HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-23-15 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
7.PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ASSOCIATED ORDINANCESPUBLIC HEARINGS AND ASSOCIATED ORDINANCES
Public Hearing to receive comments regarding recommendations by the La Porte Planning Public Hearing to receive comments regarding recommendations by the La Porte Planning
(a)
and Zoning Commission to approve Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14and Zoning Commission to approve Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14-91000003,
to allow construction of an offto allow construction of an offsite parking lot at the southeast corner of S. 16th Street and W. site parking lot at the southeast corner of S. 16th
Street and W.
C Street in a General Commercial (GC) District C Street in a General Commercial (GC) District -- E. Ensey E. Ensey
Consider approval or other action regarding Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14Consider approval or other action regarding Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14-
(b)
91000003, for the purpose of developing an off91000003, for the purpose of developing an offsite parking lot for Medders Construction at site parking lot for Medders Construction at
the southeast corner of S. 16th Street and W. C Street in a General Commercial (GC) the southeast corner of S. 16th Street and W. C Street in a General Commercial (GC)
District District -- E. Ensey E. Ensey
8.DISCUSSION OR OTHER ACTIONDISCUSSION OR OTHER ACTION
Discussion or other action regarding the 3rd Street Paving Project Discussion or other action regarding the 3rd Street Paving Project -- Councilmembers Councilmembers
(a)
Zemanek, Earp and KaminskiZemanek, Earp and Kaminski
Discussion or other action regarding furnishing effluent water to Enterprise Products Discussion or other action regarding furnishing effluent water to Enterprise Products - C.
(b)
AlexanderAlexander
9.REPORTSREPORTS
Receive report of the La Porte Development Corporation Board Receive report of the La Porte Development Corporation Board -- Councilmember Engelken Councilmember Engelken
(a)
10.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTSADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
La Porte Development Corporation Board Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015La Porte Development Corporation Board Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015
City Council Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015City Council Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015
City Council Meeting, Monday, March 23, 2015City Council Meeting, Monday, March 23, 2015
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, Thursday, March 19, 2015Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, Thursday, March 19, 2015
Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Thursday, March 26, 2015Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Thursday, March 26, 2015
Citizens Forum on Code Enforcement for the Northside Neighborhood, Tuesday, March 31, Citizens Forum on Code Enforcement for the Northside Neighborhood, Tuesday, March 31,
20152015
regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community
11.COUNCIL COMMENTSCOUNCIL COMMENTS
members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific
factual information
or existing policies or existing policies Councilmembers Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, Martin, Moser, Councilmembers Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, Martin,
Moser,
Kaminski and Mayor RigbyKaminski and Mayor Rigby
12.EXECUTIVE SESSIONEXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should
the need
arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas
Government
Code, in accordance with the authority contained in:Code, in accordance with the authority contained in:
Deliberation concerning the appointment, Deliberation concerning the appointment,
Texas Government Code, Section 551.074Texas Government Code, Section 551.074
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee: employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public
officer or employee:
Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary and Corby Alexander, City ManagerPatrice Fogarty, City Secretary and Corby Alexander, City Manager
into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive
13.RECONVENERECONVENE
session. session.
14.ADJOURNADJOURN
The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should
the need The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda
item should the need
arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas
Government
Code (the Texas open meetings laws).Code (the Texas open meetings laws).
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte
will provide for reasonable
accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees, requests should be received accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees,
requests should be received
24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019.24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019.
CERTIFICATIONCERTIFICATION
I certify that a copy of the February 23, 2015, agenda of items to be considered by the City Council was posted on the City I certify that a copy of the February 23, 2015, agenda of
items to be considered by the City Council was posted on the City
Hall bulletin board on February 17, 2015.Hall bulletin board on February 17, 2015.
Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item
February 23, 2015 February 23, 2015
1.CALL TO ORDERCALL TO ORDER
The invocation will be given by Dee Spears, Fairmont Park Church.The invocation will be given by Dee Spears, Fairmont Park Church.
2.INVOCATIONINVOCATION
The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember John The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember John
3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Zemanek.Zemanek.
4.PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONSPRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONS
Recognitions Recognitions -- Citizens Certificate of Merit Citizens Certificate of Merit -- Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby
(a)
(Limited to five minutes per person.) (Limited to five minutes per person.)
5.PUBLIC COMMENTSPUBLIC COMMENTS
****************************************************************** ******************************************************************
01/28/2015
To:
From: John Krueger (Sgt. LPPD)
Re: Recommendation for citizen recognition
To whom it may concern:
th
On January 24, the La Porte community experienced the unfortunate loss of life as a result of a motor
vehicle accident along Fairmont Parkway. However, among the devastation, there were acts of bravery and
heroism for which both I and LPPD Reconstructionist Officer Bennie Boles hereby make a formal request
for recognition. Details are as follows:
On January 24 th, 2015, a severe motor vehicle accident occurred at around 10 a.m., near the intersection of
Fairmont Parkway at Canada Rd. which ultimately resulted in the death of one of the vehicle drivers.
Nevertheless, it should be recognized that, in the immediate aftermath of the crash, one of the vehicles
involved caught fire near the trunk area due to a ruptured fuel system. Contract construction workers aiding
Sonoco service station staff near the intersection witnessed the event and immediately took action. The
following eight men, Javier Hernandez; Jonathan Ruiz; Cristian Garcia; Elias Hernandez; Jose Hernandez;
Justin Martinez; and Richard Cantu each secured fire extinguishers from the Sonoco job site and rushed to
the vehicle to smother the fire. At the same time, their co-worker Carlos Moreno looked inside of the
vehicle and observed a 4 year-old boy secured in a safety seat, yet pinned inside of the vehicle. As the eight
brave men extinguished the fire, Moreno extracted the boy without any concern for his own personal safety.
Had the nine men hesitated, or failed to act, the burning vehicle certainly would have evolved into a major
fire, and, worse, the 4 year old boy would have lost his life. It is for this reason that these brave men are
receiving the Citizens Certificate of Merit.
Sincerely,
John Krueger
Sergeant
La Porte Police Department
Steve Gillett, 2601 S. Broadway #27, addressed Council in regards to the Industrial Waste
surcharge fee and advised the surcharge is not a tax to generate revenue but to ensure compliance
with the ordinance and an incentive to reduce grease and oil in the collection and treatment system.
Mr. Gillett informed the city is currently under an administrative order with Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to reduce overflow and to have an Industrial Waste Ordinance. In
addition, Mr. Gillett advised the Waste Water Treatment Plant will be affected due to the design
criteria being a 200 Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD).
Steve Coycault, Sr., 4315 Maidenhead Dr., addressed Council and asked them to consider freezing
City taxes for the disabled and seniors 65 and older.
Russell Ybarra, 2601 Underwood (Gringo’s Mexican Kitchen), addressed Council and advised the
City of La Porte is the only city that classifies a restaurant as an industrial user and requested the
City to consider reducing the surcharge by 50% and require all food establishments to mandate a
quarterly grease pumping. Mr. Ybarra also informed he doesn’t feel the ordinance is fair to include
restaurants and nursing homes but not the school district.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
(All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an
item be removed and considered separately.)
(a)
Consider approval or other action regarding the minutes of the City Council Meeting held on
January 26, 2015 – P. Fogarty
(b)
Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with
Port of Houston Authority for the provision of emergency medical services by the City of
La Porte EMS for Barbour’s Cut Terminal – P. Fogarty
(c)
Consider approval or other action to renew the 2013 contract with North Houston Pole Line
for sanitary sewer repair, replacement and/or rehabilitation with an approved allocation of
$175,000.00 – D. Mick
(d)
Consider approval or other action awarding Vehicle Replacement for Fiscal Year 2014-2015
to Brookside Equipment through Texas BuyBoard and rescinding the approval at the
January 12, 2015 City Council meeting for purchase of Golf Course and Parks equipment
through HGAC – D. Mick
(e)
Consider approval or other action regarding Ordinance 2007-IDA-141, authorizing execution
of an Industrial District Agreement between the City of La Porte and Almondwater LLC. – K.
Powell
(f)
Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute a Water Service
Agreement and a Sanitary Service Agreement with Almondwater LLC. – T. Tietjens
Regarding Item c, Councilmember Earp questioned how much was actually billed on the last
contract and if they are required to obtain a new bond. Public Works Director Dave Mick responded
$182,000 into the contingency and, yes, they are required to get new bonds.
Regarding Item d, Councilmember Martin questioned if the gator ATV truck is a new vehicle. Mr.
Mick responded yes.
28
Page of
February 9, 2015, Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Engelken moved to approve the Consent Agenda pursuant to staff
MOTION PASSED.
recommendations. Councilmember Leonard seconded.
Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Clausen, Zemanek, Moser,
Leonard, Engelken, Martin, Kaminski and Earp
Nays: None
Absent: None
Ordinance 2015-3569:
Prior to council action, Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins read the caption of AN
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION BY THE CITY OF LA PORTE OF AN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
AGREEMENT WITH ALMONDWATER LLC., A TEXAS CORPORATION FOR THE TERM COMMENCING
JANUARY 1, 2008, AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2019; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS
RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ASSOCIATED ORDINANCES
(a)
Public hearing to receive comments regarding recommendations by the Planning and Zoning
Commission to approve Rezone Request #14-9200000, rezoning property from split Low
Density Residential (R-1) and General Commercial (GC), to exclusively General Commercial
(GC) for a 1.6611 tract of land located at the southeast corner of Spencer Highway and Canada
Road – E. Ensey
The public hearing was opened at 6:40 p.m.
City Planner Eric Ensey presented a summary.
Councilmember Earp questioned how has the developer agreed to work with the property owners at
3203 Canada Road to mitigate their concerns. Mr. Ensey responded the city will review the site
plans and ensure the developer is in compliance with the code provisions which are property owner
concerns.
There being no input from the public, the public hearing closed at 6:43 p.m.
(b)
Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 106 Zoning of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of La Porte by changing the zoning classification from split Low
Density Residential (R-1) and General Commercial (GC) to exclusively General Commercial
(GC) for a 1.6611 tract of land located at the southeast corner of Spencer Highway and Canada
Road – E. Ensey
Councilmember Engelken moved to approve an Ordinance amending Chapter 106 Zoning of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of La Porte by changing the zoning classification from split Low
Density Residential (R-1) and General Commercial (GC) to exclusively General Commercial (GC)
for a 1.6611 tract of land located at the southeast corner of Spencer Highway and Canada Road.
MOTION PASSED.
Councilmember Kaminski seconded.
Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Clausen, Zemanek, Engelken,
Kaminski, Moser, Leonard, Earp and Martin
Nays: None
Absent: None
Ordinance 2015-3570:
Prior to council action, Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins read the caption of AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 106 “ZONING” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LA
PORTE BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM SPLIT LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL(R-1) AND
GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) TO EXCLUSIVELY GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC), FOR A 1.6611 ACRE TRACT
OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
38
Page of
February 9, 2015, Council Meeting Minutes
8. DISCUSSION OR OTHER ACTION
(a)
Discussion or other action regarding a request by Boone Exploration, Inc., for relief from 300’
distance requirement from any dwelling or water well for a proposed Geophysical Mineral
Exploration and Testing Permit – T. Tietjens
Planning and Development Director Tim Tietjens presented a summary; and Hoyt O’Neal with
Boone Exploration and Hal Bozeman with Etoco, L.P., provided a presentation.
