Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-08-12 Regular Meeting of La Porte City CouncilLOUIS RIGBY Mayor JOHN ZEMANEK Mayor Pro-Tem, Councilmember at Large A DOTTIE KAMINSKI Councilmember at Large B MIKE MOSTEIT Councilmember District 1 CHUCK ENGELKEN Councilmember District 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA DARYL LEONARD Councilmember District 3 TOMMY MOSER Councilmember District 4 JAY MARTIN Councilmember District 5 MIKE CLAUSEN Councilmember District 6 Notice is hereby given of a Regular Meeting of the La Porte City Council to be held October 8, 2012, beginning at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas, for the purpose of considering the following agenda items. All agenda items are subject to action. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION — The invocation will be given by Father Gary Rickles, Saint Mary's Catholic Church. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie Kaminski. 4. PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS and RECOGNITIONS (a) Proclamation — "Domestic Violence Awareness and Prevention Month" — Mayor Rigby 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Limited to five minutes per person.) 6. CONSENT AGENDA (All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be removed and considered separately.) (a) Consider approval or other action regarding the minutes of regular City Council meeting held on September 24, 2012 — P. Fogarty (b) Consider approval or other action to approve city council meeting dates for the months of November and December 2012 as recommended by staff — C. Alexander/P. Fogarty (c) Consider approval or other action regarding an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute the amended Interlocal Cooperation Contract between the City of La Porte and the Texas Department of Public Safety (OMNIBASE) — D. Mitrano (d) Consider approval or other action authorizing the purchase of a Type I Frazer Ambulance Module and an Aero Elite bus through Houston -Galveston Area Council's (H-GAC) cooperative purchasing program — D. Mick (e) Consider approval or other action regarding a resolution adopting a Section 3 Local Opportunity for the projects funded by the Texas Community Development Block Grant Program — T. Tietjens (f) Consider approval or other action authorizing the Police Department to proceed with procurement of Coban systems through Houston -Galveston Area Council — K. Adcox (g) Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with AT&T for Virtual Desktop Integration (VDI) services utilizing DIR Contract # DIR-SDD-646. 7. RESOLUTIONS (a) Consider approval or other action regarding a resolution designating INEOS USA, L.L.C., as a State of Texas Enterprise Zone Project — S. Osborne 8. DISCUSSION OR OTHER ACTION (a) Discussion or other action authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the City of Houston Police Department to assign a detective to the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force — K. Adcox (b) Discussion or other action regarding Dental/Vision Insurance plan for employees — K. Anderson (c) Discussion or other action regarding dangerous buildings/structures — D. Wilmore (d) Discussion or other action regarding possible options for improvements to the Lomax Park — S. Barr 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS (a) La Porte Development Corporation Board Meeting, Monday, October 22, 2012 (b) City Council Meeting, Monday, October 22, 2012 (c) City Council Meeting, Monday, November 12, 2012 (d) Thanksgiving Holidays — Thursday, November 22, 2012, and Friday, November 23, 2012 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information or existing policies — Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Mosteit, Clausen, Martin, Moser and Mayor Rigby. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government Code, including, but not limited to, the following: Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(A) — Pending or Contemplated Litigation — State vs. Port of Houston - Sound Mediation Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(A) — Pending or Contemplated Litigation — Tammy Cooper vs. City of La Porte 12. RECONVENE into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive session. 13. ADJOURN In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees, requests should be received 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019. CERTIFICATION I certify that a copy of the October 8, 2012, agenda of items to be considered by the City Council was posted on the City Hall bulletin board on October 2, 2012. Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary Council Agenda Item October 8, 2012 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION — The invocation will be given by Father Gary Rickles, Saint Mary's Catholic Church. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie Kaminski. 4. PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS and RECOGNITIONS (a) Proclamation — "Domestic Violence Awareness and Prevention Month" — Mayor Rigby 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Limited to five minutes per person.) *********************************************************************************** ro b Q Q q6) b OILI CS O � o ) b b a S o ILI 142 +d o q6) q6) I- 0 a J 0 LOUIS RIGBY Mayor JOHN ZEMANEK Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember at Large A DOTTIE KAMINSKI Councilmember at Large B MIKE MOSTEIT Councilmember District 1 CHUCK ENGELKEN Councilmember District 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 DARYL LEONARD Councilmember District 3 TOMMY MOSER Councilmember District 4 JAY MARTIN Councilmember District 5 MIKE CLAUSEN Councilmember District 6 The City Council of the City of La Porte met in a regular meeting on Monday, September 24, 2012, at the City Hall Council Chambers, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas, at 6:00 p.m. to consider the following items of business: 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Rigby called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Members of Council present: Councilmembers Zemanek, Engelken, Mosteit, Martin, Kaminski, Clausen and Moser. Also present were City Secretary Patrice Fogarty, City Manager Corby Alexander, Assistant City Manager Traci Leach and Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins. Councilmember Leonard was absent. 2. INVOCATION - The invocation was given by Rev. Brian Christen, La Porte Community Church. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Tommy Moser. 4. PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS and RECOGNITIONS (a) Proclamation — "Airport Appreciation Month" — Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby presented the "Airport Appreciation Month" proclamation to Gideon Jones. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Limited to five minutes per person.) Larry Haller, 122 S. 17th, addressed Council in favor of amendments to construction requirements for dust free surfaces. Charles Childress, #1 Bellchase Gardens, Beaumont, TX, addressed Council in favor of Item 7c, reimbursing permit fees paid by La Porte Real Properties in the amount of $24,587.00. Phillip Hoot, 927 Seabreeze, addressed Council opposed to Item 7c, reimbursing permit fees paid by La Porte Real Properties in the amount of $24,587.00 due to the environmental impact adding fill dirt to a property may cause. Mr. Hoot also addressed Council opposed to Item 8a, possible amendments to construction requirements for dust free surfaces due to the item not being discussed by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to being considered by Council. Mark Follis, 831 S. 7th, addressed Council regarding Item 7c, reimbursing permit fees paid by La Porte Real Properties in the amount of $24,587.00. He believes there should be a cap on permit fees paid for a fill dirt permit. In addition, Mr. Follis addressed Council concerning Item 8a, possible amendments to construction requirements for dust free surfaces, and advised Council he was not sure of the definition of a dust free surface and felt the item should be discussed by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to being considered by Council. Page 1 of 7 September 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes 6. CONSENT AGENDA (All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be removed and considered separately.) (a) Consider approval or other action regarding the minutes of regular City Council meeting held on September 10, 2012 — P. Fogarty (b) Consider approval or other action regarding an Interlocal Agreement between Harris County Transit Authority and the City of La Porte for local bus service through October 31, 2013 — T. Leach (c) Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute a Land Lease Agreement with Trees for Houston — S. Barr (d) Consider approval or other action regarding an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a Water Service and Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement with Vigavi Realty LLC., at 11804 Fairmont Parkway, in the Bayport Industrial District— T. Tietjens (e) Consider approval or other action regarding an agreement with AT&T for Hosted Exchange services utilizing DIR Contract No. DIR-SDD-646 — J. Suggs (f) Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with Harris County for the use of Harris County's Public Safety Radio System — K. Adcox (g) Consider approval or other action amending a Resolution that discloses the authority to commit fund balances and set a reserve policy and commit funds for current capital projects — M. Dolby (h) Consider approval or other action regarding an ordinance amending the City of La Porte Development Ordinance by capping fill dirt permit fees for project sites — T. Tietjens Regarding Consent Item 6g, Mayor Rigby removed the item for voting separately. Regarding Consent Item 6d, Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins read the caption of Ordinance 2012-3435: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT AND A SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND VIGAVI REALTY, LLC (11804 FAIRMONT PARKWAY, BAYPORT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT), MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Regarding Consent Item 6f, Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins read the caption of Ordinance 2012-3436: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND HARRIS COUNTY, RELATING TO PAYMENT TERMS FOR THE USE OF THE HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM, MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Councilmember Engelken moved to approve Consent Agenda Items a-f and h, pursuant to recommendations by staff. Councilmember Mosteit seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard Page 2 of 7 September 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Engelken moved to approve Consent Agenda Item G, with an amendment in the body of the Resolution to show adoption is by a majority and not by resolution. Councilmember Mosteit seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard Regarding Consent Item 6g, Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins read the caption of Resolution 2012-10: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS ESTABLISHING FUND BALANCE POLICIES AS REQUIRED BY GASB 54; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. 7. AUTHORIZATIONS/ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS (a) Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Mueller Management for the Planning Department audit — T. Leach Assistant City Manager Traci Leach presented a summary. Alan Mueller and Ron Cox were in attendance at the meeting and provided brief comments. This audit will entail analyzing development processes and City management of those processes. There will be input from the public sector, as well as from developers. Councilmember Engelken moved to authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Mueller Management for a Planning Department audit. Councilmember Martin seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard At this time Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins read the caption of Ordinance 2012-3437, which was adopted under Consent Item 6h, as reading the caption was inadvertently overlooked at the time. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 11.02, DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS, AS ESTABLISHED IN LA PORTE ORDINANCE NO. 1444-A, AND AS AMENDED, REGULATING THE PLATTING OR REPLATTING OF LAND INTO SUBDIVISIONS IN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE; PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON VIOLATING THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE DEEMED GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR AND SHALL UPON CONVICTION BE FINDED IN A SUM OF NOT MORE THAN TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH VIOLATION; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (b) Consider approval or other action authorizing the Parks and Recreation Director to execute an agreement with Robin and Leticia Rollins for continued operation of a Vendor's Market at Five Points Plaza — S. Barr Parks and Recreation Director Stephen Barr presented a summary. Page 3 of 7 September 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Martin moved to authorize the Parks and Recreation Director to execute an agreement with Robin and Leticia Rollins for continued operation of a Vendor's Market at Five Points Plaza. Councilmember Moser seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard (c) Consider approval or other action reimbursing permit fees paid by La Porte Real Properties in the amount of $24,587.00 — T. Tietjens Planning Director Tim Tietjens presented a summary. Councilmember Martin moved to reimburse permit fees paid by La Porte Real Properties in the amount of $24, 587.00. Councilmember Zemanek seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit and Martin Nays: Councilmember Moser Absent: Councilmember Leonard (d) Consider approval or other action regarding proposed Meet and Confer Agreement between the City of La Porte and the La Porte Police Officers' Association — K. Adcox Chief of Police Ken Adcox presented a summary. Councilmember Engelken moved to approve the Meet and Confer Agreement between the City of La Porte and the La Porte Police Officers' Association. Councilmember Zemanek seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard (e) Discussion or other action regarding comprehensive street evaluation — D. Pennell Assistant Public Works Director Don Pennell presented a summary. Councilmember Moser questioned the process for repair of roads after the rating. Assistant Public Works Director Don Pennell responded after the rating of the worst roads, there will need to be a condition assessment and re-evaluation the base and sub -grade. City Manager Corby Alexander commented after the ratings are presented to Council for review, staff will need direction from Council on an approach for moving forward. Councilmember Zemanek questioned if when the evaluation is being performed will Council be advised why the streets failed during the rating. Assistant Public Works Director Don Pennell responded Council will be advised if there is base failure on the roads but not the severity of the base failure. Councilmember Engelken questioned how many City streets vs. the streets in the county will be evaluated. Assistant Public Works Director Don Pennell responded all 125 miles of streets will be evaluated. Page 4 of 7 September 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Moser moved to authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with HDR Engineering Inc., in the amount of $28,670.00 to be funded from the Street Tax (Fund 033) reserve balance. Councilmember Engelken seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard 8. DISCUSSION OR OTHER ACTION (a) Discussion or other action regarding possible amendments to construction requirements for dust free surfaces — T. Tietjens Planning Director Tim Tietjens presented a very brief summary and advised the item was being presented to Council in order to receive general direction. Councilmember Engelken moved to send this item to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration and recommendation of amendments, if any, to construction requirements for dust free surfaces prior to coming back to Council. Councilmember Moser seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard (b) Discussion or other action regarding ordinance establishing guidelines for travel and business expenses by City Council members when attending educational meetings — Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby presented this item for consideration by Council for any questions or suggested changes. Council expressed no comments and posed no amendments to this ordinance which establishes guidelines for travel and business expenses by City Council members when attending educational meetings. (c) Discussion or other action regarding letter of support for the Port of Houston Sunset Advisory Commission — Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby presented a summary. Councilmember Martin moved to send a letter of support for the Port of Houston Sunset Advisory Commission. Clausen seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard (d) Discussion or other action regarding vote for nominees for the Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool Board of Trustees — P. Fogarty Page 5 of 7 September 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes City Secretary Patrice Fogarty presented this item with suggestions for candidates on whom Council may wish to vote. Councilmember Clausen moved to cast the City's vote for Greg Ingham, Place 11, Larry Gilley, Place 12, Byron Black, Place 13 and Michael S. Nyren, Place 14, for TML-IRP Board of Trustees. Martin seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard (e) Discussion or other action appointing members to various boards, commissions and committees — P. Fogarty City Secretary Patrice Fogarty presented this item by asking Council if there were any nominations for the vacancy on the Building Codes Appeals Board and for the Governmental Body's Representative on the Firefighter's Pension Board. Councilmember Zemanek moved appoint Lindsay Pfeiffer, to Position 4, on the Building Codes Appeals Board and John Kling, as the Governmental Body Representative on the Firefighter's Pension Board. Councilmember Moser seconded. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Zemanek, Kaminski, Clausen, Mosteit, Martin and Moser Nays: None Absent: Councilmember Leonard 9. STAFF REPORTS (a) Receive report of Fiscal Affairs Committee — Councilmember Engelken Councilmember Engelken provided a report from the Fiscal Affairs Committee meeting which took place prior to the council meeting. (b) Receive Delinquent Tax Report — Mayor Rigby There were no questions from Council. 10. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS (a) Citizens Charter Review Advisory Commission Meeting, Tuesday, September 25, 2012 (b) Salute to Industry Golf Tournament, Wednesday, October 3, 2012 (c) Salute to Industry Dinner, Thursday, October 4, 2012 (d) City Council Meeting, Monday, October 8, 2012 (e) City Council Meeting, Monday October 22, 2012 City Manager Corby Alexander advised Council that staff will soon be advising of any deficiencies that need to be addressed due to a natural disaster, and he thanked the La Porte Police Officers' Association for working hard and reaching an agreement for the upcoming year. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information or existing policies — Councilmembers Moser, Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Mosteit, Clausen, Martin and Mayor Rigby. Page 6 of 7 September 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Moser expressed his thanks to Habitat for Humanity for assisting citizens in the community; Councilmember Zemanek welcomed Councilmember Kaminski back after being ill; Councilmember Mosteit congratulated the La Porte Police Officers' Association on their agreement and congratulated the recipients of the "Airport Appreciation Month" proclamation; Councilmember Martin thanked La Porte High School students for attending the meeting; and Mayor Rigby expressed his desire to see a large attendance at the Second Annual La Porte Airplane and Auto Show on October 6. He also informed Council he had been advised by State Representative Wayne Smith that he will support Council if they do not favor a heavy haul corridor. 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government Code, including, but not limited to, the following: Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(A) — Pending or Contemplated Litigation — State vs. Port of Houston - Sound Mediation Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(A) — Pending or Contemplated Litigation — Tammy Cooper vs. City of La Porte Texas Government Code, Section 551.074 — Deliberation concerning the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee: Corby Alexander, City Manager City Council recessed the regular meeting to convene an executive session at 7:03 p.m. to discuss the State vs. Port of Houston — Sound Mediation; Tammy Cooper vs. City of La Porte; and the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee: Corby Alexander, City Manager. 13. RECONVENE into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive session. The regular meeting was reconvened at 7:56 p.m. Mayor Rigby commented the item State vs. Port of Houston - Sound Mediation had been postponed until the next meeting due to additional pending information; regarding the item Tammy Cooper vs. City of La Porte, information was received from the Texas Municipal League -appointed attorney; and there were no comments or Council action regarding the item on City Manager Corby Alexander. 14. ADJOURN There being no further business, Councilmember Engelken moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:58 p.m. Councilmember Zemanek seconded. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Respectfully submitted, Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary Passed and approved on October 8, 2012. Mayor Louis R. Rigby Page 7 of 7 September 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested October 8, 2012 Requested By C. Alexander/P. Fogarty City Manager/City Secretary Department: Report: Resolution: Ordinance: Exhibits: Exhibits: Appropriation Source of Funds: Account Number: Amount Budgeted: Amount Requested: Budgeted Item: YES NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION City Council has traditionally held one meeting per month during the months of November and December. Staff recommends the following changes to the regular meetings schedule to accommodate the upcoming holidays: • Conduct regular meeting on November 12, 2012 • Cancel the November 26, 2012, meeting due to the Thanksgiving holidays • Conduct regular meeting on December 10, 2012 • Cancel the December 24, 2012, meeting due to the Christmas holidays Should a need arise to conduct business, a special called meeting would be scheduled. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action of amended meeting dates as follows: • Cancel the November 26, 2012, meeting due to the Thanksgiving holidays • Cancel the December 24, 2012, meeting due to the Christmas holidays Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date Agenda Date Requested: October 8,2012 Requested By: Denise Mitrano Department: Municipal Court Report: Resolution: Ordinance: X I- I Exhibits: Proposed amended Interlocal Cooperation Contract Exhibits: City Ordinance Exhibits Original Ordinance and laterlocal Cooperation -Contract Buftet Source of Funds: N/A Account Number: Amount Budgeted: Amount Requested: Budgeted Item: YES NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION On April 11, 2005, the City of La Porte entered into an Interlocal Cooperation Contract with the Texas Department of Public Safety ("TDPS") to implement the Failure to Appear Program. This program is offered by the Driver License Division under Chapter 706 of the Transportation Code. The City Manager was authorized to sign the original contract. During the 82 nd Legislative Session, Section 706.005 T.C. was amended to require courts to immediately notify TDPS when a persons's driver's license is cleared. Under the original contract, courts are required to report compliance within five business days,. Thus, TDPS has submitted an amended contract reflecting this legislative change. The new language is contained in the last sentence in Section IX, page 3, of the proposed contract. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute the amended. Interlocal Cooperation Contract. Approved for Citv Council Agenda Corby 1). Alexander, City Manager Date "Departments or "TDPSn means the Texas Department of Public Safety: Revised (11104) 2 court receives appropriate payment.or other information that satisfies the citizen's Revised (11/04) 5 Each party may participate in.the defense of a claim -or suit affecting the FTA Program, but no costs or expenses shall be incurred for any party by the other party without the.other parties' written consent. To the extent authorized by law, the local political subdivision agrees to indemnity and hold harmless 'the TDPS against any. ciaims, suits, actions, damages and costs of every nature or description arising out of or resultingfrom the performance of this Contract, and the local political subdivision further agrees to satisfy any final judgement awarded against the local political subdivision or the TDPS arising from the performance of this Contract, provided said claim, suit, action, damage, judgement or related cost is not attributed by the judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction to the sole negligence of the TDPS. it is the agreement of the parties that -any litigation involving the parties to this Contract. may not be compromised or settled without the `express consent of the TDPS, unless. such litigation does not name the TDPS as.a party. This section is subject to the statutory rights and duties of the Attorney General for the State. of Texas. XIV. Contract Modification No modifications, amendments or supplements to, or waivers of, any provision of this Contract shall be valid unless made in writing and executed in the same manner as this Contract. ACV. Severability If any provision. of this Contract. is. held to beill ega. I, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the term hereof, such provision shah be fatly severable. This Contract shalt be construed. and enforced. as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision had never comprised a part hereof, and the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by the. illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision or by its severance therefrom. Revised (11104). 6 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF L.A. FORTE: Section to The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the contract, agreement, or other undertaking described in the title of this ordinance, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Secretary. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute such document and all related documents on behalf of the City of La Porte. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to attest to all such signatures and to affix the seal of the City to all such documents. Section 2. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites, and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and approval, and it is so ordered. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 8th day of October, 2012. Patrice Fogarty City Secretary Cl'-cfrk T. Askins Assistant City Attorney By. Louis R. Rigby Mayor 0 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § This Interlocal Cooperation Contract ("Contract") is made and entered into between the Texas Department of Public Safety ("TDPS"), a political subdivision of the State of Texas, and the of a local political subdivision of the State of Texas. III. Overview The purpose of this Contract is to implement the provisions of Texas Transportation Code Chapter 706. A local political subdivision may contract with the TDPS to provide information necessary to deny renewal of the driver license of a person who fails to appear for a complaint or citation or fails to pay or satisfy a judgment ordering payment of a fine and cost in the manner ordered by the court in a matter involving any offense that a court has jurisdiction of under Chapter 4, Code of Criminal Procedure. The TDPS has authority to contract with a private vendor ("Vendor") pursuant to Texas Transportation Code §706.008. The Vendor will provide the necessary goods and services to establish an automated system ("FTA System") whereby information regarding violators subject to the provisions of Texas Transportation Code Chapter 706 may be accurately stored and accessed by the TDPS. Utilizing the FTA System as a source of information, the TDPS may deny renewal of a driver license to a person who is the subject of an FTA System entry. Each local political subdivision contracting with the TDPS will pay monies to the Vendor based on a fee established by this Contract. The TDPS will make no direct or indirect payments .to the Vendor. The Vendor will ensure that accurate information is available to the TDPS, political subdivisions and persons seeking to clear their licenses at all reasonable times. "Complaint" means notice of an offense as defined in Article 27.14(d) or Article 45.019, Code of Criminal Procedure. Revised (12/11) "Department" or "TDPS" means the Texas Department of Public Safety. "Failure to Appear Program" or "FTA Program" refers to the implementation efforts of all parties, including those system components provided by the TDPS, local political subdivisions and the Vendor, including the FTA System. "Failure to Appear System" or "FTA System" refers to the goods and services, including all hardware, software, consulting services, telephone and related support services, supplied by the Vendor. "FTA Software" refers to computer software developed or maintained now or in the future by the Vendor to support the FTA System. "Originating Court" refers to the court in which an applicable violation has been filed for which a person has failed to appear or failed to pay or satisfy a judgment and which has submitted an appropriate FTA Report, "State" refers to the State of Texas. "Local political subdivision" refers to a city or county of the State of Texas. Unless otherwise defined, terms used herein shall have the meaning assigned by Texas Transportation Code Chapter 706 or other relevant statute. Terms not defined in this Contract or by other relevant statutes shall be given their ordinary meanings. This Contract is entered into pursuant to Texas Government Code Chapter 791 and is subject to the laws and jurisdiction of the State of Texas and shall be construed and interpreted accordingly. The parties agree that this Contract is deemed performable in Travis County, Texas, and that venue for any suit arising from the interpretation or enforcement of this Contract shall lie in Travis County, Texas. This Contract applies to each FTA Report submitted to and accepted by the TDPS or the Vendor by the local political subdivision pursuant to the authority of Texas Transportation Code Chapter 706. Revised (12/11) 2 VII. Required Warning on Citation for Traffic Law Violations A peace officer authorized to issue citations within the jurisdiction of the local political subdivision shall issue a written warning to each person to whom the officer issues a citation for a traffic law violation. This warning shall be provided in addition to any other warnings required by law. The warning must state in substance that if the person fails to appear in court for the prosecution of the offense or if the person fails .to pay or satisfy a judgment ordering the payment of a fine and cost in the manner ordered by the court, the person may be denied renewal of the person's driver license. The written warning may be printed on the citation or on a separate instrument. If the person fails to appear or fails to pay or satisfy a judgment as required by law, the local political subdivision may submit an FTA Report containing the following information: (1) the jurisdiction in which the alleged offense occurred; (2) the name of the local political subdivision submitting the report; (3) the name, date of birth and Texas driver license number of the person who failed to appear or failed to pay or satisfy a judgment; (4) the date of the alleged violation; (5) a brief description of the alleged violation; (6) a statement that the person failed to appear or failed to pay or satisfy a judgment as required by law; (7) the date that the person failed to appear or failed to pay or satisfy a judgment; and (3) any other information required by the TDPS. There is no requirement that a criminal warrant be issued in response to the person's failure to appear. The local political subdivision must make reasonable efforts to ensure that all FTA Reports are accurate, complete and non -duplicative. IX. Clearance Reports The originating court that files the FTA Report has a continuing obligation to review the report and promptly submit appropriate additional information or reports to the Vendor or the TDPS. The clearance report shall identify the person, state whether or not a fee was required, advise the TDPS to lift the denial of renewal and state the grounds for the action. All clearance reports must be submitted immediately from the time and date that the originating court receives appropriate payment or other information that satisfies the citizen's obligation to that court. Revised (12/11) To the extent that a local political subdivision utilizes the FTA Program by submitting an FTA Report, there is a corresponding obligation to collect the statutorily required $30.00 administrative fee. If the person is acquitted of the underlying offense for which the original FTA Report was filed, the originating court shall not.require payment of the administrative fee. The local political subdivision shall submit a clearance report immediately advising the TDPS to lift the denial of renewal and identifying the grounds for the action. The local political subdivision must immediately file a clearance report upon payment of the administrative fee and: (1) the perfection of an appeal of the case for which the warrant of arrest was issued or judgment arose; (2) the dismissal of the charge for which the warrant of arrest was issued or judgment arose; (3) the posting of a bond or the giving of other security to reinstate the charge for which the warrant was issued; (4) the payment or discharge of the fine and cost owed on an outstanding judgment of the court; or (5) other suitable arrangement to pay the fine and cost within the court's discretion. The TDPS will not continue to deny renewal of the person's driver license after receiving notice from the local political subdivision that the FTA Report was submitted in error or has been destroyed in accordance with the local political subdivision's record retention policy, X. Compliance with Law The local political subdivision understands and agrees that it will comply with all local, state and federal laws in the performance of this Contract, including administrative rules adopted by the TDPS. An officer collecting fees pursuant to Texas Transportation Code §706.006 shall keep separate records of the funds and shall deposit the funds in the appropriate municipal or county treasury. The custodian of the municipal or county treasury may deposit such fees in an interest -bearing account and retain the interest earned thereon for the local political subdivision. The custodian shall keep accurate and complete records of funds received and disbursed in accordance with this Contract and the governing statutes. The custodian shall remit $20.00 of each fee collected pursuant to Texas Transportation Code §706.006 to the Comptroller on or before the last day of each Revised (12/11) 4 .calendar quarter and retain $10.00 of each fee for payment to the Vendor and credit to the general fund of the municipal or county treasury. The TDPS has contracted with OmniBase Services of Texas ("Vendor"), a corporation organized and incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas, with its principal place of business in Austin, Texas, to assist with the implementation of 'the FTA Program. Correspondence to the Vendor may be addressed as follows: OmniBase Services of Texas 7320 North Mo Pac Expressway, Suite 310 Austin, Texas 78731 (512) 346-6.511 ext. 100, (512) 346-9312 (fax) The local political subdivision must pay the Vendor a fee of $6.00 per person for each violation which has been reported to the Vendor and for which the local political subdivision has subsequently collected the statutorily required $30.00 administrative fee. In the event that the person has been acquitted of the underlying charge, no payment will be made to the Vendor or required of the local political subdivision. The parties agree that payment shall be made by the local political subdivision to the Vendor no later than the last day of the month following the close of the calendar quarter in which the payment was received by the local political subdivision. In the event that the local political subdivision is aware of litigation in which this Contract or Texas Transportation Code Chapter 706 is subject to constitutional, statutory, or common-law challenge, or is struck down by judicial decision, the local political subdivision shall make a good faith effort to notify the TDPS immediately. Each party may participate in the defense of a claim or suit affecting the FTA Program, but no costs or expenses shall be incurred for any party by the other party without written consent. To the extent authorized by law, the local political subdivision City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the TDPS against any claims, suits, actions, Revised (12/1 t) 5 damages and costs of every nature or description arising out of or resulting from the performance of this Contract, and the local political subdivision City further agrees to satisfy any final judgment awarded against the local political subdivision City or the TDPS arising from the performance of this Contract, provided said claim, suit, action, damage, judgment or related cost is not attributed by the judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to the sole negligence of the TDPS. It is the agreement of the parties that any litigation involving the parties to this Contract may not be compromised or settled without the express consent of the TDPS, unless such litigation does not name the TDPS as a party. This section is subject to the statutory rights and duties of the Attorney General for the State of Texas. XIV. Contract Modification No modifications, amendments or supplements to, or waivers of, any provision of this Contract shall be valid unless made in writing and executed in the same manner as this Contract. XV. Severability If any provision of this Contract is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the term hereof, such provision shall be fully severable. This Contract shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision had never comprised a part hereof, and the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by the illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision or by its severance therefrom. XVI. Multiple Counterparts This Contract may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes and all of which constitutes, collectively, one Contract. But, in making proof of this Contract, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. XVII. Effective Date of Contract This Contract shall be in effect from and after the date that the final signature is set forth below. This Contract shall automatically renew on a yearly basis. However, either party may terminate this Contract upon thirty days written notice to the other party. Notice may be given at the following addresses: Revised (12/11) 6 Local political subdivision Texas Department of Public Safety Attn: Enforcement and Compliance Service 5805 North Lamar Boulevard Austin, Texas 78773-0001 (512) 424-5311 [fax] Notice is effective upon receipt or three days after deposit in the U. S. mail, whichever occurs first. After termination, the local political subdivision has a continuing obligation to report dispositions and collect fees for all violators in the FTA System at the time of termination. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL POLITICAL SUBDIVISION* PUBLIC S-LFETY Sheri Gipson Deputy Administrator Date Authorized Signature Title Date *An additional page may be attached if more than one signature is required to execute this Contract on behalf of the local political subdivision. Each signature block must contain the person's title and date. Revised (12/11) 7 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: October 8, 2012 Requested By: David Mick Department: Public Works Report: Resolution: Ordinance Exhibits: HGAC Pricing Worksheet Ambulance Exhibits: HGAC Pricing Worksheet Bus Exhibits 2012-13 Vehicle Replacement List Budget Source of Funds: Motorpool 009 009-5059-522-8050 Account Number: 009-8082-551-8050 Amount Budgeted S 313,044.00 Amount Requested: $ 268,315.81 Budgeted Item: yes SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION Unit 59-27, an ambulance, is scheduled for complete replacement. A quote (AM04-10) was received from HGAC for a Type I Frazer Ambulance Module with a Dodge-4500 diesel - powered chassis through the cooperative purchasing program. The quote totals $180,725.00 including the administrative fee from HGAC of $1,000. Amount budgeted for this unit is $193,044.00. Unit 82-09, a special services bus, is scheduled for replacement. A quote (BT01-11) was received from HGAC for an Aero Elite 20 passenger bus with a Ford F550 gasoline -powered chassis through the cooperative purchasing program. The quote totals $87,590.81, including the administrative fee from HGAC of $600. Amount budgeted for this unit is $120,000.00. Both units were included in the 2012-13 budget that was approved by the Council on September 10, 2012. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action authorizing the purchase of a Type I Frazer Ambulance Module with a Dodge-4500 diesel -powered chassis and an Aero Elite bus with a Ford F-550 gasoline powered chassis through HGAC's cooperative purchasing program in the amount of $276,157.27 Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander City Manager Date CONTRACT PRICING WORKSHEET For MOTOR VEHICLES Only Contract No.: AM04-10 Date Prepared: 09/11/12 This Worksheet is prepared by Contractor and given to End User. If a PO is issued, both the PO and the Worksheet MUST be faxed to H-GAC @ 713-993-4548. Therefore please type or print legibly. Buying Agency: City of La Porte EMS Contractor: Dallas Dodge Quote #7600C-HGAC Contact Person: Jason Peugeot Prepared By: Tim Middlebrooks Phone: 281-471-9244 Phone: 214-319-1336 Fax: 281-471-0688 Fax: 214-319-1306 Email: peugeotj@laportetx.gov Email: tmiddiebrooks@kag-1.net Product Code:Descri Code: LA10 ption: Type I 14' on Dodge Ram 4500 Diesel DRW Cab/Chassis, Gen Pwrd Mod Product Item Base Unit Price Per Contractor's H-GAC Contract: $124,500.0 B. Published Options - Itemize below - Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary - Include Option Code in description if applicable. Note: Published Options are options which were submitted and priced in Contractor's bid.) Description Cost Description Cost 1-Heat shielding for diesel chassis $1,500.00 1199-(x6) Install miscellaneous equipment $3,000.0 9-Granning air suspension system for Dodge Ram 4500 $5,500.00 1140-Install a Voyager back up camera on the rear wall $400.0 77-Air Liquide electric 02 panel with monitor at the action w $1,275.00 1142-Install a Voyager camera in the patient compartment on th $400.0 1305-All products listed in the current Stryker "List Price Book $16,161.00 1147-Install a Voyager quad view monitor in the truck cab near $800.0 9-Buell dual 10" & 12" air horns through front bumper $800.00 16-Arm rests on the console $200.0 9-Mount a fast recovery compressor for the air horn system be $1,200.00 6-(2) large aluminum map holders on rear of console $350.0 1209-(xl4)Lighting modification from base (each) $7,000.00 28-3 receptacle 12VDC outlet, no medical diode isolator on pas $100.0 188-Squad bench cabinet w/ padding on end $600.00 42-2 high glove box holder on back wall of truck cab $125.0 68-Grey EVS captain's chair with built-in child safety seat $700.00 380-Install a Sharps container and bracket on the rear wall abov $75.0 185-Netting at the head of the squad bench $750.00 415-Install a 2 high glove box holder on the rear wall above the $125.0 1167-3M diamond grade conspicuity tape in Chevron pattern o $1,500.00 Subtotal From Additional Sheet(s): $16,825.0 1171-Double 8" 3M reflective stripe with non -reflective pinstril $2,700.00 Subtotal B: $62,086.0 C. Unpublished Options - Itemize below / attach additional sheet(s) if necessary. Note: Unpublished options are items which were not submitted and priced in Contractor's bid.) Description Cost Description Cost ear Sway Bar $700.00 ox MedVault $2,189.00 Subtotal From Additional Sheet(s): oftware package $250.00 11 Subtotal C: 313 ffal cost of Unpublished Options (C) cannot exceed 25% of the total of the Base Unit Price plus Published Options (A+B). For this transaction the percentage is: 2°/ Total Cost Before Any Applicable Trade -In / Other Allowances / Discounts (A+B+C) Quantity Ordered: 1� X Subtotal of A+ B + C: $189,725.00 = Subtotal D: $189,725.0 H-GAC Order Processing Charge (Amount Per Current Policy) IF Subtotal E: $1,000.0 F. Trade -Ins / Special Discounts / Other Allowances / Freight / Installation / Miscellaneous Charges Description Cost Description Cost Trade -In $'P4V,4VaJm.(m Subtotal F: -1000 Delivery Date: IF G. Total Purchase Price (D+E+F). $180,725.0 CONTRACT PRICING WORKSHEET For MOTOR VEHICLES Only Contract No.: AM04-10 Date Prepared: 09/11/12 This Worksheet is prepared by Contractor and given to End User. If a PO is issued, both the PO and the Worksheet MUST be faxed to H-GAC @ 713-993-4548. Therefore please type or print legibly. Buying Agency: City of La Porte EMS Contractor: Dallas Dodge Quote #7600C-HGAC Contact Person: Jason Peugeot Prepared By: Tim Middlebrooks Phone: 281-471-9244 Phone: 214-319-1336 Fax: 281-471-0688 Fax: 214-319-1306 Email: peugeotj@laportetx.gov Email: tmiddiebrooks@kag-1.net Product Code: Description: Product Item Base Unit Price Per Contractor's H-GAC Contract: B. Published Options - Itemize below - Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary - Include Option Code in description if applicable. Note: Published Options are options which were submitted and priced in Contractor's bid.) Description Cost Description Cost 33-2 high powder coated aluminum jumbo "D" cylinder hpldei $175.00 531-There is an electric lock actuator on the side main door $300.0 39-Install a (2) high "D" cylinder holder in the 02 compartmei $175.00 532-There is an electric lock actuator on the rear main door $300.0 37-Extra overhead grab rails on a 14' unit $275.00 541-There is an electric lock actuator on the 02 compartment d $300.0 199-22 pocket acrylic organizer above the squad bench $450.00 1210-(x4)Exterior compartment and/ or structure modification ( $2,000.0 65-175-4 dual position cot mount $100.00 1211-(x4)Inter compartment/ cabinet modification (each) $2,000.0 89-Mount an MDT swivel on the action wall countertop in fro $425.00 1191-Foam insulation in walls $1,500.0 8-(2)Furnish and install a Streamlight SL-20XP flashlight on t $400.00 27-Install a digital clock in the cushions above the rear doors v $375.00 40-Install an extra 02 outlet in the ceiling raceway above the r $350.00 44-This unit gets an Engel 34 qt. Refrigerator with a hasp abo $1,400.00 03-This unit gets a 3M Opticom Install a GPS antenna system $6,000.00 Subtotal From Additional Sheet(s): 33-There is an electric lock actuator on the front I/O door $300.00 Subtotal B: $16,825.0 C. Unpublished Options - Itemize below / attach additional sheet(s) if necessary. Note: Unpublished options are items which were not submitted and priced in Contractor's bid.) Description Cost Description Cost Subtotal From Additional Sheet(s): 11 Subtotal C: Check: Total cost of Unpublished Options (C) cannot exceed 25% of the total of the Base Unit Price plus Published Options (A+B). For this transaction the percentage is: 0°/ Total Cost Before Any Applicable Trade -In / Other Allowances / Discounts (A+B+C) Quantity Ordered: 1 1 X Subtotal of A + B + C: $16,825.00 = Subtotal D: $0.0 H-GAC Order Processing Charge (Amount Per Current Policy) Subtotal E: F. Trade -Ins / Special Discounts / Other Allowances / Freight / Installation / Miscellaneous Charges Description Cost Description Cost Subtotal F: Delivery Date: G. Total Purchase Price (DKF:F $0.0 A. Product Item Base Unit Price Per Contractor's H-GAC Contract: Total A. $67,840.00 D. Total Cost Before Any Applicable Trade -In 1 Other Allowances 1 Discounts A+B+C Subtotal of A + B + C: $86.110.00 X Quantity Ordered: 1 Subtotal D: $86,110.00 E. H-GAC Order Processing Charge (Amount Per Current Policy) Total �: $600.00 F. Trade -Ins / Other Allowances I Special Discounts/ Freight./ Installation -;Itemized. on attached additionalsheet.(0) Subtotal F From Additional Sheet(s): $880.81 G.`Total Purchase Price Total from (D+E+F): $87,5W81 Estimated. number of days until delivery. _ 180 - 210 Acceptance Date SIGNATURE Authorized Si nature T_ ELDORADO NATIONAL IDS Type IIIHD Transit Bus Aero Elite F550 320 - 20 Pass. w12 Wheelchair spaces STANDARD EQUIPMENT CHASSIS Ford F-550 Super Duty "Cab & Chassis", 19,500 GVWR, 201"wheelbase 6.8 liter, 3-valve V10 gasoline engine, 305 horsepower @ 4250 RPMs TorgShifC 5-speed Automatic Transmission wl overdrive & external cooler Heavy Duty OEM Alternator (225 amps) Stationary elevated idle control (SEIC)* Tilt steering column Steel belted radial tires (225I70Rx19.5) Dual batteries Four (4) wheel disc brakes w1ABS 40gallon fuel tank In dash a/c, heat, & defrost Black rubber flooring in cab area AERO ELITE BODY: 29"x 41" tinted T-slide passenger windows positioned at each row 30" manual entry door (29" clear width) Left hand entry hand rail in step well, stanchions & modesty panel White step safety nosing Color, number & function coded computer tested electrical wiring Interior central power panel Easy access driver control console, located for safety Trac-Lock, adjustable track seating Black RCA transit grade floor rubber wl ribbed aisle Contoured exterior mirrors wl convex lens in a resin injection -molded housing Interior courtesy lights Exterior D.O.T. clearance lights Durable fiberglass sidewall panels CRASH TESTED, impact resistant, non corrosive composite body Bright white exterior finish wl durable Gelcoated exterior finish 3l4" sealed & undercoated exterior grade plywood floor 40,000 lb. load bearing structural steel floor under structure AIR CONDITIONING: Rear Air Conditioning system rated at 90,000 BTU's with: • Dual compressors, chassis supplied plus an auxiliary dedicated to rear system • Three fan skirt mounted condenser unit rated at 78,000 BTU's12,775 CFM's • Rear evaporator, rated at 90,000 BTU's12,400 CFM's GENERAL & SAFETY FEATURES: Exterior entry door light Auxiliary high idle control Reverse alarm Right & left hand entry hand rail in step well Overhead handrail Driver's passenger view mirror First aid kit, fire extinguisher, & reflector kit SEATING: Freedman low back passenger seats with: • Commercial grade fabric or vinyl upholstery • Freedman high back reclining driver's seat wl armrests PARATRANSIT: ADA compliance features with: • Double outward opening wheelchair lift door • Fully automatic wheelchair lift • Transmission interlock • Interior and exterior lights in the lift area • Retractable (4) point wheelchair securement tie downs • Priority seating decals • Freedman flip seats over the wheelchair positions wlseatbelt EXTERIOR Bright white exterior wl durable gel coat finish Area around windows painted black INTERIOR LAYOUT: r6275� EGRESS SY1NDOiY EGRESS WINOOW ■ �r ..... ..... EGRESS WINDOW PRICING 777771 Base Contract Price Is $ 67,840.00 Base selling price is F.O.B. Salina, Kansas. MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHEDOPTIONS QTY DESCRIPTION i Heavy Duty Rear Door W/Upper Window 1 30" Electric Entry Door in lieu of Manual Door 1 Window Each Side of Rear Door I ACT 9333 Max 125,000 BTU a/c System i Passenger Overhead Storage Compartment 1 Driver's Storage Comparment - Over Windshield 20 Retractable Seat Belts wl Underseat Retractors i LED Exterior Light Package i Gray Transit Grade Floor Rubber wl Ribbed Aisle i Spare Tire Ship Loose f Modesty Panel, Drivers Option 1 Freedman Featherweight 34" Double Flip Seat 1 Freedman Forward Facing Double Foldaway Passenger Seat 1 Tie Down Belt Storage Box Total Cost of:Manufacturer's Published Options UNPUBLISHED OPTIONS DESCRIPTION Liquid Spring Suspension System Total Cost of Unpublished Optional; Equipment UNIT PRICE EXTENDED $540.00 540.00 $295.00 295.00 $180.00 180.00 $4,250.00 4,250.00 $1,200.00 1,200.00 $125.00 125.00 $48.00 960.00 $300.00 300.00 $250.00 250.00 $280.00 280.00 $50.00 50.00 $344.00 344.00 $565.00 565.00 $31.00 31.00 $ 9,370.00 UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 8,900.00 8,900.00 U,9UU.UU NON -EQUIPMENT CHARGES QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 1 Dealer Inventory Tax 142.81 142.81 1 Delivery from manufacturing plant 738.00 738.00 arges Total Cost of Non -equipment` Ch$ 880.81 CITY OF LA P ORTE SUMMARY OF VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 Account Numbei- Amount Unit DeseAption 009-5051-522-8050 $ 437,091 51-30 1992 KME Fire Truck 009-5059-522-8051 193,044 59-27 2008 Ford F450 Ambulance C&C w/module 009-5252-521-8050 31,859 52-08 2005 Ford Police Interceptor 009-5253-521-8050 31,859 53-27 2003 Ford Police Interceptor 009-5253-521-8050 31,859 53-40 2004 Ford Police Interceptor 009-5253-521-8051 31,859 53-49 2005 Ford Police Interceptor 009-5253-521-8050 31,859 53-50 2005 Ford Police Interceptor 009-5253-521-8051 31,859 53-56 2006 Ford Police Interceptor 009-6049-551-8050 29,577 49-14 2007 Jacobsen Riding Greens Mower 009-6049-551-8050 7,976 49-15 Electric Truckster 009-6049-551-8050 26,115 49-22 Jolm Deere Truckster 009-6049-551-8050 12,579 49-90 Ryan Aerator 009-7071-531-8050 2,751 71-48 2003 Busliliog type rotary mower 009-7071-531-8050 2,751 71-51 2003 Busliliog type rotary mower 009-7072-532-8050 88,118 72-11 200125 Cubic yard trash truck 009-7072-532-8050 88,118 72-12 200125 Cubic Yard Trash Truck 009-8082-551-8050 120,000 82-09 2002 26 Passenger Bus with handicap lift 009-7085-533-8050 50,000 85-10 2001 Kubota Trachoe with 24 inch bucket 009-7086-532-8050 40,000 86-12 2001 Kubota Trachoe w/18 Inch bucket 009-7086-532-8050 28,459 86-38 2006 FORD 3/4 Ton w/ utility body 009-9090-519-8050 37,402 90-02 2000 Ford Excursion S 1,355,135 6-8 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: October 8, 2012 Requested By: Tim Tietiens Department: Planning Report: _Resolution: X Ordinance: Exhibits: Resolution with proposed Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan Resolution No. 2010-26 with Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan Appropriation Source of Funds: N/A Account Number: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Amount Requested: N/A Budgeted Item: _YES _NO SUMMARY On November 8, 2010, City Council approved Resolution No. 2010-26 adopting a Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan for the Hurricane Ike Texas Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. This plan needs to be updated based on the new Texas General Land Office (GLO) requirements. Differences in the Section 3 Plan included with this proposed Resolution include changes to Provisions B and G. Provision B changed the assignment of duties related to implementation of the plan from the Equal Opportunity Rights Officer to the designated Section 3 Coordinator. Provision G now requires submission of monthly reports required by HUD or the GLO where they were required to HUD and the Texas Department of Rural Affairs (TDRA) as they occurred previously. The City's Grant Administrator remains responsible for submittal of the reports, which will now occur monthly. The Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan is a CDBG regulation designed to provide work opportunities for low -moderate income residents and businesses when possible. Continued program funding for Round 2.2 is contingent upon approval of this Resolution. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action of a Resolution adopting a Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan for the projects funded by the Texas Community Development Block Grant Program. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE ADOPTING A SECTION 3 LOCAL OPPORTUNITY PLAN FOR GRANT PROGRAMS. WHEREAS, the City shall strive to attain goals for compliance to Section 3 regulations by increasing opportunities for employment and by contracting with Section 3 residents and businesses within its jurisdictional boundaries in accordance with an adopted Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan. THEREFORE, the City Council hereby resolves to adopt a Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas, on the day of .2012. ATTEST: Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS Louis R. Rigby, Mayor Clark Askins, Assist/ant City Attorney SECTION 3 LOCAL OPPORTUNITY PLAN In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 1701u, (Section 3), the City of La Porte agrees to implement the following steps, which, to the greatest extent feasible, will provide job training, employment and contracting opportunities for Section 3 residents and Section 3 businesses of the areas in which the program/project is being carried out. A. Introduce and pass a resolution adopting this plan as a policy to strive to attain goals for compliance to Section 3 regulations by increasing opportunities for employment and contracting for Section 3 residents and businesses. B. Assign duties related to implementation of this plan to the designated Equal Rights Officer. C. Notify Section 3 residents and business concerns of potential new employment and contracting opportunities as they are triggered by TxCDBG grant awards through the use of: Public Hearings and related advertisements; public notices; bidding advertisements and bid documents; notification to local business organizations such as the Chamber(s) of Commerce or the Urban League; local advertising media including public signage; project area committees and citizen advisory boards; local HUD offices; regional planning agencies; and all other appropriate referral sources. Include Section 3 clauses in all covered solicitations and contracts. D. Maintain a list of those businesses that have identified themselves as Section 3 businesses for utilization in TxCDBG funded procurements, notify those businesses of pending contractual opportunities, and make this list available for general Grant Recipient procurement needs. E. Maintain a list of those persons who have identified themselves as Section 3 residents and contact those persons when hiring/training opportunities are available through either the Grant Recipient or contractors. F Require that all Prime contractors and subcontractors with contracts over $100,000 commit to this plan as part of their contract work. Monitor the contractors' performance with respect to meeting Section 3 requirements and require that they submit reports as may be required by HUD or TDRA to the Grant Recipient. G. Submit reports as required by HUD or TDRA regarding contracting with Section 3 businesses and/or employment as they occur; and submit reports within 20 days of calendar year end which identify and quantify Section 3 businesses and employees. H. Maintain records, including copies of correspondence, memoranda, etc., which document all actions taken to comply with Section 3 regulations. As officers and representatives of the City of La Porte, we the undersigned have read and fully agree to this plan, and become a party to the full implementation of this program. Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date RESOLUTION NO. G 01 U ! 2 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SECTION 3 LOCAL OPPORTUNITY PLAN FOR THE TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (TXCDBG) PROGRAM. WHEREAS, participation in the TXCDBG Program requires the City to strive to attain goals for compliance with Section 3 regulations by increasing opportunities for employment and by contracting with Section 3 residents and businesses within its jurisdictional boundaries in accordance with an adopted Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan. 4 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby resolves to adopt a Section 3 Local Opportunity Plan, attached hereto and incorporated herein. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 8'h day of November, 2010. CITY ATTEST: PORTE, TEXAS City Secretary Assistant City Attorney SECTION 3 LOCAL OPPORTUNITY PLAN In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 1701 u, (Section 3), the City of La Porte agrees to implement the following steps, which, to the greatest extent feasible, will provide job training, employment and contracting opportunities for Section 3 residents and Section 3 businesses of the areas in which the program/project is being carried out. A. Introduce and pass a resolution adopting this plan as a policy to strive to attain goals for compliance to Section 3 regulations by increasing opportunities for employment and contracting for Section 3 residents and businesses. B. Assign duties related to implementation of this plan to the designated Equal Rights Officer. C. Notify Section 3 residents and business concerns of potential new employment and contracting opportunities as they are triggered by TxCDBG grant awards through the use of: Public Hearings and related advertisements; public notices; bidding advertisements and bid documents; notification to local business organizations such as the Chamber(s) of Commerce or the Urban League; local advertising media including public signage; project area committees and citizen advisory boards; local HUD offices; regional planning agencies; and all other appropriate referral sources. Include Section 3 clauses in all covered solicitations and contracts. D. Maintain a list of those businesses that have identified themselves as Section 3 businesses for utilization in TxCDBG funded procurements, notify those businesses of pending contractual opportunities, and make this list available for general Grant Recipient procurement needs. E. Maintain a list of those persons who have identified themselves as Section 3 residents and contact those persons when hiring/training opportunities are available through either the Grant Recipient or contractors. F. Require that all Prime contractors and subcontractors with contracts over $100,000 commit to this plan as part of their contract work. Monitor the contractors' performance with respect to meeting Section 3 requirements and require that they submit reports as may be required by HUD or TDRA to the Grant Recipient. G. Submit reports as required by HUD or TDRA regarding contracting with Section 3 businesses and/or employment as they occur; and submit reports within 20 days of calendar year end which identify and quantify Section 3 businesses and employees. Andag ords, including copies of correspondence, memoranda, etc., which l actions aken to comply with Section 3 regulations. .. .. ese to i es of the City of La Porte, we the undersigned have read thi pl , and became a party to the full Implementation of this C Ron Bottoms, City'Manager Date REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: October 8, 2012 Requested By: Chief Adeox Department: Ia Poyta Po ic@ slant Report: X Resolution: Ordinance: Exhibits: Vendor Quotation Exhibits: Financing Budget Source of Funds: General Fund Account Number: 001-5253-521-4050 Amount Budgeted: $118,000 Amount Requested: $114,168 Budgeted Item: YES SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION As discussed and approved during the 2012/2013 City Council Budget Review, the Police Department will be transitioning away from using standard leased Dell lap -top computers in its marked patrol cars to Titan ruggedized computer terminals. As part of this transition, the Police Department will also be replacing all of its current in -car DVR Cameras with improved in -car DVR Camera Systems that are both WiFi capable and integrate directly into the new Titan computer terminals. The above described up -grade will present several benefits for the Police Department. First and foremost, the new integrated Coban in -car computer and DVR systems represent improved technology. The new Titan lap -tops are ruggedized, preventing the cracking of computer screens, "heat rated", preventing computers from over -heating and shutting down during the summer months, and fully WiFi capable, allowing for the automated wireless downloading of in -car video. Second, the Coban system will create much desired uniformity among the department's marked patrol vehicles as the existing systems were purchased incrementally over a number of years and, although the same make, are of several different models. This can be confusing when officers move from one patrol vehicle to another. Third, the transition will allow the Department to better plan for equipment needs and expenditures over the next five year period, since fixed equal payments will be due each fiscal year. Lastly, the Coban technologies agreement includes a full -service maintenance contract covering the life of the agreement, 5 years. These new computer and DVR systems are being financed for a five year period through the finance agent for Coban Technologies, Bevenco National Equipment Leasing and Finance, at a fixed annual cost of S114,168.00 The cost of maintaining the department's current aging system was estimated at just over $100,000 annually. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action authorizing the Police Department to proceed with procurement of Coban systems through HGAC. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date HGACBuyCONTRACT PRICING WORKSHEET For Catalog & Price Sheet Type Purchases Contract _ EF-04-11 No.: Date 9/27/2012 Prepared: This Worksheet is prepared by Contractor and given to End User. If a PO is issued, both documents MUST be faxed to H-GAC @ 713-993-4548. Therefore please type or print legibly. Buying :LaPorte Police Department Agency: Contractor: =COBAN Technologies, Inc a Contact Chief K. Adcox Person: Prepared _Larry Marr By: a Phone:-281-842-3101 Phone:-281-277-8288 X:131 Fax: Fax: Email: adcoxk@laportetx.gov Email: _larrym@cobantech.com Catalog / Price Sheet Name: B-01 General Description of Product: igital Video Recording Solution A. Catalog / Price Sheet Items being purchased - Itemize Below - Attach Additional Sheet If Necessary Quan Description Unit Pr Total 6 Edge 5.7 4850s 29100 38 Edge VMDC t°%+i/����� 9500' 361000 -Laptop/MDC integration 6 1200 44 Dual Microphone Receiver %%/ / ' // %l% 150 6600 p /Gi/� ia� t 44 _Detached Wide Ang1F ;/ /� ��a{per�„ ; „ e� ,,,, , , ,m„ , � y ,,: � y � � � � r r� �, , = 250 _ 11000 44 Wireless 802.11 a/g/n Antenna _ 185 s 8140 15 -Edge Wireless transmitter kit 335 s 5025 44 GPS 250"s 11000 1 -Tech support kit 195 s 195 6 Edge Standard Mounting 0 0 1 removable hard drive multi upload cradle 950s 950 0 Total From Other Sheets, If Any: Subtotal A: 434210 B. Unpublished Options, Accessory or Service items - Itemize Below - Attach Additional Sheet If Necessary (Note: Unpublished Items are any which were not submitted and priced in contractor's bid.) Quan Description Unit Pr Total 38 :Edge VMDC Mounting 225s 8550 27 =Gamber Johnson mounts and installation 845 € 22815 4 -access point and controller configuration and testing 500s 2000 0 Total From Other Sheets, If Any: Subtotal B: 33365 Check: Total cost of Unpublished Options (B) cannot exceed 25% of the total of For this transaction the percentage is: 8% the Base Unit Price plus Published Options A+B . IL I C. Trade -Ins / Special Discounts / Other Allowances / Freight / Installation / Miscellaneous Charges Subtotal C: 01 Delivery Date: = 60 days ARO D. Total Purchase Price (A+B+Q- 467575 HGACBuyCONTRACT PRICING WORKSHEET For Catalog & Price Sheet Type Purchases Contract _ EF-04-11 No.: Date 9/27/2012 Prepared: This Worksheet is prepared by Contractor and given to End User. If a PO is issued, both documents MUST be faxed to H-GAC @ 713-993-4548. Therefore please type or print legibly. Buying :LaPorte Police Department Agency: Contractor: =COBAN Technologies, Inc a Contact Chief K. Adcox Person: Prepared _Larry Marr By: a Phone:-281-842-3101 Phone:-281-277-8288 X:131 Fax: Fax: Email: adcoxk@laportetx.gov Email: _larrym@cobantech.com Catalog / Price Sheet Name: B-01 General Description of Product: igital Video Recording Solution A. Catalog / Price Sheet Items being purchased - Itemize Below - Attach Additional Sheet If Necessary Quan Description Unit Pr Total 1 Wireless Site Survey 2500s 2500 1 16TB Server 13567.06 13567.06 71 1 ;workstation instalaltiona nd configuration %'' 'i%" ji/'/` i j //1i , g �, /L 250- 250 1 Server with Internal laid instalaltiona nd configuration %/" „/' ; ' '%/, 1 % 2500 2500 /i„ / f��/, 3 ;Wireless client confi - rupn , , f„ ,,,, F J t %% _ 50_ 150 37 :Edge In car installation _ 500s 18500 1 -In car installation training 2000- 2000 1 Admin/Offrcer training 2500s 2500 6 -Edge 4th year extended warranty 250s 1500 6 -Edge 5th year extended warranty 445 s 2670 0 0 Total From Other Sheets, If Any: 467575 Subtotal A: 513712.06 B. Unpublished Options, Accessory or Service items - Itemize Below - Attach Additional Sheet If Necessary (Note: Unpublished Items are any which were not submitted and priced in contractor's bid.) Quan Description Unit Pr Total 3 :Cisco 1262 802.11N Wireless Access Points 1710 5130 3 =Nema Enclosures 575 € 1725 1 -Cisco 2504 controller up to 15 AP's 4875 s 4875 4 Access point installations 1000s 4000 Total From Other Sheets, If Any: Subtotal B:1115730 Check: Total cost of Unpublished Options (B) cannot exceed 25% of the total of For this transaction the percentage is: 3% the Base Unit Price plus Published Options A+B . IL I C. Trade -Ins / Special Discounts / Other Allowances / Freight / Installation / Miscellaneous Charges Shipping 937.95 Subtotal C: 937.95 Delivery Date: = 60 days ARO D. Total Purchase Price (A+B+Q- 530380.01 HGACBuyCONTRACT PRICING WORKSHEET For Catalog & Price Sheet Type Purchases Contract _ EF-04-11 No.: Date 9/27/2012 Prepared: This Worksheet is prepared by Contractor and given to End User. If a PO is issued, both documents MUST be faxed to H-GAC @ 713-993-4548. Therefore please type or print legibly. Buying -LaPorte Police Department Agency: Contractor: =COBAN Technologies, Inc a Contact _Chief K. Adcox Person: Prepared _LarryMarr By: a Phone:-281-842-3101 Phone:-281-277-8288 X:131 Fax: Fax: Email: adcoxk@laportetx.gov Email: _larrym@cobantech.com Catalog / Price Sheet Name: B-01 General Description of Product: igital Video Recording Solution A. Catalog / Price Sheet Items being purchased - Itemize Below - Attach Additional Sheet If Necessary Quan Description Unit Pr Total 44 DVMS Maint/Support Year 1 250s 11000 44 =DVMS Maint/Support Year 2 �+�/����� 250€ 11000 44 =DVMS Maint/Supp6rt Year 3 !i/'/` i j ,1i 250 11000 l,. , ! ,, ., %..Dili„i, - %/''%iirrj/ir/,/ il,% 0 Ek _ 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total From Other Sheets, If Any: 530380.01 Subtotal A: 563380.01 B. Unpublished Options, Accessory or Service items - Itemize Below - Attach Additional Sheet If Necessary (Note: Unpublished Items are any which were not submitted and priced in contractor's bid.) Quan Description Unit Pr Total 44 :DVMS Maint/Support Year 4 250s 11000 44 =DVMS Maint/Support Year 5 250s 11000 38 Edge VMDC 4th year extended warranty 595 - 22610 38 Edge VMDC 5th year extended warranty 695 - 26410 Total From Other Sheets, If Any: Subtotal 13:11 71020 Check: Total cost of Unpublished Options (B) cannot exceed 25% of the total of For this transaction the percentage is: 13% the Base Unit Price plus Published Options A+B . IL I C. Trade -Ins / Special Discounts / Other Allowances / Freight / Installation / Miscellaneous Charges Discount -110559.01 Subtotal C: -110559.01 Delivery Date:; 60 days ARO D. Total Purchase Price (A+B+Q- 523841 T-, ] -f3 2L172-L]'.]--28 16.3S.53 (GMT) fiv— -�cd n—k Be N'u en c 0 AitMIJ £4udl meant l .�4ing & Niraiwt' 13312 Bright Sky Overlook Austin, Tx 78732 v: 512-266-4999 900-693-7106 f 512-266-4956 500-256-614S PAYMENT OPTION DATE: 9128f2012 PREPARED BY: Doug Beck ex-t 220 CUSTOMER: La Porte, '1:� PD VENDOR: Cock -in Teclviologics, Inc HQUIPMF_,NT: 38 Titati M7v & 6 Edge Systenis CONTRACT: Municipal Lease Purchase Agreement (finance) Amount Months ! a,2yment S'523, 8'41 60 9,514 3.55° o Customer oNvtis product and is obligated to term of paynients No blanket Iiett, loan covenants or additional collateral required Payments are fixed for the term with one in ach,ance No loan points or origination fees required TR7U11S,4RF SUBJF,CT TO-4AlAPPROI7HL, REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: October 8, 2012 Requested By: Jeff Suggs Department: Administration/IT Report: Resolution: Ordinance: Exhibits: AT&T Agreement Exhibits: DIR Contract No. DIR-SDD-646 Exhibits: Budget Source of Funds: IT Budget 00160665195007 Account Number: 01598926431100 $110,000.00 (Subscription) Amount Budgeted: $60,000.00 (Hardware) Amount Requested: $279,946.32 (Initial $60,000 hardware fee and 2-year subscription) Budgeted Item: YES X NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The City's IT Division would like to implement a virtual desktop program for at least seventy five (75) desktop computers throughout the City. A virtual desktop means that a user's desktop environment is stored remotely on a server, rather than on a local PC or other computing device. This provides employees with full access to their complete City desktop from multiple devices, such as employee's home PC, smart phone or iPad. Easy access to a virtualized desktop can enhance productivity because all that employees will need to work is an Internet connection from any device, anywhere. The City proposes entering into an agreement with AT&T for Virtual Desktop Integration (VDI) Services utilizing a State of Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) Contract (4DIR-SDD-646). Purchasing items through DIR contracts enables the DIR to leverage the purchasing power of all agencies when negotiating contracts with the vendor community. Utilizing DIR contracts can provide for reduced information technology costs, decreased administrative costs, and common IT procurement processes. The term of this agreement will be for two (2) years. There is an initial hardware fee of $60,000.00 and the annual cost for the subscription is $109,968. DESCRIPTION 'CHARGES, Initial Hardware: $60,000.00 Hardware Total $60,000.00 Monthly Recurring Fees: VDI (Monthly) $9,164.43 24 Month Total $219,946.32 Total VDI Price: $279,946.32 Staff recommends approval of the agreement with AT&T (See attached agreement). DIR Contract 9DIR- SDD-646 is also attached for Council's review. Project Benefits, Liabilities, and Operating Costs: The goal of this project is to reduce the amount of hardware maintained by the City, reduce energy costs, provide better service by making the user desktop available to staff in the field and reduce the overall cost of maintaining the computer fleet. As with many other programs, the IT Division's goal is to move as many applications to a cloud -based internet environment as possible. Should this project not be approved, the City would continue to lease computers. Moving to the VDI reduces the amount of downtime that currently takes place when a computer fails. Currently, downtime for leased computers can impact the response time and workload of the IT Division. VDI services also provide greater redundancy for disaster operations. As long as there is an internet connection, employees can log into the virtual desktop and not have to rely on a specific computer that may have been damaged. As with most technology, there is an initial cost to implement services. Initially, there is a slight increase over traditional processes that are currently in place. If the choice is made to continue expanding VDI services in the future, there will be a continued increase to the current operating budget. The IT Division feels the benefits to this system, as mentioned above, will outweigh this increase in costs. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action of an agreement with AT&T for Virtual Desktop Integration (VDI) services utilizing DIR Contract 9DIR-SDD-646. Approved for City Council Aeenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement D I R-S DS-646 135688UA AT&T Network Integration Tracking ID: 161411.1 Document Version Date #:09/25/12ver5.0 VDI Citv of La Porte I AT&T I Name: Todd Winkle Street Address: 604 W Fairmont Pkwy City: LaPorte State / Province: TX Country: USA Domestic / Intl / Zip Code: 77571- 6215 Name: Jeff Suggs Title: IT Director Telephone: 2814715020 Fax: Email: suggsi(a)laportetx.gov [Name]City of La Porte [Address] 604 W Fairmont Pkwy [City, State, Postal Code] LaPorte, TX 775716215 [Country] USA Attention: [Name, Title] Jeff Suggs, IT Director Street Address: City of La Porte City: LaPorte State / Province: TX Country: USA Domestic / Intl / Zip Code: 775716215 One AT&T Way Bedminster NJ 07921-0752 Contact: Master Agreement Support Team Email : mast(a7att.com Name: Title: Telephone: Street Address: City: State / Province: Country: Domestic / Intl / Zip Code: AT&T Corp One AT&T Way Bedminster, NJ 07921-0752 U.S.A. Attention: General Attorney Address: 3854 American Way City: Baton Rouge State / Province: LA Country: USA Domestic / Intl / Zip Code: 70816 Fax: Email: todd.winkle&att.com Sales/Branch Mgr: John Hagan SCVP Name: Christopher Roy Name: Jaymee Jusko Address: 1472 Edinger Avenue City: Tustin State / Province: CA Country: USA Domestic / Intl / Zip Code: 92780 Telephone: 714 -24 7-0 86 8 Email: iavmee.iusko(a7att.com This Agreement for AT&T Network Integration Services (hereinafter, "Agreement') is effective on the later of the dates when signed by both the Customer and AT&T (the "Effective Date"). AGREED: CUSTOMER: City of La Porte By: (Authorized Agent or Representative) (Typed or Printed Name) (Title) (Date) ATTUID: jj1767 AGREED: AT&T By: (Authorized Agent or Representative) (Typed or Printed Name) (Title) (Date) AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 1 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement Appendix C to DIR Contract No. DIR-SDD-646 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. MS-004-2012 THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT NO.: MS-004-2012 (the "Service Agreement") is made and entered into this _25th_day of Se tember between City of La Porte ("Customer"), and AT&T ("Vendor" or "AT&T"). This Service Agreement is entered into between Customer and AT&T pursuant to the DIR Contract No. DIR-SDD- 646 ("Contract"). Customer and AT&T agree that: (i) except to the extent expressly provided otherwise in this Service Agreement, all the terms and definitions of the Contract are incorporated by reference into this Service Agreement, (ii) the schedules and exhibits attached hereto are incorporated by this reference, and (iii) in the event of any inconsistent or contradictory terms between the Contract and the Service Agreement, the terms of the Contract shall control. This Service Agreement is effective on the date of last execution ("Effective Date"). Customer and Vendor hereby agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS All defined terms that are used in the Contract will have the same meaning in this Service Agreement. In addition, for purposes of this Service Agreement, the following terms shall have the indicated meanings: "Service Commencement Date" means the date AT&T and Customer agree specified contracted Services are operational and AT&T begins to take the first help desk calls for Services pursuant to the Operations Plan Outline. 2. TERM The term for Service provided under this Service Agreement (the "Term") shall begin as of the Service Commencement Date and shall continue until 24 months, unless earlier terminated or renewed in accordance with the provisions of this Service Agreement or Section 8.13. of the Contract. 3. TERMINATION 3.1 TERMINATION. Customer may terminate this Service Agreement in accordance with Section 8.13 of the Contract and this Section 3. 3.2 CONVENIENCE TERMINATION FEE. If Customer terminates this Service Agreement for convenience in accordance with Section 8.13.3 of the Contract, the following termination charges shall apply: [Termination fee formula will be referenced as agreed upon in the DIR contract.] 4. SERVICE ELEMENTS AT&T will provide City of La Porte with a VDI services environment. 5. PRICING 5.1 Customer will be invoiced for Virtual Desktop Integration Services at $9,164.43 per month for 24 months. 5.2 INVOICES FOR CHARGES AND EXPENSES. Invoice submission and payment shall be in accordance with the Contract. 6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS See Scope of Work 7. CUSTOMER SITES 604 W. Fairmont Pkwy, La Porte, TX 77571 8. TRANSITION PLAN See Scope of Work 9. CUSTOMER HISTORICAL SERVICE BASELINE AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 2 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate umnon��wk� at&l 10. AFFECTED EMPLOYEES City of La Porte employees. 11. THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement 12. PURCHASED EQUIPMENT If Customer must purchase equipment, the equipment must be purchased from a DIR contract as required by statute or Customer must receive an exemption approval. 13. OPERATIONS PLAN OUTLINE See Scope of Work 14. OTHER N/A IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have executed this Service Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CUSTOMER By: Name: Title:: Date: By: Name: Title: Date: AT&T AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 3 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement EXHIBIT 1: STATEMENT OF WORK 1. Introduction This Statement of Work ("SOW") is attached to the NI Pricing Schedule and made a part thereof upon execution. The Parties to this Statement of Work ("SOW") are AT&T Corp. ("AT&T) and City of La Porte ("Customer"). Services not specifically provided for hereunder are outside the scope of this SOW. Change Control will be processed by the Parties pursuant to procedures detailed herein. AT&T reserves the right to withdraw this SOW or modify the prices and any other terms and conditions, including, but not limited to, any section of this SOW (i) if the SOW is not signed by Customer and AT&T by October 31, 2012, and/or (ii) the engagement does not commence within thirty (30) calendar days of the Effective Date. 1.1 Definitions: • "Supplier": AT&T Corporation • "Services" means hosted servers as operated by AT&T • "Deliverables" means functional tasks performed by AT&T and Customer for each Service • "HYPERSTACK" means the Supplier's Virtualized Server Hosting Services solution. Responsibilities listed under each HYPERSTACK "BLOCK" will be provided by Supplier • "CORE" means the fundamental build of the host platform, including physical, network, and application layers • "BLOCK" Means specific hosting packages with variable feature sets • "Server" means an individual VM supporting a Customer or Supplier provided application • "Provisioning Date" is defined as the date on which the service is enabled by AT&T for Customer use • "Billing Start Date" is defined as fourteen (14) calendar days after the Provisioning Date. Billing of the service begins on the Billing Start Date. • "Policy & Procedures Manual" means the final operations document created for each Customer to identify specific operating procedures, processes, roles and responsibilities and escalation procedures • "SPOU means the Customer or supplier Single Point of Contact • "TAU means the Supplier's Technical Assistance Center • "MACD" means any Customer Moves, Adds, Changes and Deletes • "MRC" means the Customer's billed monthly recurring charges • "NRC" means the Customer's billed non recurring charges • "Non Managed" means the VM's and applications are not monitored or managed. Circuits and Core Network infrastructure is managed. • "VDI" means Virtual Desktop Integration • "VCC" means Virtual Client Computing Scope of Work 2.1 Services AT&T will provide City of La Porte with Virtual Desktop Integration Services ("VDI", "the Project"). AT&T services will be performed at Customer's location, 604 W. Fairmont Pkwy, La Porte, TX 77571. 2.2 Project Timeline Dates: 2.2.1 VDI Start Date: Estimated October 2012 End Date: Twenty-four (24) calendar months after Effective Date of VDI project start date AT&T Responsibilities, Tasks and Deliverables AT&T will be responsible for executing the following activities. Activities not expressly included in this SOW are outside the scope. 3.1 Material/Equipment provided by Supplier • Network Routers (Core, Distribution, Service) • Fabric/UCS Infrastructure • Firewalls • Servers/UCS • Storage/SAN • Virtualization Infrastructure Licensing 3.2 Project Management. In support of the Services provided to Customer, Supplier shall provide: Project and service delivery managers oversee the entire Customer opportunity from start to finish, and work with Customer's staff to custom plan, integrate, implement and support the virtual transition. • Transition meetings with Customer AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 4 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement • Support Processes and Procedure development • Support Scoping and Change Management • Project or Transition plan showing timelines, contacts and technicians to be used in electronic format. • Milestones and Objectives • Final Transition Testing and Acceptance 3.3 Staging — Infrastructure Configuration • See above • Detailed Migration Plan delivered with signed agreement and after initial planning and discovery meetings 3.4 Installation and Configuration • See above • Detailed Migration Plan delivered with signed agreement and after initial planning and discovery meetings 3.5 Test and Turn -up • Supplier will test connectivity to end Customer network • Supplier will confirm client side visibility to the host • Provide Cooperative External Testing of Each Application with Customer 3.6 Training — n/a 4.0 Change Control Process In the event either Party requests a change, it will submit the requested change in writing to the other Party, substantially in the form of Appendix B to this SOW. The receiving Party shall issue a written response within five (5) business days of the receipt of the request, indicating whether the receiving Party accepts or rejects the change(s). 