HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-21-12 Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning CommissionCity of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
Notice is hereby given of a Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission to be
held on June 21, 2012, at 6:00 P.M. at City Hall Council Chambers, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La
Porte, Texas, regarding the items of business according to the agenda listed below:
1. Call to order
2. Roll Call of Members
3. Consider approval of May 17 and May 24, 2012, meetings minutes.
4. La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
A. Review and discuss draft plan Chapter 2, Land Use & Development.
B. Review of revised Future Land Use Plan.
5. Administrative Reports
6. Commission Comments on matters appearing on agenda or inquiry of staff regarding specific
factual information or existing policy
7. Adjourn
A quorum of City Council members may be present and participate in discussions during this meeting; however,
no action will be taken by Council.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of La Porte will provide for reasonable
accommodations for persons attending public meetings. To better serve attendees, requests should be received
24 hours prior to the meetings. Please contact Patrice Fogarty, City Secretary, at 281.470.5019.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that a copy of the June 21, 2012, agenda of items to be considered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board on the day of 12012.
Title:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of May 17, 2012
Members Present: Hal Lawler, Danny Earp, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Helen LaCour, Richard Warren,
Mark Follis, and Phillip Hoot.
Members Absent: Lou Ann Martin
City Staff Present: Assistant City Manager, Traci Leach; Planning Director, Tim Tietjens; City
Planner, Masood Malik; City Attorney, Knox Askins; Planning Assistant, Shannon
Green, Public Works Director, Dave Mick; Assistant Chief, Ron Parker; and
Animal Control Supervisor; Clarence Anderson.
1. Call to order
Meeting called to order by Chairman Hal Lawler at 6:OOp.m.
2. Roll Call of Members
Chairman Hal Lawler asked for a roll call of members.
Lou Ann Martin was not present.
3. Consider approval of April 19, 2012, meeting minutes.
Motion by Phillip Hoot to approve the April 19, 2012, meeting minutes with the following
corrections;
Item # 4., Paragraph # 5., After discussion, Commission Members asked staff to bring Special
Conditional Use Permit #12-910000001 back to the May 17, 2012 Planning & Zoning Meeting with all items
required by Ordinance.
Second by Helen LaCour. Motion carried.
Ayes: Hal Lawler, Danny Earp, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Helen LaCour, Richard Warren,
Mark Follis, and Phillip Hoot.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
4. Continue Public Hearing to receive public input on Special Conditional Use Permit #12-
9100001, which has been requested for the property described as 1.403 acres along Spencer
Highway, further described as Tract D, Lots 1, 2, 3 & TR 4A, Blk. 1 & Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, & TR 5,
Blk. 2, W. J. Payne Subdivision, W. M. Jones Survey, Abstract No.482, La Porte, Harris
County, Texas. The City of La Porte is seeking approval of a Special Conditional Use Permit
for building a new Animal Shelter at 10901 Spencer Highway to be located within La Porte
Municipal Airport property, which is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) district.
A. Staff Presentation
Masood Malik, City Planner, gave staff's report. The City is requesting a Special Conditional
Use Permit #12-9100001 for the construction of a new Animal Control & Adoption Facility to
be located at 10901 Spencer Highway.
B. Proponents
Dave Mick, Public Works Director, Airport Manager, and Chairman of the Airport Advisory
Board, addressed the Commission. Mr. Mick informed the Commission members the Airport
Advisory Board has not met since 2006. Mr. Mick plans to generate an active board when
the Airport Master Plan Update begins.
Reagan McPhail, Public Improvement Coordinator, addressed the Commission. Mr. McPhail
informed the Commission members the walls of the new facility will be filled with sand to act
as a sound barrier, and the fence around the property will be used for interaction during
adoptions. The overhead doors have vents to increase airflow to prevent disease. The
facility is air conditioned and is an indoor facility. No animals will be housed outside.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of May 17, 2012
Page 2 of 4
C. Opponents
Mr. Gideon Jones, of 10403 Quiet Hill spoke the against the location of the proposed Animal
Control and Adoption Facility. Mr. Jones asked Commission to consider other locations other
than the Airport. Mr. Jones asked where the funds were provided from and who was pushing
the idea. Mr. Jones stated this was poor planning and felt the airport would suffer from the
building of a new Animal Facility on the property.
Mr. Stanley Jones, of 202 Fairrington thanked the Commission for the opportunity to speak.
Mr. Jones asked the Commission to provide other options for the location of the Animal
Facility. Mr. Jones asked to know the process, for a better understanding, and requested the
Commission to notify more people. Mr. Jones questioned the City's receipt of an award of
Transparency.
Chuck Rosa, of 812 S Virginia suggested the old Parks & Wildlife building be utilized as the
new Animal Control & Adoption facility.
D. Proponents Rebuttal
Tim Tietjens, Planning Director addressed the public and the Commission. Mr. Tietjens
responded to comments from the public and the Commission.
It was noted that a referendum was not needed this was a policy matter, well within the
jurisdiction of City Council.
The general public was publicly notified on April 9, 2012, for the City Council meeting and
again on April 19, 2012, for the Planning and Zoning meeting, and will be again when Special
Conditional Use Permit 12-91000001 goes before City Council. The City holds the
transparency award with great pride. Noise concerns have been considered, the facility is
enclosed and several hundred feet away from residential. With regard to traffic concerns,
Spencer Hwy was built for long term use and has a lane availability that far exceeds the
needs at this time. The City hopes to either sell or lease the Texas Parks and Wildlife facility.
The proposed site has been approved by the Texas Department of Transportation according
to the FAA. Mr. Tietjens presented a letter at the last meeting. Drainage is not a problem at
this location. This location is the highest elevation in the city.
5. Close Public Hearing.
Chairman Hal Lawler closed the public hearing at 7:11 pm
During discussion, Commission Members voiced concern with the location of the proposed facility
and asked if City Council considered other locations.
Staff replied, Council did consider other locations, and this was the best location.
Commission Members were also concerned with potential noise disturbance.
Staff replied, the building is structurally sound with sand in the walls and the animals will be
housed indoors.
Commission Members asked Staff if the plans for the parking lot and drive were in compliance.
Commission Members asked if landscape requirements would be implemented and the dumpster
screened.
Staff replied, Landscape requirements will be implemented, which includes screening the
dumpster.
Commission Members also voiced concern with Fire truck access to the building.
Staff replied the proposed building is in compliance.
Commission Members asked when the appointment to the Airport Advisory Board had been
made.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of May 17, 2012
Page 3 of 4
Staff will follow up and report back at the next Planning & Zoning Meeting
Commission Members asked if sidewalks would be implemented.
Staff answered, during the city's Beatification Project.
Commission Members asked staff why the Land Use map and the text had a discrepancy. The
Land Use map reads "Public Use". The text reads "Airport".
Staff replied, the Land Use map supersedes the text. The text is used as guide to better
understand the map. The Commission can correct that discrepancy during the Comprehensive
Plan Update.
Commission Member Follis distributed a proposed site plan to better utilize the parking. This
would increase the cost of the budget from $10,000 to $15,000. Mr. Tietjens explained the City is
trying to be cost effective.
Commission Members voiced concern with the notification to affected citizens and requested new
and creative ways to send notification.
Staff answered, notification for public hearings are processed in accordance with City Ordinance
requirements.
Commission Members stated transparency is not an issue and staff does notify citizens of
meetings. City Council also talks to citizens. Les Bird informed the Commission, Fairmont Park
Association was informed about Special Conditional Use Permit 12-91000001.
Motion by Phillip Hoot to send a letter to City Council, upon approval of Special Conditional Use
Permit 12-91000001, voicing concerns raised during the public hearing about the location. Second
by Richard Warren. The motion carried.
Ayes: Hal Lawler, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Mark Follis, Helen LaCour, Danny Earp,
Richard Warren, and Phillip Hoot.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
Motion by Les Bird to recommend approval of Special Conditional Use Permit 12-9100001, as
written. Second by Doretta Finch.
Motion by Phillip Hoot to retain detention on site.
Philip Hoot withdrew the motion.
Motion by Phillip Hoot to require all detention to be retained on site with no credits. Second by
Danny Earp. Motion Carried.
Ayes: Danny Earp, Doretta Finch, Helen LaCour, Richard Warren, and Phillip Hoot.
Nays: Les Bird & Hal Lawler.
Abstain: Mark Follis
Motion to approve Special Conditional Use Permit 12-9100001 Carried.
Ayes: Hal Lawler, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Mark Follis, and Phillip Hoot.
Nays: Richard Warren and Danny Earp.
Abstain: Helen LaCour
6. Administrative Reports
Masood Malik reminded Commission members of a Special Called Planning & Zoning meeting
Thursday, May 24, 2012.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of May 17, 2012
Page 4 of 4
7. Commission Comments on matters appearing on agenda or inquiry of staff regarding
specific factual information of existing policy.
Commission members asked staff to consider new avenues to better inform the citizens of La Porte
of Public Hearings.
8. Adjourn
Motion to adjourn by Richard Warren. Second by Helen LaCour. The motion carried. The
meeting adjourned at 7:54p.m.
Ayes: Hal Lawler, Danny Earp, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Helen LaCour, Richard Warren,
Mark Follis, and Phillip Hoot.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
Submitted by,
Shannon Green
Planning Assistant
Approved on this day of , 2012.
Hal Lawler
Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of May 24, 2012
Members Present: Hal Lawler, Danny Earp, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Helen LaCour, Richard Warren,
Mark Follis, and Phillip Hoot.
Members Absent: Lou Ann Martin
City Staff Present: Assistant City Manager, Traci Leach; Planning Director, Tim Tietjens; City
Planner, Masood Malik; City Attorney, Clark Askins; and Planning Assistant,
Shannon Green.
1. Call to order
Meeting called to order by Chairman Hal Lawler at 6:03 p.m.
2. Roll Call of Members
Chairman Hal Lawler asked for a roll call of members.
Lou Ann Martin was not present.
3. Consider approval of April 25, 2012, meeting minutes.
Motion by Phillip Hoot to approve the April 25, 2012, meeting minutes. Second by Richard
Warren. Motion carried.
Ayes: Hal Lawler, Danny Earp, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Helen LaCour, Richard Warren,
Mark Follis, and Phillip Hoot.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
4. La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
A. Review and discuss draft plan Chapters 2 and 6.
City Planner Masood Malik addressed the Commission. Mr. Mailk announced
Kendig Keast consultants would be presenting the Land Use Map and discussing
changes. Mr. Malik informed the Commission due to time constraints, Kendig
Keast would like to move forward to item B, review of revised Future Land Use
Map and add item A to a future Planning & Zoning Agenda.
B. Review of revised Future Land Use Plan.
Kendig Keast presented the Commission with a proposed Future Land Use Map.
Commission Members and staff worked as a group to review and make changes.
C. Identification of changes or revisions
Commission Members discussed in length the proposed plans and made
changes. The Final Future Land Use map will be presented to the Planning &
Zoning Commission at the June 21, 2012, meeting. Kendig Keast consultants
asked Commission Members return comments by June 8tn
Chairman Hal Lawler dismissed himself from the meeting at 8:00pm. Vice Chairman Danny Earp
chaired the meeting.
5. Administrative Reports
Masood Malik reported on a discussion on item from the previous meeting. Research shows there
are only two bird sanctuary's in Southeast Texas: Armand Bayou and North Deer Island. La Porte is
not a bird sanctuary.