Councilmember Earp questioned would there be any damages from testing. Mr. O’Neal advised it
is very minimal – maybe cause some potholes – but no broken slabs. Councilmember Earp
commented it seems like a lot of risk.
Councilmember Zemanek questioned which company was requesting the proposed Geophysical
Mineral Exploration and Testing Permit and for what reason. Mr. O’Neal responded Boone
Exploration is contracted to conduct the seismic survey through Etoco L.P.; and they are exploring
their mineral options. Councilmember Zemanek asked if the company has any idea which streets
will be tested in the Lomax area. Mr. O’Neal responded no, the company is in the early stages and
is trying to get the buffers reduced. Mr. O’Neal also advised the company can adjust accordingly to
whatever needs to be done.
Councilmember Clausen questioned if the testing is conducted on streets. Mr. O’Neal responded
yes, they try to stick to the main roads to avoid tearing up yards.
Councilmember Martin questioned the type of minerals the company is trying to find. Mr. O’Neal
responded once the data is set, it will be sent to the processor to determine if there is oil or natural
gas. Councilmember Martin then questioned at what depth will the reservoirs be determined.
Mr. O’Neal responded up to 18,000 feet, depending on the shot points and locations.
Councilmember Martin asked what type of drilling will take place. Hal Bozeman, Land Manager
with Etoco, L.P., advised the type of drilling is determined by the seismic testing; and 2-3 acres are
needed for drilling, and 1 acre for the production site.
Hoyt O’Neal advised they are in the early stages; and if drilling were to take place, it will be 6-9
months later.
Brady Payne with VibraTech advised they will be with Boone Exploration during the surveying to
keep them in the safe zone.
Councilmember Zemanek commented he wants to protect the homeowners and is against the
entire process.
Mayor Rigby questioned if a survey was conducted 30 years ago, can a new survey show changes
today. Mr. O’Neal responded the technology has changed since then and line spacing could have
been off and today it is a more precise technology.
Councilmember Earp moved to deny relief from the 300-foot distance requirement from any
dwelling or water well for a proposed Geophysical Mineral Exploration and Testing Permit.
MOTION PASSED.
Councilmember Engelken seconded.
Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Clausen, Zemanek, Engelken,
Kaminski, Moser, Leonard, Earp and Martin
Nays: None
Absent: None
48
Page of
February 9, 2015, Council Meeting Minutes
(b)
Discussion or other action regarding the surcharge fee component of the City of La Porte
Industrial Waste Ordinance (This item was tabled at the January 12, 2015 meeting) – D. Mick
Public Works Director Dave Mick presented a summary.
Councilmember Zemanek requested a breakdown for the program's approximate cost of $95,000 a
year. Public Works Director Dave Mick responded it is approximately $82,000 in salary and
benefits. Councilmember Zemanek asked what other cities are doing. Mr. Mick responded he
does not know if other cities have a requirement like the City of La Porte for significant industrial
users that is not a mandate from Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Mr. Mick
advised the user group is prompting the cost of the program. Councilmember Zemanek asked if Mr.
Mick still thinks that reducing the formula by 50% will satisfy the requirements. Public Works
Director Dave Mick responded he does not have a problem reducing the formula by 50%.
Councilmember Zemanek asked if the City requires restaurants to pump their grease traps on a
regular basis. Mr. Mick responded yes, but they are not required to pump the grease traps four
times a year. Councilmember Zemanek asked if Mr. Ybarra emptied his grease traps more than
quarterly will alleviate his situation of a high surcharge. Mr. Mick responded he recalls Mr. Ybarra's
cost issue being a biological oxygen demand (BOD) loading issue and not a grease issue.
Councilmember Clausen asked if the City required everyone to pump grease traps quarterly, as
suggested by Mr. Ybarra, will it reduce the total BOD going to the Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Mr. Mick responded he is not sure because more than 2/3 of the restaurants are pumping grease
traps quarterly.
Councilmember Leonard commented he does not believe the current penalty fee is fair and taking a
measurement once a year is not an accurate picture of what a business is doing and the amount of
waste that is going through the system. Councilmember Leonard then suggested to reduce the cost
and put into effect a structure for testing and pumping grease traps.
Councilmember Engelken commented it will be a good idea to have Staff validate all of the
situations and see what other cities are doing and take more time to evaluate the scope.
Councilmember Martin commented he would like more information on the effect of reducing the
surcharge fee will have on the current system before making a decision.
Councilmember Moser questioned if grease actually is the cause for a high BOD. Public Works
Director Dave Mick responded liquids without grease going down a drain can still have a high BOD.
Councilmember Moser commented there are a lot of questions to be answered before he can make
a decision.
Councilmember Earp asked if there is an impact on the water system at this time with everything
that is going to the Waste Water Treatment Plant. Mr. Mike responded yes, and the BOD loading
rates have been going down in the last few years and may be contributed to the current ordinance.
Councilmember Zemanek asked if the City is near capacity at the Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Mr. Mick responded no.
Mayor Rigby advised City Council the item was placed on the agenda for discussion and to give
Staff direction for a future meeting and not to change the existing ordinance. Mayor Rigby asked if
any change for the restaurants will also apply to truck washes. Mr. Mick responded it would apply to
industrial users and not 'significant industrial users' which truck washes fall under. Mayor Rigby
asked Mr. Mick if he recalls when the item was first discussed and during Industrial Waste Inspector
Pam Kroupa’s comments regarding Gringo’s Kitchen, she advised when the surcharges were
issued, she advised the charges could be lowered if recommendations were undertaken by the
restaurant. Ms. Kroupa advised the manager informed her they would pay the surcharges. Mr. Mick
responded no corrective action has been taken, and he does recall the conversation. Mayor Rigby
asked if the testing the City does is conducted by a contractor. Mr. Mick responded yes the testing
58
Page of
February 9, 2015, Council Meeting Minutes
is done by a vendor. Mayor Rigby advised cost information for increasing the number of times
testing should be done a year needs to be available the next time discussed. Mayor Rigby
commented the concern is if the surcharge is reduced or eliminated, will the treatment plant be at
risk in the future. Mr. Mick responded it is possible; but future tests results would have to be
compared to previous test results in order to make the determination. Mayor Rigby asked if the
surcharges were reduced and BOD’s continue to rise and concern TCEQ, how easy it will be for the
City to revert back to the original program. Mr. Mick responded the City would have enough
information from the test results to justify going back to the old rates.
Councilmember Engelken moved to postpone the item pending additional information from Staff on
MOTION PASSED.
recommendations moving forward. Councilmember Zemanek seconded.
Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Clausen, Zemanek, Engelken,
Kaminski, Moser, Leonard, Earp and Martin
Nays: None
Absent: None
9. Reports
(a)
Receive report of La Porte Development Corporation Boar – Councilmember Engelken
Councilmember Engelken provided a report from the La Porte Development Corporation Board
meeting held prior to this meeting and advised the next meeting will be held on February 23, 2015.
(b)
Receive 2014 City of La Porte Police Department Racial Profiling Report – K. Adcox
Police Chief Ken Adcox provided the City of La Porte Police Department Racial Profiling Report and
advised there were no complaints of racial profiling.
Councilmember Zemanek commented the City of La Porte Police Department is doing an excellent
job.
There were no questions.
(c)
Receive Planning Department Audit Report – T. Tietjens
Planning and Development Director Tim Tietjens provided a report and informed all immediate and
short term goals are done and 10 of 17 long term goals are done.
Councilmember Martin asked if any of the quarterly forums with citizens and homeowners groups
have been conducted. Planning and Development Director Tim Tietjens advised a map has been
generated for code enforcement, and the first quarterly meeting will be held in March.
Councilmember Martin requested City Council receive a copy of the Code Enforcement Map.
Mr. Tietjens advised he will send it in the next couple of days.
(d)
Receive Drainage Report – B. Eng
City Engineer/Inspection Service Manager Bob Eng was present to accept questions.
Councilmember Moser questioned the delay on the D Street Connector. Mr. Eng informed it is
being advertised and then a pre-bid meeting will be held.
Councilmember Martin asked when was the last time the Drainage Committee met. Mr. Eng
responded not since he became employed at the City; and he will get with the City Secretary’s
Office to set up a meeting if the committee would like to meet.
10. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
There were no Administrative Reports
68
Page of
February 9, 2015, Council Meeting Minutes
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community
members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual
information or existing policies– Councilmembers Moser, Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken,
Earp, Clausen, Martin and Mayor Rigby.
Councilmembers Kaminski, Leonard, Earp, and Clausen congratulated Charlene Fox, Brian
Sterling, and Cherell Daeumer for receiving awards and James Stark on his retirement;
Councilmember Zemanek congratulated Charlene Fox, Brian Sterling, and Cherell Daeumer for
receiving awards and James Stark on his retirement; reminded everyone of the Soul Food Cook-Off
this coming Friday and congratulated Councilmember Earp on the birth of his first grandchild;
Councilmember Engelken congratulated Charlene Fox, Brian Sterling, and Cherell Daeumer for
receiving awards and James Stark on his retirement, and also congratulated Councilmember Earp
on the birth of his first grandchild; Councilmember Martin congratulated Charlene Fox, Brian
Sterling, and Cherell Daeumer for receiving awards and James Stark on his retirement; thanked
Staff for their presentations tonight and reminded everyone of Valentine’s Day this coming
Saturday; Councilmember Moser congratulated Charlene Fox, Brian Sterling, and Cherell Daeumer
for receiving awards and James Stark on his retirement and reminded everyone of the Soul Food
Cook-Off this coming Friday; and Mayor Rigby recognized retired Reserve Officers, Pat O’Connor;
Johnny Land and retired Police Officer Donna O’Connor at the meeting; recognized Charlene Fox,
Brian Sterling, and Cherell Daeumer for receiving awards and James Stark on his retirement; and
advised City Manager Corby Alexander and Finance Director Michael Dolby have been looking at
into the seniors' tax freeze; and Council is waiting on the legislative session and not ignoring the
issue.
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item
should the need arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the
Texas Government Code, including, but not limited to, the following:
Texas Government Code, Section 551.074 –
Deliberation concerning the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or
employee: Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary and Corby Alexander, City Manager.
Texas Government Code, Section 551.071 (1) (A) –
Consultation with City Attorney: Pending or
Contemplated Litigation – Meet with City Attorney to discuss contract with 65 La Porte, Ltd.
City Council recessed the regular Council meeting to convene an executive session at 8:12 p.m. to
meet with the City Attorney and then with Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, and Corby Alexander,
City Manager.
13. RECONVENE
into regular session and consider action, if any on item(s) discussed in executive
session.
Council reconvened into the regular Council meeting at 9:03 p.m.
Regarding the executive session pertaining to Section 551.074, for the deliberation concerning the
appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public
officer or employee: Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary and Corby Alexander, City Manager, Mayor
Rigby advised there were discrepancies on the evaluation number totals that need to be remedied
before meeting for the evaluations.
Regarding the executive session pertaining to Section 551.071 (1) (A) – Consultation with City
Attorney: Pending or Contemplated Litigation – Meet with City Attorney to discuss contract with 65
La Porte, Ltd.
