor activities could also draw more people and attention to the bay front. If a con- certed effort were made, the recreational potential for La Porte could make the City the recreational center that it once was. 3.4.5 Evaluation of New Industry Potential Each of the industries identified in the previous paragraph was analyzed to determine its potential impact on La Porte. Initially, the projected growth rates for these industries were analyzed to determine where the greatest potential would lie', after which an input/output model was utilized to determine the impact, both direct and indirect, upon the area. Finally, an analysis was made on the probability that the industries would locate in the area. The following paragraphs contain the results of these analyses. 3.4.5.1 Future Industrial Growth Exhibit 18 shows the projected annual growth rates of the various industries that have been identified as Potential for the La Porte area. As can be seen from the chart, recreation expenditures and expenditures on boats are two of the TumerCollleOBraden Inc 3-40 highest growth rate areas. Recreation expenditures over the next 20 years are expected to grow at an annual rate of almost 9 per- cent, while expenditures on boats are expected to grow at a 6 per- cent rate. Similarly, the growth in exports is anticipated over the next 20 years to approach 8 percent per year. The expendi- tures on port -related activities are expected to grow at an annual rate of about 4 percent a year. These two industries would go hand -in -hand in the La Porte area. Conversely, the petrochemical industry in the United States is expected to grow at less than 1 percent per year over the next 20 years. This indicates little opportunity for additional employment or tax base creation in the La Porte area. These projections are similar to the conclusions that were reached earlier relative to the petrochemical industry in the area. Finally, the trucking industry is expected to grow at less than a 2 percent per year rate, although this may be higher in the La Porte area due to the presence of Barbours Cut. 3.4.5.2 Economic Impact In order to evaluate the impact of each of these industries upon the City, an input/output model was developed that was based upon the U.S. Department of Commerce's model and adjusted for the area economy. Table 30 shows the impact of the various industries in terms of an employment multi- plier that could be expected as the result of growth in one of these industries. It can be noted that the plastics industry TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc 3-41 TABLE 30 - INDUSTRIAL GROWTH POTENTIAL Employment Probaty Multiplier of Location Trucking and Warehousing 290 High Refrigerated Warehousing 2.7 Container operations 395 High Recreation/Marina 2.5-3.5 High Plastics Industry 8.0 Low Export Manufacturing 2A4 3e7 Medium -High TumerCollie�B►aden Inc 3-42 has had an extremely high employment multiplier due primarily to the fact that much of the supporting industry exists within the area. Container support operations and recreation could create 3 to 3-1/2 times the number of jobs within the area. While this multiplier is significantly lower than the plastics industry, it also suggests a long-term potential to develop support industries for these operations and ultimately to increase the employment multiplier in the long term. Export manufacturing would create a multi- plier effect of 2.4 to 3.7 times for the area. Table 31 shows the projected high growth industries in terms of exports. It also shows the potential employment multiplier for the area. This also could be improved over time with the buildup of support industries. Trucking and warehousing offer the lowest multiplier for the area. Within that group, however, refrigerated warehous- ing does have a slight edge in terms of the employment multiplier it would generate. 3.4.5.3 Locational Factors Marinas and support operations for con- tainers have extremely high probability of locating in the area. Recreational industry could be encouraged considerably through financing incentives for development along the bay. Container operations are highly likely to locate in the area simply because of proximity to Barbours Cut, TumerCollie�Braden Inc TABLE 31 - FASTEST GROWING EXPORT INDUSTRIES SIC Industry 3532 Mining Machinery 3533 Oil Field Machinery 3541 Machine Tools, Metal Cutting 3544 Special Dies and Tools 3561 Pumps and Pumping Equipment Projected Export Growth Rate 16.1$ 20.0% 16.58 3-43 Employment Multiplier* 3.67 3.67 2.70 2.41 2.68 *LWFW's Input/Output Model Source: ,U.S. Industrial Outlook, U.S. Department of Commerce TurnerCollieOBraden Inc 3-44 Similarly, trucking and warehousing have a high probability of locating in the area due to demands created by the container port. The export manufacturing operations have a medium to high probability of locating in the area. This is due to the fact that some companies may see valueinmoving to the area, however, it is more likely that a concerted program will be required to attract this type of manufacturing. While the plastics industry would seem to be naturally attracted to the area, in fact, the probability of locating in La Porte is low. This is due to environmental considerations and to the slow growth that the industry is experiencing in the country. Opportunities within the plastics industry may be greater for certain segments such as injection molding or export operations. These particular industry segments should be pursued actively since the overall probability of locat- ing in the area might be higher than for the industry as a whole. Also, the large employment multiplier effect of that particular industry would seem to offer positive growth opportunities for La Porte. 3.4.5.4 Conclusions In consideration of the factors mentioned, it appears that the development of a recreational industry within the La Porte area offers the highest probability for success. However, it must be remembered that the amount of employment in this particular industry is not likely to be very high, and hence TurnerCollie�Br�den Inc 3-45 its overall impact on the employment picture may be small. This is counterbalanced by the fact that much of the money spent would be imported dollars coming from outside the City of La Porte and these expenditures will have a significant economic impact on the community. The second most likely operation to be attracted to the area is the port support industries group that was previously identified. The industries in this group would interact with the container port at Barbours Cut. It would be important to control the location of these operations by limiting their location to the ETJ area north of SH 225. Trucking and warehousing operations should be treated in a similar manner. The plastics industry and the export manu- facturing operations will require a concerted effort on the part of the City or the Chamber of Commerce to identify and woo these particular companies. It is particularly significant to search out export manufacturing companies who could locate within La Porte and provide not only jobs but expand the overall tax base for the City. TumerCollie�Braden Inc - • - X H INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION EMPLOYMENT GROWTH POPULATION GROWTH RETAIL SALES GROWTH DEMANDFOR RESIDENTIAL LAND D EMAND FOR COMMERCIAL LAND DEMANDFOR INDUSTRIAL LAND LAND USE DEMAND LA PORTE COMPREHENSIVE CLAN ® EXH BIT TumerColliec Br�denlnc IN ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH 11 9.0 0�] W H Q 5.0 �I PETRO- TRUCKING PORT EXPENDITURES EXPORTS RECREATION CHEMICAL RELATED ON BOATS EXPENDITURES LA PORTE TumerCollie(gBraden Inc, N A 9 9 0 C I A FUTURE INDUSTRIAL GROWTH 1 T H LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH - ENVIRONMENT S • 4. 1 History E 4.2 Economic Environment C 4.3 Physical Environment - l O N 4.0 SECTION 4.0 - ENVIRONMENT 4-1 The purpose of this section of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide a summary description of the factors that make up the City of La Porte's environment. The section is not intended to present a comprehensive data base, which is beyond the scope of the present work, but it does include the principal environmental factors that were taken into account in the development of the Comprehensive Plan. The environment of La Porte has heen divided into two principal areas: o Economic, which considers the factors and forces that shape La Porte's population and economy, and o Physical, which considers the elements that physically determine La Porte's environment. 4.1 History The City of La Porte is one of the oldest cities in Harris County and is the only existing city in the county other than Houston that was incorporated by 1900. The City was developed as a new town by a group of investors from Ohio headed by I. R. Holmes, a Colorado developer, who in 1891 started out the town at Five Points in the heart of today's older part of La Porte. The promoters named the town La Porte, which means "the door" in French. In 1892 the City was incorporated and in the following years, various hotels were developed in order to attract people to the new bay town. In 1896 the developers were bought out by a Galveston banking firm, but in 1898 Holmes attracted additional TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 4-2 investors and established East La Porte, which flourished until the Spanish American War and his death. In 1915 East La Porte was destroyed by a hurricane but old La Porte was thiriving due to the popularity of Sylvan Beach Park, which attracted numerous weekend visitors. It was not until after World War II that La Porte began to see additional growth due to the growth of the petrochemical industry in the area. Exhibit 19 shows La Porte's physical growth after the 1950s until the present date. It must be noted that the City has more than tripled the territory within its city limits and has con- siderable areas devoted to industry within its extraterritorial limits. 4.2 Economic Environment The economy of the City of La Porte has been a result of the extension of the growth of the petrochemical industry along the Houston Ship Channel. As land along the ship channel was developed, it forced new development farther out toward Galveston Bay resulting in the current situation of petrochemical operations lining both sides of the ship channel. The impact of this indus- trial development upon the various sectors of La Porte are dis- cussed in the following sections. 4.2.1 Population Historically, the City of La Porte has experienced substantial population growth only in the past two decades. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 4-3 Throughout the decade of the 1950s, the annual growth rate was less than 1 percent. But during the 1960s, the growth rate increased to just under 5 percent and accelerated during the 1970s to an annual rate of.7 percent. So far in the decade of the 1980s, one annexation and one consolidation of adjacent areas have increased population levels at an annual rate of almost 20 percent. However, this growth rate will not continue and the actual growth rate of La Porte will remain closer to 6 percent (Table 32). The population growth of the entire Houston metro- politan area occurred at an annual growth rate of 3.3 percent during the 1960s, accelerating to 3.7 during the 1970s. The projection for the Houston area for the period 1980-1985 is for a growth rate of only 2.7 percent, indicating that growth in the Houston area has slowed substantially. This decline can be attributed to the slowdown in Houston's economy and its dependency upon the cyclical effects of the energy industry. Comparison of growth rates in La Porte with those of Houston indicate that while the slowdown in growth has been significant in the metropolitan area, only a slight effect has been felt in La Porte. The continued high growth of La Porte can be attributed to its economic assets that attract growth, notably the abundance of inexpensive, vacant land for the development of single-family residential neighborhoods. TurnerCollie c�Bradenlnc TABLE 32 - HISTORICAL POPULATION GROWTH Year 1950 1960 1970 1980 1984 Plus Annexed Areas Lomax Spenwick/College View TOTAL Population 4,429 4,512 7,149 14,062 17,752 3,783 2,718 24,253 La Porte Annual Growth Rate 0.19% 4.71% 7.00% 6.00% 19.928* Houston Annual Growth Rate, 3.38 3.78 *Growth rate represents growth experienced by the annexation of Lomax and the Spenwick and College View MUDS in 1981 and 1984, respectively. Estimate prepared by LWFW. Source': 1980 Census TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 4-5 4.2.2 Income Table 33 displays the income levels of the citizens of La Porte. It should be noted that the median income per household in La Porte is nearly 15 percent higher than that of Harris County. This higher level of income is the result of the abundance of petrochemical plants in the immediate area provid- ing high employment with a relatively high pay scale. In fact, nearly half of the households in La Porte earn incomes of $201000-$40,000. 