6. Commission Comments on matters appearing on agenda or inquiry of staff regarding
specific factual information of existing policy.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of May 24, 2012
Page 2 of 2
7. Adjourn
Motion to adjourn by Richard Warren. Second by Helen LaCour. The motion carried. The
meeting adjourned at 9:11 p.m.
Ayes: Hal Lawler, Danny Earp, Doretta Finch, Les Bird, Helen LaCour, Richard Warren,
Mark Follis, and Phillip Hoot.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
Submitted by,
Shannon Green
Planning Assistant
Approved on this day of , 2012.
Hal Lawler
Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission
Frs expressed in Chapter 1, Plan Context, La Porte will continue to be affected
and shaped by significant internal and external influences, changing
conditions, and changing priorities. This chapter and subsequent chapters are
intended to emphasize how the City can proactively respond to the influences
and conditions through policy and recommended programs, ordinances, and
investment to ensure the community in 20 years embodies the future the
citizens envision — a quality, sustainable, and highly livable community. This
chapter also introduces the concept of e =phaoizcs the idea "community
character," which considers more than the use of land, including the elements
of site and building design, the influence of adjacent sites, and use and
integration of open space, and the impacts and relationships between sites and
the built and natural environments. It emphasizes that the City could
consider the transition of community_character at some appropriate time in
the future . �# r !-ln..nrn na �a�..n�a �-.� #4aank. nna�nn�-a �n1�r .. r��.#-�zr.+naa n the naawu.�#.2r._
y
u a, c�u
ver�ix:�..ccrru���ti>�ccv�ccei�..es�...er�ic:��cv-rrer-re�vr.�cez��
2.1 Introduction 200
The purpose of this chapter is to establish the necessary policy[Ch.
4, Land Use
guidance to enable the City to plan effectively for its future infill 7, Parks and
development, redevelopment and revitalization, and charactereation
enhancement while respecting the existing land use pattern. 9, Residential
Sound planning is essential to ensure the community iselopment
prepared for anticipated (and needed) infill development, can10, Beautification
serve it adequately with public services, and can manage its12, Redevelopment
impacts to maintain compatibility of land uses and preserve
20121 Update
Ch. 2, Land Use and
Co m-r-,u.n.yty..
Chfaractcf-Development
and enhance community character. Along with the background, goals, and
strategies in this chapter, the Future Land Use Plan visually depicts the City's
policies, particularly its priorities for well -planned infill development,
protection of neighborhood integrity, and enhancement of La Porte's
appearance. To ensure the outcomes expressed by this plan, it is important
to follow the guiding principles, visions, policies, and action
recommendations set forth; all of which will aid the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council in their decision -making.
2.2 Focus Areas, Goals, Actions & Initiatives
Throughout the planning process, a number of issues and concerns were
expressed relating to land use compatibility, infill on the few remaining
developable tracts, redevelopment of vacant buildings or underutilized
properties, Downtown and Sylvan Beach, neighborhood protection and
revitalization, and corridor design and appearance. These discussions formed
the basis of the following focus areas, along with an analysis of existing
conditions and review of current programs, plans, and ordinances. Each
focus area contains contextual information, key planning considerations,
goals, (and their rationales), and advisable implementation actions and
initiatives. The areas of focus are as follows:
• Focus Area 1— Transitioning to a Built -Out Community;
• Focus Area 2 — Quality Neighborhoods and Housing;
• Focus Area 3 — Enhanced Community Character; and
• Focus Area 4 — Adequate Parks, Recreation, and Open Space.
Focus Area 1- Transitioning to a Built -Out Community
Over the 20-year planning horizon of this plan, much of the remaining
developable land in La Porte will be built out. As this occurs, the City's focus
will shift from new development on the City's western periphery to smaller -
scale infill development, as well as redevelopment and revitalization of the
City's existing older sites and structures. As identified during the public
participation process (including feedback from the City Council and Planning
and Zoning Commission), there are already areas that are in need of
redve!opment or revitalization. These areas are displayed in the Map 2.1,
n T^r^,atRevitalizationAreas, and include such
areas as the vacant car dealerships along State Highway..146 South Frontage
Roads. 10th Street and certain residential areas like those located in the area
around Downtown and the Spenwick Subdivision, among others. To reverse
the disinvestment in these areas, it will require the City to establish and
administer a pro -active and ongoing program for ... ... umd
revitalization.
Generally, "edropr"ti" ti "ram ationrevlta Izatlon programs can
comprise "one or more public actions that are undertaken to stimulate
activity when the private market is not providing sufficient capital and
economic activity to achieve the desired level of improvement. This public
action usually involves one or more measures such as direct public
investment, capital improvements, enhanced public services, technical
assistance, promotion, tax benefits, and other stimuli including
planning initiatives such us rezo^i^g.i1
So, what is the difference between redevelopment and rehabilitation?
Typically, redevelopment is transformative in nature and may be
undertaken by the private sector without any active public
involvement beyond the government's traditional regulatory role. For
example, a developer could make application to demolish and
redevelop the vacant car dealership properties along State Highway
146 South Frontage RoadS. 10'a, Street to develop a mixed -use
to;gkk^r"^ 4 "'development...or business park. In certain instances
'� Y4_:1 sYvv.rrrresys'u ..
however, public sector incentives, (e.g., decreased regulatory barriers,
streamlined permitting, reduced fees, etc.), may also be warranted to
facilitate the likelihood of private sector reinvestment.
'YDYe Yib f,1 '__.,Revi.tal i.zati.on, in contrast, is more related to an infusion
of public funds intended to facilitate the return of a building and/or
property to a useful state by repair, alteration, and modification with
the purpose of preventing further blight from occurring. Generally, it
can be accomplished through acquisition of real property; demolition; A -
or removal of certain buildings and improvements; installation,
construction, or reconstruction of streets, utilities, and other public
improvements; and rehabilitation of certain suitably located but m
structurally substandard buildings. On the commercial side, it may
include establishing programs to rehabilitate aging and underutilized ® -
retail facilities by providing financial incentives to existing retail
shopping centers for enhancements. The program .^ o—wie' could be
retention -focused with a primary goal of rehabilitating retail facilities,
i.e., improving their aesthetic, architectural, and functional appeal. The
intent of this type of program is to attract new retail business that
would generate additional sales tax revenue and enhance the vitality of the
area. On the residential side, a revitalization-eha'bilit.,** program could
include providing grants and/or low -interest, deferred, and/or forgivable
loans for building code violations, health and safety issues, essential repairs
and upgrades of major component systems (e.g., electrical, plumbing,
roofing, heating), and other general improvements (e.g., exterior finishes). It
could also include public investment in an overall neighborhood by
improving streets, sidewalks and crosswalks, pedestrian lighting, parks,
1 American Planning Association (APA) Policy Guide on Public Redevelopment.
http://www.planning.org/policy/guides/adopted/redevelopment.htm. April 25,
2004.
drainage, etc. The intent of this type of program is
to ensure residents are living in decent, safe and
sanitary homes; and that both individual homes and
the neighborhood, collectively, are able to maintain
or increase the area's property values.
Infill development will also play a primary role
during the 20-year planning horizon since the City is
bound by industrial districts and the limits of other
municipalities. Therefore, new development and
redevelopment will likely occur in the few remaining
vacant or under-utilized parcels adjacent to or
within already developed areas. While these
remaining areas could be developed using the same
policies and regulations that shaped the last 20
years of City growth; it is an opportune time to re-
examine how the City facilitates and regulates
development, particularly because of an articulated
interest to increase residential rooftops and
commercial retail opportunities. A successful infill
development program must go beyond the
piecemeal development of individual parcels; to
focus on how the remaining areas may be
assembled and developed into the existing
community fabric, i.e., creating a healthy mix of uses
(that add both vitality and convenience for
residents) that are designed and built in a way to
improve compatibility while offering additional
choices in living and new business opportunities.
Benefits of mixed -use infill development include a
more compact form of development, which is less
consumptive on land and resources and offers
increased convenience and mobility for those who
cannot or prefer not to drive (e.g., the elderly,
youth, or low income residents who lack a car). Infill
development also has a positive impact on the City's
budget as vacant properties are added to the tax
rolls, less infrastructure is required, and existing
facility operation and maintenance costs are able to
be spread across more residents and commercial
businesses (which is a benefit for individual
taxpayers, too). In addition, as discussed later in this
chapter, infill development provides the City an
opportunity to increase the supply of housing types
available within the City. This remaining housing
supply will have to be developed in a way that meets both the needs and
purchasing power of the City's existing and future residents!
As discussed later in this chapter and throughout this comprehensive
plan, two ways to facilitate successful infill development are to adhere
to the principles of Smart Growth and to consider adopt a character -
based approach to zoning and land development.
Key Planning Considerations
Key planning considerations for transitioning to a built -out community
in the coming years include:
1) Careful planning for the build -out of remaining developable areas
following Smart Growth principles. (see inset)
2) Responding to the expressed desires for 'centers' and focal points,
whether in the form of Main Street improvements or through
development of mixed -use nodes and neighborhood centers.
3) Taking steps to make redevelopment/revitalization efforts
attractive in older areas of the community, including incentives
and potential relief from regulatory provisions geared toward new
development.
4) Emphasizing neighborhood integrity and protection as both
residential structures and streets and other local infrastructure
continue to age.
5) Stepping up efforts to revive and/or promote re -use of vacant and
obsolete retail properties.
6) Ensuring adequate standards and oversight of infill development on
scattered parcels.
7) Building upon strategic public investments, such as the recent
development of Five Points Town Plaza, revitalization of the Sylvan
Beach, and the community —wide hike and bike trail system.
8) Working to reduce the leakage of retail spending just outside the
community by encouraging and providing incentives for more sit-down
restaurants and other retail -oriented opportunities that residents wish
to patronize locally.
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives are intended to address the specific issues and needs identified
during the public participation process (and outlined in Chapter 1, Plan
Context).
z Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington. Report No. 38 — Infill
Development Strategies for Shaping Livable Neighborhoods. June 1997.
http://www.mrsc.org/Publications/textfill.aspx. Retrieved on August 31, 2011.
GOAL 1: Provide additional attention and resources to promote new
infill development and redevelopment/revitalization of established
areas.
Red evelopment/reh.,bili oti^^ revitalization efforts require cooperative
action to encourage new and sustained private investment and to provide
supporting rehabilitation of public infrastructure. A key part of the process is
determining the strategic actions and initiatives the community should take
to achieve its redevelopment goals and objectives. Successful redevelopment
will often require cooperation and coordination between agencies at
different levels of government, as well as non-profit community
organizations. This should include coordination of physical improvements
with social service programs that aim to enhance the health and economic
capacity of residents in targeted neighborhoods. There are several sizeable
undeveloped and underdeveloped parcels within the City that provide
opportunities for infill development where streets and utilities already exist
or may be readily extended. There are also many individual lots that may be
developed. In addition, there are several areas that warrant consideration of
redevelopment or revitalization during the 20-year horizon of this plan.
Action and Initiatives
1) Conduct individual redevelopment or rehab.l:*ation revitalization plans
for those areas identified on Map 2.1'de'"�Y!{'rnr
T^r^'-tRev►tahzat►on Areas. These plans should be created in partnership rrary��.. p p p
with the City, land and business owners, adjacent property owners, and
other stakeholders to determine the most appropriate courses of action
to improve these areas.