78
Page of
February 9, 2015, Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Engelken moved to direct Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins to send a demand
letter requiring 65 La Porte, Ltd., to meet the requirements of the memorandum of understanding.
MOTION PASSED.
Councilmember Zemanek seconded.
Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Moser, Leonard, Martin,
Clausen, Kaminski, Engelken, Zemanek, and Earp
Nays: None
Absent: None
14. ADJOURN
There being no further business, Councilmember Engelken moved to adjourn the meeting at
9:05 p.m.
_______________________________
Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary
Passed and approved on February 23, 2015.
________________________________
Mayor Louis R. Rigby
88
Page of
February 9, 2015, Council Meeting Minutes
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
N/A N/A
Patrice Fogarty Patrice Fogarty Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Requested By:
N/A N/A
City Secretary's Office City Secretary's Office Account Number:Account Number:
Department:
N/A N/A
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
N/A N/A
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
1. TML White Paper1. TML White Paper
2. Language of SB 3432. Language of SB 343
3. TML Letter to Senator Huffines3. TML Letter to Senator Huffines
4. Resolution in opposition to SB 3434. Resolution in opposition to SB 343
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
Regarding the current legislative session, Senator Don Huffines (Dallas area) filed Senate Bill 343. Senate Bill Regarding the current legislative session, Senator Don Huffines (Dallas
area) filed Senate Bill 343. Senate Bill
343 would have the effect of turning home rule cities into general law cities. 343 would have the effect of turning home rule cities into general law cities.
This bill absolutely erodes the powers of a home rule municipality to adopt ordinances affecting the City's ability to This bill absolutely erodes the powers of a home rule municipality
to adopt ordinances affecting the City's ability to
govern its citizens. Under the bill, city voters and locallygovern its citizens. Under the bill, city voters and locally--elected officials would have to get the state legislature's
elected officials would have to get the state legislature's
permission to enact any local ordinance, rule, or regulation.permission to enact any local ordinance, rule, or regulation.
The Texas Municipal League has written to Senator Huffines and also published a white paper regarding this bill. The Texas Municipal League has written to Senator Huffines and also
published a white paper regarding this bill.
Both are attached for review. Both are attached for review.
Should Council adopt this Resolution, a copy will be sent to all elected representatives for the City and to Senator Should Council adopt this Resolution, a copy will be sent to all
elected representatives for the City and to Senator Should Council adopt this Resolution, a copy will be sent to all elected representatives for the City and to Senator Should Council
adopt this Resolution, a copy will be sent to all elected representatives for the City and to Senator
Huffines.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
Consider approval or other action of a Resolution opposing Senate Bill 343. Consider approval or other action of a Resolution opposing Senate Bill 343.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
S.B. 343
Abolish Local Control. Centralize Power in Austin.
Just like New York.
S.B. 343 would totally upend the relationship between Texas cities and state
government, making Texas like the State of New York. City voters and locally-
elected
ordinance.
In 1868, a federal judge named Dillon issued a ruling that cities can do only what their state
government expressly authorizes them to do. The State of New York follows Rule, and
the way to go and in 1912 adopted a constitutional amendment affirming
local decision making.
The Texas Constitution (in Article XI, Section 5) authorizes cities over 5,000 population to adopt
by election a home rule charter. The charter grants the citizens of that city the power of self-
government. Over 350 Texas cities have done so.
S.B. 343 would make Texas revert to the rule created in 1868 federal court decision and
provide that a city may not enact an ordinance relating to anything governed by state law, unless
expressly authorized to do so.
- would be another
step in the centralization and consolidation of government power.
City councils often step up to the plate to protect the property values, the quality of life, and
even save the lives, of Texans. In many cases, cities have to make decisions at the
neighborhood level and not every neighborhood in a state of 26 million people is the same.
That is why Texans recognize there is a proper role for state government and a role for local
government.
S.B. 343 would abolish Home Rule cities and end local control
If you like the way New York operates, this is the bill for you
By: Huffines S.B. No. 343
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT relating to the conformity of local law with state law.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1.Chapter 1, Local Government Code, is amended by
adding Section 1.006 to read as follows:
Sec.1.006. CONFORMITY WITH STATE LAW. (a) Where the
state has passed a general statute or rule regulating a subject, a
local government shall restrict its jurisdiction and the passage of
its ordinances, rules, and regulations to and in conformity with
the state statute or rule on the same subject, unless the local
government is otherwise expressly authorized by statute.
(b) Unless expressly authorized by state statute, a local
government shall not implement an ordinance, rule, or regulation
that conflicts with or is more stringent than a state statute or
rule regardless of when the state statute or rule takes effect.
SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
Act takes effect September 1, 2015.
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
N/A N/A
Tim Tietjens Tim Tietjens Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Requested By:
Account Number:Account Number:
Planning & Development Planning & Development
Department:
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
1. Proposed Pipeline Easement to Dow 1. Proposed Pipeline Easement to Dow
Hydrocarbons & Resources, LLC.Hydrocarbons & Resources, LLC.
2. Area Map2. Area Map
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
Dow Hydrocarbons and Resources, LLC has approached the City to acquire an easement for future construction Dow Hydrocarbons and Resources, LLC has approached the City to acquire an easement
for future construction
of a 12Ethane Pipeline. Upon approval, the easement will be conveyed from two CityEthane Pipeline. Upon approval, the easement will be conveyed from two City--owned tracts located
owned tracts located
between the Union Pacific Railroad Rightbetween the Union Pacific Railroad Right--ofof--Way and the CityWay and the Citys Public Works and Fire Training facilities (see s Public Works
and Fire Training facilities (see
Area Map). The proposed easement is 30 feet in width and located within an existing 120Area Map). The proposed easement is 30 feet in width and located within an existing 120Houston
Lighting & Houston Lighting &
Power Company Easement containing 11 other existing pipelines.Power Company Easement containing 11 other existing pipelines.
The company has offered the City a purchase price of $500 per rod for the subject easement. Based on a recent The company has offered the City a purchase price of $500 per rod for
the subject easement. Based on a recent
appraisal for the pipeline easement, Staff has determined that Dowappraisal for the pipeline easement, Staff has determined that Dows offer reflects fair market value of the s offer
reflects fair market value of the
easement as proposed. Payment for the easement has been received from Dow in the amount of $32,555.00 easement as proposed. Payment for the easement has been received from Dow in the
amount of $32,555.00
pending final approval by City Council.pending final approval by City Council.
At this time, Dow Hydrocarbons and Resources, LLC desires to obtain only the pipeline easement from the City At this time, Dow Hydrocarbons and Resources, LLC desires to obtain only
the pipeline easement from the City
and will make application for a pipeline permit from the City at a future date.and will make application for a pipeline permit from the City at a future date.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
Consider approval or other action authorizing the City to convey a 30Consider approval or other action authorizing the City to convey a 30wide easement to Dow Hydrocarbons and wide
easement to Dow Hydrocarbons and
Resources, LLC for future construction of a 12Resources, LLC for future construction of a 12Ethane Pipeline.Ethane Pipeline.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
(Signature)
(Typed or Printed Name)
Doyle & Wachtstetter, Inc
Surveying and Mapping • GPS/GIS
DOW HYDROCARBONS & RESOURCES LLC 0.42ACRE SURFACE EASEMENT
OUT OF THE R. PEARSALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT 625
HARRISCOUNTY, TEXAS
ALL THAT CERTAIN 0.42ACRE
tract of land and being the centerline description of a 30 foot permanent
easement lying and situated in HarrisCounty, Texas and being out of the R. Pearsall Survey, Abstract No. 625
Harris County, Texas, and theherein described 0.42acre surface easementis more particularly out of a called
18.378 tract conveyed to City of La Porte recorded in Clerks File Number G-092634 of the Harris County Official
Records, Texas, the herein described 0.42acre surface easement hereby conveyed being more particularly described
by metes and bounds using survey terminology which refers to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, South
Central Zone (NAD83), in which the directions are Lambert grid bearings and the distances are surface level
horizontal lengths (S.F.= 1.000129918) as follows:
COMMENCING
atthe southeast corner of the said called 18.378acre tract as recorded in Clerks File Number
G-092634of theOfficial Records ofHarris County, Texas,said Point of Commencement being located at Texas
State Plane Coordinate position X=3226058.43 and Y=13811477.23;
THENCE
South 86°54’57”Westalong the southerlyline of said 18.378acre tract a distance of 83.82feet to the
PLACE OF BEGINNING
of herein describedeasement at position X=3225974.73 and Y=13811472.72;
THENCE
North 03°02’22”West, alone the centerline of herein described 30foot permanent easementa distance of
TERMINAL POINT
616.17feet to of herein described easement and being located at Texas State Plane
Coordinate position X=3225942.06and Y=13812088.02, said terminal point also being located South
86°54’57”West, 82.76feet from said northeast corner of said called 18.378acre tract;
This centerline description contains 37.34rods, more or less.
___
Registered Professional Land Surveyor
Texas Registered Number 4808
August 11, 2014,
This description is based on a survey on file in the office of Doyle & Wachtstetter, Inc.
Legal\\terry\\Dow Pipeline-Tx-Gv-msr-290.00Acre Surface Easement.doc
131 Commerce Street Clute, Texas 77531-5601
Phone: 979-265-3622 Fax: 979-265-9940 Email: DW-Surveyor.com
Doyle & Wachtstetter, Inc
Surveying and Mapping • GPS/GIS
DOW HYDROCARBONS & RESOURCES LLC 0.32 ACRE SURFACE EASEMENT
OUT OF THE R. PEARSALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT 625
HARRISCOUNTY, TEXAS
ALL THAT CERTAIN 0.32ACRE
tract of land and being the centerline description of a 30 foot permanent
easement lying and situated in HarrisCounty, Texas and being out of the R. Pearsall Survey, Abstract No. 625
Harris County, Texas, and theherein described 0.32acre surface easementis more particularly out of a called 8.072
tract conveyed to City of La Porte recorded in Clerks File Number K-867743of the Harris County OfficialRecords,
Texas, the herein described 0.32 acre surface easement hereby conveyed being more particularly described by metes
and bounds using survey terminology which refers to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, South Central Zone
(NAD83), in which the directions are Lambert grid bearings and the distances are surface level horizontal lengths
(S.F.= 1.000129918) as follows:
COMMENCING
atthe southeast corner of the said called 8.072acre tract as recorded in Clerks File Number
G-092634of theOfficial Records ofHarris County, Texas,said Point of Commencement being located at Texas
State Plane Coordinate position X=3226025.30 and Y=13812093.39;
THENCE
South 86°54’58”Westalong the southerlyline of said 8.072acre tract a distance of 83.41feet to the
PLACE OF BEGINNING
of herein described easement at position X=3225942.02 and Y=13812088.91;
THENCE
North 03°02’22”West, alone the centerline of herein described 30foot permanent easementa distanceof
TERMINAL POINT
458.27feet to of herein described easement and being located at Texas State Plane
Coordinate position X=3225917.72and Y=13812546.53, said terminal point also being located South
86°54’58”West, 83.05feet from said northeast corner of said called 8.072acre tract;
This centerline description contains 27.77rods, more or less.
___
Registered Professional Land Surveyor
Texas Registered Number 4808
August 11, 2014,
This description is based on a survey on file in the office of Doyle & Wachtstetter, Inc.