5.0 Acceptance/Approval • Acceptance shall be met when the VDI Servers are tested during the Pre -Steady State period, and the connectivity from the Customer's site to the host has been tested and confirmed. Acceptance will not be delayed for any reason including Customer's schedule to load VMDX files, applications, or any additional Customer side testing. • This agreement does not include any `trial' periods. • In the event the Customer does not accept the services, the Customer will notify supplier in writing of all deviations from the requirements and specifications in Supplier's performance, including any deviations identified by Customer. • Supplier shall resolve the deviations(s) promptly within a time period specified by the Customer. Once all deviations have been resolved to the Customer's reasonable satisfaction, the agreement will be executed. 5.1 Contacts: To Be Determined 6.0 Virtual Private Cloud — Project estimated to begin October 2012 timeframe Full VPC Set Up Support— Dedicated Private -Stack Solution a. Design and On Domain Deployment b. Network Connectivity and VPN Turn Up c. Custom Configuration and Support of VM, UCS, and SAN d. Migration Planning e. Host VM Build f. Knowledge Transfer g. Pre -Steady State Monitoring h. Pre -Steady State Changes i. Steady State Support Customized & Flexible Architecture a. Dedicated USC Blade b. Dedicated SAN Storage c. Hypervisor Licensing d. Change Management e. Live Image Migration f. Local Nightly Back Ups Administrative Access and Control Administrative Knowledge Transfer 7x24x365 Eco System Managed Services AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 5 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement a. Blade Performance Monitoring b. VM Performance Management c. NetFlow Management d. Security / IDS Management e. Storage Monitoring and Management f. Automated Patch Management g. Automated Asset Management h. Anti Virus 7x24 T1-T3 VPC Help Desk Support a. hVPC Management b. Hypervisor Support c. As part of the Help Desk Services, SUPPLIER shall i. Serve as a SPOC for the authorized users to contact the Help Desk; ii. Receive, track, manage, escalate, and resolve problems and service Requests in accordance with the technologies supported as defined in the Policy & Procedures Manual. iii. Provide a Help Desk Service tracking system iv. Perform Level 1 support, as identified for the Authorized Users; v. Coordinate Level 2 support and Level 3 support, which may include coordinating and cooperating with Customer, Customer third party contractors or managed third parties, while retaining responsibility for tracking the problem through resolution or tracking the service request in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual; Level 1 support, Level 2 support, and Level 3 support have the following meanings. vi. Perform Authorized User account management functions, as defined in the Policies and Procedures Manual appropriate; vii. Provide event management reporting 7x24x365 Host and VM Managed Services a. Overview: The I -SITE Network Management System (NMS) LAN/WAN Network Services are based on `Life Cycle Solutioning' for the Host environment. The I -SITE NMS Managed Services Portfolio includes 7x24x365 Management of host core routers, switches firewalls, servers and load balancers, as well as Customer VM's and supported applications. The program implements proven remote tools, automated routines, documented processes and skilled technical resources. b. Major Functions: Without limiting the intended scope of the managed service, listed below is a description of the functions and key tasks AT&T will provide as part of the management responsibilities. Further details around each of these functions and key tasks are described in the Responsibility Matrix of this Schedule. c. As part of the support, AT&T shall Provide: i. Provide Transition support to the client including: 1. Dedicated/Shared Team Assignments 2. SPOC & Escalation Review 3. VPN or Circuit Connectivity Set UP ii. 7x24x365 Management 1. Monitoring of Core Host LAN/WAN Network CPE 2. Monitoring of Customer VM Environment on Host 3. 7x24x365 Management and Fault Remediation 4. T1-3 Technical Support 5. Configuration Management 6. OS and Patch Management 7. Incident Management and Problem Management 8. Change Management 9. End -User and System Access Administration Support — TAC 10. Service Level Management 11. Patch Release Management 12. System Back-up and Restore. 13. Event Logging 14. Performance & Capacity Management 15. Reporting Fault Restoration 16. SLA Management 17. Asset Tracking & Management 8. Tier 1-Tier 3 Support AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 6 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement SHMS provides T1-T3 Help Desk and TAC support for clients requiring assistance in supporting users in the hosted mail environment. Customers can choose to support their users at the T1 level, and escalate all T2 and T3 calls to SHMS TAC, or elect to have comprehensive support for all users questions and concerns. Overview of Services AT&T shall be responsible for receiving, tracking, managing, escalating and resolving designated Problems and Service Requests from the Customer and each Authorized User. In addition, AT&T shall be responsible for escalating and resolving those Problems and Service Requests arising from or relating to any of the Services. AT&T shall implement and maintain processes and procedures that are Customer satisfaction focused and designed to minimize redundant contacts by Authorized User(s). Such processes and procedures shall be described in the Policy & Procedures Manual and include designating individual AT&T Personnel as a single point of contact (each a "SPOC") that has end -to -end responsibility for each Problem and Service Request and shall work with designated Customer personnel. Major Functions Without limiting the intended scope of the Help Desk Services, listed below is a description of the functions and key tasks AT&T will provide as part of the Help Desk Services. Further details around each of these functions and key tasks are described in the Responsibility Matrix of this Schedule. As part of the Help Desk Services, AT&T shall: • Serve as a SPOC for the Authorized Users to contact the Help Desk; • Receive, track, manage, escalate, and Resolve Problems and Service Requests in accordance with the technologies supported, Policy & Procedures Manual and the Service Levels. "Resolve" means solving a Problem to each Authorized User's satisfaction and closing the applicable Problem ticket or Service Request. • Provide a Help Desk Service tracking System that satisfies AT&T Help Desk Service and Problem Management related obligations under the Agreement. Such Help Desk Service tracking System shall include asset information for each Authorized User as made available, and such other information as required by the Policies and Procedures Manual; • Provide Internet access to AT&T System Task Enterprise System or developed self-help System approved by Customer; • Perform Level 1 Support for the Authorized Users; • Coordinate Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support, which may include coordinating and cooperating with Customer, Customer Third Party Contractors or Managed Third Parties, while retaining responsibility for tracking the Problem through Resolution or tracking the Service Request in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual; Level 1 Support, Level 2 Support, and Level 3 Support have the following meanings. "Level 1 Support" means support that is provided as the entry point for inquiries or problem reports from Authorized Users. If Level 1 Support cannot resolve the inquiry or problem, the inquiry or problem is directed to the appropriate Level 2 Support or third party for resolution. "Level 2 Support" means support that serves as a consolidation point for inquiries and problems between Level 1 and Level 3. For example, Level 2 support might exist in a computer operations or a distribution/mail out center. If Level 2 Support cannot resolve the inquiry or problem, the inquiry or problem is directed to the appropriate Level 3 Support or third party for resolution. Inquiries or problems to this level are usually referred by Level 1 Support personnel, but may be initiated directly by Authorized Users or AT&T, as approved by AT&T. "Level 3 Support" means support provided by the personnel or third party that is most knowledgeable and experienced about the underlying problem or question and is utilized when efforts to resolve the problem or question by Level 1 and Level 2 Support have failed or are bypassed. Inquiries or problems are usually reported to Level 3 Support by Level 1 or Level 2 Support personnel, but may be initiated directly by Authorized Users or AT&T, as approved by AT&T. • Provide trending analysis of Help Desk calls, which may include analysis based on the following type of data: Service Requests, Problems, Severity Levels, Customer business unit, Eligible Recipient, and Customer Site, as applicable; • Provide Help Desk Systems, infrastructure, and processes, including business continuity to ensure continuous Help Desk Service; • Perform Authorized User Account Management functions, as defined in the Policies and Procedures Manual appropriate; • Provide event management reporting; and • Support remote access connectivity for remote computers accessing the Customer network. AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 7 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement Help Desk Services Process Requirements As part of the Help Desk Services, AT&T shall comply with the following in its performance of the Help Desk Services. a. AT&T will implement and maintain a Help Desk for Customer that will support extended coverage (i.e., 24x7x365), in English. b. AT&T will maintain a toll -free number for Help Desk Services such that callers within the United States and Canada shall not incur long distance charges to reach the Help Desk; c. AT&T shall provide and use the appropriate resources, documentation, reports, procedures, Systems and tools and management methodologies to administer, comprehensively manage and reliably support the provision of the Help Desk Services in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual; d. AT&T will provide Level 1 Support for the Authorized Users; e. AT&T will provide authorized Customer personnel with the ability to search historical and current Service Requests and resolutions of Problems and associated scripts and questions under SYSTEMTASK Enterprise, AT&T Problem and Service Requests Tracking System and Common Knowledge Management; f. AT&T will provide Customer Authorized Users with the ability to search historical and current Service Requests and perform self help enabled by SYSTEMTASK Enterprise system; g. AT&T will provide status updates with respect to Problems and Service Requests to the Authorized Users who call the Help Desk or via self-help tools; h. AT&T will follow the procedures set forth in the Policy & Procedures Manual with respect to adjusting Severity Levels and resolving and/or escalating Problems; i. AT&T will perform a Root Cause Analysis and implement a corrective action process to accelerate Resolution of repetitive Problems of a similar nature and eliminate the root cause of such Problems; j. AT&T will work to reduce the overall Resolution time for Problems; k. AT&T will provide network connectivity as necessary for Help Desk Services and shall maintain such connectivity without performance degradation; I. AT&T shall provide Authorized Users basic how-to training through the Help Desk Services in the operation of the hardware and client software; m. AT&T will handle very important personnel (e.g., Customer executives) (each a "VIP") calls to the Help Desk in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual; n. Customer will provide reply and remediation scripts as available, or work with AT&T to develop and approve such scripts to better remediate issues in a timely fashion. o. In addition to meeting the Service Levels, AT&T will establish and maintain, with Customer's agreement, a set of service targets for performing administrative support services (for example, resetting of passwords, calling card activation/deactivation) and report upon the services being realized, on a monthly basis. Responsibility Matrix The Help Desk Services include the functions, responsibilities, activities, tasks and projects allocated to AT&T and described below in the Responsibility Matrix. Customer will perform the responsibilities allocated to Customer in the Responsibility Matrix. Hel'p.Desk Services AT&T, 6storner -, Single Point of Contact Provide and maintain forthe Authorized Users a U.S. and Canada accessible toll -free telephone number, VRU, email X address, and Internet site uniform resource locator ("URL") for contacting the Help Desk; such toll -free telephone number shall be the same as number existing prior to the Effective Date. 2. Provide VIP special Help Desk access options in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 3. Publish the toll -free telephone number, URL, and email address for the Authorized Users to contact the Help Desk at each X Customer Site. 4. Manage first contact with the Authorized Users via telephone and the Internet. X 5. Inform the Authorized User (and the Customer Contract Manager) if implementing the Service Request would result in X additional Charges or other costs for which Customer is responsible; obtain approvals from the Customer Contract Manager (or his or her designee) for any such Service Requests that result in additional Charges or costs for which Customer is responsible. 6. Approve or reject any Service Request that would result in additional Charges or other costs for which Customer is X responsible. 7. Interact consistently with the Authorized Users in a professional, efficient and service -oriented manner. X Help Desk Servlre tr4'ckingSystcm. AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 8 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement Hel'p.Desk Services AT&T, 6stainOr -, 8. Process Problems and Service Requests using procedures set forth in the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 9. Provide AT&T with relevant information to enable access to the AT&T Help Desk Service tracking System by the Authorized Users. X 10. Provide Authorized Users access to SYSTEMTASK the Help Desk Service tracking System. X 11 Provide training sessions (e.g., train the trainer) on how Authorized Users may use SYSTEMTASK the AT&T Help Desk Services tracking System. X 12. Document, publish and maintain Help Desk Services policies and procedures. X 13. Approve Help Desk Services policies and procedures proposed by AT&T. X 14. Provide a SPOC for all Problem and Service Requests in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 15. Encourage the Authorized Users to contact the Help Desk with all Problems and Service Requests relating to the Services. X 16. Create tracking codes for Problems and Service Requests. X 17. Provide input on such tracking codes (e.g., input that enables AT&T to capture specific types of calls requested by Eligible Recipients). X 18. Provide a Help Desk Service tracking System to expedite management of Help Desk Service inquiries, Problems, and Service Requests. X 19. Review knowledge base systems data derived prior to the Commencement Date during Customer's operations of its help desk and incorporate such knowledge into the Help Desk Services. X 20. Provide existing scripts and other content (e.g., data and reports) to AT&T knowledge base Systems for use by AT&T in performing the Services. X 21. Conduct Scheduled Call Volume and Remediation Lessons Learned to groom processes and procedures for more efficient remediation X X 22. Build and Maintain Self Help Information X X Level 15upport (quthortzed UsOr) - 23. Authenticate Authorized User identity in accordance with defined security policies and procedures, including those policies and procedures set forth in the Policies and Procedures Manual. X 24. Provide SPOC for all Help Desk Services. X 25. Enter and maintain full detail of calls in the Help Desk Service tracking System, including full detail of Problem, Service Request, and its status and resolution. X 26. Provide Customer access to Help Desk Service tracking System, including full detail of Problem, Service Request, and its status and resolution. X 27. Perform Problem determination, including determination of whether a database -related Problem is logical or physical. X 28. Resolve calls at the first point of contact, or escalate to Level 2 Support or Level 3 Support in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 29. Provide training and participate in knowledge transfer activities on Customer Controlled Applications, as applicable and covered under the technologies supported X 30. Participate in training and knowledge transfer activities on Customer Controlled Applications as applicable and covered under the technologies supported X 31. Provide the Authorized Users basic user instruction for Software. X 32. Perform Root Cause Analysis and escalate Problems in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 33. Escalate Problems to other support groups and organizations in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 34. Dispatch on -site assistance through Customer approved third -party vendors if needed. X 35. Interface with other Services and other support functions and departments as defined in the Policy & Procedures Manual X 36. Use remote control Software tools, with the Authorized User's approval, to Resolve Problems, if possible. X 37. Utilize SYSTEMTASK, the Help Desk Service tracking System to expedite management of Help Desk calls. X 38. Open, log, prioritize and monitor progress of Problems and Service Requests. X 39. Interview the Authorized User for all relevant information concerning Problems and Service Requests, including Authorized User name, Authorized User location/department, Authorized User phone number, nature of Problem or Service Request, Severity Level (if applicable), deadlines for Resolution, expected time of call back from Help Desk, and description of the Problem or Service Request. X 40. Resolve all Problems while on the telephone, if possible, using appropriate Software tools, where possible, and document Resolution. X 41. Verify that no Service Request already exists for the inquiry before opening a new ticket related to such Service Request. X 42. Perform management of Problems and Service Requests in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 43. Assist in prioritization of Service Requests. X 44. Provide appropriate access and authorization for System and applications password resets. X 45. Provide appropriate scripts and validation procedures for resetting passwords. X 46. Perform Authorized User Account Management. X AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 9 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement Hel'p.Desk Servfses AT&T, 6stainer -, 47. Approve Authorized User account creation. X 48. Create Authorized User accounts. X 49. Perform password resets. X 50. Re-route misdirected calls and transfer Service Request information as defined in the Policy & Procedures Manual X 51. Escalate Problems and Service Requests in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 52. Maintain and make available to the applicable Customer group member, Eligible Recipient and Authorized User the current status of all open tickets related to Problems and Service Requests. X 53. Provide status and updates on tickets related to Problems and Service Requests at the Authorized User's request and in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 54. Provide scheduled and non-scheduled outage notifications to the Customer group members, Eligible Recipients, and Authorized Users, and as defined in the Policy & Procedures Manual X 55. Transmit e-mail notification to appropriate Authorized User, indicating Resolution of the applicable Problem or Service Request upon closing of the related ticket. X 56. Re -open ticket if the affected Authorized User indicates that the Problem was not Resolved to his or her satisfaction. Transfer such Authorized User to appropriate AT&T team leader or subject matter expert for Resolution. X 57. Provide SYSTEMTASK knowledge management System and resolver knowledge management System for Problem Resolution and self-service. X Coordlnatfon.bf Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support 58. Coordinate appropriate Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support contact information in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X X 59. Maintain appropriate Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support contact information. X 60. Document all actions in the call record; including completing detailed Resolution information for all Problems and Service Requests. X 61. Call the Authorized User for further information, if necessary. X 62. Perform Root Cause Analysis in accordance with the Agreement. X 63. Work with Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support staff, which may include Customer Third Party Contractors or Managed Third Parties (as appropriate) to Resolve Problems and Service Requests, in accordance with the Agreement and Policy & Procedures Manual. X 64. Make recommendations for process and tool improvements. X 65. Approve recommendations for process and tool improvements. X 66. Implement recommendations for process and tool improvements. X 67. Contact other support groups and organizations, as required. X 68. Dispatch approved third -party on -site assistance, if needed, and as defined in the Policy & Procedures Manual X 69. Interface with other Service s and other support functions and departments, and as defined in the Policy & Procedures Manual X 70. Route and/or reassign calls to Level 2 Support or Level 3 Support, as required under the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 71. Notify the appropriate Authorized User and Level 1 Support of the Resolution of Problems and Service Requests, as applicable. X 72. Escalate Problems and Service Requests in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 73. Identify Problems and Service Requests that should have been Resolved at Level 1 Support, and determine whether such Problems and Service Requests were inappropriately escalated to Level 2 Support or Level 3 Support. X 74. Contact appropriate Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support to obtain clarification or information regarding status of tickets related to Problems and/or, as applicable, Service Requests. X 75. Obtain confirmation from Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support regarding closure of tickets related to the Resolution of Problems and Service Requests. X 76. Inform Customer of failures of Level 2 Support and/or Level 3 Support to cooperate with AT&T Help Desk Service. X Helpp Dosk Reporting 77. Provide requirements for Reports. X 78. Maintain and report statistics related to calls, Problems and Service Requests. X 79. Produce and provide Problem and Service Request inventory and status reports. X 80. Identify persons authorized to access the AT&T Help Desk Service tracking System. X 81. Provide access to the Help Desk Services on-line tracking System to Authorized User. X 82. Provide training (train the trainer) and training materials on the Help Desk Services tracking System to Authorized Users. X Trend Analysis 83. Provide call statistics for monthly trend analysis X AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 10 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement Hel'p.Desk Servfses AT&T, 6staindr -, 84. Provide Quarterly Trend Analysis for least cost support options discussions X X 85. Perform trend analysis on Help Desk calls, Problems and Service Requests. X 86. Create and distribute trend analysis reports. X 87. Review trend analysis reports. X 88. Discuss trend analysis reports at the next scheduled status meeting. X 89. Identify action items to improve performance. X 90. Assist AT&T in identifying action items to improve AT&T performance. X 91. Approve or reject action items proposed by AT&T. X 92. Implement action items. X Custohn& Sattsfae'tfon Surveys, 93. Approve or reject Customer satisfaction survey process and content in accordance with the Service Levels and Section 7.6 of the Agreement. X 94. Provide list of Authorized Users to exclude from satisfaction survey process. X 95. Distribute Customer satisfaction surveys, as appropriate and approved, upon closure of each ticket, which shall occur upon Resolution of the corresponding Problem or Service Request, in accordance with the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 96. Provide to Customer all satisfaction surveys and summary reporting. X Security Rep,'0A,' "and fvent Management - 97. Report security -related events through the defined security information management process as described in the Policy & Procedures Manual. X 98. Document and escalate security -related events in accordance with Customer's information security policies and procedures, including those policies and procedures set forth in the Policies and Procedures Manual. X Help Desk Business Continuity 99. Define business continuity requirements related to the Help Desk Service. X 1 UU. Approve or reject business continuity requirements related to the Help Desk Service. X 101. Create and maintain business continuity plan consistent with Customer defined requirements. X 102. Approve business continuity plan. X 103. Implement approved business continuity plan with Customer requirements. X 104. Perform and share results of test of business continuity plan in accordance with the requirements. X Trend Calf Statistics and Least Cost Muddling 105. Provide Quarterly Call Statistics, Trend Reports X 106. Trend calls based on Technology, Time, User, Department, Root Fault X 107. Propose Cost Reduction or Expansion Methodologies based on Call Statistics and Trends X 108. Approve or Reject Cost Reduction or Expansion Requirements X 109. Make Changes to business continuity plan consistent with any Customer adjusted requirements. X 110. Approve business continuity plan. X 111. Implement adjusted business continuity plan with Customer requirements. X 112. Perform and share results of test of business continuity plan in accordance with the requirements. X 9. Migration Services: AT&T offers a customized and tailored approach towards supporting Customer's Transition and Migration to the hosted solution. AT&T follows best practices in preparation, environment set up, data migration, risk management, and integrity testing by supporting the Migration in 4 phases: Transition Support, Migration Support, Pre -Steady State Support and Post -Steady State Support. AT&T works closely with the Customer to understand the Customer's network, access and connectivity requirements and preferred migration timelines, then finalizes the Migration Plan to meet those specific requirements and preferences. During the initial Customer Transition meetings, the discovery process uncovers specific Customer/host migration peer to peer contacts, technical requirements, milestones and predecessors. Transition Support: During the Transition phase of the project, and led by a SPOC and dedicated Project Manager, AT&T provides a technical team to include the following resources: a Senior Network Engineer, a Senior Security Engineer, a Senior VM and Host Engineer, and a Senior Mail/Migration Engineer. By AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 11 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement providing a teaming approach, AT&T seeks to identify peer -to -peer interaction on the Customer side to most efficiently perform the `Transition' Phase of the project. The Transition Phase of the project is intended to prepare for Migration. During the Transition Phase, teams are identified, topology discovery is performed and custom dependencies, milestones and target dates are determined. Because each Customer has unique environments and internal support experience or limitations, this phase is intended to clearly understand both the Customer specific technical and process requirements for the Migration to occur with precision and timeliness. The following outline describes at a high level the Transition responsibilities: a. Supplier Internal Review & Transition Preparation b. Supplier / Client Review i. Network & Firewall Configuration Review ii. Circuit Connectivity Requirements & Scheduling iii. Profiling of Users iv. Grouping Mail Users v. Active Directory / Authentication Trust vi. Timelines and Cut Over Objectives vii. Predecessors and Dependencies Review viii. Cross-Domain/Intra-Domain Configuration Confirmation c. Internal Environment Preparation i. Mail Servers Set Up ii. Spam Virus Server Set Up iii. Archiving Server Set Up iv. Active Directory Trust Set Up & Testing v. Alternate VM Server Set Up as required vi. Connectivity Preparation d. Co -Existence Set Up: Co -existence is the recommended method to migrate users `over the wire' and have both servers operating in a production environment at the same time. i. Connect `Hooks' from Host to Customer GroupWise Environment ii. Test Connectivity between Host and Customer environment with Customer Administrator e. Administrative Access Knowledge Transfer with Customer Migration Support: The Migration Phase addresses the tactical migration of data. Migration is broken into logical methodologies including Pre -Deployment Assessments, Test User Migration & Confirmation, Data Integrity Assessments, and segmented User Migration (pre -defined user groups) and Testing. The Migration process is done in a pre -planned method where subsets of users are moved to the host and tested to confirm data integrity. Consistent communication between the suppliers dedicated PM and migration team and the Customer's Administrator(s) are provided with each subset of users and subsequent test. Reports are delivered with each milestone as defined below. AT&T follows strict but efficient migration strategy to allow for not only timely migration but also the pro -active management of data integrity. f. Pre -Deployment Data Integrity Assessment as required g. Confirmation of User Groups h. Test Data Migration i. Migrate Test User Group — Typically Admins, IT Staff ii. Test Data Integrity Assessment iii. Customer Verification of Data iv. Supplier VM Replication Testing i. Migration of User Group 1: i. Migration of Data ii. Testing of Data Integrity iii. Customer Verification of Data Accessibility iv. Manual Remediation as Required j. Migration of User Group 2 etc. k. MX Records Swing i. MX Records follow the bulk of mail Pre -Steady State Tuning & Knowledge Transfer: Pre -Steady State Tuning is defined by a two week time period after final migrated users base. During this time, the host is in production, but the Supplier expects AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 12 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement that there may be fine-tuning of the hosted environment and training to best prepare user and administrators to operate comfortably in the new environment. I. User Access Questions m. Smart Phone Access Questions n. Anti -Spam Settings Tuning o. Customer Administrative Access i. Mail ii. AS/AV iii. Archive p. User Knowledge Transfer— GroupWise to Exchange i. Web Ex Options ii. Onsite Options iii. Leave Behind — How To Documentation q. Administrative Knowledge Transfer - GroupWise to Exchange i. Web Ex Options ii. Onsite Option Project Time Frame and Service Hours (a) The Services provided hereunder shall be performed Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., local time excluding designated AT&T holidays ("Normal Business Hours"), unless otherwise noted herein. AT&T Designated Holiday Date Observed New Year's Day January 1 Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day July 4 Labor Day 1st Monday in September Thanksgiving Day 4th Thursday in November Day After Thanksgiving 4th Friday in November Christmas Day December 25 (b) Hourly rates for Services provided outside of Normal Business hours are set forth below in pricing section; AT&T will invoice Customer at this rate for any such Services requested in writing by the Customer. 9. Fees and Charges 9.1 AT&T shall provide the Services for the Charges stated below for 24 months. See Table below for breakdown of VDI Pricing with minimum 75 desktops. Pricing is based on bundled rates with the Hosted Exchange Services provided under separate contract. Hosted Exchange must also be implemented by December 31, 2012 for pricing to remain valid. 9.1.1 VDI Pricing: Description Charges One Time Fees: VDI WAIVED NRC TOTAL: $0.00 Monthly Recurring Fees: VDI $9,164.43 24 Month TOTAL: 1 $219,946.32 Total Contract Pricing: $219,946.32 9.2 Additional Pricing Terms and Conditions (a) Defined Scope. Pricing is based on the currently defined Scope of Work and valid through October 31, 2012. Pricing is also based on a minimum of 75 desktops. Any additions or changes to this SOW will necessitate changes in pricing. Pricing herein assumes no project delays will occur that would require AT&T to stop work. AT&T will not be held financially responsible for project delays outside of its control (b) Invoicing. AT&T will invoice any One-time fees upon contract signature. AT&T MRC invoices will be presented on a monthly basis and will cover Services and any one-time charges provided during the previous calendar month. Pricing does not include shipping or applicable taxes. AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 13 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate TM at&t AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement NOTE: VDI must be implemented by December 31, 2012. Pricing is based on bundled rates with the Hosted Exchange Services provided under separate contract. Hosted Exchange must also be implemented by December 31, 2012 for pricing to remain valid. (c) Travel and related Expenses. Pricing does not include expenses for AT&T travel to Customer's facilities. Standard business expenses (e.g., transportation, food, lodging) incurred by AT&T in connection with delivery of the Services will be billed at cost as a separate line item on Customer's invoice. AT&T personnel will incur travel expenses only after receiving permission from Customer's authorized Project Manager. (d) Time and Material ("T&M") Rate. In the event that the scope of work changes from the described services in this SOW or AT&T is requested to perform Services outside of Normal Business Hours, AT&T will bill Customer at the T&M rate of one hundred forty dollars ($140.00) per hour per AT&T Consultant for the additional time spent on the change requests. All such out of scope matters will be handled via the Change Control process outlined herein. 10. Engagement Assumptions This SOW is based on the following assumptions. If any of these assumptions are found to be inaccurate or invalid, AT&T shall provide Customer with the changes to the scope, tasks, deliverables or terms and conditions of this SOW via the Change Control Process described in this SOW. • Customer will provide AT&T with requested information in a timely manner, and takes full responsibility and liability for the accuracy of all information supplied to AT&T by Customer and which AT&T relies upon in its performance hereunder. • Customer will comply with all responsibilities identified in the Customer Responsibilities section herein. In addition, Customer takes full responsibility and liability for the accuracy of all information supplied to AT&T by Customer and/or its representatives upon which AT&T relies on in the performance of this Agreement. AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 14 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate umnon��wk� at&l Table 1: VDI - 75 Minimum AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement VDI Summary Pricing per Desktop: Monthly Yearly 24MoTerm CORE Infrastructure Price per Desktop $ 34.30 $ 411.54 $ 823.09 Licensing Price per Desktop $ 83.49 $1,001.86 $ 2,003.71 Management Price per Desktop $ 4.41 $ 52.91 $ 105.82 Total VDI Instance per Desktop $ 122.19 1 $ 1,466.31 $ 2,932.62 Cust 24 M Total Component Type MRC Qty Cust MRC Cust ARC MRC RC Cult Price Price UCS Blade Slot Access Blade Slot $50.05 0.38 IF $62.56 $23.77 $285.29 $570.57 UCS Fabric per Blade Blade Fabric $174.29 0.38 $217.86 $82.79 $993.45 $1,986.91 UCS Blade w/256G, 20C Blade Server $1,954.34 0.38 $2,442.93 7 $928.31 $11,139.74 $22,279.48 Power Per Blade I Power Usage 1 $92.95 0.38 $116.19 1 $44.15 $529.82 $1,059.63 Aggregate Hard Disc -Shared SAN Gb (1024 GB in 1 Tb) $245.00 4 $306.25 $1,225.00 $14,700.00 $29,400.00 Aggregate Disc-SharedNAS Gb (1024 GB in 1 Tb) $133.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 N+HADesign Blades $2,271.63 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Second DC Fault Tolerance DC $2,271.63 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 VM FT/vLockstep Mirror VM 1 $286.001 0 1 $0.00 1, $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 IP Access 95th Percentile Mbps $214.50 1 $268.13 $268.13 $3,217.50 7 $6,435.00 11 $2,572.15 $30p865.79 $61,731.58 RAM/SVR Al location VMServerInstance- Mandatory Est $17.16 2 $22.31 $44.62 $535.39 $1,070.78 XenDesktop/XenDesktop Unique User Controller Licensing $16.02 75 $20.83 $1,561.95 $18,743.40 $37,486.80 Vmware VM Workstation Concurrent instance Licensing $14.01 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Concurrent Windows 7 Licensing $10.00 75 $15.00 $1,125.00 $13,500.00 $27,000.00 Concurrent Windows RIDS CAL Licensing $0.00 75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Concurrent MS Office Instance Licensing $30.03 75 $39.25 $2,944.06 $35,328.72 $70,657.44 Concurrent Anti Virus - Symantec ESM Licensing $6.01 75 $7.81 $585.98 $7,031.70 $14,063.40 Mirrored VM Licensing- Unique User Mandatory Licensing $35.75 0 $35.75 $0.00 IF $0.00 $0.00 IM $6,261.60 $75,139.21 $150,278.43 Support PS $135.85 1 $169.80 $169.80 $2,037.60 $4,075.20 Desk PS $64.35 2 $80.44 IF $160.88 $1,930.50 $3,861.00 5330.68 $1,968.101r $7,936.20 Total hVDI1 $2,572.15 ' $30,865.79 $61,731.58 Total Licensing PerhVDl $6,261.60 $75,139.21 $150,278.43 Total Management Per hVDI $330.68 $3,968.10 $7,936.20 Grand Total PerhVDl $9,164.43 $109973.10 i$219,946.21' Non Recurring Charges NRC: Initial Consultation & Discovery PS $214.50 $8,043.75 WAIVED $0.00 NRC: Baseline Environment Build Unit $4,290.00 $4,290.00 WAIVED $0.00 NRC: VM Build Units $169.81 $9,551.95 WAIVED $0.00 AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 15 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate umnon��wk� aW APPENDIX A: Network Build Load B. AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement Cisco UCS Compellent Storage Customer Disaster Recovey AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 16 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate umnon��wk� aW AT&T Network Integration Services Agreement APPENDIX B: S II'III'°''IIL..IIII CHANGE REQUEST FORM Type of Request: Initiator (Company): Change Request Received by: Price Impact: AT&T Additional Resources Req'd: Task Description: Other information related to Change: Impact of Change Provide a description of the impact of the change (increase in duration, delay in start, cut -over date change, added dependency, additional resources required change to design, change to baseline solution, other). AGREED and ACCEPTED: CUSTOMER: By: (Authorized Agent or Representative) (Typed or Printed Name) (Title) (Date) AGREED and ACCEPTED: AT&T By: (Authorized Agent or Representative) (Typed or Printed Name) (Title) (Date) AT&T and Customer Proprietary Confidential Page 17 of 17 Do not disclose or duplicate Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts Table of Contents 1. No Quantity Guarantees......................................................................................................... 1 2. Definitions..............................................................................................................................1 3. General Provisions................................................................................................................. 2 A. Entire Agreement.......................................................................................................... 2 B. Modification of Contract Terms and/or Amendments .................................................. 2 C. Invalid Term or Condition............................................................................................ 2 D. Assignment................................................................................................................... 2 E. Survival.........................................................................................................................3 F. Choice of Law............................................................................................................... 3 4. Contract Fulfillment and Promotion...................................................................................... 3 A. Service, Sales and Support of the Contract................................................................... 3 B. Internet Access to Contract and Pricing Information................................................... 3 1) Vendor Website...................................................................................................... 3 2) Accurate and Timely Contract Information............................................................ 3 3) Website Compliance Checks.................................................................................. 3 4) Website Changes..................................................................................................... 3 5) Use of Access Data Prohibited............................................................................... 4 6) Responsibility for Content...................................................................................... 4 C. DIR Logo...................................................................................................................... 4 D. Vendor Logo................................................................................................................. 4 E. Trade Show Participation.............................................................................................. 4 F. Performance Review Meetings..................................................................................... 