Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-09-15 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item November 9, 2015 November 9, 2015 1.CALL TO ORDERCALL TO ORDER ––The invocation will be given by Brian Christen, La Porte Community Church.The invocation will be given by Brian Christen, La Porte Community Church. 2.INVOCATIONINVOCATION   ––The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie 3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Kaminski.Kaminski.   4.PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONSPRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONS Recognition Recognition -- Employee of the Third Quarter 2015 Employee of the Third Quarter 2015 -- David Hefner (City of La Porte Parks and David Hefner (City of La Porte Parks and (a) Recreation Department) Recreation Department) -- Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby (Limited to five minutes per person.) (Limited to five minutes per person.) 5.PUBLIC COMMENTSPUBLIC COMMENTS ****************************************************************** ****************************************************************** Employee of the Third Quarter: David Hefner, Parks and Recreation Department David is Building Maintenance Supervisor. He uses his experience and skills to trouble shoot facility issues throughout the City. David was instrumental in the renovation of the Recreation & Fitness Center after the flood that occurred in April. David was the first person to receive the early morning phone call from our janitorial contractor that the facility had taken on water. He immediately made his way to the center while calling his supervisor and additional staff for help. David then began working on getting a company out for the clean-up. From there David researched floor tiles, wood flooring, and carpeting so that we were getting the best product for our dollars. Many calls were made and many quotes were compiled. David also used his skills, along with his staff, to work on parts of the renovation so that we could save on expenses. He and his staff worked on routing air conditioning, adding a drop ceiling, painting, adding electrical outlets, etc. The building opened in August and expectations. We are thankful David used his skills and knowledge to help us overcome these unexpected damages. David is a reliable and dependable employee. He has a great deal of skill and continually uses it in an effort to save the city money when possible. He works with a positive attitude and does his best to serve both the internal and external customer in the most cost efficient way. It is my pleasure to congratulate David for being selected as Employee of the Quarter! Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item November 9, 2015 November 9, 2015 6.CONSENT AGENDACONSENT AGENDA (All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by (All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be removed and considered separately.)removed and considered separately.) Consider approval or other action regarding the minutes of the City Council meeting held on Consider approval or other action regarding the minutes of the City Council meeting held on (a) October 26, 2015 October 26, 2015 -- P. Fogarty P. Fogarty Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution of the City Council of the City of (b) La Porte, Texas, casting a ballot for the election of Ed Heathcott to the Board of Directors of La Porte, Texas, casting a ballot for the election of Ed Heathcott to the Board of Directors of the Harris County Appraisal District the Harris County Appraisal District -- P. Fogarty P. Fogarty Consider approval or other action regarding a Memorandum of Agreement with Fairmont Park Consider approval or other action regarding a Memorandum of Agreement with Fairmont Park (c) Homeowners Association for a Community Cooperation Project Homeowners Association for a Community Cooperation Project -- T. Leach T. Leach Consider approval or other action to roll over requested encumbrance from Fiscal Year 2015 Consider approval or other action to roll over requested encumbrance from Fiscal Year 2015 Consider approval or other action to roll over requested encumbrance from Fiscal Year 2015 Consider approval or other action to roll over requested encumbrance from Fiscal Year 2015 (d)(d) to Fiscal Year 2016 to Fiscal Year 2016 -- M. Dolby M. Dolby Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 2 Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 2 (e) "Administration" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of La Porte by revising city policy for "Administration" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of La Porte by revising city policy for renaming of public streets renaming of public streets -- C. Alexander C. Alexander Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance renaming N. 5th Street to Dr. Martin Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance renaming N. 5th Street to Dr. Martin (f) Luther King, Jr., Drive Luther King, Jr., Drive -- C. Alexander C. Alexander Consider approval or other action awarding Bid No. 15017 for Plastic Garbage Bags Consider approval or other action awarding Bid No. 15017 for Plastic Garbage Bags - D. Mick (g) Consider approval or other action regarding the Fiscal Year 2015 audit/asset forfeiture report Consider approval or other action regarding the Fiscal Year 2015 audit/asset forfeiture report (h) and associated financial records as required by Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal and associated financial records as required by Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Procedure -- K. Adcox K. Adcox ****************************************************************** ****************************************************************** REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Appropriation Agenda Date Requested November 9, 2015 Source of Funds: Requested By Patrice Fogarty Account Number: Department: City Secretary Amount Budgeted: Report Resolution: X Ordinance: Amount Requested: Exhibits: Resolution and Certification of Ballot Budgeted Item: YES NO Exhibits: SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The procedures for selecting members of the board of directors of the Harris County Appraisal District are as follows: cities, school districts, junior college districts and conservation & reclamation districts nominate and elect one member to the board of directors by majority vote of the governing body. The process for cities, other than the City of Houston, involves two steps: nomination and election. The City of La Porte is now at the election stage. At the September 28, 2015, City Council meeting, Council adopted a Resolution nominating Ed Heathcott to the Harris County Appraisal District Board of Directors for a two-year term commencing January 1, 2016. Before Council is a Resolution casting the City’s ballot for the election of Mr. Heathcott. This Resolution and Certificate of Ballot must be sent to the Chief Appraiser of the HCAD no later than December 15, 2015. Should Council desire to cast the City’s ballot for Ed Heathcott’s election to the Harris County Appraisal District Board of Directors, for a two-year term commencing January 1, 2016, staff recommends Council adopt this Resolution, and authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Secretary to attest the Certificate of Ballot for Board of Directors Harris County Appraisal District for forwarding to the Harris County Appraisal District. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action of a Resolution casting a ballot vote for the election of Ed Heathcott to the Harris County Appraisal District Board of Directors and authorizing the Mayor to sign the Certificate of Ballot. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date CERTIFICATION OF BALLOT FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT I, LOUIS R. RIGBY, certify that on the 9 th day of November, 2015, the City Council of the City of La Porte did by resolution cast its ballot for the following nominee to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Harris County Appraisal District. Ed Heathcott \[ X \] I further certify that a true and correct copy of the resolution casting such ballot is attached hereto. WITNESS MY HAND this 9 th day of November, 2015. _________________________________ Louis R. Rigby Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM November 9, 2015November 9, 2015AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: General Fund CIPGeneral Fund CIP Traci LeachTraci LeachSource of Funds:Source of Funds: Requested By:Requested By: Account Number:Account Number: AdministrationAdministration Department:Department: $20,000.00$20,000.00 Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: $5,000.00$5,000.00 Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1. Memorandum of Agreement for Fairmont Memorandum of Agreement for Fairmont Park Homeowners AssociationPark Homeowners Association 2. Email from Homeowners Association Email from Homeowners Association PresidentPresident 3. Equipment Quote Equipment Quote SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS As part of the FY 2016 budget, the Council approved funding for Community CoAs part of the FY 2016 budget, the Council approved funding for Community Co--op projects, where the op projects, where the City would partner with HOAs and other neighborhood groups to complete small beautification and City would partner with HOAs and other neighborhood groups to complete small beautification and quality of life projects.  A total of $20,000 was budgeted with a maximum City contribution per project of quality of life projects.  A total of $20,000 was budgeted with a maximum City contribution per project of $5,000.  All projects would be considered on a first come, first served basis.  At this time, staff is $5,000.  All projects would be considered on a first come, first served basis.  At this time, staff is working with several groups on potential projects; Bayside Terrace Civic Club HOA had a project working with several groups on potential projects; Bayside Terrace Civic Club HOA had a project approved for $5,000 in October 2015, and Bay Point Townhomes is currently in process (but not approved for $5,000 in October 2015, and Bay Point Townhomes is currently in process (but not approved by the Council) as well, which leaves an available balance of $10,000 this year.approved by the Council) as well, which leaves an available balance of $10,000 this year.   Fairmont Park HOA has obtained a quote for picnic tables, trash cans, benches, and BBQ pits (three for Fairmont Park HOA has obtained a quote for picnic tables, trash cans, benches, and BBQ pits (three for each type of equipment).  The quote attached for this equipment is from a Buy Board vendor, so this each type of equipment).  The quote attached for this equipment is from a Buy Board vendor, so this each type of equipment).  The quote attached for this equipment is from a Buy Board vendor, so this each type of equipment).  The quote attached for this equipment is from a Buy Board vendor, so this pricing is set and no additional quotes are required.  Additionally, there is approximately 400 feet of pricing is set and no additional quotes are required.  Additionally, there is approximately 400 feet of fencing along Collingswood Dr. that the HOA would like included in the project. The fencing component fencing along Collingswood Dr. that the HOA would like included in the project. The fencing component of the project will require additional solicitation of quotes.  However, the Fairmont HOA has indicated it of the project will require additional solicitation of quotes.  However, the Fairmont HOA has indicated it would cover any portion of the fence quote that was above the Citywould cover any portion of the fence quote that was above the City’’s maximum contribution amount of s maximum contribution amount of $5,000.    The total project cost is estimated to be $10,000.  The HOA is asking for the City to contribute $5,000, The total project cost is estimated to be $10,000.  The HOA is asking for the City to contribute $5,000, the maximum available for the project.  Pursuant to the attached Memorandum of Agreement, the City the maximum available for the project.  Pursuant to the attached Memorandum of Agreement, the City will handle the procurement and installation of the improvements.  Fairmont HOA will provide a check to will handle the procurement and installation of the improvements.  Fairmont HOA will provide a check to the City for the HOA share of the project within 30 days of execution of the Agreement.the City for the HOA share of the project within 30 days of execution of the Agreement.   As this would be an addition to a CityAs this would be an addition to a City--owned and maintained facility, the onowned and maintained facility, the on--going maintenance going maintenance responsibility would lie with the City.  Estimated maintenance costs are expected to be minimal, as the responsibility would lie with the City.  Estimated maintenance costs are expected to be minimal, as the life of the proposed improvements are somewhere in the 10life of the proposed improvements are somewhere in the 10--15 year range.  15 year range.  Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action of a Memorandum of Agreement with Fairmont Park HOA for a Consider approval or other action of a Memorandum of Agreement with Fairmont Park HOA for a community cooperation project (park amenities and fence replacement) for a total City contribution of community cooperation project (park amenities and fence replacement) for a total City contribution of $5,000. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is made by and entered into this ____ day of November, 2015 (the Effective Date) between the City of La Porte, a home-rule municipality under the laws of the State of Texas (the City) and the Fairmont Park Homeowners Association (FPHOA) Cooperation Project, as defined herein. The terms acceptable to both Parties to begin the Community Cooperation Project are as follows: The City and FPHOA agree that the Community Cooperation Project shall consist of procurement and installation of Procurement and installation of three (3) picnic tables, three (3) trash cans, three (3) benches, and three (3) barbecue pits. along Collingswood Dr. The City shall be responsible for the construction and installation of the Improvements. The City agrees to fund a sum not to exceed $5,000.00 for construction and installation of the Improvements. In no instance shall exceed $5,000. The City shall be responsible for all future maintenance of the Improvements and agrees to fund the all costs associated with same. and provision of electrical service, FPHOA agrees to pay the City a sum of 5,000.00, to be applied to the cost of construction and installation of the Improvements. In addition, FPHOA shall provide its share of the funding for the Improvements within 30 calendar days of the Effective Date of this MOA. If FPHOA City reserves the right to terminate the agreement immediately. Should additional funds be necessary to complete the Improvements, the FPHOA agrees to consider either funding the additional amount or reducing the scope of Improvements. Any modification in scope shall be formalized with an amendment to this Agreement. This MOA constitutes the complete understanding between the parties in order to begin the procurement and installation process for the Improvements. For the City of La Porte: _______________________ ______________________ Corby D. Alexander Attest: Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary City Manager For the Fairmont Park Homeowners Association: _______________________ Jo Ann Pitzer, President Leach, Traci From:Jo Ann Pitzer <jpitzerfphoa@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, October 22, 2015 5:05 PM To:Leach, Traci Cc:Bradley, Scott; White, Ronnie Re: Fairmont Park Homes Association Joint Venture Subject: Traci, Thank you for your quick response. The HOA will contribute $5,000. If there an amount over $10,000, the HOA will pay the difference. Best regards, Jo Ann Pitzer Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:35 PM, Leach, Traci <LeachT@laportetx.gov> wrote: JoAnn: Iaminreceiptofthisrequest.Iunderstandtherearequotesalreadyfortheproposedimprovements.I amtentativelyschedulingyourprojectforCouncilconsiderationforNovember9. Iamcalculatingatotalcostof$10,000.HowmuchistheHOAproposingtocontributetotheproject cost? Thankssomuch Traci CƩƚƒʹJoAnnPitzer\[mailto:jpitzerfphoa@yahoo.com\] {ĻƓƷʹThursday,October22,20157:47AM ƚʹLeach,Traci<LeachT@laportetx.gov> /ĭʹBradley,Scott<BradleyS@laportetx.gov>;White,Ronnie<WhiteR@laportetx.gov> {ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹFairmontParkHomesAssociationJointVenture Traci, Fairmont Park Homes Association would like to enter into a joint venture with the City of La Porte. Items that we desire for the Fairmont Park on Hillridge include picnic tables, trash cans, benches, BBQ Pit and fence replacement. As always, thank you for your assistance. Jo Ann Pitzer President Fairmont Park Homes Association jpitzerfphoa@yahoo.com 1 People don't care how much you know until they know how much you care 2 