4.2.3 Employment and Industry Base The City of La Porte has much of its employment base concentrated in the manufacturing sector. About 25 percent of La Porte's labor force is engaged in manufacturing as opposed to Houston's 18 percent and the state of Texas' 15.5 percent. As was mentioned earlier and can be seen in Table 34, three-quarters of the manufacturing employment is concentrated in the petro- chemical area. The remainder of the manufacturing sectors repre- sent less than 10 percent of the work force and does not offer an industrial base from which to grow. The next largest employment sector is professional services, which includes doctors, lawyers, and teachers. These professionals desire to live near the bay front and may not actually be employed within the City of La Porte. Retail trade currently represents 14 percent of total employment. However, due to the accessibility of major regional TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc i TAHLE 33 - INCOME PER HOUSEHOLD Number of Income Households Percent Less than $5,000 428 9 $ 5,000-$10,000 306 7 $10,000-$15,000 464 10 $15,000-$20,000 572 13 $20,000-$251000 564 13 $25,000-$30,000 653 14 $301000-$35,000 547 12 $35,000-$40,000 334 7 $40,000-$50,000 479 11 Above $50,000 160 4 Median Income (La Porte) 524,306 Median Income (Harris County) $20,806 Source: 1980 Census TumerCollie c�Braden Inc TABLE 34 - MANUFACTURERS sector Chemicals and Allied Products Stone, Clay, Glass Products Fabricated Metal Products Machinery Except Electrical Printing and Publishing Al and Gas Extraction Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Fiber/Steel Drums TOTAL Employees 2,047 195 179 41 20 75 16 175 2,748 Source: 1982 Texas Directory of Manufacturers 4-7 Percent of Manufacturing Work Force 75 7 6 2 1 3 1 6 100 TurnerCollie�Braden Inc malls in nearby cities, much of this retail employment is probably citizens of La Porte who work in other cities. Actual retail facilities within La Porte are not commensurate with its popula- tion, and geographic barriers prevent regional centers from locat- ing in La Porte. Thus, taxable retail dollars are lost to other cities. Once again, the citizens of La Porte expressed a desire to see additional retail facilities within the City. Employment in construction has been significant due to the substantial increase in the single-family subdivisions that have developed on the western side of La Porte. Construction will continue to expand with the continued growth of Barbours Cut, which is located adjacent to La Porte, and with the development of the bay front. All other employment sectors within the economy of La Porte represent less than 7 percent of total employment. These sectors will grow at a natural rate as the City grows, but employment in the transportation sector may grow at a faster pace due to increased container activity at Barbours Cut Terminal. As Barbours Cut continues to expand, so also should employment in transportation and port -related services (Table 35). It is important to remember that La Porte is not an isolated community. Employment opportunities for the citizens of La Porte exist outside the City and people from surrounding areas may come into La Porte to find employment. This is reflected in the fact that only about one-third of the people who live in La TumerCollie(cSBr�den Inc i TABLE' 35 - EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY SECTOR La Porte La Porte Houston Industry Employment- Percent Percent Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 204 3e2 5.2 Construction 901 1493 10.3 Manufacturing 1,577 25.0 1801 Transportation 271 4.3 5.4 Communications, Utilities 182 2e9 390 Wholesale Trade 233 3.7 6.3 Retail Trade 935 14eS 1501 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 244 3.9 6.7 Business Services 297 4.7 5.8 Personal Services 98 106 3e9 Professional Services 1,155 18.3 17e5 Public Administration 201 3.2 2.6 Source: 1980 Census TurnerCollie�Br�den Inc 4-10 Porte work in La Porte. This is confirmed by reviewing the types of occupations in which the citizens of La Porte are employed. Table 36 shows the great number of managerial/professional types and technical/salespeople that are living in La Porte-. This is due to the desire of such people to live close to the bay front and commute to their job. 4.2.4 Residential Housing development in La Porte has been a two -phased effort. Initially, "old La Porte" grew along the bay front, attracting people interested in living near the water. This development consisted of older homes on the east side of SH 146, and much of the area now is in need of revitalization. •The second phase of the growth of La Porte has been much more recent and has been due to the spillover effect from Deer Park. Much of this development has been in the Fairmont Park area and has been mostly single-family dwellings. As can be seen from Table 37, most of the residential housing units within the City of La Porte are of the single-family residential type. The cost of single-family homes in the Fairmont Park area is very reasonable and has contributed to the signifi- cant growth rate of La Porte. The median value of a home in La Porte in 1980 was $53,000 (Table 37). 4.2.5 Transportation Systems Currently, SH 225 is the main entrance into La Porte and industrial land borders each side of the highway, making this TurnerCollie�Br�den Inc TABLE 36 - EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION Occupation Manager/Professional Technical, Sales, Administrative Services Farming, Forestry, Fishing Precision Production, Crafts Operators and Laborers Source: 1980 Census Number Percent 1,237 19.6 1,827 29.0 687 10.9 56 0.9 1,301 20e7 1,190 18.9 TumerCollie�Braden Inc TABLE 37 --HOUSING UNITS Number Type of Units Percent Single -Family 3,895 78 Duplex 69 1 Fourplex 39 1 Multifamily 643 13 Mobile Home 343 7 TOTAL 41989 100 Median Value of Homes Median Rent Median Mortgage Source: 1980 Census $53,200 5279 5482 4-12 TumerCollie�Braden Inc 4-13 entrance to the City somewhat undesirable. As Barbours Cut con- tinues to grow, heavy truck traffic will continue to congest SH 225 and SH 146 at Barbours Cut Boulevard. This traffic, however, is addressed in detail in the proposed Thoroughfare Plan and in paragraph 4.3.11 of this section. The main north/south link within the City is SH 146, which goes north through the tunnel to Baytown and runs to the west of the older sections of La Porte, continuing south to Seabrook. The older section of La Porte is linked internally by West Main, Broadway, and East Fairmont Parkway. These streets connect the Central Business District and the main commercial strip and the high school. This acts as the nucleus of the original city. Connecting this section with the newer Fairmont Park area and the western sections are only two routes --Fairmont Parkway and Spencer Highway. As La Porte grows, the east/west linkages will have to be improved, and an oppor- tunity may exist once the Beltway is completed to develop Fairmont Parkway or Spencer Highway into the main entrance into La Porte, keeping truck traffic confined to the north on SH 225. This would enhance the image of La Porte as well as alleviate congestion. Rail transportation in La Porte currently exists along the southern side of SH 225 and extends on to Barbours Cut. Another rail line turns south of SH 225 and runs parallel to SH 146. This rail system is owned by the Southern Pacific Railroad which also owns a large tract of land in the north - central section of La Porte, Southern Pacific currently plans TumerCollie�Braden Inc 4-14 a "switching yard to be developed upon this an As Barbours Cut continues to expand, this rail yard may become more and more of a necessity for Southern Pacific. La -Porte also has the unique quality of being able to provide air transportation. It is one of the few cities in the bay area that have an airport. As increased development of the airport takes place, the airport will become a valuable economic asset to the City. 4.2.6 Location The City of La Porte is situated in a unique geo- graphical position. Located in southeast Harris County, La Porte is in a growth corridor that is expected to develop further as the entire Houston metropolitan area grows. The largest and most obvious physical factor is that of Galveston Bay. This is an asset not possessed by such neighboring cities as Deer Park, Pasadena, and Clear Lake City. The bay makes La Porte a more attractive place to live because of the inherent qualities of waterfront property. Another locational advantage of La Porte is its proximity to the ship channel and Barbours Cut Terminal. As Barbours Cut becomes one of the major container terminals in the Port of Houston, La Porte will have increasing opportunities to capture businesses given the limited availability of space and facilities in Morgan's Point. TurnerCollie c�SBradenlnc 4-15 While La Porte's location on the ship channel has served to attract petrochemical plants, it has also limited some development in La Porte. Because La Porte is essentially isolated from surrounding communities to the north by the ship channel and to the east by the bay, the opportunities for retail development have been minimized. Also, the man-made barrier of the Bayport Industrial Complex has essentially cut off any economic inter- action with cities to the south of La Porte. 4.2.7 Bav Development The bay front at La Porte is underdeveloped. This is due to the fact that the bay front is fragmented by many small lots with individual owners. Most of the existing structures along the bay are older and many are in disrepair* old piers and pilings litter the coastal waters. There is virtually no commer- cial or retail activity along the bay front so that when people come to La Porte, they are not even aware of the bay since La Porte lacks a "city by the sea" feeling and atmosphere. The only public development along the bay front is Sylvan Beach Park, which itself has been in need of repair since Hurricane Alicia in 1983. Since Sylvan Beach is presently owned by the county, the City has no real control over the bay front. The Pavillion at Sylvan Beach is the only commercial -type operation in La Porte that utilizes the bay. Private real estate development thus far has been limited to the Woods on the Bay condominium development on the south side of La Porte. TumerCollie�Bnden Inc 4-16 4.3 Physical Environment The elements to be discussed as a part of La Porte's physical environment include: o Climate o Topography o Geology o soils o Groundwater o Subsidence and Ground Faults o Drainage o Flooding o Vegetation and Fauna o Rare and Endangered Species o Areas of Environmental Concern o Transportation o Land Use o utilities 4.3.1 Climate The climate in the Coastal Region in which La Porte is located is temperate and typified by hot summers, mild winters, and warm springs and autumns. Temperatures range from an average of 450 in January to 85o in July. Rainfall in the area is some- what unpredictable and varies considerably from year to year. Average annual precipitation is around 45 to 50 inches, with the most rain usually falling in the summer months. Table 38 shows average temperature and total precipitation for the last five available years for the area. 4.3.2 Topography The topography of La Porte is generally flat. Eleva- tions in the City vary slightly and rise gradually from sea level to 30 feet above sea level towards the northeast corner of the TumerCollie�Braden Inc r v 0107 Q1OO FI �D�D�Dnr �IrLnLnro% j Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln J (� MM ri VAN o rnnrr N r %D m O .-1 U] conmmm-.. InN C'u11n �i co 0000 co 00 7 CN V tn4c f077 00 00 CD 0000 m r N N N r, mwo0mm nvl%Dinko r r n n n 00rnrNr %o kD kD r kD rl f0 ) N O M V £ If�`ko ko10 t0 a y r N m c m .sr qw 1n 111 In In R In n�OmM 00 O% O r N nrwco00 rnrnrnrnrn r r rtir r M tD tD 00 m O1 Om 4Dm HI N tD V' M O r m sT [UI m r N %D O rM4 M 00 %D m N ra r t0 M W m O N O NO Mry 1 M O In N r-I r� %D�qwqw00 O i V N M r r-1 Ntn 0%M eq d 1 r fM V O rti %D 00 V n 1n m OOO C' r-i incma� M t�d'M rivco.� C'm Q\1f7N O MM Or -I O co 00 MO O� Il1 T O� 00 00 M tD r-I r-1 O Q1 O r-I N nrmo�m rnrnrnrna+ M 7 ti 4-18 City. Exhibit 20 depicts the principal topographic contours within La Porte. Slopes in the area are below 2 percent. 4.3.3 Geology The City of La Porte is within the TexasIG Coast region which lies along the northern edge of the Gulf Coast Geosyncline. The upper crustal zone of most of the La Porte area was formed during the Pleistocene Epoch of the Quaternary Period. The region is generally described as the Brazos Pleistocene Fluvial -Deltaic System, as shown on Exhibit 21 (St. Clair et. al., 1975; Rice Center, 1976). The sediments of the near shore area of Galveston Bay adjacent to La Porte are classified as Halocene- Modern Bay -Lagoon System (Rice Center, 1976). 4.3.4 Soils The Harris County area consists primarily of nearly level clayey and loamy prairie soils as shown on Exhibit 22. The soils of the La Porte area are primarily of the Beaumont and Lake Charles soil series with some areas of Bernard and Vermont soil series (Exhibit 23). All of these series are clayey, moderately acid to moderately alkaline soils with poor drainage and very slow permeability. These series have a high shrink -swell potential and high corrosion potential for uncoated steel. The Beaumont and Vamont clays have a moderate corrosion potential toward concrete. Table 39 presents a summary of the behavior of La Porte's soil series. The urban development potential of all of these series TumerCollie�Braden Inc 4-19 is rated as severe by the USDA* (1976) because of the high corro- sivity towards uncoated steel, high shrink -swell potential, and very slow surface runoff. These soil series have a fair to good rating in their ability to sustain wildlife habitat. 