.1.....SnI.Ar.�.#...in#nr�ar#...nrr nncx...#knca..l.nnrl...n.n.rl./rN JF A.es.innr...nAnAnnr.�r...#n,...nnx.#.mcw....in
n i+ k1ichinn ->... rn 4n... 1l nn+ n l+hnri#v.. fnr #hn....n! lrn of dn..nlnninn
ax�„Y.Y�y.....rY.,Y
redevelop .rxa.e.ra.#....nr....r�k�.n.ka.il.i#.n.#.ican....p! V 1..x..a.....n.rafl....#.ka.� ryn aan�....cad...fi.n-..VMr n.Yz....n.n.r.l.
3_1........1& 17, flj .fk ...._in#nnr,n.! f!_A#A_!rn rkY_n Yrhn ... of ...#l�ca _iroclnAAnlnrarrYcan# ....arcaax�...
Su bsequen fly,"o''s+i-hsri,b'Y"+b'Yo n. no....ter..
in#nncl 4 nl nw 1-nm i- n! l+cm...
...-.,-
4)2.),Determine the appropriate zoning of infill development tracts and
initiate rezoning as appropriate. Zoning actions should be in accordance
with the Future Land Use Plan, and care must be taken to ensure that
the neighborhood character is preserved and compatibility with existing
uses is observed.
53.),Review and amend the City's development ordinances to identify and
resolve regulatory impediments to infill development, redevelopment,
and revitalization. Incorporate standards that are unique and applicable
to these sites.
GOAL 2: Continue investment in the Main Street, Sylvan Beach,
and the original town area around Downtown.
As identified throughout the public process, through previous
planning efforts, e.g., the City of La Porte's Economic Development
Strategic Plan, and as expressed by the City's Main Street Program,
the Greater Downtown area of La Porte has and will continue to play a
significant role in the City's long-term future. Enhancing this and the
surrounding areas will encourage economic growth and improve the
quality of life for City residents.
Action and Initiatives
1) Prepare a master plan for the Greater Downtown area. The
purpose of the plan is to establish a clear and collectively Is
supported vision and then an implementation framework to guide
reinvestment and new investment in the Greater Downtown area
of La Porte, including the areas of Main Street and Sylvan Beach. This
plan should build off the City's revitalization initiatives in Downtown
(e.g., Five Points Town Plaza, the San Jacinto off-street trail/sidewalk,
and the City/County improvements at Sylvan Beach), identifying
opportunities to bolster Downtown as an attractive and lightly functional
center of activity based on its unique assets. The plan should identify the
appropriate land uses and the arrangement and form of
development/redevelopment, along with well -planned and designed
improvements to streets and parking areas, vehicular and pedestrian
access and circulation, streetscape the amenities, signage, lighting, and
infrastructure upgrades. In addition, this master plan should:
a) Assess the constraints to redevelopment and the effective use of
Downtown properties and buildings. Such factors as land and
buildings ownership, traffic and pedestrian circulation, parking,
building sizes, building code issues (such as ADA accessibility), lease
rates, and other contributing factors should be addressed in the
plan.
b) Address the fringe and/or transitional areas immediately adjacent to
identify measures to secure their integrity.
c) Include details on the use of design elements and unifying
treatments (could include wayfinding signage), in addition to the
gateway monuments, to demarcate the boundaries of this area so
that it is distinguished from other areas of the community.
2) Consider revisingRev so regulatory provisions in the Main Street District
to ensure new development creates an urban chaaracterform. This could
include:
a) Modifying the Main Street purpose statement to include an intent of
creating a human -scaled urban character envir, - mrnen*form
comprised of mixed uses.
b) Specifying front yard setback provisions as build -to lines, rather than
an "average of the existing structures on that side of the street on
the same side of the street or the setback of the closest structure
on an adjacent lot." The existing provisions will not ensure an
urban character fo.rm.over the long-term.
c)Specifying minimum height requirements as an urban form
requires a visual sense of enclosure.
The current provisions only specify that a maximum height is
to be determined.
d)Adding some level of building standards relating to scale and
massing, materials, exterior treatments, site lighting, and
signs and awnings.
3) Continue to monitor investor interest in Downtown
residential projects, including attached single-family, multi -family,
and residential -over -retail opportunities. Work with private
interests to pinpoint and remove or reduce barriers to new
development and redevelopment in and around Downtown.
Additional ownership housing options are needed, but such
housing alternatives need to be planned and permitted by -right.
4) Continue to work with the Economic Development
Corporation (EDC) to offer Main Street Enhancement Grants to
provide matching funds to enhance existing buildings in the Main
Street District, including fagade rehabilitation or enhancement;
new awnings, canopies, porches, and signage; and other
beautification projects.
5) Continue partnering with the county and other
stakeholders in the redevelopment of the Sylvan Beach area (e.g.,
the rehabilitation of the Sylvan Beach Pavilion and other such
improvements) so that the park grows as a local attraction (and
local amenity) similar in quality to the one envisioned in the 2004
Sylvan Beach Park Master Plan.
6) Continue to pursue an array of waterfront public/private
development projects (e.g., restaurants and other retail
opportunities, conference facilities, among others) to compliment
the beach park and fishing activities and to generate additional
revenues.
Focus Area 2 - Quality Neighborhoods and
Housing
La Porte's long-term future is inextricably tied to its housing
availability and conditions. Housing is central to almost any
discussion about City affairs, no matter whether the discussion is
on economic development, desire for additional local commercial
retail opportunities, or the ability to walk from one neighborhood
to another. While one challenge is to sustain the integrity of
existing housing, another is to address future housing needs.
Having a diverse stock of housing — new and old, big and small — is
instrumental in offering choice and providing for the individual needs of all
households, regardless of economic stature. Besides price and location,
another consideration is the design of neighborhoods. The areas that were
developed in the late 1960s (with the Spenwick Subdivision) departed from
the established town settlement patterns near the core of the City. New
housing development and redevelopment needs to reflect a growing
demand for neighborhood -style patterns that are once again, integrated into
the existing fabric of the community.
Key Planning Considerations
Key planning considerations for ensuring
quality neighborhoods and housing include:
1) Addressing "life cycle" housing needs by
offering a wider range of housing types
and price ranges so that residents can
make lifestyle transitions as they age
(e.g., from "starter" housing into a larger
dwelling to accommodate a family, then
into an "empty nester" situation, and
finally into a down -sized space and/or
"assisted living" or full-time care facility
as health conditions dictate.
2) Encouraging mixed -use, compact, and
pedestrian -oriented developments that
can serve the "node" function desired by
residents and include types of amenities
currently absent in La Porte (e.g.,
walkable residential/commercial mixed
2% 11%
use areas). OEM=
3) Emphasizing neighborhood integrity and
protection as both housing structures and
streets and other local infrastructure continue to age.
Al I I,;-- "1;n 4 ; 4-kaA, .,k;'k o m - �o r
rr.r�...rrW�r rra:y. r.. e:.r r�r�r-ru;.rrzv
,j_� *YI comas.-i*ihla.d evel-...m.an+...
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives address the specific issues and needs identified during the public
participation process (and outlined in Chapter1, Plan Context).
GOAL 3: Protect the integrity of existing neighborhoods.
Neighborhoods are one of La Porte's greatest assets as they form a
foundation for a sound quality of life. Strengthening neighborhoods through
organization, communication, coordination, and education is a key for
maintaining and improving livable neighborhood environments. Established,
stable neighborhoods must be preserved and protected from encroaching
incompatible development while new neighborhoods should be developed in
Built 2005 or later
in Built 2000 to 2004
Built 1990 to 1999
Built 1980 to 1989
Built 1970 to 1979
Built 1960 or prior
accordance with Smart Growth a^ �nmm n +„ rh ara r+nr nr nr nlnc rin+- H-4
rrurrrr_Y _rruru,. I,rrrr.rlrr
#hrnArrthnr # +hic ..elan In essence neighborhoods that are safe well-
urr..ubrr,.,u1 urr., 1.,rurr. , ,
maintained, and are of a quality, enduring character, will maintain property
values and thus, a sound neighborhood environment and stable residential
tax base.
The City can greatly enhance the quality of life for its citizens by enacting
ordinances and incentives to protect and enhance the integrity of its
neighborhoods. Mechanisms to improve the quality of neighborhoods may
include ordinances focused on neighborhood conservation; provision of
improved or updated public facilities and services such as streets, sidewalks,
trails, neighborhood parks, street lighting, drainage systems, pedestrian
amenities, traffic control, neighborhood policing and fire protection;
enforcement of codes and ordinances; providing support for the creation or
the organization of qualified neighborhood organizations by providing
technical assistance with private restrictions and/or conducting special
neighborhood studies (including redevelopment and/or -eh.ubi.I.tutiol
revi.tallzation...plans); providing funds for neighborhood improvements, and,
generally investing or reinvesting in the community's neighborhoods.
Actions and Initiatives
On�.a...cal=...#.ka.�a....mr-as.#...�afl=s�r.#a.ar a...rn.r.�.,ec...#n...rarc.N ate.#....n a.Aax.ka.6 r.kann.cl....A.ra.#�aaxr.Al.ar...a. t.larcaa..ArX.6.
One .,r �r r... r��..,,,� ....r r...... ter..... ..., Y,, '0 p.r..,�.....t rr...rbrr..,..,r rrood r.. eg..�Y r,, '...--b..
+h n...I M n l nm nn+a+.inn nf_nnirthhnrh nnrl_cnncnr,.r-a+inn..dic+ric+c. Ac dn+-ailncl... I.ni—r
r.rr...--rr�rL,r....rrra_rrr_ur_�r�rr..,r
.a..n#,sar....#h.Ra..caacic.#a.nrx..ncairah..4acar.hcacaAc..+h.a.#..-ar..ca...,sanuecira.n.car.I..-ac..roxy. rxininn.
�..—t a.— .... r r.r,,r.,rr....... ..r,, r...r��.,rr rrrrb
c+ahlo r ., +ho 7n_„oar nlanninrt hrari�ran a r fl-4-ed ran +ho rrr+rrrrt I rr 4
:_reerry ra::.....yy:.:yn...y.......ry..ry._......y_.,i3..........r.y.ry.r..rr.e3.r.y.....�y...............`..r-ra:.�v- ar....- y.r.y.....y:.y..r,e:.....y...yWx.y
UseIJlnn .. as Nei !'.nncca r,r-a.*inn (.l11.r1 \II L.i*hin -ara.. aer, nn r�l nr4 �nninra
..,.,........r ru. r -as r.ei 1r.,ur r —o— ur r
rardi-trance chrar rld +hon ho n Jinrt Joc�rin+i ,nc ac +ra n ailinrt I ,+ n r, „
yr vrer rx.rr rv..u.....s-r res�u�rax...rrr,:.: r.r....u�c_.... e.��c:rr�r ��c_.�slrvr�raxr r rb.. wsv_. sw: r rlstres-r r.s..
rune cn+h.-arLc flnnr arna and n+h nr rri+nri->._,nri+h h,.r_rirth+. n r n,ric nnc -allnrn4—
yr:_.+;�:.._.,,.,...�r::,�u��.r.yi._y.y.ay�.:. u,-_u,urr�:r....�.,r.rr�..r.....a;.....r.�..r...r.,�y....rrarrr.rr.�.y._Y...rrbrr..._r:.,-.,r ".,u.r.y.y.r..,b
C.er*.uln kn.rwCA-A ..n..r .pr..n..N.`rar#y.....I`r proa�cn`.Im,n.n* t... .... e..nukal,n.......(nn.r.4l.......enl��:wArugn�..).
rninw.,nc+mnn+ Thn. nr rrnncn of +hncn I\IC rlic+rir+c is +n. nrncnr,,n nnirthhnrhnnd.
r .�:._r.r..rar a_.., u,-ra::.-rrr_. r-r..y�. I•' a" r �,.�.,..., a_ .., r..._�.r-r �.. y.u....y..,r.� u..,c�r-ram r_ } r �...�.�.,,. I., r ....,..�:._r. rr ... �.-r�:rb r r y,.�,.r..y-r o�ayu�
character ...and establich.. c#anrl-arrlc cnncic#nn+ ,eri+h #hnc aose a+ +hnthe #ithnemn of
OFF,u e.: yr-�:. r�,:rlrr -r rw s rt� �sa.r � t:•r�ru�i� �r -rv,rn�r�a:v,.rr rr brs , ur_ry e ' vru.tiinn+ -4—A..
