HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-15-11 Planning and ZoningCity of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
Notice is hereby given of a Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission to be
held on September 15, 2011, at 6:00 P.M. at City Hall Council Chambers, 604 West Fairmont
Parkway, La Porte, Texas, regarding the items of business according to the agenda listed below:
1. Call to order
2. Consider approval of August 18, 2011, meeting minutes.
3. Receive presentation from Pate Engineering on the Main Street Traffic Study.
Presentation Workshop
Public Input
4. La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
A. Overview of Chapter 2, Land Use and Character
• Overview presentation
• Discussion and comment
B. Preview of Chapter 3, Infrastructure and Growth Capacity (including Public Safety)
C. Next Steps
• Chapter 3, (Deliverable October 17, 2011)
• City Council (Briefing and status report October 24, 2011)
5. Administrative Reports
6. Commission Comments on matters appearing on agenda or inquiry of staff regarding specific
factual information of existing policy
7. Adjourn
A quorum of City Council members may be present and participate in discussions during this meeting; however,
no action will be taken by Council.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable
accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees, requests should be received
24 hours prior to the meetings. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that a copy of the September 15, 2011, agenda of items to be considered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board on the day of 12011.
Title:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of August 18, 2011
Members Present: Les Bird, Richard Warren, Helen LaCour, Phillip Hoot, Hal Lawler, Lou Ann
Martin, Mark Follis, and Danny Earp.
Members Absent: Doretta Finch
City Staff Present: Assistant City Manager, Traci Leach; City Planner, Masood Malik; Planning
Assistant, Shannon Green and Assistant City Attorney, Clark Askins.
1. Call to order
Meeting called to order by Chairman Hal Lawler at 6:01 p.m.
2. Consider approval of August 2, 2011, meeting minutes.
Motion by Richard Warren to approve the regular meeting minutes of August 2, 2011. Second by
Danny Earp. Motion carried.
Ayes: Les Bird, Richard Warren, Helen LaCour, Phillip Hoot, Hal Lawler, Lou Ann
Martin, Mark Follis, and Danny Earp.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
3. Open Public Hearing to receive citizen input for Special Conditional Use Permit Request
#11-91000004, which has been requested for the property described as TR 21, Nebraska
Syndicate, Johnson Hunter Survey, Abstract 35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas. Dave Beck
on behalf of B&G Crane Service, LLC., is seeking approval of a Special Conditional Use
Permit for establishing a facility to be located at 910 State Highway 146 North. Heavy
construction equipment rental and leasing is classified as a conditional use per City's Code
of Ordinances.
Masood Malik, City Planner informed the commission the applicant requested staff to postpone
the Public Hearing request.
A. Staff Presentation
There were none.
B. Proponents
There were none.
C. Opponents
There were none.
D. Proponents Rebuttal
There were none
4. Close Public Hearing.
N/A
5. Consider recommendation to City Council regarding Special Conditional Use Permit
Request #11-91000004 for proposed establishment to be located at 910 State Highway 146
North.
N/A
6. Open Public Hearing to receive citizen input regarding a grant proposed for Harris County
project year 2012 Home Investment Partnership (HOME) Program for construction of eight
(8) affordable single-family homes in the City's Northside.
Chairman Hal Lawler opened the Public Hearing at 6:05pm.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of August 18, 2011
Page 2 of 3
A. Staff Presentation
Tim Tietjens, Planning Director gave staff report. Tim Tietjens, Planning Director,
reported on the City's application for grant funding for new construction of eight (8)
affordable single-family homes in the City's Northside Neighborhood. Mr. Tietjens
described the process and spoke about the program's success to date.
B. Proponents
Charlie Perry, 127 N. 4t"Street, spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Perry noticed that
during the previous project there was difficulty in placing prospective buyers in the homes
so the homes stood vacant for long periods. He spoke about the difficulty in qualifying
eligible buyers and suggested special consideration be given in instances where a
prospective buyer is disqualified because of being just under or just over the threshold.
Mr. Perry asked City Staff to work with Harris County on possible ways to alleviate this
problem.
C. Opponents
There were none.
D. Proponents Rebuttal
There were none.
7. Close Public Hearing
Chairman Hal Lawler closed the Public Hearing at 6:28pm.
8. Discuss proposed policy regarding street construction standards for truck terminals off
authorized truck routes.
Masood Malik, City Planner gave staff's report.
The Commission previously held a workshop to review the City's official truck route map and
discuss possible additions of new truck routes along South 16t" Street north and south of
Fairmont Parkway.
Staff was directed to prepare cost estimates and furnish a cost benefit analysis for the
reconstruction of those streets either asphalt or concrete. Staff calculated the projected value of
developed and undeveloped properties along these rights -of -way and found that the benefits are
less than the annual payment towards the costs.
The Commission asked staff to draft a policy for owners/developers to build and use public street
rights -of -way for truck terminals within appropriately zoned property that does not have direct
frontage on a designated truck route.
As per draft policy, owner/developer of the truck terminal facility shall make necessary
improvements to the road surface and street will be maintained by the City if the construction
standards are in accordance with the City's Public Improvement Criteria Manual (PICM).
The Commission debated about truck terminal locations and operations and asked staff to put the
draft policy on hold until a proper definition of truck terminal is determined.
9. Administrative Reports
a. Consultants will deliver Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan update late Aug and will be
up for review at the September 15, 2011, Planning and Zoning meeting.
b. Staff is currently working with prospective consultants on the Northside Neighborhood
Plan Update. Notice to proceed will be issued soon.
c. The Texas APA conference is in Austin October 5-7, 2011, Commission members
interested in attending, should send request to Shannon Green before September 2, 2011.
10. Commission Comments on matters appearing on agenda or inquiry of staff regarding
specific factual information or existing policy
Lou Ann Martin inquired about the status of Lakes of Fairmont Greens.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of August 18, 2011
Page 3 of 3
Masood Malik informed Commission members, the builder is still doing his due diligence.
11. Adjourn
Motion by Richard Warren to adjourn the meeting, Second by Phillip Hoot. Motion Carried.
Chairman Hal Lawler adjourned the meeting at 8:00pm.
Ayes: Les Bird, Richard Warren, Helen LaCour, Phillip Hoot, Hal Lawler, Lou Ann
Martin, Mark Follis, and Danny Earp.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
Submitted by,
Shannon Green
Planning Assistant
Approved on this day of
Hal Lawler
Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission
, 2011.
CITY OF LA FORTE
OFFICE OF COUNCIL. DISTRICT 4
Tommy Moser
Councilman, District 4.
604 W Fairmont Parkway
La forte, Texas 77571
September 1, 2011
Dear Main Street Area Business Owner and Resident:
mosert@lapertetx.gov
281-470-5019
Fax: 281-470-5009
To better understand the needs of our business owners and residents, and taking into account
the traffic patterns in the Main Street area, a Main Street Traffic Study was commissioned by the
City of La Porte, and a report has been provided by Pate Engineering, which was presented to
the City Council at the August 22'6 meeting. You can find this study on the City's website by
logging on to www.lanortetx.gov. On the front page, you will find the heading CITY
SPOTLIGHT. Locate the information titled CITY OF LA PORTE MAIN STREET TRAFFIC STUDY
and click on the link.
The City is having a workshop on this item during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
at 6:00 pm, on Thursday, September 15, 2011, in the La Porte City Hall Council Chambers, at
604 W. Fairmont Parkway.
On behalf of the City Council, I urge you or your representative to attend this very important
meeting to provide your input.
If you have any other concerns or questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Tommy Moser
Councilmember, District 4
TMlpf
Enclosure
CITY OF LA FORTE
OFFICE OF COUNCIL DISTRICT 4
Tommy Moser mosert@laportetK.gov
Councilman, District 4 281-470-5019
504 W Fairmont Parkway Fax: 231470-5009
La Porte, Texas 77571
September 1, 2011
Dear Main Street Area Business Owner and Resident:
To better understand the needs of our business owners and residents, and taking into
account the traffic patterns in the Main Street area, a Main Street Traffic Study was
commissioned by the City of La Porte, and a report has been provided by Pate
Engineering, a copy of which is provided with this fetter.
The City is Raving a workshop on this item at the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting at 6:00 pm, on Thursday, September 15, 2011, in the La Porte City Hall Council
Chambers, at 604 W. Fairmont Parkway.
As your District 4 Councilmember, and on behalf of Mayor Louis Rigby, At Large -A
Councilmember John Zemanek, and At Large-B Councilmember Dottie Kaminski, we
strongly urge you or your representative to attend this very important meeting to give
your input.