4.3.5 Groundwater, The Houston -Galveston area groundwater is supplied by two major aquifer systems, the Chicot and Evangeline. The Evangeline Aquifer System, the deeper of the two, recharges in northern Montgomery and San Jacinto counties and steadily increases in depth towards the Gulf. The Chicot Aquifer System recharge area is in northern Harris and Liberty counties. In the vicinity of La Porte, the base of the Chicot Aquifer is at an approximate elevation of -600 feet msl. The Chicot Aquifer is the major source of groundwater in the La Porte area because of the depth and salinity of the Evangeline Aquiver (Gabrysch, 1980; Gabrysch, 1977). Prior to 1977, the water level in the Chicot Aquifer experienced a precipitous decline, as shown on Exhibit 24. Since 1977, at about the time the Ship Channel Industries switched to surface water supply, the Chicot Aquifer water level has increased approximately 80 feet in the La Porte area (Exhibit 25). Similar changes over time have been experienced in the Evangeline *United States Department of Agriculture, 1976. Soil Survey of Harris County, Texas. USDA, Soil and Conservation Service, Washington, DC. TumerCollie�Braden Inc } e B \ e � 44 a@ a \f) �! \ - )§/®j]j >I\ / as ƒ= R= am as a= to ]) ¥a /� \ \ \� \no _/ rn 2) 3 `a § \ e2 E4 = ;i� > /)$4 ±_ CL_ rum.n ,,,, ___, \ )\ƒ) / I I 1 1 to [k 8 ] \ / \ ] )ƒ ___ cocoa - 4 /)/)\ Ln \ ƒ 2 / \ £ W _ _ )o()3 . . . \ 2Glt u $4 » & / / # § G{{))\ 2 u u u u o G z «_/°u + )§(\\\ £3k u A G] G g G 3 ffff/\ f § " \ ) 4-21 Aquifer as shown on Exhibits 26 and 27. The significance of these water level fluctuations is discussed in paragraph 4.3.6. Subsidence and Ground Faults An important geological aspect of the La Porte area, from a planning perspective, is land surface Subsidence. This is due to the fact that areas which were previously located above storm surge levels became subjected to flooding problems follow- ing subsidence, and _in fact, some low areas became permanently submerged. Between 1906 and 1978 (Exhibit 28), the La Porte area subsided approximately 5 to 6 feet. The land surface subsidence between 1973 and 1978 was approximately 0.5 to 1 foot (Gabrysch, 1980). Bore hole extensometer data at two monitoring stations in the vicinity of La Porte indicates that the rate of subsidence has decreased since 1977. This is primarily due to the switch from groundwater to surface water supply for the industries along the Houston Ship Channel (H-GAC, 1983). Another aspect of the crustal geology which should be noted is faulting. The available data indicates that there is one active surface fault in the La Porte area. This fault follows an approximate north -south orientation and is located to the west of Big Island Slough (Fisher et, al, 1972; Rice Center, 1976; TSGLO, 1976). 4.3.7 Drainage The City of La Porte contains 15 watersheds which all drain into Galveston Ray. Principle drainage channels include TumerCollie c�Bradenlnc 4-22 Little Cedar Bayou F216-00-00 and Big Island Slough B106-00-00. These two channels drain approximately 4,700 acres, which repre- sent approximately 45 percent of the total land area within the city limits. The remaining area is drained by smaller channels, of which the principal are A104-07-00 (1,120 acres), F212-00-00 (670 acres), and F101-00-00 (1,240 acres). In addition, the City has approximately 834 acres of submerged land within the city limits. These bodies of water are located north of SH 225 and include Spillman's Island. This area is a product of the dredging from the Houston Ship Channel and Barbours Cut facility and is subject to flooding under storm conditions. 4.3.8 Flooding Because of its low elevation, flat topography, and proximity to Galveston Bay, La Porte has experienced flooding problems in the past. According to the Federal Emergency Manage- ment Agency (FEMA) (HUD, 1975), extensive areas of the City of La Porte lie within the 100-year flood plain. This is especially true of the areas of the City adjacent to Lower San Jacinto Bay and Galveston Bay. Areas immediately adjacent to Little Cedar Bayou were also determined to be within the 100-year floodplain (HUD, 1975). These areas were defined in FEMA's 1976 Flood Insurance Maps and have been recently revised by both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and FEMA. The results of this revision are shown in Exhibit 29. At the request of City staff and on the basis that this preliminary study has not been contested, TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 4-23 these results have been used as the basis for related planning 1-1 recommendations in the Master an. 4.3.9 Vegetation and Fauna La Porte lies within a vegetational region of Texas known as the Gulf Prairies and Marshes Area, as shown on Exhibit 30 (Correll and Johnston, 100je The southeastern portion of Harris County has been defined as Bluestem Prairie (Rice Center, 1976). The climax vegetation of the region is primarily grass- land, with the native grasses being bluestems (Andropogon sp.), gamagrass (Tripsacum sp.), and Panicum sp. Invading grasses include carpetgrass (Axonopus affinis), Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), ragweed (Ambrosia sp.), and Yankee weed (Eupatorium compositifolium). However, much of the La Porte area has been urbanized and, as such, the native flora has been replaced with a variety of ornamental species. The native fauna of the original prairies have largely been replaced by species which can tolerate urbanized conditions. 4.3.10 Rare and Endangered Species Several endangered faunal species maintain or have maintained resident populations in the upper Texas coastal region. The absence of a particular species is difficult to prove due to many factors which influence the life cycle of the species. However, available information (TSGLO, 1976, Rice Center, 1976, TDPW, 1975) indicates that the known ranges of the endangered species in Harris County do not include the La Porte area. TurnerCollie�cSBraden Inc 4-24 4.3.11 Areas of Environmental Concern Several areas of environmental concern along the Texas Gulf Coast have been outlined in the La Porte area by various agencies (Exhibit 31). These include (TSGLO, 1976): 1. All lands of the upper coast east of Brazoria and Fort Bend counties (Texas Forest Service). 2. Houston Air Quality Maintenance Area (Texas Air Control Board). 3. Section 208 Area (Texas Department of Water Resources). 4. Septic tank and other private sewage treatment facility Board Order area (Texas Department of Water Resources). 5. All watercourses on uplands and all coastal waters to a depth of 30 feet (Texas Historical Commission) due to the fact that all prehistoric and historic cultures generally have developed adjacent or in proximity to watercourses (food and transport). Some particular areas of concern as outlined by the General Land Office (Exhibit 32) include: 1. Active floodplains and poorly drained areas. 2. Areas of hurricane tidal flooding. 3. Oyster reefs. 4. Grass flats. 5. Tidal marshes and creeks. 4.3.11 Transportation The City of La Porte is served within its city limits by approximately 252,650 linear feet of thoroughfares. These thoroughfares are maintained by the City, Harris County, TumerCollie c�jBradenlnc 4-25 and the State of Texas. Table 40 provides a summary of these by each of the agencies responsible for their maintenance. Exhibit 33 depicts these thoroughfares showing xight-of-way sections and the latest daily traffic volumes. Table 41 presents a detailed description of the principal thoroughfares summarized in Table 40 and depicted on Exhibit 33. It is important to note that 76 percent of La Porte's thoroughfares today are maintained and improved either by Harris County or the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. Also, daily traffic volumes are generally low and do not indicate a high level of congestion, although specific thoroughfares such as 16th Street, Harbours Cut Blvd., Sens Road, Main Street, and Broadway occasionally are subject to congestion by trucks. The City of La Porte is served by rail facilities within the city limits which include Southern Pacifies railroad yard and two railroad lines; the first parallel and adjacent to SH 225 and the second parallel to SH 146 between Sens Road and 16th Street. These facilities have an important impact on land - use distribution patterns within La Porte and provide both oppor- tunities and constraints to the City's future development. In addition, the City of La Porte owns a general aviation airport which serves the needs of smaller aircraft in the southeastern part of Harris County. This facility presently attracts predominantly single -engine and light twin aircraft activity. One hundred sixty-five aircraft are presently based TurnerCollie�cSBraden Inc TABLE 40 - TRANSPORTATION EXISTING THOROI East-W�st North -South 1C7TAL City (l.f.) 35,250 (14%) 25,550 (10%) 60,800 (24%) County State (l.f.) (l.f.) 93,550 (37%) 26,150 (10%) 40,750 (16%) 31,400 (13%) 134,300 (53%) 57,550 (23%) Total (l.f.) 154,950 (61%) 97,700 (39%) 252,650 (100%) TumerCollie(cSBnden lnc TABLE 41 - TRANSPORTATION EXISTING THOROUGHFARES Principal Desig- Length ROW Thoroughfares nation (l.f.) (l.f.) East-W st SH-225 State 20,000 350 Old La Porte Road North P Street North L Street North H Street Spencer Highway tst Main Street East Main Street Barbours Cut Blvd Fairmont Parkway Wharton Weems North -South Underwood Farrington City City County County County County State 20,500 14,750 14,750 10,000 2,700 25,500 2,900 County 3,350 100 County 8,500 80 County 25,500 263 3,250 100 State 3,250 100 County City 19,000 3,600 1,500 4-lane divided (proposed 8-lane divided highway). 2-lane minor segments. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 4-lane asphalt/open ditch. 4-lane asphalt/concrete curb and gutter. 4-lane asphalt/open ditch. 4-lane asphalt/concrete curb and gutter. 4-lane divided (proposed 8-lane divided). 4-lane divided/concrete curb and gutter. 4-lane divided/concrete curb and gutter. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane asphalt/concrete curb and gutter. TumerCollie�Br�den Inc TABLE 41 (Cont'd) Principal Thoroughfares North -South (Cont'd) Farrington F3ay Area Blvd. 16th Street SH-146 Broadway Oesig- length ROW nation (l.f.) (l.f.) Lanes County 4,750 150 (min.) 8,750 60 County 8,250 60 City 10,200 60 State 19,000 350 State 12,400 100 City 5,750 100 4-lane divided/asphalt/ concrete curb and gutter. Proposed 4-lane divided/ concrete curb and gutter. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane concrete. 8-line divided highway. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. 2-lane asphalt/open ditch. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 4-29 at La Porte Municipal Airport, producing with itinerant users approximately 125,000 annual operations. The airport has both a primary and crosswind runway. The primary is a 3,500-foot x 75-foot runway (12-30) and the crosswind is 3,000 feet x 75 feet (4-22); both are asphalt runways. Both runways have medium - intensity runway lighting and are served by full-length taxiways. The airport's landside facilities include five conventional and approximately 35 T-hangars, and four fixed -base operations. The airport is currently located on a 298-acre parcel near the center of the City. 4.3.12 Land Use A combination of methods was used to determine La Porte's existing land use. These included: o previously published information, o multiple field visits, support information provided by the City staff, and o reconnaissance of aerial photography. Land uses were classified into the following groupings: o Residential uses, which included: Rural residential, which was defined as single- family dwellings within tracts of land of 1 acre or more, Single-family residential, - Multifamily residential, defined as more than two dwelling units within a single lot, and Transient residential, which encompassed trailer parks, motels, and hotels. TumerCollie�Bracien Inc 4-30 - o Industrial use, which included light and heavy industry, warehousing, and container facilities. o Commercial uses, which included retail and office space. o Public uses, which included all facilities dedi- cated to serving the general public, whether public or private. o Open space, which included parks and recreational facilities. o Public rights -of -way, which included all utility and thoroughfare ROW. o Airport and railyard areas. o Water areas. o Vacant land, which were lands not used or charac- terized by any of the above classifications. Exhibit 34 depicts the existing arrangement of land uses within La Porte as well as .four planning areas which were established for the purpose of analysis. Table 42 provides a detailed breakdown of the existing land use by planning area. Residential land uses are predominant in La Porte, accounting for approximately 42 percent of La Porte's developable area. Following in importance are vacant areas which represent approximately 36 percent of the City's developable area. Rights - of -way represent the third most important land use with approxi- mately 10 percent of the City's developable area. All other uses contribute to the remaining 12 percent. It is important to note that 43 percent of these residential areas is classified as rural and these sparsely populated areas, together with the vacant areas TumerCollie(cf Braden lnc TABLE 42 - EXISTING LAND USE Total City Area Total City Water Area Airport