ActAga.rar...a.nrr.#..l.n.Aiti...ar.te. -rekr..
7 1 Lrinn+ifw nc+-ahlichnrl. nnirthhnrhnncic ,.n ri+h �nhnci,.,rrn rharar+nr anal.
YY _rrrrr�rr .:.,rr....,r<:. ..rrur�..r....r
rcana.Rxaeani.#,.s..i.cl.ca.n.#a.#ar.....a,A...r.ryaa.#.ca...n.ca.iczhka.ca..r.K. rx.rJ.....rra.ns.n.rar.a#inn....rl.rc#rir..#.c..*n..
rr�r'Y urru ..r ,�, nexig r,.,.,rrr.,.,.. con-,...r..,t.c.. to
n r ,+oc+ an J n ,+o +ho o is+inrt n 'rthh ,rh , , J fool In nAA;+iran nil—,
Yrr ar r:::::vt� ur..r.u.....Y•,y a:rr�r�rar��w:. tiv r,.::....a:�ra,,j�ey r.r.b...r ra::.rb.r..rrr�c:ry �v �r°c:re:r�rr ya..w::v.....ry.r...xve�:r�ryr r.y e.rr.,.y....e:ry vcs�w�u�
for reasonable irv,rarna nerxsan+c An..._#hncn.._cauAc+ nrt. nnArthhnrhnnrlc .\ AA#hnA_Ah
ti,horc , ti,o ,. co Jr rroc Inclr r Jo h,._rirth+ c+an Jar Jc f ,r —L,;nrt �r r an�o
e:ax rr rrsvy��sa.rrri,:.:...v ur�rurraw.:��frr��c:r�,:..uura:..�:x� �rr rw:ruea,:.:..uY..r.r�brre��si�ny�rerrrrus.. ra.rr��rr-r,s�rer,.rb.
imnrn,.rn n+c +n h,.,ilrlinrtc...+n nncr..rrn +ha.+ +hn,,...r—in.. in rharar+nr....,ari+h.
rr r rF,r Y--r
hca..n.ca.irx.ka.kara.r.karara.cl...n.rl.rlca.nn*..arl:.ccarccal,r..irr na.r.#.#kasa.a.ec.ca..a.nrl..nn.in, .......
y rr � �N.,..< <r r......,....,r r.....r r�.,y r � �...r r�
nnirthhnrinrt nrnnnr+inc....
21)Consider an annual registration of neighborhood, home -owner, and
tenant associations so that updated contact information can be
maintained and used to disseminate important community -wide
information (including such things as nearby development applications
or rezonings, capital improvement projects, and applicable ordinance
changes).
?)2)Consider formalizing a neighborhood -oriented planning program to:
a) Assist developers in their preparation of covenants and restrictions
for new development.
b) Ensure private common areas and amenities are adequately
maintained in perpetuity.
c) Implement neighborhood watch programs; this may be done in
coordination with the La Porte Police Department's Police Area
Representative (PAR) program.
d) Help older communities develop neighborhood plans, which may
include elements that would normally be required for a housing
grant submittal and could, thus, be very effective as a grant
administration tool. Such a plan would highlight potential
development/redevelopment sites, infrastructure improvements,
increased buffering (to mitigate such things as noise from increased
truck traffic), links to important off -site amenities, etc.
e) Establish and facilitate an annual city-wide neighborhood, home-
owner, and tenant association meeting to gather input on how to
better coordinate efforts and develop partnerships
while seeking mutual benefit.
41,3.).Expand and promote increased awareness of the City's
program on traffic calming. This could include notifying
the neighborhood, homeowner, and tenant associations
about the program, increasing available funding, and
expanding the types of calming measures available, e.g.,
speed humps, bulb -outs, raised cross -walks, chicanes,
etc.
4) Provide technical planning support for established
neighborhoods. Such support could address issues
related to open space preservation, street and sidewalk
improvements, traffic control, crime prevention through
environmental design (CPTED), code enforcement or
navigating the available housing programs.
5) Consider modifying existing codes to improve compatibility between
.....
commercial areas and abutting residential properties. This could include
adding bulk and scale limitations (e.g., residential in scale); better design
sign, and lighting controls; improved buffering, among others.
GOAL 4: Promote opportunities for neighborhood improvement and
housing stock rehabilitation of the housing stock.
The community must remain cognizant of its older housing stock as
rehabilitation and reinvestment will become increasingly important to the
integrity and vitality of neighborhoods, particularly in the older areas around
Downtown, as well as in some areas throughout the community. Comments
by residents during public participationut the puh!ic workshops indicated
concerns about some of these areas being "not well kept." C^A_e
nnfnrrnrxanra* if.dnnn nrn-a�*A,rnI,A r-an.. ran-y.._In+ *n..r,rn,rnn*..*hnsn.._-yr air _Frnm.
fr rr+hor do+ori.,r�+i.,n
rur erra:.r ua:..ea�.-r -ry ru-ry r.r..
Actions and Initiatives
1) Encourage redevelopment in target areas through programs that target
lots that are abandoned or have recently demolished structures so that
those lots are put back onto the market and tax rolls.
2) Consider forming a target -area community investment program focused
on all infrastructure improvements (e.g., sidewalk installation in addition
to repair, driveway culvert cleaning and replacement, alley
improvements, tree trimming, parking restrictions, shielded street
lighting or other improved pedestrian lighting, added greenspace,
improved public streetscape/ landscape areas, new signage, etc.) within
at -risk neighborhoods. This would be an expansion of the current
program that provides dedicated funding for sidewalk repair and
maintenance. The purpose of this program is to provide a dedicated
source of annual funding for use in making infrastructure improvements
and leveraging private reinvestment through rehabilitation,
building additions, and/or infill development.
3) Consider the use of tax abatement, reduced building
permit or utility tap fees, and other financial programs or
incentives to elicit private sector reinvestment.
4)
o r�on•,o �.,n�o
yyy...+r,e:.r.y..r,e:.r.y.y:....y�,.y.....y:.�.y..�.`..ry.r.y.�....�.....�.�.r..exrry..r....�y.r..`.yy.....r.e3.r.....yy.... a:crrrvc_:rrtirrc:rere.srr
of ,u al_n innC_r, rah ac.. ,arnnrLr dnhris and.. irrnl ... �rnhirinc• k,n n!n,rnr..
..� . i.. ratio s uc � as .........a,,, .a.....,ris, M .u... Jug ��. ��..� ��<.�<.:-:,� 11......
.
�I+ornan+i,.o n o 0
ha`"r svrw.: urta.:r r rrxr_rvr.:. v.rue_. .:.rervrv..:.-rr re..r rr: r-rrwtr ryas yry e.rrr r::r rua..uuvyv ery
4an rv,nrn nrn-ar* ,An -anal nncr rrn -N- An nr r*rnrYynl..-Consider the use
riu�,�......ya.....,rr,...:�.
of an advocacy program to aid in code compliance (e.g., violations
such as weeds, debris, and junk vehicles) rather than citing
noncompliant property owners. A key element may be the cross -
training of enforcement advocacy officers in conflict
management/resolution or the creation of useful information
packets listing sources of help for homeowners who are in
violation of City codes.
p G).............. q*r;r,*l.y inn fnrrn`..rn`rn,Qu# nff�nnu#n`#4�that ..ch. ro-0r F-0—lut or
confidence..
6)5).......... Promote neighborhood pride by stimulating resident
involvement in improvement activities, including:
a) Seasonal "clean up, fix up" events;
b) "Neighborhood Pride" days focusing on beautification; and
c) Annual "amnesty pickup" days of large refuse items with the
assistance of City crews and volunteers.
7)6)Seek the participation of churches, civic organizations, schools, and
businesses in neighborhood improvement and revitalization efforts.
R7)Continue the program of identifying and demolishing substandard
structures; coordinate demolition with a proactive and effective program
to provide incentives for home building on empty lots. This may include
marketing these properties on the City's website, streamlining the
permit approval process, and reduced permitting fees.
98)Strengthen the ability for local organizations, e.g., Sheltering Arms Senior
Services, Inc., to support weatherization and energy efficiency
improvements in existing neighborhoods. The Weatherization Assistance
Program (WAP) is sponsored by the Texas Department of Housing and
Community Affairs and helps low-income persons, particularly the
elderly and persons with special needs, control their home energy costs.
Local organizations need additional support so that more weatherization
improvement options are made available. The City may also actively
support these local organizations by partnering with them on grant
applications or hosting weatherization open houses or organizing
energy -efficiency audits.
1)9) Continue to apply for Community Development Block Grant (CBDG)
funds, HOME Grant funds, or other grant or loan programs to create or
rehabilitate affordable housing for low-income households.
xx)10).... Continue to coordinate with and help to promote housing assistance
programs of the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation and the
Harris County Community Development Agency.
GOAL 5: Ensure affordable and sufficient housing options in the
future.
The availability and affordability of different housing options leads to a
higher quality of life. In general, as more types and affordable housing
options are supplied, a greater number of residents will be able to live and
work in La Porte. Therefore, anticipating and meeting future housing
demand is essential for the City's economic development success, and
planning will enable the community to respond effectively to the needs of a
variety of market segments, from young singles and newly married couples
to large families, empty nesters, seniors, and retirees looking to downsize.
The City currently has a narrow range of owner -occupied neighborhoods and
housing types, with the current mix being predominantly single-family
detached residential dwellings. Indeed, as displayed in the Demographic
Snapshot in Chapter 1, La Porte has the highest percentage of one -unit
structures (84 percent), which is higher than all the comparison cities, the
county, and the state. This leaves little room for choice among housing
types. In the future, aging residents may desire to have more housing
options available, including maintenance free condominiums and additional
assisted living and continuing care facilities. In addition, units marketable to
households that are "downsizing" should be permitted and encouraged in
appropriate locations. Examples of these varied units are depicted in the
inset, which may include duplexes, patio homes, townhomes, and
multiplexes. This does not mean that there is not a market for single-family
homes; rather, it means that future development should
incorporate more housing diversity so that existing and future
residents will have sufficient options, from large lot single-
family dwellings (e.g., in the Lomax area), to residential above
retail lofts, live/work units, and attached living.
Lack of affordability is a concern. When there is a lack of
affordable housing options available, it increases individual
and/or family distress and is considered to have negative
effects on a community's overall health. The City recognizes the
need to ensure that all of La Porte's residents enjoy access to
quality and affordable housing within livable and attractive
environments. Maintaining livability as the City transitions to an
infill and redevelopment focus will require creativity and a
willingness to coordinate efforts. The qualities that make La
Porte an attractive place to live are also making La Porte an
expensive place to live. Increasing housing prices creates
obstacles for low-income households and threatens to push
residents to unsatisfactory housing options. The inability to find
housing locally poses a hardship for households seeking an
affordable home, as well as employers seeking employees.