In the meantime, you are being provided with the enclosed information, which was
presented to City Council at its August 22"d meeting.
If you have any other concerns or questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Tommy Moser
Councilmember, District 4
TM/pf
Enclosure
N
tf
O
J
I
ml
C=
I
a
I
a
i
I
a
T-
CHARACTER
As expi-essed in Chapter 1, Plait Context, La. Porte will continue to be
affected and shaped by significant internal and external influences, changing
conditions, a-n.d clianging priorities. This chapter and stibsequent chapters are
intended to emphasilze Bozo; the Cihq can proactively respond to the influences
and conditions throtcc,,h policy and j,econnnended prtNram-s, or-dinances, and
nive,qnient to ensure the coinninnitaj in 20 years enibodies the facture the
citizens envision — a quality, sitstainable., and higltly livable connnunity. This
chapter emphasizes the idea of "coinnainitzj character," zuhich consider-s more
than the use of land, inchiding, the. elen-mits cfsitu and building design, the
influence of adliacent sites, and use and integi-action of open space, and the
z . impacts and relationships between sites and the built and natural
environments. It as these elements that collectively determine [lie character,
quahtal appearance, and livabilitif of
the coninninity.
2.1 Introduction
The purpose of this chapter is to establish the necessary policy
guidance to enable the City to plan effectively for its future infill
Nam=
Ch. 2, Land Use and
Community
Character
A CONANAt-MIJ)" VISION 1-01' 1 A TFXA- 2010 M'DAT17
DDUAFTSIPTEM8EK2.20ll
enhancement of La Purte's appearance. To ensure the outcomes expressed
by this plan, it is important tofollow the guiding principles, visions, policies,
and action recommendations set forth; all pfwhich will aid the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council imtheir decision'making.
2.2 Focus Areas, Goals. Actions & Initiatives
Throughout the planning processa number of issues and concerns were
expressed relating to land use oompatiti|by, in0|| on the few remaining
developable tracts, redevelopment of vacant buildings or underutilized
properties, Downtown and Sylvan Beach, neighborhood protection and
revitalization, and corridor design and appearance. These discussions formed
the basis of the following focus areas, along with on analysis of existing
conditions and review of current programs, plans, and ordinances. Each
focus area contains contextual information, key planning considerations,
goals, (and their rationales), and advisable implementation actions and
initiatives. The areas uffocus are asfollows:
w Focus AreoI—Tr nshion|ogVuaQuiIt-Out Corn mwnity;
v Focus Area 2—Quality Neighborhoods and Housing;
° Focus Area 3—Enhanced Community Character; and
0 Focus Area 4—Adequate Parks, Recreation, and Open Space.
Over the 20-year planning horizon of this plan, much of the remaining
developable land in La Porte will be built out. As this occurs, the City's focus
will shift from new development on the C|Ly'u western periphery to smaller -
scale infill development, as well as redevelopment and revitalization ofthe
Cit/s existing older sites and structures. As identified during the public
participation process (including feedback from the City Council and Planning
and IomlnQ Commission), there is already areas that are in need of
redevelopment or rewiim||aabun. These areas are displayed in the Map 2.1,
Redevelopment/Rehabilitation Target Areas, and include such areas asthe
vacant car dealerships along S. 10th Street and certain residential areas like
those located in the area around Downtown and the Spenu/idkSobdivision,
among others. To reverse the disinvestment imthese areas, it will require the
City to establish and administer a pro -active and ongoing program for
redevelopment and revitalization.
Generally, redevelopment and rehabilitation programs can comprise "one or
more public actions that are undertaken to stimulate activity when the
private market is not providing sufficient capital and economic activity to
achieve the desired level of improvement, This public action usually involves
one or more measures such as direct public investment, capital
improvements, enhanced public services, technical assistance, promotion,
tax benefits, and other stimuli including planning initiatives such an
So, what is the difference between redevelopment and
rehabilitation? Typically, redevelopment istramsfommative in nature
and may be undertaken by the private sector without any active
public involvement beyond the government's traditional regulatory
role, For example, m developer could make application tndemolish
and redevelop the vacant car dealership properties along 5. 10fh
Street to develop o mixed -use neighborhood or business park In
certain instances however, public sector incentives, (e.g., decreased
regulatory barriers, streamlined permitting, reduced fees, etc.),may
also be warranted to facilitate the likelihood of private sector
reinvestment.
Rehabilitation, in contrast, is more related to an infusion of public
funds intended to facilitate the return of building and/or property
to a useful state by repair, alteration, and modification with the
purpose of preventing further blight from occurring. Qemena|k& it
can be accomplished through acquisition of real property;
demolition; or removal of certain buildings and improvements;
installation, construction, or reconstruction of streets, utilities, and
other public improvements; and rehabilitation of certain suitably
located but structurally substandard buildings. On the commercial
side, it may include establishing programs to rehabilitate aging and
underutilized retail facilities by providing financial incentives to
existing retail shopping centers for anhancememts. The program
would be retention -focused with a primary goal of rehabilitating
retail facilities, i.e., improving their aesthetic, architectural, and
functional appeal. The intent of this type of program is to attract
new retail business that would generate additional sales tax revenue
and enhance the vitality of the area. On the residential side, a rehabilitation
program could include providing grants and/or low -interest deferred,
and/or forgivable loans for building code violations, health and safety issues,
essential repairs and upgrades ofmajor component systems (e.g, electrical,
plumbing, roofing, heating), and other general improvements (e.g, exterior
finishes). It could also include public investment in an overall neighborhood
by improving streets, sidewalks and crosswalks, pedestrian lighting, parks,
drainage, etc The intent of this type of program is to ensure residents are
living in decent, safe and sanitary homes; and that both individual homes
and the neighborhood, collectively, are able to maintain or increase the
area's property values.
' American Planning Association (APx) Policy Guide on Public Redevelopment.
Wttp,ywwwf|anninJorg/pn|icy/guides/adupted/redevelupmcm.htm. April 25.
2004.
DRAFT SEPTEMBER2,2011
|mfi|| development will also p|oV a primary role during
Lhe2O- ear planning horizon since the City isbound
by industrial districts and the limits of other
municipalities. Therefore, new development and
redevelopment will likely occur imthe few remaining
vacant orunder-utilized parcels adjacent toorwithin
already developed areas. While these remaining
areas could bmdeveloped using the same policies and
regulations that shaped the last ZU years of City
growth; it is anopportune time tm re-examine how
the City facilitates and regulates development,
particularly because of an articulated interest to
increase residential rooftops and commercial retail
opportunities. A successful inUU development
program must go beyond the piecemeal
development ofindividual panels; tofocus om 6ovv
the remaining areas may be assembled and
developed into the existing community fabric, i.e.,
creating healthy mix ofuses (that add both vitality
and convenience for residents) that are designed and
built imaway toimprove compatibility while offering
additional choices in living and new business
opportunities.
Benefits of mixed use in0|U development include a
more compact form of development, which is less
consumptive on land and resources and offers
increased convenience and mobility for those who
both the needs and purchasing power of the Oty's existing and future
As discussed later in this chapter and throughout this
comprehensive plan, two ways to facilitate successful in#U
development are to adhere twthe principles of Smart Growth and
to adopt a character -based approach to zoning and land
development.
Key Planning Considerations
Key planning considerations for traosblon|mg to a bu|k-umL
community imthe coming years include:
1) Careful planning for the build -out of remaining developable
areas following Smart Growth principles. (see inset)
2) Responding to the expressed desires for 'centers' and focal
points, whether in the form of Main Street improvements or
through development of mixed -use nodes and neighborhood
centers.
3) Taking steps to make redevelop ment/revita|izatimn efforts
attractive in older areas of the community, including incentives
and potential relief from regulatory provisions geared toward
new development.
4) Emphasizing neighborhood integrity and protection as both
residential structures and streets and other local infrastructure
continue toage.
S) Stepping up efforts to revive and/or promote re -use of vacant and
obsolete retail properties.
6) Ensuring adequate standards and oversight of imfiU development on
scattered parcels.
7) Building upon strategic public investments, such as the recent
development of Five Points, revitalization of the Sylvan Beach, and the
community —wide trail system.
8) Working to reduce the leakage of retail spending just outside the
community by encouraging and providing incentives for more sit-down
restaurants and other retail -oriented opportunities that residents wish
topatronize locally.
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives are intended to address the specific issues and needs identified
during the public participation process (and outlined in Chapter %, Plan
2 Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington. Report No. 38—|nfiU
Development Strategies for shaping Livable Neighborhoods. June 199T
httu://www.mrscorg/pub|icadons/tcxtfiU.aspx.RetrievedonAugustSz,z81z.