Legal\\terry\\Dow Pipeline-Tx-Gv-msr-292.00Acre Surface Easement.doc
131 Commerce Street Clute, Texas 77531-5601
Phone: 979-265-3622 Fax: 979-265-9940 Email: DW-Surveyor.com
AREA MAP
LOCATION OF PROP.
PIPELINE EASEMENT
N D ST
FIRE TRAINING
FACILITY
N C ST
PUBLIC WORKS
FACILITY
POLICE DEPT. / EOC
MUNIPAL
COURT
T
W MAIN S
SPE
NCER HWY
Legend
PIPELINE (EXISTING)
1 inch = 500 feet
CITY PROPERTY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
General General
Alex Osmond Alex Osmond Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Requested By:
00160495512007 00160495512007
Golf Course Golf Course Account Number:Account Number:
Department:
71,000 71,000
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
65,000 65,000
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
1. Helena Contract Information1. Helena Contract Information
2. BuyBoard Pricing2. BuyBoard Pricing
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
The contract for Chemicals and Fertilizer for the Golf Course expired January 31, 2015. Staff recommends the The contract for Chemicals and Fertilizer for the Golf Course expired January
31, 2015. Staff recommends the
utilization of BuyBoard contract 447utilization of BuyBoard contract 447--14 with Helena Chemical for the purchase of Chemicals and Fertilizers.14 with Helena Chemical for the purchase
of Chemicals and Fertilizers.
The contract includes Insecticides, Herbicides, Fungicides and Fertilizers needed to maintain the Golf Course. The contract includes Insecticides, Herbicides, Fungicides and Fertilizers
needed to maintain the Golf Course.
The City has received good product as well as good customer service from Helena in the past. The City has received good product as well as good customer service from Helena in the past.
Compared to the last contract bid out in 2013, the current BuyBoard price is less than a 2% increase. The Compared to the last contract bid out in 2013, the current BuyBoard price is
less than a 2% increase. The
estimated expenditure for this contract is $65,000. The BuyBoard contract is in effect until May 31, estimated expenditure for this contract is $65,000. The BuyBoard contract is in effect
until May 31,
2017.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
Consider approval or other action to authorize the purchase of chemicals and fertilizers from Helena Chemical Consider approval or other action to authorize the purchase of chemicals
and fertilizers from Helena Chemical
utilizing BuyBoard contract 447utilizing BuyBoard contract 447--14.14.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
.ǒǤ .ƚğƩķ tƩźĭźƓŭ
{ĻĭƷźƚƓ L LƓƭĻĭƷźĭźķĻƭ
LƷĻƒ 5ĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓ tƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ v
ha .ǒǤ .ƚğƩķ
ƓźƷ
bƚ͵ tğĭƉğŭźƓŭ tƩźĭĻ
Item 1 Acephate 1 lb. bags 5 Bag 10.74/lb
WSB
Item 2 Chipco Top Choice 50 lb. bags 100 Bag 2.50/lb
Item 3 Sevin SL 2.5 gal 2 Containers 34.00/gal
container
{ĻĭƷźƚƓ LL IĻƩĬźĭźķĻƭ
LƷĻƒ bƚ͵ 5ĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓ tƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ v
ha .ǒǤ .ƚğƩķ
ƓźƷ
tğĭƉğŭźƓŭ tƩźĭĻ
Item 1 Target MSMA 2.5 gal 12 Containers 24.38/gal
6 lb. material containers
Item 2 Weedar 64 2.5 gal 6 Containers 19.00/gal
containers
Item 3 Touch Down 2.5 gal 20 Containers 13.00/gal
containers
Item 4 Revolver 87 oz. 20 Containers 6.2068/oz
containers
Item 5 Surflan 2.5 gal 20 Containers 48.50/gal
containers
Item 6 IIIoxan 1 gal 4 Gal 221.05/gal
containers
Item 7 Celcius 10 oz. 8 Bottles 9.07/oz
bottles
Item 8 Kerb SC 3 lb. 60 Packages 285.00/gal
package
Item 9 Monument 25 gram 10 package 9.60/gram
package
Item 10 Injector Gal 15 Gal 18.00/gal
Penetrant
Item 11 Polaris 2.5 gal 8 Containers 72.12/gal
containers
Item 12 Ranger Pro 2.5 gal 40 Containers 15.00/gal
containers
Item 13 Imazapyr 2.5 gal 20 Containers 53.35/gal
containers
Item 14 Spray Indicator, 1 gal 10 Gal 25.90/gal
Blue containers
Page Њ of Ќ
{ĻĭƷźƚƓ LLL CǒƓŭźĭźķĻƭ
LƷĻƒ bƚ͵ 5ĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓ tƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ v
ha .ǒǤ.ƚğƩķ
ƓźƷ
tğĭƉğŭźƓŭ tƩźĭĻ
Item 1 Chipco 2.5 gal 4 Containers 45.56/gal
Flowable containers
Item 2 Banol 1 gal 10 Gal 286.25/gal
container
Item 3 Daconil Weather 2.5 gal 4 Containers 58.50/gal
Stik containers
Item 4 Subdue MAXX 1 gal 4 Gal 510.00/gal
containers
Item 5 Fore 80 WP Lb 200 Lb 7.69/lb
Rainshield
Item 6 Rubigan A.S. 1 gal 10 Gal No Bid/gal
containers
Item 7 T-Methyl 2.5 gal 4 Containers 72.00/gal
containers
Item 8 Heritage 1 lb 8 Lb 317.00/lb
containers
Item 9 Junction 6 lb 12 Containers 13.76/lb
containers
Item 10 Prostar 70 WSB 1 lb 20 Lb 54.89/lb
container
{ĻĭƷźƚƓ L DƩĻĻƓƭ DƩğķĻ CĻƩƷźƌźǩĻƩ
LƷĻƒ bƚ͵ 5ĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓ tƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ v
ha .ǒǤ.ƚğƩķ
ƓźƷ
tğĭƉğŭźƓŭ tƩźĭĻ
Item 1 Promate 18 50 lb bags 80 Bags .68/lb
w/65%
Nutralene
Item 2 Howard Johnson 50 lb bags 80 Bags .67/lb
10-20-20 w/50%
Promate
{ĻĭƷźƚƓ CğźƩǞğǤ CĻƩƷźƌźǩĻƩ
LƷĻƒ bƚ͵ 5ĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓ tƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ v
ha .ǒǤ.ƚğƩķ
ƓźƷ
tğĭƉğŭźƓŭ tƩźĭĻ
Item 1 Bonus Crop 18-50 lb bags 320 Bags No bid
6-12 w/50% SCU
Houactinite, 5%
FE
Page Ћ of Ќ
{ĻĭƷźƚƓ L hƷŷĻƩ tƩƚķǒĭƷƭ
LƷĻƒ bƚ͵ 5ĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓ tƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ v
ha .ǒǤ.ƚğƩķ
ƓźƷ
tğĭƉğŭźƓŭ tƩźĭĻ
Item 1 Wipe Out tank 1 qt 10 Quart 9.00/qt
cleaner containers
Item 2 Promate spray 1 gal 30 Gal 25.90/gal
Indictor containers
Item 3 Add Spray 80 2.5 gal 4 Container 13.64/gal
sticker/spreader containers
Item 4 Promate lake 1 gal 25 Gal 28.72/gal
dye containers
Item 5 Primo Maxx 1 gal 4 Gal 283.00/gal
containers
Page Ќ of Ќ
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
CIP#0159892993 CIP#0159892993
Scott D. Linvingston Scott D. Linvingston Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Requested By:
Account Number:Account Number:
Economic Development/Tourism Economic Development/Tourism
Department:
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
25,000 25,000
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
1. Project Presentation1. Project Presentation
2. Bid Sheet Summary2. Bid Sheet Summary
3. Enhancement Grant Application3. Enhancement Grant Application
4. Enhancement Grant Evaluation Summary4. Enhancement Grant Evaluation Summary
5. La Porte Enhancement Grant Guidelines & 5. La Porte Enhancement Grant Guidelines &
Map
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
The Enhancement Grant Review Committee reviewed an Enhancement Grant Application from Eagle Energy The Enhancement Grant Review Committee reviewed an Enhancement Grant Application from
Eagle Energy
Resources, LLC, which is the new owner of the Resources, LLC, which is the new owner of the Alamo buildingAlamo buildingat 153 S. Broadway. The applicant is planning at 153 S. Broadway.
The applicant is planning
to enhance all four (4) sides of the buildingto enhance all four (4) sides of the buildings exterior. s exterior.
The applicant collected three bids from general contractors to complete five primary projects only on the west The applicant collected three bids from general contractors to complete
five primary projects only on the west
side (front facing S. Broadway) and south side (facing East Street/San Jacinto Ave.) of the building. The five side (front facing S. Broadway) and south side (facing East Street/San
Jacinto Ave.) of the building. The five
primary projects are:primary projects are:
(1) Stucco Work/Façade Repair (1) Stucco Work/Façade Repair (1) Stucco Work/Façade Repair (1) Stucco Work/Façade Repair
(2) Painting
(3) Doors
(4) Canopy Work(4) Canopy Work
(5) Exterior Lighting(5) Exterior Lighting
The applicant secured three additional bids for ornamental The applicant secured three additional bids for ornamental Texas StarsTexas Starsthat will be installed on the buildingthat
will be installed on the buildings
exterior.
The general contractor offering the lowest bid for the five primary projects is CLS Builders, Inc. for $48,257. The general contractor offering the lowest bid for the five primary
projects is CLS Builders, Inc. for $48,257.
The lowest bid to manufacture and ship the The lowest bid to manufacture and ship the Texas StarsTexas Starsis Iron Designs and Signs for $2,368.90. is Iron Designs and Signs for
$2,368.90.
The sum total of these two lowest bids is $50,625.90, and 50 percent of this sum is $25,312.95. Please see the The sum total of these two lowest bids is $50,625.90, and 50 percent
of this sum is $25,312.95. Please see the
Bid Sheet SummaryBid Sheet Summaryfor details. The maximum amount allowed per property owner through the La Porte for details. The maximum amount allowed per property owner through
the La Porte
Enhancement Grant Program is $25,000. Therefore, the maximum amount to be reimbursed for this project would Enhancement Grant Program is $25,000. Therefore, the maximum amount to be
reimbursed for this project would
be $25,000.
The Enhancement Grant Evaluation Committee reviewed this enhancement project and believes this project will The Enhancement Grant Evaluation Committee reviewed this enhancement project
and believes this project will
encourage similar reencourage similar re--development throughout the community of La Porte. The Enhancement Grant Evaluation development throughout the community of La Porte. The Enhancement
Grant Evaluation
Committee gave this project a score of 4.75 out of a maximum possible score of 5.0. Please see the enclosed Committee gave this project a score of 4.75 out of a maximum possible score
of 5.0. Please see the enclosed
Evaluation SummaryEvaluation Summaryfor additional detail. for additional detail.
The City of La Porte Development Corporation Board approved this enhancement grant application on February 9, The City of La Porte Development Corporation Board approved this enhancement
grant application on February 9,
2015, for an amount not to exceed $25,000.2015, for an amount not to exceed $25,000.