5 G. DIR Cost Avoidance..................................................................................................... 5 5. Purchase Orders, Invoices, and Payments............................................................................. 5 A. Purchase Orders............................................................................................................ 5 B. Invoices......................................................................................................................... 5 C. Payments....................................................................................................................... 5 6. Contract Administration......................................................................................................... 5 A. Contract Administrators................................................................................................ 5 1) State Contract Administrator.................................................................................. 5 2) Vendor Contract Administrator.............................................................................. 6 B. Reporting and Administrative Fees.............................................................................. 6 1) Reporting Responsibility........................................................................................ 6 2) Detailed Monthly Report........................................................................................ 6 3) Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontract Reports ................................... 6 4) DIR Administrative Fee.......................................................................................... 6 5) Accurate and Timely Submission of Reports......................................................... 7 C. Records and Audit......................................................................................................... 7 01/07/08 i Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts D. Contract Administration Notification........................................................................... 8 7. Vendor Responsibilities......................................................................................................... 8 A. Indemnification............................................................................................................. 8 B. Taxes/Worker's Compensation/UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE .......................... 9 C. Vendor Certifications.................................................................................................. 10 D. Ability to Conduct Business in Texas......................................................................... 11 E. Equal Opportunity Compliance.................................................................................. 11 F. Use of Subcontractors................................................................................................. 11 G. Responsibility for Actions.......................................................................................... 11 H. Confidentiality............................................................................................................ 12 L Security of Premises, Equipment, Data and Personnel ............................................... 12 J. Background and/or Criminal History Investigation.................................................... 12 K. Limitation of Liability................................................................................................. 12 L. Purchase of Commodity Items (Applicable to State Agency Purchases Only)........................................................................................................................... 12 M. Overcharges................................................................................................................ 13 N. Prohibited Conduct..................................................................................................... 13 8. Contract Enforcement.......................................................................................................... 13 A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution...................................................... 13 B. Termination.................................................................................................................14 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation..................................................................... 14 2) Absolute Right...................................................................................................... 14 3) Termination for Convenience............................................................................... 14 4) Termination for Cause.......................................................................................... 14 a) Contract...........................................................................................................14 b) Purchase Order................................................................................................ 14 5) Customer Rights Under Termination.................................................................... 15 6) Vendor Rights Under Termination....................................................................... 15 C. Force Majeure............................................................................................................. 15 9. Notification.......................................................................................................................... 15 A. Notices........................................................................................................................ 15 B. Handling of Written Complaints................................................................................. 15 10. Captions............................................................................................................................... 16 01/07/08 ii Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts 1. No Quantity Guarantees The Contract is not exclusive to the Vendor. Customers may obtain services from other sources during the term of the Contract. DIR makes no express or implied warranties whatsoever that any particular quantity or dollar amount of services will be procured through the Contract. 2. Definitions A. Customer - any Texas state agency, unit of local government, institution of higher education as defined in Section 2054.003, Texas Government Code, and those state agencies purchasing from a DIR contract through an Interagency Agreement, as authorized by Chapter 771, Texas Government Code, any local government as authorized through the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, the state agencies and political subdivisions of other states as authorized by Section 2054.0565, Texas Government Code, and, except for telecommunications services under Chapter 2170, Texas Government Code, assistance organizations as defined in Section 2175.001, Texas Government Code to mean: i. A non-profit organization that provides educational, health or human services or assistance to homeless individuals; ii. A nonprofit food bank that solicits, warehouses, and redistributes edible but unmarketable food to an agency that feeds needy families and individuals; iii. Texas Partners of the Americas, a registered agency with the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid, with the approval of the Partners of the Alliance Office of the Agency for International Development; iv. A group, including a faith -based group, that enters into a financial or non -financial agreement with a health or human services agency to provide services to that agency's clients; V. A local workforce development board created under Section 2308.253; vi. A nonprofit organization approved by the Supreme Court of Texas that provides free legal services for low-income households in civil matters; vii. The Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc., or an entity designated by the commissioner of agriculture as the foundation's successor entity under Section 74.1011, Texas Agriculture Code; viii. A nonprofit computer bank that solicits, stores, refurbishes and redistributes used computer equipment to public school students and their families; and ix. A nonprofit organization that provides affordable housing. B. Contract — the document executed between DIR and Vendor into which this Appendix A is incorporated. C. CPA — refers to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts D. Day - shall mean business days, Monday through Friday, except for State and Federal holidays. If the Contract calls for performance on a day that is not a business day, then performance is intended to occur on the next business day. E. Purchase Order - the Customer's fiscal form or format, which is used when making a purchase (e.g., formal written Purchase Order, Procurement Card, Electronic Purchase Order, or other authorized instrument). 01/07/08 Page 1 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts F. State — refers to the State of Texas. 3. General Provisions A. Entire Agreement The Contract and its Appendices constitute the entire agreement between DIR and the Vendor. No statement, promise, condition, understanding, inducement or representation, oral or written, expressed or implied, which is not contained in the Contract or its Appendices shall be binding or valid. B. Modification of Contract Terms and/or Amendments 1) The terms and conditions of the Contract shall govern all transactions by Customers under the Contract. The Contract may only be modified or amended upon mutual written agreement of DIR and Vendor. 2) Customers shall not have the authority to modify the terms of the Contract; however, additional Customer terms and conditions that do not conflict with the Contract and are acceptable to Vendor may be added in a Purchase Order and given effect. No additional term or condition added in a Purchase Order issued by a Customer can weaken a term or condition of the Contract. Pre-printed terms and conditions on any Purchase Order issued by Customer hereunder will have no force and effect. In the event of a conflict between a Customer's Purchase Order and the Contract, the Contract term shall control. C. Invalid Term or Condition 1) To the extent any term or condition in the Contract conflicts with the applicable Texas and/or United States law or regulation, such Contract term or condition is void and unenforceable. By executing a contract which contains the conflicting term or condition, DIR makes no representations or warranties regarding the enforceability of such term or condition and DIR does not waive the applicable Texas and/or United States law or regulation which conflicts with the Contract term or condition. 2) If one or more term or condition in the Contract, or the application of any term or condition to any party or circumstance, is held invalid, unenforceable, or illegal in any respect by a final judgment or order of the State Office of Administrative Hearings or a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Contract and the application of the term or condition to other parties or circumstances shall remain valid and in full force and effect. D. Assignment DIR or Vendor may assign the Contract without prior written approval to: i) a successor in interest (for DIR, another state agency as designated by the Texas Legislature), or ii) a subsidiary, parent company or affiliate, or iii) as necessary to satisfy a regulatory requirement imposed upon a party by a governing body with the appropriate authority. Assignment of the Contract under the above terms shall require written notification by the assigning party. Any other assignment by a party shall require the written consent of the other party. Each party agrees to cooperate to amend the Contract as necessary to maintain an accurate record of the contracting parties. O1/07/08 Page 2 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts E. Survival All applicable service agreements that were entered into between Vendor and a Customer under the terms and conditions of the Contract shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract. All Purchase Orders issued and accepted by Vendor shall survive expiration or termination of the Contract. F. Choice of Law The laws of the State of Texas shall govern the construction and interpretation of the Contract. Nothing in the Contract or its Appendices shall be construed to waive the State's sovereign immunity. 4. Contract Fulfillment and Promotion A. Service, Sales and Support of the Contract Vendor shall provide service, sales and support resources to serve all Customers throughout the State. It is the responsibility of the Vendor to sell, market, and promote services available under the Contract. Vendor shall use its best efforts to ensure that potential Customers are made aware of the existence of the Contract. All sales to Customers for services available under the Contract shall be processed through the Contract. B. Internet Access to Contract and Pricing Information 1) Vendor Website Within thirty (30) days from the effective date of the Contract, Vendor will establish and maintain a website specific to the service offerings under the Contract which is clearly distinguishable from other, non-DIR Contract offerings at Vendor's website. The website must include: the services offered, service specifications, Contract pricing, contact information for Vendor, instructions for obtaining quotes and placing Purchase Orders. The Vendor's website shall list the DIR Contract number, reference the DIR Go DIRect program, display the DIR logo in accordance with the requirements in paragraph D of this Section, and contain a link to the DIR website for the Contract. 2) Accurate and Timely Contract Information Vendor warrants and represents that the website information specified in the above paragraph will be accurately and completely posted, maintained and displayed in an objective and timely manner. Vendor, at its own expense, shall correct any non- conforming or inaccurate information posted at Vendor's website within ten (10) business days after written notification by DIR. 3) Website Compliance Checks Periodic compliance checks of the information posted for the Contract on Vendor's website will be conducted by DIR. Upon request by DIR, Vendor shall provide verifiable documentation that pricing listed upon this website is uniform with the pricing as stated within Section 4 of the Contract. 4) Website Changes Vendor hereby consents to a link from the DIR website to Vendor's website in order to facilitate access to Contract information. The establishment of the link is provided O1/07/08 Page 3 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts solely for convenience in carrying out the business operations of the State. DIR reserves the right to terminate or remove a link at any time, in its sole discretion, without advance notice, or to deny a future request for a link. DIR will provide Vendor with subsequent notice of link termination or removal. Vendor shall provide DIR with timely written notice of any change in URL or other information needed to access the site and/or maintain the link. 5) Use of Access Data Prohibited If Vendor stores, collects or maintains data electronically as a condition of accessing Contract information, such data shall only be used internally by Vendor for the purpose of implementing or marketing the Contract, and shall not be disseminated to third parties or used for other marketing purposes. The Contract constitutes a public document under the laws of the State and Vendor shall not restrict access to Contract terms and conditions including pricing, i.e., through use of restrictive technology or passwords. 6) Responsibility for Content Vendor is solely responsible for administration, content, intellectual property rights, and all materials at Vendor's website. DIR reserves the right to require a change of listed content if, in the opinion of DIR, it does not adequately represent the Contract. C. DIR Logo Vendor may use the DIR logo in the promotion of the Contract to Customers with the following stipulations: (i) the logo may not be modified in any way, (ii) when displayed, the size of the DIR logo must be equal to or smaller than the Vendor logo, (iii) the DIR logo is only used to communicate the availability of services under the Contract to Customers, and (iv) any other use of the DIR logo requires prior written permission from DIR. D. Vendor Logo DIR may use the Vendor's name and logo in the promotion of the Contract to communicate the availability of services under the Contract to Customers. Use of the logos may be on the DIR website or on printed materials. Any use of Vendor's logo by DIR must comply with and be solely related to the purposes of the Contract and any usage guidelines communicated to DIR from time to time. Nothing contained in the Contract will give DIR any right, title, or interest in or to Vendor's trademarks or the goodwill associated therewith, except for the limited usage rights expressly provided by Vendor. E. Trade Show Participation At DIR's discretion, Vendor may be required to participate in one or more DIR sponsored trade shows each calendar year. Vendor understands and agrees that participation, at the Vendor's expense, includes providing a manned booth display or similar presence. DIR will provide four months advance notice of any required participation. Vendor must display the DIR logo at all trade shows that potential Customers will attend. DIR reserves the right to approve or disapprove of the location or the use of the DIR logo in or on the Vendor's booth. 01/07/08 Page 4 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts F. Performance Review Meetings DIR will require the Vendor to attend periodic meetings to review the Vendor's performance under the Contract. The meetings will be held within the Austin, Texas area at a date and time mutually acceptable to DIR and the Vendor. DIR shall bear no cost for the time and travel of the Vendor for attendance at the meeting. G. DIR Cost Avoidance As part of the performance measures reported to state leadership, DIR must provide the cost avoidance the State has achieved through the Contract. Upon request by DIR, Vendor shall provide DIR with a detailed report of a representative sample of service sold under the Contract. The report shall contain: service description, list price, price to Customer under the Contract, and pricing from three (3) alternative sources under which DIR customers can procure the services. 5. Purchase Orders, Invoices, and Payments A. Purchase Orders All Customer Purchase Orders will be placed directly with the Vendor. Accurate Purchase Orders shall be effective and binding upon Vendor when accepted by Vendor. B. Invoices 1) Invoices shall be submitted by the Vendor directly to the Customer and shall be issued in compliance with Chapter 2251, Texas Government Code. All payments for services purchased under the Contract and any provision of acceptance of such services shall be made by the Customer to the Vendor. 2) Invoices must be timely and accurate. Each invoice must match Customer's Purchase Order and include any written changes that may apply, as it relates to services, prices and quantities. Invoices must include the Customer's Purchase Order number or other pertinent information for verification of receipt of the services by the Customer. C. Payments Customers shall comply with Chapter 2251, Texas Government Code, in making payments to Vendor. Payment under the Contract shall not foreclose the right to recover wrongful payments. 6. Contract Administration A. Contract Administrators DIR and the Vendor will each provide a Contract Administrator to support the Contract. Information regarding the Contract Administrators will be posted on the Internet website designated for the Contract. 1) State Contract Administrator DIR shall provide a Contract Administrator whose duties shall include but not be limited to: i) supporting the marketing and management of the Contract, ii) advising DIR of Vendor's performance under the terms and conditions of the Contract, and iii) 01/07/08 Page 5 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts periodic verification of pricing and monthly reports submitted by Vendor. 2) Vendor Contract Administrator Vendor shall provide a dedicated Contract Administrator whose duties shall include but not be limited to: i) supporting the marketing and management of the Contract, ii) facilitating dispute resolution between Vendor and a Customer, and iii) advising DIR of Vendor's performance under the terms and conditions of the Contract. DIR reserves the right to require a change in Vendor's then -current Contract Administrator if the assigned Contract Administrator is not, in the opinion of DIR, adequately serving the needs of the State. B. Reporting and Administrative Fees 1) Reporting Responsibility a) Vendor shall be responsible for reporting all services purchased under the Contract. Vendor shall file the monthly reports, subcontract reports, and pay the administrative fees in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. b) DIR shall have the right to verify required reports and to take any actions necessary to enforce its rights under this section, including but not limited to, compliance checks of Vendor's applicable Contract books at DIR's expense. 2) Detailed Monthly Report Vendor shall electronically provide DIR with a detailed monthly report in the format required by DIR showing the dollar volume of any and all sales under the Contract for the previous month period. Reports shall be submitted to the DIR Go DIRect Coordinator. Reports are due on the fifteenth (15'h) calendar day after the close of the previous month period. The monthly report shall include, per transaction: the detailed sales for the period, Customer name, invoice date, invoice number, description, quantity, unit price, extended price, Customer Purchase Order number, contact name, Customer's complete billing address, and other information as required by DIR. Each report must contain all information listed above per transaction or the report will be rejected and returned to the Vendor for correction in accordance with this section. 3) Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontract Reports a) Vendor shall electronically provide each Customer with their relevant Historically Underutilized Business Subcontracting Report, pursuant to the Contract, as required by Chapter 2161, Texas Government Code. Reports shall also be submitted to DIR. b) Reports shall be due in accordance with the CPA rules. 4) DIR Administrative Fee a) An administrative fee shall be paid by Vendor to DIR to defray the DIR costs of negotiating, executing, and administering the Contract. The administrative fee shall be specified in the Contract. Payment of the administrative fee shall be due on the fifteenth (15�h) calendar day after the close of the previous month period. b) Vendor shall reference the DIR Contract number on any remittance instruments. O1/07/08 Page 6 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts 5) Accurate and Timely Submission of Reports a) The reports and administrative fees shall be accurate and timely and submitted in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. Vendor shall correct any inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. Vendor shall deliver any late reports or late administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. If Vendor is unable to correct inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments or deliver late reports and fee payments within three (3) business days, Vendor must contact DIR and provide a corrective plan of action, including the timeline for completion of correction. The corrective plan of action shall be subject to DIR approval. b) Should Vendor fail to correct inaccurate reports or cure the delay in timely delivery of reports and payments within the corrective plan of action timeline, DIR reserves the right to require an independent third party audit of the Vendor's records as specified in C.3 of this Section, at DIR's expense. C. Records and Audit 1) Acceptance of funds under the Contract by Vendor acts as acceptance of the authority of the State Auditor's Office, or any successor agency, to conduct an audit or investigation in connection with those funds. Vendor further agrees to cooperate fully with the State Auditor's Office or its successor in the conduct of the audit or investigation, including providing all records requested. Vendor will ensure that this clause concerning the authority to audit funds received indirectly by subcontractors through Vendor and the requirement to cooperate is included in any subcontract it awards pertaining to the Contract. Under the direction of the Legislative Audit Committee, a Vendor that is the subject of an audit or investigation by the State Auditor's Office must provide the State Auditor's Office with access to any information the State Auditor's Office considers relevant to the investigation or audit. 2) Vendor shall maintain adequate records to establish compliance with the Contract until the later of a period of four (4) years after termination of the Contract or until full, final and unappealable resolution of all Compliance Check or litigation issues that arise under the Contract. Such records shall include per transaction: Customer name, invoice date, invoice number, description, quantity, unit price, extended price, Customer Purchase Order number, contact name, Customer's complete billing address, the calculations supporting each administrative fee owed DIR under the Contract, Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontracting reports, and such other documentation as DIR may request. 3) Vendor shall grant access to all paper and electronic records, books, documents, accounting procedures, practices and any other items relevant to the performance of the Contract to DIR, including the compliance checks designated by DIR, the State Auditor's Office and of the United States, and such other persons or entities designated by DIR for the purposes of inspecting, Compliance Checking and/or copying such books and records. Vendor shall provide copies and printouts requested by DIR without charge. DIR shall provide Vendor ten (10) business days' notice prior to inspecting, Compliance Checking, and/or copying Vendor's records. O1/07/08 Page 7 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts Vendor's records, whether paper or electronic, shall be made available during regular office hours. Vendor personnel familiar with the Vendor's books and records shall be available to DIR staff and designees as needed. Vendor shall provide adequate office space to DIR staff during the performance of Compliance Check. 4) For procuring State Agencies whose payments are processed by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, the volume of payments made to Vendor through the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and the administrative fee based thereon shall be presumed correct unless Vendor can demonstrate to DIR's satisfaction that Vendor's calculation of DIR's administrative fee is correct. D. Contract Administration Notification 1) Upon execution of the Contract, Vendor shall provide DIR with written notification of the following: i) Vendor Contract Administrator name and contact information, ii) Vendor sales representative name and contact information, and iii) name and contact information of Vendor personnel responsible for submitting reports and payment of administrative fees. 2) Upon execution of the Contract, DIR shall provide Vendor with written notification of the following: i) DIR Contract Administrator name and contact information, and ii) DIR Go DIRect Coordinator name and contact information. 7. Vendor Responsibilities A. Indemnification 1) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR VENDOR AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT DURING THE EXISTENCE OF THIS CONTRACT, IT IS FURNISHING SERVICES IN THE CAPACITY OF AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AND THAT VENDOR IS NOT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CUSTOMER, DIR OR THE STATE OF TEXAS. 2) Acts or Omissions Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas and Customers, AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR SUITS, AND ALL RELATED COSTS, ATTORNEY FEES, AND EXPENSES arising out of, or resulting from any acts or omissions of the Vendor or its agents, employees, subcontractors, Order Fulfillers, or suppliers of subcontractors in the execution or performance of the Contract and any Purchase Orders issued under the Contract REGARDLESS OF THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE CUSTOMER, THE STATE OF TEXAS AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES. VENDOR SHALL PAY ALL COSTS OF DEFENSE INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR 01/07/08 Page 8 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts TEXAS STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS AND BY CUSTOMER'S LEGAL COUNSEL FOR NON -STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS. 3) Infringements a) Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas and Customers, AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES from any and all third party claims involving infringement of United States patents, copyrights, trade and service marks, and any other intellectual or intangible property rights in connection with the PERFORMANCES OR ACTIONS OF VENDOR PURSUANT TO THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR AND THE CUSTOMER AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY SUCH CLAIM. VENDOR SHALL BE LIABLE TO PAY ALL COSTS OF DEFENSE INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR TEXAS STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS AND BY CUSTOMER'S LEGAL COUNSEL FOR NON -STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS. b) If Vendor becomes aware of an actual or potential claim, or Customer provides Vendor with notice of an actual or potential claim, Vendor may (or in the case of an injunction against Customer, shall), at Vendor's sole option and expense: (i) procure for the Customer the right to continue to use the affected portion of the product or service, or (ii) modify or replace the affected portion of the product or service with functionally equivalent or superior product or service so that Customer's use is non - infringing. 4) PROPERTY DAMAGE IN THE EVENT OF LOSS, DAMAGE, OR DESTRUCTION OF ANY PROPERTY OF CUSTOMER OR THE STATE DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE, MISCONDUCT, WRONGFUL ACT OR OMISSION ON THE PART OF THE VENDOR, ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, OR SUBCONTRACTORS, THE VENDOR SHALL PAY THE FULL COST OF EITHER REPAIR, RECONSTRUCTION, OR REPLACEMENT OF THE PROPERTY, AT THE CUSTOMER'S SOLE ELECTION. SUCH COST SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CUSTOMER AND SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE BY THE VENDOR NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE VENDORS RECEIPT FROM THE CUSTOMER OF A WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE AMOUNT DUE. B. Taxes/Worker's Compensation/UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1) VENDOR AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT DURING THE EXISTENCE OF THIS CONTRACT, VENDOR SHALL BE ENTIRELY 01/07/08 Page 9 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LIABILITY AND PAYMENT OF VENDOR'S AND VENDOR'S EMPLOYEES' TAXES OF WHATEVER KIND, ARISING OUT OF THE PERFORMANCES IN THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE TO ANY SUCH PERSONS, INCLUDING LAWS REGARDING WAGES, TAXES, INSURANCE, AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION. VENDOR AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT VENDOR ITS EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO ANY STATE BENEFIT OR BENEFIT OF ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY CUSTOMER. THE CUSTOMER AND/OR THE STATE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO THE VENDOR ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR OTHERS FOR THE PAYMENT OF TAXES OR THE PROVISION OF UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND/OR WORKERS' COMPENSATION OR ANY BENEFIT AVAILABLE TO A STATE EMPLOYEE OR EMPLOYEE OF ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY CUSTOMER. 2) VENDOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CUSTOMERS, THE STATE OF TEXAS AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR SUITS, AND ALL RELATED COSTS, ATTORNEY FEES, AND EXPENSES, RELATING TO TAX LIABILITY, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND/OR WORKERS' COMPENSATION OR EXPECTATIONS OF BENEFITS BY VENDOR, ITS EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS OR SUBCONTRACTORS IN ITS PERFORMANCE UNDER THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR SHALL BE LIABLE TO PAY ALL COSTS OF DEFENSE INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR TEXAS STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS AND BY CUSTOMER'S LEGAL COUNSEL FOR NON -STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS. C. Vendor Certifications Vendor certifies that it: (i) has not given, offered to give, and does not intend to give at any time hereafter any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant in connection with the Contract, (ii) is not currently delinquent in the payment of any franchise tax owed the State of Texas and is not ineligible to receive payment under §231.006 of the Texas Family Code and acknowledge the Contract may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate, (iii) neither they, nor anyone acting for them, have violated the antitrust laws of the United States or the State of Texas, nor communicated directly or indirectly to any competitor or any other person engaged in such line of business for the purpose of obtaining an unfair price advantage, (iv) has not received payment from DIR or any of its employees for participating in the preparation of the Contract, (v) under Section 2155.004, Texas Government Code, the vendor certifies that the individual or business entity named in this bid or contract is not ineligible to receive the specified contract and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and O1/07/08 Page 10 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate, (vi) to the best of their knowledge and belief, there are no suits or proceedings pending or threatened against or affecting them, which if determined adversely to them will have a material adverse effect on the ability to fulfill their obligations under the Contract, (vii) are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government as listed in the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained by the General Services Administration, and (viii) as of the effective date of the Contract, are not listed in the prohibited vendors list authorized by Executive Order 413224, "Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism ", published by the United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control. In addition, Vendor acknowledges the applicability of §2155.444 and §2155.4441, Texas Government Code, in fulfilling the terms of the Contract. D. Ability to Conduct Business in Texas Vendor shall be an entity authorized and validly existing under the laws of its state of organization, and shall be authorized to do business in the State of Texas. E. Equal Opportunity Compliance Vendor agrees to abide by all applicable laws, regulations, and executive orders pertaining to equal employment opportunity, including federal laws and the laws of the State in which its primary place of business is located. In accordance with such laws, regulations, and executive orders, the Vendor agrees that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, veteran status or handicap, be excluded from employment with or participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity performed by Vendor under the Contract. If Vendor is found to be not in compliance with these requirements during the term of the Contract, Vendor agrees to take appropriate steps to correct these deficiencies. Upon request, Vendor will furnish information regarding its nondiscriminatory hiring and promotion policies, as well as specific information on the composition of its principals and staff, including the identification of minorities and women in management or other positions with discretionary or decision -making authority. F. Use of Subcontractors If Vendor uses any subcontractors in the performance of this Contract, Vendor must make a good faith effort in the submission of its Subcontracting Plan in accordance with the State's Policy on Utilization of Historically Underutilized Businesses. A revised Subcontracting Plan shall be required before Vendor can engage additional subcontractors in the performance of this Contract. Vendor shall remain solely responsible for the performance of its obligations under the Contract. G. Responsibility for Actions Vendor is solely responsible for its actions and those of its agents, employees, or subcontractors, and agrees that neither Vendor nor any of the foregoing has any authority to act or speak on behalf of DIR or the State. 01/07/08 Page 11 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts H. Confidentiality 1) Vendor acknowledges that DIR is a government agency subject to the Texas Public Information Act. Vendor also acknowledges that DIR will comply with the Public Information Act, and with all opinions of the Texas Attorney General's office concerning this Act. 2) Under the terms of the Contract, DIR may provide Vendor with information related to Customers. Vendor shall not re -sell or otherwise distribute or release Customer information to any party in any manner. L Security of Premises, Equipment, Data and Personnel Vendor may, from time to time during the performance of the Contract, have access to the personnel, premises, equipment, and other property, including data, files and /or materials (collectively referred to as "Data") belonging to the Customer. Vendor shall use their best efforts to preserve the safety, security, and the integrity of the personnel, premises, equipment, Data and other property of the Customer, in accordance with the instruction of the Customer. Vendor shall be responsible for damage to Customer's equipment, workplace, and its contents when such damage is caused by its employees or subcontractors. J. Background and/or Criminal History Investigation Prior to commencement of any services, background and/or criminal history investigation of the Vendor's employees and subcontractors who will be providing services to the Customer under the Contract may be performed by certain Customers having legislative authority to require such investigations. Should any employee or subcontractor of the Vendor who will be providing services to the Customer under the Contract not be acceptable to the Customer as a result of the background and/or criminal history check, then Customer may immediately terminate its Purchase Order and related Service Agreement or request replacement of the employee or subcontractor in question. K. Limitation of Liability For any claim or cause of action arising under or related to the Contract: i) none of the parties shall be liable to the other for punitive, special, or consequential damages, even if it is advised of the possibility of such damages; and ii) Vendor's liability for damages of any kind to the Customer shall be limited to the total amount paid to Vendor under the Contract during the twelve months immediately preceding the accrual of the claim or cause of action. L. Purchase of Commodity Items (Applicable to State Agency Purchases Only) 1) Texas Government Code, §2157.068 requires State agencies to buy commodity items, as defined in 7.L.2 below, in accordance with contracts developed by DIR, unless the agency obtains an exemption from DIR. 2) Commodity items are commercially available software, hardware and technology services that are generally available to businesses or the public and for which DIR determines that a reasonable demand exists in two or more state agencies. Hardware is the physical technology used to process, manage, store, transmit, receive or deliver information. Software is the commercially available programs that operate hardware 01/07/08 Page 12 of 16 8. Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts and includes all supporting documentation, media on which the software may be contained or stored, related materials, modifications, versions, upgrades, enhancements, updates or replacements. Technology services are the services, functions and activities that facilitate the design, implementation, creation, or use of software or hardware. Technology services include seat management, staffing augmentation, training, maintenance and subscription services. Technology services do not include telecommunications services. Seat management is services through which a state agency transfers its responsibilities to a vendor to manage its personal computing needs, including all necessary hardware, software and technology services. 3) Vendor agrees to coordinate all State agency commodity item sales through existing DIR contracts. Institutions of higher education are exempt from Subsection 7.L. M. Overcharges Vendor hereby assigns to DIR any and all of its claims for overcharges associated with this contract which arise under the antitrust laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C.A. Section 1, et seq., and which arise under the antitrust laws of the State of Texas, Tex. Bus. and Comm. Code Section 15.01, et seq. N. Prohibited Conduct Vendor represents and warrants that, to the best of its knowledge as of the date of this certification, neither Vendor nor any Order Fulfiller, subcontractor, firm, corporation, partnership, or institution represented by Vendor, nor anyone acting for such Order Fulfiller, subcontractor, firm, corporation or institution has: (1) violated the antitrust laws of the State of Texas under Texas Business & Commerce Code, Chapter 15, or the federal antitrust laws; or (2) communicated its response to the Request for Offer directly or indirectly to any competitor or any other person engaged in such line of business during the procurement for the Contract. Contract Enforcement A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party's failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party's right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in Travis County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, Customer, and Vendor agree in writing. 01/07/08 Page 13 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts B. Termination 1) Termination for Non -Appropriation Customer may terminate Purchase Orders if funds sufficient to pay its obligations under the Contract are not appropriated by the governing body on behalf of local governments, or by the Texas legislature on behalf of state agencies. In the event of non -appropriation, Vendor will be provided ten (10) calendar days written notice of intent to terminate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Customer issues a Purchase Order and has accepted delivery of the services, they are obligated to pay for those services. 