Areas TOTAL EEVELOPABLE AREA Vacant Area Industrial Cawercial Public Uses Open Space Residential Rural Single -Family Multifamily Transient ROW Railyard Area 1= SUBAREAS Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 11,188 834 298 10,056 278 1,518 580 1,343 3,719 51 212 62 21 346 117 45 13 10 185 132 — 29 51 212 48 — 9 23 80 — — 1,896 7 1,903 913 65 80 1,241 2,299 28 — — 10 38 4 35 29 76 144 133 276 501 182 1,092 — 38 — — 38 1,704 2,189 3,199 2;964 10,056 TumerCollie c�Bradenlnc 4-32 of La Porte, constitute vacant areas of La Porte approximately 55 percent of the developable an within the city limits. Each of the planning areas defined in the existing land -use map (Exhibit 34) is distinctly different from a land use point of view. A brief discussion of each is presented below. o Area 1 - Area 1 is the old city core and is adja- cent to the bay. It is primarily a single-family residential area but in it are concentrated the majority of the multifamily, commercial, public, and open space uses of the City. Vacant areas represent only 12 percent of its total area. o Area 2 - Area 2 is primarily vacant (70 percent). In it the major use is industry, which accounts for 61 percent of the total industrial use within the city limits. Primary reasons for the circum- stances of this area are that: - the area is restricted by two ROW corridors, SH 146 and the utilities corridor formed by Southern Pacific's rail line, major pipelines serving the industrial areas to the north and south of the City, and Houston Lighting & Power transmission lines, a major portion of the southern part of the area fell, until recently, within a 100-year flood - plain, and property ownership in the area is such that there are major parcels owned by few individuals who are probably holding land for future development. o Area 3 - Area 3 is primarily a rural area. Vacant and rural residential uses make up 78 percent of its total area. This area is adjacent to Deer Park and has experienced increased single-family resi- dential development activity in the last few years. o Area 4 - Area 4 is made up primarily of single- family residential areas and vacant land. It is the area that is experiencing the fastest growth in La Porte. Area residents depend heavily on TumerCollie�Braden Inc 4-33 close -by Deer Park public and commercial facilities since the area is not very well served by these types of facilities, as can be evidenced by the very small percentage that these land uses repre- sent from the City's overall land use in the commercial and public use categories. Recognizing that land -use patterns in La Porte are not always consistent, it can be stated -in general that land -use patterns in La Porte are as follows: o Residential areas concentrate in primarily three principal areas --along the bay front, the old city core, and the new area along Fairmont Parkway. o Commercial areas concentrate in the old core of the City, primarily along Main Street, Broadway, and SH 146. o Industrial facilities locate between SH 146 and Southern Pacific's railroad line and north of Barbours Cut Blvd. o Public and open space uses are scattered through- out the City, with an important concentration in the older part of the City. o Vacant areas dominate in every part of the City, with the exception of the old city core. o Rural uses dominate in the northwestern part of the City. The housing population density map presented in Exhibit 35 con- firm the latter analysis and illustrates more specifically the distribution of population and the intensity of development within the City. Furthermore, this exhibit helps understand La Porte's development. La Porte developed in two phases; the first estab- lished the older city core and the second resulted from a "spill- over" effect from Deer Park and Pasadena which, in turn, exhibits TumerCollie(cSBndenlnc 4-34 two different lifestyles --one rural and the other suburban. A third development phase, of a suburban nature, is beginning to take root in the Lomax area where 5- and 10-acre tracts are being subdivided into single-family dwellings continually. Areas of concern for future_planning are: o the neighborhood and commercial areas south of Barbours Cut Blvd. which are suffering deteriora- tion due to the influx of industrial and storage type facilities; o the vacant areas south of Little Cedar Bayou, which will not be as severely limited by flood - plain restrictions in the future; o the bay front, which has been forgotten in recent years and is possibly La Porte's principal attraction; the lack of retail development and community services throughout the City; uncontrolled industrial expansion within the city limits; and o the lack of recreational amenities throughout the City. 4.3.13 Utilities The City of La Porte is served by the following utility systems: o Water Supply and Distribution o Wastewater Collection and Treatment o Stormwater Drainage o Solid Waste Disposal o Electrical Supply and Distribution o Gas Supply and Distribution In addition, the City of La Porte is crossed by numerous pipeline corridors which, together with the ROW used by the existing TumerCollie(cSBr�den Inc 4-35 utility systems, have an impact on planning decisions regarding the Comprehensive Plan. The City of La Porte has contracted recently with consultants for the evaluation and appraisal of the following systems. o Water Supply and Distribution: Turner Collie & Braden Inc. 1983 Feasibility Study for Long -Range Potable Water Supply (This study was through the La Porte Area Water Authority but funded by the City of La Porte.) o Wastewater Collection and Treatment:. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. 1983 Comprehensive Wastewater Collec- tion and Treatment Plan o Stormwater Drainage: O'Malley and Clay, Inc. 1982 Master Drainage Plan o Solid Waste Disposal: HDR Techserv, Znc. 1983 Solid Waste Disposal Plan In each of these reports a detailed assessment of the existing condition of the system in question is discussed; it is recommended that the reader refer to each report for detailed information. Exhibits 36 through 39 describe the location of each of the components of the respective system. Detailed assessments of the existing conditions of the gas and electrical systems is not considered within the scope of this report other than reporting the following conversations with Entex and HL&P representatives. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 4-36 Regarding the Electrical Supply and Distribution System serving La Porte, the system was described as more than adequate by HUP representatives and it was indicated to the consultant team that additional information beyond the location of the system components would not be disclosed. Regarding the Gas Supply and Distribution Systems serving La Porte, the system was described as adequate given current demand. Expansion of the system would be dependent on future demand and resource allocation policy. Recommendations by representatives of Entex included ROW provisions for future expansion within existing and proposed thoroughfare ROW and - coordination with Entex on the part of the City in order to define future needs. TumerC011ie c�$Br�den Inc Ad IF M, A Vied Ad al MIN Ill I y ti Rf * fi -, SQL Sk'>tz1$zl,,it u ...r x�'iori;s`} y�,'},� .� I 1. . i t do ALL 01 Ss .,did ac 5 t ux>M t :. t ^`"�' = `� °}� AMAILL zk c t �tr yix'I. i- sus r 3H,�' � �.& :FANAd _, t t `Fy a"`. tt e .ri "� �•`�' s,:�F 3` 1 d t 4Pr�VIIy,�MAI j`rAt v t- C 1 An N i } n,,PAeSNG -r I'd IF as rK,+- +(�+.T ;R °r.�,,, AIF its. , "mo w ILL L-V FIN If IF yKCf d° ?AA L Jr.,t2: Jac "N:' --t }3..3 4 V '? by -i Fff j•� i } 1 IF 'LlIF 11 An A rd f 1 In Im- An 14 A Al IF NA I I In M Ad a-- { r < }I An xa or AT 11 y, uia 4 LLr ; .Fl A Ad .I -I rV &- a a:. _ a FL.. ,t 4K - x s - r sYIF Lr Vt i r �a t a SFr I AM A III -Fit I yr t t w t 1 - p r `F^s Ad L IF 7 z FAd I p { r {' t r# _itJ - .. .. ••• •�. v �nivviv U. I-1tIVFi Y �^ � �/ S O C I A T E S NORTH SCALE IN FEET r—^— iA UNPIN s., ,.. PIT 'TAI Ile I {, t. + PAN,+ + 1 • -- —— _ PAY— �. }} mIAT All, ---• I I �_ .to AT ANNA u _ Ae — r -( 3 — j� _ ;It III IT A I f1. .I I ` --- --- --- _. - - - - --, % TOPOGRAPHY 1, ....... I _ \•4 i 1 5 CONTOUR ELEVATIONS + r jl -- _ 'Ca F ITI�. 111 ITT ITANT IT At i Y — 1 _06 i R - _ - - -'- EXHIBIT 0 1300 3000 LA RTE COMPREHENSIVETumerCollie B PLAN ® �o radenlnc IN ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET i DELTAIC PLAIN ASH SEDIMENTS SOURCE: RICE CENTER REGIONAL GEOLOGY • BRAZOS DELTAIC PLAIN • TRINITY DELTAIC PLAIN • ALLUVIAL & DELTAIC PLAIN SEDIMENTS • INTER DELTAIC PLAIN MARSH SEDIMENTS • SMITH POINT BARRIER LA ORE �O EXHIBIT Turner MPR HENSIVE ILL Collie Braden Inc IN AGGOCI.T,o„ WITH L W F W ® 21 INC.C. VERNON+/ERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SOURCE: SOIL SURVEY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT GENERAL SOILS ® NEARLY LEVEL, CLAYEY AND LOAMY PRAIRIE SOILS NEARLY LEVEL, LOAMY PRAIRIE SOILS ® NEARLY LEVEL TO GENTLY SLOPING, LOAMY FOREST SOILS © NEARLY LEVEL, FORESTED BOTTOM LAND SOILS LA . PORTE COMPR EHE EXHIBIT Tumor NSIVE CLAN ® 22 CollleeBradenInc IN •SSOCIATIO„ WIT„ LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH 7 UPPER s.......5 r.. 16 4 1 r�— Fa _ 4 y W ,.a. 3 2 I 12 l - 13 - ----- e.' .--'......, - OILS MAP - - --- -_ ,I I • � 1. Md - Midland S Ity Clay Loam �} 2. Be - Bernard -Edna Complex r = 1 : _ 3. LcA - Lake Charles Clay, 0 1%Slopes --- --- - _. �.; 3 10 4. Bd - Bernard Clay Loam �- 5 Is Ilam Sods :/ —_ _—_J 9 - if l6. HIS - Harris Clay 9 9 I 8. Am - Aldine Very andine Sandy Loam 9. 9. Ba - Beaumont Clay . 'i1 1 _ 10. VaB - Vamont Clay, 1-4%Slopes 11. Bc - Beaumont - Urban Land Complex : 11 12. Bg - Bernard- Urban Land Complex �l 19 �--------- - --- _ 13. Lu —Lake Charles- Urban Land Complex t nd Complex 9 15. Ur - Urban Land Complex -,- 16. An - Aldine - Urban Land Complex • _ 17 _ Ad - V Addicks Loam 4 -_ -_- -_-_-_ - ,.A -_ - --.I� � 18. VaA- Vamont Clay, O-1%Slopes L A ORTE COMPREHENSIVE E%HIBIT TumerColll 23 e� Braden Inc,.Inc. IN ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALEINFEET SOURCE: DEV ELOPMENT OF GROUNDWATER IN THE HOUSTON DISTRICT, TEXAS 1970 - 1974 REPORT 241 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES WATER LEVEL DECLINE IN THE CHICOT AQUIFER 1970-1974 LINE OF EQUAL WATER - LEVEL DECLINE IN FEET LA PORTE COMPR .HENSIVE P A EXHIBIT rumr N ® 24 e Collie c( Bradenlnc ,N ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SOURCE: SUBSIDENCE 83 HARRIS�GALVESTON COASTAL SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT WATER LEVEL CHANGES IN THE CHICOT AQUIFER 1977-1983 Q':�� LA . PORTE C OMPREHENSIVE LAN TumerColhec�Bradenlnc,N A99�L,AT,ON W,TH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES LINE OF EQUAL WATER- LEV EL CHANGE IN FEET NORTH E %MIBIT 25 0 LA .PORTS CO ' T MPR HENSIVE umerColliec�Br�clenlnc. I„ .sso�,�T,o„ W,T„ LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & A SOURCE: DEVELOPMENT OF GROUNDWATER IN THE HOUSTON DISTRICT, TEXAS 1970 - 1974 REPORT 241 TEXAS D EPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES WATER LEVEL DECLINE IN THE EVANGELINE AQUIFER 1970-1974 —�- i0o r"' � LINE OF EOUAL WATER - LEVEL DECLINE IN FEET NORTH E %HIBIT 26 LA . PORTE Tume\ COMPR HE r \rollleeBraden Intw IN ASSOCIATION WITH N I LWFW INC. VERNON G.. HENRYH& SOURCE: SUBSIDENCE 83 HARRISGALVESTON COASTAL SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT, WATER LEVEL CHANGES IN THE EVANGELINE AQUIFER 1977-1983 LINE OF EQUAL WATER- LEVELCHANGEINFEET ® E�IBIT 7 NORTH SOURCE: SUBSIDENCE 83 HARRISGALVESTON COASTAL SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT. LAND SURFACE SUBSIDENCE 1906-1978 __ 4_0__ LINE OF EQUAL LAND- SURFACESUBSIDENCE LA . ORTE COMPR HENSIVE ILL EXHIBIT TumerCollie Brad In A N ® Z8 en C. „.,..�,,,,.„ w,T„ LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH ! } {TA885 TAT y� - AAA } t\_ } .4 AAA %LL NN -.- I - �\�` T I AAA mL �r - BARIMITIP5 CUT t �,, p,n N / � I- � ,4` � .n::EStcN aar '! — _. —1 - - FLOOD PLAIN MAP I FLOOD PLAIN FLODOWAYBOUNDARY + / - _ OB Y �\ ._ _ _ — i-_ _ —_- _ t ��� YEAR FLOOOPLAIN BOUNDARY rr ----- — ! �,IF SW YEAR FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY 1--IF ---_— FAA -AAA A - f f .! F V \ AA PAR I LA EXHIBIT TumerCollie B ®D� 29 �� Pen IN ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET La Porte VEGETATIONAL AREAS i. PINEY WOO DS 2. GULF PRAIRIES AND MARSHES 3. POS70AK SAVANNAH 4. BLAC KLAN D PRAIR I ES 5. CROSS TIMBERS AND PRAIRIES 6. SOUTH TEXAS PLAINS 7. EOWARDSPLATEAU 8. ROLLING PLAINS 9. HIGH PLAINS 10. TRANS-PECOS, MOUNTAINS AND BASINS LA . ORTE COMPR 'HE EXHIBIT Tume NSIVE CLAN ® 30 rCollle ira�enlnc ,„ ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY ASSOCIATES NORTH - SOURCE: GENERAL LAND OFFICE 'COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AREAS OF GENERALIZED STATE CONCERN "SECTION 208 AREAS" AIR QUALITY AREAS / TWQB ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED IN AREA (SEPTIC TANKS AND / PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEMS) �.A T . PORTS COMPRE E%H16T �IENSIVE PLAN 31 ® umerColhe�Br�d�nInc. IN ASSOCIATION WITH LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH 'SOURCE: GENERAL LAND OFFICE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AREAS OF PARTICULAR STATE CONCERN ® ACTIVE FLOOD PLAINS AND POORLY DRAINED AREAS HURRICANE TIDAL FLOODING aOYSTER REEF AREAS aGRASS FLATS TIDAL MARSH AND TIDAL CREEKS �aPO EXHIBIT RTE COMP Tumor Colhe c�SBraaen Inc. , N. s s o R E FI E N S I V E PLAN CIATION WITH LWFW INC. ® 32 VERNONERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SAY r I rr I I / •l ����.