GOAL 1:Provide additional attention and resources to promote new
|nfiUdevelopment and red evelopment/revita lization of established
areas.
Redevelopment/rehabilitation efforts require cooperative action to
encourage new and sustained private investment and to provide supporting
rehabilitation of public infrastructure. A key part of the process is
determining the strategic actions and initiatives the community sbmm|d take
to achieve its redevelopment goals and objectives. Successful
redevelopment will often require cooperation and coordination between
agencies at different levels of government, as well as non-profit community
prgamizmtions. This should include coordination of physical improvements
with social service programs that aim to enhance the health and economic
capacity ofresidents in targeted neighborhoods. There are several sizeable
undeveloped and underdeveloped parcels within the City that provide
opportunities for infi|| development where streets and utilities already exist
or may be readily extended. There are also many individual lots that may be
developed. In addition, there are several areas that warrant consideration of
redevelopment or revitalization during the 20-year horizon of this plan.
Acdomamd|nitimth/es
1) Conduct individual redevelopment orrehabilitation plans for those areas
identified on Map 1.1, Redeve6mpmmentlRehob8itadoo Target Areas.
These plans should be created in partnership with the City, land and
business owners, adjacent property owners, and other stakeholders to
determine the most appropriate courses of action to improve these
areas
Z) Solicit interest among the land and/or business mmmeo to partner in
establishing a redevelopment authority for the purpose of developing m
redevelopment or rehabilitation plan(s) and the means of financing and
implementation.
3) identify the intended future character of the redevelopment areas.
Subsequently, establish the zoning provisions necessary to achieve the
intended development outcomes.
4) Determine the appropriate zoning of in08 development tracts and
initiate rezoning as appropriate. Zoning actions should be in accordance
with the Future Land Use Plan, and cane must betaken ta ensure that
the neighborhood character is preserved and compatibility with existing
uses isobserved.
5) Review and amend the Oty's development ordinances iu identify and
resolve regulatory impediments to infi|| development, redevelopment,
and revitalization. Incorporate standards that are unique and applicable
tuthese sites.
Action and Initiatives
1) Prepare a master plan for the Greater Downtown area The
purpose of the plan is to establish a dear and collectively
supported vision and them an implementation framework to
guide reinvestment and new investment in the Greater
Downtown area of La Porte, including the areas of Main Street and
Sylvan Beach. This plan should build off the City's revitalization initiatives
in Downtown (e.g, Five Points Town Plaza, the San Jacinto off-street
trail/sidewalk, and the City/County improvements at Sylvan Beach),
identifying opportunities to bolster Downtown as an attractive and
lightly functional center o{activity based on its unique assets. The plan
should identify the appropriate land uses and the arrangement and form
ofdeve|npmen1/nedeve|opmemt along with well -planned and designed
improvements to streets and parking areas, vehicular and pedestrian
access and circulation, streetscepmtho amenities, signage, lighting, and
infrastructure upgrades. lmaddition, this master plan should:
a) Assess the constraints to redevelopment and the effective use of
Downtown properties and buildings. Such factors as |emd and
buildings ownership, traffic and pedestrian circulation, perking,
building sizes, building code issues (such as ADAaccessibl|ity), lease
rates, and other contributing factors should be addressed in the
plan.
b) Address the fringe and/or transitional areas immediately adjacent 10
identify measures tosecure their integrity.
u) Include details on the use of design elements and unifying
treatments (could include vvayfinding dgma8e), in addition to the
gateway monuments, to demarcate the boundaries of this area so
that itisdistinguished from other areas ofthe community.
2) Revise regulatory provisions in the Main Street District to ensure new
development creates amurban character. This could include:
a) Modifying the Maim Street purpose statement to include an intent of
creating human -scaled urban character environment comprised of
mixed uses.
b) Specifying front yard setback provisions asbuild-to lines, rather than
an "average of the existing structures on that side of the street on
the same side nfthe street urthe setback ofthe closest structure on
DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2, 2011
revenues.
A COMNA (IN I I Y V I � I() N FOR [A r,op,,r,F�, TFXA� 2010 U P DATF
location, another consideration is the design of neighborhoods. The areas
that were developed in the late 1960s (with the Spenwick Subdivision)
departed from the established town settlement patterns near the core ofthe
City. New housing development and redevelopment needs to reflect a
growing demand for neighborhmod-sty|e patterns that are once again,
integrated into the existing fabric ofthe community.
Key Planning Considerations
Key
planning considerations for ensuring
quality
neighborhoods and housing include:
1)
Addressing "life cycle" housing needs
2% 11%
by offering a wider range of housing
types and price ranges so that residents
can make lifestyle transitions as they
age (e.g., from "starter" housing into a
larger dwelling to accommodate a
family, then into an "empty nester"
situation, and finally into a down -sized
space and/or "assisted living" or full-
time care facility as health conditions
2)
Encouraging mixed -use, compact, and
pedestrian -oriented developments that
can serve the "node" function desired
by residents and include types of
amenities currently absent in La Porte
(e.g., walkable residential/commercial mixed use areas).
3)
Emphasizing neighborhood integrity and
protection as both housing
structures and streets and other local infrastructure continue to age.
4)
Using character -based planning and zoning
methods, which emphasize
quality, compatible development.
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives address the specific issues and needs identified during the public
participation process (and outlined imChapter 2,Plan Contewf.
GOAL 3: Protect the integrity of existing neighborhoods.
Neighborhoods are one of La Porte's greatest assets as they Xonn a
foundation for a sound quality of life. Strengthening neighborhoods through
organization, communication, coordination, and education is a key for
maintaining and improving livable neighborhood environments. Established,
stable neighborhoods must he preserved and protected from encroaching
incompatible development while new neighborhoods should bedeveloped in
accordance with Smart Growth and community character principles detailed
throughout this plan. in essence, neighborhoods that are safe, vve||-
ma|ntained' and are ofo quality, enduring character, will maintain property
�,a,lBuilt %QO5orlater
M Built 2000 to 2004
?, Built 1990 tu19g9
PilBuilt 1S8Qmu188g
�Built 1970cu1g79
�Built 196Omrprior
DRAFT SEPTEMBED'2.20l1
values and thus, asound neighborhood environment and stable residential
tax base.
The City can greatly enhance the quality oflife for its citizens by enacting
ordinances and incentives to protect and enhance the integrity of its
neighborhoods. Mechanisms to improve the quality afneighborhoods may
include ordinances focused on neighborhood conservation; provision of
improved or updated public facilities and services such as streets, sidewalks,
trails, neighborhood parks, street lighting, drainage systems, pedestrian
amenities, traffic control, neighborhood policing and fire protection;
enforcement of codes and ordinances; providing support for the creation or
the organization of qualified neighborhood organizations by providing
technical assistance with private restrictions and/or conducting special
neighborhood studies (including redevelopment and/or rehabilitation plans);
providing funds for neighborhood improvements, and, generally investing or
reinvesting inthe community's neighborhoods.
One ofthe most effective ways 10protect neighborhood integrity bthrough
the implementation of neighborhood conservation districts. As detailed later
in this chapter, the existing neighborhoods that are envisioned as remaining
stable over the 2O-yearplanning horizon are reflected onthe Future Land
Use Plan as Neighborhood Conservation (NC). Within an amended zoning
ordinance shso|& then be corresponding descriptions as to prevailing lot
sizes, setbacks, floor area, and other criteria with by -right provisions allowing
certain house or property improvements to enable (and encourage)
reinvestment. The purpose ofthese NCdistricts |stopreserve neighborhood
character and establish standards consistent with those at the time of
development sothat nonconforming situations are not created.
Actions and Initiatives
1) Identify established neighborhoods with cohesive character and
community identity and create neighborhood conservation districts to
protect and promote the existing neighborhood feel. In addition, aUmm
for reasonable improvements inthese existing neighborhoods without
cumbersome variance procedures. Include by -right standards for making
improvements to buildings to ensure that they remain in character with
the neighborhood and donot adversely impact the use and enjoyment of
neighboring properties.
2) Consider an annual registration of neighborhood, home -owner, and
tenant associations so that updated contact information can be
maintained and used to disseminate important community -wide
information (including such things as nearby development applications
or rezonimgs, capital improvement projects, and applicable ordinance
changes).