The applicant will be available at the meeting to address any questions the City Council might have about the The applicant will be available at the meeting to address any questions
the City Council might have about the
proposed project. proposed project.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
Consider approval or other action regarding an enhancement grant amount not to exceed Consider approval or other action regarding an enhancement grant amount not to exceed to to
$25,000$25,000Eagle Eagle
, to be awarded at the completion of the project, conditional upon receipts and the , to be awarded at the completion of the project, conditional upon receipts and the
Energy Resources, LLCEnergy Resources, LLC
completion of work as indicated.completion of work as indicated.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
9ğŭƌĻ 9ƓĻƩŭǤ wĻƭƚǒƩĭĻƭͲ \[\[/
153 S. Broadway Street
www.eagleenergy.us
discipline approach to identifying, evaluating,
experience in a diverse number of operating environments results in the application
principle objective is to grow the company
, development, and exploration principally along the Gulf Coast
of more efficient recovery and production methods, improved facility engineering
style immediately adds value to acquired operated properties by
The tenure and experience of our
Our technical analysis and
office operational
/ƚƒƦğƓǤ LƓƷƩƚķǒĭƷźƚƓ
-
to
-
Our efficient field
minimizing expenses and streamlining procedures.
Basin and in Southeast Texas and Louisiana.
Our
-
professional staff is focused on a multi
founded in 1988.
and acquiring undervalued assets.
.
and lower overhead
acquisition
was
management
Eagle Energy
through
each of
"Canopy
of the
bids
υЋͲЌЏБ͵ВЉ
maximum amount allowed per property owner through the La
3) additional
, and 50% of this sum is
to complete the five (5)
exterior, they collected three (3) bids from general contractors to complete
ƭźķĻƭ
(4)
(i.e. the front side facing S.
offered the lowest bid of
"Doors",
(i.e. the side facing East Street/San Jacinto Ave.)
three (
(3)
"Painting",
secured
tƩƚƆĻĭƷ {ǒƒƒğƩǤ
υЎЉͲЏЋЎ͵ВЉ
ЍБͲЋЎА
applicant
Work/Façade Repair", (2)
.
ƚƓƌǤ ƷŷĻ ǞĻƭƷ
5ĻƭźŭƓƭ ğƓķ {źŭƓƭ
υЋЎͲЉЉЉ
υ
of
The sum total of these two, lowest bids is
that will be
The
. offered the lowest bid
Porte Enhancement Grant Program is
"Exterior Lighting".
the five (5) primary projects on
LƩƚƓ
primary projects, while
"Stucco
ğƓķ ƭƚǒƷŷ
The
.ǒźƌķĻƩƭͲ LƓĭ
)
5
)
.
(
Work", and
Broadway)
1
υЋЎͲЌЊЋ͵ВЎ
building: (
/\[{
to
{Ʒǒĭĭƚ ƚƩƉΉCğIJğķĻ wĻƦğźƩ
CƩƚƓƷ ğƓķ wĻğƩ 9ƌĻǝğƷźƚƓ wĻƓķĻƩźƓŭƭ
{źķĻ 9ƌĻǝğƷźƚƓ wĻƓķĻƩźƓŭƭ
tğźƓƷźƓŭ
5ƚƚƩƭ
/ğƓƚƦǤ
The underside of the canopy, which runs the full length of the front of the building,
will be covered with a vinyl soffit material to resemble wood. The color of the
exterior.
9ǣƷĻƩźƚƩ \[źŭŷƷźƓŭ
Ļǣğƭ {ƷğƩƭ
Eagle Energy Resources, LLC
1909 Marvin Circle, Suite A
Dshows@eagleenergy.us
For additional information please contact:
Seabrook, Texas 77586
3379 x 302
President & CEO
5ƚǒŭ {ŷƚǞƭ
-
(281) 474
δDĻƓĻƩğƌ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ .źķδ źƓĭƌǒķĻƭ ŅźǝĻ ΛЎΜ ƦƩźƒğƩǤ ƦƩƚƆĻĭƷƭʹ ΛЊΜ δ{Ʒǒĭĭƚ ƚƩƉΉCğIJğķĻ wĻƦğźƩδͲ ΛЋΜ δtğźƓƷźƓŭδͲ ΛЌΜ δ5ƚƚƩƭδͲ ΛЍΜ
tƩƚƆĻĭƷ ƚƷğƌ
υЋЎͲЌЊЋ͵ВЎ
.źķķĻƩ {ŷĻĻƷ {ǒƒƒğƩǤ ΏΏ 9ğŭƌĻ 9ƓĻƩŭǤ wĻƭƚǒƩĭĻƭͲ \[\[/
Ļǣğƭ {ƷğƩƭ
υЋͲБВВ͵ББυЋͲБАЋ͵БЊ υЋͲЌЏБ͵ВЉ
ЊЎЌ {͵ .ƩƚğķǞğǤͳ \[ğ tƚƩƷĻͲ Ļǣğƭ ААЎАЊ
Њ
DĻƓĻƩğƌ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ .źķ
υЍБͲЋЎА͵ЉЉ
υЏЏͲЊАЏ͵ЉЉυЎБͲЏЎЉ͵ЉЉ
δ/ğƓƚƦǤ ƚƩƉδͲ ğƓķ ΛЎΜ δ9ǣƷĻƩźƚƩ \[źŭŷƷźƓŭδ͵
wğƭğ /ƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ /ƚ͵Ͳ LƓĭ͵
\[t5/γƭ ЎЉі /ƚƓƷƩźĬǒƷźƚƓʹ
wĻķŅźĻƌķ /ǒƭƷƚƒ .ǒźƌķźƓŭ
bğźƌŷĻğķ {ƦǒƩ /ƚƒƦğƓǤ
LƩƚƓ 5ĻƭźŭƓƭ ğƓķ {źŭƓƭ
/\[{ .ǒźƌķĻƩƭͲ LƓĭ͵
{ƷğƩƭ hǝĻƩ Ļǣğƭ
Њ
bƚƷĻƭʹ
1/12/2015
Following is a summary of the evaluations of the La Porte Enhancement Grant Evaluating Commmittee (EGEC). If you have any questions
Average
4.754.254.75
4.75
, based on reciepts and
DougS@eagleenergy.us 55
# of Evaluators
Initial Review Date:Total Average Score (out of 25)
44444
.
(281) 470-5016
$25,000
Total Score
1909 Marvin Circle, Suite A; Seabrook, Texas 77586
2020191719
E-Mail:
Grant to be awarded in an amount not to exceed
about the items listed below, please call the Economic Development Office at
completion of work as indicated.
Eagle Energy Resources, LLC
281-474-3379 x 302
Project Demonstrates a significant improvement over the existing situation.
Doug Shows
Project will enhance Main Street's appeal to new businesses and visitors.
1/9/2015
Economic Development Coordinator
Resident, employee of La Car Porte
Owner, Bay Port Animal Clinic
Criteria
Project will add to the beautification of Main Street.
Project will complement the surrounding buildings.
Director of Planning
Project adds value to the City of La Porte.
Recommendation:
Business Address:
Application Date:
Business Name:
Contact Name:
Phone:Evaluating Committee Members:
Title
Scott D. Livingston
Monica Rogers
Cris Santiago
Tim Tietjens
Name
LA PORTE ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
The La Porte Enhancement Grant Program, which is sponsored by the La Porte Development
Corporation,offers matching grantstobusinesseswhich are locatedin the La Porte
Enhancement Grant District. A map of the La Porte Enhancement Grant District is provided in
the full explanation of the program.
Eligible improvements of the EGP include facade renovation, beautification projects, and
new awnings, canopies, porches, and signage. A single owner of multiple properties may
apply for grant funds for each property owned, but each matching grant must be for more
than $2,500 and less than $25,000 per property. Each program application will be evaluated
on a case-by-case basis.
Interested business owners are welcome to complete the enclosed application form. Please
deliver applications to the following address:
Scott D. Livingston
Economic Development Coordinator
City of La Porte
604 W. Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, TX 77571
Please contact Scott D. Livingston at livingstons@laportetx.gov or 281/470-5016, if you have
any questions about the La Porte Enhancement Grant Program.
Sincerely,
Scott D. Livingston
Economic Development Coordinator
City of La Porte
L PORTE BY THE BAY
A
604 W. Fairmont Parkway La Porte, Texas 77571 281/470-5016
BUSINESS. BY THE BAY.
La Porte Enhancement Grant Program
The La Porte Enhancement Grant Program provides matching funds to enhance and/or beautify
businesses in the La Porte Enhancement Grant District which is outlined with a bold black linebelow.
LA PORTE ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
PAGE 1
BUSINESS. BY THE BAY.
ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
Business owners may be eligible for a reimbursement grant of funds used to enhance and/or beautify
their businesses. The following types of projects are eligible for reimbursement grants:
Façade Rehabilitation/Enhancement
This includes work done on existing structures, such as removing non-historic/added facades,
re-pointing brick or replacing mortar joints, replacing or restoring cornices, removing paint
from brick, replacing windows, restoring transom windows, repairing facades, etc.
New Awnings, Canopies, Porches and Signage
This includes replacing, adding, or repairing awnings, canopies, porches and signs. Signs may
include signboards, projecting signs, pedestrian signage, window signs, hanging signs, and
awning/canopy signs.
Beautification Projects
This may include public art, landscaping, and other beautification projects as approved by
the Enhancement Grant Evaluation Committee (EGEC).
PROGRAM GUIDELINES
1.Grant funds are available only for exterior work on commercial property and building
facades that are visible from public streets in the La Porte Enhancement Grant District.
2.In general, grants offered to businesses are intended to support project to renovate or
convert existing structures to their original historic condition.
3.Grants will be processed and considered for award on a first-come, first-served basis until
funds are depleted or until the program ends, whichever comes first.
4.Grants will not be awarded for work that has already been started or completed, or for work
that is covered by insurance. If desired work is above and beyond what insurance will pay,
and is, therefore, considered an upgrade and enhancement in the opinion of the EGEC, it
may be eligible for grant funds.
5.Grants will not be awarded to any Applicant that owes any delinquent indebtedness* to the
City of La Porte or the La Porte Development Corporation (LPDC).
LA PORTE ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
PAGE 2
BUSINESS. BY THE BAY.
6.Each grant will be awarded on a reimbursement basis once completed work has been verified
by the EGEC to be compliant with the plans proposed in the approved application. Any
deviation from the approved project may result in the total or partial withdrawal of the grant.
7.Each enhancement grant application will be subject to review by the EGEC, and approval
from the LPDC. The review criteria include the following:
The project demonstrates a significant improvement over the existing situation,
The project will add to the beautification of Main Street and/or Broadway,
The project will enhance Main Street and/or Broadways appeal to new businesses
and visitors,
The project will complement the surrounding buildings, and
The project will add value to the City of La Porte.
8.Grant applications and awards may be made in any of the reimbursable activities described
above and may be combined for any single property or project.
9.An applicant is defined as an owner, tenant, or combination thereof, who occupies space in
an eligible property within the La Porte Enhancement Grant District. A single owner of
multiple properties may apply for grant funds for each property owned, but the matching
grant must be for more than $2,500 and less than $25,000 per property in a three (3) year
period.
APPLICATION PROCESS
1.Determine eligibility: Discuss project plans with the Economic Development Coordinator, and
the Coordinator will set up a pre-development meeting with the EGEC.