�_-- 11 �`� -__ .S/_� %o` Sees est. t _ mcp 'Alr Cam, \ 1 b oon 35p f - - i —y' - \ `— ...n% - YY Of Y 6� - ion ... _ YY No '— Sole on `SLo o of Y --ley_. o Yo o - _ _ _ ._ m -� "--- i �` 3Sp 1 - _ 00 too �..of Yo, _ ` •_ _ . yam. - O B0 c 1 � (300 ) — O loot, vo- 1 or it N_- \ t 90 �' w. (1200) - _ _ _ ^ Z 60: 80 80 — - — j� - - - - o o� 0) l co) E .� d - 0 `-- E o _ - - E _ o I na c too gs to- 108 S� — EI}Rq - 100 INININNIINYNNNNiNN1 — I sco - - �. - eal it ro i — / 4 or. I or tlool Aw ' 1 1 i--v O T 6 _ __ W ...... _ ! 1 100 00 THOROUGHFARE 263 In If (sbo _ RIGHTS OF WAY 263 - mut�� 2r�1)� _ _ ,. AND TRAFFIC MAP IF \_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII STATE THOROUGHFARES -.�- - luuluumm cou„T. THceouc„rAREs — — — — --= — — — o CITY THOROUGHFARES o� ;j — —o (6300) RAEE«p UNTS — — m 350 RIGHT aR_wgv s[Ciiory _ i J_i 100 ,l i (2a0o> So 0. loll �o �EXHIBITLARTE COMPREHENSIVE �33 TumerCollie Bradenlnc IN AS S 0p IA T10„ w,TH L W F W INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET 'ASa5 BAT IN IN T INN, IN �3 ---I TnA TNtt Iq Ia IN LA own ww E i �NVEST.� SAY i In _...._ — \ i EXISTING LAND USE jr — _ s RURAL RESIDENTIAL _ _ 'I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL = 'I MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL r-------_--- -- TRANSIENT e RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL \� 11 ---• - INDUSTRIAL _ _ o PUSL CUSE OPEN SPACE No Iv WT � RA LYARD VACANT AREAS Tft L ♦\ — — — — — LA P EXHIBIT ORTE COMPRE ENSIVE PLAN ®D� 34 TumerColliecEBraden Inc IN ASSOCIATION w1T„ LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET BIT 5 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 BIT 6 Vl f: V �J V IlJ � /'1 � G l7 NORTH SCALE IN FEET IBIT 1 n�nin �c;w�e iry rEEr �1 , r I _ 1 -- _ I _ - - Mil If I ps r - oa - - `. -1 H - _.__ • - m - - EXISTING STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM I ' I � �i , - _- I._._. -- + L q/� / �•••� EXISTING DRAINAGE CHANNELS - - - - - - - - --- - %. < r I ` Ploi mnHDP a .C.D. STREAM DESIGNATION IF I I + RTE �011ie COMp REHE 0 500 3000 EXHIBIT L W F W Bradenlnc. IN ASS DC IATI0N WI NSI VE INC. VERNON G. LAN ® 38 HENRY& ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET IN �xANte/ ..a of .UNIT �Tox x.E. = 1jr p-mmuFFNA.°°�ll 'C.� - _. l` .``` - I, �., ` j�IN .ee- NAN FUEL IN PLACCURNALGAINIA NIC III Net Cot 110 IF SIR- EVER GIL Cli To eg in mi :. ... _ r wco� Its''� /.� _AA._ d LINER _ A� x -y ♦vNA"ono 1 ; 'Ar Col "All F14940" -- —. _ — Ner INNI AN Fell Alle AN, Ali NA. t .fI / IF IOWOPRyr .6� ,EV». V3yrunuwsuE>j i; PoWEPS wT� z:ax I - •mliff Fr1'� ♦♦ 3ZPIP � {1 WWWWjii'�N: »». 4 -tooffs\left, •AFeetAC ♦♦♦♦•I I =NAN _.w •x T`—xx ra,R�" I I�� vno `� .l ter'. - sE.o,.� J INN I, imu It IT f ENCI US �ILV x. _ .� IN I Feel lFewilAig e / `. ~jam i ' -- -- i� t NI I A SIR JOIN A At AN NA FIT movirl Sol MEN A Fel It 444 it IN AS 9 It IN L 1A / IN IN. - t .I I }[ It sit' I I FAR Re IIIE- Ie IN rI:F 11' I _ / \We rE ly 1 1 j _ C - IF i I t� n.w« x .xo olE " ISTING ELECTRICAL At =`I Ai.' �_, W y , _ .__-------,_ `i `/DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND PIPELINES 1 . 1-� 0 // i _ f •- 'I _. xx I it / ,E.ET ALLINE • rE,TMilr.ExE ,xl _ \ ,:,::r:r»»:::. TRANSMISSION LINE P.O.W. .Nri� \ -.-�� .-._.-.- oTE vwEVE SITE a ucc E f . x.ox cx la+ E^ ca.l Q� E L �_ x����. MINOR PIPELINE P.O.W. _'Ii/ �P-���''` TT -I _—.- �.: MAJOR PIPELINE NOW, -••••^ i, _---------------- -- •: ?I - O''I'-. IG .; EXISTNG FACILITIES '•I1 ; r 1, B 0�� �. - �J� L� PROPOSED FACILITIES I r_— it :y Ale _�_—_—I _—_ l—'I RIC AN E'•, I a — ' IN- --- - V E EXHIBIT RTE COMPREHENS IVE PLAN®9 L G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET TumerCollie BradenInc. IN ASSOCIATION WITH L W F W I IJ VERNON R COMPREHENSIVEPLAN DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Environmental Analysis 5.2 Planning Issues and Alternatives 5.3 Final Development Approach IF IF I IF ,: l '� .t IF "' Ft SECTION 5.0 - MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES This Comprehensive Plan has been composed of many areas 5-1 of analysis and cons marketing, physical, environmental, financial, and perhaps most important, City goals and objectives. The Master Plan resulting from this action transfers all of these factors into a specific development plan. In preparing the recommended Master Plan for La Porte's ultimate development presented in Section 1.0 of this report, several development concepts and issues were considered. This is a review of these alternatives. The Comprehensive Plan includes all areas of analysis, public opinion, economic, financial, and environmental, and is .the framework for policy and decision making in which general goals and objectives to be achieved are set. The Master Plan translates the policy statement into specific proposals by defining through each of its components the principles, standards, and specific actions that will ultimately achieve the goals and objectives defined in the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of this section of the La Porte Comprehensive Plan report is to provide an under- standing of the planning analysis that led to the Master Plan. 5.1 Environmental Analysis Two areas of analysis were developed concurrently in this planning effort --the economic environment analysis and the physical environment analysis. Each of these areas provided specific decision -making constraints and opportunities. These TumerCollie�Braden lnc 5-2 have been discussed in Sections 3 and 4 of this report. In this part of the report we will bring together the principal elements of Sections 3 and 4 that had an effect on the Comprehensive Plan's goals and objectives, and consequently on the Master Plan process and development. The economic environment analysis, together with La Porte's goals and objectives in its future economic development, contrib- uted to the identification of La Porte's market opportunities and economic development prospects, which resulted ultimately in a projected land -use mix for the City. This projected land -use mix is one of the key parameters in the development of the Master Plan since it establishes La Porte's potential future development in terms of specific acreage targets by each of the major land -use classifications. The physical environment analysis (part 4.3) contributed to the identification of La Porte's physical development constraints. These development constraints are brought together in the resistance -to -change map (Exhibit 41) and development obstacles map (Exhibit 42). The resistance -to -change map shown on Exhibit 4 establishes for each of the City areas the degree to which the areas will be susceptible to change in land use in the future. The map unifies the conditions established in the existing land use (Exhibit 34) and the property ownership distribution of La Porte (Exhibit 40) TumerCollie�Bracien lnc 5-3 by interpreting each of the map relationships and impacts on future development. Property ownership patterns have an impact on the resistance to change of land use. Generally, the more subdivided an area and the more property owners it has, the higher its resistance to change$ conversely, the less subdivided an area and the fewer property owners it has, the lower its resistance to change. Property ownership in La Porte has been classified as: o Public property, which includes state, county, and Port Authority or City -owned land. o Principal undeveloped parcels, which include major private tracts of land (+100 acres) that are currently undeveloped. o Sparsely subdivided areas, which include those areas in which the majority of the lots are larger than 5 acres. o Moderately subdivided areas, which include the areas in which the majority of the lots are between 1 and 5 acres. o Highly subdivided areas, which include the areas in which the majority of the lots are smaller than 1 acre. o Utility and thoroughfare rights -of -way. As can be seen from Exhibit 40, the areas which are highly sub- divided correspond to residential neighborhoods and the older commercial areas of La Porte. These areas will by the nature of their use and property ownership pattern tend to be highly resistant to change. Areas that are moderately subdivided are generally adjacent to the western portion of SH 146 and the eastern and southern portions of Lomax. These areas are either industrial, rural TurnerCollie(cSBiadenlnc 5-4 residential, commercial, or vacant. Industrial areas will tend to have a higher resistance to change than the rural residential and commercial properties. Areas that are sparsely subdivided are primarily in the Lomax area, which is a rural residential area. Resistance to change in this area is expected to be moderate initially but over time it will decrease considerably, given current and future development pressures. Principal undeveloped properties, in La Porte are generally vacant and will play an important role in La Porte's future development. Major parcels include: o Southern Pacifies properties adjacent to SH 225.and Underwood Street and SH 225 and SH 146. o PP&G's property between Fairmont Parkway and Spencer Highway. o Warton Weems Estate properties south of Little Cedar Bayou between SH 146 and Broadway. o Eighty-one Limited's properties south of Fairmont Parkway and west of SH 146. o The Carter Trust properties north of Fairmont Parkway between Sens Road and Southern Pacifies railroad line. These parcels are considered to have a low resistance to change similar to vacant land. The resistance -to -change map shown on Exhibit 41 basically reflects the latter discussion. Areas have been classified with: o Very high resistance to change. These areas include major utility and thoroughfare rights -of -way, public uses, open space, and heavy industrial installations. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 5-5 High resistance to change. These areas include primarily single-family residential neighborhoods. o Moderate resistance to change. These areas include commercial, light industrial, and multifamily residential uses and trailer parks. o Low resistance to change. These areas include rural residential areas and vacant land. The development obstacles map shown on Exhibit 42 identifies elements and aspects of specific areas which have an impact on development and which the Master Plan must address. The existence of these obstacles provides both opportunities and constraints to La Porte's development --the obstacles identified are: o Areas restricted by sewer capacity, which primarily include: the older portion of La Porte between the bay and SH 146 north of Fairmont Parkway and the areas north of Spencer Highway between Underwood Street and Southern Pacific's north -south railroad line. o Areas restricted by water capacity, which include the newly annexed Spenwick/College View area, WO the Lomax area, and MW the southernmost portion of La Porte adjacent to Shore Acres. o Areas restricted by water and sewer capacity, which consist primarily of the Lomax area. o Areas within the flood plain, which include the areas adjacent to Little Cedar Bayou_and Big Island slough and the areas north of SH 225 adjacent to the ship channel. TumerCollie�c$Br�den Inc 5-6 a Land -use obstacles include the airport, Southern Pacific's railyard, and the industrial areas to the north and south of La Porte which act as boundaries to the City. o Thoroughfare rights -of -way, which include SH 146, SH 225, and Fairmont Parkway. e Utilities ROW, which include electrical transmission rights -of -way and drainage easement rights -of -way. o Railroad ROW, which bound SH 225 and cross the City in a north -south direction parallel to SH 146. c Pipeline ROW, which generally cut the City in a north -south direction. o Jurisdictional limits with other cities, which impede the City's continued physical growth. It is important to note the following considerations regard- ing the development obstacle map: o The City has reached what appears to be its ultimate land area growth in terms of jurisdictional expansion. o Rights -of -way either form boundaries or traverse the City in a north -south direction at a spacing such that they fragment the City. o The majority of the flood plain is within the developed areas of the City. o The airport's location and size establishes a barrier between the northern and southern portions of the west side of La Porte. o The Lomax area, which is under the most pressure for development, is the area with the least utility capacity. These factors, together with the factors identified by the resist- ance -to -change map, and the land -use projections brought about specific planning issues which were discussed extensively with the Steering Committee and presented to the public for opinion and TumerCollie�Braden Inc 5-7 comment in a public meeting. These issues constitute the basis for the development of conceptual Master Plan alternatives. 