3) Consider formalizing aneighborhood-oriented planning program to:
a) Assist developers in their preparation of covenants and restrictions
for new development.
b) Enawnn private common areas and amenities are adequately
maintained imperpetuity.
c) Implement neighborhood watch programs; this may he done in
coordination with the La Porte Police Department's Police Area
Representative (PAR)program.
d) Help older communities develop neighborhood plans, which may
include elements that vxuu|d normally be required for a housing
grant submittal and could, thus, be very effective as a grant
administration tool. Such a plan vvmuUd highlight potential
development/redevelopment sites, infrastructure improvements,
increased buffering (to mitigate such things as noise from increased
truck tmfMc),links Loimportant off -site ammenities,etc.
e) Establish and facilitate an annual city-wide neighborhood, home-
owner, and tenant association meeting to gather input on how to
better coordinate efforts and develop
partnerships while seeking mutual benefit,
4) Expand and promote inc/eased awareness of the
[ity's program on traffic calming. This could include
notifying the neighborhood, home -owner, and tenant
associations about the program, increasing available
funding, and expanding the types ufcalming measures
available, e.g., speed humps, bu|h'outs, raised cross-
walks, chicanes, etc.
S) Provide technical planning support for established
neighborhoods. Such support could address issues
related to open spate preservation, street and
sidewalk improvements, traffic onutnn|, crime
prevention through environmental design (CPTED),code enforcement ur
navigating the available housing programs.
GOAL 4: Promote opportunities for neighborhood improvement and
housing stock rehabilitation of the housing stock.
The community must remain cognizant of its older housing stock as
rehabilitation and reinvestment will become increasingly important to the
integrity and vitality of neighborhoods, particularly in the older areas around
Downtown, as well as in some areas throughout the community. Comments
by residents at the public workshops indicated concerns about some of these
areas being "not well kept." GuJe enforcement, if done proactively, can do a
lot toprevent these areas from further deterioration.
Actions and Initiatives
1) Encourage redevelopment in target areas through programs that target
lots that are abandoned or have recently demolished structures so that
those lots are put back onto the market and tax rolls.
DRAFT 3EyTEMBEXl2.2011
2) Consider forming atarget-area community investment program focused
on all infrastructure improvements (e.g,s|dewa|k installation in addition
to repair, driveway culvert cleaning and replacement, alley
improvements, tee trimming, parking restrictions, shielded street
||AhLin8 or other improved pedestrian lighting, added gveemspace,
improved pub|ics1mee{scape/ landscape areas, uewsignage, etc.) within
at -risk neighborhoods. This vvnmVd be an expansion of the current
program that provides dedicated funding for sidewalk repair and
mmimLenance. The purpose of this program is to provide a dedicated
source of annual funding for use in making infrastructure improvements
and leveraging private reinvestment through rehabilitation, building
additions, and/or iofiUdevelopment.
3) Consider the use of tax abatement, reduced building permit
or utility tap fees, and other financial programs or incentives to
elicit private sector reinvestment.
4) Continue and potentially step upthe "sweep concept" in
code enforcement bytargeting a certain area fora concentration of
violations such as weeds, debris, and junk vehicles; however,
pursue alternative code enforcement methods inanendeavor 1obe
more proactive and ensure positive outcomes, Consider the use of
an advocacy program 10 aid in code compliance rather than citing
noncompliant property owners. Akey element may bethe cross -
training of enforcement advocacy off ice rs in conflict
management/resolution or the creation of useful information
packets listing sources ofhelp for homeowners who are imviolation
nfCity codes.
6) Strictly enforce repeat offenders so that chronic violations
are adequately addressed so as to protect neighboring values and
confidence.
6) Promote neighborhood pride by stimulating resident
involvement in improvement activities, including:
m) Seasonal "clean up, fix up" events;
b) "Neighborhood Pride" days focusing on beautification; and
c) Annual "amnesty pickup" days of large refuse items with the
assistance mfCity crews and volunteers.
7) Seek the participation of churches, civic organizations, schools, and
businesses in neighborhood improvement and revitalization efforts.
#) Continue the program of identifying and demolishing substandard
structures; coordinate demolition with a proactive and effective program
to provide incentives for home building onempty lots. This may include
marketing these properties on the Oty's wvebsite, streamlining the
permit approval process, and reduced permitting fees.
g) Strengthen the ability for local organizations, e.g., Sheltering Arms Senior
Services, Inc., to support m/eatherizatium and energy efficiency
improvements in existing neighborhoods. The Weatherization Assistance
Program (VV&P) is sponsored bythe Texas Department mfHousing and
Community Affairs and helps low-income persons, particularly the
elderly and persons with special needs, control their home energy costs.
Local organizations need additional support sothat more weetherbotion
improvement options are made available. The City may also actively
support these local organizations by partnering with them on grant
applications or hosting vveatherizatlon open houses or organizing
energyeM1dencymudits.
10)Continun to apply for Community Development Block Grant (CBDG)
funds, HOME Grant funds, nrother grant or loan programs to create or
rehabilitate affordable housing for low-income households.
11)Continue to coordinate with and help to promote housing assistance
programs of the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation and the
Harris County Community Development Agency.
GOAL 5:Ensure affordable and sufficient housing options in the
future.
The availability and affordability of different housing options leads to a
higher quality of life, In general, as more types and affordable housing
options are supplied, a greater number ufresidents will be able to live and
work in La Porte. Therefore, anticipating and meeting future housing
demand is essential for the City's economic development success, and
planning will enable the community to respond effectively to the needs of a
variety ofmarket segments, from young singles and newly married couples
1ularge families, empty nesters, seniors, and retirees looking todowmsize.
The City currently has anarrow range ofowner-occupied neighborhoods and
housing types with the current mix being predominantly single-family
detached residential dwellings. Indeed, as displayed in the Demographic
Snapshot in Chapter 1, La Porte has the highest percentage of one -unit
structures (84 percent), which is higher than all the comparison cities, the
county, and the state. This leaves |b1|e room for choice among housing
types. In the future, aging residents may desire to have more housing
options available, including maintenance free condominiums and additional
assisted living and continuing care facilities. In addition, units marketable to
households that are "downsizing" should be permitted and encouraged in
appropriate locations. Examples of these varied units are depicted in the
inset, which may include duplexes, patio homes, tuwnhomes, and
multiplexes. This does not mean that there is not a market for single-family
homes/ rather, it means that future development should incorporate more
housing diversity snthat existing and future residents will have sufficient
options, from large lot single-family dwellings, to residential above retail
lofts, live/work units, and attached living.
Lack ufaffordability baconcern. When there balack ofaffordable housing
options available, it increases individual and/or family distress and is
considered to have negative effects on a community's overall health. The
City recognizes the need to ensure that all of La Purte's residents enjoy
A (_ ( )k{iMUN|RylHUNF0K[6I'dR]E.TFXA� 2fflUUP1)A'1 E
access to quality and affordable housing within livable and
attractive environments. Maintaining livability asthe City transitions
toanimfiU and redevelopment focus will require creativity and a
willingness to coordinate efforts. The qualities that make La Porte
on attractive place to live are also making La Porte an expensive
place to live. Increasing housing prices creates obstacles for low-
income households and threatens to push residents to
---�—unsatisfactory housing options. The inability tmfind housing locally
-- poses a hardship for households seeking an affordable home, as
well esemployers seeking employees,
1)Encour 8e life-cyc|e housing options in new developments that
will offer alternatives to existing and future residents. New
development and redevelopment should include more than one
housing type, with ordinance provisions for increased open space
as separation and buffering and other standards to ensure
compatibility. A combination of housing options and lot sizes will
resultinadiversityofhumsingchoices—oboicesthatvvU|beusefm|
in attracting and keeping singles, younger families, and older
residents.
Z)[mosider incorporating accessory dwelling units in the zoning
ordinance, along with appropriate provisions governing their use
�
and compatibility. They are common and increasing in popularity
in many communities to accommodate elderly parents or
relatives (i.e, "granny flats"), young adult family members
wanting tolive independently but close by, orstudents inneed *f
basic, low-cost housing.
3)Adoptdesign standards for high -density residential development,
which may include provisions for building form and scale,
articulated building walls, building orientation, architectural
detailing, roof types and materials, fa�ade enhancements, and
acceptable building materials, as well as site design standards
regarding landscape surface, parking location and arrangement,
bmfferymrds,and site amenities.
4)Esia6|ish an average, rather than minimum, lot size in the
residential districts whereby lot sizes are required to very in
width, with a certain percentage being narrower and the
remaining being wider than the average. For example, the
average lot size may allow uvariability uf1Gpercent (see inset on
next page).