2.Complete the application and sign the agreement form. Each grant application must include
the following:
a.A scale drawing by the project architect or design professional of all the work to be
completed.
b.Samples -- i.e. paint samples, fabric swatches, sign material, etc. -- that will enable
the EGEC to envision the finished project.
c.Three (3) itemized work estimates on all project work from contractors or project
architects. Self-contracted work will be reimbursed for actual legitimate expenses,
excluding labor.
LA PORTE ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
PAGE 3
BUSINESS. BY THE BAY.
d.Photographs of the buildings exterior. The Applicant shall be required to provide
before and after photographs of the building before the reimbursement grant can be
awarded. For the initial application, before photographs will suffice, but after
photographs of the completed project must be submitted before the grant may be
considered for reimbursement.
3.Return the completed application form, with all applicable items, to:
Scott D. Livingston
Economic Development Coordinator
City of La Porte
604 W. Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, TX 77571
4.The application will undergo an approval process, which includes but is not limited to the
following:
a.Each project must meet current building standards and codes, as well as building
permit requirements.
b.The EGEC will only consider applications that have been properly and fully
completed, and which contain all information requested in the application and/or by
the committee.
c.All itemized work estimates submitted by the Applicant must be dated no earlier than
ninety (90) days prior to the Application request. Bids shall be submitted on the
contractors or project architects letterhead and shall contain the contractors name,
address, and telephone number and shall itemize the bid in a manner that allows the
EGEC to determine the bid components and authenticity of the bid.
d.Applications receiving approval by the EGEC shall commence construction described
in the application within ninety (90) days from the date that the enhancement grant is
approved. Each Applicant must complete the construction described in the
Application within one (1) year from the date that the grant is approved. If the
Applicant cannot meet this timeline, then the Applicant may submit a written request
for an extension of the commencement date or completion date provided the
extension request is made prior to the ninety (90) day or one (1) year time limit. The
EGEC shall not be obligated to grant an extension, but it may do so for good cause
determined solely by the members of the Committee. The extensions, if granted, shall
be for the term and for the conditions determined exclusively by the EGEC. Denial of
an extension request may not be appealed.
e.As a condition of this grant Application, the Applicant consents, and shall allow, the
EGEC to request city inspections to determine that the grant, if awarded, will not be
used for construction on any building that is not in compliance with the City Municipal
LA PORTE ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
PAGE 4
BUSINESS. BY THE BAY.
Codes and Ordinances that are applicable to the construction contemplated in the
application.
f.The EGEC and LPDC shall have sole discretion in awarding grants. They shall award
grants considering the amount requested, grant funds available, the guidelines of the
grant program, condition of the building in which the grant funds will be used,
economic impact, other grant requests, the type and nature of the construction, and
the proposed construction results considering the grant program.
g.No Applicant has a proprietary right to receive grant funds. The EGEC shall consider
any application within its discretionary authority to determine what grant amount
would be in the best interest of the grant program.
h.The Applicant shall be required to furnish before photographs of the buildings
exterior, and any other site locations that are included as part of the application
request. The applicant shall also provide after photographs once the construction
has been completed, as a condition of final grant disbursement.
i.The EGEC has the final discretion with regard to funding and reserves the right to
recommend modifications or reject any project or elements of any project.
5.Reimbursement. When the entire enhancement grant project has been completed, the
Applicant shall present the Economic Development Office with the following:
a.Copies of all paid invoices, including copies of cancelled checks and/or credit card
receipts for a single payment reimbursement of the approved funding, and
b.Photographs of all completed work.
6.When the project has been reviewed and signed off by the EGEC and their recommendations
have been presented and approved by the LPDC, a reimbursement check will be issued.
LA PORTE ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
PAGE 5
BUSINESS. BY THE BAY.
La Porte Enhancement Grant Application
Scott D. Livingston
Economic Development Coordinator
City of La Porte
604 W. Fairmont Pkwy
La Porte, TX 77571
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
APPLICATION DATE:
Applicant Name
Business Name
Physical Business Address
Business Owner (if different from applicant)
Mailing Address
Contact Phone Email Address
TYPE OF WORK ():
Façade Rehabilitation/Enhancement Awnings/Signage
Beautification Other ():
DETAILS OF PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS ():
ENHANCEMENT GRANT APPLICATION
PAGE 1
BUSINESS. BY THE BAY.
Please list the name of eachContractor and/or Project Architect and the Total Amount of each bid. Please,
also, attach the original proposals and work estimates:
CONTRACTOR/PROJECT ARCHITECTTOTAL AMOUNT
1.$
2. $
3. $
4. $
5. $
BUDGET DETAIL
PROJECT EXPENDITURES FUNDS REQUESTED FUNDS APPLIEDTOTAL
Façade Rehab $ $ $
Awnings/Signage $ $ $
Beautification $ $ $
Other (list):$ $ $
Other (list):$ $ $
TOTALS $ $ $
Total estimated cost of proposed project: $
Amount requested (up to 50% of total cost, $2,500 to $25,000): $
I have met with the EGEC and I fully understand the Enhancement Grant procedures and details established. I
intend to use these grant funds for the renovation projects, as spelled out in the application. I have not
received, nor will I receive insurance monies for this revitalization project OR I have disclosed all pertinent
insurance information.
I understand that if I am awarded an Enhancement Grant, any deviation from the approved project may result
in the partial or total withdrawal of the grant funds. If I am awarded a reimbursement grant for façade,
awning, signage, beautification, or other approved work, alterations should not be made within five (5) years
from construction; otherwise I may be required to reimburse the La Porte Development Corporation
immediately for the full amount of the grant.
APPLICANT SIGNATURE DATE
ENHANCEMENT GRANT APPLICATION
PAGE 2
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Donald Ladd Donald Ladd
Requested By:
Account Number:Account Number:
Fire Fire
Department:
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:N/A N/A
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
1. Copy of Shoreacres Agreement1. Copy of Shoreacres Agreement
2. Cost Sheet2. Cost Sheet
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
The City has negotiated a new contract with the City of Shoreacres for Fire Protection Service for a period of 60 The City has negotiated a new contract with the City of Shoreacres for
Fire Protection Service for a period of 60
months, in the amount of $11,126.81 monthly. This is an increase of $1,551 per month. Monthly payment was months, in the amount of $11,126.81 monthly. This is an increase of $1,551 per
month. Monthly payment was
based on yearly budget, debt services, and current CIP projects for a percent by population calculation.This new based on yearly budget, debt services, and current CIP projects for a
percent by population calculation.This new
agreement is for fire suppression services and does not include first responder or any medical response. The agreement is for fire suppression services and does not include first responder
or any medical response. The
agreement is for the period starting March 1, 2015 and runs through February 28, 2020. agreement is for the period starting March 1, 2015 and runs through February 28, 2020.
The current contract expired on October1, 2014 and has been renewing monthly.The current contract expired on October1, 2014 and has been renewing monthly.
Recommend that City Council approve the City Manager to execute the new agreement.Recommend that City Council approve the City Manager to execute the new agreement.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement with the City of Consider approval or other action authorizing the City Manager to execute the
agreement with the City of
..
Shoreacres for Fire Protection ServicesShoreacres for Fire Protection Services
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
AGREEMENT
THESTATEOFTEXAS X
COUNTYOFHARRISX
ThisAgreementmadeandenteredintobyandbetweentheCITYOFLAPORTE,a
"LAPORTE"
municipalcorporationofHarrisCounty,TexashereinafterreferredtoasandtheCITY
OFSHOREACRES,amunicipalcorporationofHarrisCounty,Texas,hereinafterreferredtoas
"CITY",
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS,CITYisinneedofcertaingovernmentalservices forthebenefitofthepeople
andpropertywithinitscitylimits,and
WHEREAS,LAPORTEisableandwillingtoprovidesaidgovernmentalservicestoCITY,
upontheterms,conditions,andcovenantshereincontained:
NOW, THEREFORE,PURSUANTTOTHEAUTHORITYGRANTEDBYChapter791,
in
"InterlocalCooperationContracts",TexasGovernmentCode,andconsiderationofthemutual
covenants,agreements,andbenefitstobothcities,itisherebyagreedasfollows:
GENERALPROVISIONS
A.
I.
Forandduringthesixtymonths(60)beginningonthe1stdayofMarch 2015,andendingonthe28th
dayofFebruary,2020,LAPORTEagreestofurnishCITY,thegovernmentalserviceshereinafter
morespecificallydescribed.Thisagreementshallremainineffectduringsaidsixty(60)monthterm
unlesscanceledbyeitherpartyasprovidedinParagraphA-IVhereof.Furthermore,thisagreement
shallautomaticallycontinueona month-to-monthbasis,startingMarch 1,2020,untilcancelledby
party.Thisagreement
either partybythegivingofthirty(30)daysadvancewrittennoticetotheother
supersedesanyprioragreementbetweenthepartiesonthesubjectmatterhereof.
II.
Forandinconsideration ofthegovernmentalservicestobeprovidedbyLAPORTEtoCITY,CITY
agreestopayLAPORTE asfollows,towit:
$11,126.81
(1)MonthlybasechargeforFireProtection:
(2)Thetotalofsuchbasecharges tobepaidinfullbyCITYto LAPORTE,onorbeforethetenth
dayofthemonthfollowingthemonthinwhichsuchserviceswererendered.PaymentsbyCITYshall
bemadefromcurrentrevenuesavailabletoCITY.
III.
LAPORTEwillnotbeliableforlossordamagetopersonorpropertyarisingfrom,causedby,or
resultingfromallegednegligenceofLAPORTE,itsemployeesorvolunteersincarryingoutthe
termsofthisagreement.CITYagreestoindemnify,andsaveandholdLAPORTEharmless,from
anysuchclaimforlossordamagebyitself,orbyanyperson,firm,corporation,orassociation,in
connectionwiththisagreement.
IV.
Eitherparty tothis agreementmaycancelbygiving sixty(60)dayswrittennoticetotheotherparty.
Suchnoticewillbeeffectiveasofmidnightofthelastdayoftheexpirationof suchsixty(60)days
notice.
v.
CITYpersonnelshallabideby allLAPORTErules,regulations,andpolicies,astheynowexist,or
maybeamendedhereafter,relatingtotheservicesrenderedincludingtheuseoffacilitiesmade
availabletotheCITYunderthetermsofthisagreement.
FIREPROTECTION
B.
I.
LAPORTEagreestoprovidefireprotection,limitedtofiresuppressionservicesonly,and
specificallyexcludingemergencymedicalservices,forrealandpersonalpropertysituatedwithin
CITY,forthetermofthisagreement,uponthetermsandconditionshereincontained.
II.
Solediscretionwillrest withtheLAPORTEFireChief,orhisdulyauthorizedassistants,astothe
firefightersandequipmentthatwillanswereachfirealarm,providedthatprotectionwillbeadequate
(meaningreasonableprotection,consideringavailablefirefightersandequipmentofLAPORTE'S
FireDepartment)andsendingoffirefighters andequipmenttoprotectpropertywithinCTIYwillbe
subordinatetorequestsfor,andrenderingof,fireprotectionwithinLAPORTE.
Ill.
CityagreestopayLAPORTEforfireprotectionservices,theamounts,andinmanner,hereinabove
specified.
