Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-15-11 Planning and Zoningff 7 f i City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Notice is hereby given of a Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission to be held on September 15, 2011, at 6:00 P.M. at City Hall Council Chambers, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas, regarding the items of business according to the agenda listed below: 1. Call to order 2. Consider approval of August 18, 2011, meeting minutes. 3. Receive presentation from Pate Engineering on the Main Street Traffic Study. Presentation Workshop Public Input 4. La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update A. Overview of Chapter 2, Land Use and Character • Overview presentation • Discussion and comment B. Preview of Chapter 3, Infrastructure and Growth Capacity (including Public Safety) C. Next Steps • Chapter 3, (Deliverable October 17, 2011) • City Council (Briefing and status report October 24, 2011) 5. Administrative Reports 6. Commission Comments on matters appearing on agenda or inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information of existing policy 7. Adjourn A quorum of City Council members may be present and participate in discussions during this meeting; however, no action will be taken by Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees, requests should be received 24 hours prior to the meetings. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019. CERTIFICATION I certify that a copy of the September 15, 2011, agenda of items to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board on the day of 1 2011. Title: Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of August 18, 2011 Members Present Les Bird, Richard Warren, Helen LaCour, Phillip Hoot, Hal Lawler, Lou Ann Martin, Mark Follis, and Danny Earp. Members Absent: Doretta Finch City Staff Present Assistant City Manager, Traci Leach; City Planner, Masood Malik; Planning Assistant, Shannon Green and Assistant City Attorney, Clark Askins. 1. Call to order Meeting called to order by Chairman Hal Lawler at 6:01 p.m. 2. Consider approval of August 2, 2011, meeting minutes. Motion by Richard Warren to approve the regular meeting minutes of August 2, 2011. Second by Danny Earp. Motion carried. Ayes: Les Bird, Richard Warren, Helen LaCour, Phillip Hoot, Hal Lawler, Lou Ann Martin, Mark Follis, and Danny Earp. Nays: None Abstain: None 3. Open Public Hearing to receive citizen input for Special Conditional Use Permit Request #11- 91000004, which has been requested for the property described as TR 21, Nebraska Syndicate, Johnson Hunter Survey, Abstract 35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas. Dave Beck on behalf of B &G Crane Service, LLC., is seeking approval of a Special Conditional Use Permit for establishing a facility to be located at 910 State Highway 146 North. Heavy construction equipment rental and leasing is classified as a conditional use per City's Code of Ordinances. Masood Malik, City Planner informed the commission the applicant requested staff to postpone the Public Hearing request. A. Staff Presentation There were none. B. Proponents There were none. C. Opponents There were none. D. Proponents Rebuttal There were none 4. Close Public Hearing. N/A 5. Consider recommendation to City Council regarding Special Conditional Use Permit Request #11- 91000004 for proposed establishment to be located at 910 State Highway 146 North. N/A 6. Open Public Hearing to receive citizen input regarding a grant proposed for Harris County project year 2012 Home Investment Partnership (HOME) Program for construction of eight (8) affordable single - family homes in the City's Northside. Chairman Hal Lawler opened the Public Hearing at 6:05pm. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of August 18, 2011 Page 2 of 3 A. Staff Presentation Tim Tietjens, Planning Director gave staff report. Tim Tietjens, Planning Director, reported on the City's application for grant funding for new construction of eight (8) affordable single - family homes in the City's Northside Neighborhood. Mr. Tietjens described the process and spoke about the program's success to date. B. Proponents Charlie Perry, 127 N. 4 "Street, spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Perry noticed that during the previous project there was difficulty in placing prospective buyers in the homes so the homes stood vacant for long periods. He spoke about the difficulty in qualifying eligible buyers and suggested special consideration be given in instances where a prospective buyer is disqualified because of being just under or just over the threshold. Mr. Perry asked City Staff to work with Harris County on possible ways to alleviate this problem. C. Opponents There were none. D. Proponents Rebuttal There were none. 7. Close Public Hearing Chairman Hal Lawler closed the Public Hearing at 6:28pm. 8. Discuss proposed policy regarding street construction standards for truck terminals off authorized truck routes. Masood Malik, City Planner gave staff's report. The Commission previously held a workshop to review the City's official truck route map and discuss possible additions of new truck routes along South 16 Street north and south of Fairmont Parkway. Staff was directed to prepare cost estimates and furnish a cost benefit analysis for the reconstruction of those streets either asphalt or concrete. Staff calculated the projected value of developed and undeveloped properties along these rights -of -way and found that the benefits are less than the annual payment towards the costs. The Commission asked staff to draft a policy for owners /developers to build and use public street rights -of -way for truck terminals within appropriately zoned property that does not have direct frontage on a designated truck route. As per draft policy, owner /developer of the truck terminal facility shall make necessary improvements to the road surface and street will be maintained by the City if the construction standards are in accordance with the City's Public Improvement Criteria Manual (PICM). The Commission debated about truck terminal locations and operations and asked staff to put the draft policy on hold until a proper definition of truck terminal is determined. 9. Administrative Reports a. Consultants will deliver Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan update late Aug and will be up for review at the September 15, 2011, Planning and Zoning meeting. b. Staff is currently working with prospective consultants on the Northside Neighborhood Plan Update. Notice to proceed will be issued soon. c. The Texas APA conference is in Austin October 5 -7, 2011, Commission members interested in attending, should send request to Shannon Green before September 2, 2011. 10. Commission Comments on matters appearing on agenda or inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information or existing policy Lou Ann Martin inquired about the status of Lakes of Fairmont Greens. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of August 18, 2011 Page 3 of 3 Masood Malik informed Commission members, the builder is still doing his due diligence. 11. Adjourn Motion by Richard Warren to adjourn the meeting, Second by Phillip Hoot. Motion Carried. Chairman Hal Lawler adjourned the meeting at 8:00pm. Ayes: Les Bird, Richard Warren, Helen LaCour, Phillip Hoot, Hal Lawler, Lou Ann Martin, Mark Follis, and Danny Earp. Nays: None Abstain: None Submitted by, Shannon Green Planning Assistant Approved on this day of , 2011. Hal Lawler Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission CITY OF LA FORTE OFFICE OF COUNCIL. DISTRICT 4 September 1, 2011 Tommy Moser Councilman, District 4. 