2) Absolute Right DIR shall have the absolute right to terminate the Contract without recourse in the event that: i) Vendor becomes listed on the prohibited vendors list authorized by Executive Order 413224, 'Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism'; published by the United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, or ii) Vendor becomes suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government as listed in the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained by the General Services Administration. Vendor shall be provided written notice in accordance with Section 9.A, Notices, of intent to terminate. 3) Termination for Convenience DIR or Vendor may terminate the Contract, in whole or in part, by giving the other party thirty (30) calendar days written notice. A Customer may terminate a Purchase Order if it is determined by the Customer that Vendor will not be able to deliver services in a timely manner to meet the business needs of the Customer. 4) Termination for Cause a) Contract Either DIR or Vendor may issue a written notice of default to the other upon the occurrence of a material breach of any covenant, warranty or provision of the Contract. The non -defaulting party shall give the defaulting party thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of notice to cure said default. If the defaulting party fails to cure said default within the timeframe allowed, the non -defaulting party may, at its option and in addition to any other remedies it may have available, cancel and terminate the Contract. Customers purchasing services under the Contract have no power to terminate the Contract for default. b) Purchase Order Customer or Vendor may terminate a Purchase Order upon the occurrence of a material breach of any term or condition: (i) of the Contract, or (ii) included in the Purchase Order in accordance with Section 3.13.2 above. The non -defaulting party shall give the defaulting party thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of notice to cure said default. If the defaulting party fails to cure said default within the timeframe allowed, the non -defaulting party may, at its option and in addition to any other remedies it may have available, cancel and terminate the Purchase Order. 01/07/08 Page 14 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts 5) Customer Rights Under Termination In the event the Contract expires or is terminated for any reason, a Customer shall retain its rights under the Contract and the Purchase Order issued with respect to all services ordered and accepted prior to the effective termination date. 6) Vendor Rights Under Termination In the event a Purchase Order is terminated or the Contract expires or is terminated for any reason, a Customer shall pay all amounts due for services ordered prior to the effective termination date and ultimately accepted. C. Force Majeure DIR, Customer, or Vendor may be excused from performance under the Contract for any period when performance is prevented as the result of an act of God, strike, war, civil disturbance, epidemic, or court order, provided that the party experiencing the event of Force Majeure has prudently and promptly acted to take any and all steps that are within the party's control to ensure performance and to shorten the duration of the event of Force Majeure. The party suffering an event of Force Majeure shall provide notice of the event to the other parties when commercially reasonable. Subject to this provision, such non-performance shall not be deemed a default or a ground for termination. However, a Customer may terminate a Purchase Order if it is determined by the Customer that Vendor will not be able to deliver services in a timely manner to meet the business needs of the Customer. 9. Notification A. Notices All notices, demands, designations, certificates, requests, offers, consents, approvals and other instruments given pursuant to the Contract shall be in writing and shall be validly given on: (i) the date of delivery if delivered by email, facsimile transmission, mailed by registered or certified mail, or hand delivered, or (ii) three business days after being mailed via United States Postal Service. All notices under the Contract shall be sent to a party at the respective address indicated in Section 6 of the Contract or to such other address as such party shall have notified the other party in writing. B. Handling of Written Complaints In addition to other remedies contained in the Contract, a person contracting with DIR may direct their written complaints to the following office: Public Information Office Department of Information Resources Attn: Public Information Officer 300 W. 15'h Street, Suite 1300 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 475-4759, facsimile. O1/07/08 Page 15 of 16 Appendix A Standard Terms and Conditions For Services Contracts 10. Captions The captions contained in the Contract and its Appendices are intended for convenience and reference purposes only and shall in no way be deemed to define or limit any provision thereof 01/07/08 Page 16 of 16 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: 10/8/2012 Requested By: Stacey Osborne Department: Administration Report: Resolution: X Ordinance: Exhibits: A. Presentation from Eric Geisler B. Texas Enterprise Zone Resolution C. Ordinance # 2010-3248 D. Texas Enterprise Zone Overview Appropriation Source of Funds: Account Number: Amount Budgeted: Amount Requested: Budgeted Item: YES NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The Texas Enterprise Zone is an economic development program offered by the State of Texas that allows the State to promote job creation/retention and capital investment in economically distressed areas of the state. Companies that wish to apply for Texas Enterprise Zone project designation must have the nomination of a local community in order to participate. Companies can participate by either creating or retaining jobs, and they must commit to a minimum capital investment of $40,000 and creation or retention of a minimum of 10 jobs. The City of La Porte passed Ordinance Number 2010-3248 on May 10, 2010 authorizing the City's participation in the State of Texas Enterprise Zone program. Eric Geisler of Economic Incentives Inc., LLC will be requesting, on behalf of his client, INEOS USA, LLC (INEOS), that the Council pass a resolution nominating INEOS as a Texas Enterprise Zone project. The company is applying with a job retention project, and has committed to a capital investment of $1 billion and to the creation and/or retention of 415 jobs over the next five years. Mr. Geisler will discuss the Texas Enterprise Zone program and explain how INEOS qualifies for the program. Representatives from INEOS are also here this evening to answer any questions from the Council. Staff recommends approving the resolution designating INEOS USA, LLC as a Texas Enterprise Zone project. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action of a resolution designating INEOS USA, LLC as a State of Texas Enterprise Zone project. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager date 0 a o a, Om c � o O N LM a L L i +� O = LLI L 0 (U IIUUIUUIUUIUUIIUUIUUIUUIUUIUUI� U N Q L.L Q C: •� W m O U +� � L N O O v_ O Z 0 T T f N CL, J J J 0 m _cn O O O O CD cn L c� U 70 70 O a)L cn L O U N a)E N cn c� � a) U cn N N O O � O0 to c-0 O O O N E c c - N O O CD C) E E O c) c)E Co .. LO L? Ir- O O 09, U� Iq N ral Ln O O u i Ln O +, ro CL O U1 H O Ln N >iz N •�� O Ln 0 H O r6 > �O W •i rq .� E -0 O N •- -0 ru 0- E �_ N 0 o O O +J � x0 � Ou Ln ,.- u i ra 0 vi u s ro (1) cy) O u ro u O w -0 -0 ra m o1 ra a�-se E0 E s �' w � > •- w � �Q W o l'k o o o Ah, Ln O O a-•+ u i Ln H C: O O ry E O Ol � it O rq >, N Ln .. +� O O u E O 00 +J •Ln � O O .� +-+ O O Uri u u Old L s Ln ��'•�o a C aJ s ra • --n o) O u +� u ra u O s ro ro a3eEu'rE >, LOr1 - Ln N O > Ln -t W N Q W Ah, Ah�, M M 460 > T M imwv V' -) / \ V l O w"oil .a.... G O � o v , 0 LollW \ T V O V }J S � LV D` �V r BO �U L M l! l!1 � L Z N — r V � L V �1._ O ro Q — M ro J r ro Q0 + N UJ N 0 Ln ra � ro Ln E 0 0 U Ah" Ln Ln a� Ln N a--+ 0 A L Ln Z) c a� a Q E 0 m E E 0 V N a--+ Ln _0 Q E w 0 a� Ln c Q Ln m Ln w D E 0 V C/i 0 LU z Q) a--i ro .E 0 i 0 V 0 w >1 ' o V � C .--j ' L +, U.J 0 E V� N Q Q UlLn 'L N � 11 aj W 0 (!1 I Ilemw ^L\ W mi Ln .AI 1 VVV!! FM u L W 81, RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of La Porte (City) has previously passed Ordinance No. 2010-3248 electing to participate in the Texas Enterprise Zone Program, and the local incentives offered under this resolution are the same on this date as were outlined in Ordinance No. 2010-3248; WHEREAS, the Office of the Governor Economic Development and Tourism (EDC) through the Economic Development Bank (Bank) will consider INEOS USA, LLC as a Triple Jumbo enterprise project pursuant to a nomination and an application made by the City; WHEREAS, the City desires to pursue the creation of the proper economic and social environment in order to induce the investment of private resources in productive business enterprises located in the City and to provide employment to residents of enterprise zones and to other economically disadvantaged individuals; WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 2303, Subchapter F of the Texas Enterprise Zone Act, Texas Government Code (the "Act"), INEOS USA, LLC has applied to the City for designation as a triple jumbo enterprise project; WHEREAS, the City finds that INEOS USA, LLC meets the criteria for designation as a triple jumbo enterprise project under Chapter 2303, Subchapter F of the Act on the following grounds: INEOS USA, LLC is a "qualified business" under Section 2303.402 of the Act since it will be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business at a qualified business site located in an enterprise zone and at least twenty-five percent (25.0%) of the business' new employees will be residents of an enterprise zone or economically disadvantaged individuals; and 2. There has been and will continue to be a high level of cooperation between public, private, and neighborhood entities within the area; and The designation of INEOS USA, LLC as an enterprise project will contribute significantly to the achievement of the plans of the City for development and revitalization of the area. WHEREAS, the City finds that INEOS USA, LLC meets the criteria for tax relief and other incentives adopted by the City and nominates INEOS USA, LLC for triple jumbo enterprise project status on the grounds that it will be located at the qualified business site, will create a higher level of employment, economic activity and stability; and WHEREAS, the City finds that it is in the best interest of the City to nominate INEOS USA, LLC as a triple jumbo enterprise project pursuant to the Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: That the findings of the City and its actions approving this resolution taken at the council meeting are hereby approved and adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that INEOS USA, LLC is a "qualified business", as defined in Section 2303.402 of the Act, and meets the criteria for designation as an enterprise project, as set forth in Section 2303, Subchapter F of the Act. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the enterprise project shall take effect on the date of designation of the enterprise project by the agency and terminate on December 31, 2017. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of La Porte this 81h day of October, 2012. (SEAL) Louis R. Rigby Mayor THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS I, Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary of the City of La Porte, Texas do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution passed by the City of La Porte City Council on the this W" day of October, 2012. (City Seal) Patrice Fogarty City Secretary THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared of the City of La Porte, Texas, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office this _ day of , 2012. Notary Public, State of Texas My commission expires: (Notary Seal) REQUI,-ST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM - - - - - - - - -------------------------------- - Agenda Date Requested siltllE0 Requested By: _ St cey. Osborne Department: Administration . ................. Report: Resolution,: Ordinance: X ........................................... . ............ . . . . . ........................................................................ Exhibits: Public Hearin Notice Fxhibits: 'Vexas Enterprise. Zone Ordinance ............... . . ........... Exhibits: Appropriation Source of Funds: Account Number: Amount Budgeted: Amount Requested. Budgeted Item: YES NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION "The Texas EInterprise Zone is an economic development tool for local communities to partner with the State of Texas to promote job creation/retention and capital investment in economically distressed areas of the state. Conipanics that wish to apply for Texas Enterprise Zone designation must have the nomination of a local community in order to participate. This public hearing is part of the nomination process. Jubal Smith from Pricewaterhouse Coopers LL,C is representing Invista, and lac will be on -hand to answer any questions of Council and/or the Public. `rhe purpose of this hearing is to receive public input on the consideration of a city ordinance nominating INVISTA SA H., 12455 Strang Road, La Porte, TX 77571 for the Texas Enterprise Zone Program as an, Enterprise Project. Tax and other incentives may also be discussed at this hearing. At the hearing, interested parties are welcome to attend and present their views for or against the nomination, Following the public hearing, we would like Council to vote on the attached ordinance ordaining the City's participation in the Texas Enterprise Zone Program, designating a liaison: for communication with interested parties, and nominating INVISTA S.A r.l. to the Office of the Governor Economic Development &'Fourisrn (EDfl through the Economic Development Bank (Bank) as an Enterprise Project (Project). If the ordinance is passed, Invista will be nominated as an Enterprise Project and they will be eligible to apply for State tax abatements. The City of La Porte will not incur any costs as a result of this designation, and we will have used one of our five permitted designations for [lie 20,10-2011 period. and consider action approving the ordinance. Ron Bottorns, City Manager dame iA [$I I yKel a wil Sum] 11*14 1 a n= Notice is hereby g: that the City of La Porte will: conduct a pubilic hea,ri�ng at 6:00 P.M. on the 10th day of May, 2010, in, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 604 West Fai:rmion,it Parkway, La Porte, Texas. The purpose of this hearing is to receive pubilic input on the consideration of a city ordinance nominating INVISTA SA rl., 12455 Strang Road, La Porte, TX 77:571 for the Texas Enterprise Zone Program as an Enterprise Project. Tax and other incentives may also be discussed at this hearing. At the hearing, interested parties are 'welcome to attend and present their views for or against the nomination. A regular meeting of the La Porte City Council will follow the public hearing for the purpose of acting upon the public hearing items and to I conduGt other matters pertaining to Council. Citizeni,s wishing to addiress Council pro or con during the Pubilic Hearing wil;l be required to sign in before the meeting is convened. CITY OF LA PORTE M, artha Gillett, TRMC, CMIC City Secretary THIS FACILITY HAS DISABILIT ACCOMMODATIONS AVAILABIL REQUESTS FO ACCOMMODATIONS 0 INTERPRETIVE SERVICES A MEETINGS SHOULD BE MADE 4 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETIN A 41 PLEASE CONTACT THE CIT SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT #28 3 471-5020 OR THE TDDi LINE A #281-471-5030 FOR FURTHE INFORMATION, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas, or-d-aimng authorizing the City's participation in the Texas Enterprise Zone Program pursuant, to the Texas Enterprise Zone Act, Chapter 2303, Texas Government Code (Aet); providing tax incentives, designating a liaison for communication with interested parties, and nominating INVISTA S. r.l. to the Office of the Governor Economic Development & Tourism (EDT) through the Economic Development Bank (Bank) as an Enterprise Project (Project); containing an severab,ility clause; containing an Open Meetings clause; providing an effective date hereof. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas (City) desires to create the proper economic and social environment to induce the investment of private resources in productive business enterprises located in severely distressed areas of the city and to provide employment to residents of such area; and WHEREAS, the project or activity is not located in an area designated as an enterprise zone; and WHEREAS, PUTSLiant to the Texas Enterprise Zone Act (Act), Chapter 2303, Texas Goverrunent. Code, Subehapter F of the Act, INVISTA S.,i r.l. has applied to the City for designation as an enterprise project; and WHEREAS, the City finds that INVISTA S.i r.l. niects the criteria for tax relief and other incentives adopted by the City on the grounds that it will be located at the qualified business site, will create a higher level of ernploymient, economic, activity and stability; and WHEREAS, a duty advertised public bearing to consider this ordinance was held by the City Council on May 10, 2010; Now, THEREFORE BE, ITORDAINED BY THEY CITY COUNCU, OFTHE <.,']'['Y OF I..,,A PORTE, 'FVXASTHA:I`: Section 1: The City norninates, INVISTA S. r.1. for enterprise project status. Section 2: ]'he following local incentives, at the election of the City Council of the City of I..,a Porte goyefaing body, are or wilt may be made available to the i1orninated project or activity of the qualified business: a) The City may abate taxes on the increase in value of real property improvements and eligible personal property that locate in a designated enterprise zone for up to 4-0 5 years, to the extent eligible for tax abatement under state law and city ordinances. The level of abatement shall be based upon capital investment, and the extent to which the business receiving the abaternent creates Jobs for qualified employees, in accordance with the City of La Porte Tax Abatement Pohey Guidelines and Criteria, Chapter 66 of the Ia Porte Code of Ordinances, and with "qualified erriployee" being defined by the Act. b) I'lie City may, as allowed by law, provide business and industrial development services, including: 1) Grants to eligible companies through the city's 4�A and 4B Type 13 sales tax corporation; 2), Chapter 380 tax rebates for proJects which: significantly enhance the city's tax base; 3) Freeport exemption on property tax for employer's inventory that is shipped outside of Texas; 4) has established aTax Increment Reinvestment Zone; 5) provision of' publicly owned land for development purposes, including residential, commercial, or industrial development; 6) creation of special one -stop pemiitting, and problem resolution centers or ombudsmen; or 7) promotion and marketing services. c) The City may, as allowed by law, provide regulatory relief to businesses, including: 1) zoning changes or variances; 2) exemptions from unnecessary building code requirements, impact fees, or inspection fees; or 3) streamlined permitting, d) The City may, as allowed by law, provide enhanced municipal services to businesses, including: 1) improved police and fire protection; 2) institution of community crime prevention programs; or e) The City may, as allowed by law, provide improvements i:n community facilities, including: 1) capital improvements in water and sewer facilities; 2) road repair; or 3) creation or improvement of parks, The City may, as allowed by law, provide job training and employment services to businesses, including: 1) retraining programs;. 2) literacy and cmployment skills, programs; 3) vocational education; or 4) customized job training. Section 3: The enterprise zone areas within the City are reinvestment zones in accordance with the Texas Tax Code, Chapter 312, Section 312.203. Section 4: The City of La Porte City Council directs and designates Stacey Osborne as the City's, liaison to communicate and negotiate with the EDT through the Bank and enterprise praject(s) and to oversee zone activities and communications with qualified businesses and other entities in all enterprise zone or affected by an enterprise project.. Section, 5: 'The City finds that INVISTA S.A r.l. meets the criteria for designation as an enterprise project under Chapter 230,3, Subchapter F of the Texas Enterprise Zone Act on the following grounds: (a.) INVISTA S.i r.l. is a "qualified business" under Section 2303.40,2 of the Act since it will be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business at a qualified business site within: the governing body's jurisdiction, located outside of an enterprise Zone and at least thirty-five percent (35%) of the business' new employees will be residents of an enterprise zone or economically, disadvantaged individuals; and (b) There has been and will continue to be a high level of cooperation between public, private, and neighborhood entities in the area; and (c) The designation of MVISTA SAi r.l. as an enterprise project will contribute significantly to the achievement of the: plans of tile City for development and revitalization ofthe area. Section 6: The enterprise project shall take effect on the date of designation of the enterprise project by EDT and terminate on 6 1 15 June 1, 2015 (not less than one year, or more than five (5) years effifer the data oJ'designation). Section 7: Should any section or part of this ordinance be held unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, or the application to any person or circumstance for any reasons thereof ineffective or inapplicable, such unconstitutionality, illegality, invalidity, or ineffectiveness of such section or part shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate the remaining portions thereof, but as to such remaining portion or portions, the same shall be and remain in full force and effect and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 8. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a Sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting ofthe City Council is posted at a place convenient to the public at. the C�ity Hall of the city II)r the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by Chapter 55 1, Tx. Gov't Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section % This Ordinance shall be effective after its passage and approval. PASSE,D AND APPROVED this the . . ....... day of, 2010. CITY OF LA PORTE By: ArrEST: City Secretary APPROVE.D: Assistant City Attorney Mayor ORDINANCE No. An Ordinance of the City Council of rauthiorizing the City's participation, in the Texas Enterprise Zone Program pursuant to the Texas Enterprise Zone Act, Chapter 2303i, Te as Government Code; provid ing tax incentives, designating a liaison for communication with interested; parties, and: nom, inating INVISTA, S.6 r.l. to the; Office of the Golverni:or EconomicDevelopment & T• through w o Development • "" containing an severability• provid,ing an effective date hereof. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas (City) desires to create the proper economic and social environment to induce the investment of private resources in. productive business enterprises located in severely distressed areas of the city and to provide employment to residents of such area; and WHEREAS, the project or activity is not located in an area designated as an enterprise zone; arid. WHFREA, pursuant to the Texas Enterprise ,Zone Act "Act), Chapter 2303, Texas Government Code, Subchapter F of the Act, Il"+VIS Tyr S.A r..l. has applied to the City for designation as an enterprise project„ and WHEREAS, the City finds that INVISTA S.i r.l. meets the criteria for tax relief and other incentives adopted by the City on the grounds that it will be located at the qualified business site, will create a higher level of employment, economic activity and stability; and. WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing to consider this ordinance was held by the City Council on May 10,2010; Now,THEREFORE FEE I'r ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE crry OF LA PORT E, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City nominates INVISTA S,it r.l. for enterprise project. status. Section . The following local incentives, at the election of the City Council of the City of La Porte, are or may be made available to the nominated project or activity of the qualified business: a) The City may abate taxes on the increase in value of real property improvements and eligible personal property that locate in a designated enterprise zone for up to 5 years, to the extent eligible for tax abatement under state law and city ordinances. T"he level of abatement shall be based upon capital investment, and the extent to which the business receiving the abatement creates jobs for qualified employees, in accordance with the City of La Porte Tax Abatement Guidelines and Criteria, Chapter 66 of the La Porte Code of Ordinances, and with "qualified employee" being defined by the Act. b) The City rnay, as allowed by law, provide business and industrial development services, including: 1) Grants to eligible companies through the city's Type B sales tax corporation; 2) Chapter 380 tax rebates for projects which significantly enhance the city's tax base; 3) Freeport exemption on property tax for employer's inventory that is shipped outside of Texas; 4) has established a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone; 5) provision of publicly owned land for development purposes, including residential, cornmercial, or industrial development; 6) creation of special one -stop permitting and problem, resolution centers or ombudsmen; or 7) prornotion and marketing services. c) The City may, as, allowed by law, provide regulatory relief to; businesses, including: 1) zoning, changes or variances; 2) exemptions from unnecessary building code requirements,, impact fees, or inspection fees; or 3) streamlined permitting. d) The City may, as allowed by law, provide enhanced municipal services to businesses, including: 1) improved police and fire protection; 2) institution of community crime prevention programs; or e) The City may, as allowed by law, provide inaprovements in community facilities, including: 1) capital improvements in water and sewer facilities; 2) road repair; or 3) creation or improvement of parks. f) The City may, as allowed by law, provide Job training and employment services to businesses, including: 1) retraining programs;. 2) literacy and employment skills programs; 3) vocational education, or 4) customized job training. Section 3: The enterprise zone areas within the City are reinvestment zones in accordance with the Texas Tax Code, Chapter 312, Section 312.20:3. Section 4: The City of La Porte City Council directs and designates Stacey Osborne as the City's liaison to communicate and negotiate with the EDT through the Bank and enterprise project(s) and to oversee zone activities and communications with qualified businesses and other entities in an enterprise zone or affected by an enterprise project. Section 5: 'I"he City finds that INVISTA S. r.l. meets the criteria for designation as an enterprise project under Chapter 2303, Subchapter F of the Texas Enterprise Zone Act on the following grounds: (a.) INVISTA S. r.l. is a "qualified business" under Section 2303.402 of the Act since it will be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business at a qualified business site within the governing body's jurisdiction, located outside of an enterprise zone and at least thirty-five percent (35%) of the business' new employees will be residents of all enterprise zone or economically disadvantaged individuals; and (b.) There has been and will continue to be a high level of cooperation between public, private, and neighborhood entities in the area; and (c.) The designation of INVISTA S.A r.l. as an enterprise project will contribute significantly to the achievement of the plans of the City for development and revitalization of the area. Section 6: The enterprise project shall take effect on the date of designation of the enterprise project by EDT and terminate on June 1, 2015 (not less than one year, or more than five (5).years after the date of designation). Section 7: Should any section or part of this ordinance be held unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, or the application to any person or circumstance for any reasons thereof ineffective or inapplicable, such unconstitutionality, illegality, invalidity, or ineffectiveness of such section or part shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate the remaining portions thereof; but as to such remaining portion or portions, the same shall be and remain in fill] force and effect and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. Section S. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council is posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the city for the time required by law preceding this meeting,, as required by Chapter 55 1, Tx. Gov't Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as, required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be effective after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 201 CITY OF LA PORTE Mayor ATTEST: WIT!"Ar V'IWWVIZO�� City Secretary AI`Pr&!� Assistant City Attorney The purpose of the Texas Enterprise Zone Program is to encourage job creation and capital investment in economically distressed areas of Texas. The program, which was created as a result of the Texas Enterprise Zone Act (Act), Chapter 2303, Texas Government Code, uses a process to identify severely distressed areas of the state and provide state/local incentives to induce private investment in these areas. BOUT THIS DOCUMEN This document serves as a reference for enterprise projects seeking to obtain both the State Sales & Use Tax Refund and Franchise Tax Reduction offered through the Texas Enterprise Zone Program. It is preie red business practice to have Jobs et'Liked by Texas �; °oaaonii ° D velloprruae (Tx,D) hei'of'e as a:llaini is submitted Lo the Comptroller oi' fthllic Accounts (Comptroller). This vs,oulld re(uire submission oi'aa a°onnnnlleLe oh `gin'tik aLioan AJ)J)hN.aaLiMn as least 60...90 days lnn°iot' Lo the pnJecL tax claini deadline. CONTENTS OF GUIDE Section 1 Commonly Asked Questions .................................................... Section 2 Claim Process for Job Certification ......................................... Section 2a Claim Process for Job Certification (Subsequent Claims) ....... Section 3 Applying for Sales & Use Tax Refund .................................... Instructions for Filling out Application for Program Benefits Sample Documents 1 & 2...................................................... ENEFIT CYCLE .............................................. Pg. 2-4 .............................................. Pg. 5-6 .............................................. Pg. 7 .............................................. Pg. 8 ............................................. Pg. 9-10 .............................................. Pg. 11-12 State Sales & Use Tax Refund — An enterprise project may file a claim annually or semi-annually. Franchise Tax Benefit — The applicable reduction or credit is taken on the enterprise project's annual report filing for each year of the five-year designation period. Please contact the Comptroller for further information at 1-800-531-5441. Note: For further information on taxes, filing claims and the Comptroller's office in general, please visit their internet site @ http://www.window.state.tx.us/ CONTACT LIST For Job Certification Assistance Call: Texas Economic Development Texas Enterprise Zone Program (512) 936-0263 Yvette Henderson (512) 936-0274 Brenda Clear (512) 936-0047 Tad Curtis For State Sales And Use Tax Instructions Call: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Orlando Guerrero (512) 463-4332 or toll -free (800) 531-5441 x34549 For Franchise Tax Instructions Call: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Jerry Oxford (512) 463-4496 or toll -free (800) 531-5441 x34496 Texas Economic Development is an equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and services will be made available upon request to individuals with disabilities. What is an Enterprise Zone? An enterprise zone is a local option, and economic development tool that allows a community to partner with the State to offer a package of local and state tax and regulatory benefits to new or expanding businesses in economically distressed areas. More specifically, a zone is a geographic area nominated by a city or county or a combination of cities and/or counties through an application to TxED. The area must meet at least one of two possible primary distress criteria (high unemployment or population loss) and one of seven secondary distress criteria that are currently considered. The area must have a continuous boundary and be at least one square mile in size, but not larger than 10 square miles or 5% of the governing body's/bodies' jurisdiction (up to 20 square miles), whichever is larger. The designation period for a zone is seven years. What is an Enterprise Project? An enterprise project is a business that is nominated by an enterprise zone governing body and approved by TxED for state and local benefits. The business must commit to create or retain permanent jobs, make capital investment in the enterprise zone, fill at least 25% of its new jobs with individuals who are either economically disadvantaged or residents of an enterprise zone within the governing body (ies) jurisdiction, and maintain a level of employment from the date jobs are certified by TxED for at least three years. What State Incentives Are Available to Enterprise Projects? Projects are eligible for State Sales & Use Tax refunds and Franchise Tax reductions or credits. These benefits are based on job creation, and in some cases job retention, and capital investment for a period of five years. Investment made and jobs created 90 working days prior to the date of approval and during the designation period may be considered eligible for benefits. The State Sales and Use Taxes paid on machinery and equipment, building materials, labor for the rehabilitation of existing buildings, electricity and natural gas purchased for use in the enterprise zone and other eligible items may eligible for refund. The refund is based on $2,000 for each permanent job created or retained for projects approved prior to 9/1/01, and $5,000 for each permanent job created or retained during the five-year designation period for projects approved on or after 9/1/01. The number of jobs for which a refund maybe received is based upon commitments made in the project application. Each project is limited to a maximum refund of $1.25 million or $250,000 per year over the five- year period. The process involved for State Sales and Use Tax refund is two -fold and requires: 1) Certification of jobs created andlor retained by TxED. 2) Certification of sales & use tax paid on qualifying items by the Comptroller. The Franchise Tax reduction is taken on its annual report filing for each year of the five-year designation. The reduction is based on the amount of capital investment made by the project in the enterprise zone. The project's apportioned taxable capital may be reduced by 50% of the capital investment or the apportioned earned surplus income may be reduced by 5% of the capital investment made in the enterprise zone. The business must pay the highest liability. Projects designated on or after September 1, 2001 are entitled to establish certain franchise tax economic development credits. For more information about the jobs creation credit and capital investment credit, see Chapter 171, Subchapter P & Q of the Texas Tax Code. To determine potential franchise tax benefit under this section of the program, we would advise your tax department contact the Comptroller. The contact is Mr. Jerry Oxford, (512) 463-4642. What is a Qualified Business? A qualified business is a person, including a corporation or other entity that TxED, for purposes of state benefits under the Act, and a governing body, for purposes of local benefits, certifies to have met the following criteria: (A) the person is engaged in or has provided substantial commitment to initiate the active conduct of a trade or business in the zone; and (B) at least 25.0% of the business's new employees in the zone are residents of any zone within the governing body's or bodies' jurisdiction or economically disadvantaged individuals; and (C) a franchise or subsidiary of a new or existing business may be certified by the governing body of an enterprise zone as a qualified business if the franchise or subsidiary is located entirely in the zone and maintains separate books & records of the business activity conducted in the zone. What is the Definition of Economically Disadvantaged? An individual who: (A) was unemployed for at least three months before obtaining employment with a qualified business; or (B) receives public assistance benefits, such as welfare or food stamp payments, or a member of an employee's immediate family receiving Supplemental Security Income or Aid to Families with Dependent Children payments (Food Stamps must be received by the employee only, not a member of the employee's immediate family); or (C) has a physical or mental disability (a disability which constitutes or results in a substantial barrier to employment and can reasonably be expected to benefit in terms of employability from vocational rehabilitation services. NOTE: Individuals should be certified by an authorized agency or doctor); or (D) is homeless (lacks a fixed or regular nighttime residence or whose residence is a supervised public or private shelter providing temporary living accommodations); or (E) is a foster child (an individual on behalf of whom state or local government payments are made and for whom a court order removing the child from the custody of the parent and specifying a manager conservator exists); or (F) is on parole or entering the workplace after being confined in a unit or correctional facility of the institution division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice or the Texas Youth Commission; or (G) is an individual whose total family income meets the low income or moderate income limits developed under Section 8, United States Housing Act of 1937. Includes all income by employee, spouse, all dependents, and family members living with employee as of the employment date. What is a Qualified Employee? An employee that works at least 50% of his/her time for the qualified business in the enterprise zone. What is a New Permanent Job? A new position created over and above the company's current baseline, at the time of project designation, which provides a qualified employee of a qualified business with employment of at least 1,820 hours of work annually. Seasonal, temporary or part-time jobs are not considered to be new permanent jobs, and therefore are not eligible for benefit. What is a Retained Job? A position that existed with a qualified business prior to designation as an enterprise project that has provided employment to a qualified employee of at least 1,820 hours annually and is intended to be a position retained during the period the business is designated as an enterprise project. What is an Existing Job? A full-time position that was reported by the qualified business in the enterprise project application. These jobs do not qualify for benefit. The current number of existing jobs is used to determine the baseline level of employment at the time of project designation. New jobs, which are created 90 days prior to the date of approval and five years after approval date, qualify for benefit if the baseline jobs are maintained. Do Leased, Contract or Construction Employees Qualify for Benefit? No. All employees occupying the new or retained jobs must be under the direct and permanent employment of the enterprise project that received the enterprise project designation. What Expenditures Qualify for Benefit? All items must be sold to the enterprise project for use in the enterprise zone _D Equipment and machinery. (all machinery and equipment used to operate the business) a) includes office equipment, computers, hand tools, intra-plant transportation equipment. b) includes machinery and materials used in the repair or remodeling of tangible personal or real property. c) For projects designated on or after 9/1/01 and before 9/1/05 included in eligible items are tangible personal property purchased and consumed in the zone and taxable services (7� Building materials for use in remodeling, restoring, or building a new structure in the enterprise zone. Includes all structural steel, lumber, bricks, flooring, electrical system, cooling and heating systems, plumbing; concrete, asphalt & masonry. NOTE: Labor for new construction is not taxed in Texas and is not eligible for refund. C Labor for remodeling or rehabilitating a structure (effective after 9/1/95). # Electricity and natural gas purchased and consumed in the normal course of business. The state portion of the sales and use tax may be claimed but not the local portion unless that incentive is offered in the local area Note 1: State sales and use taxes paid on qualifying items must be clearly identified by use of a "separated contract" that specifies what portion of the payment is for taxes on labor to be eligible for refund. Note 2: State and local sales & use tax is not collected on the following items: 1. Machinery and equipment used in the manufacturing process. 2. Machinery and equipment exclusively used in the processing, packing, or marketing of agricultural products by the original producer at a location operated by the original producer exclusively for processing, packing, or marketing the producer's own products. 3. Machinery, tools and equipment used or consumed exclusively in the repair, remodeling, or maintenance of aircraft, aircraft engines, or aircraft component parts by or on behalf of a certified or licensed carrier of persons. 