Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-12-01 Regular Meeting• • • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 1, 1982 1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cline at 7:00 P.M. Members of the City Council Present: Mayor Virginia Cline, Councf lpersons John Longley, Ed Matuszak, Kevin Graves, Lindsay Pfeiffer, Deotis Gay, Don Skelton, Linda Westergren Members of the City Council Absent: Norman Malone Members of the City Staff Present: City Manager Jack Owen, City Attorney Knox Askins, City Secretary Betty [Maters, Chief of Police H. F. Freeman, Director of Administrative Services Bob Herrera, Fire Chief Joe Sease, Director of Parks and Recreation Stan Sherwood, Graduate Engineer John Joerns Others Present: Melissa Lestarjette, Bayshore Sun; Frieda Beaty, Baytown Sun; Pam Smith, La Porte Broadcaster; Dave • Corbin, Busch, Hutchison & Associates; 17 interested citizens 2. The invocation was given by Councilperson Skelton. 3. Council considered the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the La Porte City Council held November 17, 1982. A motion was made by Councilperson Matuszak to pass and approve t e minutes as presented. Second by Councilperson Graves. The motion car- ried, 8 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer, Gay, Skelton, [Vestergren and Mayor Cline Nays: None 4. Glenda Patton has been called out of town and could not appear tonight to discuss the "Truck Ordinance." 5. Mr. Ervin Wright, 505 South First Street, was not present to address the Council. 6. Council considered the recommendation by ~.usch, Hutchison & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, in the contract award for the rebid of Contract IV, Rehabilitation of Sanitary Sewer Collection System, EPA Project C-481176-03-0. Dave Cor-- bin answered questions from the Council concerning the experi- • ence and reputation of the low bidder, Reliance Construction, Inc. • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council December 1, 1982, Page 2 City Manager Owen brought Council up to date on the financial aspects of the sewer bond funds, informing Council of the following: I. Possible Recovery of Funds from Bonding Co. Total Amount of original contract* $776,546.31 *Based on estimate by Busch, Hutchison & Associates of $826,082.81 less $49,536.50 which is the amount of proposed Change Order #1 - not approved Balance outstanding on original contract 165,876.20 Original contract amount 776,546.31 Less amount of work completed 610,670.11 165,876.20 Amount necessary to complete original scope 488,522.50 • of work Bid by Reliance Construction, Inc. 552,392.50 Less items 53-68 of bid proposal 63,870.00 (Change Order #1 items) 488,522.50 Possible recovery of funds from bonding co. Am;bunt necessary to complete 488,522.50 original scope of work Less balance outstanding on 165,876.20 original contract 322,646.30 II. Funds Available for Completion of Re-Bid 1979 Sewer Bond Fund 25~ x 735,965.90 (originally set aside for 183,9,91.4.8 Contract IV) 25$ x 610,670.11 (actual completed work -152,667.53 Contract IV) Available to reprogram into Contract IV re-bid 31,323.95 Approx. current contingency 1979 sewer-bond fund 499,7,98.58 (see attached sheets) Total available funds 1979 Sewer Bonds TOTAL 531,1,21.58 • • • r~ LJ Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council December 1, 1982, Page 3 EPA Grant Agreement Funds 75~ x 735,965.90 (originally. programmed) 75$ x 610,670.11 (amt. used by Tinker/ Lovelace) $551,974.43 458,002.58 93,971.85 Note: As of 12/1/82 there is some EPA contingency funds which might be approved by TDWR for use on Contract TV re-bid ($103,000+). These funds, because they have not been approved by TDWR, are not included in this analysis. City of La Porte worst possible case Contract Award $552,392.50 EPA Funds Available 93,971.85 Possible Cost to City 458,4 0.65 • Which will nearly exhaust the 1979 Sewer Bond Fund leaving +$72,700.00 Knox Askins, City Attorney, advised Council of the law suit filed by the bonding