604 W Fairmont Parkway La forte, Texas 77571 Dear Main Street Area Business Owner and Resident: mosert @lapertetx.gov 281- 470 -5019 Fax: 281- 470 -5009 To better understand the needs of our business owners and residents, and taking into account the traffic patterns in the Main Street area, a Main Street Traffic Study was commissioned by the City of La Porte, and a report has been provided by Pate Engineering, which was presented to the City Council at the August 22' meeting. You can find this study on the City's website by logging on to www.lanortetx.gov On the front page, you will find the heading CITY SPOTLIGHT. Locate the information titled CITY OF LA PORTE MAIN STREET TRAFFIC STUDY and click on the link. The City is having a workshop on this item during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 6:00 pm, on Thursday, September 15, 2011, in the La Porte City Hall Council Chambers, at 604 W. Fairmont Parkway. On behalf of the City Council, I urge you or your representative to attend this very important meeting to provide your input. If you have any other concerns or questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Tommy Moser Councilmember, District 4 TMlpf Enclosure CITY OF LA FORTE OFFICE OF COUNCIL DISTRICT 4 Tommy Moser mosert @laportetK.gov Councilman, District 4 231- 470 -5019 504 W Fairmont Parkway Fax: 231-470 -5009 La Porte, Texas 77571 September 1, 2011 Dear Main Street Area Business Owner and Resident: To better understand the needs of our business owners and residents, and taking into account the traffic patterns in the Main Street area, a Main Street Traffic Study was commissioned by the City of La Porte, and a report has been provided by Pate Engineering, a copy of which is provided with this fetter. The City is Raving a workshop on this item at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 6:00 pm, on Thursday, September 15, 2011, in the La Porte City Hall Council Chambers, at 604 W. Fairmont Parkway. As your District 4 Councilmember, and on behalf of Mayor Louis Rigby, At Large -A Councilmember John Zemanek, and At Large -B Councilmember Dottie Kaminski, we strongly urge you or your representative to attend this very important meeting to give your input. In the meantime, you are being provided with the enclosed information, which was presented to City Council at its August 22 "d meeting. If you have any other concerns or questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Tommy Moser Councilmember, District 4 TM /pf Enclosure Main Street Traffic Study La Porte, Texas LA FORTE LEVEL OF SERVICE.kNALYSIS -TRAFFIC SIMULATION RESULTS I ml I a C= ���\ � ��� / S3 W 3M,q EW7 ISK�V-_s 9�970 m w i :71i 6 1 T- CHARACTER As expi-essed in Chapter 1, Plait Context, La. Porte will continue to be affected and shaped by significant internal and external influences, changing conditions, a clianging priorities. This chapter and stibsequent chapters are intended to emphasilze Bozo; the Cihq can proactively respond to the influences and conditions throtc c, , h policy and j prtNram-s, or and nive,qnient to ensure the coinninnitaj in 20 years enibodies the facture the citizens envision — a quality, sitstainable., and higltly livable connnunity. This chapter emphasizes the idea of "coinnainitzj character," zuhich consider -s snore than the use of land, inchiding the. elen-mits cfsitu and building design, the influence of ad sites, and use and integi of open space, and the z . impacts and relationships between sites and the built and natural environments. It as these elements that collectively determine [lie character, quahtal appearance, and livabilitif of the coninninity. 2.1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to establish the necessary policy guidance to enable the City to plan effectively for its future infill Nam= Ch. 2, Land Use and ComnlUnfty Character A CONANAt-MIJ)" VISION 1 1_r1 TFXA - 2010 M'DAT17 DDUAFTSIPTEM8EK2.20ll enhancement of La Purte's appearance. To ensure the outcomes expressed by this plan, it is important tofollow the guiding principles, visions, policies, and action recommendations set forth; all pf which will aid the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council im their decision'making. 2.2 Focus Areas, Goals. Actions & Initiatives Throughout the planning process a number of issues and concerns were expressed relating to land use oompatiti|by, in0|| on the few remaining developable tracts, redevelopment of vacant buildings or underutilized properties, Downtown and Sylvan Beach, neighborhood protection and revitalization, and corridor design and appearance. These discussions formed the basis of the following focus areas, along with on analysis of existing conditions and review of current programs, plans, and ordinances. Each focus area contains contextual information, key planning considerations, goals, (and their rationales), and advisable implementation actions and initiatives. The areas uf focus are asfollows: w Focus AreoI — Tr nshion|ogVuaQui It-Out Corn mwnity; v Focus Area 2— Quality Neighborhoods and Housing; ° Focus Area 3— Enhanced Community Character; and 0 Focus Area 4— Adequate Parks, Recreation, and Open Space. Over the 20-year planning horizon of this plan, much of the remaining developable land in La Porte will be built out. As this occurs, the City's focus will shift from new development on the City's western periphery to smaller- scale infill development, as well as redevelopment and revitalization ofthe City's existing older sites and structures. As identified during the public participation process (including feedback from the City Council and Planning and IomlnQ Commission), there is already areas that are in need of redevelopment or rewiim||aabun. These areas are displayed in the Map 2.1, Redevelopment/Rehabilitation Target Areas, and include such areas asthe vacant car dealerships along S. 10th Street and certain residential areas like those located in the area around Downtown and the Spenu/idkSobdivision, among others. To reverse the disinvestment im these areas, it will require the City to establish and administer a pro-active and ongoing program for redevelopment and revitalization. Generally, redevelopment and rehabilitation programs can comprise "one or more public actions that are undertaken to stimulate activity when the private market is not providing sufficient capital and economic activity to achieve the desired level of improvement, This public action usually involves one or more measures such as direct public investment, capital improvements, enhanced public services, technical assistance, promotion, Draft OB.31 tax benefits, and other stimuli including planning initiatives such as rezoning."' So, what is the difference between redevelopment and rehabilitation? Typically, redevelopment is transformative in nature and may be undertaken by the private sector without any active public involvement beyond the government's traditional regulatory role. For example, a developer could make application to demolish and redevelop the vacant car dealership properties along S. 10 Street to develop a mixed-use neighborhood or business park, In certain instances however, public sector incentives, (e.g., decreased regulatory barriers, streamlined permitting, reduced fees, etc.), may also be warranted to facilitate the likelihood of private sector reinvestment. i American Planning Association (APA) Policy Guide on Public Redevelopment. http://www.planning.org/policy/guides/aclopted/redevelopment.htm. April 25, 2004. A CONAM [ JN I 1Y VI �10N FOR [ A 1'0 10 F I FW 010 U PDA I F DRAFT SEPTEMBER2,2011 Benefits of mixed use in0|U development include a more compact form of development, which is less consumptive on land and resources and offers increased convenience and mobility for those who |mfi|| development will also p|oV a primary role during the 20- ear planning horizon since the City isbound by industrial districts and the limits of other municipalities. Therefore, new development and redevelopment will likely occur im the few remaining vacant or under-utilized parcels adjacent toorwithin already developed areas. While these remaining areas could bm developed using the same policies and regulations that shaped the last ZU years of City growth; it is an opportune time tm re-examine how the City facilitates and regulates development, particularly because of an articulated interest to increase residential rooftops and commercial retail opportunities. A successful inUU development program must go beyond the piecemeal development ofindividual panels; to focus om 6ovv the remaining areas may be assembled and developed into the existing community fabric, i.e., creating healthy mix ofuses (that add both vitality and convenience for residents) that are designed and built ima way to improve compatibility while offering additional choices in living and new business opportunities. Benefits of mixed use in0|U development include a more compact form of development, which is less consumptive on land and resources and offers increased convenience and mobility for those who both the needs and purchasing power of the City's existing and future As discussed later in this chapter and throughout this comprehensive plan, two ways to facilitate successful in#U development are to adhere twthe principles of Smart Growth and to adopt a character-based approach to zoning and land development. Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and initiatives are intended to address the specific issues and needs identified during the public participation process (and outlined in Chapter %, Plan 2 Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington. Report No. 38—|nfiU Development Strategies for shaping Livable Neighborhoods. June 199T http://www.mrsc.org/Publications/textfill.aspx. Retrieved on August 31, 2011. DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 GOAL 1: Provide additional attention and resources to promote new |nfiUdevelopment and red evelopment/revita lization of established areas. Redevelopment/rehabilitation efforts require cooperative action to encourage new and sustained private investment and to provide supporting rehabilitation of public infrastructure. A key part of the process is determining the strategic actions and initiatives the community sbmm|d take to achieve its redevelopment goals and objectives. Successful redevelopment will often require cooperation and coordination between agencies at different levels of government, as well as non-profit community prgamizmtions. This should include coordination of physical improvements with social service programs that aim to enhance the health and economic capacity ofresidents in targeted neighborhoods. There are several sizeable undeveloped and underdeveloped parcels within the City that provide opportunities for infi|| development where streets and utilities already exist or may be readily extended. There are also many individual lots that may be developed. In addition, there are several areas that warrant consideration of redevelopment or revitalization during the 20-year horizon of this plan. Acdomamd|nitimth/es 1) Conduct individual redevelopment or rehabilitation plans for those areas identified on Map 1.1, Redeve6mpmmentlRehob8itadoo Target Areas. These plans should be created in partnership with the City, land and business owners, adjacent property owners, and other stakeholders to determine the most appropriate courses of action to improve these areas Z) Solicit interest among the land and/or business mmmeo to partner in establishing a redevelopment authority for the purpose of developing m redevelopment or rehabilitation plan(s) and the means of financing and implementation. 3) identify the intended future character of the redevelopment areas. Subsequently, establish the zoning provisions necessary to achieve the intended development outcomes. 4) Determine the appropriate zoning of in08 development tracts and initiate rezoning as appropriate. Zoning actions should be in accordance with the Future Land Use Plan, and cane must be taken ta ensure that the neighborhood character is preserved and compatibility with existing uses isobserved. 5) Review and amend the City's development ordinances iu identify and resolve regulatory impediments to infi|| development, redevelopment, and revitalization. Incorporate standards that are unique and applicable tu these sites. Action and Initiatives 1) Prepare a master plan for the Greater Downtown area The purpose of the plan is 10 establish a dear and collectively supported vision and them an implementation framework to guide reinvestment and new investment in the Greater Downtown area of La Porte, including the areas of Main Street and Sylvan Beach. This plan should build off the City's revitalization initiatives in Downtown (e.g, Five Points Town Plaza, the San Jacinto off-street trail/sidewalk, and the City/County improvements at Sylvan Beach), identifying opportunities to bolster Downtown as an attractive and lightly functional center o{activity based on its unique assets. The plan should identify the appropriate land uses and the arrangement and form ofdeve|npmen1/nedeve|opmemt along with well-planned and designed improvements to streets and parking areas, vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation, streetscepmtho amenities, signage, lighting, and infrastructure upgrades. lm addition, this master plan should: a) Assess the constraints to redevelopment and the effective use of Downtown properties and buildings. Such factors as |emd and buildings ownership, traffic and pedestrian circulation, perking, building sizes, building code issues (such as ADAaccessibl|ity), lease rates, and other contributing factors should be addressed in the plan. b) Address the fringe and/or transitional areas immediately adjacent 10 identify measures to secure their integrity. u) Include details on the use of design elements and unifying treatments (could include vvayfinding dgma8e), in addition to the gateway monuments, to demarcate the boundaries of this area so that itis distinguished from other areas of the community. 2) Revise regulatory provisions in the Main Street District to ensure new development creates am urban character. This could include: a) Modifying the Maim Street purpose statement to include an intent of creating human-scaled urban character environment comprised of mixed uses. b) Specifying front yard setback provisions as build-to lines, rather than an "average of the existing structures on that side of the street on the same side nf the street ur the setback of the closest structure on DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 revenues. A COMNA (IN I I Y V I � I() N FOR [A r TFXA� 2010 U P DATF location, another consideration is the design of neighborhoods. The areas that were developed in the late 1960s (with the Spenwick Subdivision) departed from the established town settlement patterns near the core ofthe City. New housing development and redevelopment needs to reflect a growing demand for neighborhmod-sty|e patterns that are once again, integrated into the existing fabric of the community. Key Planning Considerations Key planning considerations for ensuring quality neighborhoods and housing include: 1) Addressing "life cycle" housing needs 2% 11% by offering a wider range of housing types and price ranges so that residents can make lifestyle transitions as they age (e.g., from "starter" housing into a larger dwelling to accommodate a family, then into an "empty nester" situation, and finally into a down-sized space and/or "assisted living" or full- time care facility as health conditions 2) Encouraging mixed-use, compact, and pedestrian-oriented developments that can serve the "node" function desired by residents and include types of amenities currently absent in La Porte (e.g., walkable residential/commercial mixed use areas). 3) Emphasizing neighborhood integrity and protection as both housing structures and streets and other local infrastructure continue to age. 4) Using character-based planning and zoning methods, which emphasize quality, compatible development. Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and initiatives address the specific issues and needs identified during the public participation process (and outlined im Chapter 2, Plan Contewf. GOAL 3: Protect the integrity of existing neighborhoods. Neighborhoods are one of La Porte's greatest assets as they Xonn a foundation for a sound quality of life. Strengthening neighborhoods through organization, communication, coordination, and education is a key for maintaining and improving livable neighborhood environments. Established, stable neighborhoods must he preserved and protected from encroaching incompatible development while new neighborhoods should be developed in accordance with Smart Growth and community character principles detailed throughout this plan. in essence, neighborhoods that are safe, vve||- ma|ntained and are ofo quality, enduring character, will maintain property � Built %QO5orlate M Built 2000 to 2004 ?, Built 1990 to 1999 Pil Built 1S8Qmu188g �Built 1970cu1g79 �Built 196Omrprior DRAFT SEPTEMBED'2.20l1 values and thus, asound neighborhood environment and stable residential tax base. The City can greatly enhance the quality of life for its citizens by enacting ordinances and incentives to protect and enhance the integrity of its neighborhoods. Mechanisms to improve the quality afneighborhoods may include ordinances focused on neighborhood conservation; provision of improved or updated public facilities and services such as streets, sidewalks, trails, neighborhood parks, street lighting, drainage systems, pedestrian amenities, traffic control, neighborhood policing and fire protection; enforcement of codes and ordinances; providing support for the creation or the organization of qualified neighborhood organizations by providing technical assistance with private restrictions and/or conducting special neighborhood studies (including redevelopment and/or rehabilitation plans); providing funds for neighborhood improvements, and, generally investing or reinvesting in the community's neighborhoods. One of the most effective ways 10 protect neighborhood integrity bthrough the implementation of neighborhood conservation districts. As detailed later in this chapter, the existing neighborhoods that are envisioned as remaining stable over the 2O-year planning horizon are reflected on the Future Land Use Plan as Neighborhood Conservation (NC). Within an amended zoning ordinance shso|& then be corresponding descriptions as to prevailing lot sizes, setbacks, floor area, and other criteria with by-right provisions allowing certain house or property improvements to enable (and encourage) reinvestment. The purpose of these NC districts |stopreserve neighborhood character and establish standards consistent with those at the time of development so that nonconforming situations are not created. Actions and Initiatives 1) Identify established neighborhoods with cohesive character and community identity and create neighborhood conservation districts to protect and promote the existing neighborhood feel. In addition, aUmm for reasonable improvements in these existing neighborhoods without cumbersome variance procedures. Include by-right standards for making improvements to buildings to ensure that they remain in character with the neighborhood and do not adversely impact the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties. 2) Consider an annual registration of neighborhood, home-owner, and tenant associations so that updated contact information can be maintained and used to disseminate important community-wide information (including such things as nearby development applications or rezonimgs, capital improvement projects, and applicable ordinance changes). 