5)|nappropriate locations where increased open space isdesired ur
needed to preserve resource features (e.g. wetland, tree stand,
drainage channel) or to protect compatibility between adjacent
developments, allow flexible site design and |ovv impact
development options that permit alternative treatment mfutilities
and infrastructure. There can be significant
cost savings todevelopment from flexible site `
design and duster development techniques,
��^",`��
which translate into reduced lot and house aem
phcas(e.g,reduced Nnearfeet ofntreetpipe, �� . wr1 `� `'��
sidewalk; fewer street lights, firm hydrants;
reduced soormwater management needs
etc.).
6) Transition the existing Planned Unit Development
(PUD) regulations to a Planned Development (PD)
option available in certain districts in order to m|x
different housing types. This by -right option aNnvvo the
density and open space standards to be clearly defined to
reflect the intended character. A housing palette should be
utilized to dearly specify the minimum lot areas and
dimensions, setbacks, building heights, and maximum building
cuveraaefor each dwelling unit type. These new PDprovisions
would include explicit density and open space standards
together with provisions for permitted and limited uses,
housing diversity, dimensional criteria, residential and
nonresidential development standards, open space and
recreation design, subdivision layout and design, street
configurations, and bmffen/ardo and transitions thereby
allowing them as a by -right option rather than through m
discretionary approval process.
7) Maintain an Estate residential district so that those seeking
larger -lot living arrangements with a more open feel, be
accommodated within City limits. �
8) Provide a density bonus to offset smaller units or attached
housing in order to avoid significantly affecting the feasibility of
the residential development. Density bonuses are a type of
housing production program where projects are granted
additional residential density over and above the maximum limit
allowed byexisting zoning, with the condition that the additional
housing is restricted to occupancy by certain target group and
that the units remain affordable over time.
8) Continue sponsoring the Bay Area Habitat for Humanity program
as one method of increasing housing affordability within the
Focus Area 3—Enhanced Community Character
The appearance of La Porte is the single most evident glimpse of its
economic vitality, government pmum'tiveness, and civic pride. The
initial impression is formed by the quality of development, property
upkeep, condition ofpublic facilities, amount and quality ofpublic
DRAFT SEPTEMBER2,2011
spaces, and the design of roadways and other
public buildings and infrastructure. Visual appeal
reinforces the quality uflife for those who reside
in La Porte, as well as those making investment
decisions.
One ufthe ways toimprove community appearance istoadopt a"character-
based" approach to zoning and land development, which offers many
benefits (see inset) when compared tma conventional approach like that uJ
A character -based approach focuses on the
development intensity, which encompasses the
density and layout of residential development;
the scale and fumn of non-residential
development; and the amount of building and
pavement coverage (i.e., impervious coverage)
relative tmthe extent of open space and natural
vegetation or landscaping. This applies both on
individual development sites and across entire
areas. it is this combination of basic land use and
the characteristics of such use that more
accurately determines the real compatibility and
quality of development, as opposed to land use
alone. For instance, both Main Street and
Fairmont Parkway have restaurants (i.e, the
same use); however, when patronizing a restaurant along Main Street, one
encounters a more pedestrian -friendly environment with sidewalks, gridded
streets, buildings brought mostly to the street, and on -street parking. In
contrast, when patronizing a restaurant along Fairmont Parkway, one
encounters a more auto -oriented environment where there are no sidewalks
(or they are sporadic) and buildings are set back behind off-street parking
(see inset for an example of the same residential use exhibiting three
different characters).
Finally, aesthetic enhancements such as the design of buildings, landscaping
and screening, sign control, and site amenities also contribute to enhanced
community character.
Key Planning Considerations
Key planning considerations for enhancing community character include:
1) Pursuing opportunities to create unique, signature areas in the
community (particular destinations, corridors, public facilities, parks and
open space areas).
2) Enhancing first impression and "front door" appearance by focusing on
the aesthetic treatments at community entries.
3) Coordinating gateway improvements so that a consistent, highquality
appearance exists at all entry points to the City.
4) Enhancing wayfinding, not only to help residents and visitors navigate
the community and find its key destinations, but also as a unifying design
element across the City,
5) Improving the appearance of the City's primary corridors so that an
enhanced 'image of the City is created.
6) Amending the zoning ordinance to repurpose and recalibrate its districts
and standards to reflect their intended community character outcomes.
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives address specific issues and needs identified during the public
participation process ( and outlined in Chapter 1, Plan Context).
GOAL 6- Enhance the overall appearance of the built environment in
the City.
To be fully effective in achieving the community's vision for the future,
proactive efforts must be undertaken to improve the appearance of the built
environment within the City. Unfortunately, the needs often outweigh the
financial or administrative resources available to achieve the desired
outcomes. Therefore, it is recognized that there are areas of La Porte that
are more visible and, thus, may serve as a "starting point" to initiate these
enhancement efforts.
A j N1 I IN V1 � 10N1, R)R_ LA V01\0 1, 1 FXA� - 2010 U I'l )A I F
DRAFT SEPTEMD2D'2.20D
Actions and Initiatives
1) Expand the efforts started with Ordinance 1501-11 (which
was intended, partly, as a means to mitigate the visual impacts
of container yards) to require existing non -conformities' in
designated enhancement corridors to be brought into
compliance over areasonable period oftime. Similar provisions
have been adopted elsewhere in Texas where nonconforming
site conditions (e.g, parking lot landscaping and screening
outdoor storage and display, fencing, buffering, siAmm8e, etc.)
must be registered with the City and steadily brought into
compliance over eperiod ofyears.
2) Outside ofCity limits, partner with the entities in which
the City has imterUoca| agreements to determine strategies to
increase the level of screening of container yards that exist
along the [ity's entry corridors and periphery.
3> Consider the development of corridor enhancement
plans for the primary and secondary enhancement corridors
depicted in Map 2.2, Beautification. (Additional guidance can
hefound /nChapter 4,Community Mobility.
4) Enhance the appearance of properties adjacent tustreet
corridors by evaluating and improving codes and standards for
better building placement (bmild~tn, maximum vs. minimum
setbacks), design (building shape, wall articulation, entry
identification, transparency, 300 degree architecture), and
materials; improved parking lot, stneetscape and foundation
landscaping; higher quality screening of outdoor storage;
management of outdoor display; improved lighting and sign
controls; and improved buffering ufadjacent properties.
S) Expand on previous efforts to consider embellished
gateway treatments with more significant "signature"
monuments, landscaping, and lighting at the locations of
greatest visibility. Ensure high quality maintenance of these
areas, asdepicted nnMap 2.2, Beautification Plan.
6) Modify existing codes to adopt appropriate design standards
in conformance with the San Jacinto Corridor Design
Standards.
7) Continue to work with the Economic Alliance Houston Port
Region and consider code modifications and other program
support to implement the San Jacinto Historic District design
standards, including the Project Stan Initiative, which uses
industrial infrastructure and landscaping to highlight and
celebrate the area's history and historical si0nifixanue.3
C) Consider implementing a program to publicly recognize
residential and business property owners for their role toward
enhancing the visual appearance cfthe City. This could include
monthly recognition an the City's uxebsitc or other public
communication media.
B) Partner with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)
to enhance the visual appearance of the Cm/x existing and
future overpasses, as depicted on Map 2.2, Beautification
Plan.
lB)Continue seeking public/public and/or public/private
partnerships to master plan and implement site specific
enhancements throughout the City. By *my of example,
continue working with the La Porte Independent School
District (|SD) and adjacent retail center owners %o implement
the enhancements depicted in the Texas Avenue
Beautification Project Master Plan, among others.
11) Partner with TxDOTto enhance the visual appearance of the
Miller Cut Off Road, Sens Road, and SR 146 interchange areas.
These enhancements could be similar in type and quality to
the improvements already completed at the State Highway
2I5/|ndepemdmnce Parkway interchange located just outside
City limits, mudepicted on Map 2.2, Beautification Plan.
12) Create a comprehensive vvayfinding program to project a
consistent image for the entire City and to provide directional
guidance to the area's greatest assets, i.e., Maio Street and
Sylvan Beech. Partner with TxDQT to develop and obtain
approval for a VVayf|mdinASiAn Guide System Plan.
13) Evaluate program criteria and make necessary improvements
to achieve certification through the Scenic City Certification
Program. Sponsored by Scenic Texas, this certification
recognizes Texas municipalities that implement high -quality
scenic standards for public roadways and public spaces, with
the long-term goal ofimproving the image ofall cities.
' Economic Alliance Houston Port Region. San Jacinto Texas, Historic District Corridor
Standards athttp:/4mwe.ci]a-
24) Evaluate program criteria and make necessary improvements to gain
recognition in the Tree City USA Program. Sponsored bythe Arbor Day
Foundation, this program helps communities become better stewards of
their tree resources,
GOAL 7: Refocus the zoning ordinance %oemphasize the character
and form mf development lnappropriate zoning districts.