Actions and Initiatives
1) Encourage life -cycle housing options in new
developments that will offer alternatives to existing and future
residents. New development and redevelopment should
include more than one housing type, with ordinance provisions
for increased open space as separation and buffering and other
standards to ensure compatibility. A combination of housing
options and lot sizes will result in a diversity of housing choices
— choices that will be useful in attracting and keeping singles,
younger families, and older residents.
2) Consider incorporating accessory dwelling units in the
zoning ordinance, along with appropriate provisions governing
their use and compatibility. They are common and increasing in
popularity in many communities to accommodate elderly
parents or relatives (i.e., "granny flats"), young adult family
members wanting to live independently but close by, or
students in need of basic, low-cost housing.
3) Consider adopting design standards for high -density
residential development, which may include provisions for
building form and scale, articulated building walls, building
orientation, architectural detailing, roof types and materials,
fagade enhancements, and acceptable building materials, as
well as site design standards regarding landscape surface,
parking location and arrangement, bufferyards, and site
amenities.
4) Consider eEstablishing an average, rather than
minimum, lot size in the residential districts whereby lot
sizes are required to vary in width, with a certain
percentage being narrower and the remaining being
wider than the average. For example, the average lot
size may allow a variability of 10 percent (see inset o^
5) In appropriate locations where increased open space is
desired or needed to preserve resource features (e.g.,
wetlands, tree stands, drainage channels) or to protect
compatibility between adjacent developments, consider
WBUZ &R I ii,
allowing flexible site design and low impact
development options that permit alternative treatment
of utilities and infrastructure. There can be significant
cost savings to development from flexible site design and
cluster development techniques, which translate into reduced
lot and house prices (e.g., reduced linear feet of street, pipe,
sidewalk; fewer street lights, fire hydrants; reduced
stormwater management needs; etc.).
T
6) Maintain an Large....... Lot..... Estate residential district .(i...e........the
...
Lomax Area) so that those seeking larger -lot living
arrangements with a more open feel, be accommodated
within City limits.
7) Considering pProvidinge a density bonus to offset smaller
units or attached housing in order to avoid
significantly affecting the feasibility of the
residential development. Density bonuses are a type
of housing production program where projects are
granted additional residential density over and
above the maximum limit allowed by existing
zoning, with the condition that the additional
housing is restricted to occupancy by a certain
target group and that the units remain affordable
over time.
8) Continue sponsoring the Bay Area Habitat for
Humanity program as one method of increasing
housing affordability within the City.
Focus Area 3 - Enhanced Community
Character
The appearance of La Porte is the single most evident
glimpse of its economic vitality, government
proactiveness, and civic pride. The initial impression is
C. raphic.to be..remove.d.
formed by the quality of development, property upkeep, condition of public
facilities, amount and quality of public spaces, and the design of roadways
and other public buildings and infrastructure. Visual appeal reinforces the
quality of life for those who reside in La Porte, as well as those making
investment decisions.
The City has a window of opportunity to enact policies and standards that
influence the quality of its natural and built environments. Without a plan
and development standards to accentuate the design of corridors, districts
(like Downtown), neighborhoods, and open spaces, there may be a sense of
"sameness" in the community with little to distinguish it from the
surrounding cities. The City's character and appearance (i.e., the City's
image) was among the concerns expressed throughout the public process.
Indeed, the character of new development and redevelopment will
contribute to the community's image and may affect the City's ability to
attract and maintain new investment.
Finally, aesthetic enhancements such as the design of buildings, landscaping
and screening, sign control, and site amenities also contribute to enhanced
community character.
Key Planning Considerations
Key planning considerations for enhancing community character include:
1) Pursuing opportunities to create unique, signature areas in the
community (particular destinations, corridors, public facilities, parks and
open space areas).
2) Enhancing first impression and "front door" appearance by focusing on
the aesthetic treatments at community entries.
3) Coordinating gateway improvements so that a consistent, high -quality
appearance exists at all entry points to the City.
4) Enhancing wayfinding, not only to help residents and visitors navigate
the community and find its key destinations, but also as a unifying design
element across the City.
5) Improving the appearance of the City's primary corridors so that an
enhanced image of the City is created.
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives address specific issues and needs identified during the public
participation process (and outlined in Chapter1, Plan Context).
GOAL 6: Enhance the overall appearance of the built environment in
the City.
To be fully effective in achieving the community's vision for the future,
proactive efforts shouldmust be undertaken to improve the appearance of
the built environment within the City. Unfortunately, the needs often
outweigh the financial or administrative resources available to achieve the
desired outcomes. Therefore, it is recognized that there are areas of La Porte
that are more visible and, thus, may serve as a "starting point" to initiate
these enhancement efforts.
There are a large variety of components that contribute to the visual
appearance and "feel" of a community. Some components are more
apparent than others, although they all contribute to the overall character of
the community. Since the last plan update, the City has been proactive in
improving the appearance of the City, including the installation of gateway
signage, and investments in public amenities such as the revitalized Five
Points Town Plaza and the emerging Ccity-wide trail system. However,
according to the sentiments expressed during the public participation
process, the citizens feel that continued improvement is a priority.
Actions and Initiatives
1) Expand the efforts started with Ordinance 1501-II (which was intended,
partly, as a means to mitigate the visual impacts of container yards) to
require existing non -conformities' in designated enhancement corridors
to be brought into compliance over a reasonable period of time. Similar
provisions have been adopted elsewhere in Texas where nonconforming
site conditions (e.g., parking lot landscaping and screening outdoor
storage and display, fencing, buffering, signage, etc.) must be registered
with the City and steadily brought into compliance over a period of
years.
2) Outside of City limits, partner with the entities in which the City has
interlocal agreements to determine strategies to increase the level of
screening of container yards that exist along the City's entry corridors
and periphery.
3) Consider the development of corridor enhancement plans for the
primary and secondary enhancement corridors depicted in Map 2.2,
Beautification Plan. (Additional guidance can be found in Chapter 4,
Community Mobility.
4) Enhance the appearance of properties adjacent to street corridors by
evaluating and improving codes and standards for better building
placement (build -to, maximum vs. minimum setbacks), design (building
shape, wall articulation, entry identification, transparency, 3100 360
degree architecture), and materials; improved parking lot, streetscape
and foundation landscaping; higher quality screening of outdoor storage;
management of outdoor display; improved lighting and sign controls;
and improved buffering of adjacent properties.
5) Expand on previous efforts to consider embellished
gateway treatments with more significant "signature"
monuments, landscaping, and lighting at the locations of
greatest visibility. Ensure high quality maintenance of these
areas, as depicted on Map 2.2, Beautification Plan.
1) Consider......m%lodifying existing codes to adopt
appropriate design standards in conformance with the San
Jacinto Corridor Design Standards.
2) Continue to work with the Economic Alliance Houston
Port Region and consider code modifications and other program
support to implement the San Jacinto Historic District design
standards, including the Project Stars Initiative, which uses
industrial infrastructure and landscaping to highlight and
celebrate the area's history and historical significance.3
3) Consider implementing a program to publicly recognize
residential and business property owners for their role toward
enhancing the visual appearance of the City. This could include
monthly recognition on the City's website or other public
communication media.
A Partner with the Texas Department of Transportation
(TxDOT) to enhance the visual appearance of the City's existing
and future overpasses, as depicted on Map 2.2, Beautification
Plan.(see inset next page)
.. ......... ......... .........
5)4) Continue seeking public/public and/or public/private
partnerships to master plan and implement site specific
enhancements throughout the City. By way of example,
continue working with the La Porte Independent School District
(ISD) and adjacent retail center owners to implement the
enhancements depicted in the Texas Avenue Beautification
Project Master Plan, among others.
6)5) .Partner with TxDOT to enhance the visual appearance of
the Miller Cut Off Road, Sens Road, and SR 146 interchange
areas. These enhancements could be similar in type and quality
to the improvements already completed at the State Highway
225/Independence Parkway interchange located just outside
City limits, as depicted on Map 2.2, Beautification Plan.
3 Economic Alliance Houston Port Region. San Jacinto Texas, Historic District Corridor
Standards at http://www.ci.la-
porte.tx.us/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BloblD=8725. May 2010.
7 6)Create a comprehensive wayfinding program to project a
consistent image for the entire City and to provide directional
guidance to the area's greatest assets, i.e., Main Street and
Sylvan Beach. Partner with TxDOT to develop and obtain
approval for a Wayfinding Sign Guide System Plan.
8.)7).Evaluate program criteria and make necessary improvements
to achieve certification through the Scenic City Certification
Program. Sponsored by Scenic Texas, this certification
recognizes Texas municipalities that implement high -quality
scenic standards for public roadways and public spaces, with
the long-term goal of improving the image of all cities.
9-)8)Evaluate program criteria and make necessary improvements
to gain recognition in the Tree City USA Program. Sponsored
by the Arbor Day Foundation, this program helps
communities become better stewards of their tree resources.
Focus Area 4 - Adequate Parks, Recreation, and
Open Space
Parks and recreation facilities are an essential part of a healthy,
quality, and vibrant community environment. They provide the
necessary components for events outside the home and after
work and after school activities. Whether for passive or active
use, parks and recreation facilities are an important factor of
everyday living, active living — serving health benefits for children,
seniors, and people of all ages. The park system also enhances the
community's "quality of life" factor, boosting economic
development efforts to recruit and retain a skilled workforce;
build a strong tax base to finance system expansion, facility
enhancements, and maintenance; and attract retirees.
It is clear that La Porte places high value on its park and
recreation system. Subsequent to the last comprehensive
planning process, in 1998, the City prepared and adopted a
separate Parks and Open Space Master Plan (2002; amended
2008) and Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail Implementation Plan
(2003); both of which the City has been actively implementing in
the over the past several years. This section of the
Comprehensive Plan is not intended to supplant those separate
specific master plans; rather it is intended to review those plans
in terms of how they currently fit within the overall framework of
a 20-year planning horizon —meaning, will the full
implementation of those plans achieve the goals of creating a
park, recreation, and open space system that is high quality (safe
and well maintained), convenient and accessible (to its users),
diversified (in its activities), and interconnected (to the
community), while trying to preserve and protect La Porte's
natural assets. Note that while trails are an integral part of a
park and recreation system, they are an equally important part
of the City's non -vehicular mobility system, and as such, will be
discussed in Chapter 4, Community Mobility.
14"' Street Park I 2.40 The City Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the
Bay Oaks Park 1.20 0 operation and maintenance of all parks and recreational
Brookglen Park 2.0 facilities. Their ultimate goal is to "to provide and manage
Central Park 4.60 superior parks and recreational facilities, innovative programs,
Creekmont Park 3.50 and services that will provide our customers with pleasure and
enrichment."
Glen Meadows 8.13
Ohio Street
0.93
Existing Park Inventory
Pete Gilliam
1.20
The foundation for establishing an adequate park and recreation
Pfeiffer
1.20
system is the availability and condition of the existing parks and
Pine Bluff
0.11
recreation areas. To assess the projected future need for
additional land, facilities, and improvements, it is essential to
Seabreeze
3.13
first determine the level of service provided by the existing parks
Spencer Landing.99
and recreation system. Subsequently, the level of sufficiency or
Spenwick
0.50
deficiency of the existing system can be determined to assess
Tom Brown
0.57
the current need prior to projecting the future parks and
Woodfalls
8.30
recreation system needs.