3) Consider formalizing a neighborhood-oriented planning program to: Actions and Initiatives 1) Encourage redevelopment in target areas through programs that target lots that are abandoned or have recently demolished structures so that those lots are put back onto the market and tax rolls. A C( M1 M UN I I )" VI � R ),N R ) P\ 1 A POP, I F 'I EW - 20 1 0 1 J 1 [')A'[ L DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 A CONAMUN I IN disk - 101", 1A PORI F - ("FXM '2010 UIT)A Il Community Affairs and helps low-income persons, particularly the elderly and persons with special needs, control their home energy costs. Local organizations need additional support so that more weetherbotion improvement options are made available. The City may also actively support these local organizations by partnering with them on grant applications or hosting vveatherizatlon open houses or organizing energyeM1dencymudits. 1-0) Continue to apply for Community Development Block Grant (CBDG) funds, HOME Grant funds, nr other grant or loan programs to create or rehabilitate affordable housing for low-income households. 11.) Continue to coordinate with and help to promote housing assistance programs of the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation and the Harris County Community Development Agency. GOAL 5: Ensure affordable and sufficient housing options in the future. The availability and affordability of different housing options leads to a higher quality of life, In general, as more types and affordable housing options are supplied, a greater number uf residents will be able to live and work in La Porte. Therefore, anticipating and meeting future housing demand is essential for the City's economic development success, and planning will enable the community to respond effectively to the needs of a variety of market segments, from young singles and newly married couples 1u large families, empty nesters, seniors, and retirees looking todowmsize. The City currently has a narrow range of owner-occupied neighborhoods and housing types with the current mix being predominantly single-family detached residential dwellings. Indeed, as displayed in the Demographic Snapshot in Chapter 1, La Porte has the highest percentage of one-unit structures (84 percent), which is higher than all the comparison cities, the county, and the state. This leaves |b1|e room for choice among housing types. In the future, aging residents may desire to have more housing options available, including maintenance free condominiums and additional assisted living and continuing care facilities. In addition, units marketable to households that are "downsizing" should be permitted and encouraged in appropriate locations. Examples of these varied units are depicted in the inset, which may include duplexes, patio homes, tuwnhomes, and multiplexes. This does not mean that there is not a market for single-family homes/ rather, it means that future development should incorporate more housing diversity snthat existing and future residents will have sufficient options, from large lot single-family dwellings, to residential above retail lofts, live/work units, and attached living. Lack uf affordability ba concern. When there ba lack of affordable housing options available, it increases individual and/or family distress and is considered to have negative effects on a community's overall health. The City recognizes the need to ensure that all of La Purte's residents enjoy A (_ ( )k{iMUN|RylHUNF0K[6I'dR]E.TFXA� 2fflUUP1)A'1 E DR-AFT SEPTEMB E P, 2, 2011 access to quality and affordable housing within livable and UMPOWIM71W MR 1)Encour 8e life-cyc|e housing options in new developments that will offer alternatives to existing and future residents. New attractive environments. Maintaining livability as the City transitions toanimfiU and redevelopment focus will require creativity and a willingness to coordinate efforts. The qualities that make La Porte on attractive place to live are also making La Porte an expensive place to live. Increasing housing prices creates obstacles for low- income households and threatens to push residents to ---�— umuai|yƒudory housing options. The inability tmfind housing locally -- poses a hardship for households seeking an affordable home, as well es employers seeking employees, UMPOWIM71W MR 1)Encour 8e life-cyc|e housing options in new developments that will offer alternatives to existing and future residents. New development and redevelopment should include more than one housing type, with ordinance provisions for increased open space as separation and buffering and other standards to ensure compatibility. A combination of housing options and lot sizes will resultinadiversityofhumsingchoices —oboicesthatvvU|beusefm| in attracting and keeping singles, younger families, and older residents. Z)[mosider incorporating accessory dwelling units in the zoning ordinance, along with appropriate provisions governing their use � and compatibility. They are common and increasing in popularity in many communities to accommodate elderly parents or relatives (i.e, "granny flats"), young adult family members wanting to live independently but close by, or students in need *f basic, low-cost housing. 3)Adopt design standards for high-density residential development, which may include provisions for building form and scale, articulated building walls, building orientation, architectural detailing, roof types and materials, fa�ade enhancements, and acceptable building materials, as well as site design standards regarding landscape surface, parking location and arrangement, bmfferymrds, and site amenities. 4)Esia6|ish an average, rather than minimum, lot size in the residential districts whereby lot sizes are required to very in width, with a certain percentage being narrower and the remaining being wider than the average. For example, the average lot size may allow u variability uf1G percent (see inset on next page). 5)|nappropriate locations where increased open space is desired ur needed to preserve resource features (e.g. wetland, tree stand, drainage channel) or to protect compatibility between adjacent developments, allow flexible site design and |ovv impact development options that permit alternative treatment mfutilities and infrastructure. There can be significant cost savings to development from flexible site ` design and duster development techniques, ��^",`�� which translate into reduced lot and huuse r em phcas(e.g, reduced Nnearfeet ofntreetpipe, . wr� `� `'�U, -'LL AVERAGE ARGE / Focus Area 3— Enhanced Community Character The appearance of La Porte is the single most evident glimpse of its economic vitality, government pmum'tiveness, and civic pride. The initial impression is formed by the quality of development, property upkeep, condition of public facilities, amount and quality ofpublic DRAFT SEPTEMBER2,2011 spaces, and the design of roadways and other public buildings and infrastructure. Visual appeal reinforces the quality uf life for those who reside in La Porte, as well as those making investment decisions. A character-based approach focuses on the development intensity, which encompasses the density and layout of residential development; the scale and fumn of non-residential development; and the amount of building and pavement coverage (i.e., impervious coverage) relative tm the extent of open space and natural vegetation or landscaping. This applies both on individual development sites and across entire areas. it is this combination of basic land use and the characteristics of such use that more accurately determines the real compatibility and quality of development, as opposed to land use alone. For instance, both Main Street and Fairmont Parkway have restaurants (i.e, the same use); however, when patronizing a restaurant along Main Street, one encounters a more pedestrian-friendly environment with sidewalks, gridded streets, buildings brought mostly to the street, and on-street parking. In contrast, when patronizing a restaurant along Fairmont Parkway, one encounters a more auto-oriented environment where there are no sidewalks (or they are sporadic) and buildings are set back behind off -street parking (see inset for an example of the same residential use exhibiting three different characters). Finally, aesthetic enhancements such as the design of buildings, landscaping and screening, sign control, and site amenities also contribute to enhanced community character. Key Planning Considerations Key planning considerations for enhancing community character include: 1) Pursuing opportunities to create unique, signature areas in the community (particular destinations, corridors, public facilities, parks and open space areas). 