The C|4/s zoning ordinance was originally adopted in the 1980s and is based
on a conventional (Euclidean) approach to zoning —one that focuses on land
use and minimum area standards. As part of the implementation of this
Comprehensive Plan Update, it is advisable for the zoning ordinance to be
vepurposed and reca|ibratmd to place emphasis on the character of
development (without placing as much emphasis on land use). While use
should remain a secondary consideration, the density/intensity and design of
development is of much greater importance if the City is to enhance its
character.
housing type ineneighborhood mrmixed housing development,
such as a mixed use center m/traditional neighborhood development
(THD).
6) For the purposes of procedural streamlining and to better focus the
appropriate locations of uses, restrict the types and numbers of
allowable conditional uses. For those uses with performance standards,
make them a limited use whereby they are administratively permitted
subject towritten standards,
G) Amend the ordinance to include bufferyard provisions for ensuring
improved compatibility between adjacent areas of different character.
The bwfferyardn must vary according to the intensity of abutting
development, with a range of options (including combinations of buffer
width, plant density, earthen berms, and fencing) tu meet specified
standard ofopacity. This would provide adequate buggering of adjacent
uses as well exstreet corridors. The existing provisions only specify a 25
foot buffer between multi -family and single family residential
developments without any specification as to the type of density of
landscaping.
7) Establish a minimum open space ratio ([)SR) within residential
development and landscape surface ration (LSR)wbhin nonresidential
development, The ratios will vary according to the character mfthe
district. These areas will provide visual buffering and shade,
accommodate recreational amenities, and provide needed space for
stormwa1erdetentiom.
DRAFT SEPTEh1BED2.2Q11
Focus Area 4 - Adequate Parks, Recreation, and
Open Space
Parks and recreation facilities are an essential part of a healthy,
Parks
Acres
quality, and vibrant community environment. They provide the
necessary components for events outside the home and after
14th Street Park
24
Bay Oaks Park
70enMead7ows7
1,2
work and after school activities, Whether for passive or active
use, parks and recreation facilities are an important factor of
Brookglen Park
2
everyday living, active living — serving health benefits for children,
seniors, and people of all ages. The park system also enhances the
Central Park
4.6
Creekmont Park
35
community's "quality of life" factor, boosting economic
development efforts to recruit and retain a skilled workforce;
build a strong tax base to finance system expansion, facility
8.13
Ohio Street
0.93
enhancements, and maintenance; and attract retirees.
Pete Gilliam
12
Pfeiffer
1.2
It is clear that La Porte places high value on its park and
Pine Bluff
0.11
recreation system. Subsequent to the last comprehensive
Seabreeze
3.13
planning process, in 1998, the City prepared and adopted a
separate Parks and Open Space Master Plan (2002; amended
2008) and Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail Implementation Plan
(2003); both of which the City has been actively implementing in
Spenwick
0.5
Tom Brown
0.57
Woodfalls
8.3
Neighborhood Park
the over the past several years. This section of the Comprehensive
Subtotal
37.77
Plan is not intended to supplant those separate specific master
plans; rather it is intended to review those plans in terms of how
they currently fit within the overall framework of a 20-year
Par4s
Acres
planning horizon —meaning, will the full implementation of those
Fairmont Park
17.7
plans achieve the goals of creating a park, recreation, and open
space system that is high quality (safe and well maintained),
Little Cedar Bayou
34,7
convenient and accessible (to its users), diversified (in its
Lomax
10
activities), and interconnected (to the community), while trying to
Northside Park
2.7
preserve and protect La Porte's natural assets. Note that while
Northwest
25
trails are an integral part of a park and recreation system, they
Pecan Park
33
are an equally important part of the City's non -vehicular mobility
system, and as such, will be discussed in Chapter 4, Community
Community Park
123.1
Subtotal
Mobility.
Total
160.87
The City Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the
operation and maintenance of all parks and recreational facilities.
Their ultimate
goal is to "to provide and manage superior parks and
recreational
facilities, innovative programs, and services that will provide our
customers
with pleasure and enrichment."
Existing Park Inventory
The foundation for establishing an adequate park and rocmaa1inm system is
the availability and condition ofthe existing parks and recreation areas, Tn
assess the projected future need for additional land, facilities, and
improvements, it is essential to first determine the level of service provided
by the existing parks and recreation system. Subsequently, the level of
sufficiency or deficiency of the existing system can be determined to assess
the current need prior to projecting the future parks and recreation system
needs.
Currently, the Department is responsible for 20 neighborhood and
community parks (comprising almost 200 acres), two special use parks (i.e.,
Five Points Town Plaza and the Bayforest Golf Course), and eleven miles of
trails (see Table 2.1, Existing Parks and Map 2.3, Park Inventory). Overall,
the City has a total of 22 parks and recreation facilities comprised of
playgrounds and playscapes; picnic amenities; baseball, softball, soccer,
football fields; basketball and other sports courts;
bicycle/pedestrian/exercise/nature trails; a senior center; a
Special Populations Center; two bayside parks; two fishing piers; a
rodeo/open riding arena; three neighborhood pools and one Parks
sprayground/playground; and other amenities. Over the past 21 Bayside Terrace Park
years, the City has spent close to $18 million on its parks and Fairmont East
recreation system. fFairmont 7West
In addition to the parks and recreation areas owned and managed fA Shady Lan
by the City, there are school playgrounds that provide additional Shady Rive
recreation and open space that is available to residents and
visitors of the La Porte area. The City and the La Porte
Independent School District (ISD) have a cooperative agreement that allows
joint use of City and School recreations facilities. As displayed in Table 2.2,
Private Parks, there are also five park facilities and one neighborhood pool
that are owned and maintained by the homeowners' associations.
Parks and Recreation Standards
Standards provide a measure for determining the amount of parks,
recreation and open space needed to meet the current and projected future
demands of the City's citizens and visitors. Parks and recreation standards
are typically expressed in terms of acres of land dedicated for parks,
recreation and open space per unit of population, such as 0.5 acre per 1,000
persons. While general standards are useful, it is important to establish
standards that are based upon unique local considerations, such as
participation trends and projections, user characteristics, demographics,
climate, natural environment, and other considerations. Values related to
leisure and recreation are unique to each municipality; therefore, the
standards should represent the interests and desires of local parks users.
The suggested standards from the National Recreation and Parks Association
(NRPA), as modified for La Porte's unique conditions, are illustrated in Table,
2.3, NRPA Development Standards, (on next page)
A COMMUN 11 Y V1 S 10N FOR [ A PORTE -1 EXAS - 2010 U PDA I E
0.49
1.18
2.59
2.35
DRAFT SEPTEMBFR 2, 2011
A COMMUNITY VISION 1"OR L/k PORTE,TEXAS 2010UPDATE
Needs Assessment
To assess the adequacy of the existing parks and recreation supply, it is
necessary to look at existing population, the supply ufparks provided by
existing facilities including planned improvements or expansions, and relate
them to planning standards for desirable levels of service. In addition, it is
necessary to consider forecasts in future population to determine future
needs and to identify deficiencies to address the needs of the system. As
such, the park and recreation system would have to be expanded to
accommodate 2030 projected population nf49,927 peoons+ Based upon
these parameters and displayed in Table 2.4, Parks and Recreation Needs,
the City would have taadd approximately 12.16acres ofnew neighborhood
parks and 26.88 acres of new community parks to meet the needs of the
projected future population.
33.80 1 37.77 1 -3.97 1 105% 1 4993 1 37�77 1 12.16 1 75.6%
101/40 | 123.18 | '21J | 121% U 149�78 | 123.10 | 26.68 U 82.1%
^ Population projections an: based off of the Houston -Galveston Area Council (H'
G4C) 2085 Forecast Data. See Demographic Snapshot in Chapter z' Plan Context for
more information.
DRAFT S5PTG848EK2201l
Service Areas
Evaluating service areas is an effective means of identifying geographic areas
that have sufficient pork areas available, but more importantly to identify
those in need of additional parks and recreation areas and facilities.
Neighborhood parks have a service area of one -quarter (Y4) mile, while
community parks have a service area of one mile; which means that the
majority of the persons who utilize these facilities live within those
respective distances. The service areas for the [ity's parks are displayed in
Map 2.4,Park Service Areas. Since private parks also provide neighborhood -
scale park and recreation benefits to City residents, their service areas have
been included in this analysis. While school parks have not been included in
this analysis, they too could be included if the City and La Porte ISD formalize
joint use agreements and these playground and other amenities are open to
the public outside ofschool operating hours.