5.2 Planning Issues and Alternatives The planning issues considered of primary importance to La Porte's future physical development are posed in the following questions: o Where should industrial use concentrate in La Porte? o To what extent should La Porte strive for Citywide unity? o How should retail develop in La Porte? o How should the bay front be developed? o What should La Porte's development pace be, given the relationship between housing density and growth? Alternatives to each of the issues were considered by the public and the Steering Committee and are as follows: o On Industrial Location within city limits* outside of the city limits within the City's ETJ limits. within city limits, but location would be restricted for industries having a negative effect on the environ- ment and the City's development. o On City Unity retain the individual characters of each of the City's arease plan for a more uniform development so that all areas of the City are similaro provide unification through the establishment of major activity centers. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 5-8 o On Retail Development provide a single central retail area* provide decentralized retail centers* provide the maximum opportunity from retail development (typically expressed in the form of strip -like shopping). o On Bay -front Development expand public development along the bay front either through land acquisition or increased governmental participatione encourage private development through increased incentives and decreased zoning limitations. - de-emphasize. the development of the bay front by recognizing other areas of need. a On Density vs. Growth - maximize residential growth which implies maximum flexibility within the zoning ordinances limit density and growth by establishing a restrictive zoning ordinance. provide for a density mix that will allow an adequate pace of growth and a flexible zoning ordinance. Table 43 provides a summary list of the issues and the Steering Committee's and the public's reaction on which direction the Master Plan should follow. Exhibits 43 and 44 present two alternative concepts of land -use distribution based on: a Plan 1 (Exhibit 43) limited industrial development within the city limits* retaining the individual character of each of the City's areas. TumerCollie�Braeien Inc a, Ln m+ N x U) x m N N c ro ro ro a r4 •.Ci W ro ro ro w N > W roPC cc vz c r r O L E E Ey U ro E•u ro; W W W W •.� y 40 C Y4 Y4 m t c tam Uro/b t ro .0 01 01 rn'o 1J 01 b 7 O 0 0 c ri VA O a E x L: mz zoro mE ea ea c o O 1I1 a.7 Y+ c m � E N U d� ro O c 1a r•1 P ro N U r > U O i m E > 7 S4 •ri O O +1 •.i W U � •rl C vot G J-1 H ly •.l O 3 cw w ro cw ro •r a 04 tp •H+ S+ J-) ri of roO C L N ••+ c •.+ a N O v m ror Y+ !A m +J c a C U S4 w 3 Ot C7 3 •a 0 F r t4 ro C9 >1 1J C C N m ro cC >1 ❑ N 4J M i4 amo mcw NO Cl) fo E 4j ••+ 4. > X E O ro .r, >4 �aa _ .rl E C E 3 •.y C e a Ow >10 w0 N O *A ri W rl ••1 C7 N 31 U 9 PL 0 O O> Cal U L a single central retail area with decentralized retail centers to support neighborhood cohesiveness and identitys emphasis on recreational activity in locations other than the bay. - limited residential densities throughout the City. Plan 1 could be characterized as a slow growth scenario which would maintain activity and land -use patterns much as they are currently in La Porte. o Plan 2 (Exhibit 44) is based on: - expanded industrial development within city limits restricting those industries which would not meet the environmental standards set by the community. - city unification based on the development of two major activity centers linked by a retail corridor. - maximum opportunity for retail development with decentralized retail centers to support neighborhood cohesiveness and identity. - a balanced recreational activity program which would allow for bay -front development. - the provision of a density mix which would allow for growth. Plan 2 will be characterized as a faster -than -moderate growth scenario which would alter current land -use patterns inasmuch as it would increase existing use intensity. After discussions with the Steering Committee it was con - eluded that the development approach for La Porte would be based on the concepts proposed in alternative Plan 2, with the following observations: o Industrial land uses should be further contained. TumerCollie�Braden Inc A graduation in land -use intensity should always exist, particularly in the areas where residential uses are adjacent to industrial uses. Activity areas should allow for clear differentiation. This differentiation should be accomplished by the public use allocated to each area. a Recreational uses should act in support of the activity centers. 5.3 Final Development Approach Exhibit 45 establishes the final development approach which determined the recommended Master Plan. City areas are to be developed according to the following strategies: General Promotion - This strategy is applicable to all areas of the City susceptible to development. Areas designated under this strategy will follow the general recommendations set in the Comprehensive Plan. Selective Development - This strategy is applicable to specific areas which, because of their location or func- tion, play a vital role in La Porte's future development. Areas designated under this strategy will follow general recommendations set in the Comprehensive Plan but will be subject to the specific recommendations set forth in the Master Plan. Principal areas included within this strategy are the major activity centers, neighborhood centers, the retail corridor between activity centers, and key industrial and residential areas depicted in the final development approach map. Upgrade - This strategy is applicable to specific areas which are in a deteriorated or deteriorating condition and are currently not developed to their highest and best use. Maintain - This strategy is applicable to areas whose cohesiveness and quality benefit La Porte. The strategy is directed to preserve these areas throughout La Porte's development. These areas include generally residential neighborhoods. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 5-12 o Redirect - This strategy is applicable to those areas which must change dramatically in their use due to their location or current use. Principal areas affected by this strategy will be by nature industrial or residential and will generally change to residential or commercial in the case of industrial areas or industrial and commer- cial in the case of residential areas. Inventory - This strategy is applicable to areas which may be reserved for future development. None of La Porte's areas were classified for inventory under the final development approach. The development approach expressed in Exhibit 45 provides the framework from which a physical layout of all the Master Plan components can be achieved. In addition, it establishes a general philosophy that leads to specific development concepts that, once applied, will create the dynamics necessary to achieve the goals and objectives of La Porte's citizens determined in the Compre- hensive Plan. Consequently, it is through this philosophy of development where goals, objectives, economic principles, and environmental concerns are brought together in one single concep- tual directive. This directive then must be interpreted and converted into specific actions and proposals through the Master Plan. TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc IT I I. `dt MI E X F 1 .....dt `l S PL e� d -: 2'r Is IF I B i ..R IF I IF I IF 0 IF Y IF IF IF IF BIBLIOGRAPHY Urban Land Institute, 1968. The Community Builders Handbook, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC. Rowe, Peter of Franklin M. Setzer, Wayne F. Timmer, and Mark W. Mueler, 1975. Investigations in Community Facility Guidelines, Rice University, Houston, Texas. DeChiara, Joseph and Lee Koppelman, 1975. Manual of Housing/ Planning and Design Criteria, Prentice-Hall/Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Urban Land Institute, 1978. Residential Development Handbook, TnAnctrinl nava7nnment Handbook. and Retail Development Handbook, Urban Land Institute, Washington, ix:. National Recreation and Park Association, 1980. Recreation, Park, and Open Space Standards and Guidelines, National Recreation and Park Association, Washington, DC. Turner Collie & Braden Inc., 1984. Feasibility Study for Long - Range Potable Water Supply, Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas. O'Malley and Clay Inc., 1982. La Porte Master Drainage Plan, O'Malley and Clay Inc., Brenham, Texas. HDR Techsery Inc., 1983. La Porte Solid Waste Disposal Plan, HDR Techsery Inc., Houston, Texas. Turner Collie & Braden Inc., 1984. Comprehensive Wastewater Collection and Treatment Plan, Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas. Lockwood, Andrews and Newham Inc., 1982. Community Analysis of Southern Pacific Railroad Expansion Proposal, Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam Inc., Houston, Texas. Correll, D.S. and M. C. Johnston, 1970. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas, Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Texas. ' U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1975. Flood Hazard Boundary Maps. City of La Porte, Texas, HUD, FIA, Washington, DC. Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife, 1975. Texas Outdoor Recreation Proeram. The Gulf Coast Region, Region 16, TDPW, TumerCollie%SBraden lnc Gabrysch, R. K., 1980. Development of Groundwater in the Houston District, Texas, 1970-1974: Report 241, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Texas Department of Water Resources, Austin, Texas. Gabrysch, R. K., 1977. A� Chicot and Evangeline Galveston Area, Texas Areas of USGS, Washington, DC. United States Bureau of the Census, 1983. 1980 Census of Popula- tion, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1983. Climatological Data, Texas, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Asheville, North Carolina. Texas State General Land Office, 1976. Report to the Governor and 65th Legislature, TSGLO, Austin, Texas. Fisher, W. L., J. H. McGowen, L. F. Brown, and C. G. Groat, 1972. Environmental Geologic Atlas of the Texas Coastal Zone - Galveston -Houston Area, Bureau of Economic Geology, tin, Rice Center, 1976. Texas Gulf Rice Center for Community Texas. Gabrysch, R. K., 1980 the Houston -Galveston Interior, U.S. Geolog ast Program, Research Report 1, sid Research, Houston, gn an to Land -Surface Subsidence in Texas, U.S. Department of the rvey, Washington, DC. Houston -Galveston Coastal Subsidence District, 1983. Subsidence '83, HGCSD, Houston, Texas. St. Clair, A. E., C. V. Proctor, Jr., W. Kreitler, and J. H. McGowen, 1975. Map Series: Land and Water Resourc Area Council, Bureau of Economic Ge Texas, Austin, Texas. L. Fisher, C. W. Land Resources Labora s - Houston -Galveston I University of TumerCollie�Braden Inc ti x p } N ; E _ . - S : : � f. nY - - - - f7m?_ �y� ( _ - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - ---- -- ( APPENDIX 3 - - - PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS AND INTERVIEWS - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - - - - - -- - ---- -- ---- --- - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - - - - - -- - ---- -- ---- --- ( _ -- - -- - --- - -- --- ----- ----------- f1 n - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ,. _ a fs 4 . Yf -f - ,..- i `. fe e _ _ . . - COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN CITY OF LA PORTE 1. Please rate the fiollowing community services of La Porte. (1) Excei/ent 121 Good, (3) Fair, (4) Poor _Educational —Cultural —Police — Health —Social —Other (specify) Recreational —Fire 2. 3. Would you support a tax or user fee increase in order to support improving city services? Rate the following utility services for La Porte. (11 Requires GreatOeal of lmpravemenr, (21 Some Improvement, (31 Adequate, (4) Mare than Adequate _ Water —Roadways —Electricity _ Sewage — Telephone — Gas Storm Drainage _Garbage and Trash —Other (specify/ _ Cable T.V. —Maintenance ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. Indicate which of the fallowing recreational activities you or one of your family members enjoy participating in actively. ❑ Swimming ❑Football ❑Reading ❑ Jogging ❑Golf ❑Boating ❑ Bicycling ❑Racquetball/Handball ❑Fishing ❑ Tennis ❑Bowling ❑Shooting ❑ Horseback Riding ❑Table Games ❑Service Organizations ❑ Baseball ❑Gymnastics ❑Other IspecifyJ ❑ Basketball ❑ Theater ❑ Movies 5. Do you generally use La Porte's recreational facilities? ❑Yes ❑ No 6. In which of the following cities do you use recreational facilities? ❑ Deer Park ❑Clear Lake ❑ Pasadena ❑ Seabrook/Kemah l❑Galveston ❑Baytown ❑ Houston 7. Would you be willing to pay a service charge for additional recreational facilities? 8. Of the following, which environmental issues are you most concerned with? ❑ Noise ❑Subsidence ❑ Air Pollution ❑Odors ❑ Flooding 9. If you had your way, the future of La Porte should have: ❑ Substantial Growth ❑ No Growth ❑ Little Growth ❑Size Decrease 10. What do you want La Porte to be in the futuret ❑ Residential Community ❑Industrial Center ❑ Resort Community ❑Port/Rail Center ❑ Retirement Community ❑ South Houston ❑ Other Ispecifyl ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Water Pollution ❑ Other (specify) ❑ Combination of Several of the Above ❑ Remain As Is 11. Check the areas La Porte most needs to improve. ❑ Traffic ❑Controlling Growth ❑City Beautification ❑ Air Pollution ❑Employment ❑Other (specify) ❑ Noise ❑ City Services ❑ Recreation Facilities 12. Do you feel La Porte's zoning ordinance is effective? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Don't Know 13. If yes, why do you feel ii is effective? ❑ Appropriate land•use areas are set aside ❑ Setback, frontage restrictions enforcement ❑ Housing density enforcement ❑ Feasibility of multiple -use zoning ❑ Other IspecifyJ 14. Which of the following communities do you favor annexing? ❑ Spenwick area ❑ Bayshore MUD ❑All of the above ❑ College View area ❑Area north of 225 ❑None of the above (Over/ Recreational Activities Number Percent Swimming 161 58.55 Football 91 33.09 Reading 164 59.64 Jogging 84 30.55 Golf 50 18.18 Boating 124 45.09 Bicycling 131 47.64 Racquetball/Handball 50 18.18 Fishing 155 56.36 Tennis 80 29.09 Bowling 81 29.45 Shooting 68 24.73 Horseback Riding 43 15.64 Table Games 52 18.91 Service Groups 73 26.55 Baseball 91 33.09 Gymnastics 29 10.55 Other 20 7.27 Basketball 60 21.82 Theater 112 40.73 Movies 166 60.36 No Answer 5 1.82 Do you use recreational facilities? Yes No No Answer Multiple Answers Number Percent 136 49.45 129 46.91 9 3.27 1 0.36 Pay a service charge for additional recreational facilities? Yes No No Answer Multiple Answers Number Percent 4 52.36 14 111 40.36 20 7.27 0 0.00 3-2 TurnerCollie�Braden Inc 3-3 Is La Porte's zonino ordinance effective? Number Percent Yes 65 23.64 No 103 37.45 Don't Know 5 1.82 Multiple Answers 0 0.00 Distance to Work? Miles Number Percent 0-5 126 45.82 6-10 42 15.27 11-15 21 7.64 16-20 13 4.73 21-25 10 3.64 26-30 5 1.82 +31 16 5.82 No Answer 38 13.82 Multiple Answers 4 1.45 Environmental Issues? Concern Number Percent Noise 58 21.09 Subsidence 142 51.64 Water Pollution 114 41.45 Air Pollution 214 77.82 Odors 119 43.27 Others 12 4.36 Flooding 174 63.27 No Answer 3 1.09 TurnerCollie�Braden Inc La Porte's Future? Type Number Percent Residential 141 51.27 Industrial 33 12.00 Combination 148 53.82 Resort 50 18.18 Port/Rail 17 6.18 Retirement 22 8.00 Remain 14 5.09 No Answer 3 1.09 Occupation Total Number of People Working: 282 Name Number Percent Salesperson 19 6.74 Housewife 7 2.48 Self -Employed 25 8.87 Clerical 12 4.26 Retired 37 13.12 Other 22 7.80 Manager 32 11.35 Professional 74 26.24 Technician 33 11.70 No Occupation 3 1.06 Many Occupation 18 6.38 Education Level Number Percent Less than High School 12 4.36 Some College 82 29.82 College Graduate 53 19.27 High School Graduate 43 15.64 Technical School 6 2.18 Post Graduate 36 13.09 No Answer 4 1.45 Multiple Answers 39 14.18 TumerCollie�Bnden Inc Ln In N Opp Nco aem N ri N N Ln 7 C %D m I r m �p ri sr � d oI d LD u N � Jc r=4 Z N r Ifl N r ri Ln ro Lo r N dJ rl O 0 C IA N r N of N N N I m C � 0 co m O mri Z In +j C N N 1 O it ri r 0 d N 0\ i w J.J m 7 O . p O %0 p If1 t'n r•1 m Vw Ln I I %0 a% O m N r•I 4m) N m 3 V 41 m rn �O yJ a r-I N ri O O r o m mri O NN O +j m fV N co ro \o r N N N J.J Ln w IA p O . C N Z ri %0 $ N m p 1 r ri C . Y N N CD 41 U 0 3 O b � N o 4J I Z Ln� N N co .l N a$4 aIO aIO r=4 m Ln y C y N co +� O v, t0 O ri C O } r-I Ill 111 O r-1 O I I ri m N ri m ri O v1 � c I �0 N 0% N N O t r m N C1 N iJ F+ C 3 U o N >a O d d •.a � Z O C U O 4+ O N a c Y+ N N l+ 4 � 7 O m Z Z � y O\ U O 1a I ro C34 O O Z N 3-6 Size of Household Family Size Number Percent 0 4 1.45 1 28 10.18 2 76 27.64 3 64 23.27 4 63 22.91 5 17 6.18 6 17 6.18 7 5 1.82 8 0 0.00 9 0 0.00 10 or greater 1 0.36 Tax Increase 275 Responses 118 Yes 42.91% 275 Responses 113 No 41.09% 275 Responses 44 Neither 16.00% 275 Responses 0 Both 0.00% Income Breakdown Total = 275 Multiple High Med. Low No Vote Votes Number 109 103 44 19 0 Percent 39.64 37.45 16.00 6.91 0.00 Growth No Multiple Substantial No Little Decreasing Answer Answers 173 14 80 4 2 2 62.91 5.09 29.09 1.45 0.73 0.73 TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc 3-7 Areas La Porte Needs Most Improvement? Type Number Percent Traffic 40 14.55 Controlling Growth 58 21.09 City Beautification 137 49.82 Air Pollution 125 45.45 Employment 99 36.00 Other 23 8.36 Noise 28 10.18 City Services 63 22.91 Recreation Facilities 148 53.82 No.Answer 6 2.18 Where do you shop? Shops Number Percent Deer Park 109 39.64 Gulfgate 32 11.64 Baybrook 170 61.82 Pasadena 179 65.09 Town Square 117 42.55 Almeda Mall 148 53.82 La Porte 174 63.27 San Jacinto Mall 140 50.91 Other 12 4.36 Baytown 107 38.91 No Answer 1 0.36 TumerCollie c�SBradenlnc TELEPHONE SURVEY RESULTS QUESTIONNAIRE 1. 2. 3. 5 6. For now long have you been a resident of La Porte? 0-2 years 3-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 +16 Resident of other community Specify which How many members of your household are currently employed? What distance do you generally drive to work? 0-5 miles 15-20 miles +31 miles 6-10 miles 21-25 miles 11-15 miles 26-30 miles In which of the following areas do you shop? Deer Park Pasadena La Porte Baytown Other Indicate which of the following recreational activities you participate in the most. Outdoor Activities _ Water sports _ Field athletics _ Jogging Bicycling Tennis _ Horseback riding Other Indoor Activities Hobbies Bowling Table games Gymnastics Theater _ Movies Other Reading _ Bird watching _ T.V. Photography Boating _ Fishing Service club Other Which community services most need improvement in La Porte? _ Educational _ Health Recreational _ Cultural _ Police _ Social _ Other Fire TumerCollie c�Br�denlnc 3-9 7. Indicate, in order of preference, the utilities you would like to see improved in La Porte? _ Water — Roadways — Maintenance _ Wastewater — Telephone _ Electicity storm drainage — Waste disposal _ Gas Other 8. If you had your way, the future of La Porte should have: Substantial growth No growth _ Little growth Size decrease TumerCollie�BYaden Inc TELEPHONE SURVEY RESULTS 1. Time of Residence in La Porte (Number of Answers: 50) 0-2 3-5 66=10 11-15 +16 N/A No. 11 12 7 3 12 5 8 22 24 14 6 24 10 2. Number of loved Household Members (Number of Answers: 50) 0 1 2 3 +4 N/A No. 10 22 15 3 0 2 8 20 44 30 6 0 4 3. Distance to Work (Number of Answers: 50) 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 +31 N/A No. 21 7 1 9 2 4 4 2 % 42 14 2 18 4 8 8 4 4. Shopping Preference (Number of Answers: 87) Deer Park Pasadena La Forte Baytown other No. 15 22 38 8 4 % 17 25 44 9 5 5. Recreational Activities Preference (Number of Answers: 188) Outdoor Indoor Movies Reading No. 47 91 22 19 8 52 49 12 10 6. Caarninity Services that Need Improvement (Nimil�er of Answers: 82) Educa- Recre- tion Health ation Culture Social Fire Police Other No. 6 6 25 16 17 2 3 7 8 7 7 30 20 20 3 4 9 TumerCollie�Braden Inc 7. Utilities that Need Irovement (Number of Answers: 65) Waste- Storm Tele- Waste Elec- Water water Drain. Roads phone Disposal tricity Gas Other No. 11 2 25 15 3 9 1 0 0 $ 17 3 38 23 5 12 2 0 0 8. Eiiture Growth of La Porte (Number of Answers: 50) Substantial Little No Decrease N/A No. 18 25 3 1 3 8 36 50 6 2 6 TumerCollie�Braden Inc INTERVIEWS PERFORMED City Management Jack Owen Bob Herrera John Joerns Jerry Hodge Stan Sherwood Councilmen and Committee Members Linda Westergren Lindsay Pfeiffer B. Don Skelton John Longley Janet Graves John Lloyd Ed Matuszak Business Leade John 2emanek - Chamber of Commerce Knox Askins - Attorney John Courville - Banker Pat Callahan - Banker Ben Fleming - Banker Decker McKim - Realtor Carlos Smith - Engineer Sam Glass - Retailer Fred Rogers - Retailer Lewis Nappi - Barbours Cut Terminal Economic Developers 3-12 Ray Wolter - Economic Development, Houston Chamber of Commerce C. A. Kasdorf - Research Manager, Houston Chamber of Commerce Peter Hoag - Regional Economist, First City Bank Carol Bennett - Economist, Texas Commerce Bank Olin Humphries - Regional Manager, Southern Pacific Industrial Development Co. Joe Scroggins - Director of Planning, Port of Houston Authority TumerCollie c�Br�denlnc INTERVIEW RESULTS REGARDING HOUSTON HOUSTON METRO AREA ECONOMIC FUTURE Energy Industry o Will be back i� 1985-1986. o Not as strong as.in past/little new growth. a Will always be important. Port of Houston o Currently down due to world economic situation. o Major factor in future. Medical Center o Will continue to grow. e Major importance to Houston. Warehousing/Distribution a Has been growth area. o Potential in conjunction with port. 3-13 TumerCollie c�SBradenlnc OTHER POTENTIAL GROWTH AREAS Pharmaceuticals o Conjunction with Medical Center. o Use of chemicals. S ace o Manufacturing Robotics o High growth nationally. Cold Storage Operations o Low capacity in Houston area. o Use by petrochemical. o Refrigerated containers. ,f 3-14 TumerCollie�Braden Inc POTENTIAL INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR LA PORTE 3-15 o Container Industry o Recreation o Warehousing/Distribution o Forward Integration of Petrochemicals TurnerCollie(cSBradenlnc CONTAINER INDUSTRY Observations o Current usage down due to world economic situation. Excess containers/need storage. o Long-term growth likely. Low handling costs. Greater security. a Barbours Cut will expand. 3-16 - Three terminals currently--8 planned. Ships prefer Barbours Cut/don't have to go up Ship Channel. Little handling equipment at turning basin. o Container storage --zoning problem. Most not opposed/need to be controlled. - On again/off again problem --economic situation. Need area in north close to port. o Container unloading/stuffing. High value items. - Consolidation/distribution. Key Questions 0 50-mile Rule - Loading/unloading of containers by longshoremen. o Future growth of industry. a Supporting industries needed. o Potential for warehousing/distribution. TumerCollie c�jBracienlnc RECREATION/MARINA Observations o Sylvan Beach only large piece of property available. o Appears to be demand. - Few gas facilities on bay. - Lack of boat launching facilities. High cost of slips in Clear Lake. o Developed by City/operated by private enterprise. o Need restaurant at marina. o Need more recreational facilities. - Parks. - Swimming pools. - Other. Key Questions o Can the City gain control of Sylvan Beach? a Can marina/piers be built and protected given Corps of Engineers' requirements? o Timing --when will demand support? 3-17 TumerCollie�Braden Inc WAREHOUSING/DISTRIBUTION Observations o Warehousing/Distribution--large growth area for Houston. o Potential exists in conjunction with Barbours Cut. o Need exists for petrochemical storage --Crow. o Import cars distribution--Barbours Cut. o Need zoning for trucking terminals/freight forwarders. o Need to address railyard problem. 3-18 o Traffic flow/trucks need to be routed around residential areas. o Potential for cold storage warehouse in conjunction with refrigerated containers. Key Questions 0 50-mile Rule. o Demand for cold storage/competition. TumerCollie�cSBr�den Inc PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY Observations o Most expect no growth/little decline. o Growth will probably go to Bayport. o Great concern with environment --no more pollution. o Most new petrochemical operation going offshore. o No real potential for increasing the tax base on creating new jobs. 3-19 TumerCollie�Braden Inc INDUSTRIES USING PETROCHEMICALS AVAILABLE IN AREA 3-20 Observations o Most think a good idea --no pollution. o Potential industries: - Pharmaceuticals. Synthetic fibers, textiles. - Plastics. o Industries who export and use containers. Key Questions o Petrochemicals available and who uses? o Locational factors for these industries? TumerCollie�Braden lnc OTHER DEVELOPMENT Airport o Observations Large number of planes (250-300). Cannot be expanded. Needs development. o Key Questions - Impact of Ellington. Rc1-ai l o Observations Most think large mall won't work. - Retail will follow population growth. Strip shopping most likely with discount stores. o Key Questions - Population growth and timing. Office o Observations Demand by existing industry small. Most demand in professional area. Lack of current space indicates lack of demand. o Key Questions ' - Will new growth/industries require office space? Residential o Observations 3-21 - Single-family most preferred but limited space, hence lower population and higher taxes. - Growth will be in west --need to "tie" to bay front. - Condos/townhouses questionable except at bay front. TumerCollie(cSBradenlnc 3-22 Residential (Cont'd) o Key Questions - Type of workers in future and residential needs. - Amount of density acceptable. TurnerCollie c�$Bradenlnc e .. 3 - / i- e -, - T 1111 APPENDIX 4 RECREATIONAL FACILITY GUIDELINES - F `W = an - ------ - - - - - < % _ A - • z . { _ - F I «. 4 5 t } .,. t �.s - .. - �!. Kr' _ - - _ - yy mm4 ma NL y N Y + �$S ° MIS q Q 6 o�yygmq o � � o �ppl q C S O O O LO VO mO V] u1 N ti N rl N .y N L t � � y c 5m A A xq § g gyp@ pp +� v� a O qC O O m A� a CIE >$ G o �q m o � aw�p �n mu off°'ra U mLm q V ; uaa C L mYY .i m 'OO C3 N�.`iOm gy�OV LRIIIIIIC tiN �q�Om00sO �1 C xxxs Wimq rl Nfxt y � C 111111111110012 7V& 29a Z - m N � Y N � v � Ym � O �p C yQ�• mC 10, ypp mm u tp� Y tiq L m 4 H by �y qq W V S O � O 7 G O O 1 0 Y LI YggO YO ��1.1 ti N rI N ti L L dY N E L m I m 4�+'O 0 1m+ p G N Y L0000 CCCYUIII A o` OL c C myu A �a&8mm�%yyT �Om00 0E0 !xQ tr OI UpL Cy �t cc fa. A � rl Y VI N io 8 mm C m .E. C ] O m O A m R m m R C •- . q 1m Cps m m 1m C mm m O m�m O �mpm N 7 y h V m C C C C n C O O c rl U+ + O Lm X A X R c Xm X.�i :,L RtiL L A- fi C cc 2 M A ..Oi N w 'm US C9 i0 OY W .yl O mmi C L� Qm 0 y ZIas O 3 N� W L1i 00 &4 ull y m m W O Y L Y +mn L Cpm XXuiai �tppi iic N Oi" i L tm C L g L & 3mm _ yl myG O wm Y W N N u C L O C y m Lm aLi O m iC � 9 C .Nn 01.i E mN 7 � V MM ~ O vlmm �ti E AE �ym m9'O � mOP mm N m O 9 3 C L W V um Cp1 uo 8L� m �� �yEm Lj W CO U m2Y yyN 0q1 L Q N N� O~gm % m W �0 p M C C � � O 9 V F mG fu m -Ni 3 ��rYi aYi S y Lami 11 0 b v € x p i� G m„ s V � A L ORl @G@ C O C N'O'O 7 qM 0 d q spa SL O�m9Fppu W ti L m C c Y A U m y E w.