4. Electricity and natural gas consumed by companies that have been certified as predominantly a "manufacturer". _D Determine if hiring requirement has been met. Before filing a claim for certification, determine if the following hiring requirements have been met: a) at least 25% of the total new jobs created to date are filled with individuals that are either economically disadvantaged (ED) and/or enterprise zone residents (EZR). EXAMPLE: Of the 100 total new jobs created, 40 employees are ED/EZR (40 ) 100 b) projects using the retained job benefit, at least 25% of employee turnover must be either ED and/or EZR. EXAMPLE: Of the 100 retained jobs claimed, 8 jobs had turnover; therefore, at least 2 employees hired in the 8 turnover positions must be ED/EZR (2 ) 8 = 25%). c) for projects approved after 9/1/01, the hiring requirement that must be met is the hiring commitment made in the original application for which points were earned. d) employees occupying positions must have accumulated the minimum of 1,820 hours during a 12-month period. (4 Submit a completed Application for Prozram Benefits form to claim the total number of new jobs created and/or retained. The claim form must be signed by the authorized representative for the project as approved in the corporate resolution in the project application. If this is an initial (first time) job certification claim, no application fee is required. If this is a subsequent job certification claim, submit a non-refundable check in the amount of $500. The check must be made payable to Texas Economic Development, Enterprise Zone Program. C Submit supporting documentation to verify commitments that the new jobs created were filled by individuals who were economically disadvantaged and/or enterprise zone residents at the time of employment, as outlined in the application for which points were earned. The documentation submitted should reflect only existing employees reported during the current claim period. Do not send documentation for those employees that have been terminated. Also, do not send originals. Please maintain the originals in your permanent files. The documentation may include: a) Economically Disadvantaged: Submit verification by the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC). Enterprise projects may utilize the TWC for pre -employment screening to identify and refer qualified job applicants, including whether or not the applicant meets the economically disadvantaged provision; or Submit copies of the Post -Employment Employee Certification Form (page 12 of this document) or a similar form administered by the enterprise project. This form can be used to determine if the newly hired employees meet the criteria of an economically disadvantaged individual. This form must be distributed to all new employees occupying newly created job positions, on a confidential and voluntary basis. b) Residency: Submit verification by the local Enterprise Zone Liaison of employees who reside in the enterprise zone. To confirm/document if employees occupying newly created jobs are residents of an enterprise zone, federal empowerment zone, or enterprise community, governed by the same governing body where the project is located, submit a request to the zone liaison including a listing of each employee's name and home address. # Following TxED's review of the completed claim and supporting documentation, the claim representative may receive a findings letter that explains any outstanding issues pertaining to the position/job certification process. The findings letter will explain any deficiencies and provide the specific direction needed to complete the certification process. An attachment to the letter may be used to outline the specific positions/jobs that are "subject to verification" in addition to requesting information that may be deficient. ff verina.°ation is not Deceived by the time period stij)ulated in the kndings letter, mmiy the J)ositionsJohsthat -mu°m deemed m:g aiikmmN mNuu°ium u the initial revie�N, �m-iii he et'Lihied. The certified positions/jobs will remain subject to the 3-year active standing requirement. PLEASE NOTE: TxED has the right to obtain and review payroll data from the enterprise project for audit and review purposes. TxED will use professional judgment in determining when this additional step will be performed. Typically a payroll may be required when the business had existing employees at the time of project application. Finally, TxED will notify the enterprise project and the Comptroller of its findings and the number of jobs certified. NO'7'E; ['lease eiiism i-e flllialw .A l l., smmimimom.°tiurmd dmmm°mmuimmciirmrlalwimmiia is arlw:tam°Illmm°d if) rlwlllie Job ceiii°tificalimmiia claiiiimm, aiiad rIwlllmarlw flume dmmcmmui ciiflalwimmiia is iurm rlwallie saiiimie Nui-iiiimarlw as slmmmwiirm iiirm rlwlllie ^uaiaiimle dmmcmuaicialw:s. ll:" a claiiiimm is m.°eceiurm°d wirlwlimmmil 1, , stiplmmmui.°tiiag dmmcmuaicirmrlwsl:immurm, mmiu.° if rlwliie dmmcmmiiincirmrlwal:immurm is unolw: iiirm rlwlllie m°mmm. ii-ecl km.°ui ialw, flume claiiiimm will be ui'efimui°iiied, aiad a iiew stmlmuimmissimmurm will be ui�°egmmiui ed. 11 is iuimmimeiiarlwive rlwlllmal: all iiiiislwui°mmclw:im ias mmiia rlwlllie Applicalioia Clllmm^m°Illclisl be followed Io ui°edtice iiirmm°mmuimmlmlele m:mm,° iurmam°cmmm°ale stibiiaii1tal flllmarlw will ui°m stilrlw iurm ur°egmmm^sl s bin°miring m.°m°rlwmmui°iiiied liner ]1'x ^,ld wirlwlllmmml: ui°eview. The claim process for subsequent claims is a little different than for initial claims. Each position can only be certified once but must be maintained for a period of 3 years from the date it qualifies; therefore, updated data must be provided for previously certified positions as well as new positions when submitting spreadsheet for subsequent claims. Please use the following steps: _Q Using the same spreadsheet/listing that was previously submitted, identically formatted, update all positions with employee names, social security numbers, hours worked during the claim period, payroll data, dates of hire/termination (for the qualified position) and EZR/ED status. ➢ Previously certified positions must be updated to show that the position is being maintained and filled. Show any employee turnover that has occurred in these positions. ➢ Once previously submitted position data has been updated, add the new positions that have been created since the last claim was filed. It is important that the position numbers from the previous claim match the position numbers of this claim; the new positions will start with the next number in sequence. C'- The 25% hiring requirement is now calculated on all employees that are currently listed to include previously certified positions. Example: 25 positions were certified on the initial claim, the second claim has 25 more positions..... if all positions are filled then the 25% would be calculated using 50 total positions (50 x .25 = 12.5 positions would need to be ED/EZR, round down to 12 positions). C Include all supporting documentation for positions on updated spreadsheet/listing. NOTE: Once a position number has been assigned and the position considered for certification, the number should not be changed or used again. Example: The first claim has positions 91-25, the subsequent claim, while including previously certified positions 91-25 (with updated information) would continue with 926-50, the third claim likewise including previously certified positions 91-50 (with updated information) would be 951-75.....and so on. _D Comptroller of Public Accounts. Once the job certification process has been completed by TxED, certification of state sales taxes paid on qualifying items is performed by the Comptroller. Information on sales/use tax, the tax code, forms and the Comptroller's office can be found on the intereet at the following address/URL: http: //www.window.state.tx.us/ (4 Complete the Enterprise Proiect Claim for Refund of Texas State Sales and Use Tax form Submit the completed form to the Comptroller along with the Invoices and Contracts form. It is not necessary to submit copies of invoices with this claim, but submitting invoices may decrease processing time. However, backup documentation must be maintained on -site and is subject to audit by the Comptroller. It is not necessary to submit a copy of the sales tax claim to TxED. C Submit the sales tax claim to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. The sales tax claim may be sent to the Comptroller before, after, or at the same time the job certification claim documents are submitted to TxED. It is recommended that, if possible, you wait until jobs have been certified by TxED, as the Comptroller will not process the sales tax claim until they are notified that jobs have been certified. Note 1: The maximum refund amount that can be paid to an enterprise project is $250,000 per year, subject to 1) certification by TxED of new jobs created at the rate of $2,000 or $5,000 per job (depending on whether the project was approved before or after 9/1/01), and 2) the amount of sales and use taxes paid on qualifying items. Note 2: Enterprise projects that receive a refund of sales and use taxes must maintain the jobs associated with the refund for at least three years from the date the position qualifies for a refund. If the jobs are not maintained the Comptroller will assess that portion of the refund attributable to any such decrease in employment, including penalty and interest from the date of refund. Requests for refunds of state sales or use taxes must include certification by Texas Economic Development that the enterprise project is a qualified business under the terms of Section 2303.401 of the Texas Enterprise Zone Act, Texas Government Code. APPLICATION FOR PROGRAM BENEFITS CHECKLIST Submit checklist initialed to indicate documents are completed or attached. Indicate NA if issue is not applicable. SECTION 1: Zone and Project Information Zone Name and Number — Enter the name of the enterprise zone and the zone number. Project Name — Name of project as approved in the application (if an assumption of the company or a name change has occurred, official action must be taken before a job certification can occur). Project Number — Enter the enterprise project number. This number was sent with the initial packet designating your project, call our office if you do not have the number. Date Approved and Date Expires — Enter the date the project was approved and the date the project will expire. Job Certification Deadline and 90-Day Window — The job certification deadline is calculated as the end of the state fiscal year (8/31) after the first anniversary after the project expires. For example if the project expires 1/31/02, the first anniversary after the project expires is 1/31/03; therefore the job certification deadline is 8/31/03. For a first-time claim, you may include sales and use taxes paid and new employees hired no more than 90 working days prior to the date of designation through the end of the claim period (this date was included in the initial packet designating your project). Designated Project Name and Address — Name and address of qualified business site. Taxpayer or Vendor ID Number — Federal I.D. Number or Social Security Number if filing as an individual (must match approved project application), as well as the address attached to the number (parent company address, etc.). SECTION 2: Claim Type Claim Type — Annual Claim or Semi -Annual Claim; check the appropriate box. Claim Type —First claim for the project, or a subsequent claim; check the appropriate box. If this is a subsequent claim, include a non-refundable application fee in the amount of $500, made payable to Texas Economic Development Claim Period - Actual period covered with this claim, this may be any qualified 12-month period as supported by payroll. SECTION 3A: Job Position Information (First -Time Claim) NOTE: Full-time and Permanent Employees - All employees must be full-time (1820 hours or more annually), direct and permanent employees of the qualified business designated an enterprise project. Contract, leased, part-time or outsourced employees are not considered employees and do not count for job certification purposes. 1. Number of Jobs Allocated — Jobs allocated 110% of the number of jobs projected to be created and/or retained in the application up to the maximum allowed (625 for projects approved prior to 9/1/01, and 250 for projects approved after 9/l/01). This number was sent with the initial packet designating your project. 2. Total Number of Job Positions submitted for certification — The total qualifying number of job positions created and/or retained since project designation and being submitted for certification. When submitting a claim for both new and retained jobs, submit separate spreadsheets. 3. Total number of employees ED/EZR - Number of reported employees that are residents of any enterprise zone within the governing body(ies)' jurisdiction and/or that are economically disadvantaged. Employees that are both ED and EZR only count once. 4. Percent of Reported Employees ED/EZR —Calculate and enter the percentage (line 3 ) line 2). Projects using the retained job benefit, at least 25% of employee turnover must be either ED and/or EZR. 5. Total Payroll for all Positions Reported this Claim Period — Total dollar amount of payroll for all new employees hired no more than 90 working days prior to the date of designation through the end of this claim period. 6. Total Number of Employees located at all Texas facilities - Total jobs that are in Texas with the company that is designated an enterprise project. 7. Total Employees at the Designated Project Facility — The total number of employees located at the designated project facility only. 8. Allocation Remaining — Calculate the allocation remaining by subtracting the number of jobs eligible for certification from the number of jobs originally allocated at the time of approval. SECTION 3B: Job Position Information (Subsequent Claim) NOTE: Full-time and Permanent Employees - All employees must be full-time (1820 hours or more annually), direct and permanent employees of the qualified business designated an enterprise project. Contract, leased, part-time or outsourced employees are not considered employees and do not count for job certification purposes. 1. Number of Jobs Allocated — Jobs allocated 110% of the number of jobs projected to be created and/or retained in the application up to the maximum allowed (625 for projects approved prior to 9/l/01, and 250 for projects approved after 9/l/01). This number was sent with the initial packet designating your project. 2. Total Number of Job Positions Reported — Total number of new and previously certified job positions created and/or retained by the project since the 90-day window date. When submitting a claim for both new and retained jobs, submit separate spreadsheets. 3. Total Number of Job Positions Previously Certified. 4. Total Number of Job Positions Submitted for Certification this Claim — Subtract line 3 from line 2. 5. Total number of employees ED/EZR - Number of reported employees that are residents of any enterprise zone within the governing body(ies)' jurisdiction and/or that are economically disadvantaged. Employees that are both ED and EZR only count once. 6. Percent of Reported Employees ED/EZR — Calculate and enter the percentage (line 5 ) line 2). Projects using the retained job benefit, at least 25% of employee turnover must be either ED and/or EZR. 7. Total Payroll for all Positions Reported this Claim Period — Total dollar amount of payroll for all new employees hired no more than 90 working days prior to the date of designation through the end of this claim period. 8. Total Number of Employees located at all Texas facilities - Total jobs that are in Texas with the company that is designated an enterprise project. 9. Total employees at the designated project facility — The total number of employees located at the designated project facility only. 10.Allocation Remaining — Calculate the allocation remaining by subtracting the number of jobs eligible for certification (and previously certified) from the number of jobs originally allocated at the time of approval. SECTION 4: Required Backup Documents Verification of Zone Resident Status — This verification must be from the enterprise zone liaison on governing body letterhead. Verification of Economically Disadvantaged Status — This verification must either be TWC pre-screening documentation or the post -employment forms filled out by the employee (see sample document 1). Only submit forms for employees that qualify as economically disadvantaged. Qualified Business Re -certification forms Up -To -Date — If you are not sure whether this requirement has been met, call our office. Documentation for "Contribution to Community" — Submit written documentation of specific contribution(s) made as outlined in the original enterprise project application. This requirement applies to all projects approved after 9/l/01, and is a result of monitoring language required by statute. Power of Attorney — This attachment is only required if the claim is to be submitted by an outside consultant or independent party. SECTION 5: Certification of Application Certification/Signatures — This section must be completed and signed by the person that is designated as the Primary Business Representative on the original project application. SECTION 6: List of Jobs for Benefit (spreadsheet — sample document 2) Job Number — A job position number is required for each new job created. Each job position is to be identified by a number (i.e. 1, 2, 3, in sequential order, or 1 a, lb, 2a, 2b, etc. if more than one employee occupied a position due to turnover during the claim period). If a position is occupied by two employees for a short period of time (if an employee quits, and the new person starts before the "old" employee leaves), only count the hours for one employee and note which employee's hours are counted. The order continues between claim years. Position Title — The job position title. Employee Social Security Number/ID No. - The social security number of each new employee contributing to the cumulative work hours of a new job position. A permanent I.D. numbering system may be used in lieu of the SS# when the following criteria is met: 1] A statement from the business that it is not agreeable to providing social security information about their employees: and 2] A completed Job Certification -Numbering Affidavit. Employee Name — The name of the employee. All employees contributing hours to the new job position must be listed. Annual Payroll — The annual payroll paid for this position during the 12-month claim period. Number of Hours Worked — The total number of hours worked by each employee for each new job position during the claim period. Dates of Employment — The beginning and ending dates of each employee in the applicable job position. If employee was transferred to another position within the company then show date of transfer and show employee's name in both the old and new position. EZ Resident — Signify if the employee was an enterprise zone resident in any enterprise zone within the jurisdiction of the project applicant governing body(ies) (evidence must be provided by separate record verified by the enterprise zone liaison). Economically Disadvantaged — Signify if the employee was economically disadvantaged in accordance with the Enterprise Zone Act, Chapter 2303.401, Section (c) (evidence must be maintained by employer by separate record). See Page 3, Commonly Asked Questions section for a more detailed definition of economically disadvantaged. Only submit forms for employees that qualify as economically disadvantaged. Page Number — Fill out page number of current page and total pages used. SAMPLE DOCUMENT 1 POST -EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYEE CERTIFICATION The purpose of this survey is to obtain information from you as an employee of ABC Co m an , which is located in the Ci1y of Bluebonnet Enterprise Zone. Texas Economic Development would like for us to report the number of jobs we have created and the economic characteristics of our employees. Completion of this questionnaire is voluntary. Responses will be held confidential. Employee Name Lindsey Sellsmith Social Security No. 444 - 44 - 4444 Address, City, Zip 1234 Austin Trail, Bluebonnet, TX 77777 Employment Date 10/30/97 Please place a check mark(s) to the left of any statement that applies to you. XX I was unemployed for more than 90 days prior to being employed with ABC Com an I was receiving public assistance benefits prior to being employed by such as welfare, Women Infants and Children (WIC), or food stamp payments; or a member of my immediate family receives SSI (Supplemental Security Income) or TANF payments (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families). Food Stamps must be received by you, not a member of your immediate family). I have a disability. Individuals should be certified by an authorized agency or doctor. I am homeless, or a foster child (on behalf of whom the government pays benefit), or on parole or entering the workplace after being confined to a correctional facility. _XX_I am a member of a family whose total family income, before I was hired, was at or below the level indicated as marked below. Instructions: (1) Place a check mark on the line next to the number of members in your immediate family. Include yourself, your spouse, all dependents, and family members living with you as of your employment date. (2) Add together all income received by individuals in your immediate family for the previous twelve months, and circle the word below if your combined income was actually BELOW the income limit for the number of family members for Travis County(s). I have been laid off or terminated from my employment by a defense contractor, defense related agency or company. Please list name of the agency or company and date of termination: XX One Person Family, total income was elo $ $14.400 Two Person Family, total income was below $ Three Person Family, total income was below $ Four Person Family, total income was below $ Five Person Family, total income was below $ Six Person Family, total income was below $ Seven Person Family, total income was below $ Eight Person Family, total income was below $ I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and understand that completion of this form is voluntary. Lindsey Sellsmith Employee Signature Date 10/30/97 SAMPLE DOCUMENT 2 LIST OF JOBS FOR BENEFIT ABC Company, Inc. Project Approved: 10/23/98 / 90-Day Window: 6/16/98 Period of Claim: January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 ABC Company Project No. EP9999999 114 Oak Drive Bluebonnet, Texas 77777 Hours Payroll Worked Date Hired to During During Position / Job Position Social Security Employee Claim Claim Date Left No. Title Number Name Period Period Position EZ Econ. Resi- Disad- dent vantagec PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED JOBS (updated): 001 Division Director ###-##-#### Dennis E. Director $68,987 2,318 09/01/98 to Present N N 002 Office Manager ###-##-#### Mary Worker $27,208 2,056 09/15/98 to Present N N 003 Sales Manager ###-##-#### Delores Incharge -- -- 09/15/98 to 06/30/99 003A ###-##-#### Crystal Topseller $29,695 2,677 07/01/99 to Present N N 004 Sales Rep. ###-##-#### Lindsey Sellsmith $45,083 2,020 10/30/98 to Present N Y 005 Printer ###-##-#### Adam Typeset -- -- 01/15/98 to 09/20/99 005A ###-##-#### Marge Preston $23,496 2,155 09/20/99 to Present Y N NEW JOBS THIS CLAIM: 006 Sales Rep. ###-##-#### Ben Pressure $42,990 1,980 09/20/98 to 11/31/00 006A ###-##-#### Mike Ubuyitt $3,582 160 12/02/00 to Present Y N Position 006 TOTAL 2,140 007 Print Shop Mgr. ###-##-#### Adam Typeset $32,450 2,509 09/20/99 to Present N N 008 Printer ###-##-#### Samuel Rotary $6,859 658 08/15/98 to 01/30/00 008A ###-##-#### Luke Printer $14,190 1,227 02/10/00 to Present N N Position 008 TOTAL 1,885 009 Janitor ###-##-#### Mack Fixit $1,200 160 12/20/98 to 01/26/00 009A ###-##-#### George Washwell $13,650 *1,820 01/15/00 to Present N Y Position 009 TOTAL 1,980 010 Receptionist ###-##-#### Stephanie Greeter $18,275 2,080 09/01/98 to Present Y N 011 Secretary ###-##-#### Jennifer Files $22,438 1,945 02/15/99 to Present N N 012 Maintenance ###-##-#### Mack Fixit $25,587 2,080 01/26/00 to Present N N Total Jobs Created: 12 Total Payroll: $375,690 Total Enterprise Zone Residents and/or Economically Disadvantaged: 5 (41%) Vacant Positions: 0 TOTAL # OF JOBS ON THIS PAGE 12 PAGE # 1 of 1 TOTAL # OF JOBS ON THIS CLAIM 7 *George Washwell was hired to replace Mack Fixit; however, George began working I I days before Mack left the position for training purposes. Only George's hours were counted during the overlap period. NOTE 1: When calculating the 25% requirement, EZR and ED are only counted once for each employee currently in a position. Vacant positions or employees that have already terminated are not included in the 25% calculation. NOTE 2: Adam Typeset originally held position number 005. Adam then moved to position number 007. He is still listed under position number 005 because he held the position, but no hours are calculated for him because he did not hold the position during the claim period. Conversely, Mack Fixit originally held position 009, he then moved to position 012. He accumulated hours in both positions during the claim period, so hours are listed for him for both positions. NOTE 3: When submitting a subsequent claim, the previous spreadsheet / "List of Jobs for Benefit" must be updated to show that the previously certified positions are being maintained. Once a position has been certified it must be maintained or remain filled for a period of 3-years. Submittal of any new or subsequent claim period "List of Jobs for Benefit" spreadsheet may be done electronically in MS -Excel format with the Application for Program Benefits on a diskette. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: 10/08/12 Requested By: Kenith Adeox Department: Report: X Resolution: Ordinance: Exhibits: Draft Agreement with ICAC Exhibits: Budget Source of Funds: Account Number: Amount Budgeted: Amount Requested: Budgeted Item: YES NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The Police Department has a long-standing working relationship with the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force (ICAO). ICAC's primary focus is to maintain region -wide responsibility for the detection, apprehension, and prosecution of persons found to be accessing or trading child pornography within an eight County area. LPPD Detective Nathan Gates is currently assigned full-time to the task force, which, until recently, was coordinated by the Pasadena Independent School District. The task force is primarily funded through a federal grant, which had reimbursed 100% of the costs associated with Detective Gates' salary, benefits, training, transportation, and computer forensic equipment. As of the 2012/1013 fiscal year, the ICAC grant is being reassigned to the Houston Police Department (HPD) and HPD is requesting that Detective Gates continue to be detailed to the ICAC Task Force full-time as one of the group's two trained forensic examiners. Detective Gates will work out of the U.S. Secret Service Office located in Downtown Houston. Available federal ICAC grant funds have decreased for the 2012/2013 fiscal year and the new ICAC grant would cover reimbursements of only $63,000 to cover the costs of the involved detective's annual salary and benefits, which is approximately 70% of the detective's current annual salary and benefit costs. The City of La Porte is being asked to fund the remaining 30% of the detective's salary and benefits, which would be approximately $29,000. 100% of the involved detectives total annual salary and benefits were included in the Police Department's 2012-2013 budget. In addition to the above reimbursements, the ICAC Grant would provide the assigned detective with required specialized training, a work space, all required computer forensic equipment, and a vehicle, including associated fuel, maintenance and insurance costs. The initial agreement would be for a term of 1 year, with the intent of extending the agreement on an annual basis, based on available funding, for a maximum of four (4) years. Detective Gates would also continue to be available to provide the La Porte Police Department with assistance relating to other types of computer forensic needs and respond to emergency incidents (i.e. hurricanes) within the City when deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. Costs- Benefits Should the decision be made to no longer allow Detective Gates to work with the ICAC Taskforce, Detective Gates would return to his previous assignment as a general criminal investigator within the Police Department's CID Section. Since he would no longer have the access to an equipped computer lab, however, the Police Department would no longer have direct access to these much needed forensic capabilities. Setting up an on -site computer forensics lab within the City of La Porte would cost approximately $60,000, not including estimated annual maintenance and training costs of between $5,000 and $10,000. Without direct access to a computer forensics lab, the Police Department would have to use available County or State forensics services, which would greatly increase the time it currently takes the Police Department to obtain forensic evidence from computers, cell phones, and IPADs, which is now commonly required in a wide variety of criminal investigations. Currently, Detective Gates responds 3 to 4 times per month to call -outs for the La Porte Police Department relating to his specialized computer skills and expertise. These incidents include the special collection and preservation procedures involving sensitive electronic and computerized evidence from various sources. If allowed to remain with the ICAC Task Force, Detective Gates would continue to be available to perform these services for the Police Department. Staff is recommending that City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with the City of Houston Police Department to assign a detective to the ICAC Task Force under the above described conditions. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action of authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with the City of Houston Police Department to assign a detective to the ICAC Task Force for an initial term of 1 year, with options for extending the agreement on an annual basis, based on available funding, for a maximum of four (4) years. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program: Houston Metropolitan Area STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF HARRIS § This Interlocal Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement", is entered into by and between the City of Houston, a Home Rule City of the State of Texas, situated in Harris County, Texas, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, acting by and through its governing body, the City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and The City of La Porte Texas, , a body corporate and politic, acting by and through its City Council, and acting for the La Porte Police Department hereinafter referred to as the "LPD", pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City, through the Houston Police Department, hereinafter referred to as the "HPD", has applied for a grant with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), hereinafter referred to as the "OJJDP", for funding in the amount of $349,719 and entitled, "HOUSTON METRO INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN TASK FORCE", hereinafter referred to as the "ICAO". WHEREAS, the City, has agreed to contribute a total of $63,000 in reimbursement funds for a portion of the salary and benefits for one Detective (70% not exceeding $63,000 a year) The LPD has agreed to contribute the remaining 30% of the salary and benefits for the Detective (based on the hours and benefits listed in Exhibit "A", of said Agreement): WHEREAS, the target geographic area of such Grant program is the Houston Metropolitan Area, which includes incorporated as well as unincorporated areas of Harris County, Texas; and all areas of Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Liberty, Montgomery, and Waller Counties. WHEREAS, the Grant funds, in part, will be expended to pay the salary, fringe benefits, overtime, retirement/pension, in -state travel, insurance costs for a LPD Detective (1), hereinafter referred to as "Detective" to work with the City and other law enforcement officials to provide a link to the current cases of internet crimes against children and to assist in investigations connected with Grant program enforcement with jurisdictional issues: and, WHEREAS, the City and the LPD believe it is in their best interests to enter into this Agreement, to carry out the Grant program: and, WHEREAS, the City and the LPD agree to abide by all pertinent federal, state and local laws and regulations. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I PURPOSE 1.01 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for services of an Detective to work with the City and Harris County law enforcement officials to assist in the apprehension and prosecution of child exploitation, and serve as a liaison between same and other Detectives and law enforcement agencies that become involved in on going investigations as a result of the Grant program enforcement efforts. ARTICLE II TERM 2.01 The term of this Agreement is to commence on October 1, 2012, provided grant funds are available and terminate on the Grant expiration date, or on the termination date of any extension thereof granted by the Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Programs, hereinafter referred to as the "OJJDP", or October 1, 2013, whichever is later. In the event "OJJDP" Grant funding is available for the purpose of this Agreement after the expiration date the HPD Police Chief ("Chief') is authorized to extend this Agreement for one year at a time for up to four additional years. 2.02 The City and LPD acknowledge that the City must apply each year for a continuation of this Grant and that the Grant can be discontinued at any time by the OJJDP. Should the Grant be terminated or not renewed by the OJJDP for any reason, the City and the LPD agree to terminate this Agreement, on the date the Grant is terminated by the OJJDP. 2.03 Either party may terminate this Agreement by serving 30 days prior written notice of termination on the other party. ARTICLE III CONSIDERATION 3.01 The LPD will be paid on the basis of itemized monthly invoices submitted by the LPD and approved by the City showing the actual services performed and the attendant fee. The City shall make payment to the LPD within thirty (30) days of the receipt by the City of such invoices. If any items in any invoices submitted by the LPD are disputed by the City for any reason, including lack of supporting documentation, the City shall temporarily delete the disputed item and pay the remaining amount of the invoice. The City shall promptly notify the LPD of the dispute and request clarification and/or remedial action. After any dispute shall have been settled, the LPD shall include the disputed amount on a subsequent regularly scheduled invoice or on a special invoice for the disputed item only. The decision of the City regarding all disputes involving LPD invoices shall be final. 3.02 The City and the LPD acknowledge that during the term of this Agreement the amounts provided in Exhibit "A" may change as the City's application for renewal of Grant funding in the future years is reviewed by the OJJDP. It is further understood and agreed that any application for additional Grant funds over and above those amounts shown in Exhibit "A", shall first be approved by the City and the LPD and will be in accordance with the effective GRANT APPLICATION AND ADMINISTRATION GUIDELINES, of the OJJDP. ARTICLE IV SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.01 The LPD agrees that the Detective will perform those services provided in Exhibit `B", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all intents and purposes. 4.02 The LPD warrants that: (a) Services performed by the Detective assigned by the LPD to the Grant program and any property acquired for his use under this or any prior agreement between the City and the LPD pertaining to the Grant, hereinafter referred to as the "Property" are directly and exclusively devoted to the Grant program and that the amounts paid for personnel expenses are not in excess of the LPD's actual cost of same. (b) The Detective is not receiving dual compensation from the LPD and the City for the same services performed under the terms of this Agreement. (c) It will cooperate with the OJJDP, its agents, representatives, and employees, and any other State of Texas agency in regards to any audit, investigation or inquiry concerning the Grant. (d) The Detective assigned to work with City of Houston and Harris County law enforcement officers shall at all times, remain a LPD employee. Such Detective shall be subject to all LPD rules, regulations and procedures applicable. Such Detective shall be subject to LPD orders and training. (e) Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute an exception from, waiver of or other basis upon which the Detective is permitted to fail to, fully and promptly comply with all LPD rules, regulations, procedures and other operating policies. 4.03 The LPD agrees to comply with the OJJDP's rules, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements and OJP's Grants Management System (GMS), provided in "Exhibit C", as they relate to the Agreement and use of Federal Funds. ARTICLE V OWNERSHIP OF EQUIPMENT 5.01 Upon termination of this Agreement, ownership of equipment, hardware, and other non - expendable items will revert to the City of Houston Police Department, subject to the approval of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). ARTICLE VI INFORMATION/DATA 6.01 The LPD shall keep all materials to be prepared hereunder and all City data it receives in strictest confidence excluding those documents and records filed in the Courts. The LPD shall not divulge such information except as approved in writing by the City or as otherwise required by law. 6.02 The LPD, except as otherwise required by law, shall make no announcement or release of information concerning this Agreement until such release has been submitted to and approved in writing by the City and the OJJDP. When issuing statements, press releases, producing printed materials, audio visuals and other documents describing or related to the Grant program, such material shall clearly state that funding was provided by the City of Houston Police Department through a Grant from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Any such publicity shall be in a form approved by the OJJDP, the City and in accordance with State law. 6.03 The City shall have the right to perform, or cause to be performed, (1) audits of the books and records of the LPD pertaining to the LPD's performance under this Agreement, and (2) inspections of all places where work is undertaken in connection with this Agreement. The LPD shall be required to keep such books and records available for such purpose for at least four (4) years after the ceasing of its performance under this Agreement and to insure the availability, usability and safety of such records. The location of such records shall be disclosed to the City upon request. The location of such records shall not affect the time for bringing a cause of action, nor the applicable statute of limitations. 6.04 The LPD agrees to make all data, reports, records, books, paper, documents and all other information in any form, electronically produced or otherwise, that are prepared, collected or assembled for and during performance of this Agreement, concerning, derived from or as a result of the Grant, available to the City and the City Controller, through any authorized representative, within a reasonable time upon request. ARTICLE VII INSURANCE AND LIABILITY 7.01 The City and the LPD are both governed by the Texas Tort Claims Act, Chapter 101.001 et seq., as amended, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Ann., which sets forth certain limitations and restrictions on the types of liability and the types of insurance coverage that can be required of the City and the LPD. Each party to this Agreement warrants and represents that it is insured under a commercial insurance policy or self -insured for all claims falling within the Texas Tort Claims Act. 7.02 Each party to this Agreement agrees that it shall have no liability whatsoever for the actions or omissions of an individual employed by another party, regardless of where the individual's actions occurred. Each party is solely responsible for the actions and/or omissions of its employees and officers, to the extent permitted by Texas Law. ARTICLE VIII COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY LAWS 8.01 To the extent required by law, the LPD shall comply with all applicable laws, standards, orders and regulations regarding equal employment which are applicable to the LPD's performance of this Agreement, including Rules of Practice for Administrative Proceeding to Enforce Equal Opportunity under Executive Order No. 11246, title 41, subtitle B, Chapter 60, part 60-30, which are incorporated herein by reference. ARTICLE IX AMENDMENTS 9.01 This Agreement may be amended by the mutual agreement of the parties hereto in writing to be attached to and incorporated into this Agreement. ARTICLE X LEGAL CONSTRUCTIONS 10.01 In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. ARTICLE XI ENTIRE AGREEMENT 11.01 This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and no other agreement, statement, or promise relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, which is not contained herein, shall be valid or binding. ARTICLE XII T 7 A RTT TTV 12.01 Each party to this agreement shall be responsible for its own acts of negligence. Where any injury or property damage results from the joint or concurring negligence of the parties, liability, if any, shall be shared by each party on the basis of comparative responsibility in accordance with the applicable laws of the State of Texas, subject to all defenses, is including governmental immunity. These provisions are solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and not for the benefit of any person or entity not a party to this agreement; nor shall any provisions in this agreement be deemed a waiver of any defenses available by law. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE ORIGINALS, EACH OF WHICH SHALL HAVE THE FULL FORCE AND EFFECT OF AN ORIGINAL, ON THE COUNTERSIGNATURE DATE. CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS ATTEST/SEAL: Anna Russell, City Secretary APPROVED: Charles A. McClelland, Jr. Houston Police Chief APPROVED AS TO FORM: Senior AssistantCity Attorney APPROVED: Annise D. Parker, Mayor COUNTERSIGNED BY: Ronald Green, City Controller DATE COUNTERSIGNED: By City Controller Date LA PORTE POLICE DEPARTMENT APPROVED: Corby Alexander, City Manager Date Kenith Adcox, Police Chief Date EXHIBIT "A" LA PORTE POLICE DEPARTMENT Detective/Investigator SALARY $2,576.92 x 26 $67,000.00 FRINGE BENEFITS FICA 6.2 x $67,000.00 $4,154.00 RETIREMENT 10.83 x $67,000.00 $7,256.00 WC/U 9.0 x $67,000.00 $6,030.00 INSURANCE 10.79 x $67,000.00 $7,229.30 Total Benefits $24,669.30 Total Salary + Benefits $91,669.30 Funded by HPD/Grant (70% not to exceed $63,000.00) Funded by LPD (30%+ remainder of salary/benefits) $63,000.00 $28,669.30 Estimated cost for per diem expenses incurred away from duty station to Investigator assigned to grant position, to be paid in accordance with the La Porte Police Department policy and procedure. Total HPD/Grant Contractual Expenses $ 63,000.00 EXHIBIT `B" Scope of Services LA PORTE POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE (1) This LPD Detective will work with the members of this grant serving as a liaison between members of this unit, LA PORTE POLICE DEPARTMENT and other local, state and federal law enforcement agencies. This Detective will actively participate in investigations conducted by members of this grant that overlap local law enforcement's jurisdictional lines in the State of Texas. This Detective will assist local law enforcement officers in investigating child exploitation crimes that involve the use of the internet. EXHIBIT "C" ASSURANCES A Grantee and the Applicant hereby makes and certifies that as grantee, it and any subgrantee shall comply with the following conditions: 1. A grantee and subgrantee must comply DOJ/OJJDP grant rules and UGMS. 2. A grantee and subgrantee must comply with Texas Government Code, Chapter 573, by ensuring that no officer, employee, or member of the applicant's governing body or of the applicant's contractor shall vote or confirm the employment of any persons related within the second degree of affinity or the third degree of consanguinity to any member of the governing body or to any other officer or employee authorized to employ or supervise such person. This prohibition shall not prohibit the employment of a person who shall have been continuously employed for a period of two years, or such period stipulated by local law, prior to the election or appointment of the officer, employee, or governing body member related to such person in the prohibited degree. 3. A grantee and subgrantee must insure that all information collected, assemble or maintained by the applicant relative to a project will be available to the public during normal business hours in compliance with Texas Government Code, Chapter 552, unless otherwise expressly prohibited by law. 4. A grantee and subgrantee must comply with Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, which requires all regular, special or called meeting of governmental bodies be open to the public, except as otherwise provided by law. 5. A grantee and subgrantee must comply with Section 231.006, Texas Family Code, which prohibits payments to a person who is in arrears on child support payments. 6. No health and human services agency or public safety or law enforcement agency may contact with or issue a license, certificate or permit to the owner, operator or administrator of a facility if the license, permit or certificate has been revoked by another health and human services agency or public safety or law enforcement agency. 7. A grantee and subgrantee that is a law enforcement agency regulated by Texas Government Code, Chapter 415, must be in compliance with all rules adopted by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education pursuant to Chapter 415, Texas Government Code or must provide the grantor agency with a certification from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education that the agency is in process of achieving compliance with such rules. 8. When incorporated into a grant award or contract, these standard assurances contained in the application package become terms or conditions for receipt of grant funds. Administering state agencies and local subrecipients shall maintain an appropriate contact administration system to insure that all terms, conditions, and specifications are met. 9. A grantee and subgrantee must comply with the Texas Family Code, Section 261.101 which requires reporting of all suspected cases of child abuse to local law enforcement authorities and to the Texas Department of Child Protective and Regulatory Services. Grantees and subgrantees shall also ensure that all program personnel are properly trained and aware of this requirement. 10. Grantees and subgrantees will comply with all federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps and the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to the nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (I) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and 6) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statue(s) which may apply to the application. 11. Grantees and subgrantees will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276c and 18 U.S.C. §§ 874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327-333), regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction sub -agreements. 12. Grantees and subgrantees will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of federal participation in purchases. 13. Grantees and subgrantees will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Political Activity Act (5 U.S.C. § 7321-29) which limit the political activity of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. 14. Grantees and subgrantees will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, as applicable. 15. Grantees and subgrantees will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of the project are not listed on the Environmental Protections Agency's (EPA) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under consideration for listing by the EPA. (EO11738) 16. Grantees and subgrantees will comply with Article IX, Section 5 of the state appropriations act which prohibit the use of state funds to influence the outcome of any election or the passage or defeat of any legislative measure. HOUSTON INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN SPECIAL CONDITION ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION I certify that the programs proposed in this application meet all the requirements of the Texas Houston Internet Crimes Against Children Program, that all the information presented is correct, and that the applicant will comply with the rules of the Houston Internet Crimes Against Children and all other applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and guidelines. By appropriate language incorporated in each grant, sub -grant, or other document under which funds are to be disbursed, the undersigned shall assure that the foregoing assurances above apply to all recipients of assistance. LPD Authorized Official Date HOUSTON INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN SPECIAL CONDITION ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION I certify that the programs proposed in this application meet all the requirements of the Texas Houston Internet Crimes Against Children Program, that all the information presented is correct, and that the applicant will comply with the rules of the Houston Internet Crimes Against Children and all other applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and guidelines. By appropriate language incorporated in each grant, subgrant, or other document under which funds are to be disbursed, the undersigned shall assure that the foregoing assurances above apply to all recipients of assistance. Annise D. Parker, Mayor Date City of Houston REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: October 8, 2012 Requested By: Katherine Anrler%on Department: Human Resources Report: Resolution: Ordinance: Exhibits: Rate Comparison Exhibits: Budget Source of Funds: n/a Account Number: n/a Amount Budgeted: n/a Amount Requested: nia Budgeted Item: YES x NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The Dental and Vision carriers two year rate guarantee expired and a Request for Proposal was developed. These benefits are 100% paid for by the employees with no subsidy from City funds. The proposals were reviewed with the City's consultant McGriff, Siebels & Williams and the top three proposals for dental and vision were identified based on cost, provider network, and benefits. Each of the top three vendors for each benefit was then asked for the final and best offer. After the review, Human Resources is recommending selecting Met Life for Dental and the incumbent Block Vision for Vision. Dental As was discussed during the budget workshop, staff was forecasting a significant increase in the dental plan for two reasons. First, the claims were exceeding the premiums. In fact, the incumbent carrier chose not to respond to the RFP. Second, the current contract included an error in pricing that the company did honor but that resulted in unusually favorable pricing for employees. This favorable pricing structure was not likely to continue into a separate contract. Additionally, staff wanted to go back to the options of a dental PPO and dental HMO. The "MAC" plan offered by the incumbent was NOT a true HMO and had caused significant issues for the employees. The top three vendors all had average increases of 20%. Met Life is recommended for the following reasons: • Increased annual benefit from $1,000 to $1,250 • Strong network of providers • Additional coverage for implants and porcelain crowns • 2 year rates with 7% cap on second year Vision Upon review of the top three vendors, staff is recommending that the City continue with Block Vision, the incumbent carrier, for the following reasons: • Premium decrease of 1% with added benefits of: o Progressive lenses with co -pay o Polycarbonate as standard for adult and children o Scratch resistant coating with co -pay o 4 year rate guaranty In conclusion, staff is recommending approval to award the bid to Met Life for dental and Block Vision for vision. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action awarding RFP for dental and vision insurance benefits to Met Life for dental insurance and Block Vision for vision insurance. Approved for City Council Aeenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date N c-1 O N C L O U M J a z W a QJ M :~ r-I J O y N O a a N o 0 0 q0 Ln Ln Ln �6 �6 �o S N N N U 0 r" 00 rn cm Ln s o o c�i +' C N Rt r- O a) o 0 0 q0 Rt O Ol 0 (C6 N 00 ri s � U >- r- 06 � s rn ri r,i C N O 00 N 00 ri Cl M �o ri r- s 4, ri M Ln C O ri 00 Ol Ln l0 ri Ol Ln M S cI N C O c-I N a) a) a) a) a) a) O O O Q Q Q E E E Lu Lu Lu a)00 0 tw rn rn r- O s ��0 N v �:, Ln O 00 O s N m 4� C cI cI cO C O 00 r_ to M to �:- to ri to N .�n s rI cI C N v O Z _O m O a) a) a) a) a) a) O O O Q Q Q E E E Lu Lu Lu REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: October 08, 2012 Requested By: D. Wilmore Department: Planning Report: X Resolution: Ordinance: Exhibits: List of Dangerous Buildings Exhibits: Map of Locations Exhibits: Dangerous Building Inspection Reports Exhibits Budget Source of Funds: General Fund Account Number: 001-9092-524-6021 Amount Budgeted: %75,000 Amount Requested: Budgeted Item: YES NO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The Dangerous Building Inspection Board, as established by Sect. 82-472 of the City's Code of Ordinances, is composed of the Building Official (Debbie Wilmore), the Fire Chief (Mike Boaze) and the Fire Marshal (Clif Meekins). The Board initially identified eighteen (18) substandard structures; however, five (5) structures were demolished by the owners and need no action by City Council. In accordance with Sect. 82-473 of the City's Code of Ordinances, the Board has deemed the remaining thirteen (13) structures "a public nuisance and hazard". Whenever the Board determines violations under this section exist, the building or structure is considered "dangerous or substandard". As of 09/25/12, staff has obtained an executed "voluntary consent to demolish" form on 213 Bayshore Dr. (aka N. Bayshore Dr.) so no action by Council will be needed. Council is being asked to review the Board's findings on the remaining (12) locations and then authorize a public hearing for the purpose of ordering repairs or possible condemnation with subsequent demolition of the structures. Staff is requesting a November 12, 2012 public hearing date. Action Required by Council: 1. Review findings of the Dangerous Building Inspection Board; and 2. Consider approval or other action to authorize a November 12, 2012 public hearing date Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date SUBSTANDARD BUILDING LIST (Summer 2012 Group) 1) 9510 Belfast Rd. (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9084-294-000-0253 Legal Description: Blk. 15; Lot 253; Spenwick Place, S. 2 Improvements: $20,668 Taxes Owed: $ 3,264.60 (In October) Mowing/Clean-up: $ 1,705.00 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: $ 450.20 Write -Off, Year 2009 2) 2223 Underwood Rd. (Non -Residential Building in a GC, General Commercial Zone) HCAD: 9023-141-000-0686 Legal Description: Tr. 49013-1; La Porte Outlots Improvements: $2,656 Taxes Owed: 0 Mowing/Clean-up: $ 125.00 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: $ 151.21 Write-off, Year 2000 3) 1829 Valley View Dr. (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9095-333-000-0033 Legal Description: Blk. 1; Lot 33; Greendale U/R Improvements: $26,131 Taxes Owed: $ 1,805.90 (In October) Mowing/Clean-up: $ 540.00 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: $ 440.16 Write-off, Year 2009 4) 129 N. 10t' St. (Hwy 146 North) (Non -Residential Building in a GC, General Commercial Zone) HCAD: 9023-183-050-0027 Legal Description: Blk. 50; Trs. 27-33; La Porte Improvements: $122,912 Taxes Owed: 0 Mowing/Clean-up: 0 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: 0 5) 402 Bay Oaks Rd. (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9063-021-002-0009 Legal Description: Blk. 2; Lot 9; Bay Oaks Improvements: $100 Taxes Owed: 0 Mowing/Clean-up: 0 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: 0 Substandard Building List, Summer 2012 Group Con't.... Page 2 6) 3031 S. Broadway (Old Highway 146) (Apartments in an R-3, High -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9061-057-001-0013 Legal Description: Blk.1; Res. A3; Bayside Terrace R/P Improvements: $168,255 Taxes Owed: 0 Mowing/Clean-up: 0 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: 0 7) 135 Pine Bluff St. (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9058-012-008-0011 Legal Description: Blk. 8; Lot 11; Pine Bluff Improvements: $30,039 Taxes Owed: $ 3,105.67 (In October) Mowing/Clean-up: $ 595.00 (As of 09/21/12) Utility Billing: $ 360.79 Write-offs in 2010 & 2012 8) 213 Bayshore Dr. (aka N. Bayshore Dr.) (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9035-211-012-0001 Legal Description: Blk. 12; Lots 1-3; Sylvan Beach Improvements: $45,403 Taxes Owed: $ 904.27 (In October) Mowing/Clean-up: 0 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: $ 411.95 Write-off, Year 2012 9) 508 Donaldson St. (aka S. Donaldson Ave.) (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9006-123-000-0019 Legal Description: Blk. 33; Lots 19-26; Bayfront to La Porte Improvements: $87,069 Taxes Owed: 0 Mowing/Clean-up: 0 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: 0 10) 111 S. Carroll St. (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 4006-177-000-0006 Legal Description: Blk. 87; Lots 6,7; Bayfront to La Porte Improvements: $48,731 Taxes Owed: $13,945.45 (In October) Mowing/Clean-up: $ 3,875.00 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: 0 Substandard Building List, Summer 2012 Group Con't.... Page 3 11) 303 W. Polk St. (On same property w/ 115 N. 2nd St.) (Secondary Garage Apartment in a MSD, Main Street District) HCAD: 9023-191-000-0032 Legal Description: Blk. 58; Lots 32,33; La Porte Improvements: $45,952 (includes Duplex + Secondary Structure) Taxes Owed: $ 92.02 (In October) Mowing/Clean-up: 0 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: $ 260.33 (Account is active; no payment since Dec. 2011) 12) 318 N. 5d' St. (Single Family Dwelling in an R-1, Low -Density Residential Zone) HCAD: 9023-204-080-0007 Legal Description: Blk. 80; Lots 7,8; La Porte Improvements: $30,173 Taxes Owed: $ 5,368.65 (In October) Mowing/Clean-up: $ 815.00 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: $ 298.25 Write-off, Year 2007 13) 500 W. Main St. (Non -Residential Building in the MSO, Main Street Overlay District) HCAD: 9023-189-000-0021 Legal Description: Blk. 56; Lots 21-23; La Porte Improvements: $44,653 Taxes Owed: 0 Mowing/Clean-up: 0 (As of 08/02/12) Utility Billing: 0 z� pq FJ m opr WII� III II II �,� a r � ✓ Z.Ix 6 IIII fiW J ii P P r � �. �, ❑ w ❑ „. IX Lu v 9 ",'`OII�VI�IIVIO� �4.rO° III �p�u Z�imp r,Q � { ..p I 1SStl31 w 1StlMd110 CO � Y tl N9N -IS-AtlMOVONSS 1S1S IIMII Ilup ❑r Qa b S ee, S ON Z ,,, „A. } �. III �I ..,.,,,, ❑ .. ppn� , 1S H14S � � �u III Y VW � ,.l cl 3 d i4 uP� �S Hl9 °°°sees. m - 11 ��. ,_, 4 w � H1L N !, 1S HIS "' w x II ��I �.,., ,,a� z ¢ � IIMII I� 3 i get, HS N N SH°�. J w u A ....... ra,�„ In ,. .. m ,,,, ae ,,,,,, ��I6���-^�w.94 LHS"' . Hj.910 N ........ I .. ,, ?� ��������r ,,....'..��„L S'H19L�S �r,J i P w rn w - 1S % II 1S H116 S ❑ w ""• 4 3 3 ,. 3 . . j" CIA w 1S H1SZ S O N SN3S .� W y Soo, 00 • I�� N C Q w p ❑ w �,e,.,,� w > z z` z �z 0 N ,,,, ,,,, z ONIONtlI N3ON3dS AA LV NO VANtll //LU� ppp�l 113 A08 V/ Ilppp� iiiuWl m ON 1NOd......... NO a00nu�ia0,. V ppplp II II 0� z G ,,,,,, IL �- ��'�i qua , /�`� ❑ ,,,,,U 0 'll ` 0DUMl33ld i U Q NO Altl a r ON NNVdAtlB C q Y 0jI z u �+o ❑ M �� r r 70 E o a µ� a J „V NO NOl`JNINN tld la..� y° w CIS �� ............... f � i r 3 �� ' e,,....a., �� M ""'"� 'U J � ,..� � �• � r ❑ �. CID O J 4 4 W_..,,. z Q z //� U {/ w ❑ a_ O MI II of W .mON OOOAAN3ONn ��.� OOOMN LU ��������� i a ,, k �,... a,. 3lll U rn NO°LS3M M3N � x Nl-Mtl1OOH U Opp nS�Nvl�� „` rL City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 9/10/2012 STREET ADDRESS: 9510 BELFAST RD HCAD OWNER: SHELLY GAIL ZAFEREO - 9510 BELFAST RD - LA PORTE, TX 77571-3844 DEED OWNER: SHELLY GAIL ZAFEREO - NO ADDRESS SHOWN OTHER: PETER D. ZAFEREO - 2325 LOUISIANA AVE. -DEER PARK TX 77535-381 I LEGAL: ELK 15, LOT 253• SPEN-WICK PLACE SEC 2 OCCUPANCY TYPE: Residential ZONING: R-1 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: Yes —ACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACKS FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER: Y SEWER: Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 V. OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN TILE CITTS CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR TBE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable. I. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 2 ,4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 0 _ 5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure,. or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form Page 2 6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; D�-7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease•, S. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: � I. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; ID,2. Whenever any installation or any portion thercof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay, (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to In, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; ®-__-__4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fie code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARb OF INSPECTION; OPTION#1: PAMABLE--RESIDENTIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS. THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AS ADOPTED. AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES 93293 AND 93388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE. IT IS THE OPINION OF THEDANGEROUSBUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING 13 IN FACT DANGEROUS 131JT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL RE UIRED REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THE TIMETABLE TABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 82-478, IT IS THEN THE OPRQION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. X Q -3-11 BUII.DING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE X 2 g�S `�FIREFFICE DATE FIRE CHIEFS OFFICE -DATE S.City Planning ShareIALPHA-n01-INSPECTIONS DMSIOMAllOther StuModeEnforcementlDangBuildings12012DANGRLDG12012 9510 Belfast Rd Dang Bldg Insp Form -doe 02-2004 Rev. Dangerous Buildings inspection Form BUILDRI C, EVALUATION CHECKLIST page 3 A=Adequate D=Deficient N/A =Not Applicable UNK =Unknown STRUCTURAL COMMENT 1 EXPLANATION' A. Foundation L Slab NIA NIA 2. Pier & Beast a. Footings D UNEVEN SETTLING b. Sills D ROT c.7oists UNIC UNABLE TO VIEW B. N'iralls 1. Exterior D SIDINGMIS5ING 2. Interior UNK UNABLE TO VIEW C. Means of Egress 1. }doors a. Interior UNK UNABLE TO VIEW b. Exterior 13 REAR DOOR BOARDED UP BY CLP 2. Parches, Steps, Stairs A NIA ROT 1 HOLES AT WINDOW FRAMES 3. Windows D D. Roof 1. Rafters iIIAK FACIA ROT 2. Deck, Shingles A NIA E. Ceilings 1. Joists UA1K UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Ceiling —U—N-K UNABLE TO WW F. Floors UNK UNABLE TO VIEW G. Other N� NIA 11. MEHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance D EXPOSED WIRING & Panel U1VK UNABLE TO VIEW —BOARDED UP BY CLP 2. Wiring 3. Lights, Switches UNK UNABLE TO VIEW —BOARDED UP BY CLP 4. Outlets UNK UNABLE TO VIEW —BOARDED UP BY CH UNABLE TO VIEW —BOARDED UP BY CLP 5. Other UNK B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink UNK LINABLE TO VIEW b. Lavatories LINK LINABLE TO VIEW a. Water/Closets UNK UNABLE TO VIEW d. Tub/Shower UNK UNABLE TO VIEW e. Water Beater UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Water Piping LINK UNABLE TO VIEW 3. Drain, Waste & Vent UNIC UNABLE TO VIEW 4, Sewer/Septic tank NIA NIA 5. Gas System UNK LINABLE TO VIEW C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Air Conditioning UNK WINDOW UNIT III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS DETACHED GARAGE• ROT- FIRE DAMAGE• 1. Accessory Structures D UNSAFE WIRiA7G 2. Condition of Grounds D WEEDS 3. Other Comments! CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES 11 SINCE 2069 VACANT SINCE 2008 S:ICity Planning Shaza1ALPRA-IX01-INSPECTIONS DIVISI0�NW[ Other StuIIlCode EnforcementlDang ]Buildings12012 RANG BLDGY2012 9510 Belfast Rd Dang Bldg Insp Form.doo 02-2004 Rev. City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 9/l0/2012 STREET ADDRESS: 2223 UNDERZVOOD RD •HCAD OWNER: HEALTH & SAFETY (GMT INC - 1245 IV CADTNAL DR - BFAUM )NT TX 77705 ATTENTION: MCHARD P. GRIFFINPRESIDENT DEED OWNER: THREE POINT INVESTMENTS LTD. - 1245 W. CADIMAL DR.- BEAUMONT TX 77705 ATTENTION: 3AMES H. GRIFFIN MANAGER OTHER: NIA LEGAL: TR 490 B-1: LA PORTF OUTLOTS OCCUPANCY TYPE: COMMERCIAL ,ZONING: GC NON CONFORMING ISSUES: YES —PARKING BUILDING SET BACKS FACILITIES AVAII.ABLE: WATER: Y SEWER: y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: VACANT: OCCUPIED: NO AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82, ARTICLE Vill, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY; AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the foliowing is applicable: _-1. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any Other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or. decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 0 -5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Aangerous Buildings inspection Form Page 2 DKJ__6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; NIA 7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or othenvise, is determined by the Board to be , unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is Iikely to cause sickness or disease; S. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, Iack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any. or all of the following is applicable: I. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; J�1_2. 'Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3, `Yhenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety, M__4. • Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fare code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #3: (NON-RESIDENTIAL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY' S DANGEROUS BUMDING.REGULATIONS, THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AS ADOPTED, AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND 93388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE, IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS BUT STILL REPAIltABLE. ALL REQUIRED REPAMS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITHIN TIME TIMETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE Vlff, SECTION 82-478, IT IS THEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. X -<�)' �Vj_"r� e -/a BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE X FIRE S 'S OFFICE DATE FW CHIEFS OFFII DATE S;ICity Planning Shar0ALPHA-1101-1NSPEC'n0NS DIVISIONWI Other Stu>ilCode FArcementWang Boildings%2012 DANGBLDGU012 2223 Undemwd Rd DangBldg Imp Form.doc 02-20N Rev. - Langerou5-nuiiuutgsriEspecuutirurrn page .3 BUILDING LVALUATION CHECKLIST A = Adequate D Deficient 1`T/A = Not Applicable UNK = Unknown STRUCTURAL COMMENTIEXPLANATION A.. Foundation I. Slab A NIA 2. Pier & Beam a. Footings NIA NIA b. Sills NA_ NIA c. Joists NJA NIA B. Walls 1. Exterior D_ HOLE IN WALL: RUST 2. Interior USN UNABLE TO VIEW C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior UNK UNABLE TO VIEW b. Exterior D BOARDED UP 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs D FRONT AWNING DAMAGED 3. Windows D BOARDED UP D. Ro of 1. Rafters UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Deck UNK UNABLE TO VIEW E. Ceilings 1. Joists UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Ceiling UUW UNA13LE TO VIEW F. Flours PNK UNABLE TO VIEW G. Other NIA NIA U. WHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel A FALLING OFF BUILDING 2. Wiring UN UNABLE TO VIEW 3. Lights, Switches UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 4. Outlets UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Other LINK UNABLE TO VIEW B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink UD UNABLE TO VIEW b. Lavatories UNK UNABLE TO VIEW c, Water/Closets UNK UNABLE TO VIEW d. Tub/Shower UNK UNABLE TO VIEW e. 'Water Heater UNK LINABLE TO VIEW 2. Water Piping !jW UNABLE TO VIEW 3. Drain, Waste & Vent UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 4. Sewer A NIA 5. Gas System UNK NIA C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating P— UNITS MISSING 2. Air Conditioning D UNITS MISSING III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS L Accessory Structures N1A NIA 2. Condition of Grounds D PEBRIS; WEEDS: OVER GROWN . 3. Other Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES 7 SINCE 2002 PARKING LOT FAILING 1 HOLES S:1CityPlaming5barelALPHA-MI-INSPECTIONS DIVISIOW1 11 MerStuflWodeEnforumentiDangBcildingsWUDANGBLDGV022 2223 Undermvod Rd Dang Bldg lnsp Form.doa 02-2004 Rev. City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 9/ 10/2012 STREET ADDRESS: 1929 VALLEY VIEW DR HCAD OWNER: LORRAINE N RONNING - 1829 VALLEY VIEW J)R - LA PORTS, TX 77571-9347 DEED ONVNER: LORRAINE N RONNING-1829 VALLEY VIEW DRIVE- LA PORTE, TX 77571 OTHER: JP MORGAN CHASE - 800 BROOKSEDGE BLVD,- WESTERVILLE OH 43081 ATTENTION: DAVID M. D'ALESIO OTHER (2): DEAN C. RONNING - 612 W MURRILL AVE, - BAYTOWN, TX 77520-4542 LEGAL: BLK I: LOT 33: GREENDALE U/R OCCUPANCY TYPE: Residential ZONING: R-1 NON-CONFORIMING ISSUES: NONE FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER: Y SEWER: Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: I VACANT: Y OCCUPIED: NO AS REQI0IRED IN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: mil. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant bui Idings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, Mood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strengtb or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; �-,_ .3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 21_4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a)' dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; � 5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form Page -2 ®__._ 6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; DD7, Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement; inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or othenvise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unlit for humann habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; 8. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure sball be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: 1. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; DKL_2. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes.a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; •4. Whenever any installation or any -portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #1: (REPAIRABLE = RESIDENTIAL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS, THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL. CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AS ADOPTED, AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND #3388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE, IT LS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT TIM BUILDING IS IN PACT DANGEROUS, BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REOUIRED REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE TN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THE TAVIETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 82-479, IT IS THEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE X ii FIRE 'S O FlCE DATE x� 1. ifll�.� 9�i//o? F C F'S OFFICES DATE SACity Planning ShareIALPIIA-I101-INSPECTIONS DIVISIONW) Other StuHlCode Enforccmen[1Dang Buildings12012 RANG 13LWX2012 1829 Valley View Dr Dang Bldg Insp Forrn.doc 02-20D4 Rev. ,Dangerous Buildings Lnspection Form page 3 BUILDING EVALUATION CIIFCIMIST A = Adequate D = Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNK = Unknown 1. STRTICTURAI-• COMACNTIFNPLANATION A. Foundation 1. Slab A NIA 2. Pier & Beam a. Footings NIA NIA b. Sills NIA NIA c.Joists NIA N!A B. Walls 1. Exterior HoLES & ROT 2. Interior UNK NIA C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior i N�1 BOARDED UP b. Exterior A BOARDED UP' 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs A NIA 3. Windows P— SOME BOARDED UP D. Roof 1. Rafters 1).___ ROT 2. Deck, Shingles �_ HOLES. ROT. FACIA ROT E. Ceilings. 1. Joists D ROT 2. Ceiling D_._ ALLINGIN fAWIND ON F. Floors LINK LINABLE TO VIEW G. Other QUA_ NIA 11. MBHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & panel D--,-_ DEAT FRONT DAMAGED 2. Wiring UNK LINABLE TO VIEW 3. bights, Switches _UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 4. Outlets UNK UNABLE TO VIEW S. Other UI\K UNABLE TO VIEW B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink LINK UNABLE TO VIEW b. Lavatories UNK UNABLE TO VIEN c. Water/Closets UNK LINABLE TO VIEW d. Tub/Shower UNK UNABLE TOVTEW e. Water Heater ? 7 2. Water Piping LINTS UNABLE TO VIEW 3. Drain, Waste & Vent A BROKEN I DISLODGED 4. Sewer/Septic tank UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Gas System UNK NONE RISER! METER VISLBL.E C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating LINK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Air Conditioning 1) UNITMISSWO III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures NA MA 2. Condition of Grounds D WEEDS/ DEBRIS 3. Other Comments. CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES 7 SINCE 2009 SACity Planning SharelALPHA-1101-INSPECTIONS DIVISIONW1 OtherStufflCode Enforcemen(lDang Buildin,&0012 DANG 13LDG12012 1829 Valley View Dr Dang Bldg Insp FormAm 02-2004 Rev. City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 9-10-12 STREET ADDRESS: 129 N. 10'h St (H N 146 N) OiYNER' DG12IS 1 IiJDICE & GLENN TUDICE — 22203 FERN ROSE GT. -MAGNOLIA;TX 77355-3903 DEED OWNER DORIS I ICE ORMERLY DOR1S I PA AND GLfiNN IU�ICE - 22203 FERN ROSE CT - MAGNOLIA. TX 77355 LEGAL: BLK 50 TRS 27-33 LA PORTE OCCUPANCY TYPE: COMMERCIAL ZONING: GC NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: YES- BLDG SET BACKS FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER Y SEWER Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS; NIA OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIA THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. ]dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is npplicable: I. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up, 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is . materially less than it was before such catastrophe, and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. 'Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the.deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 5. 'Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Dangerous Miildings Inspection Form Page 2 6. Whenever the building or stricture has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; 7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; 8. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: 1. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; 2. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty constriction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; , 4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION 43: (NON-RESIDENTIAI 1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND THB 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AS ADOPTED AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES 43293 AND #3388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS OR. ALTERATIONS SHALL BB DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH wITIHN THE TIMETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VM SECTION 82-478 IT IS TBEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. 1 a �13 BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE x 4-1-7- �2 F S S OFFICE DATE FIRE CHIEEF'S OFFICE DATE Page 3 Dangerous Building Inspection Form BUILDING EVALUATION CHECKLIST A = Adequate 1) = Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNIT UNKNOWN CONEENT / ENPLANATION ;. STRUCTI7KAL A. Foundation A NIA 1. Slab 2. Pier & Beam NIA NIA a. Footings b. Sills NIA NIA 0, Joists NIA NIA B. Walls D SIDING FALLING OFF/ ROT 1. Exterior 2, Interior D UNFINISHED C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior D MISSING b. Exterior A N/A 2. Porches, Steps, SIMET hD AL ROOF DAMAGED Stairs-- 3. Windows A NIA Roof 1. Rafters 1. D ROT/TEIRNIITES 2. Deck Shingles E. Ceilings 1. Joists UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Ceiling UNK UNABLE TO VIEW F. Floors A N/A G. Other NIA NIA II. MEHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel D xpOSED tiVIItING 2. Wiring 3. Lights, Switches P--• D DNFIrTISl3ED �V1R11IG REPAIRS NOT FINISHED 4. Outlets D UNFINISHED ING- REPAI ,S NOT FINISHED 5. Other B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink UNK UNABLE TO VIEW b. Lavatories UNK UNABLE TO VIEW c. Water/Closets UNK UNABLE TO VIEW d. Tub/Shower UNIC UNABLE TO VIEW e. Water Heater UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Water Piping UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 3, Drain, Waste & Vent UNK UNABLE TO VIEW A. Sewer/Septic&Vetank UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Gas System UNK UNABLE TO ViE\V C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating UNK TUNp,BLE TO VIEW 2. Air Conditioning UNK UNABLE TO VIE1V Ill. PROPEM CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures NIA NIA 2. Condition of Grounds D `NEEDS 3. Other Continents: CODE. ENFOR'ENIENT CASES 11 SINCE 2000 FIRE DAMAGED 2110109 City of La Porte DANGEROUS. BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 9-10-12 STREET ADDRESS: 402 BAY OAKS RD OWNER:7ESUSFcBLANCAVnLARREAL 4510NATiTRALBRIDGEI]kt-KING�=TOOD TX77345-1033 DEED OWNER: )ESUS & SLANCA V3C LARREAL-4510 NA'!"URAL BRIJa(2 - KINO�VOOi� TX 77345 LEGAL: BLK 2 LOT 9 BAY OAKS OCCUPANCY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: R 1 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: NONE FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER Y SEWER Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: I VACANT: Y OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITTS CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD ON INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED TI-IEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A, Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: 1. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code "standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability tbereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to eollapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (c) any otber cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of *hicb it is being used; Dangerous Buildings Inspection Fort Page 2 5. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; 7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; S. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of siifficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: I. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; 1-2. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety, 4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. , FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #1: (REP MABLE — RESIDENTIAL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY' S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS, THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AS ADOPTED, AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND #3388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS 13UILDINTO IS IN FACT DANGEROUS BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THE TIMETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIII SECTION 82-478 IT IS THEN THE OPINION OIL "PHIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. X Q6 � � d� i3 -ra BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE FM ARSHAL'S OFFICE DATE X A/-01 -64e/417 FIRE CHIEFS OFFICE DATE Dangerous Building Inspection Form Pago 3 BUILDING EVALUATION CHECKLIST A = Adequate D = Deficient ' NIA = Not Applicable UNK = UNKATOWN I. STRUCTURAL COMMENT / EXPLANATION A. Foundation 1. Slab D REAR ADDITION - CRACKS 2. Pier & Beam a. Footings D UNEVEN SETTLING: WALL SEPARATION b. Sills D SOME MISSING c. Joists D SOME MISSING B. Walls 1. Exterior D WALL SEPARATION 2. Interior D SOME C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior D MISSING b. Exterior D BOARDED UP 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs A NIA 3. Windows D BOARDED UP D. Roof 1. Rafters D SOFFITT I FACIA DAMAGE 2. Deck, Shingles A NIA E. Ceilings 1. Joists D SAG 2. Ceiling D NO SHEETROCK / INSULATION F. Floors �� MISSING/DANIA.GED G. Other II. MEHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel D NO BREAKERS 2. Wiring - D NOIVIRJNG 3. Lights, Switches D NO NVHUNG 4. Outlets D NO WIRING 5, Other B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink D NONE b. Lavatories D NONE c. Water/Closets D A`O1V13 d. Tub/Shower D NONE e. Water Beater D NONE 2. Water Piping D NONE. 3. Drain, Waste & Vent P NONE 4. Sawer/Septic tank UNK UNABLE TO INSPECT 5. Gas System UNK UNABLE TO INSPECT C. Pleating & A/C 1. Heating 2. Air Conditioning D OUTSIDE UNIT: NO DUCTS III, PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessary Structures N/A NIA 2. Condition of Grounds D WEEDS 3. Other ' Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES (6) SINCE 2000 S•1City Planing Shar6ALPHA-1t01-INSPECTI0; IS DIVISIOMAII Other Stuf tCode EnforcementlDane Euildine>12012 RANG BLDG12012 402 Bay Oaks Rd Dang Bldg Wp Form.doc City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 9-10-12 STREET ADDRESS: 3031 OLD HWY 146 S. BROADWAY O«IER: 5 €� Zl AN G 1LECT R °/a WII IDSAIL $AY APARi'\1E1 'rS 3141 0LD HUG AY €46 S - LA PORTH, TX 77571-6570 DEED OWNER: SUZAN GAYLE RECTOR — 3141 S BROADWAY ST LA FORTE TX 77571 LEGAL: BLK 1 RES A-3 BAYSIDE TERRACE R/P OCCUPANCY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL ZONIINTG: R-3 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: YES - BUILDING SET BACKS SIDE &FRONT FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER Y SEWER Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: UNK VACANT: OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: 4 1. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; &CH Plannin ShareIALPBA.1101-INSPECT€ NS DIV€SION1All Other StufACode Enfor ment\Dano Btfilding 12012 DANG BLD02012 031 Old Hw 146 Dang Bids Insp Form.doc Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form Page 2 6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; 7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such; a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; S. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of suffrcieut fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. - Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure sball be considered dangerous or substandard `whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable; 1. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; . � 2. 'Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to fife, health, property Or safety; 4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION#1: (REPAIRABLE-RESIDRfIAL) IN T ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIT Y'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND TBE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL COME, AS ADOPTED, AMENDED AND ENACTED 13Y CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND #3388. USING TBE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION B OARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REOUIRED REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITI-N THE TIMETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIH SECTION 82-478 IT IS THEN TIIE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT TMS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE X 1� r2 FIRE S 'S OFFICE DATE X Li M, FIR CHtF'S-OFFI� , , '. - - 1 �E r//� S:1City Plannin" Share'ALPHA-IIOI-INSPECTIONS DIVISIONWI OtherStufilCode EnforoementxpanBuildines12t112 DA-NIG BLDG12012 3031 Old IIwY 146 bane Bldg InsP Form.doc Dangtrous Building Inspection Form Page 3 BUILDING EVALUATION CHECKLIST A = Adequate D _ Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNK = UNKNOWN I. STRUCTURAL COMMENT 1 EXPLANATION A. Foundation 1. Slab A NIA 2. Pier & Seam a. Footings NIA NIA b. Sills NIA NIA r: Joists NIA NIA B. Walls 1. Exterior D DAMAGBDISIDINGMISSING 2. Interior D DAMAGED/MISSING SHEETROCK VARIOUS LOCAVONS C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior UNK LINABLE TO VIEW EACH UNIT b. Exterior 1- DAMAGED ENTRYDOORS & BROKEN GLASS 2. Porches, Steps, PATIO DOORS Stairs D RUSTED DECAYED STEPS 3. Windows D BROKEN WINDOWS D. Roof L Rafters LINK UNABLE TO VIEW EACH UNIT 2. Deck, Shingles UNK UNABLE TO VIEW EACH UNIT E. Ceilings 1. Joists D DAMAGED JOIST IN PARKING AREA 2. Ceiling D SHEETROCK FALLING VARIOUS AREAS & MISSING PARKING AREA UNDER DWELLING UNITS F. Jiloors UNK UNABLE TO VIEW EACH UNIT G, Other D ROTTEIN/DBCA'YED 1. A/C CONDENSING UNIT PLATFORMS H. 3v HCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel A NIA 2. Wiring D EXPOSED ROMEX IN STORAGE AREA 3. Lights, Switches D EXT.LIGHT FIXTURE HANGING BY WIRING 4. Outlets A MSSINGJUNCTIONB XCOVERS&FIXTURES IN SEVERAL AREAS 5. Other B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink UNK UNABLE TO VIEW EACH UNIT b: Lavatories UNK UNABLE TO VIEW EACH UNIT c. Water/Closets D NOT IN PLACE/IVIISSING VARIOUS UNITS d. Tub/Shower UNK UNABLE TO VIEW e. Water Heater. UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Water Piping D EVIDENCE OF LEAKS UNDER UNITS 3. Drain, Waste & Vent UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 4. Sewer/Septic tank UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Gas System UNK UNABLE TO VIEW C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating D DISCONNECTED COILS/ BLOWERS ON GROUND 2. Air Conditioning D UNITS NEED PROPER SUPPORT Ill. PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures- N/A NIA 2. Condition of Grounds D DEBRIS 3. Other Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES (10) SINCE 2000 :1Ci ianningShareIALPHA-II01-INSPECTIONS➢IVISION\MIOtherStuffiCodaFnforcementlDandBuildin s12012 GBL➢G12012 3031 Old H%w 146 Dan_ BBift Insp Forrn,&e City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 9-10-12 STREET ADDRESS: 135 PINE BLUFF ST OWNER: SUSAN NICHOLEBAKER-135 PINE BLUFF ST- LA PORTS TX 77571-6623 DEED OWNER: SUSAN NICHOLEBAKER- NO ADDRESS SHO1xTN OTHER: SUSAN NICHOLEBAKER-125 % WOOA AVE.