2) Enhancing first impression and "front door" appearance by focusing on the aesthetic treatments at community entries. 3) Coordinating gateway improvements so that a consistent, high quality appearance exists at all entry points to the City. 4) Enhancing wayfinding, not only to help residents and visitors navigate the community and find its key destinations, but also as a unifying design element across the City, 5) Improving the appearance of the City's primary corridors so that an enhanced 'image of the City is created. 6) Amending the zoning ordinance to repurpose and recalibrate its districts and standards to reflect their intended community character outcomes. Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and initiatives address specific issues and needs identified during the public participation process ( and outlined in Chapter 1, Plan Context). GOAL 6 Enhance the overall appearance of the built environment in the City. To be fully effective in achieving the community's vision for the future, proactive efforts must be undertaken to improve the appearance of the built environment within the City. Unfortunately, the needs often outweigh the financial or administrative resources available to achieve the desired outcomes. Therefore, it is recognized that there are areas of La Porte that are more visible and, thus, may serve as a "starting point" to initiate these enhancement efforts. A j N I IN V1 � 101 1, R)R_ L A V01\0 1, 1 FXA� - 2010 U I'l )A I F DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2.20D Actions and Initiatives 1) Expand the efforts started with Ordinance 1501-11 (which was intended, partly, as a means to mitigate the visual impacts of container yards) to require existing non-conformities' in designated enhancement corridors to be brought into compliance over a reasonable period of time. Similar provisions have been adopted elsewhere in Texas where nonconforming site conditions (e.g, parking lot landscaping and screening outdoor storage and display, fencing, buffering, siAmm8e, etc.) must be registered with the City and steadily brought into compliance over e period ofyears. 2) Outside ofCity limits, partner with the entities in which the City has imterUoca| agreements to determine strategies to increase the level of screening of container yards that exist along the City's entry corridors and periphery. 3> Consider the development of corridor enhancement plans for the primary and secondary enhancement corridors depicted in Map 2.2, Beautification. (Additional guidance can he found /n Chapter 4, Community Mobility. 4) Enhance the appearance of properties adjacent tustreet corridors by evaluating and improving codes and standards for better building placement (bmild~tn, maximum vs. minimum setbacks), design (building shape, wall articulation, entry identification, transparency, 300 degree architecture), and materials; improved parking lot, stneetscape and foundation landscaping; higher quality screening of outdoor storage; management of outdoor display; improved lighting and sign controls; and improved buffering uf adjacent properties. S) Expand on previous efforts to consider embellished gateway treatments with more significant "signature" monuments, landscaping, and lighting at the locations of greatest visibility. Ensure high quality maintenance of these areas, as depicted nn Map 2.2, Beautification Plan. Draft 98.31.11 6) Modify existing codes to adopt appropriate design standards in conformance with the San Jacinto Corridor Design Standards. 7) Continue to work with the Economic Alliance Houston Port Region and consider code modifications and other program support to implement the San Jacinto Historic District design standards, including the Project Stan Initiative, which uses industrial infrastructure and landscaping to highlight and celebrate the area's history and historical si0nifixanue. C) Consider implementing a program to publicly recognize residential and business property owners for their role toward enhancing the visual appearance cf the City. This could include monthly recognition an the City's uxebsitc or other public communication media. B) Partner with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to enhance the visual appearance of the Cm/x existing and future overpasses, as depicted on Map 2.2, Beautification -'-- 10) Continue seeking public/public and/or public/private partnerships to master plan and implement site specific enhancements throughout the City. By *my of example, continue working with the La Porte Independent School District (|SD) and adjacent retail center owners %o implement the enhancements depicted in the Texas Avenue Beautification Project Master Plan, among others. 11) Partner with TxDOTto enhance the visual appearance of the Miller Cut Off Road, Sens Road, and SR 146 interchange areas. These enhancements could be similar in type and quality to the improvements already completed at the State Highway 225/independence Parkway interchange located just outside City limits, mu depicted on Map 2.2, Beautification Plan. 12) Create a comprehensive vvayfinding program 10 project a consistent image for the entire City and to provide directional guidance to the area's greatest assets, i.e., Maio Street and Sylvan Beech. Partner with TxDQT to develop and obtain approval for a VVayf|mdinASiAn Guide System Plan. 13) Evaluate program criteria and make necessary improvements to achieve certification through the Scenic City Certification Program. Sponsored by Scenic Texas, this certification recognizes Texas municipalities that implement high-quality scenic standards for public roadways and public spaces, with the long-term goal ofimproving the image of all cities. ' Economic Alliance Houston Port Region. San Jacinto Texas, Historic District Corridor Standards athttp:/4mwe.ci]a- porte.tx,us/civica/filebanl</blobdload.asp?BloblD=8725. May 2010. �� =" DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2. 2011 14) Evaluate program criteria and make necessary improvements to gain recognition in the Tree City USA Program. Sponsored by the Arbor Day Foundation, this program helps communities become better stewards of their tree resources, housing type in a neighborhood or mixed housing development, A CONAMLJNI VISION FOR LA POIZAT TFXAS 2010 LIMATE such as a mixed use center m/traditional neighborhood development (THD). 6) For the purposes of procedural streamlining and to better focus the appropriate locations of uses, restrict the types and numbers of allowable conditional uses. For those uses with performance standards, make them a limited use whereby they are administratively permitted subject to written standards, G) Amend the ordinance to include bufferyard provisions for ensuring improved compatibility between adjacent areas of different character. The bwfferyardn must vary according 10 the intensity of abutting development, with a range of options (including combinations of buffer width, plant density, earthen berms, and fencing) tu meet specified standard of opacity. This would provide adequate buggering of adjacent uses as well ex street corridors. The existing provisions only specify a 25 foot buffer between multi-family and single family residential developments without any specification as to the type of density of landscaping. 