WITNESS OURHANDS andthesealsofourrespective Cities,effectiveasofthe 1STday
ofMarch,2015.
CounciloftheCityofLaPorte,
PASSEDAND APPROVEDbytheCitybyitsOrdinanceNo.
on the____dayof__________________,2015.
____,
CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS
City SecretaryCity Manager
_______________________________________
Assist.CityAttorney
__________________
PASSEDANDAPPROVEDbytheCityCounciloftheCityofShoreacres,byitsOrdinance
No.,onthedayof2015.
CITYOFSHOREACRES
City SecretaryCity Manager
_______________________________________
CityAttorney
_______________
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Kathy Powell Kathy Powell
Requested By:
Account Number:Account Number:
Finance Finance
Department:
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
1. Resolution1. Resolution
2. Deeds, Bids and Map2. Deeds, Bids and Map
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
If a property is sold or struck off to a taxing unit that is party to a judgment, the taxing unit may sell the property at If a property is sold or struck off to a taxing unit that is
party to a judgment, the taxing unit may sell the property at
any time by public or private sale. The City of La Porte has had these properties on our public resale list for more any time by public or private sale. The City of La Porte has had
these properties on our public resale list for more
than an adequate amount of time and has received a bid for the minimum bid amount set by the judgment or than an adequate amount of time and has received a bid for the minimum bid amount
set by the judgment or
higher. At this time we are asking the city council to pass a resolution to approve the sale of these properties for higher. At this time we are asking the city council to pass a resolution
to approve the sale of these properties for
the amount that has been offered. the amount that has been offered.
P213(2) Lots 19 & 20 Block 200 Town of La PorteLots 19 & 20 Block 200 Town of La PorteOffer $6,250.00Offer $6,250.00
(Adjudged Value $6,250.00 Taxes+Cost $4,961.40)(Adjudged Value $6,250.00 Taxes+Cost $4,961.40)
P140 P140 Lot 27, 28 & 29 Block 76 Bayfront to La Porte Lot 27, 28 & 29 Block 76 Bayfront to La Porte Lot 27, 28 & 29 Block 76 Bayfront to La Porte Lot 27, 28 & 29 Block 76 Bayfront
to La Porte Offer $7,500.00Offer $7,500.00Offer $7,500.00Offer $7,500.00
(Adjudged Value $5,300.00 Taxes+Costs $9,279.12) (Adjudged Value $5,300.00 Taxes+Costs $9,279.12)
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution authorizing the sale of the properties listed above.Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution authorizing the
sale of the properties listed above.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
Notice of confidentiality rights: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for
record in the public records: your social security number or your driver's license
number
(Language pursuant section 11.008 of the Texas Property Code)
THE STATE OF TEXAS§
§TAX RESALE DEED
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the CITY OF LA PORTE, TRUSTEE, for the
use and benefit of itself, LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS
COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY,
HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTand the SAN JACINTOCOMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT,acting by and through its duly elected officials (“GRANTOR”) as
authorized by Section 34.05, Texas Property Tax Code, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($10.00) AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, in hand paid by MARTIN VASQUEZ(“GRANTEES”) the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, has conveyed and quitclaimed and by these
presents do convey and quitclaim unto said Grantee all right, title and interest of the CITY OF
LA PORTE, LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS
COUNTY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT, PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, HARRISCOUNTY
HOSPITAL DISTRICT and the SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTin the
property herein conveyed, acquired by tax foreclosure sale heretofore held, in Cause No. 2004-
48872, styled City of La Porte and La Porte Independent School District v. Charles W.F.
Compton, said property being described as:
LOTS 19 AND 20, BLOCK 200, OF LA PORTE, AN ADDITION IN HARRIS
COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF FILED IN
THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.(ACCOUNT
NUMBER 024-005-000-0019).
This conveyance is made and accepted subject to the following matters to the extent that
the same are in effect at this time: any and all rights of redemption, restrictions, covenants,
conditions, easements, encumbrances and outstanding mineral interests, if any, relating to the
hereinabove described property, but only to the extent they are still in effect, shown of record in
the hereinabove mentioned County and State, and to all zoning laws, regulations and ordinances
of municipal and/or other governmental authorities, if any but only to the extent that they are still
in effect, relating to the hereinabove described property.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said premises, together with all and singular the rights,
privileges and appurtenances thereto in any manner belonging unto the saidMARTIN
VASQUEZ,hisheirs and assigns forever, so that neither the CITY OF LA PORTE, LA PORTE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY
EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, PORT
P213(2)
OF HOUSTON AUTHORITYOF HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL
DISTRICT and the SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTnorany person
claiming under it shall at any time hereafter have, claim or demand any right or title to the
aforesaid premises or appurtenances, or any part thereof.
Grantee acceptsthe property in “AS IS, WHERE IS” condition and subject to any
environmental conditions that might have or still exist on said property, and subject to any title
defects and deficiencies, and subject to the right of redemption, if any, provided under the Texas
Property Tax Code. Grantee acknowledgesand agreesthat this conveyance is expressly made
without warranty.
This transaction is in full satisfaction of all taxes, penalties, interest, and costs that have
accrued until the date hereof.
Pro rata taxes for the current year are assumed by Grantee.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, CITY OF LA PORTE, TRUSTEE, for the use and benefit
of itself, LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS
COUNTY EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT, PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY
HOSPITAL DISTRICT and the SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICThas
caused these presents to be executed this ________day of ______________________ 2015.
CITY OF LA PORTE, TRUSTEE
LOUIS R. RIGBY,MAYOR,
CITY OF LA PORTE
ACCEPTED:
______________________________
MARTIN VASQUEZ
P213(2)
THE STATE OF TEXAS§
§
COUNTY OF HARRIS§
BEFORE ME
, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared LOUIS R.
RIGBY, Mayor, City of La Porte, known to me to bethe person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and with the conditions and the
limitations therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _______ day of
__________________________, 2015.
________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the
STATE OF TEXAS
My Commission Expires: ____________
THE STATE OF TEXAS§
§
COUNTY OF HARRIS§
BEFORE ME
, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared MARTIN
VASQUEZknown to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged to me that he executed same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and with the conditions and the limitations therein
stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _______ day of
__________________________, 2015.
________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the
STATE OF TEXAS
My Commission Expires: ____________
After Recording
Return To:MARTIN VASQUEZ
321 S FIFTEENTH ST
LA PORTE, TX 77571
P213(2)
AREA MAP
37199
µ
T
A SE A ST
W
201
200
36
218
W
B ST
LOCATION OF PARCEL
(HCAD #024-005-000-0019)
220
13
219
1 inch = 100 feet
Notice of confidentiality rights: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for
record in the public records: your social security number or your driver's license
number
(Language pursuant section 11.008 of the Texas Property Code)
THE STATE OF TEXAS§
§TAX RESALE DEED
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the CITY OF LA PORTE, TRUSTEE, for the
use and benefit of itself, LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS
COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY,
HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTand the SAN JACINTOCOMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT,acting by and through its duly elected officials (“GRANTOR”) as
authorized by Section 34.05, Texas Property Tax Code, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($10.00) AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, in hand paid by ROY HUNTER(“GRANTEES”) the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged and confessed, has conveyed and quitclaimed and by these presents do
convey and quitclaim unto said Grantee all right, title and interest of the CITY OF LA PORTE,
LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, PORT
OF HOUSTON AUTHORITYOF HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL
DISTRICT and the SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTin the property
herein conveyed, acquired by tax foreclosure sale heretofore held, in Cause No. 2000-18753,
styled City of La Porte and La Porte Independent School District v. Francis F. Sneiger a/k/a
Francis F. Sneigr, said property being described as:
LOTS27, 28, AND 29 IN BLOCK 76, BAY FRONT ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF
LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT OF
SAID BAY FRONT ADDITION OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
CLERK OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING THE SAME PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN A QUITCLAIM DEED FILED UNDER HARRIS COUNTY
CLERK’S FILE NUMBER E195604. (ACCOUNT NUMBER 006-166-000-0027).
This conveyance is made and accepted subject to the following matters to the extent that
the same are in effect at this time: any and all rights of redemption, restrictions, covenants,
conditions, easements, encumbrances and outstanding mineral interests, if any, relating to the
hereinabove described property, but only to the extent they are still in effect, shown of record in
the hereinabove mentioned County and State, and to all zoning laws, regulations and ordinances
of municipal and/or other governmental authorities, if any but only to the extent that they are still
in effect, relating to the hereinabove described property.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said premises, together with all and singular the rights,
privileges and appurtenances thereto in any manner belonging unto the saidROY HUNTER,his
heirs and assigns forever, so that neither the CITY OF LA PORTE, LA PORTE
P140
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY
EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, PORT
OF HOUSTON AUTHORITYOF HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL
DISTRICT and the SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTnorany person
claiming under it shall at any time hereafter have, claim or demand any right or title to the
aforesaid premises or appurtenances, or any part thereof.
Grantee acceptsthe property in “AS IS, WHERE IS” condition and subject to any
environmental conditions that might have or still exist on said property, and subject to any title
defects and deficiencies, and subject to the right of redemption, if any, provided under the Texas
Property Tax Code. Grantee acknowledgesand agreesthat this conveyance is expressly made
without warranty.
This transaction is in full satisfaction of all taxes, penalties, interest, and costs that have
accrued until the date hereof.
Pro rata taxes for the current year are assumed by Grantee.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, CITY OF LA PORTE, TRUSTEE, for the use and benefit
of itself, LA PORTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HARRIS COUNTY, HARRIS
COUNTY EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT, HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT, PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, HARRISCOUNTY
HOSPITAL DISTRICT and the SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICThas
caused thesepresents to be executed this ________day of ______________________ 2015.
CITY OF LA PORTE, TRUSTEE
LOUIS R. RIGBY,MAYOR,
CITY OF LA PORTE
ACCEPTED:
______________________________
ROY HUNTER
P140
THE STATE OF TEXAS§
§
COUNTY OF HARRIS§
BEFORE ME
, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared LOUIS R.
RIGBY, Mayor, City of La Porte, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executedsame for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and with the conditions and the
limitations therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _______ day of
__________________________, 2015.
________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the
STATE OF TEXAS
My Commission Expires: ____________
THE STATE OF TEXAS§
§
COUNTY OF HARRIS§
BEFORE ME
, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared ROY
HUNTERknown to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged to me that he executed same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and with the conditions andthe limitations therein
stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _______ day of
__________________________, 2015.
________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the
STATE OF TEXAS
My Commission Expires:____________
After Recording
Return To:ROY HUNTER
2829 TEXAS AVENUE
TEXAS CITY, TX 77590
P140
AREA MAP
µ
85
MORGAN'S POINT
LOCATION OF PARCEL
(HCAD #006-166-000-0027)
76
75
59
1 inch = 100 feet
60
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
N/A N/A
Eric Ensey Eric Ensey Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Requested By:
Account Number:Account Number:
Planning & Development Planning & Development
Department:
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
The applicant (Medders Construction) is seeking approval of a Special Conditional Use Permit (SCUP) to allow The applicant (Medders Construction) is seeking approval of a Special Conditional
Use Permit (SCUP) to allow
construction of an offconstruction of an off--site parking lot with covered parking on the property located at the southeast corner of S. site parking lot with covered parking on the
property located at the southeast corner of S.
th
16 Street and W. C Street also described as Lots 1 & 2, Block 789, Town of La Porte as described in the Street and W. C Street also described as Lots 1 & 2, Block 789, Town of La Porte
as described in the
attached ordinance.attached ordinance.