- BAYTOWN TX 77520-1733 OTHER (2): SUSAN BAKER-2818 D ST LA FORTE TX 77571 LEGAL: BLK 8 LOT 11 PINE BLUFF OCCUPANCY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: R-1 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: NONE FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER Y SEWER Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 VACANT: Y OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE Vill, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. ]Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: I. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minhnum requirements of tho building code for new buildings of similar stricture, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) tho deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (o) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; S:ICi.ty Planning ShareIALPHA-1101-INSPECTIONS DTVISION1All Other Stuff\Code BnforcemenADang Buildings12012 DANG BLDG12012 t35 Pine Bluff St Dang Bldg Insp Form.doc Dangerous Buildings InspectionFonn Page 2 6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; 7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is Rely to cause sickness or disease; S. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: 1. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; 2. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; .� 4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential bazard to life, health, property or safety. FR,TDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #1: (REPAJ ABLE — RESIDENTIAL) IN ACCORDANCE IDTH THE CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS, TIM 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AS ADOPTED AMENDED'AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND #3388, USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS, BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTS CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THE TIMETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIIT SECTION 82-478 PT IS THRN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. T43--1 '-e BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE 1?-12 FIRE S 'S OFFICE DATE FIRE d HEP'S OFFICE DATE S:1City Planning ShareIALPHA-IIOI-INSPECTIONS DIVISIONWI Other StuftlCode Enforeement\Dang Buildings12012 DANG BLDG12012 135 Pine Bluff St Dang Bldg Insp Form.do c Dangerous Building Inspection Form Page 3 BUILDING EVALUATION cDECKLIST A = Adequate D = Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNK = Unknown I. STRUCTURAL COMMENT / EXPLANATION A. Foundation 1. Slab NIA NIA 2. Pier & B earn a. Footings D UNEVEN SETTLING b. Sills D ROT a Joists ROT B. Walls I. Exterior D ROT 2. Interior I? MISSING & DAMAGED C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior D MISSING b. Exterior �.. BOARDED UP 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs A N/A 3. Windows T) BOARDED UP D. hoof 1. Rafters D WATERLEAKSEVI7)ENT 2. Deck, Shingles D SAGGING AREAS E. Ceilings 1, Joists X3A1AGED 2. Ceiling � DAMAGED• MISSING F. Floors D HOLES -UNEVEN G. Other NIA NIA II. hMH—QANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel A NIA 2. Wiring D DAMAGED 3. Lights, Switches D DAMAGED 4. Outlets D DAMAGED 5. Othor N/A NIA 13. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink D DISCONNECTED/MISSING b. Lavatories D DISCONNECTEDWSSiNG c. Water/Closets D DISCONNECTEDIMISSING d. Tub/Shower _ DISCONNECTED&USSING e. Water Heater D_ DISCONNECTED/MISSING 2. Water Piping D DISCON MMD/MISSING 3. Drain, Waste & Vent D DISCONNECTEDfMT33ING 4. Sewer/Septic tank UNK UNABLE TO INSPECT 5. Gas System UNK UNABLE TO INSPECT C. Keating & A/C I. Heating UNK UNABLE TO INSPECT 2. Air Conditioning UNK WINDOW UNIT VISIBLE III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures N/A NIA, 2. Condition of Grounds D WEEDS & DEBRIS 3. Other Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES 18 SINCE 2004 3:1City Planning ShareULPHA-1101-INSPECTIONS DIVISIONVUI Other StufflCode BnforcementlDang BuildingsM12 DANG BLD02012 135 Pine Bluff St Dang Bldg Insp Fonn.doc City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 09/11/2012 STREET ADDRESS: 213 BAYSHORE DR (213 N BAYSIIOI2E HCAD OWNER: NORMA L REPMAN ET AL — P.O_ BOX 434- LA PORTS TX 77572-0434 DEED OWNER: NORMA LEOLA ODELL-REPMAN - P.O. BOX 434 - LA PORTE TX 77572 OTHER: NORMA L REPMAN ET Alr 134 GROVE ST- LA PORTE TX 77571 LEGAL: BLK 12• LOTS 1-3' SYLVAN BEACH OCCUPANCY TYPE: Residential ZONING: R 1 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: YES-13UMDING SET 13ACKS FRONT & SIDE FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER: Y SEWER: Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 VACANT: OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined•by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; D�1_,__,_.,._5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Dangerous Buildings Tnspection Form Page 2 S. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; D�_7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or othenvise, is determined by -the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is Iikely to cause sickness or disease; �8. Whenever any .building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be afire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall. be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: �I. . Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; � 2. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; 0_-..-___.4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as. to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #1: (REPAIRABLE -- RESIDENTIAL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS, THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL_ CODE, AS ADOPTED, AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND 43388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS, BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REOUIRBD REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THE TIMETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIH SECTION-82-478. IT IS THEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLIKMD. x a a r� BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE x dL, 9- r-7 - /2 FJRE / � � 9117, 'S OFFICE �yDATE � FIRE CHIEFS OFFICE DATE SACityPlanning SharekA,LPHA-1101-INSPECTIONSDIVISIOMAIIOther5tu8iCodeEnforcementMang Buildings12612.DANGBJ_DCi12012 213 Bsyshore Dr Dang Bldg Insp Form.doc Ca 2003 Rev. Dangerous Buildings inspection Form page 3 A = Adequate STRUCTURAL A. Foundation 1. Slab 2, Pier & Beam a. Footings b. Sills c. Joists B. Walls 1. Exterior 2. Interior C, Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior b. Exterior 2, Porches, Steps, Stairs 3. Windows D. Roof 1, Rafters 2. Deck, Shingles E. Ceilings 1. Joists 2. Ceiling F. FIoors G. Other II. MEHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel 2, Wiring . 3, Lights, Switches 4. Outlets 5. Other B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a Sink b. Lavatories e. Water/Closets d. Tub/Shower e, Water heater 2. Water Piping 3. Drain, Waste & Vent 4. Sewer/Septic tank 5. Gas System C, Heating & A/C 1. Heating 2. Air Conditioning III, PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures BUILDING EVALUATION CH-ECKLIST D N/A NIA NIA D UNK D = Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNK = Unknown D A UNK D A A_ D_ NIA UNK D_ UNK UNK NIA COMMENT! EXPLANATION UNEVEN SETTLING UNABLE TO VIEW UNABLE TO VIEW UNABLE TO VIEW CRACK VISIBLE THROUGH 1VINDOW PANEL INSIDE UNABLE TO VIEW EXPOSED: OUTSIDE WIRING UNABLE TO VIEW UNABLETO VIEW UNK UNABLE TO VIEW UNK UNABLE TO VIEW UNK UNABLE TO V IEW UNK UNABLE TO VIEW D (2) WATER HEATERS. BOTH OUTSIDE UNK UNABLE TO VIEW UNK UNABLE TO VIEW UNK UNABLE TO VIEW UNK UNABLE TO VIEW UNK UNABLE TO VIEW D DAMAGED D DETACHED CrARAGE HOLES/ ROT IN WALLS & ROOF 2. Condition of Grounds D 1VEMS& DEBRIS OVERGROWTH 3. Other NIA NIA Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES Q SINCE 2001 3:1C"sty Planning Shaze1ALPHA-4101-INSPECTIONS DiVISIONW] other StufACode EnforcemenllDang Building 12012 RANG BLDG\2012 213 Bayshore Dr Dang Bldg Insp Form.doc 02-2004 Rev. City of La Porto DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 09/1=012 STREET ADDRESS: 508 DONALDSON ST (S08 S DONALDSON AVE) HCAD OWNER: ELMER H.PFEIFFER--PO BOX 983 - 508 DONALDSON ST - LA PORTE, TX 77571-5712 DEED OWNER: ELMER HUGH PFEIFFER - P.O. BOX 933 - LA PORTS TX 77571-5712 OTHER: DONNA 7. PFEIFFER -2601 S. BROADWAY ST #76 - LA PORTE TX 77571 LEGAL: BLK 33 • LOTS 19-26, BAYPRONT TO LAPORTE OCCUPANCY TYPE: Residential ZONING: R 1 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: NONE FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER: Y SEWER: Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 VACANT: OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82, "ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE .AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable; f _ ._.__1. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; �_ __"_",2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; �3. Whonovor any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or stricture, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or, decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; EL-5- Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Dangerous Buildings inspection Form Page 2 Dg_& Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, ar has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; * _7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; *8. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of suftcie'nt fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: . _ �_l. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Cade and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to ' fail or function as originally intended; 2. 'Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; 4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FjNDINCS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #2• NOT REPAIRABLE — RESIDENTIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AS ADOPTED AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293AND #3388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE OPINTONT OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS BUT NOT REPAIRABLE AND SHOULD BE DEMOLISHED. THIS BUILDING DOES NOT PROVIDE THE BASIC MINIMCIM HOUSING STANDARDS DEEMED ESSENTIAL FOR SAFE AND HEALTHFUL LIVING FOR A RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY AND IS A THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY HEALTH AND THE GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF LA PORTE. x BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE xC ' � 2 F 'S OFFICE DATE FIRE CHIPS OFFIC ATE S:ICityPlanning ShareIALPHA-110I-TNSPECTIONSDMSIONWIOtbuSWMCa&EnforcementTangBuildings12012DANGBLDG12012 508 Donaldson St Dang Btdg Insp Form.doo 02-2004 Rev. Dangerous Buildings Xnspectioit Form page 3 A = Adequate I. STRUCTURAL A. Foundation 1. Slab 2. Pier & D cam a. Footings b. Sills c. Joists B. AValls 1. Exterior 2. Interior C. Means of Egress I. boors a. Interior b, Exterior 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs 3. Windows B. Roof 1. Rafters 2. Deck, Shingles E. Ceilings 1, Joists 2, Ceiling F, FIoors G. Other U. MR14CANICAL SYSTEMS A, Electrical L Service Entrance & Panel 2. Nixing BUILDING EVALUATION CIMCKLIST D = Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNK= UnImown COMMENT I EXPLANATION D MIA NA NIA D_ D- - D D D D D D D D D N!A FIitE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FARE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED LIRE DAMAGED FARE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED FIRE DAMAGED 3. Lights, Switches - D FIRE DAMAGED 4. Outlets D FIRE DAMAGED 5, Other NIA NIA B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink D FIREDAMAGED b. Lavatories D FIRE DAMAGED c. Water1closets D FIRE DAMAGED d. Tub/Shower D FIRE DAMAGED c. Water Beater D FIRE DAMAGED 2. Water Piping ?D FIRE DAMAGED 3. Drain, Waste & Vent D FIRE DAMAGED 4. Sewer/Septic tank D ytRE DAMAGED 5. Gas System P— C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating D IRE DAMAGED 2. Air Conditioning D FIRE DAMAGED III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures D FIRE DAMAGED 2. Condition of Grounds D DEBRIS 3. Other E/A NIA COmmentS:,FIRE DAMAGE (02 26-12)• FMO RELEASE ON 07-06-12-, CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES (3) SINCE 2012 SACityPlanning ShareIALPHA-IIOI-INSPECE0NSI]MSIOMAllOthtrStofflCodeEnforceraent angBuildings120l2DANGBLD02012 508 Donaldson St Dana Bldg Insp Fonn.doc 02 2004 Rev. City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 09/12/2012 STREET ADDRESS: 111 S CARROLL SIT HCAD OWNER: LA FORTE ISD CAUSE #2bb9.47b19 — 604 W FAiRMONT PKWY - LA FORTE TX 77571-6215 DEED OWNER: LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT GO PERDUE BRANDON FIELDER, COLLINS & MOTT L.L.P - 1235 NORTH LOOP WEST SUITS 600 - liUU 1 ON TEXAS 77008 OTHER: N!A LEGAU BLK 87• ITS 5 & 7 BAYFRONT TO LA FORTE OCCUPANCYTYPE: Residential ZONING: R-1 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: NONE FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER: Y SEWER: Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 VACANT: Y OCCUPIED: NO AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERIvHNED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up, 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removat, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form Page 2 6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or salutation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; .8. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be afire hazard; Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: _1. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to In, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or. any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; ' Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #1 • (REPAIAABL.E -- RESIDENTIAL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH'1'I3E CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS TBE 2009 INTERNATIONAL Rl?SIDENTIAL. CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AS ADOPTED AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND 43388. US1NG•THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE opiNION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS BUT STILL REPAIRABLE, ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTS GODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THE TIMETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIM SECTION 82-478 IT IS THEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT TINS BUILD]NG BE DEMOLISHED. 13LIlL ING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE j X —!� F is O FICE DATE X FIRE CHIMP'S OFFICE DATE S:ICity Punning ShareIALPHA•1101-INSP➢CIlOhS DIVISIONWi Other Stu@1Code EnforeementlDang ➢uildings12012 RANG BLDOU0l2 1113 Carroll St Dang Bldg Insp Form.doc 02-20DI Rev. Llangemus Buildings Inspection Form page 3 A = Adequate [. STRUCTURAL A. Foundation 1. Slab 2. Pier & Beam a. Footings b. Sills c. Joists B. Walls 1. Exterior 2. Interior C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior b. Exterior 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs 3. Windows D. Roof 1. Rafters 2. Deck, Shingles E. Ceilings 1. Joists 2. Ceiling F. Floors G. Other H. NMHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel 2. Wiring BUII.DING EVALUATION CHF.CKLTST UNK NIA NIA NIA D D D D D D D D D_ D NIA M rim D = Deficient N/A = Not Applicable UNK = Unknown COMMENT / EXPLANATION UNABLE TO VIEW ROT VISIBLE THRU WINDOWS BOARDED UP BY CITY OF LA PORTE IMSSING BOARDED UP ROT HOLES WATER DAMAGE WEATIERHEAD NOT TO CODE: UNABLE TO VIBW INT. PANEL EXPOSED,UNPROTECTED 3. Lights, Switches . UNK UNABLE TO. VIEW 4. Outlets D EXPOSED 5. Other NIA NIA B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink -UNK UNABLE TO VIEW b. Lavatories UNK UNABLE TO VIEW c. Water/Closets UNK UNABLE TO VIEW d. Tub/Shower UNK UNABLE TO VIEW e. Water heater UNK UNABLE. TO VIEW 2. Water Piping UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 3. Drain, Waste & Vent UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 4. Sewer/Septic tank UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Gas System U.� UNABLE TO VIEW C. Heating & A/C 1. heating ONK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Air Conditioning NIA NIA III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures D DETACHED GARAGE —ROTMOLES 2. Condition of Grounds D WEEDS. DEBRIS 3. Other _ Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES (25)SINCE 2000 m S:\City Planning SharelALPHA-DO1-INSPECTIONSDMSIONWIOtherStufACodeEniorcementMangHuildbn 5VO12DANGBLDG12012 1113 Carol[ St Dang Bldg Insp 1:ormdoc 02-2004 Rev. City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE; 09/12/2012 STREET ADDRESS: 303 W POLK ST 115 N 2ND ST HCAD OWNER: LOUIS SENEGAL-115 N 2 m ST - LA PORTS TX 77571-3433 DEED OWNER, LOUIS SMOAL ET UX ALICE SINEGAL —115 NORTH T" STREET- LA PORTE TX 77571 OTHER: NIA LEGAL: BLK 58• LOT 32 & 33• LA PORTE OCCUPANCYTYPE: Residential ZONING: MSD NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: YES - 2ND DWELLING SETBACKS & DRIVE WAY FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER: ELECTRICAL: SEWER: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: 2ND DWELLING ON PROPERTY VACANT: Y OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN I THE CITX'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: See. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: A building that is vacant and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 0-.,._3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; Z_4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; 0-5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it is being used; Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form Page 2 6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; 7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to he unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; S. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be afire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: 1. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective,. dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to -threaten to fail or function as originally intended; Dg_2. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; D�_4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF TPIE 130ARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION#l: (REPAIRABLE --RESIDENTIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS THE 2009 RrMRNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CORE AND TILE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODB AS ADOPTED AMENDED AND NACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND #3388. USING TITS REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT S THE OPRIION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUA DING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS, BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REOUIRBD REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE ]N ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTS CODES AND ORDINANCES. 1F THB REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITHWITaN THE TRAETABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE Vlu SECTION 82-478 IT IS THEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. X BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE Xl �/ Y �l FTRE�AR�'S OFFICE ➢AIL FIRE CHMF'S OFFICE DATE S:1City planning ShareIALPHA-I101-INSPECTIONS DIVISIONWI Other StufflCode EnforcementlDang Buildings12012 DANCrBLDG12012 393 W folk St Dan.- Bldg Insp Form.doe 02-2004 Rev. BUMI)ING EVALUATION CRECIMIST A = Adequate D Deficient NIA, = Not Applicable LINK = Unknown STRUCTURAL COMMENT / EXPLANATION A. Foundation 1. Slab NIA , NIA 2. Pier & Beam a. Footings D ROT, UNEVEN SETTLING b. Sills D ROT, UNEVEN SETTLING c. Joists D ROT, UNEVEN SETTLING B. Walls 1, Exterior D ROT / SEPARATION 2. Interior LTA UNABLE TO VIEW C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a, Interior r 1, UNABLE TO VIEW b. Exterior A NIA 2. Parches, Steps, Stairs A NIA 3. Windows ' D ROT: BROKEN D, Roof 1. Rafters D ROT 2. Deck, Shingles D HOLES E. Ceilings 1. Joists D FALLINGIN(GARAGE) 2. Ceiling UNK DWELLING AREA — UNABLE TOVIEW F. Floors UNK DWELLINGAREA —UNABLETO VIEW G. Other N/A NIA H. N EHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel D METER NOT TO CODE: INTERIOR PANNEL UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Wiring D EXPOSED, UNPROTECTED 3. Lights, Switchos UNK DWELLING AREA —UNABLE TOVIEW 4. Outlets UNK DWELLING AREA —UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Other NIA NIA B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a.. Sink UNK DWELL1NGAREA— UNABLE TO VIEW b. Lavatories UNK DWELLING AREA —UNABLE TO VIEW c. Water/Closets LINK DWELLING AREA --UNABLE TO VIEW d. Tub/Shower UNK DWELLING AREA — UNABLE TOVIEW e. Water Heater UNK PWELLING AREA— UNABLE TO VMW 2. Water Piping UNK DWELUNGAREA --UNA13LETo VIEW 3. Drain, Waste &Vent UNK DWELLINGAREA --UNA13LEToVIEW 4. Sewer/Septic tank UNK DWELLTNGAREA —UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Gas System LTN�I DWELLING AREA —UNABLE TO VIEW C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2, Air Conditioning D SERVED BY EXTENSION CORD 111. PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures D PRDAAR'Y IS OCCUPIED DWELLING 2. Condition of Grounds A_ NIA 3. Other N/A NIA Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES(6) SINCE 2001 SACity Planning Shaze1ALPHA-A01-INSPECTIONS DIVISION4lll Other StufiSCode EoforcemmMang Buildings12012 DANG BLDG12012 303 W Polk St Dang Bldg rnsp Form.doc 02-2004 Rev, City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 09/12/2012 STREET ADDRESS: 318 N 5'r ST HCAD OWNER: PAULINE LEWIS- 310 S BROWNELL ST - LA PORTE, TX 77571-5542 DEED OWNER: PAULTNE LEWIS -NO ADDRESS SHOWN OTHER-. BE"i"I'Y MOORE -3I0 S. BROWNELL ST. -LA PORTE, TX 77571. 5542 LEGAL: BLK 80• LOTS 7 & 8; LAPORTE OCCUPANCY TYPE: Residential .ZONING: -1 NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: ONE FACILITIES AVAILABLE: WATER: Y SEWER: y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 VACANT: OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VIII, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION 'MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard. A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the follo-wing is applicable: A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up, 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ' ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; E 5. 1Vhencvcr, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of Nvbich it is being used; Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form Page 2 6, Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing ' unlawful acts; D�3_7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to.cause sickness or disease; DKL-8. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire-resistivo construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be. a fire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: �1. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; 0_2. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; 0_-,._4, Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION#x: CUPAMARLE--RESID�NT>� ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DANGEROUSBUILDING REGULATIONS. THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND TBE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AS ADOPTED, AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES_93293 AND #3388. USIhTG THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE, IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS, BUT STILL REPAIRABLE. ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THE REPAIR OR _ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH WMM T THE TMIPTABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 82-478, IT IS THEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING EE DEMOLISHED. X S�). 09-13--/:z- BUILDING OFFICIAL'S OFFICE DATE X1117_0 1! le- FaEj OFFICE /RSy�TNL'S X /�I/• & i f�rcn/ �}DATEEj% Y�/%/� F CIIIEF'S OFFICE ��� DATE S.TityPlanningSharAALPHA-1101-INSPECTIONSDIVISIO, MI Other St¢$tCode.Enf)rcementlDangBuildn.-A2012DANQB1DCUO1231$NA St Dang Bldg Insp Ponn-doc 02-20M Rev, Dangerous Buildings inspection Form - page 3 BUILDING EVALUA'CTON CHECKLIST A = Adequate . D = Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNK = Unknown I. STRUCTURA14 COMMENTIEXPLANATION A. Foundation 1. Slab NIA NIA 2. Pier & Beam a. Footings D ROT. UNEVEN SETTLING b. Sills D ROT UNEVEN SETTLING C. Joists D ROT. UNEVEN SETTLING B. Walls 1. Exterior A ROT, MISSITG 2. Interior A NIA C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior D_ DAMAGED b. Exterior D BOARDED UP 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs D ROT. UNEVEN SETTLING 3. Windows D POARD UP 1). Roof 1. Rafters A NIA 2. Deck, Shingles A NIA E. Ceilings 1. Joists UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 2. Ceiling A NIA F. Floors P- - UNP.VEN: ROT G. Other NIA NIA I1. MEHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. Electrical I. Service Entrance & Panel A NIA 2. Wiring D EXPOSED, UNPROTECTED 3. Lights, Switches D HANGING DOWN a. Outlets D - 2-WIRE - 5. Other NIA NIA B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures , a. Sink A NIA b. Lavatories A CIA c. Water/Closets D DISCONNECTED d. Tub/Shower A NIA e. Water Beater D IMPROPER INSTALLATION 2. Water Piping UNK LINABLE TO VIEW 3. Drain, Waste &'Vent UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 4. Sower/Septic tank UNK UNABLE TO VIEW 5. Gas System USN UNABLE TO VIEW C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating UNK STONE VISIBLE 2. Air Conditioning !—kK UNIT ON FLOOR III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Accessory Structures NIA_' NIA 2. Condition of Grounds D WEEDS, DEBRIS 3. Other NIA NIA Comments: CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES (11) SINCE 2001 SACity Planning Share\ALPHA-AOI-INSPECTIONS DIVISIONIA1l Other StuBiCode Enforcement\Dang Buildings12012 DANG BLD02012 318 N Sth St DangB1dg Wp Form.doo 02-2004 Rev. City of La Porte DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION FORM DATE: 09112//2612 STREET ADDRESS: 500 W MAIN ST IICAD OWNER: GILBERT DIAZ — 802 IVY AVE -DEER PARK TX 77536-3220 DEED OWNER: GILBERT DIAZ - 802 IVY - DEER PARK TX 77536 OTHER: NIA LEGAL: ELK 56: LOTS 21-23: LA PORTE OCCUPANCY TYPE: COMMERCIAL ZONING: MSO NON -CONFORMING ISSUES: YES- SETBACKS,• 01-30-12 OBSOLESCENCE LETTER FACILITIES AVAILABLE: `STATER: Y SEWER Y ELECTRICAL: Y GAS: Y NO.OF DWELLING UNITS: NIA V OCCUPIED: AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 82; ARTICLE VET, THE BOARD OF INSPECTION MADE AN INSPECTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY, AND DETERMINED THE BUILDING LOCATED THEREON, IN THEIR OPINION, IS IN FACT A DANGEROUS BUILDING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Sec. 82-473. Declaration of Public Nuisance and Hazard, A. Dangerous or Substandard Buildings or Structures. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable: 1. A building that is vacant, and is not up to current building code standards. These vacant buildings can be either open to trespass or boarded up; 2. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; 3. Whenever any, portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; 4. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting the building; (d) the deterioration, decay, or inadequacy of its foundation, or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; D ,__ ,5. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose of which it.is being used; Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form Page 2 ��.6. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, or flood, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) a public nuisance, (b) a harbor for vagrants, or as to (c) enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts; 7. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement; inadequate light, air, or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the Board to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; 8. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections, or heating apparatus or other cause, is determined by the Board to be afire hazard; B. Dangerous or substandard electrical, plumbing, or mechanical installations. A building or structure shall be considered dangerous or substandard whenever it is determined by the Board, that any or all of the following is applicable., J. Whenever any protective or safety device specified in The Electrical Code and of this title is not provided or is inoperative, defective, dilapidated, or deteriorated so as to threaten to fail or function as originally intended; E� 2. Whenever any installation or any portion tbereof because of (a) dilapidation, deterioration, or decay; (b) faulty construction; (o) obsolescence; (d) inadequate maintenance, which in relation to existing use constitutes a hazard to life, health, property or safety; 3. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof which is damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or any other cause so as to constitute a potential hazard to life, health, property or safety; L3j 4. Whenever any installation or any portion thereof was constructed, installed, altered or maintained in violation of the building code and/or fire code so as to constitute a potential hazard to We, health, property or safety. FINDINGS ,AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION: OPTION #3: {NON-RESIDENTIAL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH TER CITY'S DANGEROUS BUILDING REGULATIONS, THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AS ADOPTED, AMENDED AND ENACTED BY CITY ORDINANCES #3293 AND #3388. USING THE REGULATIONS AND CODE AS ITS GUIDE IT IS THE OPINION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION BOARD THAT THIS BUILDING IS IN FACT DANGEROUS, BUT STILL REPAR BLE. ALL RBOUMD REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF LA PORTE CODES AND ORDINANCES, IF THE REPAIR OR ALTERATION ORDER IS NOT COMPLIED WITH [tiITHIN THE TDiffFABLE SET OUT IN ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 82-478 IT IS TIIEN THE OPINION OF THIS BOARD THAT TIES BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED. x �Y n9-J3 BUILDING OFFICIAL`S OFFICE DATE X F HAI. OPFICE DATE 171 CHIEFS OFFICE BATE SACityPlanningShaieIALYHA-ROIJNSPECTIONSDIWSIONAII Other StufltCodeEnforcementlDangBuildings12012DAN' BLDCr'12012 504w Main St Dang Bldg Insp Yorm.doc 02 2004 Rev. Dangerous Buildings Inspection Form page 3 A = Adequate I. STRUCTURAL A. Foundation 1. Slab 2. Pier & Beam a. Footings b. Sills c. Joists B. Walls 1. Exterior 2. Interior C. Means of Egress 1. Doors a. Interior b. Exterior 2. Porches, Steps, Stairs 3. Windows D. Roof I. Rafters 2. Deck, Shingles E. Ceilings 1, Joists 2, Ceiling F. Floors G. Other II. MEHCANICAL SYSTEMS A. EIectrical 1. Service Entrance & Panel 2. Wiring 3. Lights, Switches 4. Outlets 5. Other B. Plumbing 1. Fixtures a. Sink b. Lavatories c. Water/Closets d. Tub/Shower e. Water Heater 2. Water Piping 3. Drain, Waste & Vent 4. Sewer/Septic tank 5. Gas System C. Heating & A/C 1. Heating 2. Air Conditioning III. PROPERTY CONDITIONS BUILDING EVALUATION CHECKLIST A NIA NIA TT/A P— D 1 A D NIA A D N/A D NIA D D D D_ NIA D D_ D_ NIA NIA D D UNK UNK UNK UNK D - Deficient NIA = Not Applicable UNK = Unknown COMMENT / EXPLANATION HOLES. ROT ROT TERrMITE DAMAGE MISSING - WARPED 4ISSING; BROKEN FLAT ROOF ROT• IMPROPER CUTS ON FRAWNG NO SHEETROCK OR CEILING TILE FLOOR TILES MISSING PANEL CONDUIT DISCONNECTED: BREAKERS BROKEN HANGING DOWN DOES NOT MEET ADA DOES NOT MEET ADA DOES NOT MEET ADA N/A NONE EXTERIOR DAMAGED BROKEN PIPE; MISSING CLEAN -OUT UNABLE TO VIEW UNABLE TO VIEW UNABLE TO VIEW UNABLE TO VIEW 1. Accessory Structures D HOLES 1N WALL• ROT 2. Condition of Grounds D WEEDS: DEBRIS 3. Other N/A NIA Comments: OBSOLENCE OF STRUCTURE LETTER TO OWNER 1-30-12; NEVER APPEALED; CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES (25) SINCE 2000 S:ICity Planning ShareIALPHA-I1OMNSPECTIONS DIVNIGN1All Other Scu8lCode Enforcemen(Mang Buildings12012 FANG BLDGM12 500 W Main St Dang Bldg Insp Form.doc 02 2004 Rev. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: October 8, 2012 Requested By: Stephen L. Barr Department: Parks & Recreation Report: X Resolution: Ordinance Attachments: Lomax Arena Scenarios Attachments: Change Order 41 Attachments: Revised Change Order 41 Attachments: Termination Agreement Appropriation Source of Funds: Fund 015 Acct Number: 015-9892-622-1100 Amount Budgeted: 1,030,000 Requested: SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION On July 23rd the City Council awarded the Lomax Arena Roof Replacement and Alternate 1 Extensions to Civil Concepts Construction, LLC in the amount of $455,499. This price did not include the electrical component, as it was included in the pavilion buildings portion of the bid that was not awarded. At the August 27 Council meeting, staff presented three options for Council consideration relative to adding the electrical component. The item was tabled with a request for additional information, clarification of the project parameters, and all options available for additional consideration. The attached report outlines seven separate scenarios that have been identified as viable options at this point in the process, for moving forward with the repair/reconstruction of the Lomax Arena. Civil Concepts has formally agreed that if the Council chooses to pursue other scenarios for constructing or repairing the Lomax Arena Complex, it (Civil Concepts) will relinquish any contract rights to the proj ect. Staff is seeking Council direction on the approach and scope for the project. Action Required by Council: Any direction desired by Council. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date O O O O O m O O m w r^^^II O O O O O N O O N�T N ro O O O O O m O O Ql l0 u I _0 O m m O m O m N m it'ri c 0)m r, �-i m 0 rl -i in u v aco , m v v a) v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} to vl °I'll D v ° > O O o o 0 o m o O O O O O O O O O m w 5 a, a) u -O W O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O N Ol + 7 (1) O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O M —1 41 GO � ++ ^—� a) (c O m m O m O m m O N O m O m M m VWp m m n n .--I m O Il O m n wm N Il I'h a-� vi �O rl O 7 V1 (1) OO f0 'V1 CL _ = 3 v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v) v). ^II'll c c O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ORo x fO + N r`p - O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O m + o vt oo C: d O Lr O O O m m O N O m O qT m a-4 I, it* •� Ol N m r-I O Il O m n w m N Ln qT it O o_0 D u C70m OO O O V). v} v} v} v} v} v} IA- IA- IA- IA- IA- IA- Vf IA. I'll O_ M N O' O a0 '^ m '� 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o Ln Ln O O. O O O O O O O O O O X O m O qT m m O N O m O qT m m qT m J a) X a/ a/ pq , rl N ci m n O m n w m N W qT 0 Q a) E s v c' H +�+ vi 3 a) f0 p o a0 — o -O c ,' 'us a -I O � +� ac° v � -o c + D v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} of v} of o > v v E aa)) o O o o 0 o m O O O O o o m w-i a) —— O 0 (? O O O O O N O O O O O O N m N O 00.0 -O = O O O O O O G O O O O O O G m l!1 O: :2 MC N O 4 > ? O m m O m m m O m m a -I Lfl I, O E n n ci Ol Il O w N 0 a)a) i v Q 0: ci m O f0 al Op 6 VI +D+ C .E N,N O _ o 7 Q '� = E v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} i? v} i? �1 v a) * L v co O O Il m o O N qT W y, N _ ° C ° o c 0 c4 ' o rn rn o 0 qT eq > o v ° m o 0000 Ln f cam, o 'X v" t v - o w m qT o v I' V O -O t U v�i a- i [41 Il 00 Ol Ol w M 4 0 d a/ a/ �^ N -1 N m co O /\ VEO p W p o a, p_ v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} v} m CL J c �i c o c o m o o m m �o a) �_ o a, : •o u a, Q o a N ro �n �n O — O m Il N O O m m co 'O v v v v* o Cf, O in � rn O O a m-1 c ° 4Lz E u v `0 o Ln Ln m o 0 of o m c •Q ^ `� 3 ca w rl rn rn w m� � 00 O a0 0 N N O " +�+ i G, ci N c-I m Ql N V t u o c v — c a U t O c v u5 ri ti) O N w V Q -6 Q = O — -6 > a) f0 ^—� ate., — 7 it > N z i 00 •N V N v N o L O a)go c > °0 0> w w f0 N 'O GO i �n 'O a'' a5 )p c n c E a) a a' 2 u C Z 2 Z Q Q (1x) w Q io � ro O +_ u _ (7 J " a) in +O N p W t ao v u p i C O E i U cam.) p a) Z c v *a) D C: O p u m 0 C O 7 N m x +�.' a0 v Q U J =' •y ++ U ++ N N\ a/ U +c+ >• N U C O Q m u 0 W LL (7 - S +O+ ._ a N 3 C V) c� u ao 3 E 00 Z s u a�i E * a) c c v Q o c 3 v� E c> > E ;; c— D N 0 i O 00 N Q o— 0 O V n a0 � ao ,O Q a0 N Q° O ow L bD o M O V U N Q a) c v -p .� �_ Q E pX ro c •� a) N O c U 0 m N X � C i) i1 ~ O f m 7 a X w w 0 ao a) aca + m y + ' c ' W c o °' ao o c Q o p °/ cam.) 'O O '6 > X a) a0 .2 [O 7 N '6 u a) O_ d p +' OC X •+�—+ 4 U O 7 N N C -p +L+ p f0 OO .LZ f0 O E U f0 C `o (J o (7 °c c c v H v v v v c N —> v a) o -O O Q V VI Z Q Z m Q Q V m S (J ca m Q d J m U m ci N m m l0 I� 00 Ol O �--i N m m 'D I" colO) U E v CIVIL CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION LLC CHANGE ORDER REQUEST CHANGE ORDER NO.. I DATE: 08/09/12 LOCATION: Lomax Park Improvements CT('Y PROJ NO: 12024 You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications INCIZEASE/(DECREASE:) IN CONTRACT Item No. Description Amount ADD: I . Electrical Lighting $95,925.17 1 600 Amp overhead service as per drawings 2 4" Communication conduits as per drawings 1 400 Amp feeder (parallel 2 1/2" conduit with 3 — 3/0 THI-1N and l — 1/0 THFIN each) in substitute for Illan call of I —4" with 600 MLM (V.E.) I Panel DP as per drawings I Panel LC as per drawings 72 T-5 Six lamp E'-Bay fixtures With 25' Candles at ground level All 11CW COMILllt and wiring at arena 1 Ice machine circuit per Receptacles on I-beam columns Emergency lighting as required Demo of existing lights, Cpn(lUlt, cOMIUCt1o118and electrical service ADD Subtotal : $95,925.17 DELETE: € Roof Extension Replace e11d lean-to structrlrc with 25' full height Building Extension on each end. Process incd�ldes installation of ciblit (8) concrete footings, four (4) on each end, exterior colunnl, rafter, perlings, and roof panels. (11,1 a,221 .00) DELETE Subtotal : ($14,221.00) Scope and justification: Total Change Order Amount: $81,704.17 Original Contract Price $455,499.00 Previous Change Orders $0,00 Total Net Increase/Decrease $81,704.17 New Contract Total $537,203.17 Civil Concepts Construction LLC Date City of LaPorte Date CIVIL CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION LLC CHANGE ORDER REQUEST CHANGE ORDER NO.: 1 Revised DATE: 08/27/12 LOCATION: Lomax Park Improvements CITY PROD NO: 12024 You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications Item No. Item Desci tion Amount ADD I Electrical LightinL, $93,925.00 1 600 Amp overhead service as per drawings 2 4" Communication conduits as per drawings 1 400 Amp feeder (parallel 2 1/2" conduit with 3 — 3/0 TIJHN and I — 1/0 THI-IN each) in substitute for plan call of 1 -- 4" with 600 MLM (V.E.) I Panel DP as per drawings I Panel LC as per drawings 72 T-5 Six lamp l=-Bay fixtures with 25' candles at ground level All new conduit and wiring at arena 1 Ice machine circuit per Receptacles on I-beam columns Emergency lighting as required Demo of existing lights, conduit, conductions and electrical service 2 Roof Replacement Install 24 gage metal sheeting in place of existing 26 gage sheeting onto the existing Arena roof and $21,400.00 increase the screw pattern to a tighter tolerance. Requirement for 120 MPH wind. Add Subtotal $115,325.00 Total Change Order Amount: $115,325.00 Original Contract Price $265,557.00 Previous Change Orders $0.00 Total Net Increase/Decrease $115,325.00 New Contract Total $380 882.00 Civil Concepts Construction LLC City of La Porte Date Date CONTRACT TERMINATION AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE The City of LaPorte, Texas and Civil Concepts Construction, LLC hereby mutually agree to the rescission and termination of the construction contract entered into between the parties by virtue of La Porte's acceptance of Civil Concept Construction, LLC's bid by the La Porte City Council on July 23, 2012, and which construction contract relates to improvements to the Lomax Arena in La Porte, Texas. In consideration of each party's agreement to rescission and termination of the said construction contract, both La Porte, Texas and Civil Concepts Construction, LLC agree to fiilly release and hold harmless the other party from any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, and liabilities, including attorney's fees, which could be asserted against the other party, arising directly or indirectly from any activities conducted or services performed in connection with said construction contract. This agreement shall be inunediately effective upon its execution by both parties. Civil Concepts Construction, LLC Richard W. Cansler, President Date City of La Porte, Texas Corby Alexander, City Manager Date Council Agenda Item September 24, 2012 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS (a) La Porte Development Corporation Board Meeting, Monday, October 22, 2012 (b) City Council Meeting, Monday, October 22, 2012 (c) City Council Meeting, Monday, November 12, 2012 (d) Thanksgiving Holidays — Thursday, November 22, 2012, and Friday, November 23, 2012 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information or existing policies — Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Mosteit, Clausen, Martin, Moser and Mayor Rigby. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government Code, including, but not limited to, the following: Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(A) — Pending or Contemplated Litigation — State vs. Port of Houston - Sound Mediation Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(A) — Pending or Contemplated Litigation — Tammy Cooper vs. City of La Porte 12. RECONVENE into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive session. *********************************************************************************** Council Agenda Item October 8, 2012 13. ADJOURN ***********************************************************************************