Neighborhood Park
Subtotal
3':�'41.76
Currently, the Department is responsible for 210 neighborhood
and community parks (comprising over......150......acresaY.,..;..ro;t......200
..........................................
cr_-�) two special use parks (i.e. Five Points Town Plaza and the
Parks
Acres
Bayforest Golf Course), and eleven miles of trails (see Table 2.1,
Fairmont Park
17.70
Existing Parks and Map 2.3, Park Inventory). Overall, the City
has a total of 22 23 parks and recreation facilities comprised of
Little Cedar Bayou
34.70
playgrounds and playscapes; picnic amenities; baseball, softball,
Lomax
10.0o
soccer, football fields; basketball and other sports courts;
Northside Park
2.70
bicycle/pedestrian/exercise/nature trails; a senior center; a
Northwest
25.0
Special Populations Center; two bayside parks; two fishing piers;
Pecan Park
33.00
a rodeo/open riding arena; three neighborhood pools and one
Community Park >
sprayground/playground; and other amenities. Over the past 21
Subtotal'
123.10
years, the City has spent close to $18 million on its parks and
Total
1 �^• S
164.86
recreation system.
In addition to the parks and recreation areas owned and
managed by the City, there are five school playgrounds located
at the elementary schools that provide additional recreation and open space
that is available to residents and visitors of the La Porte area. The school
playgrounds are displayed in Table 2.2, School Playgrounds, and tThe City
and the La Porte Independent School District (LPISD) have a cooperative
agreement that allows joint use of City and School recreations facilities. As
displayed in Table 2.27% Private Parks, there are also five park facilities and
one neighborhood pool that are owned and maintained by the
homeowners' associations.
Parks and Recreation Standards
Standards provide a measure for determining the amount of
parks, recreation and open space needed to meet the current
and projected future demands of the City's citizens and visitors.
Parks and recreation standards are typically expressed in terms
of acres of land dedicated for parks, recreation and open space
per unit of population, such as 0.5 acres per 1,000 persons.
While general standards are useful, it is important to establish
standards that are based upon unique local considerations, such
as participation trends and projections, user characteristics,
demographics, climate, natural environment, and other
considerations. Values related to leisure and recreation are
unique to each municipality; therefore, the standards should
represent the interests and desires of local parks users.
The suggested standards from the National Recreation and
Parks Association (NRPA), as modified for La Porte's unique
conditions, are illustrated in Table, 234, NRPA Development
Standards. (on next page)
e�
Parks
Bayside Terrace Park
Acres
0.49
Fairmont Last
2..00
Fairmont West
1.18
Shady Lane
2.59
Shady River
2.35
Lomax Elementary
chool Play --rounds:.
I.Pprks Acres
2.25
Jennie RO
Elementary 0.35
Rizzuto Elementary
1.06
La Porte Elementary
7.06
Bayshore elementary
2.62
Use: Serves a concentrated population within an immediate proximity. Examples are a tot lot in an apartment
complex or a vacant lot developed as a passive park.
Service Area: Immediate development
Desirable Size: 0.25 to 1 acre
0.25 acre Der 1.000 Dersons
:: : : : : I Site Characteristics: Close proximity to high -density developments.
Use: Serves the broader community. Includes facilities for active and passive recreation and leisure, including
athletic fields, swimming pools, picnic areas, walking/jogging paths, open play areas, exercise stations, and
restrooms, among other improvements
Service Area: Primarily for neighborhood residents within a one -mile radius, but available throughout the City.
Desirable Size: Minimum 10 to 30 acres
Density: 3.0 acres per 1,000 persons
Site Characteristics: Located to Drovide full access to the citv.
Use: Serves the broader community or region for specialized, multi -purpose recreation activities (e.g. performance
...
center).
Service Area: Available to all persons.
Desirable Size: No minimum standard.
Density: No minimum standard.
::: Site Characteristics: Intended for City-wide or regional use.
Needs Assessment
To assess the adequacy of the existing parks and recreation supply, it is
necessary to look at existing population, the supply of parks provided by
existing facilities including planned improvements or expansions, and relate
them to planning standards for desirable levels of service. In addition, it is
necessary to consider forecasts in future population to determine future
needs and to identify deficiencies to address the needs of the system. As
such, the park and recreation system would have to be expanded to
accommodate a 2030 projected population of 49,927 person s4. Based upon
these parameters and displayed in Table 2.45, Parks and Recreation Needs,
the City would have to add approximately 12.16 acres of new neighborhood
parks and 26.68 'acres of new community parks to meet the needs of the
projected future population.
33.80 1 37.77 1 -3.97 1 105% 1 49.93 1 37.77 1 12.16 1 75.6%
101.40 1 123.10 1 -21.7 1 121% 1 149.78 1 123.101 26.68 1 82.1%
135.20 1 160.87 1 -25.67 1 -- 1 399.42 1 '160.87 1 38.84 1
4 Population projections are based off of the Houston -Galveston Area Council (H-
GAC) 2035 Forecast Data. See Demographic Snapshot in Chapter 1, Plan Context for
more information.
Service Areas
Evaluating service areas is an effective means of identifying geographic areas
that have sufficient park areas available, but more importantly to identify
those in need of additional parks and recreation areas and facilities.
Neighborhood parks have a service area of one -quarter (%) mile, while
community parks have a service area of one mile; which means that the
majority of the persons who utilize these facilities live within those
respective distances. The service areas for the City's parks are displayed in
Map 2.4, Park Service Areas. Since school playgrounds and private parks also
provide neighborhood -scale park and recreation benefits to City residents,
their service areas have been included in this analysis. lr ile ;choo! parks
h.ave. .n t-hear r.,-In-clA.-d-er.4A n.*ha. Inr..Iear..Jnr.4Jf..#hQ.(;.#. t
ar.y.y.......�y...
rl*�' er arx en!#Arar'.._arr#_.n F'n. #.n._*Fl.n... 1nA lIR.A.Ar`..lIA A*r'.A ll.r# .nf cCL'n!1l1�._llAanr_n#Arn.n %Ln,v rr'..
... �. .._. u.�.._.-,.�.el AAA-<.. .., F,<....:.
Park System Plan
The La Porte Park System Plan is designed to meet the requirements of the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) in order to become eligible for
grant reimbursement of up to 50 percent (with a maximum of $500,000 per
application cycle) for qualified projects. With the City being proactive in
adopting separate Parks and Open Space and Trails master plan, these
requirements have been met ...as....Ion.g....as....a.n.....u.pdate...i.s....performed....every... five.
years. Map 2.5, Park System Plan, is intended to be an intermediary analysis
that will facilitate future discussion when those separate master plans are
updated.
As the City moves forward in expanding park acreage to meet the needs of
the future projected population, the Park System Plan delineates the areas
of deficiencies within the City and should be one of the primary
considerations used to identify where future neighborhood and community
parks are located.
Key Planning Considerations
Key planning considerations for ensuring adequate parks, recreation, and
open space include:
1) All people should have equal access to recreational areas, activities,
services, and facilities regardless of personal interest, age, gender,
income, cultural background, housing environment, or handicap.
2) Public recreation should be highly coordinated among public institutions
and private entities to avoid duplication and encourage cooperation.
3) Public recreation should incorporate public services such as education,
health and fitness, transportation, and leisure.
4) Facilities should be well -planned and coordinated to ensure adequate
adaptability to future needs and requirements.
5) The availability of financial resources should be considered in all phases
of planning, acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of
spaces and facilities.
6) Public participation is critical to the eventual success of the parks and
recreation system and should, therefore, be included in all stages of the
process.
7) There should be established procedures for acquiring land for future
parks and recreation areas and facilities prior to development.
8) The design of spaces and facilities should encourage the most efficient
utilization of land, accommodate other compatible City services (e.g.,
libraries, museums, etc.), be constructed in the most sustainable, highest
quality possible, and consider the needs and desires of the intended
users.
Based on these planning considerations, the following goals, actions, and
initiatives address the specific issues and needs identified during the public
participation process and the above analysis.
GOAL Q7: Ensure all existing and future parks and recreational
facilities are maintained to an equivalent standard of quality and
excellence.
One of the topics that were discussed during the public
participation process was related to inequalities in the quality
and condition of existing parks within the City. New parks (e.g.,
Pecan Park) and improvements (e.g., the new
sprayground/playground at Brookglen Park) created a higher
standard than now exists at some other existing parks.
Actions and Initiatives
1) Establish a formalized parks -to -standards program to ensure
all parks are brought up to, and maintained in, an equivalent
quality standard. This program should include a general
maintenance and repair schedule. The priority maintenance
tasks include:
a) Resurfacing, restriping, or re -grading unpaved surfaces or
parking areas.
b) Improving drainage.
c) Increasing park accessibility.
d) Increasing the amount of signage and/or repair of
existing signage.
2) Conduct regular risk management inspections to identify and
schedule repairs, address safety issues, and conduct routine
maintenance and cleaning, and other necessary
improvements to playground and park equipment that is
funded by an adequate operating and maintenance budget.
3) Use the National Program and Playground Safety guidelines
and/or the United States Consumer Products Safety Commission
standards in the design and replacement of playground equipment, all
surface areas, and other recreational facilities and improvements.
4) Enhance landscape plantings and lawn maintenance in all parks.
a) Develop a program to improve the turf quality in all parks through
turf restoration and over seeding, re -grading (to address erosion and
drainage issues), and improved irrigation.
b) Continue to partner with Trees for Houston to add shade trees and
shrubs in each park to improve aesthetics, create much needed
shade, and improve the overall future beauty of the park system.
5) Conduct an annual condition assessment of park conditions. The
assessment should be considered during the budget preparation process
for the following fiscal year.
GOAL 98: Continue to increase the quality and diversity of amenities
in the existing and future parks to attract and accommodate people
of all ages (and non-traditional park users) for both active
and passive activities.
Actions and Initiatives
1) Focus on park and recreation improvements as a means for
elevating neighborhood viability. Highlight the importance of clean,
safe, well -maintained, and vibrant neighborhood parks as an anchor
for strong, established neighborhoods where residents and kids use
public spaces and interact on evenings and weekends.
2) Establish a policy of master planning new/revitalized parks
to develop a unique design theme for each park to broaden the
types of facilities and activities that are available across the
community and to better tie their identity to adjacent
neighborhoods.
a) Conduct neighborhood design charrettes to gather resident
input to determine unique features, types of amenities, and overall
theme. Ideas may include parks for special events, arts and culture,
heritage, eco-tourism, sustainability, etc.
3) Prepare revitalization plans for each of the existing, well
established parks. Plans should include equipment replacement and
repair, building/structure rehabilitation, new features/activities,
and other refurbishments.
4) Evaluate opportunities to add new types of amenities that
appeal to intergenerational and non-traditional users in existing
and future parks, including community gardens, dog parks, climbing
walls, bike trails, Frisbee golf, spraygrounds, running/walking trails,
checkerboard tables, art walks, sandboxes, among others.
5) Continue to add shade structures to all existing and future
parks. Shading should consist of a combination of playscape shade
structures, individual picnic shelters, and larger pavilions (which provide
more shade and more opportunities for socialization, among other
things).
6) Improve on -site and off -site accessibility to each park by developing a
sidewalk improvement program to repair, replace, or install new
sidewalks, crosswalks, and curb cuts, in high pedestrian use
neighborhoods immediately surrounding the parks, schools, and other
community facilities.