company. A motion was made by Council~erson Gay to award the bid for reha i nation of tie sanitary sewer collection system to Re lance Construction, Inc., in a amount o 5'', .50-if t is meets wit t e approva o" Sears an 'Burns, Attorneys at Law. Secon y Counci person Pfeiffer. T e motion carrle , 8 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer, Gay, Skelton, Westergren and Mayor Cline Nays: None 7. Consent Agenda: Items B, C, and D were removed by Council fox discussion, therefore, each item was discussed and .voted on separately. • A. Council considered the recommendation 'of Director of Public Works Jerry Hodge for contract awards on bids for water and sewer supplies. All awards are based on low bid by line item for Section I and V and by low total in Sections II, III and IV. A motion was. made by Councilperson Westergren to award the bids as recommended by Hodge. (Bid tabula- tions and recommendations a part of official minutes.) • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council December 1, 1982, Page 4 Second by Councilperson Skelton. The motion carried, 8 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer, Gay, Skelton, Westergren and Mayor Cline Nays: None B. Council considered the recommendation of Director of Parks and Recreation Stan Sherwood in awarding a bid for renova- tion of the municipal swimming pool. A motion was made by Councilperson Gay to award the bid to Cahill and Stone in a amount of 20,600.00 an furt er directe a Cit Manager to retain a qua i ie inspector to check on the ~o as it is one.. Secon y Councilper- son Skelton. T e motion carried, 8 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer, Gay, Skelton, Westergren and Mayor Cline Nays: None • C. Council considered a resolution approving the issuance of bonds by the City of La Porte Industrial Development Cor- poration to finance a project for Bayshore National Bank of La Porte. A motion was made b Councilperson Ga to pass and approve Resolution No. 2- 9 as presence or the Bays ore National Ban project. Motion was amen ed to state "pending approval y t e La Porte Industrial Board" by Councilperson Matuszak. .This met with Council- person Gay's approval. Second by Councilperson Westergren. The motion carried, 7 ayes and l nay. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer, Gay, Skelton, Westergren Nays: Mayor Cline D. Council considered a resolution approving the issuance of bonds by the City of La Porte Industrial Development Cor- poration to finance a project for Trangalee Development, Inc. (La Porte Plaza). Councilperson Westergren stated she would refrain from discussion or voting on this resolution slue ~ a ps.~se~-16~ A motion was made by Councilperson Graves to pass and ado t Reno cation 2-20 as presence to finance t e Tranga ee Development, Inc.','pro'je'ct. Second Councilperson Skelton. ,z q~;e.; • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council December 1, 1982, Page 5 The motion carried, 7 ayes, 0 nays, 1 abstain. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer Gay, Skelton and Mayor Cline Nays: None Abstain: Councilperson Westergren 8. Council considered the recommendation by Graduate Engineer John Joerns to oversize an 8 inch water line being installed along Underwood Road from North L Street to the Trammel Crow Distribution Center site on SH 225. The estimated cost to go from an 8 inch line to a 12 inch line may approach $7.0,000.00. A motion was made by Councilperson Graves to authorize the oversizing of a Un erwoo Road water line from to 2 inches and appropriating t e un s rom t e Water an Sewer Tmprove- ment fun Second by Counci person S elton. T e motion car- ried, 6 ayes and 2 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Graves, Pfeiffer., Gay, ,Skelton, Westergren • Nays: Councilpersons Matuszak and Mayor Cline 9. Council considered the H. F. Freeman to enter Houston-Galveston Area Police Department at a man pointed out that t] Furys would afford the budgeted funds. recommendation of Chief of Police into an