7) Establish a minimum open space ratio ([)SR) within residential development and landscape surface ration (LSR)wbhin nonresidential development, The ratios will vary according to the character mfthe district. These areas will provide visual buffering and shade, accommodate recreational amenities, and provide needed space for stormwa1erdetentiom. DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2.2Q11 Existing Park Inventory The foundation for establishing an adequate park and rocmaa1inm system is the availability and condition of the existing parks and recreation areas, Tn assess the projected future need for additional land, facilities, and improvements, it is essential to first determine the level of service provided Focus Area 4 — Adequate Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Parks and recreation facilities are an essential part of a healthy, Parks Acres quality, and vibrant community environment. They provide the 14t Street Park 24 necessary components for events outside the home and after Bay Oaks Park 70enMead7ows7 1,2 work and after school activities, Whether for passive or active use, parks and recreation facilities are an important factor of Brookglen Park 2 everyday living, active living — serving health benefits for children, Central Park 4.6 seniors, and people of all ages. The park system also enhances the Creekmont Park 35 community's "quality of life" factor, boosting economic 8.13 development efforts to recruit and retain a skilled workforce; Ohio Street 0.93 build a strong tax base to finance system expansion, facility Pete Gilliam 12 enhancements, and maintenance; and attract retirees. Pfeiffer 1.2 It is clear that La Porte places high value on its park and Pine Bluff 0.11 recreation system. Subsequent to the last comprehensive Seabreeze 3.13 planning process, in 1998, the City prepared and adopted a Spenwick 0.5 separate Parks and Open Space Master Plan (2002; amended Tom Brown 0.57 2008) and Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail Implementation Plan Woodfalls 8.3 (2003); both of which the City has been actively implementing in Neighborhood Park the over the past several years. This section of the Comprehensive Subtotal 37.77 Plan is not intended to supplant those separate specific master plans; rather it is intended to review those plans in terms of how they currently fit within the overall framework of a 20-year Par4s Acres planning horizon—meaning, will the full implementation of those Fairmont Park 17.7 plans achieve the goals of creating a park, recreation, and open Little Cedar Bayou 34,7 space system that is high quality (safe and well maintained), convenient and accessible (to its users), diversified (in its Lomax 10 activities), and interconnected (to the community), while trying to Northside Park 2.7 preserve and protect La Porte's natural assets. Note that while Northwest 25 trails are an integral part of a park and recreation system, they Pecan Park 33 are an equally important part of the City's non-vehicular mobility Community Park system, and as such, will be discussed in Chapter 4, Community 123.1 Subtotal Mobility. Total 160.87 The City Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the operation and maintenance of all parks and recreational facilities. Their ultimate goal is to "to provide and manage superior parks and recreational facilities, innovative programs, and services that will provide our customers with pleasure and enrichment." Existing Park Inventory The foundation for establishing an adequate park and rocmaa1inm system is the availability and condition of the existing parks and recreation areas, Tn assess the projected future need for additional land, facilities, and improvements, it is essential to first determine the level of service provided by the existing parks and recreation system. Subsequently, the level of sufficiency or deficiency of the existing system can be determined to asses the current need prior to projecting the future perky and recreation system needs. Currently, the Department is responsible for 20 neighborhood and community parks (comprising almost 200 acres), two special use parks (i.e., Five Points Town Plaza and the Bayforest Golf Course), and eleven miles of trails (see Table 2.1, Existing Parks and Map 2.3, Park Inventory). Overall, the City has a total of 22 parks and recreation facilities comprised of playgrounds and playscapes; picnic amenities; baseball, softball, soccer, football fields; basketball and other sports courts; bicycle/pedestrian/exercise/nature trails; a senior center; a Special Populations Center; two bayside parks; two fishing piers; a rodeo/open riding arena; three neighborhood pools and one sprayground/playground; and other amenities. Over the past 21 Bayside Terrace Park years, the City has spent close to $18 million on its parks and Fairmont East recreation system. fFairmont 7West Parks and Recreation Standards Standards provide a measure for determining the amount of parks, recreation and open space needed io meet the current and projected future demands of the City's citizens and visitors. Parks and recreation standards are typically expressed in terms of acres of land dedicated for parks, recreation and open space per unit of population, such asO.5 acre per 1 persons. VVN|e general standards are useful, it is important to establish standards that are based upon unique local considerations, such as participation trends and projections, user characteristics, demographics, climate, natural environment, and other cmmdderatkoms. Values related to leisure and recreation are unique to each municipality; therefore, the standards should represent the interests and desires of local pa rks users. The suggested standards from the 0a4|mna| Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), as modified for La Porte's unique conditions, are illustrated in Table, 2.3,08RP4 Development Standards, (on next page) 1.18 2.59 2.35 DRAFT SEPTEMBER. 2, 2011 A COMMUNITY VISION 1 "OR L/k PORTE,TEXAS 2010UPDATE Needs Assessment To assess the adequacy of the existing parks and recreation supply, it is necessary to look at existing population, the supply ufparks provided by existing facilities including planned improvements or expansions, and relate them to planning standards for desirable levels of service. In addition, it is necessary to consider forecasts in future population to determine future needs and to identify deficiencies to address the needs of the system. As such, the park and recreation system would have to be expanded to accommodate 2030 projected population of 49,927 person S4 Based upon these parameters and displayed in Table 2.4, Parks and Recreation Needs, the City would have taadd approximately 12.16 acres of new neighborhood parks and 26.88 acres of new community par to meet the needs of the projected future population. 33.80 1 37.77 1 -3.97 1 105% 1 4993 1 37�77 1 12.16 1 75.6% 101/40 | 123.18 | '21J | 121% U 149�78 | 123.10 | 26.68 U 82.1% ^ Population projections are based off of the Houston-Galveston Area Council (H' G4C ) 2085 Forecast Data. See Demographic Snapshot in Chapter z Plan Context for more information. DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2201l Service Areas Evaluating service areas is an effective means of identifying geographic areas that have sufficient pork areas available, but more importantly to identify those in need of additional parks and recreation areas and facilities. Neighborhood parks have a service area of one-quarter (Y4) mile, while community parks have a service area of one mile; which means that the majority of the persons who utilize these facilities live within those respective distances. The service areas for the City's parks are displayed in Map 2.4,Park Service Areas. Since private parks also provide neighborhood- scale park and recreation benefits to City residents, their service areas have been included in this analysis. While school parks have not been included in this analysis, they too could be included if the City and La Porte ISD formalize joint use agreements and these playground and other amenities are open to the public outside of school operating hours. Park System Plan The La Porte Perk System Man is designed to meet the requirements of the Texas Parks and VV|N|ife Department (TPVVD) in order to become eligible for grant reimbursement of up to 50 percent (with a maximum of $500,000 per application cycle) for qualified projects. With the City being proactive in adopting separate Parks and Open Space and Trails master plan, these requirements have been met. Map 2.5, Panf System Plan, is intended to be an intermediary analysis that will facilitate future discussion when those separate master plans are updated. As the City moves forward in expanding park acreage to meet the needs of the future projected population, the ParkSystenn Man delineates the areas of deficiencies vvi1h|m the City and should be one of the primary considerations used tm identify where future neighborhood and community parks are located. Key Planning Considerations Key planning considerations for ensuring adequate parks, recreation, and open space include: 1) AN people should have equal access to recreational areas activities, services and facilities regardless of personal interest, age, gender, income, cultural background, housing environment, orhandicap. Z) Public recreation should he highly coordinated among public institutions and private entities to avoid duplication and encourage cooperation. 3) Public recreation should incorporate public services such as education, health and fitness, transportation, and leisure. 4} Facilities should be well-planned and coordinated to ensure adequate adaptability to future needs and requirements. Graf[ 06.31.11 Draft 08.31 5) The availability of financial resources should be considered in all phases of planning, acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of spaces and facilities. 