�mr L Gi m W M~EE O w E I e 4 O 4 �m p C F� m y E w.�mr L Gi m W M~EE O w E I F� Ln I M a x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x yyp A u My ii G X x x x mWm ti L C m�r6 m n rGi G W 00� ..may N L 8 m U C L L 0Wp (Y O O W y M W W W rl G ip O O N T C O I I N N E G C rirr -x m I I I I vv moo E I I I I N N N N •ryi IG(1 W ti N C 0 m U t'\lJl G Y w mx � "I mam fUtiu E Z� � � � m l l l N •�. ID > m l 1 � 8 i / . . . . - . \ - - - } . . . . . . . Bj! @ . . . , - - * . ) -4 E In ! C a - t & , , , - ( \ ! ; 7 aj wz q t ) I \ - Z I I L ) ) C } � ] � ] f ) \ » m t « # ! a d § a a I U O ! ad v \ • k II I J f IlI t ! , "—I / ) - ' • _ - • ° l - - U - � �• - • z _ m• \ \ ) \ Z / ] ) ` � E ! a s 2 \ I ! = ! 2 ® ) \ k 2 § j \ ji \ ) 4-1 2k \ j \ 2 \ \ ) ( } } ) ) - ( • • - , ( - APPENDIX 5 COMMUNITY FACILITY GUIDELINES tV - - . 1 . - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - --- -- - ------- --- - -- - - - -- ---- } p- -- - - - ,'I - - . - - Yir ter,. . . . . . . .. .... . . . . . ..... . . . 1 ° k ! 2 5 C• | ! # . § g E In { 0 - \ RI ! � 2 k j . \ { ) ; 19 ( 4J » ! \ \ k �k • La $ 2 ] 2 ) - w \ / } \ } 0 \ / 0 \ } \ \ 5 \ \ ( I Q2 a � •} 2 \ k o l.al \ \ \ C } k } \ ) \ \ / . \ ) } S ] ( ) ! ) � ! ! j \ \ \ k \ \ ! \ sw ; B ) \ \ �o \ , % ) } ) « ! / 2 - w 2 f Cl ) } ) 91 } ) $ } 7 In \ � j \ \ / j wl Ln m c w �c 8 u N N O� Oi $a0 0 o g G C om 8 $a �0 31 G O 3 m 3 m wpm $o So SS bo a o 0 yy im1pp hCCUY mti IOm Nf�.f N V H + � O A �I o �s o0 0o g$ oa a N 1'1 fV n1 .mi .�i mmi tmn N N a .Ni m LE n e m Lip A t C m L p m y m p mOw CM, mN.pp� NI. C� In m M I u a m M m C L L y 1 c u q Y r m 00 ypp mME P9 O o .1 9 p 3m a$o cn $ �, m C�•Ci .Ci C1 8 .mmi �j � p�L C i >f� > �r 10 •..y O �j m O O tip �. N Y .O$ IO2a w $ �g dwS %9, E'9r dg mZ w8 9 tttJJJ � uqq N N$ m V x a Ch € Az m s s �u a 04 W H 8 M yug5 m '6 r m m n M L, m f y m q W {YmpL W W {Wp! W Y M y � imJ Y v V Y u V V U U U U t+� 2B" ., 0 m .�i u am+ ami ami w"y osg am $ $m $ $ $ $ C_ q q C C C C C C C C bo =�� �Vyy W Y a iff 4 N 10�'f � Oil00 7 mm Y Y O� L Y L Y NIOn PfNL i � mN ; % i A qt g 0� C u 9L 6 � q c �9 0. g 0' u 3. g m n w u do qm4 dap{ $ ad 2 adw asu U a�J 9 0 C q umm � a CL to T m m A 20 a Bitv L B Y � a m Ln �yL7 m yU p� Q 0 V 9 C7 fA CmJ 9 V 6 9 ) ! E z \ ) ■ ,r. 0 o O 0 0 0 p o O O O E N O N N i m U g jpy7 8 � N m m N N G � 0 pi r i N x x x X % % % X % 0 0 0 0 0 o c O 0 0 0 0 0 0 V1 N O Or N N O O \ O O O O O O O O O O O O U1 Yf O O ti N ^1 rl N N m Ln t F IF, - IF I,, III,__�� IF I IF I I. IF IF N IF 1 IF r � -"If F.F F,_ Fol _ IF IF. IF IF IF F I S: FIR I I IF IF I _. IF IF I IF I IF I IF APPENDIX 6IF IF E. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM D ETAILS IF If f IF 1 I. kIF IIF 1. IF i IF I IF I III IF IfIl IF f IF IF L I IF 1 IF i IF IF IF s IF I IF I IF 14 I IF IF I I IF IF fI IF IF r IF :4 IF IF If I. -_F - -. Fk 6-1 THOROUGHFARE PLAN - PROBABLE CITY OF LA PORTE COSTS OF THE 5-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM* Probable Total Improvements Unit Cost Per Unit Probable Cost ROW Acquisition 115,200 $1.25/sq. ft. $ 144,000 Surface Improvements 30,674 $46.00/sq. yard 11411,000 Curb and Gutter 23,000 $20.00/l.f. 460,000 Intersections 3 $40,000/unit 120,000 TOTAL $2,135,000 *Do not include prospective county or state projects. TurnerCollie�Braden Inc N W O ° O O CD CD 0 0 O 000 0 0 CD O V CD O O O CD O O 0 0 0 O O O CDO CDO CD O O O O O O � N 01 N ko lD N d' r M C d' O j� %O O rl d' O O N rl N coM C O ro M M Ll1 N 4\ 01 tD r-I 01 RV : �O Ln ON Uj M t11 f+01• 01 �O M O V} f/T V} Vi U} V} t? O O O O 0 0 0 O I O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O ro rl N Q1 qT N ON Ill 00 N N tQ co to C yA„I M M Ln N : N �O M : N 01 If1 CCp11 �1�.�1 Ln O% to O '•1 M N W �-i .i N � ai f? N V}V! V� O O O I 1 I O O O O O O 1 CD (I O CD CD O O O qw Ln po qw � NLn rr N M O N %O O1 r1 M rl N 60 d' m C rM4 •r-1 yy.. FL U} VN V} V) 4} I I I I 000 0 III t o N � 0 0 0 O 4 LN 'i m CD (n O� 8ml W CD �rC M cn 00 V Ca] ut N cm N O) � 3 I t I I I III I Io0 O CD 00 0 CD 0 Vr=4two r r U, rno rn rn ;± V' N %O �C y U} V} U} W n O ri row N>4 134 • M c row Oj si ' m c 1�,4.1 c e� Z CQ V >o uo too > a>3 �vrm�vr En'8 _ 44 p R41 yew ° N°to 0 C° U toto U t yj ++ ° 4� Lp 4J a.I 00 En U fJl �-1 EllV t�Jll G_ U1 O 6-3 THOROUGHFARE PLAN - LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GRADE SEPARATION INTERSECTIONS - PROBABLE COST City County State Grade Separations Grade Separation 1* ($10,000,000.00) $0 S 0 $20,000,000 Grade Separation 2* ($51000,000.00) 0 0 30,000,000 Grade Separation 3* ($1,750,000.00) 0 $3,500,000 0 TOTAL $0 $3,5000000 550,000400 *See paragraph 1.3. TumerCollie�Br�cfen Inc 41 W O Coco O U coca O coca 0 co H r r p OOrr Ln H It OulHm in it aJ O r-1 r•I d' O w E a yr yr W tl1 N ajI Co C000 O H e 0 0 0 0 O w N Coco O N U . � y C M k0 O N r-I C•.d MqKrNO v1 •rd 4•1 N M N N O c O r4 w U 0 VA C O 41 U 7 L 01 r. r� O O vU 0000 0 C O O O O O O O O O n Ln �4 tn ko rin0r 0 r � a% %D in .-1 M rh � 1� W C N rl E�- m � oo O w C0co >� 0 oom 14 c N CO O m N i41 rN O � U Sa 7 y Coco id 0000 y1 • . . . tll r r0 M rti C rn N aT O 0 r-1 FE4 �-1 N U U I 0% 0000 O O O O Cf I I 1 I p 0000 ro � 0000 C d 11 1 1 •e+ rC 01 H l0 ro to N rti OOO i1 N rl r•1 .--I oml ammw O T N 41 W O Coco 0 0 V 0000 O O 0 0 0 0 O O .•i r•-I r m O %0 M In r V' 1n N m H ro m in M vi M m ro� � O ,--1 N N r ry O $4 .A N N pi.rj C U 0 0 0 0 0 0 •. i C o 0 0 0 O O S.i N 0000 o O N N c r In N r H N C •.I fV 01 L'N C •,a �+ a� Ln in � �o r� m C C O N w U � (A % 0000 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O CN l0M 1f1 H N m O N rm vrnmv� kD �0 ,., H .-� r•I to Q\ 11 W C • N � N pr Coco Oy OCOO >a LO o Ln Ln ac H ct�r+fv a r•I C ++ O � w U Sa 7 N O C O O }.I O O O O N 41 rro l0c C N Lo Hr-IH 4m O O M •=4 Ln UU ta- 4 0000 O O O O H N O I I I I ro y m* oroN JJ U ro F. 000� O d C N I i l l d 0 ro rn �000 a - $4 i1 N a ow w¢wa a E F F� UTILITIES PLAN - PROBABLE COST OF PRORISED ViATER SYSTEM (In Thousands of 1984 Dollars) 5-Year Program Projects After 1990 TOTAL Construction Cost of Waterlines $1,208 3,860 $5,068 Construction Cost of Pi rnp/Storage Facilities 7,000 $8,330 Engineering & Contincencies 6-5 Total Probable Cost $ 2,786 11,515 $14,301 TumerCollie�Braden Inc PROBABLE COST OF COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Probable Cost (In Thousands Proposed Project of Dollars) 5-Year Improvement Program Fairmont Parkway Interceptor Sewer $ 4,434 Big Island Slough Trunk Sewer 1,090 North 14th St. Trunk Sewer 331 Central La Porte Relief Sewer 33 East La Porte Relief Sewers/Pump Stations 1,190 Bay Shore Relief Sewer 155 Main Plant Phase 1 Expansion 3,614 Subtotal $10,847 Improvement Program After 1990 Spenwick/College View Submain Sewers $ 175 Big Island Slough Trunk and Submain Sewers 1,425 East Fairmont Park Submain Sewer 89 Bay Area Blvd. Trunk and Submain Sewers 2,124 14th St. Trunk Sewers 695 Central La Porte Relief Sewer 140 South La Porte Submain Sewer 144 East La Porte Submain Sewer 464 Main Plant Phase 2 Expansion (+2.8 mgd) 5,166 Main Plant Phase 3 Expansion (+3.0 mgd) 5,535 Subtotal $15,957 TOTAL $26,804 Note: Specific unit costs and detailed probable cost breakdown is presented in the Comprehensive Plan for Collection and Treatment Systems, Turner Collie & Braden, April 1984. TumerCollie�Braden Inc 41 8 p O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O 009898989 O O O O O O O Co00o O o000000O o d M V' O M M M k0 O V' w O%D N O w ri r OMN er OIn kO r-i m r-i MO In 010)r (A In MNNNNN vv r rml r ri M Sa yg a O 0 0 1 00 O 00000 0000 000 00 O T C 0 1 00 O O C O C 0 0 0 0 O E O% O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O r1 MC MM M NOm w w w t00 (N HN ra%0 wr rq Ill In w l0 w w MO %0 p1� r.l�r kO VO r N Nr ri N r4M IV V' oC W N r♦ V' rl M a U). wh oil UT Ln m O 01 O O O O CDO O O O O O N Q) I O O O O O O I O O I O C I O \ 01 0 0 0 C O O O O Co O r ya O O O ON O O V' V' V' co co w d 0) V So� V' 07 I!i 01 O% N 16 O Ln H O L M M N i A PO I N� o voi +.' N r V' 00) r4 w M rri 0 N � r4 m ri V' � 14 m 3 w a � i a qut O ya w w tw t N U Q i O dN N O O O O O O O O a o0 oOooO000 gg sIppa.+ o0 00 00 ft 000a 00 0 [r] m Ia Ill NInO wCN N V' d' V M O p 00 CNM rd tnm r-I N NNM 4} W. Vl- th N ro w w u orml � rg ro J �� ����c m 04 N aj Op7f rym 3 0 i+ .gyp fo C � 4p :9 4J U C L 0 0 00 0 CD0 CD CD 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD CD000 O O CD CD ON V'Ln%D U1 OO O dv rl N O CD u1 ui cN r% 0 � fA ar 0 000 0 01 0 000 0 o CD o 000 0 0 o ui d' LO �Q Ln CD CD N N O O C r f/} UT V} 4} 4} 00 0 0 00 0 qqr O O O N O O O N N d' I� 0- t* CD 0 0 0 O O CD O O O CD O O O O CD CD O O 0 rUi Ln1f1 O O CDO CD W �M ri ri N LO C (A-ut 4.1 O c O O I O CD CD rMA 7 O to O O O Ln Sa ONm C44 N 01 ,j raft, cri0 Ln r Npp Lpp 0 U U � ri i V' e } N V} 41 oll0 0 0 0 i 'A % tl�tl W Ln CD CD in �Cp ) N co rNi co en O u} ri N O W No 00LnCD OI Ln ID rml rwq Ln C O H _ UI QI O G U ti� a,UUU � N I I co co co I N .w N 3.+ 1 in U N www w ri RC yr yr V} Vr yr I � N U t!l a U W l� N C O O n O C ,lad C O qw V ri ew W ci � ri ri O ri Q�f y y� S+ N 1+ Y C 4J rall m r'i ic� LiS U rml� ro 10 11,4 m e o c .0 r�i d �rgi N "Up' U w �iaadOU1 (! 3 ~ P O CM O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O chum oocn 0 kc o m co (n N m cokO N O N .-� C N w t0 �y�p� �p O u) CD C `ta N O O .-� O � 0 PI CJ r-1 r-i N ri r♦ r-1 r-I N .M4 1�4 U), Uf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O M O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O aJ O O O O O O O O O O O O r= O O O O O O O O %D Ln ill O SNa tf1 C Ln O OWN N r=l 1� M M So J �0o 00 M 00 0 O %D O O O N : ill P+ U U N .-1 ri ri ri H O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 .1 0 0 0 0 O I O O I O O O aJ O O O O O O d�pp 0] v M V' 00 t0 M Ln M 00 I a-� N co N 40 co r Cn fco f=4Mr1 �O � � � ro i� 8 ago (aa oOOO 000 0 0 0l 00 lawo roco ocoN CoN °o ui o% ; m 10 ~ °10 [ram] H a d' M V' 00 Ln I M I , r� l NI r j H h H a � H 4J Cry. rU-1 fn Da w Ln in Ln O] Ln tn Ln C4 Ln W W a U 0000 00� O W 0000 r-1 000a yr ar yr yr f r rh ur c) yr yr i4 1 1 m o g �trlU W N q.p 000 CD rLMi v C H 0 �+ rJ ri r4 ,mq r� o r4 CV cccyyyvvvm d OC 414-1YC H � ( N H (1) U .a rJ N U ty ro C 7 G 0 C y0y� U V 7 SUa S4 0)>>o roi 1: J U d 7 W Gro. *1UU cu fw C7 W�i U� J3 ~ 41 p O O O O o O O O O O O 00 O CJ O O O o O O O CD CD O O O O O CD O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 ,.�.� Nri d' r 000000 O 00 0 rmr r -i uiao%DgTr4%D 0 00 0 Intl O r-i r-i rri U1 r %D N �+ q c ui mrmi �+ ur ur V). yr ur ul- N 000 o Oo0oo0 0 0OCo O o00000 0 000 0 000000 0 d' ri V' 01 O O CD CDO O O tomr ko. tnwmcri%o r oOrn o rirl �+ 0 M N m N y�aN ri O •rl N U a� O C N 88 0 o 0lCD 00 0 N lOI r �I; 0 I 0 0t01�1 O O O C O o; 0 0 0 O O O m r� ri rml ri U} rq V! U} V} V} U} O O 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 U1 O O OJ w rn V1 C m N r4 ri N .-i VT V} U} V} V) U} Vf VT V} V} V} W W W W ri ri O o O OI 1f1 tn !o!1 r W V' v NmN V1 0 P1 00 %D M N N r ri C'I 01 r4 111I rM4 N N C O U N W p1 N UI N O r-I O +� O � � � a A AAA 1 41 AA U) I� 10J U 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o 00 O O O O O CD o0 00 0 r CD CD Ir 04 ri 1�0 f`O'1 CN m N coT m r m O m ski O rr-I r-I N H 01. f/T q} yr f/f yr d CD 0 0 i 0C 00 0 00 0 0 cc a al ° N CD tb � 00 d (y) N rnaN f t 7O 0 0 o t°n 0 0 0 co N m U1 N ri ri to r•I df p} fa I 1 1 I O 0 0 pt cco n O O 0 ll II O CD co CD CD coma 0 0 m 0 0 m co m m to to to o rn to qT f!} Vim} m yr cNir e O .J N U 41 88 O O 00 00 oc 0 0 o � ta w w N O ° r r-I t+1 •r1 •rt a.1 44 tw "I C ,a H r•i H C $4 ?7p+ �pp U >1 ccO RC W O b "' O row m m � pro T �A PORTS COMPREI�IENSIVE PLAN ®� E4o'T TurnerCollie nc. ,N ASSOCIATION W$;H LWFW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET (5 \ ry LA tIRRTE COMPRETurnerCollie cnc. IN ASSOCIATION WITH L W F W INC. RESISTANCE TO CHANGE MAP HENSIVE EXHIBIT PLAN ®� 41 VERNON G. HENRY & ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE INFEET r:t rr/�ss�- bbEEIF AN ORTE COMPREHENSIVETurner ollie Braden Inc . AE,GC,A WIT.. LWEW INC. VERNON G. HENRY & ---- DEVELOPMENT - OBSTACLES LAND USE OBSTACLES +\" ® AREAS RESTRICTED BY SEWER CAPACITY ��? O AREAS RESTRICTED BY WATER CAPACITY AREAS RESTRICTED BY SEWER AND WATER CAPACITY .. JT FLOODWAY BOUNDARY IN -YEAR FLOOOPLA N BOUNDARY 1 500 YEAR FLOODPLAtN BOUNDARY HIGHWAYS ' a AYB I \ JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS PIPELINES ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINES - RAILROAD AND RAILROAD YARD I PLAN ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT O 600 9000 42 FJCRTH SCALE IN FEET S 7— i • ■� � SW � ,;;;:;:•,tea -M $%_ _ I, "t'!,' 'aa __ Ytt ?tP1A3I III r; •: S . • es �___ . 11 I �� .•,,�� `� i' 1 {: < Za __ s•. < •::•::•::•;:::•::>:::::... �r LTER CEPTS PLAN ON l �� LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - --------------- - - - ~� I.,•T —;•:• HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I'll A /—_—_ _--U l= -. i :;::;�1::: :.•� 01 INDUSTRIAL AREAS F / �! _ •[>::.;:::: >`:`::•::•: �'` COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT �- - - :r �: E� PUBLIC USE } a 10401, "I'll - II y11411, ACTIVITY AREAS BAVFRONT DEVELOPMENT c + An; rr�rrr��l OPEN SPACE SYSTEM �"� �� THOROUGHFARES TL ORTE COMPRENENSIVE o .�3�E%HIBIT umerCollieB�den lnc N. s so ToW F W IT INC. VERNON G, ® 44 HENRY& ASSOCIATES NORTH SCALE IN FEET I -f✓ i�ftfF± A