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Appropriation Agenda Date Requested: November 9, 2015 Source of Funds: Various Requested By: Michael Dolby Account Number: Various Department: Finance Amount Budgeted: YES Report: X Resolution: Ordinance: Amount Requested: Exhibits: Encumbrance Rollover Report Budgeted Item: YES X NO Exhibits: Exhibits: SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The City’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. There are 36 outstanding purchase orders staff is requesting to roll- over. The purchase orders represent goods that are ordered and budgeted funds committed to procure items necessary to operate the City. A breakdown of the open purchase orders, encumbrances and budget roll-over requests by operating fund are as follows: FundNumberAmount General Fund22$ 257,147.28 Utility Fund 214,620.00 Vehicle Replacement Fund2530,997.88 LPAWA Fund128,431.57 Grant Fund32,796.61 Emergency Services District Fund459,445.55 Hotel Motel Fund117,625.00 Economic Development Fund115,000.00 Totals36$ 926,063.89 The above encumbrances will not have an impact on the projected working capital balances for fiscal year 2016 because they were budgeted in the fiscal year 2015, and following approval by council, the system will automatically increase each line item. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action for the encumbrance roll over request. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby Alexander, City Manager Date 001C13116Bear Land Surveying Company3,500.00Professional Survey Services001-9090-519-5007Planning and Engineering001140162Cobb Fendley & Associates8,050.00Professional Engineering Services001-9090-51 9-5007Planning and Engineering001150376R.C. Chuoke and Associates5,050.00Professional Appraisal Services001-6146-515-5013Planning and Engineering001150508City of Houston180.00Radio Airtime001-6054-51 0-4003Emergency Management 009150207Freightliner of Austin93,406.33Trash Trucks with Picker009-7072-532-8050Pulblic Works-Solidwaste 429.00Animal Cremations and Disposal001-5258-521-5007Police Support Services 001150012Centurylink Communications LLC 2,004.00Managed Exchange001-6066-519-5007Information Technology001150087Dell Financial Services1,886.28Computer Hardware001-6066-519-2093Information Technology001150181Sungard Public Sector66,990.21Computer Software001-6066-519-5007Information Technology001150475Dell Financial Services15,861.86Dell Lease Payment001-6066-519-2093Information Technology001150498PEXX, Inc.9,375.00Maintenance and repair of Traffic Camera System001-6066-519-4050Information Technology001150506Convergint Technologies534.81Relocate 2 card readers001-6066-519-5 007Information Technology001150507Datavox7,428.00Computer Hardware001-6066-519-2093Information Technology001150507Datavox2,135.16Computer Hardware001-6066-519-4050Information Technology 002150482Sander Engineering Corp.9,500.00Professional Services to Evaluate Blower002-7087-532-5007Wastewater Treatment 032150088Valley Innovative Services1,494.01Seniors Meal Program032-8082-551-5007Parks-Special Services 016150447Industrial networking Solutions28,431.57Upgrade Communication Network to Cellular016-7075-533-8021Public Works-LPAWA FundNumberVendor NameAmountDescriptionAccount NumberDepartment 001150130Irma Mata945.00Interpreter Services001-6064-512-5007Municipal Court032150050Harris County Treasurer852.60SETCIC Monthly Payment032-6064-512-4081Municipal Court032150076Sonya Cates450.00Consultant Fees032-6064-512-5007Municipal Court 001150186Freese and Nichols14,880.00Facilitation of La Porte DPW Self Assessment001-6060-510-5004City Manager 001140542City of Houston4,045.00Radio Programming and Fleet Mapping001-5253-521-4003Police Patrol 001150513ISI Contracting18,000.00Repair Bridge Walkway and Safety Rail001-7071-531-4015Public Works 002150312Sungard Public Sector5,120.00Training for Employees002-6147-515-3020Utility Billing 001150503JTB Services, Inc.35,023.00Demolition of Properties001-9092-524-6021Inspections 001150023Lynn Ross Smith & Gannaway1,080.00Legal Services001-6068-515-5004Legal 034140546Consolidated Traffic Controls49,928.75Installation and Equipment for Intersection Lights034-5059-522-8021EMS 001150474Casco Industries24,197.00Protective Fire Wear001-5051-522-2003Fire009150052Sutphen Corp.437,591.55Fire Truck009-5051-522-8050Fire 001150104HDR Engineering, Inc.500.00Online GIS001-9091-519-5007GIS001150217HDR Engineering, Inc.35,052.96GIS Technical Services001-9091-519-5007GIS For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2015 ENCUMBRANCE ROLLOVER REPORT CITY OF LAPORTE 257,147.2814,620.00530,997.8828,431.573Grant Fund2,796.61 P. O Encumbrance S:\\Finance Share\\AGENDA ITEMS\\11.09.2015\\Encumbrance Rollover List FY 2015.xlsx 001150198Cabredon Cremations and Animal Disp o 2Total Vehicle Replacement Fun d 22Total General Fun d 2Total Utility Fun d 1LPAW A 038140474Richard Design Services15,000.00Development Project038-6030-565-9997Administration-Economic Development otel Operations 037140032Bayshore Chamber of Commerce17,625.00Tourism Services - Hotel Motel Tax Revenue037-6063-565-6016Administration-Hotel/M FundNumberVendor NameAmountDescriptionAccount NumberDepartment 034150488Dooley Tackaberry4,156.80Akron Assault Nozzle034-5051-522-4002Fire034150493Metro Fire Apparatus Special2,460.00Fire Hose034-5051-522-4002Fire034150500Casco Industries, Inc.2,900.00Cairns Helmets034-5051-522-2003Fire For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2015 ENCUMBRANCE ROLLOVER REPORT CITY OF LAPORTE 1Hotel/Motel Fund17,625.0015,000.00$926,063.89 P. O Encumbrance 59,445.5 5 S:\\Finance Share\\AGENDA ITEMS\\11.09.2015\\Encumbrance Rollover List FY 2015.xlsx 36Total Encumbrance s 4Emergency Services Fun d 1Economic Developmen t REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM November 9, 2015November 9, 2015AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: N/AN/A Corby AlexanderCorby AlexanderSource of Funds:Source of Funds: Requested By:Requested By: Account Number:Account Number: AdministrationAdministration Department:Department: Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1. Marked Version of Ordinance Marked Version of Ordinance 2. Clean Version of Ordinance Clean Version of Ordinance 3. Ordinance Ordinance SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS At the October 26, 2015 meeting, City Council directed staff to amend At the October 26, 2015 meeting, City Council directed staff to amend Section 2.1 (c)(10) Policy for Section 2.1 (c)(10) Policy for in the Code of Ordinances to remove the word in the Code of Ordinances to remove the word ””notarizednotarized””from the requirements from the requirements Naming City FacilitiesNaming City Facilities of  the list submitted for consideration of any street renaming.  It was determined that the requirement of  the list submitted for consideration of any street renaming.  It was determined that the requirement was vague and did not contribute to the verification of names on the petition list for the purposes of was vague and did not contribute to the verification of names on the petition list for the purposes of renaming a street.  This agenda item includes both the markedrenaming a street.  This agenda item includes both the marked--up and clean version of this section.     up and clean version of this section.      Staff recommends approval of the amendment to Staff recommends approval of the amendment to in Section 2.1 (c)(10)Section 2.1 (c)(10)Policy for Naming City FacilitiesPolicy for Naming City Facilities the Code of Ordinances.the Code of Ordinances. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action amending Chapter 2 Consider approval or other action amending Chapter 2 ““AdministrationAdministration””of the Code of Ordinances by of the Code of Ordinances by revising city policy for renaming of public streets.revising city policy for renaming of public streets. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate {Ļĭ͵ ЋΏЊ͵ Ώ tƚƌźĭǤ ŅƚƩ ƓğƒźƓŭ ĭźƷǤ ŅğĭźƌźƷźĻƭ͵ (a)Purpose. To establish guidelines and procedures for the naming of municipal facilities or donation of a memorial tree with plaque. (b)Procedures. (1) To initiate the naming process, an application should be requested from and returned to the city secretary's office. A set of procedures and guidelines will accompany each application for completion. (2) A standing committee, appointed by council and composed of Councilmembers from the three at-large positions (mayor, position "A," and position "B"), will consider all applications and provide recommendations. (3) The council committee will present their recommendation to the full city council to consider the naming of the city facility or parkland. (4) Generally, municipal facilities will be named immediately prior to or during development of the facilities. (c) Guidelines. (1) In honor of individuals who donate land for park space or donate a major part of the funds required to construct or renovate a facility. A minimum of 50 percent or more of the total funds is necessary to constitute a major portion. (2) Outstanding and/or predominant historical features of significance. Historical features will include the names of early residents or citizens and/or events of significance to the area's development. (3) In honor of deceased local community leaders. Deceased local community leaders must have served in an elected or appointed position of the city. These leaders must have provided outstanding personal service that has resulted in a significant and enduring contribution to the community and have been deceased for a minimum of five years. (4) In honor of deceased national or state leaders. Deceased national or state leaders must have directly impacted the citizens of the city and have been deceased for a minimum of five years. (5) In relation to outstanding and/or predominant geographical characteristics or physical features of the land. such as streams, rivers, plant species, etc. Geographical and physical features will include those naturally occurring. (i.e., vegetation materials, streams, rivers, creeks, lakes or forested areas), and those man-made, (i.e., subdivisions, streets, office/industrial complexes or other commercial areas). (6) In relation to a street or streets adjacent to the facility or parkland. (7) In relation to a subdivision that houses the facility or is adjacent to the parkland. (8) Municipal recreation centers that are a part of or lie within the boundaries of a park shall bear the name of that park unless the park name cannot be incorporated in the facility name. (9) Municipal facilities may be given the same name as a school site, where the sites abut one another. (10) Renaming of a public street. Renaming of a public street shall require the concurrence from a minimum of 75 percent of the property owners abutting the proposed street. Persons and/or groups submitting street names for consideration shall be required to provide a notarized list of concurring property owners and to defray the cost (at least 60 percent) of installing signs and other expenses (i.e. maps, plats, 911, etc.) Streets in newly platted subdivisions or streets that have not been developed are exempt from this policy. (11) Renaming of a municipal facility. Renaming of municipal facilities may be considered if exceptional circumstances exist, but should not be a common practice. In such circumstances, care must be taken to avoid renaming because the purpose of the prior naming had become obscured over time (and thus eliminate appropriate recognition or honor). (12) Donation of a tree for city park or facility. If more appropriate for the circumstances, a request may be presented to plant a tree in memory of the significant contributor. A small plaque (no larger than 12 inches by 12 inches) will be placed at the foot of the tree with name, date(s), and honored contribution to the community. The plaque tğŭĻ Њ must be installed to grade. This memorial shall follow the same recommended guidelines as for naming a facility. (d)Definitions. Civic contribution criteria. Individuals selected within this category shall have been deceased for a minimum of five years and shall have been selected based on many years of service to the community and in consideration of their positive impact on the development and well being of the entire community. These nominations should be made objectively, without consideration to illness, misfortune, or incidents creating emotional responses. Organizations should be nominated according to the same criteria. Facilities. A municipal facility or municipal facilities shall be any real properties that are owned by the city of such as, but not limited to public buildings, parks, streets, or any other city-owned structures or property. Financial benefactor criteria. Individuals (deceased), organizations, or entities nominated under this category shall make, or have made, a significant financial contribution toward a facility. Significant financial contributions will be measured also by the impact a single contribution makes toward the successful conclusion of or continuing operation of the facility to be named. Depending on the impact, the naming could be for the entire facility or some portion (i.e., a room). Historical/symbolic criteria. Facilities may be named for individuals, families, organizations or entities who, for historical or symbolic reasons, have contributed to the community. Nominated individuals shall have been deceased for a minimum of five years. When considering individuals or families under this category, criteria will include their character, service to the community, leadership and inspiration to others. inated according to the same criteria. (Ord. No. 2000-2443, § 1, 10-23-00) tğŭĻ Ћ {Ļĭ͵ ЋΏЊ͵ Ώ tƚƌźĭǤ ŅƚƩ ƓğƒźƓŭ ĭźƷǤ ŅğĭźƌźƷźĻƭ͵ (a)Purpose. To establish guidelines and procedures for the naming of municipal facilities or donation of a memorial tree with plaque. (b)Procedures. (1) To initiate the naming process, an application should be requested from and returned to the city secretary's office. A set of procedures and guidelines will accompany each application for completion. (2) A standing committee, appointed by council and composed of Councilmembers from the three at-large positions (mayor, position "A," and position "B"), will consider all applications and provide recommendations. (3) The council committee will present their recommendation to the full city council to consider the naming of the city facility or parkland. (4) Generally, municipal facilities will be named immediately prior to or during development of the facilities. (c) Guidelines. (1) In honor of individuals who donate land for park space or donate a major part of the funds required to construct or renovate a facility. A minimum of 50 percent or more of the total funds is necessary to constitute a major portion. (2) Outstanding and/or predominant historical features of significance. Historical features will include the names of early residents or citizens and/or events of significance to the area's development. (3) In honor of deceased local community leaders. Deceased local community leaders must have served in an elected or appointed position of the city. These leaders must have provided outstanding personal service that has resulted in a significant and enduring contribution to the community and have been deceased for a minimum of five years. (4) In honor of deceased national or state leaders. Deceased national or state leaders must have directly impacted the citizens of the city and have been deceased for a minimum of five years. (5) In relation to outstanding and/or predominant geographical characteristics or physical features of the land. such as streams, rivers, plant species, etc. Geographical and physical features will include those naturally occurring. (i.e., vegetation materials, streams, rivers, creeks, lakes or forested areas), and those man-made, (i.e., subdivisions, streets, office/industrial complexes or other commercial areas). (6) In relation to a street or streets adjacent to the facility or parkland. (7) In relation to a subdivision that houses the facility or is adjacent to the parkland. (8) Municipal recreation centers that are a part of or lie within the boundaries of a park shall bear the name of that park unless the park name cannot be incorporated in the facility name. (9) Municipal facilities may be given the same name as a school site, where the sites abut one another. (10) Renaming of a public street. Renaming of a public street shall require the concurrence from a minimum of 75 percent of the property owners abutting the proposed street. Persons and/or groups submitting street names for consideration shall be required to provide a list of concurring property owners and to defray the cost (at least 60 percent) of installing signs and other expenses (i.e. maps, plats, 911, etc.) Streets in newly platted subdivisions or streets that have not been developed are exempt from this policy. (11) Renaming of a municipal facility. Renaming of municipal facilities may be considered if exceptional circumstances exist, but should not be a common practice. In such circumstances, care must be taken to avoid renaming because the purpose of the prior naming had become obscured over time (and thus eliminate appropriate recognition or honor). (12) Donation of a tree for city park or facility. If more appropriate for the circumstances, a request may be presented to plant a tree in memory of the significant contributor. A small plaque (no larger than 12 inches by 12 inches) will be placed at the foot of the tree with name, date(s), and honored contribution to the community. The plaque tğŭĻ Њ must be installed to grade. This memorial shall follow the same recommended guidelines as for naming a facility. (d)Definitions. Civic contribution criteria. Individuals selected within this category shall have been deceased for a minimum of five years and shall have been selected based on many years of service to the community and in consideration of their positive impact on the development and well being of the entire community. These nominations should be made objectively, without consideration to illness, misfortune, or incidents creating emotional responses. Organizations should be nominated according to the same criteria. Facilities. A municipal facility or municipal facilities shall be any real properties that are owned by the city of such as, but not limited to public buildings, parks, streets, or any other city-owned structures or property. Financial benefactor criteria. Individuals (deceased), organizations, or entities nominated under this category shall make, or have made, a significant financial contribution toward a facility. Significant financial contributions will be measured also by the impact a single contribution makes toward the successful conclusion of or continuing operation of the facility to be named. Depending on the impact, the naming could be for the entire facility or some portion (i.e., a room). Historical/symbolic criteria. Facilities may be named for individuals, families, organizations or entities who, for historical or symbolic reasons, have contributed to the community. Nominated individuals shall have been deceased for a minimum of five years. When considering individuals or families under this category, criteria will include their character, service to the community, leadership and inspiration to others. inated according to the same criteria. (Ord. No. 2000-2443, § 1, 10-23-00) tğŭĻ Ћ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM November 9, 2015November 9, 2015AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Corby AlexanderCorby Alexander Requested By:Requested By: Account Number:Account Number: AdministrationAdministration Department:Department: Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Other:N/AN/A Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1. Petition Petition 2. Map Map 3. Ordinance Ordinance SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS This item was tabled at the October 26, 2015 meeting to allow staff time to obtain legal direction This item was tabled at the October 26, 2015 meeting to allow staff time to obtain legal direction regarding the ordinance language requiring a notarized list.  On tonightregarding the ordinance language requiring a notarized list.  On tonight’’s agenda, the Council will s agenda, the Council will consider an amended ordinance that eliminates the requirement for a notarized list for the purposes of consider an amended ordinance that eliminates the requirement for a notarized list for the purposes of street renaming.  street renaming.   Pursuant to local ordinance, as amended tonight, the La Porte Community Civic Club has circulated a Pursuant to local ordinance, as amended tonight, the La Porte Community Civic Club has circulated a thth petition to rename a portion on North 5petition to rename a portion on North 5 Street to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive.  The petition has Street to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive.  The petition has thth been signed by 75% of the adjoining property owners along North 5been signed by 75% of the adjoining property owners along North 5 Street to Barbours Cut.  Street to Barbours Cut.  thththth Staff recommends approval of the requested street name change of North 5Staff recommends approval of the requested street name change of North 5 Street to Dr. Martin Luther Street to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive from Main Street north to BarbourKing, Jr. Drive from Main Street north to Barbour’’s Cut.s Cut. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: thth Consider approval or other action authorizing change of North 5Consider approval or other action authorizing change of North 5 Street from Main to Barbours Cut to Street from Main to Barbours Cut to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive.Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate AREA MAP PROPOSED DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DR. (W. MAIN ST. to BARBOUR'S CUT BLVD.) VD UT BL OURS C BARB W T N S DISO W MA ST W TYLER W ADAMS ST ST W POLK ST MAIN W W A ST REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM November 9, 2015November 9, 2015AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: General FundGeneral Fund David MickDavid MickSource of Funds:Source of Funds: Requested By:Requested By: 001.7072.532.2015001.7072.532.2015 Public WorksPublic WorksAccount Number:Account Number: Department:Department: $137,628.00$137,628.00 Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: Amount Amount Other: $123,200.00$123,200.00 Requested:Requested: AttachmentsAttachments : : Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO 1. Bid Tabulation Bid Tabulation 2. Bidder's List: Public Purchase Access Bidder's List: Public Purchase Access ReportReport SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS The City’s solid waste ordinance (Section 58s solid waste ordinance (Section 58--36) stipulates that residential solid waste customers use 36) stipulates that residential solid waste customers use plastic garbage bags provided by the City.  The City orders 27,500 rolls of garbage bags most years.  plastic garbage bags provided by the City.  The City orders 27,500 rolls of garbage bags most years.  Each residential account is eligible for 3 free rolls of bags per year and residents may purchase Each residential account is eligible for 3 free rolls of bags per year and residents may purchase additional rolls throughout the year if needed.   additional rolls throughout the year if needed.    This year staff bid 33This year staff bid 33--gallon bags for City Councilgallon bags for City Council’’s consideration in addition to the 30s consideration in addition to the 30--gallon sized bags gallon sized bags historically provided by the city.  Staff is occasionally asked by a residential customer to consider a historically provided by the city.  Staff is occasionally asked by a residential customer to consider a larger garbage bag that will better fit a 32larger garbage bag that will better fit a 32--gallon can.   gallon can.    The sealed bid (Bid #15017) for plastic garbage bags was opened and read on October 15, 2015.  The The sealed bid (Bid #15017) for plastic garbage bags was opened and read on October 15, 2015.  The bid notification was accessed online by 25 vendors, with 5 returning bids.  The request for bids was also bid notification was accessed online by 25 vendors, with 5 returning bids.  The request for bids was also bid notification was accessed online by 25 vendors, with 5 returning bids.  The request for bids was also bid notification was accessed online by 25 vendors, with 5 returning bids.  The request for bids was also advertised in the Bay Area Observer and posted on the City website.   advertised in the Bay Area Observer and posted on the City website.    The lowest and best bid was submitted by Central Poly Bag Corporation at $3.99 per roll of 30The lowest and best bid was submitted by Central Poly Bag Corporation at $3.99 per roll of 30--gallon gallon bags (12% less than last yearbags (12% less than last year’’s $4.55 per roll bid) and $4.48 per roll of 33s $4.55 per roll bid) and $4.48 per roll of 33--gallon bags (1.5% less than gallon bags (1.5% less than last year’s $4.55 bid per roll for the smaller 30s $4.55 bid per roll for the smaller 30--gallon size).  Both the 30gallon size).  Both the 30--gallon and 33gallon and 33--gallon bags are gallon bags are 1.5 mil thick and come 521.5 mil thick and come 52--bags per roll which is unchanged from prior years.  The bag dimensions are bags per roll which is unchanged from prior years.  The bag dimensions are 30”x 37”and 39and 39””x 40x 40””for the 30for the 30--gallon and 33gallon and 33--gallon bag respectively.   gallon bag respectively.    The FY 15-16 budget for this item is $137,628.  For 27,500 rolls of either size, the cost is $109,750 for 16 budget for this item is $137,628.  For 27,500 rolls of either size, the cost is $109,750 for 30-gallon bags and $123,200 for 33gallon bags and $123,200 for 33--gallon bags.  The difference in cost is $13,450.   The FY 16 budget gallon bags.  The difference in cost is $13,450.   The FY 16 budget can accommodate either size.   can accommodate either size.    Other Considerations: Other Considerations:  The City’s cost to supply garbage bags has noticeably increased over the last fives cost to supply garbage bags has noticeably increased over the last five--years and is likely to years and is likely to increase again when oil prices rebound. increase again when oil prices rebound.  Solid Waste performed a hang test on sample bags provided by the proposed vendor and confirmed Solid Waste performed a hang test on sample bags provided by the proposed vendor and confirmed that the vendorthat the vendor’’s bag has adequate strength.  The hang test consists of placing 75s bag has adequate strength.  The hang test consists of placing 75--lbs of sand inside lbs of sand inside the bag and hanging the bag for a minimum of two minutes.   the bag and hanging the bag for a minimum of two minutes.    Staff supports either bag size option (30Staff supports either bag size option (30--gallon or 33gallon or 33--gallon).  The action item is written to approve the gallon).  The action item is written to approve the larger bags considering that some of the city residents will find the larger bag to be more convenient for larger bags considering that some of the city residents will find the larger bag to be more convenient for the resident’s use. s use.  Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action awarding Bid No. 15017 for 27,500 rolls of 1.5 mil garbage bags to Consider approval or other action awarding Bid No. 15017 for 27,500 rolls of 1.5 mil garbage bags to Central Poly Bag for 33Central Poly Bag for 33--gallon sized bags in the amount of $123,200. gallon sized bags in the amount of $123,200.  Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate Access Report AgencyCity of La Porte (TX) Bid Number15017 Bid TitlePLASTIC GARBAGE BAGS Vendor NameAccessed First TimeMost Recent Access BidClerk2015-10-13 12:38 AM CDT2015-10-13 12:38 AM CDT x-l plastics inc2015-10-07 09:51 AM CDT2015-10-12 09:18 AM CDT Alta One, LLC2015-10-06 10:40 PM CDT2015-10-14 03:36 PM CDT WasteZero, Inc2015-09-28 07:52 AM CDT2015-10-12 08:20 AM CDT CENTRAL POLY-BAG CORP. 2015-09-24 10:15 AM CDT2015-10-12 09:42 AM CDT Platinum Paper and Packaging2015-10-07 12:48 PM CDT2015-10-07 12:55 PM CDT Hillyard, Inc.2015-10-07 04:50 PM CDT2015-10-12 04:07 PM CDT All American 2015-09-24 09:59 AM CDT2015-09-24 10:00 AM CDT Onvia2015-09-24 01:17 PM CDT2015-10-13 03:53 AM CDT Grand Cayon Minority Contractors Association and iSqFt Planroom Partnership2015-09-25 01:28 AM CDT2015-09-25 01:28 AM CDT Taylor Distribution Group2015-09-30 10:15 PM CDT2015-09-30 10:15 PM CDT Discount Plastic Bags and Packaging LLC2015-10-01 09:52 AM CDT2015-10-12 11:48 AM CDT Metroclean2015-09-29 02:30 PM CDT2015-09-29 02:30 PM CDT Contract Paper Group, Inc.2015-09-25 07:16 AM CDT2015-09-25 08:12 AM CDT DYNA PAK CORP2015-09-24 09:33 AM CDT2015-09-24 09:34 AM CDT Competitive Choice2015-10-01 03:54 PM CDT2015-10-08 11:42 AM CDT Perkens WS Corporation2015-09-28 01:18 AM CDT2015-10-15 12:34 AM CDT Pollock Paper Distributors2015-09-25 08:20 AM CDT2015-09-25 08:23 AM CDT HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE, LTD.2015-10-01 01:17 PM CDT2015-10-01 01:18 PM CDT Kleen Janitorial Supply Co2015-10-07 10:13 AM CDT2015-10-13 07:51 AM CDT The Blue Book Building & Construction Network2015-09-24 11:34 AM CDT2015-10-06 12:42 AM CDT Calico Industries, Inc.2015-10-12 09:57 AM CDT2015-10-12 09:57 AM CDT WEBB'S PROFESSIONAL FLOOR BUFFING AND CARPET CLEANING SERVICES2015-10-07 01:08 PM CDT2015-10-07 01:08 PM CDT North America Procurement Council2015-09-28 09:14 AM CDT2015-10-05 10:05 AM CDT Cordell Inc. 2015-10-14 08:30 AM CDT2015-10-14 08:30 AM CDT Safeway Supply, Inc.2015-10-06 07:10 PM CDT2015-10-06 07:15 PM CDT Calico Industries of Florida LLC2015-09-25 07:54 AM CDT2015-09-25 07:54 AM CDT Interboro Packaging Corporation2015-09-24 11:14 AM CDT2015-10-15 12:53 PM CDT Royal Media Network2015-10-02 05:20 PM CDT2015-10-13 11:52 AM CDT Unipak Corp.2015-09-24 11:11 AM CDT2015-10-12 09:05 AM CDT Jadcore, Inc.2015-09-24 11:12 AM CDT2015-10-12 03:29 PM CDT Tukmol General Contractor2015-10-01 04:10 AM CDT2015-10-01 04:10 AM CDT AFP INDUSTRIES, INC. 2015-09-25 06:27 AM CDT2015-09-25 06:27 AM CDT DocumentsMost Recent Response Date #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf 2015-10-07 10:22 AM CDT #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf #15017 Addendum No. 1.docx.pdf #15017 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf 2015-10-12 03:29 PM CDT REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM November 9, 2015November 9, 2015AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: N/AN/A Kenith AdcoxKenith AdcoxSource of Funds:Source of Funds: Requested By:Requested By: Account Number:Account Number: PolicePolice Department:Department: Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1. FY 2015 Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture FY 2015 Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture Report by Law Enforcement Agency and Report by Law Enforcement Agency and related Financial Records related Financial Records SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS Per Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 59.06 (g) (1), Per Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 59.06 (g) (1), ““All law enforcement All law enforcement agencies and attorneys representing the state who receive proceeds or property under this chapter agencies and attorneys representing the state who receive proceeds or property under this chapter shall account for the seizure, forfeiture, receipt, and specific expenditure of all such proceeds in an shall account for the seizure, forfeiture, receipt, and specific expenditure of all such proceeds in an audit, which is to be performed annually by the commissioners court or governing body of a audit, which is to be performed annually by the commissioners court or governing body of a municipality, as appropriate.municipality, as appropriate.””         In accordance with this requirement, a completed FY 2015 Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture Audit Report By In accordance with this requirement, a completed FY 2015 Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture Audit Report By Law Enforcement Agency is attached, along with a summary of the fund balance, revenues and Law Enforcement Agency is attached, along with a summary of the fund balance, revenues and expenditures provided by the Finance Department, a financial print out for all revenues and expenditures expenditures provided by the Finance Department, a financial print out for all revenues and expenditures reported under the state seizure project number (SZST) and copies of all expenditure receipts are reported under the state seizure project number (SZST) and copies of all expenditure receipts are attached for council review.attached for council review.attached for council review.attached for council review. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action of the attached FY 2015 audit/asset forfeiture report and associated Consider approval or other action of the attached FY 2015 audit/asset forfeiture report and associated financial records as required by Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.financial records as required by Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM November 9, 2015November 9, 2015AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: Reinsurance Reinsurance Matt HartleibMatt Hartleib Requested By:Requested By: Source of Funds:Source of Funds: PremiumsPremiums Human ResourcesHuman Resources Department:Department: 0146144515601201461445156012 Account Number:Account Number: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: 409,176.00409,176.00 Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Other: 409,176.00409,176.00 Amount Requested:Amount Requested: AttachmentsAttachments : : Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO 1. Stop Loss Renewal Analysis Stop Loss Renewal Analysis 2. Claims History Claims History SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS The City purchases stop loss insurance to protect against high claims exposure.  Specific stop loss The City purchases stop loss insurance to protect against high claims exposure.  Specific stop loss covers individual member claims in excess of $165,000.  The City is reimbursed for any claims in covers individual member claims in excess of $165,000.  The City is reimbursed for any claims in excess of $165,000.  Aggregate insurance covers the entire health plan claims and will reimburse if excess of $165,000.  Aggregate insurance covers the entire health plan claims and will reimburse if claims exceed 125% of expected claims.  The City had a budget amount of $409,176, which was claims exceed 125% of expected claims.  The City had a budget amount of $409,176, which was partially based on the health plan claims running approximately 9% lower than the prior fiscal year.  On partially based on the health plan claims running approximately 9% lower than the prior fiscal year.  On October 08, 2015, a Request for Proposal for Stop Loss Reinsurance was sent to directly to 13 Stop October 08, 2015, a Request for Proposal for Stop Loss Reinsurance was sent to directly to 13 Stop Loss carriers with an additional 11 carriers notified through the CityLoss carriers with an additional 11 carriers notified through the City’’s practice of posting RFPs practice of posting RFP’’s on s on Public Purchase.  Public Purchase.   Of the carriers that were solicited, the City received 8 vendor proposals.  All vendors provided stop loss Of the carriers that were solicited, the City received 8 vendor proposals.  All vendors provided stop loss proposals matching the current contract with Voya Financial.  Rates provided by the vendors on fixed proposals matching the current contract with Voya Financial.  Rates provided by the vendors on fixed proposals matching the current contract with Voya Financial.  Rates provided by the vendors on fixed proposals matching the current contract with Voya Financial.  Rates provided by the vendors on fixed premiums (specific and aggregate rates paid by the City) range from a .01% decrease in premium with premiums (specific and aggregate rates paid by the City) range from a .01% decrease in premium with QBE to a 44.99% increase in premium with Aetna.  Voya Financial provided a firm renewal offering with QBE to a 44.99% increase in premium with Aetna.  Voya Financial provided a firm renewal offering with fixed rates at a minimal .02% increase in the annual premium.  Voyafixed rates at a minimal .02% increase in the annual premium.  Voya’’s renewal offer also includes a s renewal offer also includes a slight increase in the aggregate factor at 2.93%.  The aggregate factor is used to base the Cityslight increase in the aggregate factor at 2.93%.  The aggregate factor is used to base the City’’s s maximum claims liability for the aggregate stop loss policy.   maximum claims liability for the aggregate stop loss policy.    Currently, the CityCurrently, the City’’s Stop Loss coverage takes effect when an individual employees Stop Loss coverage takes effect when an individual employee’’s annual claims s annual claims reach $165,000. The Cityreach $165,000. The City’’s benefits consultant has reviewed the specific deductible levels and finds that s benefits consultant has reviewed the specific deductible levels and finds that there is no need to increase the specific deductible in the upcoming plan year.  Keeping in mind the there is no need to increase the specific deductible in the upcoming plan year.  Keeping in mind the City’s budget for the upcoming fiscal year, the Citys budget for the upcoming fiscal year, the City’’s consultant does not recommend lowering the s consultant does not recommend lowering the current specific deductible.  It is the recommendation of the Citycurrent specific deductible.  It is the recommendation of the City’’s consultant to stay at the current s consultant to stay at the current $165,000 Specific level and renew with Voya Financial.  The .02% increase is below the budgeted fiscal $165,000 Specific level and renew with Voya Financial.  The .02% increase is below the budgeted fiscal year dollar amount for the Cityyear dollar amount for the City’’s stop loss policy.  Keeping the current vendor in place also provides for s stop loss policy.  Keeping the current vendor in place also provides for coverage consistency and ease of administration for the City.  The Citycoverage consistency and ease of administration for the City.  The City’’s consultant will seek best and s consultant will seek best and final offers and proceed with the best proposal.final offers and proceed with the best proposal.     Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action to renew the CityConsider approval or other action to renew the City’’s Stop Loss Coverage with Voya at an annual s Stop Loss Coverage with Voya at an annual premium not to exceed $409,176.00.premium not to exceed $409,176.00. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate 49.0099.76 Proposed Plan $7,152,672.48 $ $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $596,056.04 $385,842.72$268,898.52$405,220.68 Munich Re $19,377.96$33,768.39 $32,153.56$1,000,000 $1,614.83$1,524.44 Unlimited $2,553.12 $165,000 Aetna$82.23 24/12$4.13 24/12 3.91%0.63% 125% N/AN/AN/A 46.86105.95 Proposed Plan ($353,354.52) $6,530,419.44 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $544,201.62 $401,391.60$422,599.44 $ $21,207.84$35,216.62 $33,449.30$1,000,000$19,931.88 $1,767.32$1,391.82 Unlimited Symetra$165,000 Aetna$85.55 -5.13% 24/12$4.52 24/12 4.95% 125% N/AN/AN/A 57.21147.04 Proposed Plan ($418,338.72) $6,465,435.24 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $538,786.27 $544,387.08$583,846.80$181,179.24 $ $39,459.72$48,653.90 $45,365.59$1,000,000 $3,288.31$1,377.97 Unlimited $170,000 $116.02 Aetna44.99% Stop Loss Renewal Analysis Aetna $8.41-6.08% PAID PAID125% N/AN/AN/A Effective Date: 1/1/2016 City of La Porte 38.62104.25 Renewal - Option 1 Voya Financial $7,085,248.44 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $590,437.37$201,474.48 $382,820.40$402,761.40 $ $19,941.00$33,563.45 $31,901.70$1,000,000 $1,661.75$1,510.07 Unlimited $165,000 Aetna$81.59$93.84 24/12$4.25 24/12 2.93%0.02% 125% N/AN/AN/A 38.62104.25 Voya Financial $6,883,773.96 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $573,647.83 $382,820.40$402,667.56 $ $19,847.16$33,555.63 $31,901.70$1,000,000 $1,653.93$1,467.13 Unlimited Current $165,000 Aetna $81.59 24/12$4.23 24/12 125% n/an/an/an/a N/AN/AN/A Firm Rates: VOYA Financial (until 11/2) & Symetra (until 10/30) 135256391 Additional claims information may be requested. Lifetime Maximum Reimbursement Aggregate Monthly Premium % Monthly Attachment Factor Maximum Reimbursement Aggregate Annual Premium Annual Attachment Factor Total Monthly Premium AGGREGATE RETENTION Specific Monthly Premium Total Annual Premium Specific Annual Premium Percent Difference Annual Difference Monthly Accomodation SPECIFIC RETENTION TOTAL FIXED COSTS Aggregating Specific Family Single Aggregate Factors Stop Loss Carrier Annual Difference Composite Aggregate Rate Specific Rates TPA / Network Run-In Limit Page: 1 CoveragesCoverages CompositeComposite Corridor ContractContract 38.26104.43 Proposed Plan $6,955,608.48 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $579,634.04 $382,790.16$402,637.32 $ $19,847.16$33,553.11 $31,899.18$1,000,000$71,834.52 $1,653.93$1,482.44 Unlimited ($30.24) $165,000 Aetna$81.58 -0.01% 24/12$4.23 24/12 1.04% QBE125% N/AN/AN/A 38.91116.17 Proposed Plan ($269,086.20) $6,614,687.76 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $551,223.98 $419,908.44$441,679.32 $ $21,770.88$36,806.61 $34,992.37$1,000,000$39,011.76 $1,814.24$1,409.78 Unlimited $165,000 Aetna$89.49 -3.91% 24/12$4.64 24/12 9.69% 125% N/AN/AN/A AIG 51.63130.77 Proposed Plan $7,033,917.96 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $586,159.83 $485,366.04$150,144.00$511,828.92$109,161.36 $ $26,462.88$42,652.41 $40,447.17$1,000,000 $2,205.24$1,499.13 Unlimited $165,000 *NNL + 50% Rate Cap SunLife $103.45 Aetna27.11% Stop Loss Renewal Analysis 24/12$5.64 24/12 2.18% 125% N/AN/AN/A Effective Date: 1/1/2016 City of La Porte 48.66123.06 Proposed Plan $7,033,917.96 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $586,159.83 $456,869.52$150,144.00$483,332.40 $ $26,462.88$40,277.70 $38,072.46$1,000,000$80,664.84 $2,205.24$1,499.13 Unlimited $165,000 SunLife Aetna$97.3720.03% 24/12$5.64 24/12 2.18% 125% N/AN/AN/A 44.94111.59 Proposed Plan $6,959,221.32 $ Medical + RxMedical + Rx $579,935.11 $415,607.28$435,032.16 $ $19,424.88$36,252.68 $34,633.94$1,000,000$75,447.36$32,364.60 $1,618.74$1,483.21 Unlimited $165,000 Aetna $88.58 24/12$4.14 24/12 1.10%8.04% 125% N/AN/AN/A HM 135256391 Firm Rates: VOYA Financial (until 11/2) & Symetra (until 10/30)Additional claims information may be requested. Lifetime Maximum Reimbursement Aggregate Monthly Premium % Monthly Attachment Factor Maximum Reimbursement Aggregate Annual Premium Annual Attachment Factor Total Monthly Premium AGGREGATE RETENTION Specific Monthly Premium Total Annual Premium Specific Annual Premium Percent Difference Annual Difference Monthly Accomodation SPECIFIC RETENTION TOTAL FIXED COSTS Aggregating Specific Family Single Aggregate Factors Stop Loss Carrier Annual Difference Composite Aggregate Rate Specific Rates TPA / Network Run-In Limit Page: 2 CoveragesCoverages CompositeComposite Corridor ContractContract January 1, 2015-September 30, 2015January 1, 2014-December 31, 2014January 1, 2013-December 31, 2013 5,6835,68374,31832,7291,419108,465 Over Specific Over Specific Over Specific ($165,000)($165,000)($165,000) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ 98,966.4895,716.4575,151.68544,820239,318197,729166,419128,635118,940106,5621,375,333164,740139,875121,800426,415 170,683.33104,301.8688,29986,13183,56181,18278,558 AmountAmountAmount $ $ $ $ $ $ TotalTotalTotal Infection and inflammation due to vascular device or implant High Dollar Claimant Report - 2015 Intense pain in lower limb (reflex sympathetic dystrophy) Precription drug for late-stage kidney disease (Votrient) City of La Porte Claimants > $72,500Claimants > $72,500Claimants > $72,500 DiagnosisDiagnosisDiagnosis Mechanical loosening of prosthetic joint Degenerative joint disease in lower leg 2 Aneurysm in blood vessel in chest Open fracture of tibia (lower leg) Degenerative disc in lower back Malnutrition related to diabetes Bone infection in ankle or foot Septicemia (blood poisoning)Septicemia (blood poisoning) Paralysis of one side of body Skin infection of foot Respiratory failure Kidney stone(s) Premature birth Heart attack Heart failure RelationshipRelationshipRelationship EmployeeEmployeeEmployeeEmployeeEmployeeEmployeeEmployeeEmployeeEmployee SpouseSpouseSpouseSpouseSpouseSpouseSpouseSpouse Note: Claimant 1 not eligible for reimbursement. ChildChild HRA 1000HRA 1000HRA 1000HRA 1000HRA 1000HRA 1000HRA 1000HRA 1000 PlanPlanPlan PPOPPOPPOPPOPPOPPOPPOPPOPPOPPOPPO Ret <65Ret <65Ret <65Ret <65Ret <65 ActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActive ClassClassClass 1011 12345123456789123 10/27/2015 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Appropriation Agenda Date Requested November 9, 2015 Source of Funds:N/A Requested By: Patrice Fogarty Account Number:N/A Department:City Secretary Amount Budgeted:N/A Report:Resolution: Ordinance: Amount Requested: N/A Exhibit: Budgeted Item:YESNO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The La Porte City Council is authorized to make appointments to boards, commissions and committees. All vacant Board positions have been filled except for Member No. 2 on the La Porte Area Water Authority. La Porte Area Water Authority Regarding the ,there is a vacancy because Dennis Steger declined reappointment. This is not a Council District-specific appointment. This appointment will be for a two-year term expiring August 31, 2017, or until successors have been appointed and qualified. A current council member cannot serve on this Board. This Board typically meets only a couple of times a year. Action Required by Council: Consider making an appointment to the Board of the La Porte Area Water Authority. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Amount Budgeted Agenda Date Requested: November 9, 2015 Source of Funds: N/A Requested By: Michael Dolby, Director of Finance Account Number: Department: Finance Amount Budgeted: Report: X Resolution: Ordinance: Amount Requested: Budgeted Item: Exhibits: Spreadsheet of Revenue Lost Staff was asked to evaluate the potential impact on revenue that may result from enacting an over 65 property tax freeze. A property tax freeze is allowed in accordance with the property tax code for over 65 property owners and disabled property owners. The City would automatically freeze the property tax dollar amounts during the year the freeze is enacted. The Cthe City will lose the incremental amount of taxes resulting from the growth in the tax base. Attached is an example of the city losing $37,738 from a tax freeze during a 3.76% growth in our tax base. The exact amount of revenue lost cannot be determined since the revenue collected from property taxes is dependent on current market conditions. Therefore, the Crevenue loss could be much greater in years when there is a significant growth in the C tax base. However, Lahistorical property tax growth hasaveraged approximately 3.76 to 4.36 percent for the last 5 years.Once the freeze is enacted, it cannot be revoked. Currently, the City of La Porte provides a homestead exemption of 20% as allowed by state law. The City allow has a local option $60,000 exemption for those over 65 and disabled. The average home value in La Porte is $125,000 according to the Harris County Appraisal District. This means that La Porte homesteads for the elderly or disabled, on average, have a taxable value of $40,000 or tax payment of $284. Should Council wish to extend additional relief to the elderly and disabled, staff would recommend increasing the local option exemption from $60,000 to $63,000. This would provide a similar benefit to the elderly and disabled community, while maintaining some local control. The exemption would also generate an immediate benefit to the elderly and disabled. City Council has complete control over the local option exemption to raise, lower, or even remove. These options are not available with the tax freeze. Action Required by Council: Consideration and possible action regarding additional tax relief for elderly and disabled. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby Alexander, City Manager Date Council Agenda Item November 9, 2015 9. (a) Receive report of the La Porte Development Corporation Board – Councilmember Engelken *********************************************************************************** Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item November 9, 2015 November 9, 2015 10.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTSADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, Thursday, November 19, 2015Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, Thursday, November 19, 2015 • Thanksgiving Holidays, Thursday, November 26, 2015 and Friday, November 27, 2015Thanksgiving Holidays, Thursday, November 26, 2015 and Friday, November 27, 2015 • City Council Meeting, Monday, December 14, 2015City Council Meeting, Monday, December 14, 2015 • Christmas Holidays, Thursday, December 24, 2015 and Friday, December 25, 2015Christmas Holidays, Thursday, December 24, 2015 and Friday, December 25, 2015 • regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community 11.COUNCIL COMMENTSCOUNCIL COMMENTS members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information or existing policies or existing policies ––Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, J. Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, J. Martin, K. Martin and Mayor RigbyMartin, K. Martin and Mayor Rigby   12.EXECUTIVE SESSIONEXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government Code, in accordance with the authority contained in:Code, in accordance with the authority contained in: ––Consultations with Attorney regarding pending Consultations with Attorney regarding pending Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(a)Texas Government Code, Section 551.071(1)(a) or contemplated Litigation or contemplated Litigation ––Meet with City Attorney and City Manager to discuss City of La Porte Meet with City Attorney and City Manager to discuss City of La Porte Adoption Center and Animal Shelter Project construction contract matter.Adoption Center and Animal Shelter Project construction contract matter. ––Personnel Matter: Deliberations concerning the Personnel Matter: Deliberations concerning the Texas Government Code, Section 551.074Texas Government Code, Section 551.074 appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee, unless the officer or employee requests a public hearing: Judge Denise Mitrano.or employee, unless the officer or employee requests a public hearing: Judge Denise Mitrano. into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive into regular session and consider action, if any, on item(s) discussed in executive 13.RECONVENERECONVENE session. session. 14.ADJOURNADJOURN ****************************************************************** ******************************************************************