6) Public participation is critical to the eventual success of the parks and recreation system and should, therefore, be included in all stages of the process. 7) There should be established procedures for acquiring land for future parks and recreation areas and facilities prior todevelopment, 8) The design of spaces and facilities should encourage the most efficient utilization of land, accommodate other compatible City services (e.g., libraries, museums, etc.), be constructed in the most sustainable, highest quality possible, and consider the needs and desires of the intended users, Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and initiatives address the specific issues and needs identified during the public participation process and the above analysis. Actions and Initiatives 1) Establish aforndbed parks-to-standards program to ensure all parks are brought up to, and maintained |n, an equivalent quality standard. This program should include a general maintenance and repair schedule. The priority maintenance tasks include: a) Resurfacing, res hping,orna1gradimgunpavodsurfacesmr parking areas. b) Improving drainage. c) Increasing park accessibility. d) Increasing the amount of signagm and/or repair of existing signage. 2) Conduct regular risk management inspections to identify and schedule repairs, address safety issues, and conduct routine maintenance and dcamimQ, and other necessary improvements to playground and park equipment that is funded byom adequate operating and maintenance budget. 3) Use the National Program and Playground Safety guidelines and/or the United States Consumer Products Safety DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 Commission standards in the design and replacement of playground equipment, all surface areas, and other recreational facilities and improvements. 4) Enhance landscape plantings and lawn maintenance in all parks. a) Develop a program to improve the turf quality in all parks through turf restoration and over seeding, re-grading (to address erosion and drainage 'issues), and improved irrigation. b) Continue to partner with Trees for Houston to add shade trees and shrubs in each park to improve aesthetics, create much needed shade, and improve the overall future beauty of the park system. 5) Conduct an annual condition assessment of park conditions. The assessment should be considered during the budget preparation process for the following fiscal year. GOAL 9: Continue to increase the quality and diversity of amenities in the existing and future parks to attract and accommodate people of all ages (and non-traditional park users) for both active and passive activities. A C:M4MUNI tTY Vt S ION B LA P01CFE, I - 2010 U PDATE more shade and more opportunities for socialization, among other things). 6) Improve on-site and off-site accessibility to each park by developing a sidewalk improvement program to repair, replace, or install new sidewalks, crosswalks, and curb outs, in high pedestrian use neighborhoods immediately surrounding the parks, schools, and other community facilities. a) Incorporate on-site handicap accessible walking trails that create loop around the edge of each park and connect the important amenities within the park, so that users can utilize these trails for walking, running, biking, roller b|odhng, pushing strollers, among other things. 7) Continue to provide adequate funding in the annual capital and operating budgets toenhance, improve, and maintain the existing public parks, recreation, trails, and open space. GOAL 10: Continue to add new park, recreation, and open space areas to adequately accommodate the future needs of La Porte's residents and visitors. Action and Initiatives 1) Consider establishing an excise tax applied to nonresidential uses on e square foot basis, which will serve tn generate additional revenue for the purpose mf expanding and improving the City's parks and trails systems. 2) Concurrent with population growth, acquire an additional 12.16 acres of neighborhood perNamd and an additional 26.68 acres of community parkland in the areas of deficiency by the year 2030. Additional acreage could be used to: a) Establishing arecreation fitness center on the west side of the City. b) Constructing a natatorium built and financed through a joint City ba Porte and/or Clear [reek |3D partnership (or other interested stakeholders). c) Facilitating greater linear linkages between the existing trail system and all parks, schools, neighborhoods, open spaces, and other important community amenities, 3} Continue to provide adequate funding imthe annual capital budget to acquire and develop new park, recreation, trail, and open space areas and improvements. GOAL 11: Continue to offer and expand recreational and or cultural programs that meet the interests and needs of persons of all ages and abilities by providing programs independently and in cooperation with partners. DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2.201l Action and Initiatives l) Provide opportunities for individuals and groups (including |ow-income, minority, disabled, elderly, and the youth at risk populations) to participate in cultural, recreational, and educational activities that foster better health and wellness and strengthen both body and mind. 2) Formalize through reciprocal agreements the coordination of programming and joint use uf facilities by and between the City and the La Porte Independent School District (iSD)' homeowner associations, among others. 3) Continue tu offer and/or enhance the Fun Times Parks and Recreation Magazine. 4) Consider providing on-line registration for any camps, lessons, workshops, mr classes available through the City nr its program partners. 5) Join with the program partners to make application for outside funding to support and expand The City's educational and recreational programming. Seek special funding for underprivileged residents (particularly children) who may not have access to pools for programs that would address need for swimming lessons in the bay. 6) Continue to expand sponsorships and investigate opportunities to affiliate with other agencies (i.e., public/public or public/private partnerships), special interest groups, service dubs, and the private sector in organizing and operating special events, programs, and leagues. 7) Continue to work with youth sport associations to further develop facilities for recreational activities including baseball, softball, basketball, soccer, football, rugby, swimming, among others. 8) Continue to work with public and private sector groups (i.e, civic associations, etc.) to promote the annual community activities such as sports tournaments, festivals, outdoor concerts, fairs, and other special events. 9) Conduct an annual meeting with the City's program partners and other community organizations to discuss opportunities for the improved coordination and provision ofservices. Future Land Use and Character The essence ofcomprehensive planning is a recognition that Le Porte dues not have tu wait to react to development proposals. Rather, b can determine where development and redevelopment will occur and what character the new built environment will reflect. Through active community support, this plan will ensure that development meets certain standards and, thus, contributes to achieving the desired community character. As a guide for land development and public improvements, Map 2.7, Future Land Use Plan, DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 represents how and where the City will focus new development and redevelopment over the next two decades — and beyond. The Future Land Use Nam is an |mtogm| part of this Comprehensive Plan and represents the most desirable land use based upon the goals and objectives stated in the Comprehensive Plan in consideration mf existing uses and development and physical characteristics of the community. The land use designations form the basis for zoning, and thereby, the location of housing, commercial, and industrial areas. The Future Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan (in Chapter 4, Mobility) are the two most important planning tools available to the City, im the determination of whether a specific zoning classification conforms tn the land use designation on the map, flexibility should be used to interpret land use designations boundaries which are applied on a broad scale, Street rights-a+way, lot lines, topography, and other features should be utilized in the location uf appropriate zoning district boundary lines. Generally, zoning district boundaries should follow near |o1 lines or alleys to preserve the cohesiveness of the stneetsmape and compatibility mf adjacent uses. Zoning, when applied, breaks these areas into more specific classifications with legally binding land use regulations that according tostate law