7) Incorporate on -site handicap accessible walking trails that create a loop
around the edge of each park and connect the important amenities
within the park, so that users can utilize these trails for walking, running,
biking, roller blading, pushing strollers, among other things.
8) Continue to provide adequate funding in the annual capital and
operating budgets to enhance, improve, and maintain the existing public
parks, recreation, trails, and open space.
GOAL 1 ng: Continue to add new park, recreation, and open space
areas to adequately accommodate the future needs of La Porte"s
residents and visitors.
Action and Initiatives
11..... rnnci<Jnr nc+ Ohl chinrx ter+ cavr icra +aY .�""Va'A # �...r+ �r+ras.irl�ar++i zl cac..nr+
.....� ��—e, —n— ......
cnuarafact hu?cic cnr.,n..+r, bell
2)1)Concurrent with population growth, acquire an additional 12.16 acres of
neighborhood parkland and an additional 2668 acres of community
parkland in the areas of deficiency by the year 2030. Additional acreage
could be used to:
a) Establishing a recreation fitness center on the west side of the City.
b) Constructing a natatorium built and financed through a joint City La
Porte and/or Clear Creek ISD partnership (or other interested
stakeholders).
c) Facilitating greater linear linkages between the existing trail system
and all parks, schools, neighborhoods, open spaces, and other
important community amenities.
3 2)Continue to provide adequate funding in the annual capital budget to
acquire and develop new park, recreation, trail, and open space areas
and improvements.
GOAL 1?.10: Continue to offer and expand recreational and/or
cultural programs that meet the interests and needs of persons of all
ages and abilities by providing programs independently and in
cooperation with partners.
Action and Initiatives
1) Provide opportunities for individuals and groups (including low-income,
minority, disabled, elderly, and the youth at risk populations) to
participate in cultural, recreational, and educational activities that foster
better health and wellness and strengthen both body and mind.
2) Formalize through reciprocal agreements the coordination of
programming and joint use of facilities by and between the City and the
La Porte Independent School District (LPISD), homeowner associations,
among others.
3) Continue to offer and/or enhance the Fun Times Parks and Recreation
Magazine.
4) Consider providing on-line registration for any camps, lessons,
workshops, or classes available through the City or its program partners.
5) Join with the program partners to make application for outside funding
to support and expand the City's educational and recreational
programming. Seek special funding for underprivileged residents
(particularly children) who may not have access to pools for programs
that would address need for swimming lessons in the bay.
6) Continue to expand sponsorships and investigate opportunities to
affiliate with other agencies (i.e., public/public or public/private
partnerships), special interest groups, service clubs, and the private
sector in organizing and operating special events, programs, and leagues.
7) Continue to work with youth sport associations to further develop
facilities for recreational activities including baseball, softball, basketball,
soccer, football, rugby, swimming, among others.
8) Continue to work with public and private sector groups (i.e., civic
associations, etc.) to promote the annual community activities such as
sports tournaments, festivals, outdoor concerts, fairs, and other special
events.
9) Conduct an annual meeting with the City's program partners and other
community organizations to discuss opportunities for the improved
coordination and provision of services.
Future Land Use a„d CharaCte
The essence of comprehensive planning is a recognition that La Porte does
not have to wait to react to development proposals. Rather, it can determine
where development and redevelopment will occur and what e"acter type
of land use the the new built environment will reflect. Through active
community support, this plan will ensure that development meets certain
standards and, thus, contributes to achieving the desired community
charactervision. As a guide for land development and public improvements,
Map'32..6, Future Land Use Plan, represents how and where the City will
focus new development and redevelopment over the next two decades —
and beyond. The Future Land Use Plan is an integral part of this
Comprehensive Plan and represents the most desirable land use based upon
the goals and objectives stated in the Comprehensive Plan in consideration
of existing uses and development and physical characteristics of the
community. The land use designations form the basis for zoning, and
thereby, the location of housing, commercial, and industrial areas. The
Future Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan (in Chapter 4, Mobility) are the
two most important planning tools available to the City.
In the determination of whether a specific zoning classification conforms to
the land use designation on the map, flexibility should be used to interpret
land use designations boundaries which are applied on a broad scale. Street
rights -a -way, lot lines, topography, and other features should be utilized in
the location of appropriate zoning district boundary lines. Generally, zoning
district boundaries should follow rear lot lines or alleys to preserve the
cohesiveness of the streetscape and compatibility of adjacent uses.
Zoning, when applied, breaks these areas into more specific classifications
with legally binding land use regulations that according to state law must be
"in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.5i The following discusses the
land use designations found in the Future Land Use Plan.
The..Future. Land...Use Plan for..the City of La...Porte...Is a general...physical...plan
for future development based on land use. It shows the generalized pattern
..
of planned future land use, taking into account the City, .. .. .
objectives identified throughout the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of
the land use plan is to minimize conflicts between adjacent uses, maximize
efficiency..of the..transportation network, achieve. fiscally sound decisions
pertaining to private development and public infrastructure investments,
and generally to aspire to create a livable environment for the citizens of the
community.
5 Texas Local Government Code, Sec. 211.004, Conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The future land use classifications used on the plan to depict the type and
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
density of development are as follows:
Large Lot Residential The Large Lot Residential classification was added
during the 2012 plan update and is intended to further protect the
existing large.. lot... residential areas in .... Lomax....This...classification..has..a
minimum of one -acre lot size and allows permitted uses that are in
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
conformance with the Large Lot District (LL)
Low -Density Residential The Low -Density Residential classification
includes single family residential uses with minimum lot area ranging
from 4,500 to 43,560 square feet. Other permitted uses are those in
conformance with the Low Density Residential District (R-1).
Moderate- to -High -De Residential The Moderate- to High -Density
Resi.dential...classification...... ncludes.... single family attached....or detached
dwellings, multiple family dwellings, patio homes, garden apartments,
condominiums, and _townhouses. _The minimum lot area for _these uses
ranges from....21000 t0 20,000 square feet with maximum lot covera e.
ranging from 50 to 60 percent. Moderate and High Density Residential
uses _generally include those specified in the Mid -Density Residential
District (R-2) and High -Density Residential District (R-3).
Mixed Use The Mixed Use classification was added during the 2012
plan.u.pdate..and i.s...ntended to ... provide ... deve1.opment... options in ... certaln
areas near Sylvan Beach. New or improved zoning and/or development
provisions should be_considered to ensure future development fulfills the
intent of these... particular.. areas.
Neighborhood Commercial The Neighborhood Commercial
classification was added during the 2012 plan update and is intended for
uses that are in conformance with the Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
District.
Commercial The Commercial classification includes uses that are in
conformance with the uses permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial
District (NC),_and General Commercial (GC) District.
Main Street The Main Street classification was added during the 2012
.................................................................................................................................
plan update and is intended for those uses allowed in the Main Street
(MS) and Main Street Overlay (MSO) Districts. New or improved
provisions should be considered, particularly for the Main Street District
(MS), to ensure future development reflects an urban character (e.g.,
build to lines,.. on street parking, a.mong.other considerations..
Commercial Industrial The Commercial Industrial classification
provides for the _establishment of industrial development that _is
compatible with surrounding or abutting residential districts. Uses are
limited to administrative, wholesaling, manufacturing, and related
compatible uses as defined by the Business Industrial Park (BI) District.
Industrial The Industrial classification provides for the establishment of
light and heavy industrial _development. Uses _are in _conformance _with
the Light Industrial District (LI) and Heavy Industrial District (HI)..
Parks and Open Space - The Parks and Open Space classification was
added during the 2012 plan update and is intended for existing public
Parks and recreation areas, open spaces, natural habitat areas, and areas
within the floodplain.
Public and Institutional The Public and Institutional classification
includes such uses as schools, library, utilities, and government buildings.
The....1.and....use.....pla.n....is....intended to....genera.11 guide... future.... land use decisions
.............................................................................. �.
which are typically made simultaneous to other decisions regarding the
provision of adequate public facilities and services and infrastructure
improvements. Consideration should be given to the following issues prior
to making land use decisions:
Character of the surrounding and adjacent neighborhoods;
Existing use of nearby properties, and the extent to _which a land use
classification would be in harmony with such existing uses or the
anticipated use of the properties
Suitability of the property for the uses to which would be permissible,
considering density, access and circulation, adequacy of public facilities
and services, and other considerations;
Extent to which the designated use of the orooerty would harm the
value of adiacent land us
Extent to which the proposed use designation would adversely affect the
capacity or safety of that portion of the road network influenced by the
use;
Extent to which the proposed use designation would permit excessive
air, water or noise pollution, or other environmental harm on adiacent
land use designations; and,
......The ..gain, if...any, to...the...public _health.....safety,... .and .welfare... due to.. the
existence of the land use designation.
Individual land..development..proposals should b ..considered for.approva.l at
the scale of neighborhood, sub -area, and development project planning,
which are to be considered in subsequent zoning and rezoning actions by the
Citv. These decisions should be based upon consideration of the established
policies and conformance with the Future Land Use Plan.
The Future Land Use Plan is not a zoning map, nor should it be used a . such.
The detailed pattern and location of land uses on a parcel -specific basis
cannot b...accurately predicted.for 20...years into the future Small area land
use decisions should appropriately be made at the scale of neighborhood,.
sub -area, and development project
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
planning, which are to be considered in
subsequent..zoning... and ... ezoning. actions...by
the City. These decisions should be based
upon consideration of the Future Land Use
Plan and should be consistent with the
generalized land uses shown in the plan.
Future Consideration of
Character -Based PlanninLy
One of the ways to improve community
appearance is to adopt a "character -based"
approach to zoning and land development,
which offers many benefits (see inset .... on.
next"1111111 page) when compared to a
conventional approach like that of the City's
existing ordinance. As .............. such, this
Comprehensive Plan update recommends
the. City consider ..in.the ... future ... o transition
to a character -based approach to planning.
The..... remainder of.. thi5..... chapter provides
guidance for if and when that transition
..................
might be undertaken
Community character goes beyond typical categorization of the functional
use of land — such as residential, commercial, and industrial — to account, as
well, for the physical traits one can see in an area that contribute to its "look
and feel."
A character -based approach focuses on the development intensity, which
encompasses the density and layout of residential development; the scale
and form of non-residential development; and the amount of building and
pavement coverage (i.e., impervious coverage) relative to the extent of open
space and natural vegetation or landscaping. This applies both on individual
development sites and across entire areas. It is this combination of basic land
use and the characteristics of such use that more accurately determines the
real compatibility and quality of development, as opposed to land use alone.
For instance, both Main Street and Fairmont Parkway have restaurants (i.e.,
the same use); however, when patronizing a restaurant along Main Street,
one encounters a more pedestrian -friendly environment with sidewalks,
gridded streets, buildings brought mostly to the street, and on -street
parking. In contrast, when patronizing a restaurant along Fairmont Parkway,
one encounters a more auto -oriented environment where there are no
sidewalks (or they are sporadic) and buildings are set back behind off-street
parking (see inset on next page
for an example of the same
residential use exhibiting three
different characters).
Key Planning Considerations
1) Amending the zoning
ordinance to repurpose
and recalibrate its districts
and standards to reflect
their intended community
character outcomes.
GOAL ?11: Implementing a
...................
character -based approach
........................................................................................................................................
to....lanning by..r°efocusing
the zoning ordinance to
emphasize the character
and form of development in
appropriate zoning districts.
The City's zoning ordinance was
originally adopted in the 1980s
and is based on a conventional m�
(Euclidean) approach to zoning
— one that focuses on land use
and minimum area standards.