interlocal agreement with the Council to purchase vehicles for the very good savings for the City. Free- ze purchase of the 1983 Plymouth Grand City a savings of $1T,608.18 of the After some discussion concerning the bid process in thin par- ticular instance, City Manager Owen recommended the City take full advantage of this bid and purchase the budgeted vehicles for Fire Suppression and Fire Prevention. A motion was made by Councilperson Gay to enter into the Inter- local Agreement with Houston-Galveston. Area Council for the purc ase o 9 P ymout Grand Fury, cblice un~:ts .4 a~.rol units detective cars 1 Fire SuppressLOn I Fire Preven- tion at a price o~~~13 per unit. Seco~Icn y Council- person S e ton. T e motion Carrie ,ayes and O nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Longley, Matuszak, .Graves, Pfeiffer, Gay, Skelton, Westergren and Mayor Cline Nays: None • _ _, , W- . ~ ~ -,~.f-,~. _ .~ ,.rc,R,. ,A..,, ,, _ • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council December 1, 1982, Page 6 10. Administrative Reports: City Manager Owen reported .the' medical insurance study is complete and the City will be bidding medical insurance by sometime in January. Those bids will be awarded no later than March to meet the expiration date of the present policy. Owen asked for any comments on the activity report prepared for the Council last week. 11. Council Action: Councilperson Longley stated he found the activity report interesting and useful. He asked that the Truck Ordinance be placed on the December 29 workshop agenda for discussion. Councilperson Matuszak requested a review of the flood zone maps the City has recently received. Fie asked that a clear statement as to the authority of the Board of Adjustment be written by legal counsel. • Councilperson Graves asked that someone check out the business located in the 600 block of North 9th S treet; he had received numerous complaints. He asked that consideration of changing workshops back to Wednesday nights. be considered. at the Decem- ber workshop. Graves requested an executive session on a legal matter with City Attorney Askins present. Councilperson Skelton recommended the Council prepare and pass a resolution supporting the property owners along Park Street and Garfield in an attempt to get something done to the dan- gerous ditches along those streets. Councilperson Westergren requested an executive .session for personnel matters. Mayor Cline announced that Santa Claus would arrive in La Porte Thursday, December 2 at 6:30 P.M. She read a letter of commenda- tion for the La Porte Police Department and Police Chief Herbert F. Freeman. 12. The Council adjourned into executive session at 8:23 P.M. Council returned to the Council table at 10:10 P.M. 13. There being no further business to come before the Council, .the meeting was duly adjourned at 10:12 P.M. • • Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council December 1, 1982, Page 7 Respectfully submitted: tt T. Waters City Secretary Passed & Approved this the 15th day of December, 198 . . Vi inia Cline, Mayor • • • • MEMORANDUM Novembe r 12 , 19 8 2 T0: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Jack Owen SUBJECT: Master Plan As you are aware, funds are included in the budget to prepare a Master Plan for the City of La Porte. Since La Porte is a growing city, now is an opportune time to prepare a Master Plan to guide the Council and staff in planning for the future. As we discuss the need for a Master Plan, it may be wise for us to review some of the subjects that should be addressed in such a plan. The items listed below is by no means a com- plete list of everything that should be included. 