Park System Plan
The La Porte Perk System Man is designed to meet the requirements of the
Texas Parks and VV|N|ife Department (TPVVD) in order to become eligible for
grant reimbursement of up to 50 percent (with a maximum of$5Nl000 per
application cycle) for qualified projects. With the City being proactive in
adopting separate Parks and Open Space and Trails master plan, these
requirements have been met. Map 2.5, Panf System Plan, is intended to be
an intermediary analysis that will facilitate future discussion when those
separate master plans are updated.
As the City moves forward in expanding park acreage to meet the needs of
the future projected population, the ParkSystenn Man delineates the areas
of deficiencies vvi1h|m the City and should be one of the primary
considerations used tmidentify where future neighborhood and community
parks are located.
Key Planning Considerations
Key planning considerations for ensuring adequate parks, recreation, and
open space include:
1) AN people should have equal access to recreational areas activities,
services and facilities regardless of personal interest, age, gender,
income, cultural background, housing environment, orhandicap.
Z) Public recreation should he highly coordinated among public institutions
and private entities toavoid duplication and encourage cooperation.
3) Public recreation should incorporate public services such as education,
health and fitness, transportation, and leisure.
4} Facilities should be well -planned and coordinated to ensure adequate
adaptability tofuture needs and requirements.
5) The availability offinancial resources should be considered in all phases
of planning, acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of
spaces and facilities.
6) Public participation is critical to the eventual success of the parks and
recreation system and should, therefore, be included inall stages of the
process.
7) There should be established procedures for acquiring land for future
parks and recreation areas and facilities prior todevelopment,
8) The design of spaces and facilities should encourage the most efficient
utilization of land, accommodate other compatible City services (e.g.,
libraries, museums, etc.), be constructed inthe most sustainable, highest
quality possible, and consider the needs and desires of the intended
users,
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives address the specific issues and needs identified during the public
participation process and the above analysis.
GOAL 8: Ensure all existing and future parks and recreational
facilities are maintained to an equivalent standard of quality and
excellence.
One of the topics that were discussed during the public participation process
was related to inequalities in the quality and condition of existing parks
within the City. New parks (e.g.. Pecan Park) and improvements (e.g, the
memspnaygmownd/p|aygnoumd at Bmnokg|en Park) created a higher standard
than now exists atsome other existing parks.
Actions and Initiatives
1)
Establish aforndbed parks -to -standards program to ensure
all parks are brought up to, and maintained in, an equivalent
quality standard. This program should include a general
maintenance and repair schedule. The priority maintenance
tasks include:
a) Resurfacing, res hping,orna1gradimgunpavodsurfacesmr
parking areas.
b) Improving drainage.
c) Increasing park accessibility.
d) Increasing the amount of signagm and/or repair of
existing signage.
2)
Conduct regular risk management inspections toidentify and
schedule repairs, address safety issues, and conduct routine
maintenance and dcamimQ, and other necessary
improvements to playground and park equipment that is
funded byomadequate operating and maintenance budget.
3)
Use the National Program and Playground Safety guidelines
and/or the United States Consumer Products Safety
Commission standards in the design and replacement of playground
equipment, all surface areas, and other recreational facilities and
improvements.
4) Enhance landscape plantings and lawn maintenance inall parks.
a) Develop a program to improve the turf quality in all parks through
turf restoration and over seeding, re -grading (to address erosion and
drainage |ssmes),and improved irrigation.
b) Continue to partner with Trees for Houston to add shade trees and
shrubs in each park to improve aesthetics, create much needed
shade, and improve the overall future beauty ofthe park system.
S) Conduct an ammma| condition assessment of pork conditions. The
assessment should be considered during the budget preparation process
for the following fiscal year.
GOAL 9kContinue to increase the quality and diversity of amenities
in the existing and future parks to attract and accommodate people
of all ages (and non-traditional park users) for both active and
passive activities.
1) Focus unpark and recreation improvements asameans for
elevating neighborhood viability. Highlight the importance of clean,
safe, xve0-meiu1uined,and vibrant neighborhood parks asananchor
for strong, established neighborhoods where residents and kids use
public spaces and interact onevenings and weekends.
2) Establish policy ofmaster planning new/revitalized parks to
develop uunique design theme for each park tobroaden the types of
facilities and activities that are available across the community and
tobetter tie their identity toadjacent neighborhoods.
a) Conduct neighborhood design charretest*gather resident
input to determine unique features, types of amenities, and overall
theme. Ideas may include parks for special events, arts and culture,
heritage, eoo-tourism,oustainabi0ty,etc.
3) Prepare revitalization plans for each of the existing, well
established parks. Plans should include equipment replacement and
repair, building/structure rehabilitation, newfmatunes/activities, and
other refurbishments.
4) Evaluate opportunities to add new types ofamenities that
appeal toimter0enerationa|and non-traditional users |mexisting and
future parks, including community gardens, dog parks, climbing
walls, bike trails, Frisbee golf, rpraygnrmnds, running/walking trails,
checkerboard tables, art walks, sandboxes, among others.
5) Continue toadd shade structures 1uall existing and future
� parks. Shading should consist of combination ofp|ayscapeshade
structures, individual picnic shelters, and larger pavilions (which provide
more shade and more opportunities for socialization, among other
things).
6) Improve on -site and off -site accessibility to each park by developing a
sidewalk improvement program to repair, replace, or install new
sidewalks, crosswalks, and curb outs, in high pedestrian use
neighborhoods immediately surrounding the parks, schools, and other
community facilities.
a) Incorporate on -site handicap accessible walking trails that create
loop around the edge of each park and connect the important
amenities within the park, sothat users can utilize these trails for
walking, running, biking, roller b|odhng, pushing strollers, among
other things.
7) Continue to provide adequate funding in the annual capital and
operating budgets toenhance, improve, and maintain the existing public
parks, recreation, trails, and open space.
GOAL 10: Continue to add new park, recreation, and open space
areas to adequately accommodate the future needs of La Porte's
residents and visitors.
Action and Initiatives
1) Consider establishing an excise tax applied to nonresidential uses on e
square foot basis, which will serve tngenerate additional revenue for the
purpose mfexpanding and improving the Cit\/sparks and trails systems.
2) Concurrent with population growth, acquire an additional 12.16 acres of
neighborhood perNamd and an additional 26.68 acres of community
parkland in the areas of deficiency by the year 2030. Additional acreage
could beused to:
a)Establishing arecreation fitness center on the west side of the City.
b) Constructing anatatorium built and financed through ajoint City ba
Porte and/or Clear [reek |3D partnership (or other interested
stakeholders).
c) Facilitating greater linear linkages between the existing trail system
and all parks, schools, neighborhoods, open spaces, and other
important community amenities,
3} Continue to provide adequate funding imthe annual capital budget to
acquire and develop new park, recreation, trail, and open space areas
and improvements.
GOAL 11: Continue to offer and expand recreational and or cultural
programs that meet the interests and needs of persons of all ages
and abilities by providing programs independently and in
cooperation with partners.
DRAFT SEPTIMB2R2.201l
Action and Initiatives
l) Provide opportunities for individuals and groups (including |ow -income,
minority, disabled, elderly, and the youth at risk populations) to
participate in cultural, recreational, and educational activities that foster
better health and wellness and strengthen both body and mind.
2) Formalize through reciprocal agreements the coordination of
programming and joint use uffacilities byand between the City and the
La Porte Independent School District (iSD)' homeowner associations,
among others.
3) Continue tuoffer and/or enhance the Fun Times Parks and Recreation
Magazine.
4) Consider providing on-line registration for any camps, lessons,
workshops, mrclasses available through the City nrits program partners.
5) Join with the program partners to make application for outside funding
to support and expand The [ity's educational and recreational
programming. Seek special funding for underprivileged residents
(particularly children) who may not have access to pools for programs
that would address need for swimming lessons inthe bay.
6) Continue to expand sponsorships and investigate opportunities to
affiliate with other agencies (i.e., public/public or public/private
partnerships), special interest groups, service dubs, and the private
sector in organizing and operating special events, programs, and leagues.
7) Continue to work with youth sport associations to further develop
facilities for recreational activities including baseball, softball, basketball,
soccer, football, rugby, swimming, among others.
8) Continue to work with public and private sector groups (i.e, civic
associations, etc.) to promote the annual community activities such as
sports tournaments, festivals, outdoor concerts, fairs, and other special
events.
9) Conduct an annual meeting with the [by'y program partners and other
community organizations to discuss opportunities for the improved
coordination and provision ofservices.