The subject site is a vacant parcel of land with 6,250 square feet (.143 acres) in an area zoned GC, General The subject site is a vacant parcel of land with 6,250 square feet (.143
acres) in an area zoned GC, General
Commercial. The CityCommercial. The Citys commercial use table (Section 106s commercial use table (Section 106--441) allows for off441) allows for off--site parking through consideration
site parking through consideration
of a Special Conditional Use Permit in the GC district. The applicant owns and operates a general contractor of a Special Conditional Use Permit in the GC district. The applicant owns
and operates a general contractor
thth
construction company across the street from this site at 311 S. 16construction company across the street from this site at 311 S. 16 Street. The use of the site is intended to Street.
The use of the site is intended to
provide additional parking of vehicles and flatprovide additional parking of vehicles and flat--bed trailers (wheeled stock). The applicantbed trailers (wheeled stock). The applicants
existing facility does s existing facility does
not have sufficient parking for their fleet.not have sufficient parking for their fleet.not have sufficient parking for their fleet.not have sufficient parking for their fleet.
The ordinance contains a number of conditions intended to ensure that the proposed parking lot is compatible with The ordinance contains a number of conditions intended to ensure that
the proposed parking lot is compatible with
surrounding uses, including the residential development to the east (across the alley). Additionally, the applicant will surrounding uses, including the residential development to the
east (across the alley). Additionally, the applicant will
be required to submit application of a site development plan that will be reviewed by staff for compliance with all be required to submit application of a site development plan that
will be reviewed by staff for compliance with all
applicable requirements outlined in Chapter 106 (Zoning) of the Cityapplicable requirements outlined in Chapter 106 (Zoning) of the Citys Code of Ordinances.s Code of Ordinances.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing at the January 29, 2015, meeting concerning this The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing at the
January 29, 2015, meeting concerning this
request. Two public hearing notice responses were received by the City for the P&Z public hearing; one in favor request. Two public hearing notice responses were received by the City
for the P&Z public hearing; one in favor
from Eugene Ybarra (11022 N. P Street and owners of property in the vicinity) and one in opposition from Martha from Eugene Ybarra (11022 N. P Street and owners of property in the vicinity)
and one in opposition from Martha
thth
Vega (326 S. 15Vega (326 S. 15 Street). The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed SCUP. Street). The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the proposed SCUP.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
1.Conduct public hearing.Conduct public hearing.
2.Consider approval or other action on a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve Consider approval or other action on a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission to approve
Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14--91000003, to allow construction of an off91000003, to allow construction of an off--site parking
lot in the site parking lot in the
GC, General Commercial, district.GC, General Commercial, district.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
N/A N/A
Eric Ensey Eric Ensey Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Requested By:
Account Number:Account Number:
Planning & Development Planning & Development
Department:
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
1. Ordinance1. Ordinance
2. P&Z Recommendation Letter2. P&Z Recommendation Letter
3. SCUP Application3. SCUP Application
4. Area Map4. Area Map
5. Land Use and Zoning Map5. Land Use and Zoning Map
6. Public Response Letters6. Public Response Letters
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
The applicant (Medders Construction) is seeking approval of a Special Conditional Use Permit (SCUP) to allow The applicant (Medders Construction) is seeking approval of a Special Conditional
Use Permit (SCUP) to allow
construction of an offconstruction of an off--site parking lot with covered parking on the property located at the southeast corner of S. site parking lot with covered parking on the
property located at the southeast corner of S.
th
16 Street and W. C Street also described as Lots 1 & 2, Block 789, Town of La Porte as described in the Street and W. C Street also described as Lots 1 & 2, Block 789, Town of La Porte
as described in the
attached ordinance.attached ordinance.
The subject site is a vacant parcel of land with 6,250 square feet (.143 acres) in an area zoned GC, General The subject site is a vacant parcel of land with 6,250 square feet (.143
acres) in an area zoned GC, General
Commercial. The CityCommercial. The Citys commercial use table (Section 106s commercial use table (Section 106--441) allows for off441) allows for off--site parking through consideration
site parking through consideration
of a Special Conditional Use Permit in the GC district. The applicant owns and operates a general contractor of a Special Conditional Use Permit in the GC district. The applicant owns
and operates a general contractor
thththth
construction company across the street from this site at 311 S. 16construction company across the street from this site at 311 S. 16 Street. The use of the site is intended to Street.
The use of the site is intended to
provide additional parking of vehicles and flatprovide additional parking of vehicles and flat--bed trailers (wheeled stock). The applicantbed trailers (wheeled stock). The applicants
existing facility does s existing facility does
not have sufficient parking for their fleet.not have sufficient parking for their fleet.
The ordinance contains a number of conditions intended to ensure that the proposed parking lot is compatible with The ordinance contains a number of conditions intended to ensure that
the proposed parking lot is compatible with
surrounding uses, including the residential development to the east (across the alley). Additionally, the applicant will surrounding uses, including the residential development to the
east (across the alley). Additionally, the applicant will
be required to submit application of a site development plan that will be reviewed by staff for compliance with all be required to submit application of a site development plan that
will be reviewed by staff for compliance with all
applicable requirements outlined in Chapter 106 (Zoning) of the Cityapplicable requirements outlined in Chapter 106 (Zoning) of the Citys Code of Ordinances.s Code of Ordinances.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing at the January 29, 2015, meeting concerning this The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing at the
January 29, 2015, meeting concerning this
request. Two public hearing notice responses were received by the City for the P&Z public hearing; one in favor request. Two public hearing notice responses were received by the City
for the P&Z public hearing; one in favor
from Eugene Ybarra (11022 N. P Street and owners of property in the vicinity) and one in opposition from Martha from Eugene Ybarra (11022 N. P Street and owners of property in the vicinity)
and one in opposition from Martha
thth
Vega (326 S. 15Vega (326 S. 15 Street). The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed SCUP. Street). The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the proposed SCUP.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
1.Conduct public hearing.Conduct public hearing.
2.Consider approval or other action on a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve Consider approval or other action on a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission to approve
Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14Special Conditional Use Permit Request #14--91000003, to allow construction of an off91000003, to allow construction of an offsite parking
lot in site parking lot in
the GC, General Commercial, district.the GC, General Commercial, district.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
AREA MAP
# 14-91000003
µ
MEDDERS
CONSTRUCTION
W C ST
PROPOSED
OFF-SITE
PARKING LOT
1 inch = 100 feet
AREA MAP
# 14-91000003
µ
MEDDERS
CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED
OFF-SITE
PARKING LOT
W C ST
GCR-2
LI
Zoning Legend
MED-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
ZONING
µ
MEDDERS
COM
CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED
OFF-SITE
PARKING LOT
T
W C S
MHDR
LI
COM
Land Use Legend
MID-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
PUBLIC / INSTITUTIONAL
PI
LAND USE
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 23, 2015February 23, 2015AppropriationAppropriation
Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested:
N/A N/A
Corby Alexander Corby Alexander Source of Funds:Source of Funds:
Requested By:
Account Number:Account Number:
Administration Administration
Department:
Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:
Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:
Amount Requested:Amount Requested:
Other:
Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO
Attachments :Attachments :
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
Enterprise Products is in the process of building a plant/facility in MorganEnterprise Products is in the process of building a plant/facility in Morgans Point. The electrical substation
that s Point. The electrical substation that
will support the new facility is being constructed in La Porte. The facility will, on average, require over 1 million will support the new facility is being constructed in La Porte.
The facility will, on average, require over 1 million
gallons of water per day. Neither the City of Morgangallons of water per day. Neither the City of Morgans Point nor the City of s Point nor the City of
La Porte has the capacity furnish 1million plus gallons of potable water per day on average. La Porte has the capacity furnish 1million plus gallons of potable water per day on average.
Consequently, the City has been in discussions with Enterprise Production to provide effluent from the CityConsequently, the City has been in discussions with Enterprise Production
to provide effluent from the Citys
wastewater treatment plant. Staff has been working closely with Enterprise to ensure that we would be able to wastewater treatment plant. Staff has been working closely with Enterprise
to ensure that we would be able to
provide a sufficient flow. This item is placed on the agenda to determine if Council has an interest in moving provide a sufficient flow. This item is placed on the agenda to determine
if Council has an interest in moving
forward with this project at this time. forward with this project at this time.
Should Council choose to move forward staff will work to hammer out a service agreement for Council Should Council choose to move forward staff will work to hammer out a service agreement
for Council Should Council choose to move forward staff will work to hammer out a service agreement for Council Should Council choose to move forward staff will work to hammer out a
service agreement for Council
consideration prior any actual commitment being made to Enterprise. This agreement would require that Enterprise consideration prior any actual commitment being made to Enterprise. This
agreement would require that Enterprise
take the water from the outfall at the plant and be responsible for transporting the water to their location in take the water from the outfall at the plant and be responsible for transporting
the water to their location in
Morgans Point. All of the infrastructure associated with the effluent transport would be Enterprises Point. All of the infrastructure associated with the effluent transport would
be Enterprises s
responsibility. The agreement would also need to spell out the unit cost for the water.responsibility. The agreement would also need to spell out the unit cost for the water.
Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council:
Provide direction to staff on whether to move forward with this project to furnish effluent water to Enterprise Provide direction to staff on whether to move forward with this project
to furnish effluent water to Enterprise
Products.
Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda
Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate
Council Agenda Item
February 23, 2015
9. (a) Receive report of La Porte Development Corporation Board Councilmember Engelken
***********************************************************************************
Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item
February 23, 2015 February 23, 2015
10.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTSADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
La Porte Development Corporation Board Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015La Porte Development Corporation Board Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015
City Council Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015City Council Meeting, Monday, March 9, 2015
City Council Meeting, Monday, March 23, 2015City Council Meeting, Monday, March 23, 2015
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, Thursday, March 19, 2015Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, Thursday, March 19, 2015
Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Thursday, March 26, 2015Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Thursday, March 26, 2015
Citizens Forum on Code Enforcement for the Northside Neighborhood, Tuesday, March 31, Citizens Forum on Code Enforcement for the Northside Neighborhood, Tuesday, March 31,
20152015
regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community
11.COUNCIL COMMENTSCOUNCIL COMMENTS
members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific
factual information
or existing policies or existing policies Councilmembers Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, Martin, Moser, Councilmembers Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, Martin,
Moser,
Kaminski and Mayor RigbyKaminski and Mayor Rigby
12.EXECUTIVE SESSIONEXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should
the need
arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas
Government
Code, in accordance with the authority contained in:Code, in accordance with the authority contained in:
Deliberation concerning the appointment, Deliberation concerning the appointment,
Texas Government Code, Section 551.074Texas Government Code, Section 551.074
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee: employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public
officer or employee:
Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary and Corby Alexander, City ManagerPatrice Fogarty, City Secretary and Corby Alexander, City Manager
into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive
13.RECONVENERECONVENE
session. session.
14.ADJOURNADJOURN
****************************************************************** ******************************************************************