1. Population projections • 2. Land use - such as public building, parks, other uses covered by zoning, etc. 3. Projected water system including source, distribu- tion-system, transmission mains, future usage, etc. 4. Wastewater system including future treatment plant requirements, collection system by watershed, etc. 5. Transportation system including rubber tire, air, rail and water. Such a plan should include a major thoroughfare plan. 6. Storm water drainage plan 7. Five year capital improvements plan with ten and twenty year projections. Such improvement plan should be updated on a timely basis. All special studies such as Airport Master Plan, water and wastewater system studies, drainage study, etc., would be utilized by the party preparing the Master Plan. The staff recommends that a Request for Proposals be author- ized so that the Council can retain a consultant to prepare a Master Plan. Jack Owen • • az. B~J~~I, HUTCHISON & ASSOCIATES, iNC. CONSULTINGENGINEERS 1107 FLEETWOOD DRIVE BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 PHONE (713) 422-8213 3333 EASTSIDE, SUITE 265 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 (713) 523-2367 November 16, 1982 City of La Porte P. 0. Box 1115 La Porte, TX 77571 f~- ATTN: Jack Owen, City Manager CONTRACT AWARD RECONIl`4ENDATION, :tEBID OF CONTRACT IV - REHABILITATION OF SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEt1, E.P.A. PROJECT C-481176-03-0 The low bidder on the ref erenced project was Reliance Construction, Inc., with a bid of $552,392.50. Since this contractor was unknown to us prior to the rebidding of this project, his background and ref erences have been thoroughly investigated. Although Reliance Construction, Inc., has no previous experience in the construction of similar facilities, the company now employs the former employees of Moon Construction. Moon Construction was the minority business enterprise (MBE) subcontractor to Tinker Industr ies/Jesse Lovelace (A Joint Venture) on the original project and is experienced in rehabilitation type work. • The City of Houston, City of Bellaire, and City of Toledo, Ohio have given favorable responses as to the performance and quality of work done by Reliance Construction, Inc. When Moon Construction was working on the original project as a subcontractor, they performed good work up until the time the prime contractor abandoned the project. With good reports on Reliance Construction, Inc., and previous good experience with Moon Construction, it is anticipated that Reliance Construction, Inc., will do a satisfactory job for the City of La Porte. Therefore, it is our recommendation that the contract for this project be awarded to Reliance Construction, Inc., of Houston, Texas on the basis of their low bid. Sincerely, ~~. ~ ~~, David A. Corbin, P. E. DAC/ j m C: /~,:, ~ ~^ ~~ ~! . • • • •~ • Bu~7~1~1, HUTCHISON & ASSOCIA~'ES. ~NC• CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1107 FLEETWOOD DRIVE BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 PHONE (713) 422-8213 3333 EASTSIDE, SUITE 283 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 (7131 523-2367 J November 15, 1982 City of La Porte P. 0. Box 1115 La Porte, TX 77571 ATTN: Mr. Jack Owen City Manager. STATUS OF THE MAIN LA PORTE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT As of this writing the new plant ~s treating all of the city's waste water. The Fairmont Park plant influent was diverted about 3 weeks ago and the old main plant flow was added last week. The average daily flow is running about 1.8 million gallons per day. The quality of the plant effluent has been meeting the permit standards until last week when the solids in the eff luent has exceeded the permissible amount. This condition occurred because of some problems with the sludge transf er system. The problem was cleared last • Thursday and the plant should be running normally in a few days. Regarding the completion of the plant, we have been working with the Contractor on a lengthy punch list. While the Contractor has been willing, his actual performance has fallen off considerably in the past month. We are meeting with him this week to urge some concentrated effort and get the punch list ~.tems cleared. The only mayor item left for work is the belt press and its peripheral equipment. It is to be .made ready next week at which time the plant should have