Future Land Use and Character
The essence ofcomprehensive planning is a recognition that Le Porte dues
not have tuwait toreact todevelopment proposals. Rather, bcan determine
where development and redevelopment will occur and what character the
new built environment will reflect. Through active community support, this
plan will ensure that development meets certain standards and, thus,
contributes to achieving the desired community character. As a guide for
represents how and where the City will focus new development and
redevelopment over the next two decades — and beyond. The Future Land
Use Nam is an |mtogm| part of this Comprehensive Plan and represents the
most desirable land use based upon the goals and objectives stated in the
Comprehensive Plan inconsideration mfexisting uses and development and
physical characteristics of the community. The land use designations form
the basis for zoning, and thereby, the location of housing, commercial, and
industrial areas. The Future Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan (in Chapter
4,Mobility) are the two most important planning tools available tothe City,
imthe determination ofwhether a specific zoning classification conforms tn
the land use designation on the map, flexibility should be used to interpret
land use designations boundaries which are applied on a broad scale, Street
rights-a+way, lot lines, topography, and other features should be utilized in
the location ufappropriate zoning district boundary lines. Generally, zoning
district boundaries should follow near |o1 lines or alleys to preserve the
cohesiveness ofthe stneetsmapeand compatibility mfadjacent uses.
Zoning, when applied, breaks these areas into more specific classifications
with legally binding land use regulations that according tostate law must be
"in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.""The following discusses the
land use designations found inthe Future Land Use Plan.
Character Districts
Rural. This designation is for areas with large acreages (scattered
homesteads and pasture land) and very large lot developments, K may also
include clustered residential development that is offset by high percentage
of open space on the overall tract. Rural character is usually found in areas
on the fringe of the City where infrastructure (i.e., curb and gutter, sewer,
etc.) may be less intensive than other areas of the City. Rural character
typically exhibits:
w Wide open landscapes, with no sense of enclosure, and the views to the
horizon are unbroken by buildings.
* Structures are inthe background —or invisible entirely uuthey blend into
the landscape.
* Very high open space ratios and very low building coverage.
m Greater building separation providing privacy and detachment from
neighboring dwellings.
w Much greater reliance onnatural drainage systems,
w Amone pleasant environment for walking and biking, especially for off-
street 1rai|systerns.
' Texas Local Government Code Sec. 211.004 Conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Suburban Residential. This designation isfor areas that include detached
residential dwellings; planned developments (to provide other housing
types, e.Q,attached residential, with increased open space),etc. Suburban
Residential character typically exhibits:
m Ahigh degree ofopen space maintained onthe site.
* Larger lot sizes toallow for larger front yards and building setbacks.
w Greater side separation between homes.
* Less noticeable accommodation of the automobile (especially where
driveways are on the side of homes rather than occupying a portion of
the front yard space, and where garages are situated tothe side orrear
ofthe main dvve|Uog).
w |msome case, Suburban Residential can accommodate smaller lot sizes in
exchange for greater open space, with the additional open space
devoted to maintaining the Suburban character and buffering adjacent
properties.
Auto Urban Residential. This designation also includes detached residential
dwellings; attached housing types (subject to compatibility and open space
standards, e.g., duplexes, townhomes, patio homes); planned developments
(with a potential mix of housing types and varying densities, subject to
compatibility and open space standards), etc. Auto Urban Character typically
exhibits:
0 Less openness and separation between dwellings compared to Suburban
r7l
Traditional Residential. This designation
covers many of the core single- family
residential neighborhoods within East La
Porte. The prevailing lot size allows for
less openness and separation between
homes than in Suburban and Rural
residential areas. Traditional Residential
character areas typically exhibit:
° Mature tree canopies; which help
to differentiate these areas from Auto -
Urban Residential areas.
DDUAFT3EyTEMU&EB2.20l1
* Highly Qhddedstreets, oftentimes with alleys.
m Incremental increases in housing density and lot coverage; enough to
differentiate from corresponding Suburban Residential areas.
Suburban Village. This designation includes mixed use (on single sites and
within individual structures), attached residential dwellings (pns | bly
live/work units), commercial retail, office, etc Rather than linear strips,
these village centers will have much smaller building footprints and typically
cater towards neighborhood conveniences such as drug stores, professional
services, and retail users. Given the expected increases in population
constrained by the limited areas remaining for development, it is
recommended that La Porte consider facilitating the development of some
of the remaining areas as more self-contained, mimed use villages. Suburban
Village character areas typically exhibit:
* High degree oflandscape surface than found imAuto'Urban character
areas.
* Pedestrian -oriented setting and more walkable environments.
* Higher site coverage, where a m\mlmmnm two-stury structures are
encouraged.
w Reliance on on -street parking, centralized public parking, and where
feasible, structured parking.
Auto Urban Commercial. Development types include a wide range of
Urban Downtown. This character area is different from an Auto -Urban
commercial area in that the buildings are brought to the street and there is
mnorvery limited on -site parking. Buildings within this district occupy a large
percentage ofthe site, and front and side yard setbacks must bebuilt Lothe
property line in order to maintain the characteristics of e traditional
downtown. Downtown character areas typically exhibit:
= Most intensive development character imCity.
w Streets framed by buildings with zero/minimal front setbacks,
° Greatest site coverage.
• Minimum two-story structures encouraged.
e Reliance mnon-street parking, centralized public parking, and where
feasible, structured parking.
* Public/institutional uses designed of an Urban character.
Business Park. This designation is typically Suburban imcharacter and
primarily is for office, medical, and tech no uses but can also
include light industrial (including warehousing/distribution) when well
screened and in buildings with enhanced architectural design. Business
Parks are agood way 10attract new companies tothe area and could bean
attractive alternative the existing facilities available today. Business Park
character areas are typically grouped in campus style settings and typically
exhibit:
m Reduced site coverage and larger areas ofcommon open space.
* Aminimum open space ratio of2QY6'3O%,which still allows for asizable
cumulative building footprint since most such developments involve
large sites.
• Extensive landscaping ofbusiness park perimeter, and special
streetscaping and design treatments atentries, key intersections, and
internal focal points.
• Development outcomes that exceed City ordinances and development
standards (because they are often controlled by private covenants and
restrictions)
m Site operations that are conducted indoors with nooutdoor storage mr
Auto -Urban Industrial. La Porte'n has been traditionally known as an
industrial City, and assuch, there are many industrial areas located in and
around the City which exhibit an Auto -Urban character. Although, these
areas can he enhanced through landscaping and buffering standards,
master -planning viz "industrial parks," and optimal site selection. The Cit/s
existing industrial buildings are a mix of older and new brick and metal
buildings scattered throughout the City. Auto -Urban Industrial character
areas typically exhibit:
* Predominantly characterized bylarge parking and storage areas and
minimal gneenspace;although some industrial park developments may
feature more open space and landscaping, regulated sigmage,screening,
etc.
m outdoor activity and storage, which should hescreened where visible
from public ways and buffered from residential areas. It could also
include certain publicly owned uses (e.g., public works facilities, fleet
maintenance, treatment plants, etc)
Parks and Open Space. This designation is for theCity's park, recreation,
and open space areas and the trail system. Parks are formally developed
recreation areas comprised of public parks, trails, and other improved
recreational (active and passive) or cultural amenities. Open spaces are less
DKAFTSEPTEMB£(l1.20U
developed natural areas typically characterized by sensitive or unique
environmental features that may or may not be developed. Typically, public
parkland will remain in the public realm in perpetuity with future parkland
acquired to fill the gaps and support new development. Park design,
intensity of development, and planned uses/activities should match the area
character (e.g, Five Points Town Plaza should look different than Pete
Gilliam Perk).Parks and Open Space character areas typically exhibit:
w Manicured lawns, parking lots and sidewalks, playgrounds, sports courts
and sports fields, etc.
w Unimproved natural areas orimproved toprovide limited amenities, e.g,
parking, trails, bird blinds, etc.
PublicAnsdtudonaLThis designation includes the City -owned buildings and
facilities (including City Hall and the police and fire stations),axwell asother
publicly or privately -owned schools and hospitals, churches and accessory
buildings, public parking lots and structures, and other non -governmental
civic functions (e.g., Chamber of Commerce). Since these facilities occur
throughout the City, they should be designed to be compatible with the
character of the surrounding area. irrespective of which character area these
facilities are placed, they should still exhibit:
~ High quality, highly durable materials.
m Sufficient landscaping and full screening ofoutdoor storage.
* Special stneetscapingand design treatments may bewarranted incertain
areas.