must be "in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan."" The following discusses the land use designations found in the Future Land Use Plan. Character Districts Rural. This designation is for areas with large acreages (scattered homesteads and pasture land) and very large lot developments, K may also include clustered residential development that is offset by high percentage of open space on the overall tract. Rural character is usually found in areas on the fringe of the City where infrastructure (i.e., curb and gutter, sewer, etc.) may be less intensive than other areas of the City. Rural character typically exhibits: w Wide open landscapes, with no sense of enclosure, and the views to the horizon are unbroken by buildings. * Structures are in the background —or invisible entirely uu they blend into the landscape. * Very high open space ratios and very low building coverage. m Greater building separation providing privacy and detachment from neighboring dwellings. w Much greater reliance on natural drainage systems, w Amone pleasant environment for walking and biking, especially for off- street 1rai|systerns. ' Texas Local Government Code Sec. 211.004 Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Suburban Residential. This designation is for areas that include detached residential dwellings; planned developments (to provide other housing types, e.Q,attached residential, with increased open space),etc. Suburban Residential character typically exhibits: m A high degree of open space maintained on the site. * Larger lot sizes to allow for larger front yards and building setbacks. w Greater side separation between homes. * Less noticeable accommodation of the automobile (especially where driveways are on the side of homes rather than occupying a portion of the front yard space, and where garages are situated to the side orrear of the main dvve|Uog). w |m some case, Suburban Residential can accommodate smaller lot sizes in exchange for greater open space, with the additional open space devoted to maintaining the Suburban character and buffering adjacent properties. Auto Urban Residential. This designation also includes detached residential dwellings; attached housing types (subject to compatibility and open space standards, e.g., duplexes, townhomes, patio homes); planned developments (with a potential mix of housing types and varying densities, subject 10 compatibility and open space standards), etc. Auto Urban Character typically exhibits: 0 Less openness and separation between dwellings compared to Suburban Y Z r7l Traditional Residential. This designation covers many of the core single- family residential neighborhoods within East La Porte. The prevailing lot size allows for less openness and separation between homes than in Suburban and Rural residential areas. Traditional Residential character areas typically exhibit: ° Mature tree canopies; which help to differentiate these areas from Auto- Urban Residential areas. DDUAFT3EyTEMU&EB2.20l1 * Highly Qhdded streets, oftentimes with alleys. m Incremental increases in housing density and lot coverage; enough to differentiate from corresponding Suburban Residential areas. Suburban Village. This designation includes mixed use (on single sites and within individual structures), attached residential dwellings (pns | bly live/work units), commercial retail, office, etc Rather than linear strips, these village centers will have much smaller building footprints and typically cater towards neighborhood conveniences such as drug stores, professional services, and retail users. Given the expected increases in population constrained by the limited areas remaining for development, it is recommended that La Porte consider facilitating the development of some of the remaining areas as more self-contained, mimed use villages. Suburban Village character areas typically exhibit: * High degree of landscape surface than found imAuto'Urban character areas. * Pedestrian-oriented setting and more walkable environments. * Higher site coverage, where a m\mlmmnm two-stury structures are encouraged. w Reliance on on-street parking, centralized public parking, and where feasible, structured parking. Auto Urban Commercial. Development types include a wide range of Urban Downtown. This character area is different from an Auto-Urban commercial area in that the buildings are brought to the street and there is mnor very limited on-site parking. Buildings within this district occupy a large percentage of the site, and front and side yard setbacks must be built Lothe property line in order to maintain the characteristics of e traditional downtown. Downtown character areas typically exhibit: • Most intensive development character imCity. • Streets framed by buildings with zero/minimal front setbacks, • Greatest site coverage. • Minimum two-story structures encouraged. e Reliance mn on-street parking, centralized public parking, and where feasible, structured parking. * Public/institutional uses designed of an Urban character. Business Park. This designation is typically Suburban im character and primarily is for office, medical, and tech no uses but can also include light industrial (including warehousing/distribution) when well screened and in buildings with enhanced architectural design. Business Parks are a good way 10 attract new companies to the area and could bean attractive alternative the existing facilities available today. Business Park character areas are typically grouped in campus style settings and typically exhibit: • Reduced site coverage and larger areas of common open space. • A minimum open space ratio of2QY6'3O%, which still allows for asizable cumulative building footprint since most such developments involve large sites. • Extensive landscaping of business park perimeter, and special streetscaping and design treatments atentries, key intersections, and internal focal points. • Development outcomes that exceed City ordinances and development standards (because they are often controlled by private covenants and restrictions) • Site operations that are conducted indoors with no outdoor storage mr Auto-Urban Industrial. La Porte'n has been traditionally known as an industrial City, and as such, there are many industrial areas located in and around the City which exhibit an Auto-Urban character. Although, these areas can he enhanced through landscaping and buffering standards, master-planning viz "industrial parks," and optimal site selection. The City's existing industrial buildings are a mix of older and new brick and metal buildings scattered throughout the City. Auto-Urban Industrial character areas typically exhibit: * Predominantly characterized by large parking and storage areas and minimal gneenspace; although some industrial park developments may feature more open space and landscaping, regulated sigmage,screening, etc. m outdoor activity and storage, which should he screened where visible from public ways and buffered from residential areas. It could also include certain publicly owned uses (e.g., public works facilities, fleet maintenance, treatment plants, etc) Parks and Open Space. This designation is for the City's park, recreation, and open space areas and the trail system. Parks are formally developed recreation areas comprised of public parks, trails, and other improved recreational (active and passive) or cultural amenities. Open spaces are less �� �� DKAFTSEPTEMB£(l1.20U developed natural areas typically characterized by sensitive or unique environmental features that may or may not be developed. Typically, public parkland will remain in the public realm in perpetuity with future parkland acquired to fill the gaps and support new development. Park design, intensity of development, and planned uses/activities should match the area character (e.g, Five Points Town Plaza should look different than Pete Gilliam Perk). Parks and Open Space character areas typically exhibit: w Manicured lawns, parking lots and sidewalks, playgrounds, sports courts and sports fields, etc. w Unimproved natural areas or improved to provide limited amenities, e.g, parking, trails, bird blinds, etc. PublicAnsdtudonaL This designation includes the City-owned buildings and facilities (including City Hall and the police and fire stations),ax well asother publicly or privately-owned schools and hospitals, churches and accessory buildings, public parking lots and structures, and other non-governmental civic functions (e.g., Chamber of Commerce). Since these facilities occur throughout the City, they should be designed to be compatible with the character of the surrounding area. irrespective of which character area these facilities are placed, they should still exhibit: ~ High quality, highly durable materials. m Sufficient landscaping and full screening of outdoor storage. * Special stneetscaping and design treatments may be warranted incertain areas.