As part of the implementation
of this comprehensive plan
update, it is erd isa bYe
recommended that the City consider at some time in the future to for the
...�b...�.rd�n�.n.r +�....be repurposed and recalibrate*d the ..... oning... and
development ordinances to place emphasis on the character of development
(without placing as much emphasis on land use). While use should remain a
secondary consideration, the density/intensity and design of development is
of much greater importance if the City is to enhance its character.
Actions and Initiatives
1) Consider revising..Rev; e the district purpose statements to define the
intended character of the district, rather than general use types. For
instance, the purpose of the R-1, Low Density Residential District is "for
low -density, single-family detached dwellings..." Instead, the purpose
may indicate the district is suburban in nature, characterized by a
balance between the landscape and buildings, which may be large lots or
smaller lots clustered around public open space. Open space and low
impervious surface ratios characterize the built environment.
2) Consider recalibrating Reca!ibrate the density and open space ratios of
each zoning district and revise the dimensional standards to reflect the
intended character. For instance, the setbacks and lot widths and
coverage should vary by character, with small setbacks and higher
coverage for neighborhoods of an urban character and larger setbacks
and lower coverage for suburban and rural neighborhoods.
3) Consider identifying Identify established neighborhoods with cohesive
character and community identity and create neighborhood
conservation districts to protect and promote the existing neighborhood
feel. In addition, allow for reasonable improvements in these existing
neighborhoods without cumbersome variance procedures. Include by -
right standards for making improvements to buildings to ensure that
they remain in character with the neighborhood and do not adversely
impact the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties.
4) Consider transitioning Transitio the existing Planned Unit Development
(PUD) regulations to a Planned Development (PD) option available in
certain districts in order to mix different housing types. This by -right
option allows the density and open space standards to be clearly defined
to reflect the intended character. A housing palette should be utilized to
clearly specify the minimum lot areas and dimensions, setbacks, building
heights, and maximum building coverage for each dwelling unit type.
These new PD provisions would include explicit density
and open space standards together with provisions for
permitted and limited uses, housing diversity,
dimensional criteria, residential and nonresidential
development standards, open space and recreation
design, subdivision layout and design, street
configurations, and bufferyards and transitions thereby
allowing them as a by -right option rather than through a
discretionary approval process.
5) Consider reviewing and revising Re.iev u^d
revise. -the lists of permitted and conditional uses in each
district. The current districts are cumulative meaning that
- single family dwellings are permitted in both low and high
density districts. The permitted uses in the commercial
district are based on their use function rather than their
scale or design character. By way of example, the
neighborhood commercial district allows drugstores,
eating places, and grocery stores with limitations of scale
or other design parameters to ensure a character that is
compatible with the adjacent neighborhood.
6) Consider adopting ^dopt a housing palette that
includes dimensional standards for each of several
housing types. The purpose of the palette is to ensure the
character (size, spacing, scale) of each housing type in a
neighborhood or mixed housing development, such as a
mixed use center or traditional neighborhood development (THD).
7) For the purposes of procedural streamlining and to better focus the
appropriate locations of uses, c.o.n.sider. restricting the types and numbers
of allowable conditional uses. For those uses with performance
standards, make them a limited use whereby they are administratively
permitted subject to written standards.
8) Consider amending Amend the ordinance to include bufferyard
provisions for ensuring improved compatibility between adjacent areas
of different character. The bufferyards must vary according to the
intensity of abutting development, with a range of options (including
combinations of buffer width, plant density, earthen berms, and fencing)
to meet a specified standard of opacity. This would provide adequate
buggering of adjacent uses as well as street corridors. The existing
provisions only specify a 25 foot buffer between multi -family and single
family residential developments without any specification as to the type
of density of landscaping.
9) Consider establishing FstU, !i3" a minimum open space ratio (OSR) within
residential development and landscape surface ration (LSR) within
nonresidential development. The ratios will vary according to the
character of the district. These areas will provide visual buffering and
shade, accommodate recreational amenities, and provide needed space
for stormwater detention.
Below details potential future character districts that could be implemented
if the Citv transitions to a character -based approach to Dlannin
Future Character Districts
Rural. This designation is for areas with large acreages (scattered
homesteads and pasture land) and very large lot developments. It may also
include clustered residential development that is offset by a high
percentage of open space on the overall tract. Rural character is usually
found in areas on the fringe of the City where infrastructure (i.e., curb and
gutter, sewer, etc.) may be less intensive than other areas of the City. Rural
character typically exhibits:
• Wide open landscapes, with no sense of enclosure, and the views to the
horizon are unbroken by buildings.
• Structures are in the background — or invisible entirely as they blend into
the landscape.
• Very high open space ratios and very low building coverage.
• Greater building separation providing privacy and detachment from
neighboring dwellings.
• Much greater reliance on natural drainage systems.
• A more pleasant environment for walking and biking, especially for off-
street trail systems.
Suburban Residential. This designation is for areas that include detached
residential dwellings; planned developments (to provide other housing
types, e.g., attached residential, with increased open space), etc. Suburban
Residential character typically exhibits:
• A high degree of open space maintained on the site.
• Larger lot sizes to allow for larger front yards and building setbacks.
• Greater side separation between homes.
• Less noticeable accommodation of the automobile (especially where
driveways are on the side of homes rather than occupying a portion of
the front yard space, and where garages are situated to the side or rear
of the main dwelling).
• In some case, Suburban Residential can accommodate smaller lot sizes in
exchange for greater open space, with the additional open space
devoted to maintaining the Suburban character and buffering adjacent
properties.
Auto Urban Residential. This designation also includes detached residential
dwellings; attached housing types (subject to compatibility and open space
standards, e.g., duplexes, townhomes, patio homes); planned developments
(with a potential mix of housing types and varying densities, subject to
compatibility and open space standards), etc. Auto Urban Character typically
exhibits:
• Less openness and separation between dwellings compared to Suburban
areas.
• Auto -oriented character (e.g., driveways and front -loading garages
dominate the front yard and facades of homes).
• Uniform front setbacks where
minimal variation in individual house
design can create a monotonous
street environment.
• Lack of variation (sometimes) or
excessive monotony which can be
offset by "antimonotony'
architectural standards, landscaping,
and limitations on subdivision
layouts that are overly
characterized by straight streets and
uniform lot sizes and arrangement.
Traditional Residential. This designation
covers many of the core single- family
residential neighborhoods within East La
Porte. The prevailing lot size allows for
less openness and separation between
homes than in Suburban and Rural residential areas. Traditional Residential
character areas typically exhibit:
• Mature tree canopies; which help to differentiate these areas from Auto -
Urban Residential areas.
• Highly gridded streets, oftentimes with alleys.
• Incremental increases in housing density and lot coverage; enough to
differentiate from corresponding Suburban Residential areas.
Suburban Village. This designation includes mixed use (on single sites and
within individual structures), attached residential dwellings (possi bly
live/work units), commercial retail, office, etc. Rather than linear strips,
these village centers will have much smaller building footprints and
typically cater towards neighborhood conveniences such as drug stores,
professional services, and retail users. Given the expected increases in
population constrained by the limited areas remaining for development, it
is recommended that La Porte consider facilitating the development of
some of the remaining areas as more self-contained, mixed use villages.
Suburban Village character areas typically exhibit:
• High degree of landscape surface than found in Auto -Urban character
areas.
• Pedestrian -oriented setting and more walkable environments.
• Higher site coverage, where a minimum two-story structures are
encouraged.
• Reliance on on -street parking, centralized public parking, and where
feasible, structured parking.
Auto Urban Commercial. Development types include a wide range of
commercial retail and service uses (at varying scales and intensities
depending on the site); office (both large and/or multi -story buildings and
small-scale office uses depending on the site); and public/institutional
areas. Auto -Urban character areas typically exhibit:
• A largely horizontal development pattern.
• A very open environment (but to accommodate extensive surface
parking versus the more prominent green spaces found in Suburban
areas)
• Significant area devoted to vehicular access drives, circulation routes,
surface parking, and loading/delivery areas (making pavement the most
prominent visual feature versus green or open areas). Auto -oriented
character may be enhanced with better building and site design.
Urban Downtown. This character area is different from an Auto -Urban
commercial area in that the buildings are brought to the street and there
is no or very limited on -site parking. Buildings within this district occupy a
large percentage of the site, and front and side yard setbacks must be
built to the property line in order to maintain the characteristics of a
traditional downtown. Downtown character areas typically exhibit:
• Most intensive development character in City.
• Streets framed by buildings with zero/minimal front setbacks.
• Greatest site coverage.
• Minimum two-story structures encouraged.
• Reliance on on -street parking, centralized public parking, and where
feasible, structured parking.
• Public/institutional uses designed of an Urban character.
Business Park. This designation is typically Suburban in character and
primarily is for office, medical, and technology/research uses, but can also
include light industrial (including warehousing/distribution) when well
screened and in buildings with enhanced architectural design. Business
Parks are a good way to attract new companies to the area and could be
an attractive alternative the existing facilities available today. Business
Park character areas are typically grouped in campus style settings and
typically exhibit:
• Reduced site coverage and larger areas of common open space.
• A minimum open space ratio of 20%-30%, which still allows for a sizable
cumulative building footprint since most such developments involve
large sites.
• Extensive landscaping of business park perimeter, and special
streetscaping and design treatments at entries, key intersections, and
internal focal points.
• Development outcomes that exceed City ordinances and development
standards (because they are often controlled by private covenants and
restrictions)
• Site operations that are conducted indoors with no outdoor storage or
display.
Auto -Urban Industrial. La Porte's has been traditionally known as an
industrial City, and as such, there are many industrial areas located in and
around the City which exhibit an Auto -Urban character. Although, these
areas can be enhanced through landscaping and buffering standards, master -
planning via "industrial parks," and optimal site selection. The City's existing
industrial buildings are a mix of older and new brick and metal buildings
scattered throughout the City. Auto -Urban Industrial character areas
typically exhibit:
• Predominantly characterized by large parking and storage areas and
minimal greenspace; although some industrial park developments may
feature more open space and landscaping, regulated signage, screening,
etc.
• Outdoor activity and storage, which should be screened where visible
from public ways and buffered from residential areas. It could also
include certain publicly owned uses (e.g., public works facilities, fleet
maintenance, treatment plants, etc.)
Parks and Open Space. This designation is for the City's park, recreation, and
open space areas and the trail system. Parks are formally developed
recreation areas comprised of public parks, trails, and other improved
recreational (active and passive) or cultural amenities. Open spaces are less
developed natural areas typically characterized by sensitive or unique
environmental features that may or may not be developed. Typically, public
parkland will remain in the public realm in perpetuity with future parkland
acquired to fill the gaps and support new development. Park design,
intensity of development, and planned uses/activities should match the area
character (e.g., Five Points Town Plaza should look different than Pete
Gilliam Park). Parks and Open Space character areas typically exhibit:
• Manicured lawns, parking lots and sidewalks, playgrounds, sports courts
and sports fields, etc.
• Unimproved natural areas or improved to provide limited amenities, e.g.,
parking, trails, bird blinds, etc.
Public/Institutional. This designation includes the City -owned buildings and
facilities (including City Hall and the police and fire stations), as well as other
publicly or privately -owned schools and hospitals, churches and accessory
buildings, public parking lots and structures, and other non -governmental
civic functions (e.g., Chamber of Commerce). Since these facilities occur
throughout the City, they should be designed to be compatible with the
character of the surrounding area. Irrespective of which character area these
facilities are placed, they should still exhibit: