Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-16 Regular Meeting of the La Porte City Council LOUIS R. RIGBYCHUCK ENGELKENCHUCK ENGELKEN MayorCouncilmember District 2Councilmember District 2 JOHN ZEMANEKDARYL LEONARD Councilmember At Large ACouncilmember At Large ACouncilmember District 3Councilmember District 3 DOTTIE KAMINSKIDOTTIE KAMINSKIKRISTIN MARTIN Councilmember At Large BCouncilmember At Large BCouncilmember District 4Councilmember District 4 DANNY EARPJAY MARTIN Mayor Pro-TemCouncilmember District 5Councilmember District 5 Councilmember District 1Councilmember District 1 MIKE CLAUSEN Councilmember District 6Councilmember District 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDACITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Notice is hereby given of a Regular Meeting of the La Porte City Council to be held December 12, Notice is hereby given of a Regular Meeting of the La Porte City Council to be held December 12, 2016, beginning at 6:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers, 604 W. Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, 2016, beginning at 6:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers, 604 W. Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas, for the purpose of considering the following agenda items. All agenda items are subject to Texas, for the purpose of considering the following agenda items. All agenda items are subject to action. 1.CALL TO ORDERCALL TO ORDER 2.INVOCATIONINVOCATION––The invocation will be given by Clark Askins, Assistant City Attorney.The invocation will be given by Clark Askins, Assistant City Attorney.   3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE––The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie Kaminski Kaminski   4.PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONSPRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONS (a)Recognition Recognition -- Employees of the Third Quarter (2016) Employees of the Third Quarter (2016) -- Rachel Gomez and Trudy Rayburn Rachel Gomez and Trudy Rayburn - City of La Porte Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department City of La Porte Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department -- Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby 5.PUBLIC COMMENTSPUBLIC COMMENTS (Limited to five minutes per person.) (Limited to five minutes per person.) 6.CONSENT AGENDACONSENT AGENDA(All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by (All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be removed and considered separately.)removed and considered separately.) (a)Consider approval or other action regarding minutes of the meeting held on November 14, Consider approval or other action regarding minutes of the meeting held on November 14, 2016 2016 -- P. Fogarty P. Fogarty (b)Consider approval or other action awarding Request For Proposal #17502 for Delinquent Ad Consider approval or other action awarding Request For Proposal #17502 for Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Collection Services Valorem Tax Collection Services -- M. Dolby M. Dolby (c)Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution authorizing publication of a notice of Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution authorizing publication of a notice of intention to issue certificates of obligation intention to issue certificates of obligation -- M. Dolby M. Dolby (d)Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to the Local Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to the Local Government Code Chapter 380 Agreement between the City of La Porte and Ybarra Government Code Chapter 380 Agreement between the City of La Porte and Ybarra Restaurants, Inc., for waiver of payment for closure of street rightRestaurants, Inc., for waiver of payment for closure of street right--ofof--way in connection with way in connection with the construction of a new El Toro restaurant the construction of a new El Toro restaurant -- T. Leach T. Leach (e)Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 70 Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 70 “Traffic and VehiclesVehicles””of the Code of Ordinances by amending truck route regulations to add site plan of the Code of Ordinances by amending truck route regulations to add site plan requirements for establishments offering fuel to commercial vehicles requirements for establishments offering fuel to commercial vehicles -- C. Alexander C. Alexander (f)Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Morgan's Point to provide an emergency water main interconnect with the City of Morgan's Point to provide an emergency water main interconnect -- D. Pennell (g)Consider approval or other action awarding Bid# 17005 for plastic garbage bags Consider approval or other action awarding Bid# 17005 for plastic garbage bags -- D. Pennell (h)Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance vacating, abandoning, and closing a Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance vacating, abandoning, and closing a portion of N. 25th Street and West Polk Street rightsportion of N. 25th Street and West Polk Street rights--ofof--way way -- B. Sterling B. Sterling (i)Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance abandoning and releasing an Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance abandoning and releasing an existing 16existing 16--footfoot--wide public utility easement located within the abandoned east/west alley of wide public utility easement located within the abandoned east/west alley of Block 48, Town of La Porte, Harris County, Texas Block 48, Town of La Porte, Harris County, Texas -- B. Sterling B. Sterling (j)Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution reaffirming the City's Investment Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution reaffirming the City's Investment Policy Policy -- S. Wolny S. Wolny 7.PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ASSOCIATED ORDINANCESPUBLIC HEARINGS AND ASSOCIATED ORDINANCES (a)Continue public hearing to receive comments on the Dangerous Building Board Continue public hearing to receive comments on the Dangerous Building Board recommendation of condemnation of dangerous/substandard buildings located at 0 S. Lobit recommendation of condemnation of dangerous/substandard buildings located at 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer; consider approval or other action regarding ordinances for condemnation of and 3313 Bayer; consider approval or other action regarding ordinances for condemnation of dangerous/substandard buildings located at 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer dangerous/substandard buildings located at 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer -- M. Huber M. Huber 8.AUTHORIZATIONSAUTHORIZATIONS (a)Consider approval or other action Bid# 16018 for City of La Porte Depot Expansion Consider approval or other action Bid# 16018 for City of La Porte Depot Expansion - C. AlexanderAlexander 9.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTIONDISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION (a)Discussion and possible action regarding the City of La Porte's participation in branch early Discussion and possible action regarding the City of La Porte's participation in branch early voting with La Porte Independent School District during the May 2017 general election voting with La Porte Independent School District during the May 2017 general election - P. FogartyFogarty 10.REPORTSREPORTS (a)Receive report of La Porte Development Corporation Board Receive report of La Porte Development Corporation Board -- Councilmember Engelken Councilmember Engelken (b)Receive report on the Gilley's development project Receive report on the Gilley's development project -- T. Leach/ D. Miles T. Leach/ D. Miles (c)Receive report for ONE Solution Receive report for ONE Solution -- M. Dolby M. Dolby 11.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTSADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS •Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Tuesday, December 13, 2016 Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Tuesday, December 13, 2016  •Christmas Holidays, Friday, December 23, 2016 and Monday, December 26, 2016Christmas Holidays, Friday, December 23, 2016 and Monday, December 26, 2016 •New Year Holiday, Monday, January 2, 2017New Year Holiday, Monday, January 2, 2017 •City Council Meeting, Monday, January 9, 2017City Council Meeting, Monday, January 9, 2017 •City Council Meeting, Monday, January 23, 2017City Council Meeting, Monday, January 23, 2017 12.COUNCIL COMMENTSCOUNCIL COMMENTS regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of communitymembers, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual communitymembers, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information or existing policies information or existing policies -- Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, J. Martin, K. Martin and Mayor RigbyClausen, J. Martin, K. Martin and Mayor Rigby   13.ADJOURNADJOURN The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need arise and if The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any agenda item should the need arise and if applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government Code (the Texas open applicable pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government Code (the Texas open meetings laws).meetings laws). In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees, requests should be received accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees, requests should be received 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019.24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019. CERTIFICATIONCERTIFICATION I certify that a copy of the December 12, 2016, agenda of items to be considered by the City Council was posted on the I certify that a copy of the December 12, 2016, agenda of items to be considered by the City Council was posted on the City Hall bulletin board on December 6, 2016. City Hall bulletin board on December 6, 2016. Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item December 12, 2016 December 12, 2016 1.CALL TO ORDERCALL TO ORDER 2.INVOCATIONINVOCATION––The invocation will be given by Clark Askins, Assistant City Attorney.The invocation will be given by Clark Askins, Assistant City Attorney.   3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE––The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie The Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Councilmember Dottie Kaminski Kaminski   4.PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONSPRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, and RECOGNITIONS (a)Recognition Recognition -- Employees of the Third Quarter (2016) Employees of the Third Quarter (2016) -- Rachel Gomez and Trudy Rayburn Rachel Gomez and Trudy Rayburn - City of La Porte Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department City of La Porte Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department -- Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby 5.PUBLIC COMMENTSPUBLIC COMMENTS (Limited to five minutes per person.) (Limited to five minutes per person.) ****************************************************************** ****************************************************************** Ʃķ 9ƒƦƌƚǤĻĻƭ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ Ќ vǒğƩƷĻƩ ЋЉЊЏ wğĭŷĻƌ DƚƒĻǩ ğƓķ ƩǒķǤ wğǤĬǒƩƓ Ώ 9a{ wğĭŷĻƌ DƚƒĻǩ ğƓķ ƩǒķǤ wğǤĬǒƩƓ ĬƚƷŷ ĭǒƩƩĻƓƷƌǤ ƭĻƩǝĻ ƷŷĻ \[ğ tƚƩƷĻ ĭƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ ğƭ \[źĻǒƷĻƓğƓƷƭ źƓ ƷŷĻ 9ƒĻƩŭĻƓĭǤ aĻķźĭğƌ {ĻƩǝźĭĻƭ ķźǝźƭźƚƓ͵ wğĭŷĻƌ ƆƚźƓĻķ ƷŷĻ \[ğ tƚƩƷĻ ƷĻğƒ źƓ WğƓǒğƩǤ ƚŅ ЋЉЉЉ ğƓķ ƩǒķǤ źƓ ağƩĭŷ ƚŅ ЋЉЉВ͵ .ƚƷŷ ĻƒƦƌƚǤĻĻƭ ƦĻƩŅƚƩƒ ƷŷĻźƩ ķğźƌǤ ƆƚĬƭ ǞźƷŷ ŷźŭŷ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ ƚŅ ƦƩƚŅĻƭƭźƚƓğƌźƭƒ ğƓķ ķĻķźĭğƷźƚƓ͵ ŷĻǤ ƌĻğķ ƷŷĻźƩ ƩĻƭƦĻĭƷźǝĻ ƭŷźŅƷƭ ĬǤ ĻǣğƒƦƌĻ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻźƩ ƦƚƭźƷźǝĻ ğƷƷźƷǒķĻƭ ğƓķ ƷŷĻźƩ ĭğƩĻ ŅƚƩ ƦğƷźĻƓƷƭ͵ ŷĻǤ ĭƚƓƷźƓǒğƌƌǤ ƭĻĻƉ ĬĻƷƷĻƩ ǞğǤƭ Ʒƚ ƭĻƩǝĻ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ ğƓķ ƩĻƦƩĻƭĻƓƷ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ǞĻƌƌ͵ LƓ ƷŷĻ ƒƚƓƷŷ ƚŅ WǒƌǤͲ ƷŷĻƭĻ ƷǞƚ ĻƒƦƌƚǤĻĻƭ ƷĻğƒĻķ ǒƦ ŅƚƩ ğ Ɖźķ ŅƩźĻƓķƌǤ Ņƚƚķ ķƩźǝĻ ĬĻƓĻŅźƷƷźƓŭ ŷĻ .ƩźķŭĻ hǝĻƩ ƩƚǒĬƌĻķ ‘ğƷĻƩƭͲ ğƓ ğŭĻƓĭǤ ķĻķźĭğƷĻķ Ʒƚ ƚŅŅĻƩźƓŭ ƭǒƦƦƚƩƷ ŅƚƩ ǝźĭƷźƒƭ ƚŅ ķƚƒĻƭƷźĭ ǝźƚƌĻƓĭĻ͵ ŷĻǤ ŷğķ ĬƩƚĭŷǒƩĻƭ ƦƩźƓƷĻķͲ ƦƌğĭĻķ Ņƚƚķ ķƩƚƦ ĬƚǣĻƭ źƓ ƭĻǝĻƩğƌ ĭźƷǤ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭƭͲ ğƓķ ķźķ ğ Ņƚƚķ ķƩźǝĻ ğƷ YƩƚŭĻƩ ǞŷĻƩĻ ƷŷĻǤ ŅźƌƌĻķ ƷŷĻ ĬğĭƉ ƚŅ ğƓ ğƒĬǒƌğƓĭĻ ǞźƷŷ ķƚƓğƷźƚƓƭ͵ LƓ ƷƚƷğƌͲ ƷŷĻźƩ ĻŅŅƚƩƷƭ ĭƚƌƌĻĭƷĻķ ƚǝĻƩ ЊͲАЉЉ ƦƚǒƓķƭ ƚŅ Ņƚƚķ͵ ŷĻ .ƩźķŭĻ Ǟğƭ ǝĻƩǤ ŭƩğƷĻŅǒƌ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ƭǒƦƦƚƩƷ ƩĻĭĻźǝĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤͲ ğƓķ ƭƦĻĭźŅźĭğƌƌǤ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓ ğƓķ ƌĻğķĻƩƭŷźƦ ŭźǝĻƓ ĬǤ wğĭŷĻƌ ğƓķ ƩǒķǤ͵ CƚƩ ƷŷĻźƩ ƚƓŭƚźƓŭ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻͲ ƷŷĻźƩ ŷźŭŷ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ ƚŅ ƦĻƩŅƚƩƒğƓĭĻͲ ğƓķ ƷŷĻźƩ źƓźƷźğƷźǝĻ Ʒƚ ŭƚ ğĬƚǝĻ ğƓķ ĬĻǤƚƓķ Ʒƚ ƦƩƚǝźķĻ ƭǒƦƦƚƩƷ ƷŷƩƚǒŭŷ Ʒŷźƭ Ņƚƚķ ķƩźǝĻͲ ƦƌĻğƭĻ ƆƚźƓ ƒĻ źƓ ƩĻĭƚŭƓźǩźƓŭ wğĭŷĻƌ DƚƒĻǩ ğƓķ ƩǒķǤ wğǤĬǒƩƓ ğƭ ƷŷĻ 9ƒƦƌƚǤĻĻƭ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ vǒğƩƷĻƩ͵ Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item December 12, 2016 December 12, 2016 6.CONSENT AGENDACONSENT AGENDA(All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by (All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be removed and considered separately.)removed and considered separately.) (a)Consider approval or other action regarding minutes of the meeting held on November 14, Consider approval or other action regarding minutes of the meeting held on November 14, 2016 2016 -- P. Fogarty P. Fogarty (b)Consider approval or other action awarding Request For Proposal #17502 for Delinquent Ad Consider approval or other action awarding Request For Proposal #17502 for Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Collection Services Valorem Tax Collection Services -- M. Dolby M. Dolby (c)Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution authorizing publication of a notice of Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution authorizing publication of a notice of intention to issue certificates of obligation intention to issue certificates of obligation -- M. Dolby M. Dolby (d)(d)Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to the Local Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to the Local Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to the Local Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to the Local Government Code Chapter 380 Agreement between the City of La Porte and Ybarra Government Code Chapter 380 Agreement between the City of La Porte and Ybarra Restaurants, Inc., for waiver of payment for closure of street rightRestaurants, Inc., for waiver of payment for closure of street right--ofof--way in connection with way in connection with the construction of a new El Toro restaurant the construction of a new El Toro restaurant -- T. Leach T. Leach (e)Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 70 Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 70 “Traffic and VehiclesVehicles””of the Code of Ordinances by amending truck route regulations to add site plan of the Code of Ordinances by amending truck route regulations to add site plan requirements for establishments offering fuel to commercial vehicles requirements for establishments offering fuel to commercial vehicles -- C. Alexander C. Alexander (f)Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Morgan's Point to provide an emergency water main interconnect with the City of Morgan's Point to provide an emergency water main interconnect -- D. Pennell (g)Consider approval or other action awarding Bid# 17005 for plastic garbage bags Consider approval or other action awarding Bid# 17005 for plastic garbage bags -- D. Pennell (h)Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance vacating, abandoning, and closing Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance vacating, abandoning, and closing a portion of N. 25th Street and West Polk Street rightsa portion of N. 25th Street and West Polk Street rights--ofof--way way -- B. Sterling B. Sterling (i)Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance abandoning and releasing an Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance abandoning and releasing an existing 16existing 16--footfoot--wide public utility easement located within the abandoned east/west alley of wide public utility easement located within the abandoned east/west alley of Block 48, Town of La Porte, Harris County, Texas Block 48, Town of La Porte, Harris County, Texas -- B. Sterling B. Sterling (j)Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution reaffirming the City's Investment Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution reaffirming the City's Investment Policy Policy -- S. Wolny S. Wolny ****************************************************************** ****************************************************************** LOUIS RIGBY CHUCK ENGELKEN Mayor Councilmember District 2 JOHN ZEMANEK DARYL LEONARD Councilmember At Large A Councilmember District 3 DOTTIE KAMINSKI KRISTIN MARTIN Councilmember At Large B Councilmember District 4 DANNY EARP JAY MARTIN Mayor Pro-Tem Councilmember District 5 Councilmember District 1 MIKE CLAUSEN Councilmember District 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE NOVEMBER 14, 2016 The City Council of the City of La Porte met in a regular meeting on Monday, November 14, 2016, at the City Hall Council Chambers, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas, at 6:00 p.m. to consider the following items of business: 1. Mayor Rigby called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Members of Council present: Councilmembers Engelken, J. Martin, K. Martin, Leonard, Earp, Zemanek, Clausen, and Kaminski. Also present were City Secretary Patrice Fogarty, City Manager Corby Alexander, and Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins. 2. INVOCATION – The invocation was given by Dee Spears, Fairmont Park Church. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Kristin Martin. 4. PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS and RECOGNITIONS (a) Recognition – 2016 City University Participants – Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby recognized the 2016 City University Participants. (b)Proclamation – Tony Constanzo Day – Mayor Rigby Mayor Rigby presented Tony Constanzo with a proclamation for Tony Constanzo Day. (c) Recognition – Employees of the Third Quarter (2016) – Rachel Gomez and Trudy Rayburn – City of La Porte Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department – Mayor Rigby Recognition of Employees of the Third Quarter 2016 were rescheduled to the December 12, 2016, Council meeting. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Limited to five minutes per person.) There were no public comments. 6. CONSENT AGENDA (All consent agenda items are considered routine by City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember requests an item be removed and considered separately.) (a)Consider approval or other action regarding minutes of meeting held on October 24, 2016 – P. Fogarty Page1 of 5 Nov. 14, 2016, Council Meeting Minutes (b)Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution appointing one representative and one alternate to the H-GAC 2017 General Assembly and Board of Directors – P. Fogarty (c)Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Harris County to construct sidewalk, drainage and traffic control improvements along Park Drive from S. Blackwell to Fairmont Parkway – S. Valiante (d)Considerapproval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Harris County to construct a sidewalk along Park Drive from S. Lobit to San Jacinto Street – S. Valiante (e)Consider approval or other action awarding bid for vehicle and equipment replacements for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 – S. Valiante (f)Consider approval or other action regarding the purchase of playground equipment in the amount of $52, 949.52 from GameTime, for Lomax Park and Tom Brown Park – R. Epting (g)Consider approval or other action authorizing the purchase of medical treatment devices in the amount of $57,603.33 from Physio-Control, Inc. – R. Nolen (h)Consider approval or other action regarding the purchase of computers through PCMG (PCMall Gov) utilizing Buy Board Contract 498-15) – R. Valdez (i)Consider approval or other action regarding to roll over requested encumbrances from La Porte Fiscal Year 2016 Budget to La Porte Fiscal 2017 Budget – M. Dolby (j)Consider approval or other action accepting the Fiscal Year 2016 audit/asset forfeiture report and associated financial records as required by Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure – K. Adcox Councilmember J. Martin made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda items pursuant to staff recommendations. Councilmember Kaminski seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 9/0. 7. AUTHORIZATIONS (a)Consider approval or other action regarding recommendation of City Staff and the Chapter 172 Employee Retiree Insurance and Benefits Committee for award of bid proposal to vendors for Medical; Pharmacy; Stop Loss; Medical and Vision benefits plans – M. Hartleib Human Resources Manager Matt Hartleib introduced John Heerwagen, who presented a summary. These are the following staff recommendations: Third Party Administration of Medical and Pharmacy Plans – Recommended is the proposal received from the City’s current provider, Aetna, which reduces administrative costs and increases the share of Rx rebates the City retains; Stop Loss – Recommended is the proposal received from Partner RE which would result in a projected savings over the current plan with Highmark. Medicare – Recommended is the proposal received from Aetna, which is the current provider. This recommendation will result in no change to our retirees’ coverage and no increase to City cost. Vision – The City’s current provider for the voluntary vision plan did not submit a proposal. Recommended is the proposal from Avesis, which includes benefits that closely match the current plan and a slight reduction in cost to participants. Page2 of 5 Nov. 14, 2016, Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Zemanek made a motion to approve the recommendation of City Staff and the Chapter 172 Employee Retiree Insurance and Benefits Committee for award of bid proposal to vendors for Medical; Pharmacy; Stop Loss; Medical and Vision benefits plans. Councilmember K. Martin seconded the motion.MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 9/0. (b)Consider approval or other action regarding vendor service contract for mowing of City-maintained properties – R. Epting Parks and Recreation Director Rosalyn Epting presented a summary. Mayor Rigby asked if Camp Landscape Services were the only bidder, would the City have to go out for bid a second time. Finance Director Dolby and Purchasing Manager Cherell Daeumer both responded, probably not. Mayor Rigby asked Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins if there is a fourth option. Mr. Askins responded the City should choose from the bids that were submitted. Councilmember Earp made a motion to reject the first bids and accept the bid of $286,280 from Cornerstone Maintenance. Councilmember Leonard seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 8/1. Ayes: Councilmembers Earp, Zemanek, Kaminski, Leonard, Clausen, J. Martin, K. Martin and Engelken Nays: Mayor Rigby Absent: None 8. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION th (a)Discussion and possible action regarding design of the elevated storage tank artwork on 4 Street and Main Street – S. Valiante Public Works Director Sharon Valiante presented a summary. Councilmember Zemanek commented he likes La Porte in the middle of the tank, the La Porte logo on the left and the Bulldog artwork on the right. Councilmember Clausen made a motion for the Bulldog logo at 0º and 180º and the word “La Porte” at 90º and 270º. Councilmember Zemanek seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 9/0. (b)Discussion and possible action regarding City of La Porte Parks and Recreation Department Operational Analysis – R. Epting Parks and Recreation Director Rosalyn Epting presented a summary and introduced Melissa Chew, Project Consultant with GreenPlay LLC. After the presentation, Councilmember Leonard asked if Staff and the Parks and Recreation Department were made aware of alternative funding opportunities that other cities have used. Ms. Chew responded yes, they were provided with a list of over 100 funding strategies. Councilman Zemanek stated the entire report is all of the negatives and none of the positives, and he indicated concern for the cost of making changes to comply with the proposed organization chart. Councilmember Earp asked if the Master Plan was reviewed and re-evaluated. Ms. Chew responded yes. He also asked if the comparison to other cities was apples to apples or if it is slightly skewed. Ms. Epting responded that there are definitely subtle differences between what each city does, which means the information is skewed somewhat. She will be looking at this very closely. Page3 of 5 Nov. 14, 2016, Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Engelken stated he is disappointed in the entire study and overall product, including performance metrics indicating some strengths don’t coincide with indicated weaknesses. He said the study indicates staff doesn’t know what the metrics are, so what are they being evaluated on? He said the study indicates the City does not advertise and toot our horn; however, the website and newsletters indicate all events. Mayor Rigby asked if two new positions were being recommended on the organizational chart. Ms. Chew responded there are no additional full-time positions being recommended. Mayor Rigby asked if the Manager position is considered higher than the Superintendent position. Ms. Chew responded yes. Mayor Rigby commented Staff should not do anything with the organization until Human Resources Manager Matt Hartleib has completed the compensation study. Mayor Rigby asked if the plan is to take additional comments. City Manager Corby Alexander asked Council to provide additional feedback before the next City Council meeting. Council does not have to reiterate what was said at this meeting, but any additional comments are welcome. (c)Discussion and possible action regarding future operations of the La Porte Boys Baseball Association – C. Alexander Parks and Recreation Director Rosalyn Epting presented a summary. Councilmember Engelken commented he is disappointed in the timeline of meeting the objective set this past summer, and there needs to be more accountability on the accounting side. Councilmember Earp questioned how tournaments are handled. Heath Patterson, President of the La Porte Boys Baseball Association advised the association does not have a Tournament Director; but the association will host their own tournaments, and payments will be accepted by cashier’s checks and credit cards. Councilmember Zemanek commented he has a problem with subletting out the field. Mayor Rigby stated there needs to be an agreement between the City of La Porte and the La Porte Boys Baseball Association. Councilmember Engelken commented there was clear direction that a good and solid agreement was to be done by September 11, 2016; and here we are, two months later without one. Councilmember Zemanek asked Finance Director Michael Dolby if he is confident that the changes have been addressed with the La Porte Boys Baseball Association. Mr. Dolby responded the association is working very well with Staff and are being very forthcoming. Parks and Recreation Director Rosalyn Epting asked Council for direction to review the current agreement with the association; information regarding tournament play; general bookkeeping and registration; concession stand operation; umpires and fields. Councilmember Clausen made a motion for Staff and the La Porte Boys Baseball Association to draft an agreement with items discussed and also those found in the agenda request and come back at a later date for approval. Councilmember Kaminski seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 9/0. 9. REPORTS (a) Receive report of Fiscal Affairs Committee – Councilmember Engelken Councilmember Engelken provided a report of the Fiscal Affairs Committee meeting held prior to the City Council Meeting. Page4 of 5 Nov. 14, 2016, Council Meeting Minutes 10. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS There were no administrative reports. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of community members, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information. Councilmembers K. Martin; Zemanek and Clausen congratulated Tony Constanzo; participants of the 2016 City University and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving; Councilmember Kaminski congratulated Tony Constanzo; participants of the 2016 City University and commented she attended the Harvest Banquet that was well attended; Councilmember Leonard congratulated the participants of the 2016 City University and expressed condolences on the passing of La Porte Independent School District’s retired teacher and coach Jerry Schima; Councilmember Engelken congratulated Tony Constanzo; participants of the 2016 City University; thanked the Parks and Recreation Department for the report; La Porte Boys Baseball Association President Heath Patterson and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving; Councilmember Earp congratulated Tony Constanzo; participants of the 2016 City University; wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving and thanked La Porte Boys Baseball Association President Heath Patterson; Councilmember J. Martin congratulated Tony Constanzo; participants of the 2016 City University; the City for moving forward with the Park Drive sidewalks and Human Resources Manager Matt Hartleib for a great job on the Medical; Pharmacy; Stop Loss; Medical and Vision benefits plans and Mayor Rigby congratulated Tony Constanzo; participants of the 2016 City University; informed he attended the Veterans Day Ceremony at the high school; thanked Councilmember Leonard for serving the country and advised he and Mayors Bechtel; Mouton and Don Carlos attended a meeting in Austin with Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives Joe Straus to speak and address issues in the upcoming legislative session such as revenue caps; annexation and transportation. Lastly, Mayor Rigby wished Public Works Director Sharon Valiante the best in her future endeavors at the City of Fulshear. 12. ADJOURN - There being no further business, Councilmember Engelken made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Councilmember Leonard seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 9/0. _______________________________ Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary Passed and approved on December 12, 2016. ________________________________ Mayor Louis R. Rigby Page5 of 5 Nov. 14, 2016, Council Meeting Minutes REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AAppropriationppropriation Agenda Date Requested:te Requested: 20162016 N/N/AA Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Michael DolbMichael Dolbyy, Director of , Director of AAccount Number:ccount Number: Requested BByy:: Finance Finance AAmount Budmount Budggeted:eted: FinanceFinance Department:t: AAmount Requested:mount Requested: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: BudBudggeted Item:eted Item:YESYESNONO Other: Attachments :ts : 1.RFP Evaluation FormsP Evaluation Forms 2.Performance Recordformance Record 3.RPF MatriF Matrixx SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS At the October 10, 2016, Council Meetinber 10, 2016, Council Meetingg, Council reviewed the evaluation matrix for the Request , Council reviewed the evaluation matrix for the Request for Proposal for delinquent tax collection services. Staff was instructed to proceed with the RFP usinr delinquent tax collection services. Staff was instructed to proceed with the RFP using the evaluation matrix that was presented. matrix that was presented. RFP 17502 for Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Collections Services was advertised in the Bafor Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Collections Services was advertised in the Bayy Area Area Observer on n thhthth October 20 & 27 & 27, posted on Public Purchase and the Cit, posted on Public Purchase and the Cityy’s website. Proposals were received ’s website. Proposals were received from LinebargerGogganBlair&SampsonLLP(Linebarger)andPerdueBrandonFielderCollins&MotLinebarger GoGogganBlair&SampsonLLP(Linebarger)andPerdueBrandonFielderCollins&MottLLPGoggggan Blair & Sampson, LLP an Blair & Sampson, LLP ((LinebarLinebarggerer)) and Perdue Brandon Fielder Collins & Mo and Perdue Brandon Fielder Collins & Mott LLP t (Perdue). The proposals were evaluated usinhe proposals were evaluated usingg the approved matrix with Linebar the approved matrix with Linebargger scoriner scoringg a 90 a 90 and a Perdue a 75. . Based on the evaluation of the proposals, staff is recommendine evaluation of the proposals, staff is recommendingg award of RFP #17502 for the award of RFP #17502 for the Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Collection Services to Linebar Ad Valorem Tax Collection Services to Linebargger Goer Goggggan Blair & Sampson, LLP. an Blair & Sampson, LLP. Action Required of Council:uired of Council: Consider approval or other action awardinproval or other action awardingg for Request For Proposal #17502 for Delinquent Ad V for Request For Proposal #17502 for Delinquent Ad Valorem a Tax Collection. - M. Dolbon. - M. Dolbyy Approved for City Council Agendaor City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manageexander, City ManagerrDateDate CITY OF LA PORTE RFQ EVALUATION FORM RFP 17502 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAX COLLECTION SERVICE Vendor Name:Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP CriterionScore Maximum Points 1.) Demonstrated results of the performance of the firm for delinquent tax collections. Based on a three year (2013-2016 tax 20 30 years) summary for four surrounding existing municipal clients of delinquent tax collections that have been achieved. 2.) Proven experience in the field of delinquent property tax 25 25 collections. 3.) Experience of personnel assigned to the City's account in 20 20 connection with the collection of delinquent taxes. 4.) Historical performance levels and demonstrated capabilities. (Factors for this criteria will be based on suits filed and dismissals 20 20 from July 1,2013- June 30, 2016 from four surrounding existing municipal clients) 5.) Clarity of proposal and supporting data. 5 5 90 Totals: Signature:Cherell Daeumer, Purchasing Manager S:\\Purchasing\\2017 FY\\RFP's\\#17502 Delinquent Tax Collection Services\\Evaluations\\RFQ Evaluation Form.xls CITY OF LA PORTE RFQ EVALUATION FORM RFP 17502 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAX COLLECTION SERVICE Vendor Name:Perdue Brandon Fielder Collins and Mott LLP CriterionScore Maximum Points 1.) Demonstrated results of the performance of the firm for delinquent tax collections. Based on a three year (2013-2016 tax 10 30 years) summary for four surrounding existing municipal clients of delinquent tax collections that have been achieved. 2.) Proven experience in the field of delinquent property tax 25 25 collections. 3.) Experience of personnel assigned to the City's account in 20 20 connection with the collection of delinquent taxes. 4.) Historical performance levels and demonstrated capabilities. (Factors for this criteria will be based on suits filed and dismissals 15 20 from July 1,2013- June 30, 2016 from four surrounding existing municipal clients) 5.) Clarity of proposal and supporting data. 5 5 Totals:75 Signature:Cherell Daeumer, Purchasing Manager S:\\Purchasing\\2017 FY\\RFP's\\#17502 Delinquent Tax Collection Services\\Evaluations\\RFQ Evaluation Form.xls PERFORMANCERECORD LINEBARGERGOGGANBLAIR&SAMPSON,LLP MissouriJuly1,2013July1,2014July1,20153Year DickinsonGalvestonLeagueCityCityJune30,2014DickinsonGalvestonLeagueCityMissouriCityJune30,2015DickinsonGalvestonLeagueCityMissouriCityJune30,2016Average CollectionRecords NumberofAccounts11634132248613632286n/an/an/a1374n/an/an/an/an/an/a2286 BeginningDelinquentTaxesReceivableforall delinquenttaxyearsonJuly1. $318,423$2,078,335$1,361,832$885,632$1,161,056$323,272$2,043,220$1,452,635$949,419$1,192,137$335,355$2,164,246$1,371,229$1,026,732$1,224,391$1,192,528 TotalDelinquentTaxesCollected121,91$0$1,014,932$698,857$421,621$564,330$94,126$912,558$667,516$486,600$540,200$132,390$1,154,493$676,903$570,649$633,609$579,380 TotalPenaltiesandInterestCollected33,119$$206,500$88,996$81,395$102,503$19,833$124,032$58,555$86,321$72,185$29,993$215,636$89,965$105,447$110,260$94,983 CollectionPercentage(Base,P&I)foralldelinquent taxyears48.69%58.77%57.85%56.80%55.53%35.25%50.73%49.98%60.34%49.08%48.42%63.31%55.93%65.85%58.38%54% LitigationRecords SuitsFiled9017812158112742319936110682317558108110 PrimarySuitsFiled47178944892392315828893723157339090 IntervenorSuits4302710203504182131018251920 NumberofDemandLetters4731388717278413415949748552833131451610261005287913571337 Dismissals24586522422379291136125225222835 5źƭƒźƭƭğƌƭğƭğіƚŅƭǒźƷƭŅźƌĻķЋАіЌЌіЎЍіЌБіЌБіЌЊіЌЍіЋВіЌЊіЌЋіЊБіЋЌіЌЌіЌБіЋЏі 32% LGB&S PERFORMANCERECORD PERDUEBRANDONFIELDERCOLLINS&MOTTLLP July1,2013July1,2014July1,20153Year RosenbergFriendswoodLakeJacksonAlvinJune30,2014RosenbergFriendswoodLakeJacksonAlvinJune30,2015RosenbergFriendswoodLakeJacksonAlvinJune30,2016Average CollectionRecords NumberofAccounts1333103848111591003133110755261184102913021134476112810101014 BeginningDelinquentTaxesReceivableforall delinquenttaxyearsonJuly1.$379,774$506,517$111,565$454,960$363,204$326,615$404,775$104,695$438,611$318,674$303,836$493,309$127,581$437,830$340,639$340,839 TotalDelinquentTaxesCollected194,440$$251,083$62,055$188,566$174,036$52,613$117,995$46,538$152,329$92,369$12,880$150,054$73,746$179,612$104,073$123,493 TotalPenaltiesandInterestCollected39,345$$52,707$13,592$45,506$37,788$43,822$26,024$11,046$54,159$33,763$31,335$27,536$14,347$51,490$31,177$34,242 CollectionPercentage(Base,P&I)foralldelinquent taxyears61.56%59.98%67.81%51.45%60.20%29.53%35.58%55.00%47.08%41.80%14.55%36.00%69.05%52.78%43.10%48% LitigationRecords SuitsFiled5621112558667101676425116141726364 PrimarySuitsFiled2919113824489161622271314282122 IntervenorSuits2720381719101592430281413 NumberofDemandLetters10115984721216824163239839299485412964784201061814831 Dismissals20233814965462437141211 5źƭƒźƭƭğƌƭğƭğіƚŅƭǒźƷƭŅźƌĻķЌЏіЊЊЉіЋАіЌіЊЏіЊЌіЏЉіЌЊіЎіЊЍіЍАіЊВіЎЉіБіЊВі 16% PBFC&M PERFORMANCERECORD LINEBARGERGOGGANBLAIR&SAMPSON,LLP MissouriJuly1,2013July1,2014July1,20153Year LeagueCityCityJune30,2014June30,2015June30,2016Average DickinsonGalvestonDickinsonGalvestonLeagueCityMissouriCityDickinsonGalvestonLeagueCityMissouriCity CollectionRecords NumberofAccounts1099427721521380222711454084225014122223116341322486136322862245 BeginningDelinquentTaxesReceivableforall delinquenttaxyearsonJuly1.$318,423$2,078,335$1,361,832$885,632$1,161,056$323,272$2,043,220$1,452,635$949,419$1,192,137$335,355$2,164,246$1,371,229$1,026,732$1,224,391$1,192,528 TotalDelinquentTaxesCollected121,910$$1,014,932$698,857$421,621$564,330$94,126$912,558$667,516$486,600$540,200$132,390$1,154,493$676,903$570,649$633,609$579,380 TotalPenaltiesandInterestCollected33,119$$206,500$88,996$81,395$102,503$19,833$124,032$58,555$86,321$72,185$29,993$215,636$89,965$105,447$110,260$94,983 CollectionPercentage(Base,P&I)foralldelinquent taxyears 48.69%58.77%57.85%56.80%55.53%35.25%50.73%49.98%60.34%49.08%48.42%63.31%55.93%65.85%58.38%54% LitigationRecords SuitsFiled9017812158112742319936110682317558108110 PrimarySuitsFiled47178944892392315828893723157339090 IntervenorSuits4302710203504182131018251920 NumberofDemandLetters4731388717278413415949748552833131451610261005287913571337 Dismissals24586522422379291136125225222835 ķЋАіЌЌіЎЍіЌБіЌБіЌЊіЌЍіЋВіЌЊіЌЋіЊБіЋЌіЌЌіЌБіЋЏі 32% 5źƭƒźƭƭğƌƭğƭğіƚŅƭǒźƷƭŅźƌĻ LGB&S PERFORMANCERECORD PERDUEBRANDONFIELDERCOLLINS&MOTTLLP July1,2013July1,2014July1,20153Year RosenbergFriendswoodLakeJacksonAlvinJune30,2014RosenbergFriendswoodLakeJacksonAlvinJune30,2015RosenbergFriendswoodLakeJacksonAlvinJune30,2016Average CollectionRecords NumberofAccounts1333103848111591003133110755261184102913021134476112810101014 BeginningDelinquentTaxesReceivableforall delinquenttaxyearsonJuly1.$379,774$506,517$111,565$454,960$363,204$326,615$404,775$104,695$438,611$318,674$303,836$493,309$127,581$437,830$340,639$340,839 TotalDelinquentTaxesCollected194,440$$251,083$62,055$188,566$174,036$52,613$117,995$46,538$152,329$92,369$12,880$150,054$73,746$179,612$104,073$123,493 TotalPenaltiesandInterestCollected39,345$$52,707$13,592$45,506$37,788$43,822$26,024$11,046$54,159$33,763$31,335$27,536$14,347$51,490$31,177$34,242 CollectionPercentage(Base,P&I)foralldelinquent taxyears61.56%59.98%67.81%51.45%60.20%29.53%35.58%55.00%47.08%41.80%14.55%36.00%69.05%52.78%43.10%48% LitigationRecords SuitsFiled5621112558667101676425116141726364 PrimarySuitsFiled2919113824489161622271314282122 IntervenorSuits2720381719101592430281413 NumberofDemandLetters10115984721216824163239839299485412964784201061814831 Dismissals20233814965462437141211 5źƭƒźƭƭğƌƭğƭğіƚŅƭǒźƷƭŅźƌĻķЌЏіЊЊЉіЋАіЌіЊЏіЊЌіЏЉіЌЊіЎіЊЍіЍАіЊВіЎЉіБіЊВі 16% PBFC&M REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 N/AN/A Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Michael Dolby, Director of Michael Dolby, Director of N/AN/A Account Number:Account Number: Requested By:Requested By: Finance Finance    Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: FinanceFinance Department:Department: N/AN/A Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO    Other: AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.Plan of Finance 11 22 16Plan of Finance 11 22 16 2.ResolutionResolution 3.Debt CapacityDebt Capacity SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS During Council budget workshops, Staff presented several key wastewater infrastructure improvement During Council budget workshops, Staff presented several key wastewater infrastructure improvement projects that require funding.  Staff applied for and received approval of a loan of ($10,635,000) through projects that require funding.  Staff applied for and received approval of a loan of ($10,635,000) through the Texas Water Development Board.  the Texas Water Development Board.  Staff is requesting to move forward with funding the projects through a certificate of obligation.  Staff is Staff is requesting to move forward with funding the projects through a certificate of obligation.  Staff is requesting permission to publish a notice of intent to issue debt in a newspaper of general circulation requesting permission to publish a notice of intent to issue debt in a newspaper of general circulation within the City for two consecutive weeks.   The date of the first publication is to be at least thirtywithin the City for two consecutive weeks.   The date of the first publication is to be at least thirty--one one days (31) before date set as passage of ordinance authorizing the sale.days (31) before date set as passage of ordinance authorizing the sale. Timing for this funding is as follows:Timing for this funding is as follows: Council gives Notice of Intent to Issue:         December 12, 2016Council gives Notice of Intent to Issue:         December 12, 2016 Council meets to approve Issuance:                January 23, 2017Council meets to approve Issuance:                January 23, 2017 Anticipated Closing:                                       February 15, 2017Anticipated Closing:                                       February 15, 2017   Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action regarding a resolution authorizing publication of a notice of intention to Consider approval or other action regarding a resolution authorizing publication of a notice of intention to issue certificates of obligation.issue certificates of obligation. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate Robert V. Henderson Managing Director, Phone: (210) 805-1118 Facsimile: (210) 805-1119 robert.henderson@rbccm.com C ITY OF L A P ORTE, T EXAS P RELIMINARY P LAN OF F INANCE D ATED: N OVEMBER 21, 2016 I NTRODUCTION: -term capital planning, the City has anticipated significant improvements to its combined utility system. The City Manager, the Director of Finance advisors, improvements with minimal financial impact to the citizens of La Porte. Given the focus on maintaining competitive utility rates in the area, this examination has primarily focused on the debt capacity of the General Fund within the historical 10.5 cent Interest and Sinking Fund tax rate. The purpose of this report is to provide the results of that analysis and to provide a formal recommendation as to a Plan of Finance to fund the needed improvements F INANCIAL B ACKGROUND: Including the recently issued General Obligation Refunding Bonds Series 2016, the City of La Porte currently has ten ad valorem property tax secured debt obligations outstanding as follows: Original Currently Final Issue: Amount: Outstanding: Maturity: Certificates of Obligation, Series 2005 $1,800,000 $ 90,000 3/15/2017 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005 7,675,000 400,000 3/15/2017 Certificates of Obligation, Series 2006 5,765,000 315,000 3/15/2017 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006 1,200,000 140,000 3/15/2018 Certificates of Obligation, Series 2010 6,265,000 4,535,000 3/15/2026 General Obligation Ref. Bonds, Series 2010 4,295,000 1,705,000 3/15/2020 General Obligation Ref. Bonds, Series 2012 9,435,000 9,125,000 3/15/2025 General Obligation Ref. Bonds, Series 2014 9,300,000 8,310,000 3/15/2025 Certificates of Obligation, Series 2015 7,770,000 7,395,000 3/15/2030 General Obligation Ref. Bonds, Series 2016 3,165,000 3,135,000 3/15/2029 D EBT C APACITY IN THE G ENERAL F UND: The City continues to enjoy growth in it taxable assessed valuation (TAV). However, for the purposes of this analysis, the TAV is assumed to be the recent figure of $2.65 billion. We also assume a conservative 98.5% collection ratio. With the savings derived from the January 2016 refunding and the rapidity of existing debt repayment, the debt capacity within l Interest and Sinking Fund tax rate of 10.5 cents is calculated to be approximately $10,000,000 assuming a 20-year final maturity. Meaning, this debt can be issued with no tax rate increase. 303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 220 (210) 805-1118 RBC Capital Markets San Antonio, TX 78215 Member NYSE/SIPC City of La Porte, Texas November 21, 2016 Page 2 F INANCING A LTERNATIVES: to the public markets as it did with the Series 2015 Certificates of Obligation. However, given the nature of the utility improvements that are the focus of this financing, the City has the additional option of seeking funding through the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) under the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). The significant advantage of this program is that the State charges below market interest rates on this program on the basis of funds received from the Federal Government under the Clean Water Act. As a result of this subsidy, the TWDB has estimated an interest rate on this loan of 2.5% (please keep in mind this is an estimate provided by the TWDB prior to the Presidential election and is subject to change). Based on this interest rate estimate, the Debt Capacity of the City is increased to approximately $10,800,000. This amount exceeds the $10,635,000 value of the application submitted to the TWDB. It is our recommendation that the City avail itself of this program with its subsidized borrowing rates. C OMPLETING THE F INANCING: City adminis Consequently, resolutions requesting TWDB assistance and applications have already been filed and approved. Of course, the City is not obligated pending City Council approval. Should the Council approve, the next step would be to pass a resolution giving and authorizing publication of a Notice of Intent to issue Certificates. This State law requires this notice be published in a newspaper of local circulation twice, the first publication being not less than 30 prior to the Council taking action to actually issue the Certificates. Given that requirement and the dates of the regularly scheduled City Council meetings, this indicates the action to actually sell the Certificates cannot take place before the January 23, 2017 meeting. If approved by the Council on that date, the issue would close in mid-February at which time the City would take delivery of the full value of borrowing less fees and expenses. As a reminder from previous written plans submitted to the Council, there are three generally prescribed methods for selling public debt; Selling by competitive bid, selling on a negotiated sale basis and conducting a private placement. Selling the Certificates of Obligation to the TWDB constitutes a private placement method. As a result, the City will be able to avoid the costs of ratings, the preparation of public offering documents and the expenses related to an underwriting firm. However, please be aware that the TWDB does charge a fee for this program designed to approximate the avoided costs. It is our opinion that the subsidized interest rates more than offsets the TWDB related fees. T IMING: Timing has largely been discussed above but to recap: Council gives Notice of Intent to Issue: December 12, 2016 Council meets to approve Issuance: January 23, 2016 Anticipated Closing: February 15, 2017 S UMMARY: 303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 220 (210) 805-1118 RBC Capital Markets San Antonio, TX 78215 Member NYSE/SIPC City of La Porte, Texas November 21, 2016 Page 3 The City has multiple options with respect to financing these improvements. The result of our analysis is that the most cost effective of these alternatives is the private placement of Certificates of Obligation with the Texas Water Development Board. Further, our analysis indicates that the City can issue and pay for this debt while, barring unforeseen circumstances, keeping its Interest and Sinking Fund at its recently historical rate of 10.5 cents. It is our recommendation that the City proceed with the TWDB option. 303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 220 (210) 805-1118 RBC Capital Markets San Antonio, TX 78215 Member NYSE/SIPC RESOLUTION NO. 2016-__ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF HARRIS § CITY OF LA PORTE § Porte, Texas (the Porte, Texas, Combination Tax and Surplus R accordance with the notice hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS: Section 1. Preamble. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct. Section 2. Authorization of Notice. The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to deliver the Notice, in the form set forth in Exhibit A hereto, and to publish such Notice on behalf of the City once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper which is of general circulation in the City, the date of the first publication to be at least thirty-one (31) days before the date tentatively set in the Notice for the passage of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Certificates. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, the Mayor and City Manager are each hereby authorized to make or approve such revisions, additions, deletions, and variations to the Notice as, in the judgment of the Mayor and/or City Manager and in the opinion of Bond Counsel to the City, may be necessary or convenient to carry out or assist in carrying out the purposes of this Resolution, or as may be required for approval of the Certificates by the Attorney General of Texas; provided, however, that any change to the Notice resulting in material substantive amendments shall be subject to the prior approval of City Council. Section 3. Authorization of Other Matters Relating Thereto. The Mayor, City Secretary and other officers and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to do any and all things necessary or desirable to carry out the provisions of this Resolution. Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. HOU:3738151.1 Section 5. Public Meeting. It is officially found, determined and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given all as required by the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, as amended. (execution page follows) HOU:3738151.1 2 PASSED AND APPROVED the 12th day of December, 2016 CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS Mayor ATTEST City Secretary (SEAL) S-1 HOU:3738151.1 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas (the Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas at 6:00 p.m. on January 23, 2017, which is the time and place tentatively set for the passage of an ordinance and such other action as may be deemed valorem taxation and a pledge of surplus net revenues of the water and sewer system of the City, in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $10,635,000, bearing interest at any rate or rates, not to exceed the maximum interest rate now or hereafter authorized by law, as shall be determined within the discretion of the City Council at the time of issuance and maturing over a period of years not to exceed forty (30) years from the date thereof, for the purpose of evidencing the indebtedness of the City to pay all or any part of the costs associated with (i) the planning, acquisition, design and construction of wastewater system improvements and (ii) professional services rendered in connection therewith. S-1 HOU:3738151.1 City of La Porte, Texas Debt Capacity Analysis - Interest and Sinking Fund Supported Last Revised:12/5/2016 Base Case Study @ 10.5 Cent I & S Tax Rate ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST FiscalCurrently Outstanding I & S Tax Supported DebtFiscal YearNet TaxableTotalOtherTotalProjectedProjectedPrjctdYear EndingAssessedLT BondsCert ObligGen ObligCert ObligGen ObligCert ObligGO RefGO RefGO RefCert ObligOutstndngAvailableNetPrjctdCert ObligTotal NetTotal Ending 9-30ValuationSer 2002Ser 2005Ser 2005Ser 2006Ser 2006Ser 2010Ser 2010Ser 2012Ser 2014Ser 2015Debt ServFundsDebt ServI & SSeries 2017Debt ServI & S 9-30 2016$ 275,8052,639,625,327$ 39,824$ 404,338$ 155,949$ 72,365$ 549,619$ 349,156$ 147,289$ 241,859$ 568,539$ 2,804,742$ 75,000$ $ 0.10502,729,742 -$ 2,729,742$ 0.10502016 2017 -3,018,139,000 38,276 408,250 155,949 74,305 548,369 336,789 146,754 285,519 544,263 2,538,474 75,000 0.08292,463,474 657,500 0.10503,120,9742017 2018 -3,093,592,475 - - - 71,435 549,769 323,773 190,556 496,391 543,913 2,175,837 50,000 0.06982,125,837 676,263 0.09202,802,1002018 2019 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 548,669 309,745 283,011 665,051 543,263 2,349,739 135,000 0.07092,214,739 676,263 0.09262,891,0012019 2020 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 546,969 215,475 279,115 699,045 547,238 2,287,841 75,000 0.07082,212,841 676,263 0.09252,889,1042020 2021 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 549,569 - 773,687 473,137 545,838 2,342,231 75,000 0.07262,267,231 676,263 0.09422,943,4932021 2022 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 547,331 - 768,210 476,246 544,138 2,335,925 75,000 0.07242,260,925 676,263 0.09402,937,1872022 2023 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 545,088 - 765,345 472,199 547,062 2,329,693 75,000 0.07222,254,693 676,263 0.09382,930,9562023 2024 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 546,591 - 758,976 473,419 544,612 2,323,598 75,000 0.07202,248,598 676,263 0.09362,924,8612024 2025 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 546,700 - 752,878 253,062 546,788 2,099,428 75,000 0.06482,024,428 676,263 0.08652,700,6912025 2026 -3,170,932,287 - - - - 545,700 - - - 545,255 1,090,955 75,000 0.03251,015,955 676,263 0.05421,692,2182026 2027 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - 988,937 988,937 - 0.0317988,937 676,263 0.05331,665,2002027 2028 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - 986,062 986,062 - 0.0316986,062 676,263 0.05321,662,3252028 2029 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - 985,250 985,250 - 0.0315985,250 676,263 0.05321,661,5132029 2030 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - 710,500 710,500 - 0.0227710,500 676,263 0.04441,386,7632030 2031 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - - - - -- 676,263 0.0217676,2632031 2032 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - - - - -- 676,263 0.0217676,2632032 2033 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - - - - -- 676,263 0.0217676,2632033 2034 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - - - - -- 676,263 0.0217676,2632034 2035 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - - - - -- 676,263 0.0217676,2632035 2036 -3,170,932,287 - - - - - - - - - - - -- 676,263 0.0217676,2632036 $ 78,100275,805$ 812,588$ 311,897$ 218,105$ 6,024,372$ 1,534,938$ 4,865,821$ 4,535,928$ 9,691,658$ 28,349,212$ $ 27,489,212$ 13,506,488$ 40,995,700 Notes:1. Assumed current tax rate collection ratio is 98.5% 2. Using $2,650,000,000 Assessed Value for FYE 2016; assumes a growth rate of 2.5% per year for 4 years; at 0% thereafter. 3. Series 2017 Debt Service figures are based on a $10,635,000 issue with a 20 year debt structure assuming 2.5% . REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 N/AN/A Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Traci LeachTraci Leach Requested By:Requested By:    Account Number:Account Number: AdministrationAdministration Department:Department:    Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:    Amount Requested:Amount Requested:    Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.Amended 380 AgreementAmended 380 Agreement 2.Guaranty of PaymentGuaranty of Payment 3.Deed Without WarrantyDeed Without Warranty 4.Real Estate LienReal Estate Lien 5.Deed of TrustDeed of Trust SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS El Toro Mexican Restaurant is a local well known restaurant that has being doing business in La Porte El Toro Mexican Restaurant is a local well known restaurant that has being doing business in La Porte for over 50 years. It is owned and operated by the Ybarra family, which not only grew up in La Porte but for over 50 years. It is owned and operated by the Ybarra family, which not only grew up in La Porte but still live there. still live there. Mr. Roland Ybarra (dba as Ybarra Restaurants Inc.) is planning on building a brand new El Toro Mr. Roland Ybarra (dba as Ybarra Restaurants Inc.) is planning on building a brand new El Toro restaurant with a Hacienda feel that will not only attract local patrons but also ones visiting or staying restaurant with a Hacienda feel that will not only attract local patrons but also ones visiting or staying here.  The proposed restaurant will be a minimum of 7,500 square feet, seat over 400 patrons, and will here.  The proposed restaurant will be a minimum of 7,500 square feet, seat over 400 patrons, and will have patio dining, as well.  All 35 existing employees will be retained in La Porte and approximately 100 have patio dining, as well.  All 35 existing employees will be retained in La Porte and approximately 100 employees will be hired as a result of building this restaurant.employees will be hired as a result of building this restaurant.employees will be hired as a result of building this restaurant.employe es will be hired as a result of building this restaurant. thth In order to construct the proposed restaurant, El Toro applied for closure of the N. 25In order to construct the proposed restaurant, El Toro applied for closure of the N. 25 Street right of Street right of thth way (El Toro owns property on both sides of the N. 25way (El Toro owns property on both sides of the N. 25 Street right of way).  This application was Street right of way).  This application was approved by the Council at the October 10, 2016 meeting, along with a development agreement to approved by the Council at the October 10, 2016 meeting, along with a development agreement to waive closure fees.  waive closure fees.  Unfortunately, the closure that was approved did not include a small rectangle of property Unfortunately, the closure that was approved did not include a small rectangle of property thth (approximately 1,800 square feet) abutting the property to the north of the N. 25(approximately 1,800 square feet) abutting the property to the north of the N. 25 Street right Street right--ofof--way.  way.  This corner property was not included in the original closure application in 2015 due to lack of This corner property was not included in the original closure application in 2015 due to lack of participation by the abutting property owner.  In the interest of moving forward with the El Toro project, participation by the abutting property owner.  In the interest of moving forward with the El Toro project, that corner piece was carved out of the closure application.  Subsequent to those initial discussions in that corner piece was carved out of the closure application.  Subsequent to those initial discussions in 2015, the abutting property owner did agree to participate in the closure and signed the appropriate 2015, the abutting property owner did agree to participate in the closure and signed the appropriate documents to allow the closure to move forward.  The exhibits for the closure were never updated to documents to allow the closure to move forward.  The exhibits for the closure were never updated to reflect the agreement of the credit union. reflect the agreement of the credit union. As such, staff has considered this secondary closure as a phase two of the initial application.  The 75% As such, staff has considered this secondary closure as a phase two of the initial application.  The 75% valuation calculation method has been applied to this closure and no additional application fees were valuation calculation method has been applied to this closure and no additional application fees were charged to the applicant.  The charged to the applicant.  The ““no objectionno objection””letters from the utilities are valid for two years from the date letters from the utilities are valid for two years from the date of issue, so all letters are still applicable.  The ordinance to close this additional 1,800 square foot area of issue, so all letters are still applicable.  The ordinance to close this additional 1,800 square foot area is a companion item on this agenda.is a companion item on this agenda. The attached documents amend the development agreement and associated supporting documents to The attached documents amend the development agreement and associated supporting documents to reflect the additional closure of this property.  The 1,800 square foot area adds $8,100 to the value of the reflect the additional closure of this property.  The 1,800 square foot area adds $8,100 to the value of the incentive offered to El Toro for the construction of the new restaurant.  All performance benchmarks and incentive offered to El Toro for the construction of the new restaurant.  All performance benchmarks and timelines remain unchanged from the original documents approved on October 10, 2016.  Only the timelines remain unchanged from the original documents approved on October 10, 2016.  Only the references to the total value of the closure has been changed.references to the total value of the closure has been changed. Staff recommends approval of the amended Chapter 380 Agreement between the City of La Porte and Staff recommends approval of the amended Chapter 380 Agreement between the City of La Porte and Ybarra restaurants to construct a new El Toro restaurant.Ybarra restaurants to construct a new El Toro restaurant. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to a Chapter 380 Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to a Chapter 380 Agreement between the City of La Porte and Ybarra Restaurants, Inc. and all associated documents for Agreement between the City of La Porte and Ybarra Restaurants, Inc. and all associated documents for waiver of payment for closure of street right of way for the construction of a new El Toro restaurant.waiver of payment for closure of street right of way for the construction of a new El Toro restaurant. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate DEED WITHOUT WARRANTY NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. Date: ___________, 2016 Grantor: City of La Porte, Texas, a municipal corporation Mailing Address: 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, TX 77571 Grantee: Ybarra Restaurants, Inc., a Texas corporation Mailing Address: 7529 Bayway Drive, Baytown, Texas 77520 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) cash and other good and valuable considerations Vendor's Lien Note: $124,200.00 Further Consideration: The execution and delivery by the said Grantee of one certain amended promissory note of even date herewith in the principal sum shown above as Vendor's Lien Note, payable to the order of Grantor, bearing interest at the rate therein specified, providing for attorney's fees and acceleration of maturity at the rate and in the events therein set forth, and payment of said note being secured by Vendor's Lien and Superior Title retained herein in favor of said Grantor, and by amended and restated Deed of Trust of even date herewith, from Grantee to CLARK T. ASKINS, Trustee, to which reference is here made for all purposes; have GRANTED, SOLD and CONVEYED, and by these presents does GRANT, SELL and CONVEY unto the said Grantee, the following described property, to-wit: Property (including any improvements): BEGINNING at a point located at the northwest corner of Block 708, Town of La Porte, said point being located on the east line of the North 25th Street Right-ofWay and the south line of the West Polk Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a westerly direction, along the projected south line of the West Polk Street Right-of- Way to its intersection with the center line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a northerly direction along the projected center line of the North 25th Street Right-of- Way to its intersection with the north line of the West Polk St. Right-of-Way; THENCE in an easterly direction, along the north line of the W of the North 25th Street Right-of- Way to its intersection with the east line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a southerly direction, along the projected east line of the North 25th Street Right-of- Way to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract, which was vacated, abandoned and closed by City of La Porte Ordinance No. 2016-_______ passed and approved by the City Council of the City of La Porte on the ______ day of _____________, 2016. Reservations from and Exception to Conveyance and Warranty: This conveyance is made subject to all and singular the restrictions, conditions, oil, gas, and other mineral reservations, easements, and covenants, if any, applicable to and enforceable against the above described property as reflected by the records of the county clerk of the aforesaid county. Grantor for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance, conveys to Grantee the property without express or implied warranty, and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are excluded. Attest: City of La Porte, Texas __________________________________ By:_________________________________ Patrice Fogarty Corby D. Alexander City Secretary City Manager Approved: ____________________________ Clark T. Askins Assistant City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF HARRIS § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____ day of ______________, 2016, by Corby D. Alexander, City Manager of the City of La Porte, Texas, a municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: PREPARED IN THE LAW OFFICE OF: ASKINS & ASKINS, P.C. ASKINS & ASKINS, P.C. P.O. Box 1218 P.O. Box 1218 La Porte, TX 77572-1218 La Porte, TX 77572-1218 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Appropriation Agenda Date Requested December 12, 2016 Source of Funds:N/A Requested By: Corby Alexander Account Number:N/A Department:City Manager Amount Budgeted:N/A Report:Resolution: Ordinance: Amount Requested: N/A Exhibit: Chapter 70 Ordinance Amendment Budgeted Item:YESNO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION While enforcing Chapter 70 s (which regulates truck parking), staff discovered a potential area of concern with the ordinance as currently written. The ordinance clearly addresses parking requirements for commercial motor vehicles in La Porte. However, the ordinance is less clear on regulations regarding where these commercial motor vehicles re-fuel. Council met with the City Attorney to discuss options and ascertain the level of restriction desired that should be imposed. The enclosed ordinance clarifies that commercial motor vehicles will only be permitted to re-fuel at approved locations ling in combination (i.e. both truck and trailer). Vehicles not in combination (bobtails) will be allowed to fuel elsewhere in the community, provided those location have a site plan approved to accommodate commercial motor vehicles. This approach mirrors that taken to truck parking in the most recent amendment to this ordinance. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action s. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE AFFIC AND VEHICLES ORDINANCES BY AMENDING TRUCK ROUTE REGULATIONS TO ADD SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTABLISHMENTS OFFERING FUEL TO COMMERCIAL VEHICLES; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON VIOLATING THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE DEEMED GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR AND UPON CONVICTION SHALL BE FINED IN A SUM NOT TO EXCEED FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS; PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS: Section 1: Section 70-233 Exception to Section 70-232: point of origin; parking of commercial motor vehicles Texas Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: ec. 70-233. - Exception to Section 70-232: point of origin; parking of commercial motor vehicles; acquiring fuel. (a) The provisions of Section 70-232 of this Code notwithstanding, in those instances where any commercial motor vehicles originating within the corporate limits of the city, shall have as its point of origin a point located off a designated truck route, it shall proceed to the nearest point on a designated truck route by the most direct route possible. If such commercial motor vehicles shall originate outside the corporate limits of the city and enter the city at a point which is not on a designated truck route, it shall proceed to the nearest point on a designated truck route by the most direct route possible. (b) In those cases where commercial motor vehicles originate off a designated truck route, whether inside or outside the corporate limits of the city, and the destination of the commercial motor vehicle is nearer the origin or point of entering the corporate limits of the city than is the nearest point on a designated truck route by the most direct route possible, it shall not be necessary to proceed to the nearest designated truck route. (c) Commercial motor vehicles not in combination with a trailer or transporting a placarded load of hazardous materials may travel to and park at locations off a designated truck route by taking the most direct route possible, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, provided that the location is not in a residentially zoned area and is at a site physically capable of accommodating customer commercial motor vehicle parking by means of a parking facility striping plan 1) configured to allow for the safe parking of commercial motor vehicles, and 2) approved by the Planning Department of the City in accordance with the requirements of Section 70-237 of this Chapter. (d) Combination commercial motor vehicles, other than vehicles transporting a placarded load of hazardous cargo, may travel to and park at locations contiguous to and fronting a designated truck route, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, provided that the location is at a site physically capable of accommodating customer commercial motor vehicle parking specific to commercial motor vehicles in combination with a trailer, by means of a parking striping plan 1) configured to allow for the safe parking of combination commercial motor vehicles, and 2) approved by the Planning Department of the City in accordance with the requirements of Section 70-237 of this Chapter. (e) Commercial motor vehicles not in combination with a trailer, other than vehicles transporting a placarded load of hazardous cargo, may travel to establishments located contiguous to and fronting a designated truck route, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, for the purpose of acquiring fuel for the operation of the vehicle. However, in such cases the commercial motor vehicle is eligible to acquire fuel only where the establishment is equipped with fuel dispensing facilities that are designed to safely accommodate customer commercial motor vehicles not in combination with a trailer, in accordance with a site use plan approved by the Planning Department of the City pursuant to Section 70-237(b) of this Chapter. (f) Combination commercial motor vehicles, may travel to establishments 1) located contiguous to and fronting a -1 of this Code, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, for the purpose of acquiring fuel for the operation of the vehicle. However, in such cases the commercial motor vehicle is eligible to acquire fuel only where the establishment is equipped with fuel dispensing facilities that are designed to safely accommodate customer commercial motor vehicles (including those in combination with a trailer), in accordance with a site use plan approved by the Planning Department of the pursuant to Section 70-237(b) of this Chapter. Section 2: 70-or Accommo Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 70-237. Parking Plan for Accommodation of Commercial Motor Vehicle; Site Use Plan for use of Fuel Dispensing Facilities. (a) The owner or operator of any existing or proposed site in which parking is sought for accommodation of customer commercial motor vehicles, including combination commercial motor vehicles, where the site is physically capable of safely accommodating such vehicles, shall be required to submit to the Planning and Development Department for approval a parking facility striping plan as a component of a proposed site plan, or as an amending document to a previously approved (if one exists) site plan. The applicant for the site plan or amended site plan shall be allowed the option of striping up to 15% of the required automobile parking as dual use parking spots for the accommodation of commercial motor vehicle parking, and shall be so striped and labeled. Such allocation shall generally be located within the parking spaces least used. (b) The owner or operator of any existing or proposed site in which fuel dispensing facilities are proposed for use by commercial motor vehicles (including those in combination with a trailer), where the site is physically capable of safely 2 accommodating such vehicles, shall be required to submit to the Planning and Development Department for approval a site use plan as a component of a proposed site plan, or as an amending document to a previously approved (if one exists) site plan. The site use plan shall 1) provide maneuvering space in proximity to fuel dispensing facilities to allow commercial motor vehicles to safely position into and depart from lanes dedicated for use of fuel dispensing facilities; 2) provide that such lanes be of sufficient width to accommodate commercial motor vehicles using the fuel dispensing facilities; and 3) provide adequate height clearance for commercial motor vehicles using the fuel dispensing facilities. Section 3. Any person, as defined in Section 1.07 (27), Texas Penal Code, who shall violate any provision of the ordinance, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00). Section 4. Each and every provision, paragraph, sentence and clause of this Ordinance has been separately considered and passed by the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas, and each said provision would have been separately passed without any other provision, and if any provision hereof shall be ineffective, invalid or unconstitutional, for any cause, it shall not impair or affect the remaining portion, or any part thereof, but the valid portion shall be in force just as if it had been passed alone. Section 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict only. Section 6. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council is posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the city for the time required by law preceding this meeting, this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective sixty (60) days after its passage and approval. The City Secretary shall give notice of the passage of this ordinance by causing the caption hereof to be published in the official newspaper of the City of La Porte at least once within ten (10) days after the passage of this ordinance. PASSED AND APPROVED this the______ day of NOVEMBER, 2016. CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS By: Louis R. Rigby, Mayor ATTEST: 3 City Secretary APPROVED: Assistant City Attorney 4 ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE AFFIC AND VEHICLES ORDINANCES BY AMENDING TRUCK ROUTE REGULATIONS TO ADD SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTABLISHMENTS OFFERING FUEL TO COMMERCIAL VEHICLES; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON VIOLATING THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE DEEMED GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR AND UPON CONVICTION SHALL BE FINED IN A SUM NOT TO EXCEED FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS; PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS: Section 1: Section 70-233 Exception to Section 70-232: point of origin; parking of commercial motor vehicles Texas Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: ec. 70-233. - Exception to Section 70-232: point of origin; parking of commercial motor vehicles; acquiring fuel. (a) The provisions of Section 70-232 of this Code notwithstanding, in those instances where any commercial motor vehicles originating within the corporate limits of the city, shall have as its point of origin a point located off a designated truck route, it shall proceed to the nearest point on a designated truck route by the most direct route possible. If such commercial motor vehicles shall originate outside the corporate limits of the city and enter the city at a point which is not on a designated truck route, it shall proceed to the nearest point on a designated truck route by the most direct route possible. (b) In those cases where commercial motor vehicles originate off a designated truck route, whether inside or outside the corporate limits of the city, and the destination of the commercial motor vehicle is nearer the origin or point of entering the corporate limits of the city than is the nearest point on a designated truck route by the most direct route possible, it shall not be necessary to proceed to the nearest designated truck route. (c) Commercial motor vehicles not in combination with a trailer or transporting a placarded load of hazardous materials may travel to and park at locations off a designated truck route by taking the most direct route possible, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, provided that the location is not in a residentially zoned area and is at a site physically capable of accommodating customer commercial motor vehicle parking by means of a parking facility striping plan 1) configured to allow for the safe parking of commercial motor vehicles, and 2) approved by the Planning Department of the City in accordance with the requirements of Section 70-237 of this Chapter. (d) Combination commercial motor vehicles, other than vehicles transporting a placarded load of hazardous cargo, may travel to and park at locations contiguous to and fronting a designated truck route, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, provided that the location is at a site physically capable of accommodating customer commercial motor vehicle parking specific to commercial motor vehicles in combination with a trailer, by means of a parking striping plan 1) configured to allow for the safe parking of combination commercial motor vehicles, and 2) approved by the Planning Department of the City in accordance with the requirements of Section 70-237 of this Chapter. (e) Commercial motor vehicles not in combination with a trailer, other than vehicles transporting a placarded load of hazardous cargo, may travel to establishments located contiguous to and fronting a designated truck route, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, for the purpose of acquiring fuel for the operation of the vehicle. However, in such cases the commercial motor vehicle is eligible to acquire fuel only where the establishment is equipped with fuel dispensing facilities that are designed to safely accommodate customer commercial motor vehicles not in combination with a trailer, in accordance with a site use plan approved by the Planning Department of the City pursuant to Section 70-237(b) of this Chapter. (f) Combination commercial motor vehicles, may travel to establishments 1) located contiguous to and fronting a -1 of this Code, regardless of whether the operator of the commercial motor vehicle is loading or unloading cargo, providing services, or seeking repairs at a legitimate repair facility, for the purpose of acquiring fuel for the operation of the vehicle. However, in such cases the commercial motor vehicle is eligible to acquire fuel only where the establishment is equipped with fuel dispensing facilities that are designed to safely accommodate customer commercial motor vehicles (including those in combination with a trailer), in accordance with a site use plan approved by the Planning Department of the pursuant to Section 70-237(b) of this Chapter. Section 2: 70-n for Accommo Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 70-237. Parking Plan for Accommodation of Commercial Motor Vehicle; Site Use Plan for use of Fuel Dispensing Facilities. (a) The owner or operator of any existing or proposed site in which parking is sought for accommodation of customer commercial motor vehicles, including combination commercial motor vehicles, where the site is physically capable of safely accommodating such vehicles, shall be required to submit to the Planning and Development Department for approval a parking facility striping plan as a component of a proposed site plan, or as an amending document to a previously approved (if one exists) site plan. The applicant for the site plan or amended site plan shall be allowed the option of striping up to 15% of the required automobile parking as dual use parking spots for the accommodation of commercial motor vehicle parking, and shall be so striped and labeled. Such allocation shall generally be located within the parking spaces least used. 2 (b) The owner or operator of any existing or proposed site in which fuel dispensing facilities are proposed for use by commercial motor vehicles (including those in combination with a trailer), where the site is physically capable of safely accommodating such vehicles, shall be required to submit to the Planning and Development Department for approval a site use plan as a component of a proposed site plan, or as an amending document to a previously approved (if one exists) site plan. The site use plan shall 1) provide maneuvering space in proximity to fuel dispensing facilities to allow commercial motor vehicles to safely position into and depart from lanes dedicated for use of fuel dispensing facilities; 2) provide that such lanes be of sufficient width to accommodate commercial motor vehicles using the fuel dispensing facilities; and 3) provide adequate height clearance for commercial motor vehicles using the fuel dispensing facilities. Section 3. Any person, as defined in Section 1.07 (27), Texas Penal Code, who shall violate any provision of the ordinance, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00). Section 4. Each and every provision, paragraph, sentence and clause of this Ordinance has been separately considered and passed by the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas, and each said provision would have been separately passed without any other provision, and if any provision hereof shall be ineffective, invalid or unconstitutional, for any cause, it shall not impair or affect the remaining portion, or any part thereof, but the valid portion shall be in force just as if it had been passed alone. Section 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict only. Section 6. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council is posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the city for the time required by law preceding this meeting, hat this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective sixty (60) days after its passage and approval. The City Secretary shall give notice of the passage of this ordinance by causing the caption hereof to be published in the official newspaper of the City of La Porte at least once within ten (10) days after the passage of this ordinance. PASSED AND APPROVED this the______ day of NOVEMBER, 2016. CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS By: Louis R. Rigby, Mayor 3 ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED: Assistant City Attorney 4 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 City of Morgan's City of Morgan's Source of Funds:Source of Funds: PointPoint Don PennellDon Pennell Requested By:Requested By:    Public WorksPublic WorksAccount Number:Account Number: Department:Department:    Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:      Other:Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.MPT Draft Water Purchase Interlocal MPT Draft Water Purchase Interlocal AgreementAgreement 2.Attachment for ILAAttachment for ILA SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS Water supply problems can arise in all phases of emergency or disasterWater supply problems can arise in all phases of emergency or disaster--management cycles.  As with management cycles.  As with other elements of emergency management, water supplies can be designed and maintained in ways other elements of emergency management, water supplies can be designed and maintained in ways that help to reduce the health impacts of disasters/emergencies.that help to reduce the health impacts of disasters/emergencies. The City of MorganThe City of Morgan’’s Point approached City staff with this in mind and proposed an emergency water s Point approached City staff with this in mind and proposed an emergency water line interconnect that would, in cases of emergency/disaster, allow for a backline interconnect that would, in cases of emergency/disaster, allow for a back--up source of potable up source of potable water.  The City of Morganwater.  The City of Morgan’’s Point presented the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) to its City Council November s Point presented the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) to its City Council November 8, 2016 at its regular City Council meeting and received approval to present to the City of La Porte8, 2016 at its regular City Council meeting and received approval to present to the City of La Porte’s City Council for consideration.  Council for consideration.  This ILA will establish the right and duties of each City in relation to water capacity, whereby MorganThis ILA will establish the right and duties of each City in relation to water capacity, whereby Morgan’s Point may purchase additional potable water from the City of La Porte on an emergency basis.  Point may purchase additional potable water from the City of La Porte on an emergency basis.  Morgan’s Point shall compensate La Porte at a rate equal to 150% of the standard utility rate charged to s Point shall compensate La Porte at a rate equal to 150% of the standard utility rate charged to customers situated within La Porte. The City of La Porte reserves the right to suspend water service to customers situated within La Porte. The City of La Porte reserves the right to suspend water service to Morgan’s Point through the water interconnect if there is not an adequate water supply available to meet s Point through the water interconnect if there is not an adequate water supply available to meet the demands of the City of La Porte customers. the demands of the City of La Porte customers. The approval of this ILA commits the City of MorganThe approval of this ILA commits the City of Morgan’’s Point to design and construct a new metered s Point to design and construct a new metered water main at the intersection of Blackwell and East Main Street in the City of La Porte and extending water main at the intersection of Blackwell and East Main Street in the City of La Porte and extending approximately 350 LF east to connect to the Morganapproximately 350 LF east to connect to the Morgan’’s Point water distribution system.  The design and s Point water distribution system.  The design and construction requires approval from the TCEQ prior to releasing water into the Morganconstruction requires approval from the TCEQ prior to releasing water into the Morgan’’s Point system.  s Point system.  Morgan’s Point will coordinate all reviews and approvals.  In addition Morgans Point will coordinate all reviews and approvals.  In addition Morgan’’s Point is prohibited from s Point is prohibited from using this interconnect to meet its minimum requirements for capacity.using this interconnect to meet its minimum requirements for capacity. Both cities believe this to be of mutual benefit relating to mutual aid and to protect public health.  The Both cities believe this to be of mutual benefit relating to mutual aid and to protect public health.  The agreement is proposed as a fiveagreement is proposed as a five--year term, with an additional fiveyear term, with an additional five--year term with mutual agreement by year term with mutual agreement by both parties. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute and the City Secretary to attest to an Consider approval or other action authorizing the Mayor to execute and the City Secretary to attest to an Interlocal Agreement with the City of MorganInterlocal Agreement with the City of Morgan’’s Point to provide an emergency water main interconnect.s Point to provide an emergency water main interconnect. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN FOR PURCHASE OF TREATED WATER This Interlocal Agreement is made and entered into pursuant to the Texas Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter City of La Porte, Texas ("La Porte") and the City of , Texas ("") for the purpose of providing an emergency water main interconnection to function as a backup source of potable . TERMS OF AGREEMENT IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, covenants, obligations, and benefits in this Agreement, the above- mentioned parties agree upon the terms outlined below, and in accordance therewith may file this Agreement and request : RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF LA PORTE 1.1 La Porte represents that it has the right to purchase additional water capacity through its existing agreement with the City of Houston Southeast Water Treatment Plant in amounts sufficient to cover anticipated La Porte agrees that on an emergency basis, it will sell treated water to as a source of potable water through the water main interconnect to be constructed by in La Porte, into water distribution system . 1.2 La Porte shall provide water of the same quality and standard being furnished to its own customers. La Porte shall have no responsibility for the quality or pressure of water once it passes through the Project into distribution system. 1.3 through the water main interconnect if for any reason there is not an adequate water supply to meet the requirements of the citizens of La Porte. 1.4 La Porte agrees to waive all standby or other charges for any period of time not receive water through the Project. 1.5 La Porte shall provide a written notice of any rate increases at least sixty (60) days prior to the effective date of the rate increase. 2.1 he new metered water main interconnect at or near the intersection of S. Blackwell Street and East Main Street in La Porte, and extending approximately 350 feet east to connect to the existing water distribution system. shall 1) provide an engineered design of the Project compatible with the Neptune Automated Meter Reading system utilized by the City of La Porte to the Public Works Director of La Porte for approval; 2) manage the construction of the Project; and 3) be responsible for all maintenance of the Project for the period that the interconnect remains connected to La Porte- Page 1 of 4 both water distribution systems. The Project shall include double check valve assembly and backflow 2.2 shall coordinate with the TCEQ on securing all necessary reviews and approvals for the Project. La Porte shall also approve the design, construction, and any maintenance activity on the interconnect Project prior to releasing water into the system. 2.3 Subject to Texas Administrative Code Section 290.46(k) or subsequent revisions made thereto, the interconnect will not be operated, if for any reason the water in either system is not of safe sanitary quality. is prohibited from using the capacity obtained through the interconnect to comply with any current or future TCEQ minimum capacity requirement for public water systems. 2.5 Whenever possible, shall inform La Porte twenty-four (24) hours prior to water usage so as to allow La Porte sufficient time to make any necessary system changes to supply the requested water. When prior notification is not possible, shall contact the La Porte Public Works Department (during regular business hours) or the La Porte Police Department (after hours). 2.6 shall compensate La Porte at a rate equal to 150% of the standard utility rate charged to customers situated within La Porte. This Agreement is subject to the Texas Prompt Payment Act. T EX. G OVT C ODE § 2251.001, et seq. of the water main interconnect and ensure the water delivery rate shall not exceed 600 gallons per minute. In any case where the water delivery rate exceeds 600 gallons per minute, the flow shall not be for a period longer than four (4) consecutive hours. Normal anticipated daily flow rate is equal to 120 gallons per minute (based on a 4 year average of 176,000 gallons per day (2016)). The seasonal peak anticipated daily flow rate is equal to 200 gallons per minute (based on the daily average of the peak usage month 287,000 gallons per day (July 2014)). TERM AND TERMINATION 3.1 This Agreement shall continue in force and effect for five (5) years from the Effective Date and shall be renewable for one (1) additional five (5) year term mutual agreement of both parties, unless sooner terminated for cause or by mutual written consent of the parties. Additionally, either party may terminate this Agreement without cause. Notice of intent to terminate with or without cause, or to not renew, shall be provided by the terminating party to the opposite party a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the intended date of termination. MISCELLANEOUS 4.1 Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced under the laws of the La Porte- Page 2 of 4 State of Texas. 4.2 INDEMNIFICATION. LA PORTE SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE TO OR ANY OTHER PARTY OR PARTIES FOR ANY CLAIMS, DEMANDS, LOSSES, SUITS, JUDGMENTS FOR DAMAGE OR INJURIES TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY BY REASON OF THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, OPERATION OF THE REQUESTED INTERCONNECT PROJECT OR THE ASSOCIATED SUPPLY OF WATER (INCLUDING THE QUALITY OR PRESSURE) TO POINT. HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD LA PORTE HARMLESS AGAINST ALL SUCH CLAIMS, LOSSES, DEMANDS, SUITS AND JUDGMENTS TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. 4.2 Modification. This Agreement shall be subject to change or modification only with the written mutual consent of each of the parties hereto. 4.3 Assignability of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors, heirs, representatives, and assigns. This Agreement, and all rights, duties, and obligations hereunder, shall not be assignable by either Party without the prior written consent of the other Party. 4.4 Relationship of Parties. Neither party shall be considered the agent, partner, fiduciary or employee of any other party, in its performance of any and all duties under any transactions contemplated by this Agreement. No Party shall be deemed to have any fiduciary relationship to any other party. 4.5 Severability. Should and provision of this Agreement be declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 4.6 Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the parties, and shall not be construed to confer any benefit or right upon any third party. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of, and may be enforced only by, the parties to this Agreement. No other third party shall have standing to enforce any provision of this Agreement. 4.7 Merger. This Agreement, together with the exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the subject matter hereof. 4.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original instrument, but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one agreement. 4.9 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of La Porte and 4.10 Authority to Contract. Both parties warrant and represent that this Agreement has been approved by the governing bodies of each city prior to execution. La Porte- Page 3 of 4 CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS Louis Rigby, Mayor ATTEST: Patrice Fogarty, TRMC City Secretary CITY OF POINT, TEXAS Michel Bechtel, Mayor ATTEST: Megan Mayes, City Secretary La Porte- Page 4 of 4 Main Street Yellow line represents proposed water line of Blackwell Street and Main Street. Line runs east 350 feet to the east connecting with the City REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 General Fund General Fund Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Don Pennell Don Pennell Requested By:Requested By: 001001--70727072--532532-- Account Number:Account Number: 20152015 Public WorksPublic Works Department:Department: $ 148,995$ 148,995 Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted:   $ 148,995$ 148,995 Other:Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.#17005 Public Bid Tabulation#17005 Public Bid Tabulation 2.#17005 Notifications & Access Report#17005 Notifications & Access Report SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS The City’s solid waste ordinance (Section 58s solid waste ordinance (Section 58--36) stipulates that residential solid waste customers use 36) stipulates that residential solid waste customers use plastic garbage bags provided by the City.  The City orders 27,500 rolls of garbage bags most years.  plastic garbage bags provided by the City.  The City orders 27,500 rolls of garbage bags most years.  Each residential account is eligible for 3 free rolls of bags per year and residents may purchase Each residential account is eligible for 3 free rolls of bags per year and residents may purchase additional rolls throughout the year if needed.  additional rolls throughout the year if needed.  The Public Works Department with assistance from the Parks Department plan to deliver garbage bags The Public Works Department with assistance from the Parks Department plan to deliver garbage bags to door steps February 8, 9 and 10, 2017. Where bags cannot be placed at the doorstep they will be to door steps February 8, 9 and 10, 2017. Where bags cannot be placed at the doorstep they will be placed at the side of the driveway as close to the house as possible. Where the bags cannot be placed placed at the side of the driveway as close to the house as possible. Where the bags cannot be placed the Public Works or Parks employee will note to their Supervisor the location and a letter will be mailed the Public Works or Parks employee will note to their Supervisor the location and a letter will be mailed to the resident to pick up their bags at Public Works or City Hall.to the resident to pick up their bags at Public Works or City Hall.to the resident to pick up their bags at Public Works or City Hall.to the resident to pick up their bags at Public Works or City Hall. The Solid Waste Division will order 33,000 rolls of garbage bags. Currently there are approximately The Solid Waste Division will order 33,000 rolls of garbage bags. Currently there are approximately 10,350 residential accounts at 3 rolls per residence equals 31,050 rolls. This will leave 1,950 rolls city 10,350 residential accounts at 3 rolls per residence equals 31,050 rolls. This will leave 1,950 rolls city for sales and new customer distribution in addition to 1920 rolls Public Works currently has in stock as for sales and new customer distribution in addition to 1920 rolls Public Works currently has in stock as of November 17, 2016. of November 17, 2016. Bids for the advertised sealed bid (Bid #17005) for plastic garbage bags were opened and read on Bids for the advertised sealed bid (Bid #17005) for plastic garbage bags were opened and read on October 15, 2016.   Bid notification was accessed online by 25 vendors, with 7 returning bids.  A request October 15, 2016.   Bid notification was accessed online by 25 vendors, with 7 returning bids.  A request for bids was also advertised in the Bay Area Observer and posted on the City website.  for bids was also advertised in the Bay Area Observer and posted on the City website.  The lowest and best bid for the bag sizes was submitted by Houston Poly Bag for $4.39 per 52 bag roll The lowest and best bid for the bag sizes was submitted by Houston Poly Bag for $4.39 per 52 bag roll of 33 gallon bags representing a total of $144,870.00 for 33,000 rolls (a 2 percent decrease over last of 33 gallon bags representing a total of $144,870.00 for 33,000 rolls (a 2 percent decrease over last year at $4.48 per roll).year at $4.48 per roll). Solid Waste performed a hang test on sample bags provided by the proposed vendor and confirmed Solid Waste performed a hang test on sample bags provided by the proposed vendor and confirmed that the vendorthat the vendor’’s bag has adequate strength.  The hang test consists of placing 75s bag has adequate strength.  The hang test consists of placing 75--lbs of sand inside lbs of sand inside the bag and hanging the bag for a minimum of two minutes.  the bag and hanging the bag for a minimum of two minutes.  The FY 16-17 budget for this item is $148,995.  17 budget for this item is $148,995.  Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action awarding Bid No. 15017 for 33,000 rolls of 1.5 mil, 33 gallon plastic Consider approval or other action awarding Bid No. 15017 for 33,000 rolls of 1.5 mil, 33 gallon plastic garbage bags to Houston Poly Bag in the amount of $144,870.00 and $4,125 in contingency to purchase garbage bags to Houston Poly Bag in the amount of $144,870.00 and $4,125 in contingency to purchase additional bags should counter sales or new residential services increase.  additional bags should counter sales or new residential services increase.  Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate Sealed Bid #17005 Central Poly CorpHouston Poly Bag Jadcore, LLCInterboro PackagingDyna PakWaste ZeroAll American Poly Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended PricePricePricePricePricePricePricePricePricePricePricePricePricePrice QTYUOM 33 gallon 1.5 mil plastic garbage bags as per specifications30500RLS4.83$147,3155.48$167,1404.76$145,1804.69$143,0454.8$146,4004.39$133,8958.9$271,450 10-14 30-40 14-21 30 days ARO30 AROAROBUS daysARO Delivery30 ARO10-30 ARO Bid tabulation is preliminary information only and does not indicate any type of award. Other considerations may apply. Notification and Access Report to Sealed Bid #17005 - Plastic Garbage Bags NOTIFICATIONS REPORT: Vendor NameDate All American 2016-10-20 07:27:06 Alta One, LLC2016-10-20 07:27:06 Ambassador Services2016-10-20 07:27:06 Building Blocks of Wealth Empowerment, LLC2016-10-20 07:27:06 Calico Industries, Inc.2016-10-20 07:27:06 Caltex Plastics Inc.2016-10-20 07:27:06 CENTRAL POLY-BAG CORP. 2016-10-20 14:38:55 CrimeTech, Inc.2016-10-20 07:27:06 Discount Plastic Bags and Packaging LLC2016-10-20 07:27:06 DYNA PAK CORP2016-10-20 14:38:55 Element Solutions International LLC2016-10-20 07:27:06 FOX-RICH TEXTILES INC.2016-10-20 07:27:06 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE, LTD.2016-10-20 07:27:06 Hillyard, Inc.2016-10-20 07:27:06 Houston Poly Bag2016-10-21 10:38:42 HUCKSTER PACKAGING AND SUPPLY2016-10-20 14:38:55 Interboro Packaging Corporation2016-10-20 14:38:55 Jadcore, Inc.2016-10-20 14:38:55 JetCo Solutions2016-10-20 07:27:06 Kleen Janitorial Supply Co2016-10-20 07:27:06 Maglin Site Furniture2016-10-20 07:27:06 Nasco2016-10-20 07:27:06 National Shipping Supply2016-10-20 07:27:06 Onvia2016-10-20 14:38:55 Platinum Paper and Packaging2016-10-20 07:27:06 Pollock Paper Distributors2016-10-20 07:27:06 Pumps, Motors & Controls, Inc.2016-10-20 07:27:06 Ritz Safety LLC2016-10-20 14:38:55 Royal Media Network Inc.2016-11-03 13:42:51 Safeway Supply, Inc.2016-10-20 14:38:55 Semiconductor Equipment Services Corporation2016-10-20 07:27:06 SiteOne Landscape Supply2016-10-20 07:27:06 Sunset Survival & First Aid, Inc.2016-10-20 07:27:06 Unipak Corp.2016-10-20 14:38:55 WasteZero, Inc2016-10-20 07:27:06 ACCESS REPORT: VENDOR NAME:DATE All American 2016-10-20 03:32 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Aziaa Corp2016-10-25 03:15 AM CDT BidClerk2016-11-01 01:34 PM CDT Calico Industries of Florida LLC2016-10-20 10:21 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf CAPITAL PLASTICS INT'L INC.2016-10-21 02:24 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf CENTRAL POLY-BAG CORP. 2016-10-20 08:50 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Charter Communications2016-10-25 06:53 AM CDT DYNA PAK CORP2016-10-20 11:26 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf global soft inc2016-10-27 03:18 PM CDT HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE, LTD.2016-10-28 02:03 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Hendee Enterprises, Inc. 2016-11-01 02:06 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Hillyard, Inc.2016-10-21 01:17 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Houston Poly Bag2016-10-21 10:38 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf HUCKSTER PACKAGING AND SUPPLY2016-10-20 02:12 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Interboro Packaging Corporation2016-10-20 09:46 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Jadcore, Inc.2016-10-20 09:37 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Lindsay Circle, LLC2016-10-26 10:56 PM CDT North America Procurement Council2016-10-22 03:31 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Onvia2016-10-20 01:01 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Perkens WS Corporation2016-10-24 04:18 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf QT & Associates of Miami, Inc2016-10-21 09:29 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Ritz Safety LLC2016-10-20 01:40 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Royal Media Network Inc.2016-11-03 02:43 PM CDT Safeway Supply, Inc.2016-10-20 11:09 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Sam Anderson Pvt Ltd2016-10-20 08:52 AM CDT SMS AMBASSADORS CORP2016-10-25 12:10 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf The Blue Book Building & Construction Network2016-10-27 04:00 PM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Tukmol General Contractor2016-10-21 03:25 AM CDT Unipak Corp.2016-10-20 08:39 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf Vendor Support Account2016-10-26 01:06 PM CDT WasteZero, Inc2016-10-20 08:36 AM CDT#17005 Plastic Garbage Bags.pdf REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 N/AN/A Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Brian Sterling Brian Sterling Requested By:Requested By: N/AN/A Account Number:Account Number: Planning & DevelopmentPlanning & Development Department:Department: N/AN/A Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: N/AN/A Amount Requested:Amount Requested:    Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.OrdinanceOrdinance 2.DeedDeed 3.Appraisal SummaryAppraisal Summary 4.CenterPoint ResponseCenterPoint Response 5.AT&T ResponseAT&T Response 6.Comcast ResponseComcast Response 7.Area MapArea Map SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS Staff has received and processed an application from El Toro Mexican Restaurants to vacate, abandon Staff has received and processed an application from El Toro Mexican Restaurants to vacate, abandon thth and close a 1,800 square foot remnant of the intersection of the North 25and close a 1,800 square foot remnant of the intersection of the North 25 Street and West Polk Street Street and West Polk Street Rights-of-Way (see Area Map).  Way (see Area Map).  The purpose of the closing request is to complete the companyThe purpose of the closing request is to complete the company’’s s thth acquisition of the entire North 25acquisition of the entire North 25 Street Right Street Right--ofof--Way from West Main St. to the north line of the West Way from West Main St. to the north line of the West Polk Street RightPolk Street Right--ofof--Way.  Way.  SStafftaff’’s review of the closing application has determined that no public or franchised utilities exist within s review of the closing application has determined that no public or franchised utilities exist within s review of the closing application has determined that no public or franchised utilities exist within s review of the closing application has determined that no public or franchised utilities exist within the subject rightsthe subject rights--ofof--way to be closed.   way to be closed.    In accordance with Section 62.35 of the Code of Ordinances, an independent appraisal of the subject  In accordance with Section 62.35 of the Code of Ordinances, an independent appraisal of the subject right-of-way has been conducted to determine fair market value.  The appraisal established a value of way has been conducted to determine fair market value.  The appraisal established a value of $6.00 per square foot for 1,800 sq. feet of right$6.00 per square foot for 1,800 sq. feet of right--ofof--way to be closed.  The total closing fee for the subject way to be closed.  The total closing fee for the subject abandonment (with 25% discount by ordinance) is $8,100.abandonment (with 25% discount by ordinance) is $8,100. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval of an ordinance or other action vacating, abandoning, and Consider approval of an ordinance or other action vacating, abandoning, and closing a 1,800 square foot closing a 1,800 square foot thth portion of the North 25portion of the North 25 Street and West Polk Street Rights Street and West Polk Street Rights--ofof--Way and authorizing the City Manager to Way and authorizing the City Manager to execute a deed to the adjacent owner for the subject tract.execute a deed to the adjacent owner for the subject tract. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate ORDINANCE NO. 2016-________________ TH AN ORDINANCE VACATING, ABANDONING AND CLOSING A PORTION OF THE NORTH 25 STREET AND WEST POLK STREETRIGHTS-OF-WAY; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A DEED TO THE ADJOINING LANDOWNER, FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Porte has been requested by the record th owner of the property abutting the hereinafter described portion of the North 25 Street and West Polk Street Rights-of-Way; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Porte has determined and does hereby find, th determine, and declare that the hereinafter described portion of the North 25 Street and West Polk Street Rights-of-Way is not suitable, needed, or beneficial to the public as a public road, th street, or alley, and the closing of hereinafter described portion of the North 25 Street and West Polk Street Rights-of-Way is for the protection of the public and for the public interest and th benefit, and that the hereinafter described portion of the North 25 Street and West Polk Street Rights-of-Way should be vacated, abandoned, and permanently closed. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: Section 1. Under and by virtue of the power granted to the City of La Porte under its home rule charter and Chapter 253, Section 253.001, Texas Local Government Code, the hereinafter th described portion of the North 25 Street and West Polk Street Rights-of-Way is hereby permanently vacated, abandoned, and closed by the City of La Porte, being generally illustrated on Exhibit “A” incorporated herein, and further described to wit: BEGINNING at a point located at the northwest corner of Block 708, Town of La Porte, said point being located on the east line of the North 25th Street Right-of- Way and the south line of the West Polk Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a westerly direction, along the projected south line of the West Polk Street Right-of-Way to its intersection with the center line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way; 2 THENCE in a northerly direction along the projected center line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way to its intersection with the north line of the West Polk St. Right-of-Way; THENCE in an easterly direction, along the north line of the W of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way to its intersection with the east line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a southerly direction, along the projected east line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract. Section 2. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites, and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place, and subject of this meeting of the City Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered, and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves, and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and approval, and it is so ordered. 4 DEED WITHOUT WARRANTY NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITYNUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. Date:___________, 2016 Grantor:City of La Porte, Texas, a municipal corporation Mailing Address:604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, TX 77571 Grantee:Ybarra Restaurants, Inc., a Texas corporation Mailing Address: 7529 Bayway Drive, Baytown, Texas 77520 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) cash and other good and valuable considerations Vendor'sLien Note:$124,200.00 Further Consideration: The execution and delivery by the said Grantee of one certain amended promissory note of even date herewith in the principal sum shown above as Vendor's Lien Note, payable to the order of Grantor, bearing interest at the rate therein specified, providing for attorney's fees and acceleration of maturity at the rate and in theevents therein set forth, and payment of said note being secured by Vendor's Lien and Superior Title retained herein in favor of said Grantor, and by amended and restated Deed of Trust of even date herewith, from Grantee to CLARK T.ASKINS, Trustee, to which reference is here made for all purposes; have GRANTED, SOLD and CONVEYED, and by these presents does GRANT, SELL and CONVEY unto the said Grantee, the following described property, to-wit: Property (including any improvements): BEGINNING at a point located at the northwest corner of Block 708, Town of La Porte, said point being located on the east line of the North 25th Street Right-ofWay and the south line of the West Polk Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a westerly direction, along the projected south line of the West Polk Street Right-of-Way to its intersection with the center line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a northerly direction along the projected center line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way to its intersection with the north line of the West Polk St. Right- of-Way; THENCE in an easterly direction, along the north line of the W of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way to its intersection with the east line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way; THENCE in a southerly direction, along the projected east line of the North 25th Street Right-of-Way to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract, which was vacated, abandoned and closed by City of La Porte Ordinance No. 2016- _______passed and approved by theCity Council of the City of La Porte on the ______ day of _____________, 2016. Reservations from and Exception to Conveyance and Warranty: This conveyance is made subject to all and singular the restrictions, conditions, oil, gas, and other mineral reservations, easements, and covenants, if any, applicable to and enforceable against the above described property as reflected by the records of the county clerk of the aforesaid county. Grantor for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance, conveys to Grantee the property without express or implied warranty, and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are excluded. Attest:City of La Porte, Texas __________________________________By:_________________________________ Patrice FogartyCorby D. Alexander City SecretaryCity Manager Approved: ____________________________ Clark T.Askins Assistant City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF HARRIS § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____ day of ______________, 2016, by Corby D. Alexander, City Manager of the City of La Porte, Texas, a municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: PREPARED IN THE LAW OFFICE OF: ASKINS & ASKINS, P.C. ASKINS & ASKINS, P.C. P.O. Box 1218 P.O. Box 1218 La Porte, TX 77572-1218 La Porte, TX 77572-1218 671672673 41 698697696 60 PROPOSED CLOSING OF N. 25TH & W. POLK ST R-O-W (30' x 60' = 1,800 SQ. FT.) W POLK ST 61 707708709 Legend CITY_BLOCKS SPENCER HWY ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCEL R.C. Chuoke & Associates, Inc. Appraisers & Consultants P.O. Box 1447 Office- 281-338-9633 League City, Texas 77574 Fax- 281-338-9533 May 2, 2015 City of La Porte P.O. Box 1115 La Porte, Texas 77572 RE: Restricted Appraisal regarding the estimated Market Value of a portion of the unopened 25th Street right of way adjoining the north line of (West Main (Spencer), La Porte, Harris County, Texas. Dear Sirs: In accordance with your request, I have inspected the following described property for the purpose of estimating the Market Value following described property as of the date of this Restricted Appraisal. As per our agreement, the data and analysis is presented in an abbreviated Restricted Appraisal format and is not intended to contain the full analysis. BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Known as portion of the unopened 25th Street right of way adjoining the north line of (West Main (Spencer), between Blocks 707 and 708, La Porte, Harris County, Texas. (See site plan in addenda). I hereby certify that I have personally inspected the property described via a street inspection and that all data gathered by my investigation is from sources believed reliable and true. In preparing this Restricted Appraisal, a study of comparable sales and other related market data was performed. .....Page 2 Continued...... It should clearly be understood that this letter only constitutes only a statement of the final value and that does not presume to be the complete analysis of the subject property nor a complete appraisal format and is subject to the preparation of a detailed appraisal report. The market values in the subject neighborhood appear to vary generally from +-$2.00 PSF to over $9.00 PSF for tracts generally similar to the subject property with locations that range from primary to secondary type roadways. The area has general access public utilities. The subject site appears to be generally flat and level. The subject property is not located in the 100 year flood plain. The Highest and Best Use of the subject property is determined to be for use a street right of way or for use by adjacent property owners due to its configuration. Adjacent property uses on the north, east and west boundaries of the subject property are commercial tracts of land with frontage along West Main Street or Sens Road. The client and intended user of this appraisal is the City of La Porte only. The intended use is to estimate the current market value of the subject property of this analysis as described above for use in street abandonment procedures. There has been no transfer of the subject property noted for the past 36 months per appraisal district records. The effective date of the appraisal is March 29, 2015. The effective date of the report is May 2, 2015. The estimated exposure time is up to 24 months. After a review of the comparable sales it is my opinion the estimated unit value range of between $4.00 PSF to $8.00 PSF would be placed on the subject property with a mid-range value of $6.00 PSF being indicated for the subject property before any discounting. Therefore the unit market value of the subject tract is estimated at $6.00 PSF which is based on 100% fee simple ownership with no discounting applied. Respectfully Submitted, Chris Chuoke, President R.C. CHUOKE & ASSOCIATES , INC. AREA MAP CLP PROJECT NO. 15-25000002 PROPOSED R-O-W CLOSING 1 inch = 200 feet REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 N/AN/A Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Brian Sterling Brian Sterling Requested By:Requested By: N/AN/A Account Number:Account Number: Planning & DevelopmentPlanning & Development Department:Department: N/AN/A Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: N/AN/A Amount Requested:Amount Requested:    Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.OrdinanceOrdinance 2.Public Utility ESMT Public Utility ESMT -- Signed Signed 3.Area MapArea Map SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS The City has received a request from Whataburger to release an existing public utility easement located The City has received a request from Whataburger to release an existing public utility easement located in the abandoned east/west alley in Block 48, Town of La Porte.  The easement in question was in the abandoned east/west alley in Block 48, Town of La Porte.  The easement in question was retained by the City as part of an alley closing in Block 48, which was approved by Council in 2011.  retained by the City as part of an alley closing in Block 48, which was approved by Council in 2011.  Whataburger has coordinated with each of the CityWhataburger has coordinated with each of the City’’s franchised utility companies to remove and s franchised utility companies to remove and relocate all franchised utilities from the subject alley.  Additionally, the City maintains no public utilities relocate all franchised utilities from the subject alley.  Additionally, the City maintains no public utilities within this alley.within this alley. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action of an ordinance authorizing the release of a sixteen (16) foot wide Consider approval or other action of an ordinance authorizing the release of a sixteen (16) foot wide public utility easement from the abandoned east/west alley in Block 48, Town of La Porte to facilitate public utility easement from the abandoned east/west alley in Block 48, Town of La Porte to facilitate development of a new Whataburger restaurant at 1201 W. Main St.development of a new Whataburger restaurant at 1201 W. Main St. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate 2 EXHIBIT “A” (16’ Public UtilityEasement in Block 48, La Porte) Being a 4,256 square foottract of land situated in Block 48,La Porte, Harris County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes & bounds as follows; BEGINNINGat the southeastcorner of Lot 27, Block 48, La Porte; THENCEin an westerly direction along the southline of Lots27 through 31 and Lots 1 through 6, inclusive, to the southwest corner of Lot 6, a distance of266feet, said point being th located on the east right-of-way line of South 12Street; THENCEin a southerly direction along the eastright-of-way line th ofSouth 12Street, a distance of 16 feet tothe northwest corner of Lot 7; THENCEin an easterlydirection along the projectednorthline of Lots7 and 26, a distance of 266feetto a point for corner at the northeast corner of Lot 26, said point being located on th the west right-of-way line of South 11Street; THENCEin a northerly direction, along the west right-of-way th line of South 11Street, a distance of 16 feet, to POINT OF BEGINNING, containing a total area of4,256 square feetof land. 3 AREA MAP LOTS 1-6 LOTS 27-31 EXIST. 16' PUBLIC U.E. (FOR RELEASE BY CITY) LOTS 23-26 LOTS 7-16 LOTS 17-22 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016    Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Shelly Wolny, TreasurerShelly Wolny, Treasurer Requested By:Requested By:    Account Number:Account Number: FinanceFinance Department:Department:    Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:    Amount Requested:Amount Requested:    Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.Resolution for annual review 2016Resolution for annual review 2016 2.Investment Policy_2016Investment Policy_2016 SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS The City Council of the City of La Porte originally adopted an Investment Policy on January 13, 1992, by The City Council of the City of La Porte originally adopted an Investment Policy on January 13, 1992, by Ordinance No. 1802.  The Investment Policy governs how the City will invest the CityOrdinance No. 1802.  The Investment Policy governs how the City will invest the City’’s funds and s funds and outlines administrative and legal guidelines for the Investment Officers to follow for the preservation of outlines administrative and legal guidelines for the Investment Officers to follow for the preservation of capital.  The Public Funds Investment Act requires that a City must present the Investment Policy to capital.  The Public Funds Investment Act requires that a City must present the Investment Policy to Council annually for review or amendment.  The policy was last reviewed on October 12, 2015.Council annually for review or amendment.  The policy was last reviewed on October 12, 2015. On November 14, 2016, the Finance Department presented the Investment Policy to the Fiscal Affairs On November 14, 2016, the Finance Department presented the Investment Policy to the Fiscal Affairs Committee for review.  No changes to the actual policy are recommended at this time; however, staff is Committee for review.  No changes to the actual policy are recommended at this time; however, staff is recommending adding Cantor Fitzgerald to the list of approved brokers.recommending adding Cantor Fitzgerald to the list of approved brokers. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action regarding a Resolution reaffirming the CityConsider approval or other action regarding a Resolution reaffirming the City’’s Investment Policy. s Investment Policy. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate City of La Porte, Texas Investment Policy Adopted by the City Council Of the City of La Porte On January 13, 1992, by Ordinance No. 1802 Amended: November 1995 August 1997 City of La Porte, Texas November 2000 Michael G. Dolby, CPA February 2003 Director of Finance February 2005 October 2005 Shelley Wolny July 2009 Treasurer May 2011 October 2013 October 2014 I.POLICY It is the policy of the City of La Porte, Texas (the "City") to administer and invest its funds in a manner which will preserve the principal and maintain the liquidity through limitations and diversification while meeting the daily cash flow requirements of the City. The City will invest all available funds in conformance with legal and administrative guidelines, seeking to optimize interest earnings to the maximum extent possible. The purpose of this investment policyis to comply with all statutes governing the investment of the City’s funds,including the Public Funds Investment Act, Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code (the “ Act”), which requires the City to adopt a written investment policy regarding the investment of its funds and funds under its control. The Investment Policy addresses the methods, procedures and practices that must be exercised to ensure effective and judicious fiscal management of the City’s funds. II.SCOPE The City will strive toearn a return on funds invested at the highest investment return possible after taking in consideration the primary goals of preservation of principal and liquidity of funds invested, consistent with the policy objectives described below. This investment policy applies to the investment activities of the government of the City of La Porte, Texas. FUNDS INCLUDED The City’s funds, which are pooled together and constitute the investment portfolio, include all financialassets of all funds managed by the City, including but not limited to receipts of tax revenues, charges for services, bondproceeds, interest incomes, loans and funds received by the City where the City performs a custodial function.These funds are accounted for in the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and include: General Fund Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Funds Capital Projects Funds Enterprise Funds Internal Service Funds Investment income will be allocated to the various funds basedon their respective participation and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. III.OBJECTIVES SAFETYThe primary objective of the City's investment activity is the preservation of capital and the protection of investment principalin the overall portfolio. Each investment transaction shall seek first to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether they are from securities defaults or erosion of market value.The City will strive to minimize credit risk by limiting investments to the safest types of investments, prequalifying the financial institutions and broker/dealers with which the City conducts business, and diversify the investment portfolio so that potential losses on individual issuers will be minimized. To minimize interest rate risk, the City will ladder the portfolio and match investments with future cash requirements and invest operating funds in shorter, more liquid securities and investments. 1 LIQUIDITY The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. Liquidity shall be achieved by matching investment maturities with forecasted cash flow requirements and by investing in securities with active secondary markets.Because all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, a portion of the portfolio will be invested in shares of money market mutual funds or local government investment pools that offer same day liquidity. PUBLIC TRUSTAll participants in the investment process shall seek to act responsibly as custodians of the public trust. Investment Officials shall avoid any transaction that might impair public confidence in the City's ability to govern effectively. The governing body recognizes that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses due to market volatility are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's investment return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented. YIELD(Optimization of Interest Earnings)The City's cash management portfolio shall be designed with the objective of regularly meetingor exceeding the average rate of return on U.S. Treasury Bills at a maturity level comparable to the City’sweighted average maturity in days. The investment program shall seek to augment returns above this threshold consistent with risk limitations identified herein and prudent investment principles. INVESTMENT STRATEGYThe City maintains a commingled portfolio for investment purposes which incorporates the specific uses and the unique characteristics of the funds in the portfolio. The investment strategy has as its primary objective assurance that anticipated liabilities are matched and adequate investment liquidity provided. The City shall pursue conservative portfolio management strategy. This may be accomplished by creating a laddered maturity structure with some extension for yield enhancement.The maximum dollar weighted average maturity of 2 years or less will be calculated using the stated final maturity date of each security. IV.RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL Oversight Responsibility for the investment activity of the City of La Porte shall rest with the Fiscal Affairs Committee and the City Manager.They will designate investment officer(s), receive and review quarterly reporting, approve and provide for investment officer training, approve broker/dealers, and review and adopt the Investment Policy and Strategy at least annually. DELEGATIONManagement responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the Director of Finance, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this investment policy. Such procedures shall include explicit delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. SUBORDINATESAll persons involved in investment activities will be referred to as "Investment Officers." No person shall engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the Director of Finance. The Director of Finance shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken, and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of Subordinate Investment Officers.All investment officers,including the Director of Finance,will demonstrate competence in the execution of the city’s investments. All Investment Officers will insure compliance with the investment program with ongoing training and evaluation by management. 2 PRUDENCEInvestments shall be made with judgment and care, under prevailing circumstances, that a person of prudence, discretion and intelligencewouldexercise in the management of the person’sown affairs, not for speculation,but for investment,considering the probable safety of capital and the probable income to be derived. Investment Officers acting in accordance with written procedures and this investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and the liquidity and the sale of securities are carried out in accordance with the terms of this policy. IMDEMNIFICATIONThe Director of Finance and the Investment Officer, acting in accordance with written procedures and exercising due diligence, shall not be held personally responsible for a specific investment’s credit risk or market price changes, provided that these deviations are reported immediately and the appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. ETHICS DISCLOSURE AND CONFLICTS OF INTERESTOfficers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution and management of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and Investment Officers shall disclose to the City Manager any material interests in financial institutions that conduct business with the City of La Porte, and shall further disclose any personal financial or investment positions that could be related to the performance of the City's investment portfolio. Employees and Investment Officers shall refrain from undertaking personal investment transactions with the same individual with which business is conducted on behalf of the City of La Porte. An Investment Officer of the City of La Porte who has a personal business relationship with an organization seeking to sell an investment to the City of La Porte shall file a statement disclosing that personal business interest. An Investment Officer who is related within thesecond degree by affinity or consanguinity to an individual seeking to sell an investment to the City of La Porte shall file a statement disclosing that relationship. A statement required under subsection 2256.005(i) of the Act must be filed with the TexasEthics Commission and the governing body of the City of La Porte. TRAININGInvestment Officers shall attend 10 hours of investment training within 12 months after taking office or assuming duties, and 10 hours every succeeding two yearsthat begins on the st first day of the fiscal year, which is October 1, and consists of the two consecutive fiscal years after that date. The investments training shall be provided from an independent source approved by the Fiscal Affairs Committeeto insure the quality and capability of investment management in compliance with the Act.For the purposes of this policy, an "independent source" is defined as a professional organization, an institute of higher learning or any other sponsor other than a Business Organization with whom the City may engage in investment transactions. Training shall be in accordance with the Act and shall include education in investment controls, security risks, strategy risks, market risks, diversification of investment portfolio, and compliance with statutes governing the investment of public funds. V.REPORTING Investment reports shall be prepared quarterly and be signed and submitted by the Investment Officers, in a timely manner. These reports will be submitted to the CityManager and City Council. This report shall describe in detail the investment position of the City, disclose the market value and book value of each fund group as well as each separate investment, and state the maturity date of each security and accrued interest for the reporting period. The report shall 3 include all information as required by Section 2256.023 of the Act. It must also express compliance of the portfolio to the investment strategy contained in the City’s Investment Policy and the Act. MONITORINGThe market price of each investment shall be obtained monthly from a source such as the Wall Street Journal newspaper,the City’s custodial bank,a reputable brokerage firm or security pricing service and reported on the investment reports.Investments with minimum rating requirements will be monitored for rate changes and liquidation of such investments will be determined at such time. Monitoring credit ratings –The Investment Officer shall monitor, on no less than a monthly basis, the credit rating on all authorized investments in the portfolio based upon independent information from a nationally recognized rating agency. If any security falls below the minimum rating required by Policy, the Investment Officer shall notify the City Manager of the loss of rating, and liquidate the investment within one week. Monitoring FDIC Status for Mergers and Acquisitions –The Investment Officer shall monitor, on no less than a weekly basis, the status and ownership of all banks issuing brokered CDs owned by the City based upon information from the FDIC. If any bank has been acquired or merged with another bank in which brokered CDs are owned, the Investment Officer or Advisor shall immediately liquidate any brokered CD which places the City above the FDIC insurance level. VI.INVESTMENTS ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENTThe City intends to pursue active versus passive portfolio management philosophy. That is, securities may be sold before they mature if market conditions present an opportunity for the City to benefit from the trade. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTSThe following are authorized investments for the City andall are authorized and further defined by the Act. Only those investments listed in this section are authorized. A.Obligations, including letters of credit, of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities;direct obligations of this state or its agencies and instrumentalities;other obligations, the principal and interest of which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by, or backed by the full faith and credit of, this state or the United States or their respective agencies and instrumentalities, including obligations that are fully guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or by the explicit full faith and credit of the United States; andobligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political subdivisions of any state rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than A or its equivalent.(Section 2256.009 (a)of the Act) The following are not authorized investments under Section2256.009 (b)of the Act: obligations whose payment represents the coupon payment on the outstanding principal balance of the underlying mortgage-backed security collateral and pays not principal (Interest only bonded); obligations whose payment represents the principal stream of cash from the underlying mortgage-backed security collateral and pays no interest (Principal only bonds); 4 collateralized mortgage obligations that have a final stated maturity date of greater than10 years; and collateralized mortgage obligations, the interest rate of which is determined by an index that adjusts opposite to the changes in a market index. B.Fully collateralized certificatesof deposit issued by a depository institution or an approved broker that has its main office or branch office in Texas, selected from a list adopted by the City,andguaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund orits successor;secured by obligations authorized by this subchapter, or secured in any other manner and amount provided by law for deposits of the City.(Section 2256.010of the Act) C.FDIC insured, brokered certificates of deposit securities from a bank in any USstate, delivered versus payment to the City safekeeping agent, not to exceed one year to maturity. Before purchase, the Investment Officer must verify the FDIC status of the bank on www.fdic.govto assure thatthe bank is FDIC insured. D.AAA-rated, or an equivalent rating, no-load money market mutual fundsregistered with and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission;havinga dollar-weighted average stated maturity of 90 days or fewer; andincludes inits investment objectives the maintenance of a stable net asset value of $1 for each share.(Section 2256.014of the Act)The Fund must provide the Citywith a prospectus and other information required by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 80a-1 et seq.); The Cityis not authorized by Section 2256.014 (c)of the Actto: invest in the aggregate more than 15 percent of its monthly average fund balance, excluding bond proceeds and reserves in other funds held for debt service, in mutual funds described inthe Act(Section 2256.014); invest any portion of bond proceeds, reserves and funds held for debt service, in mutual funds described in the Act (Section 2256.014);or invest its funds or funds under its control, including bond proceeds and reserves and other funds held for debt service, in any one mutual fund described in the Act (Section 2256.014)in an amount that exceeds 10 percent of the total assets of the mutual fund. E.AAA-rated, or an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized rating service, constant dollar, investment poolsas authorized by the City Council and as further defined by the Act, which invests in eligible securities as authorized by Section 2256.016 of the Act. EXISTING INVESTMENTSThe Investment Officer is not required to liquidate investments that were authorized investments at the time of purchase. Any investments currently held that do not meet the guidelines of this policy shall be reviewed to determine the ability to liquidate. An investment that requires a minimum rating under this subchapter does not qualify as an authorized investment during the period the investment does not have the minimum rating. An entity shall take all prudent measures that are consistent with its investment policy to liquidate an investment that does not have the minimum rating. If the investment cannot be liquidated because of material adverse change in the value since the time of purchase, and holding the investment to maturity does not negatively affect disbursements or cash flow, a recommendation of holding said investment to maturity is acceptable. 5 MAXIMUM MATURITIESThe maximum stated maturity, from the date of purchase, for any individual investment may not exceed 5 years and the maximum dollar-weighted average maturity for the pooled fund group (investment portfolio) may not exceed 2 years. DIVERSIFICATIONIt is the policy of the City to diversify its investment portfolios. Assets held in the pooled investment portfolio shall be diversified to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over-concentration of assets in a specific maturity, specific issuer or specific class of securities. Diversification strategies shall be determined and revised periodically by the Fiscal Affairs Committee. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSMaximum allowable percentages of the total portfolio for investments are stated as follows: Investment TypeMaximum Limit 1.Investment Pools100% 2.Money Market Accounts10% 3.Certificates of Deposit60% 4.U.S. Government Securities80% 5.U.S. Agency Securities80% VII.SELECTION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND BROKER DEALERS SELECTION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONSDepositories shall be selected through the City's banking services procurement process, which shall include a formal request for proposal (RFP) issued every five(5) years. In selecting depositories, the services available, service costs, and creditworthiness of institutions shall be considered, and the Director of Finance shall conduct a comprehensive review of prospective depositories’credit characteristics and financial history. The depository contract will provide for collateral if balance exceeds FDIC Insurance amounts. The City shall select financial institutions from which the City may purchase certificates of deposit in accordance with the Act and this policy and will have a written depository agreement withthe selected institution, which was approved by resolution of the Bank’s Board if collateral is required.The Investment Officer shall monitor the fiscal condition of financial institutions where certificates of deposit are held. AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL BROKER/DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONSThe Investment Officer shall maintain a list of broker/dealers and financial institutions authorized to provide investment services. These may include primary dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 15C3-1 (uniform net capital rule). All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must submit: audited financial statements, proof of National Association of Security Dealers certification, and proof of state registration. Before engaging in investment transactions with a financial institutions or broker/dealers, the Investment Officershall have received, from a Qualified Representative of said firm, a signed Certification Form. (Exhibit B) This form shall attest that the individual responsible for the City's account with that firm has(1) received and reviewed the investment policy of the City; and (2) acknowledged that the business organization has implemented reasonable procedures and controls in an effort to preclude investment transactions conducted between the City and the organization that are not authorized by the City’s investment policy, except to the extent that this 6 authorization is dependent on an analysis of the makeup of the City’s entire portfolio or requires an interpretation of subjective investment standards.Investment Officersof the Citymay not acquire or otherwise obtainany authorized investment described in the investment policy from a person who has not delivered a signed Certification Form. The Fiscal Affairs Committee shall at least annually review, revise, and adopt a list of qualified broker/dealersand other financial institutions that are authorized to engage in investment transactions with the City. (Exhibit A) COMPETITIVE BIDDINGAll investment transactions must be competitively transacted and executed with broker/dealers or financial institutions that have been authorized by the City. The City will obtain at least three competitive offers. Exception: New issues will not be required to be competitively transacted as all broker/dealers would show the same price and yield. VIII.COLLATERAL COLLATERALIZATION OF PUBLIC DEPOSITSCollateralization requirements are governed by the Texas Government Code Chapter 2257 (Public Funds Collateral Act). All bank deposits, certificates of deposit, and repurchase agreements shall be secured by pledged collateral. In order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of security for all funds, the required minimum collateral level will be a market value equal to noless than 102% of the deposits.Collateral levels should be monitored andmaintained by the financial institution. Repurchase agreements shall be documented by specific agreement noting the collateral pledged in each agreementand should be monitored daily. Collateral shall be reviewed monthly to assure the market value of the securities pledged equals or exceeds the related bank balances. Collateral shall always be held in the City’s name by an independent third party with whom the City of La Porte has a current custodial agreement. Evidence of the pledged collateral shall be maintained by a written agreement. A safekeeping receipt must be supplied to the City of La Porte for any transaction involving sales/purchases/maturities of securities and/or underlying collateral, which the City of La Porte will retain. The right of collateral substitution is granted provided the substitution has prior approval of the City and is followed by the delivery of an original safekeeping receipt to the City, and replacement collateral is received prior to the release of original collateral. COLLATERAL DEFINEDThe City shall accept only the following securities as collateral: A.FDIC insurance coverage; B.United States Treasuries and Agencies; C.Obligations, including letters of credit, of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities. D.Other securities as approved by the Fiscal Affairs Committee. SUBJECT TO AUDITAll collateral shall be subject to inspection and audit by the Director of Finance or the City's independent auditors. IX.SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY SAFEKEEPING AGREEMENTAll securities owned by the City shall be held in the City’s designated third party safekeeping. The third party custodian shall be required to issue safekeeping receipts to the City listing each specific security, description, maturity, cusip number yield and/or coupon, market valueand other pertinent information. Each safekeeping receipt 7 shall clearly indicate that the instrument is held for the City of La Porte. All safekeeping arrangements shall be documented by the Investment Officer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENTAll investment transactionsshall be executedon a delivery versus paymentbasis. That is, funds shall not be wired or paid until verification has been made that the collateral was received by the Trustee. The collateral shall be held in the name of the City. The Trustee's records shall assure the notation of the City's ownership of or explicit claim on the securities. The original copy of all safekeeping receipts shall be delivered to the City. X.MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROLS TheDirector of Finance shall establish a system of internal controls, which shall be reviewed by an independent auditor. The controls shall be designed to prevent losses of public funds arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, unanticipated changes in financial markets, or imprudent actions by employees or Investment Officersof the City. Controls and managerial emphasis deemed most important that shall be employed where practical are: A.Control of collusion B.Separation of duties C.Separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping D.Custodian safekeeping receipts records management E.Avoidance of physical delivery securities F.Clear delegation of authorityto subordinate staff members G.Documentation on investment bidding events H.Written confirmation of transactionsfor investments and wire transfers I.Reconcilement and comparisons of security receipts with the investment subsidiary records J.Compliance with investment policies K.Accurate andtimely reports L.Validation of investment maturity decisions with supporting cash flow data M.Adequate training and development of Investment Officers O.Review of financial condition of all brokers, dealers and financial institutions P.Staying informed about market conditions, changes, and trends that require adjustments in investment strategies Q. Monitor credit ratings R. Monitor FDIC status for mergers and acquisitions for brokered CD’s COMPLIANCE AUDITThe City shall perform, in conjunction with its annual financial audit, a compliance audit of management controls on investments and adherence to the entity's established investment policies. The audit shall include a formal review of the quarterly investment reports by an independent auditor and the results reported to the governing body by the independent auditor. Also, the governing body shall review its investment policy and investment strategy not less than annually and adopt a written instrument by rule, order, ordinance, or resolution stating that it has reviewed the investment policy and strategy, and recorded any changes made to them. 8 Exhibit A City of La Porte Approved List of Brokers/Dealers and Investment Pools Brokers/Dealers Coastal Securities Wells Fargo Cantor Fitzgerald Amegy Bank Investment Pools TexPool LOGIC Investment Pool 9 Exhibit B TEXAS PUBLIC FUNDS INVESTMENT ACT CERTIFICATION FORM As required by Texas Government Code 2256.005 (k-l) CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS Thiscertification is executed on behalf of the City of La Porte, Texas (the Investor) and ___________________________ (the Seller) pursuant to the Public Funds Investment Act, Chapter 2256, Government Code, Texas Codes Annotated (the Act) in connection with investment transactions conducted between the Investor and Dealer. The Undersigned Qualified Representative of the Seller hereby certifies on behalf of the Seller that: 1.The Qualified Representative is duly authorized to execute this Certification on behalf of the Seller, and 2.The Qualified Representative has received and reviewed the Investment Policy furnished by the Investor, and 3.The Seller has implemented reasonable procedures and controls in an effort to preclude investment transactions conducted between the Seller and the Investor that are not authorized by the entity’s investment policy, except to the extent that this authorization is dependent on an analysis of the makeup of the entity’s entire portfolio or requires an interpretation of subjective investment standards. Qualified Representative ________________________________ Signature ________________________________ Name (Printed): ________________________________ Title: ________________________________ Date: 10 Exhibit C City of La Porte, Texas Investment Strategy Statement The City of La Porte, Texas (the "City") will strive to administer and invest its pooled funds at the highest investment return possible while always taking into account the primary goals of preservation of principal and liquidity of funds invested consistent with the City's investment policy. The City's funds, which are pooled together and constitute the investment portfolio, include all financial assets of all funds managed by the City, including but not limited to receipts of tax revenues, charges for services, bond proceeds, interest incomes, loans and funds received by the City where the City performs a custodial function. The City will never invest its funds in a security that is deemed unsuitable to the financial requirements of the City. Maturities will be staggered in a manner that meets the cash flow needs of the City. The primary investment objective is the preservation and safety of principal. Each investment transaction shall seek first to ensure that principal losses are avoided, whether they are from security defaults or erosion of market value. The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. Liquidity shall be achieved by matching investment maturities with forecasted cash flow requirements and by investing in securities with active secondary markets. The City shall always maintain a highly diversified investment portfolio in order to reduce the amount of credit and market risk exposed to the City's portfolio. After first considering safety and liquidity, the City's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of regularly exceeding the average rate of return on U.S. Treasury Bills ata maturity level comparable to the City’s weighted average maturity in days. The City shall seek to augment returns above this threshold consistent with risk limitations identified in the City's investment policy and prudent investment principles. 11 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016    Source of Funds:Source of Funds:    Requested By:Requested By:    Account Number:Account Number: AdministrationAdministration Department:Department:    Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:    Amount Requested:Amount Requested:    Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.PresentationPresentation 2.OrdinancesOrdinances SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS The Dangerous Building Inspection Board, as established by Sect. 82The Dangerous Building Inspection Board, as established by Sect. 82--472 of the City472 of the City’’s Code of s Code of Ordinances, is composed of the Deputy Building Official (Mike Collier), the Fire Chief (Mike Boaze) and Ordinances, is composed of the Deputy Building Official (Mike Collier), the Fire Chief (Mike Boaze) and the Fire Marshal (Clif Meekins).the Fire Marshal (Clif Meekins). On September 12, 2016, Council granted five property owners 90 days to complete repairs on On September 12, 2016, Council granted five property owners 90 days to complete repairs on structures located at 0 S. Lobit, 3142 Fondren, 727 S. Kansas, 202 N. Forrest, and 3313 Bayer.  Prior to structures located at 0 S. Lobit, 3142 Fondren, 727 S. Kansas, 202 N. Forrest, and 3313 Bayer.  Prior to tonight’s meeting, courtesy letters both regular mail and certified, were sent to all property owners as a s meeting, courtesy letters both regular mail and certified, were sent to all property owners as a reminder of the upcoming deadline.reminder of the upcoming deadline. The current status of each property is as follows:The current status of each property is as follows:The current status of each property is as follows:The current status of each property is as follows: 0 S. Lobit:            Negligible improvements0 S. Lobit:            Negligible improvements 3142 Fondren:    To be Demolished by owner                                             Demolition Permit issued 3142 Fondren:    To be Demolished by owner                                             Demolition Permit issued 11/11/2016 727 S. Kansas:    Anticipate completion of repairs by December 12.           Remodel Permit issued 727 S. Kansas:    Anticipate completion of repairs by December 12.           Remodel Permit issued 09/02/2016 202 N. Forrest:    Demolished by owner                                                        Demolition Permit issued 202 N. Forrest:    Demolished by owner                                                         Demolition Permit issued 11/04/2016 3313 Bayer:        Negligible improvements3313 Bayer:        Negligible improvements At this time, staff is recommending Council consider authorizing the removal of dangerous buildings At this time, staff is recommending Council consider authorizing the removal of dangerous buildings located at 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer to prevent devaluation of adjoining properties.  Should the Council located at 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer to prevent devaluation of adjoining properties.  Should the Council approve the condemnation ordinances for 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer, staff will obtain quotes for the approve the condemnation ordinances for 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer, staff will obtain quotes for the demolition.  It is estimated that each structure will cost approximately $5,000 demolition.  It is estimated that each structure will cost approximately $5,000 -- $7,000 to demolish. $7,000 to demolish. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval or other action of ordinances to proceed with removal of the dangerous buildings Consider approval or other action of ordinances to proceed with removal of the dangerous buildings located at 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer.located at 0 S. Lobit and 3313 Bayer. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate Possible Dangerous Building List 12/12/2016 Properties with Voluntary Demolition 3142 Fondren(April 2016) 3142 Fondren(Nov. 2016) Note: Property should be completely demolished by the December 12 meeting. 202 N. Forrest (April 2016) 202 N. Forrest (Nov. 2016) Property with Substantial Progress 727 S. Kansas (April 2016) 727 S. Kansas (Nov. 2016) Properties with Negligible Progress 0 S. Lobit(April 2016) 0 S. Lobit(Nov. 2016) 3313 Bayer (April 2016) 3313 Bayer (Nov. 2016) REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 Hotel/Motel FundHotel/Motel Fund Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Corby AlexanderCorby Alexander Requested By:Requested By: N/AN/A Account Number:Account Number: AdministrationAdministration Department:Department: $ 135,000$ 135,000 Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: $ 147,106.49$ 147,106.49 Amount Requested:Amount Requested:    Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.#16018 Bid Tabulation#16018 Bid Tabulation SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS During the FY 2015During the FY 2015--2016 Budget cycle Council approved funding for improvements to the Depot 2016 Budget cycle Council approved funding for improvements to the Depot Museum, operated by the local Heritage Society.  The initial project was to provide funding to construct a Museum, operated by the local Heritage Society.  The initial project was to provide funding to construct a facility to house the Societyfacility to house the Society’’s Model T car.  The project was designed and published for bid.  Bids were s Model T car.  The project was designed and published for bid.  Bids were above budget.  Staff returned to the drawing board in consultation with the Heritage Society.  The above budget.  Staff returned to the drawing board in consultation with the Heritage Society.  The Society has come to the conclusion that additional meeting/exhibit space would be more desirable than Society has come to the conclusion that additional meeting/exhibit space would be more desirable than storage space for the Model T.  Staff then worked with the architect to revise the drawing for the project.  storage space for the Model T.  Staff then worked with the architect to revise the drawing for the project.  Enclosed is the bid tab for the revised project. The low bidder is Sage Construction with a base bid of Enclosed is the bid tab for the revised project. The low bidder is Sage Construction with a base bid of $139,126.49.  The bid included two alternates.  Alternate 1 was to install gravel underneath the new $139,126.49.  The bid included two alternates.  Alternate 1 was to install gravel underneath the new construction, and alternate 2 was to install an elevated deck to connect the new structure to the exist construction, and alternate 2 was to install an elevated deck to connect the new structure to the exist construction, and alternate 2 was to install an elevated deck to connect the new structure to the exist construction, and alternate 2 was to install an elevated deck to connect the new structure to the exist facility.  Please note that the Heritage Society has agreed to participate in the cost of construction in the facility.  Please note that the Heritage Society has agreed to participate in the cost of construction in the amount of $7,900 to offset the cost of alternate 2.amount of $7,900 to offset the cost of alternate 2. Should Council wish to proceed, staff recommends moving forward with the base bid and alternate 2.Should Council wish to proceed, staff recommends moving forward with the base bid and alternate 2. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Consider approval bid award for construction of Depot Museum expansion. Consider approval bid award for construction of Depot Museum expansion. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate Sealed Bid #16018 - City of La porte Depot Expansion Bid Tabulation General Sage Commercial Aztec Remodeling Contractor Group, LLC& LandscapingServices, Inc. ItemDescription Lump SumProject as SpecifiedLump Sum$139,126.49$145,000.00$179,068.00 Alternate 1Add gravel fill and edging (A351)$9,664.00$2,000.00$2,271.00 Add extension of raised wood decking and stairs, including railings (2A100) Alternate 2$7,980.00$8,100.00$12,778.00 Bid Tabulation reflects opening information only and does not imply any basis for award. Other factors may apply. Addendum Acknowledgement No. 1NANANA No. 2YesYesYes REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Appropriation Agenda Date Requested December 12, 2016 Source of Funds: Requested By Patrice Fogarty Account Number: Department: City Secretary Amount Budgeted: Report X Resolution: Ordinance: Amount Requested: Exhibits: N/A Exhibits: Budgeted Item:YESNO SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION For many years the City of La Porte (City) and La Porte Independent School District (ISD) have conducted joint elections for officers, together with the San Jacinto College (College). The joint elections encompassed both early voting and election day voting. For the May 6, 2017, election, the College plans to join with the City and the ISD in a joint election. The ISD has utilized branch early voting in its last few elections and desires to continue. Branch early voting provides for one or more polling places in addition to the main early voting polling place for the convenience of voters. The main early voting polling place is City Hall, and the ISD desires the branch polling place to be the Instructional Technology Building (ITC Building) at 9832 Spencer Highway, which is across the parking lot from The question before Council is whether the City will participate in branch voting during the early voting period associated with the May 6, 2017, general election for officers if the City and the ISD hold a joint election. If the City utilizes the additional branch location, qualified voters who present at the ITC location will receive a full ballot reflecting ,and the . If the City does not enter into branch early voting, aqualified voter who presents to vote at the ITC Building will not receive only the ISD and the College will be on aballot at that location. If the voter wants to vote s ballot, they would need to also vote at City Hall, the main early voting polling place. However, if the voter initially presents to vote at City Hall, the voter would receive both ballots the City and the ISD/Collegeballot. Total costs would be split three ways if all three entities make use of the branch early voting polling place. Estimate for manpower at the branch location with three election clerks each day during early voting would be approximately $2,340.00, or $780 per entity. Additional necessary costs such as election forms and incidentals could drive the per entity cost to $1,000 or more for the branch location. Staff is requesting Council determine whether the City will participate in branch early voting if the City and the ISD each hold an election on the May uniform election date. Staff does not contemplate operating a branch early voting polling place if the ISD is not holding an election unless Council desires to do so. Action Required by Council: Consider approval or other action regarding the Cityin branch early voting during the May 2017 general election if the City and the ISD enter into a joint election agreement. Staff does not contemplate operating a branch early voting polling place if the ISD is not holding an election on the May uniform election date unless Council desires to do so. Approved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date Council Agenda Item December 12, 2016 10.(a) Receive report of the La Porte Development Corporation Board Councilmember Engelken *********************************************************************************** REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 N/AN/A Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Traci E. LeachTraci E. Leach Requested By:Requested By:    Account Number:Account Number: AdministrationAdministration Department:Department:    Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance:    Amount Requested:Amount Requested:    Other: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO AttachmentsAttachments : : SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS David Miles with Spherical Development would like to brief the Council on the GilleyDavid Miles with Spherical Development would like to brief the Council on the Gilley’’s development s development project. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: None. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM December 12, December 12, AppropriationAppropriation Agenda Date Requested:Agenda Date Requested: 20162016 N/AN/A Source of Funds:Source of Funds: Michael Dolby, Director of Michael Dolby, Director of N/AN/A Account Number:Account Number: Requested By:Requested By: FinanceFinance    Amount Budgeted:Amount Budgeted: FinanceFinance Department:Department: N/AN/A Amount Requested:Amount Requested: Report:Resolution:Resolution:Ordinance:Ordinance: Budgeted Item:Budgeted Item:YESYESNONO    Other: AttachmentsAttachments : : 1.Implementation Issues and TimelineImplementation Issues and Timeline 2.Reasons for upgrading to One SolutionReasons for upgrading to One Solution SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONSSUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS In FY 15, the City began a major transition to the primary software system that is utilized by every In FY 15, the City began a major transition to the primary software system that is utilized by every department and impacts critical functions such as accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, department and impacts critical functions such as accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, budgeting, code enforcement, inspections, land management, and purchasing.  The new software, budgeting, code enforcement, inspections, land management, and purchasing.  The new software, called ONE Solution, is an upgrade from the Citycalled ONE Solution, is an upgrade from the City’’s current system, Naviline.  Both versions of the s current system, Naviline.  Both versions of the software are products of a company called SunGard.software are products of a company called SunGard. As with any upgrade of this magnitude, staff expected to encounter issues that were not identified during As with any upgrade of this magnitude, staff expected to encounter issues that were not identified during the planning stage of the project plan.  However, the volume of issues and the critical nature of the the planning stage of the project plan.  However, the volume of issues and the critical nature of the issues have forced delays in the issues have forced delays in the issues have forced delays in the issues have forced delays in the ““““go livego livego livego live””””launch of the upgraded software.  Staff has been very diligent launch of the upgraded software.  Staff has been very diligent launch of the upgraded software.  Staff has been very diligent launch of the upgraded software.  Staff has been very diligent in trying to keep SunGard staff on track.  in trying to keep SunGard staff on track.  Attached are two documents that should be used as a reference for this discussion.  The first document Attached are two documents that should be used as a reference for this discussion.  The first document outlines the reasons why staff recommended moving to ONE Solution.  ONE Solution represented a outlines the reasons why staff recommended moving to ONE Solution.  ONE Solution represented a much more streamlined and efficient way to process almost every one of the core financial functions.  much more streamlined and efficient way to process almost every one of the core financial functions.  While the Naviline module is not yet at end of life, it is at the end of new development, which means that While the Naviline module is not yet at end of life, it is at the end of new development, which means that the City’s ability to incorporate new software and online services would be very limited in the future due s ability to incorporate new software and online services would be very limited in the future due to the fact that no resources are being dedicated towards new software integration and development for to the fact that no resources are being dedicated towards new software integration and development for Naviline.  This would not immediately negatively impact the City; however, staff wanted to proactively Naviline.  This would not immediately negatively impact the City; however, staff wanted to proactively address this impending address this impending ““end of developmentend of development””phase of the Naviline software and allow the continued phase of the Naviline software and allow the continued enhancement for City services. enhancement for City services. The second document outlines the various issues and delays that the project has encountered since The second document outlines the various issues and delays that the project has encountered since launching the process almost two years ago.  launching the process almost two years ago.  The City’s initial request was $442,545 to complete the upgrade.  To date, the City has paid $198,986 s initial request was $442,545 to complete the upgrade.  To date, the City has paid $198,986 dollars.  Representatives from SunGard will be available to answer any questions. Representatives from SunGard will be available to answer any questions. Action Required of Council:Action Required of Council: Receive report on ONE Solution.Receive report on ONE Solution. Approved for City Council AgendaApproved for City Council Agenda Corby D. Alexander, City ManagerCorby D. Alexander, City ManagerDateDate LƒƦƌĻƒĻƓƷğƷźƚƓ LƭƭǒĻƭ ğƓķ źƒĻƌźƓĻ Staff encountered several pitfalls at the beginning of the process (January 2015). We were given training by SunGard staff on general ledger and financials prior to ever seeing the full module working. There were constant interruptions in our training due to connectivity issues which resulted in repeated technical support calls. This pattern of constant training interruptions continued for the next six months; so , we scheduled a call with Sun Guard (July 2015); to discuss: payroll system problems preventing parallel testing, PO order format; workflows not working; accounts payable not working, cash and account receivable not working, and general ledger training. The next several months was more of the same, so staff scheduled another call with SunGard, January 25, 2016, regarding training disruptions due to technical support issues with their software. Payroll, cash receipts, accounts payable project ledgers not working, scheduling issues with trainers. The next several months (May 16) was more of the same systems not working; however, staff felt we should have a cooling off period and allow SunGard to develop modules that function. The Finance Director, along with City Manager Corby Alexander and Rene Valdez (IT Manager), met with Tom Amburgey VP Public Administration (June 1, 2016). We discussed 16.1 upgrade, cloud team configuration, web services set up and having our team fly out to Chico, California for intensive one on one training with the Sun Gard team. The trip was postponed until SunGard was able to correct its issues with the software not working. We have continued to hold weekly calls with our project manager and we have made some headway cash receipts is working, project numbers are working, most of the purchasing functions were working but we recently have taken a step back. The specific challenges for finance are listed below: Payroll Payroll has had continuous problems with the calculations. Since the beginning of the conversion process, we have not been able to complete any parallels. In August of 2016, we have started working on a bi-weekly basis with consultant Katie Lee on our calculations. These sessions have been the most productive for payroll to date, however, we still have not been able to process a payroll from start to finish. Specific items for payroll: a. Scheduling for training on the payroll module has been an issue from day one. Sun Gard has continuously set up our training on payroll weeks, even after multiple requests not to. Their response was that their trainers were already set and could not be changed. b. During the initial training for One Solution we had continuous connectivity issues, which would delay our training, sometimes up to an hour at a time. c. When uploading our payroll year to date information from Naviline to One Solution, all of the changes that we had completed were wiped out twice, and we had start over the entry process, therefore doing double work. d. Project numbers were not working with payroll. This is a very important piece that must work correctly with General Ledger. e. Premium Hour calculations are still being worked on. f. Shift differentials had to be completely set up in a different fashion, because they did not exist in One Solution. g. Imputed Income was not calculating correctly. h. Since the One Solution Upgrade which was done in July 2016, we have gone backwards with our training. It has caused multiple issues in payroll. Namely, the additional 2 digits that were added to the employee ID numbers 1 without notification. Because of this change, we could not move a file over from Executime until recently, further delaying our payroll calculations. The Upgrade dropped all of the printers, which was another setback. i. Some basic reporting (such as TMRS monthly report as one example) are not available with One Solution, and we have been notified that the set up for these reports will cost the City extra. We also had to spend a lot of time with Katie reviewing and outlining our report needs, because they do not have the reports we need for payroll. Accounts Payable Initially Accounts Payable was working with some minor issues. However, when the Upgrade was done in July 2016 it set back Accounts Payable as well. Specific items for Accounts Payable: a. No connectivity during the initial training process, which caused long stretches of inactivity during training. b. After the upgrade, the workflows did not process properly, and approvals did not flow, pending tasks were not visible, etc. These items were working previously, so this was a setback for Accounts Payable. st c. Projects were not set up during the 1 of the conversion, these are a must for Accounts Payable, and have been a continuous issue. d. We have been unable to process Accounts Payable completely since the upgrade. e. Miscellaneous Vendors have been another major issue for Accounts Payable. It is important that this feature works for Accounts Payable. Without Miscellaneous Vendors an exorbitant amount of time would be spent creating new vendors for one time use. This feature was not available in One Solution, and they are developing at this time. This is essential for Accounts Payable. Cash Receipts/Accounts Receivable The main aspect of Cash Receipts has been Web Services. Web Services is the program that will bring over cash reports from Naviline (Utility Billing), or non-Naviline software (Parks, Golf, Court) to One Solution for processing to the General Ledger through Cash Receipts. This is a VERY important piece that has never worked at all. We have been waiting for the entire conversion for this module to be developed. Specific items for Cash Receipts: a. Connectivity issues during the initial training. b. Continuously receiving errors when practicing in One Solution. c. Receipts and postings would not print. d. The City of La Porte was not notified that Click to Gov is not compatible with One Solution. Click to Gov is our current online credit card processing utility. This means we will need to completely change our providers for online credit card services. e. After the Upgrade in July of 2016, there were different errors that seemed to crop up each time we practiced, further delaying our learning of the system. Work orders had to be completed for each problem, and we waited until they were resolved. 2 f. As of 11-16-16, Accounts Receivable was tested and errors were encountered and will not create an invoice at this time. A work order will be entered today. Fixed Assets The main issue for Fixed Assets was the Uploads that would wipe out all corrections preciously done in the system. a. Posting strategies had to be completely set up in the system. Would not come over during the Uploads. b. Depreciation records would not update, and had to be manually entered into One Solution fields. c. As of to date, we have not had any training on how to actually manually enter a fixed asset item. d. Connectivity issues during the initial training process. e. Fixed Assets also did not have any reporting, and had to be set up in Cognos by Paula Bradstreet. Although we have had challenges with converting to One Solution it should be noted that finance has been able to continue to provide superior financial reporting and service to our community with our current Naviline System. IT: ‘ĻĬ {ĻƩǝźĭĻƭʹ Web Services and workflow have been the longest running, most problematic component to this project from the IT perspective. After many months of delays, the first time we were told Web Services was fixed, we test and had not been reconfigured for Web Services. After many more months of being told it was delayed or it was being built we got the notification we were ready to test again. The test was unsuccessful and they said that an ETA for when it will be working again, it is kind of hard to get specifics from our project managers on what fixing web services consists of. Additionally we have yet to complete an entire payroll successfully in OneSolution from start to finish. {ǒƓŭğƩķ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ ağƓğŭĻƒĻƓƷ Ļğƒ ǒƩƓƚǝĻƩʹ Over the span of this project we have dealt with many people from SunGard. More times often than not, the person from SunGard was either unaware that we were hosted with them, that we have been a hosted Naviline customer, or how they were supposed to access our SunGard components. ƩğźƓźƓŭ LƭƭǒĻƭʹ Almost every scheduled training had difficulties with using the application or accessing it, had issues during training there was a slow response from SunGard, sometimes taking days, sometimes hours, but we could not get priority or escalation while trainers were onsite. This held up training, eroded knowledge retention and disrupted classes. The training schedule seemed out of order as well. Advanced topics such as workflow and CDD reporting were introduced long before we had seen the system or had access to what they were training us on. For example, one Sungard staff member trained us on CDD and workflow, but he had to say relation to security. Users had trouble understanding what they were supposed to be learning. Trainers started with screens masks and moved around the system before explaini used. We had to ask them to show menu navigation so we could comprehend. It seems the trainers are too used It felt as if the trainers need to be trained on how to introduce the application to new clients. {ǒƓŭğƩķ 5ğƷğĭĻƓƷĻƩ ƦŭƩğķĻ: On top of all this, SunGard has moved our data to a new datacenter. While this is supposed to make access to the data faster and more resilient, it changed the we our users were trained to access OneSolution. We now launch a Citrix session to access OneSolution and all of the URLs we documented 3 during training have changed. We have also changed the usernames our end users log in with to be the same account they log into their computer with. While the username change should make it easier to log in and remember, we have not gotten everyone on the same page yet. We have also had many project managers, consultants, and trainers that have left, been fired or promoted to different roles, making the new people filling s history with issues. 4 Upgrade to One Solution The upgrade of the financial software to One Solution was to provide the following Reports Click, drag and drill (CD Users will be able to investigate transactions interactively from their desktop Users may view scanned documents such as invoices attached to transactions Lower learning curve, easier to use, less cumbersome reporting software Modernized reporting software, actively see data as you pull fields into your report Dashboards help turn data into actionable information Web based mobility focused application, can access from any computer in the network Accounts Payable Email entries for electronic approvals Support recurring payments Better internal control to detect theft Scan and route invoices via document capture (electronic) Replace paper form for check request with Web form. Supporting documents can be scanned and attached Use freight codes for splitting freight charges and faster data entry Automatically transfer capital purchases to fixed assets. Payroll Currently we have a process for project numbers in payroll that is very time consuming, One Solution will be able to process these without all of the manual processing. Currently we manually calculate the overtime, overtime account numbers, both of these items can be done electronically by the One Solution system. The reporting that is available to us in One Solution will save time. Currently, Naviline has very limited reporting options, which means we have to do manual spreadsheets for departmental questions, etc. We will be able to drag and drop for any type of reporting needed. We will be able to have W4s and W2s on line for the employees. Currently, we spend quite a bit of time, going to each department to distribute W2s. They will also be able to reprint W2s if they have lost theirs. Changes to payroll check deductions (for the entire city, such as dental, vision, etc.) is a much quicker process. Automatically upload Payroll ACH file to bank Paperless functionality Employee Online will allow employees to view and print previous w2s and check stubs. General Ledger and Bank Reconciliations Import electronic bank statements for reconciliation purposes Journal entries and budget adjustments will be entered by departments and then approved and update by Finance personnel Recurring journal entries can be set once to be processed monthly Њ Automatically generates the CAFR Budgeting Will be able to attach the backup electronically to the budget adjustment Work flow will allow for email notification to the division once entry completed in the system Ability to add additional number in account code-will be beneficial to expand on project numbers Reporting abilities extremely important as it will reduce manual entry (reducing keying errors) and increase efficiency (reduce time to complete reports) Purchasing Increase efficiencies and streamline processes for issuing purchase orders. Opportunity for better contract utilization and consiste and documents routed accordingly for the requisitioning and purchase order issuance processes. Use workflow to route Purchase Request based on business rules (approvals, etc.). Electronic distribution to vendors and others. Use Fixed Asset flagging to route Capital items and to take advantage of auto-creation of asset record upon receipt. Utilize Workflow to email PDF copy of Purchase Order to Vendor and Department. Increased access to data and reporting capabilities - Improved capital project close out processes available Implement decentralized online receiving. Vendors-Employees added by AP using Human Resources to Person Entity interface. Custom Business Rule to route requisitions over certain dollar amount. Set Pay Tolerance (allowable amount to overpay a Purchase Order) to 5% or 10% with a dollar amount limit. Use Freight codes for splitting freight and faster data entry. Webform replaces email requests from vendors; workflow routes to Purchasing and Finance P-card invoice file directly to A/P Use payment terms to capture cost savings Contracts Setup retainage on Purchase Orders. Mandate retainage on certain contracts. Consider retainage release for contracts on Check Request Webform. Reduce use of blankets by utilizing P Cards. Create workflow notification when contracts are ending Ћ General System wide improvements One Solution is not dependent on Java. Java has caused many of our problems over the last decade All application windows can scale to fit the entire monitor instead of the fixed size of Naviline Within each application the elements on the screen can be adjusted for the task at hand Data is easier to enter and to access within the system Search capabilities from the home page allow quick access to the applications needed Screen specific data dictionaries describe each field and what the reporting elements are for more efficient report building Most applications have been optimized to do more on one screen than Naviline could on 3 or 4 screens Human Resources Eliminate the need for dual entry in two systems ADP will not be needed once we are live in One Solution Employee portal will allow employees to make changes such as address, marital status, etc. that will notify HR to review and accept or modify employee data. Applicant Online will allow us to streamline the onboarding process. Applicants applying for poste selected for the job, automated processes will generate employee IDs and other typical time consuming tasks. Ќ Council Agenda Item Council Agenda Item December 12, 2016 December 12, 2016 11.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTSADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS •Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Tuesday, December 13, 2016 Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting, Tuesday, December 13, 2016  •Christmas Holidays, Friday, December 23, 2016 and Monday, December 26, 2016Christmas Holidays, Friday, December 23, 2016 and Monday, December 26, 2016 •New Year Holiday, Monday, January 2, 2017New Year Holiday, Monday, January 2, 2017 •City Council Meeting, Monday, January 9, 2017City Council Meeting, Monday, January 9, 2017 •City Council Meeting, Monday, January 23, 2017City Council Meeting, Monday, January 23, 2017 12.COUNCIL COMMENTSCOUNCIL COMMENTS regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of regarding matters appearing on the agenda; recognition of communitymembers, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual communitymembers, city employees, and upcoming events; inquiry of staff regarding specific factual information or existing policies information or existing policies information or existing policies information or existing policies -- Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Councilmembers Kaminski, Zemanek, Leonard, Engelken, Earp, Clausen, J. Martin, K. Martin and Mayor RigbyClausen, J. Martin, K. Martin and Mayor Rigby   13.ADJOURNADJOURN ****************************************************************** ******************************************************************