produced enough sludge to operate the system for a trial run. Most other items are minor and do not affect the operation of the plant. for your information the current punch list is attached. Two items included lit the. electrical list are Change Order No. 5 pieces of equipment which have not yet Been 3:nstalled . If we are successful in getting the Contractor to put forth some effort the plant should ~e ready for acceptance t,!ithin 3 weeks. me tc son, ^ . a~~z/3m Attachment • LJ • PUNCH LIST LA PORTE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT November 15, 1982 1. Double doors into MCC room of Operations Building do not fit properly and leak water from rain to inside. 2. Two lockers for women's rest room. 3. Touch up spots on men's shower. 4. Install lift station ventilation fan. 5. Chlorine gas pressure gage in W-T chlorinator console does not work. 6. ~~1 Blower has problem. Belts squeal when turned on especially when another blower is running. 7. Finish site work beside clarifiers and have fence replaced. 8. General site work and shaping of drainage ditches. Need 8" diameter or 12" diameter drains under two side walks to facilitate drainage. Need drainage work around chlorination basin, at back door of operations building, and between shop and belt press buildings. 9. Sidewalks at chlorination basin and at ~2 clarifier need to be raised. 10.' Adjust wheel on sluice gate between influent chamber and south chamber. It rubs on frame. 11. Stencil identification on lines as required by specifications. Also attach metal identification tag per specifications. 12. Complete grouting work in large electrical pull boxes. 13. Repair M.H, adjacent to chlorination building. 14. Handicapped rails in toilet stalls as required. 15. Install proper grease fittings on sludge pump hydraulic system drive motors. 16. Leak in underground process water system beneath sidewalk next to headworks. 17. Hydrogritter cyclone not working properly. It doesn't separate enough water and floods hydrogritter. • 18. Need backflow valve installed in pad drain adjacent to hydrogritter. ~-~~„ -mss, -... ..v • • :- ~ _;_ Page 2 'Punch List - La Porte Sewage Treatment Plant - Mechanical • 19. A/C in Operations Building won't work on heating cycle. 20. Roof leaks Operations Building and Press Building. 21. Get belt press mechanically ready to run. Check polymer pumps for operation. 22. Try removing grout between basin wall and splash plate on rotors, downstream only, to let accumulated water and sludge flow out. 23. Repair broken concrete in at least one location. Walk to .~1 clarif ier. 24. Install pressure gage on hydropneumatic tank. • U ~ • PUNCH LIST LA PORTS SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT November 15, 1982 Electrical 1. Schedule on all electrical panels must be corrected to reflect actual control. 2. Furnish "as builts" of complete plant, both buildings and yard wiring. 3. Furnish wiring diagrams of MCC-A and MCC-B. 4. Get controls of belt press system to operate properly. Sludge transfer pumps must operate independently of press. Remote speed controls are working backwards. 5. Recheck lift station level float switches. They are not at the proper elevations and may not be hanging in the proper sequence. 6. ~~l clarifier scum airlift solenoid switching is not working on automatic. 7. ~~1 sludge pump motor has damaged cooling fan and must be replaced. • g, Install lightening arrestor. 9. Install single phase protection device. • T0: J. Owe DATE: November 18, 1982 FROM: H SUBJECT: .Bids - Contract for Water and Sewer Supplies I have reviewed the attached bid tabulations for Annual Bids on Water and Wastewater supplies. All awards are based upon low bid by line item in Section I and V; and by low total in Sections II,_III and IV. Annual fixed price contracts will be signed with each vendor upon approval by La Porte City Council. I fully concur with all recommendations made within and request that bid awards be made promptly. • • ~/ __ I c_ cA C7 ~-+ 7d (.~ r+ ~l ~~ N N O G O O ~ ~ H O~ O u, w 9"' n [7 • N• ~C [ ~ ~ N K C to O H p N iw-t FO-+ O H O ~ ''i ~ v, w w a F --~ ~C G d ~ n~ ~ N y 0 Q, ~ r 'r C/1 O O O ~ ~ b C/1 H vOi n ~ ~ ~• N y O' ~ N• • 1 w ~ N ~~jyy ~ t~7 O Vl ~ N• N ~"„ rt n N 9 • N 1-h O o ~ • H ~ r H F~ ~ O ~ H + H °' z w . ~cn-cn<n<nv> a O 00 00 lJ1 I-~ V In N In ~O W V W L~000 l!i O~ In lJ~ O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O H H z ~ H ~z ~ H Ch 7d • ~ v °z n ~„ o ~ w z N ~ H H • "' z 0 ~ ~ 9 . t n H am O C ] H C~ 1 H f~ t'~ 0 (D ~ O ~ v ~ O ~ v, H x ~ z I-+ H CJ O V ~c w ~ N O ~ • O O ~ O~ O O I O C ~ w ~ w ~" n ~ ° z ~ n ~ o • w z ~s H O~ H ",d N ; z C o H n y V ~ H o ,~ z 0 0 ~'~ a ~r~ , rr ,b , w „~ ~ m n > ~ µ x F, ~ ;~ ~ r7 r--. z _~ ~n ~ o Z • i C rt a • ~, r ~ I~ f I n /7 ~i ---- 111 _ ~ ~ . , -r _~ , • CITY OF LA PORTS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM T0: Jerry Hodge - Director of Public Works DATE: November 16, 1982 FROM: J. Ray / SUBJECT: Annual Bi s - Water and Sewer Supplies Attached you will find a tabulation of annual bids for the purchase of Water and Sewer Supplies. Six bid packages were mailed October 21, 1982 and four sealed bids were returned. Awards to successful vendors will be in the form of annual fixed price contracts for specified material. Bid specifications were divided into five sections this year. Section I, Brass Fittings; and Section V, PVC and Polyethylene Products; were awarded by line item due to the expensive nature of each item and the high volume of usage anticipated during Fiscal year 1982-'83. Sections II, III and IV were awarded on the basis of low total ner section. • Award recommendations by section are as follows: Section I: Brass Fittings (A) Items #1,2,5,12,13,14,17,37,38,39,41,46,48,49, 51,52,55,56, and 57 award to the Rohan Co. on the basis of low bid per item. Section I: Brass Fittings (B) Items #3,4,6-11,15,16,18-36,40,42-45,47,50,53 award to Golden Triangle and Water Supply, Inc. on the basis of low bid per item. Section II: Tapping Saddles: Award to the Rohan Co. on the basis of low total bid, 11,703.28. Section III: Clamps, Couplings, and Pipe Repair Products: Award to Utility Supply Co. on the basis of low total bid, $9,027.98. Section IV: Rubber Adaptors and Miscellaneous Supplies: Award to Golden Triangle Pipe and Water Supplies on the basis of law total bid, $9,031.76. Section V: PVC and Polyethylene Products: (A) Items #1-3,7-9, and 15 award to Utility Supply Co. on the basis of low bid per item. Section V: PVC and Polyethylene Products: (B) Items #4-6,10-14 award to. Golden Triangle Pipe and Water Supplies, Inc. on the basis of low bid per item. If you have any questions concerning the above recommendations please advise. cc : Bob Herrera ~z I ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ti ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ } ..~~_, ~~ --~3 , . `4' `~ .~"~ ~ f "~ r ~r ~~ =~ ~ 2 ~I ~, ~~ ` v~~ ~ _ ~~~~ ~ ~t's~ ~/ ~ 3( ~ 3 _ ~, ~ ; ~ . ff r°~ , ~ - ~ - ~.. << ~ ~ ~ ~ $~ ~~ . z~~ 1~~~~~ ((~~ ~c ~ ~~ ~~ ~-yy ~ ~ ~ j _ _. r~ ~ -~~ ~¢ ~ ~~~ ~~ asp i.~C % ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _G , .; ~ ~ ~G ~~ ~ 46 ...~ ll. y3 da. ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ .mss _ 1 ~ p ~~ ~ - ~~ ~~ 7 ~~ ~- ~ ,~ {e ~~ tea.. ~~.- ~~r) ~- ~ S""" ~ . r, - - T -r i - ~g. 3r~r ~ ~ P~.~.~ ~`~ ~ .,~.~ ~1 ~~ ~ ~. a~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~,. ~r ~ _ ~, 3. ~r~, ~..e ~-Q~,~-- C~~ - ~ . ~~ ~ 1. a ~ ~ - ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~~ z ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~` ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~' ,- ~ 1•' a.ar ~' ~. ~ ~' ~ 3 ~i" ~ ~ ~ .~la 1.~~ ~ . ~~.01 3 ~) ~ ~5p.a ~3 . ~ 0. 36 c~. a U ~d ~ .~0 ~ . ~1 ~• f u - ~,~- ~ ~. 3 ~a.~o ~'sr~f ~ 3.0~ ~.~~ l~" It~ "~1 " ~ ~~ ` s R ~-/~l ~~ /.f0 ~3.'l~ ~ 10.55 l~P. plx (.~. ~- td ~~~~t ~~/' '1 S '~~ ~s~ C~ ~ k . Ll' .' ~ ~ w «'I °" ~t ~ ~ .~ ~ [~~] aa l-~1 Q~ p, a •1~ _ ~ - r `f 3i~"_ ~~.3a ~`~.sr ~ .30~ ~a-~~ 4 4 ~r ~a1 ~ ~lo.~ ~ , !i•~ 5~-. ~ ~, 1 ft ~ ~,5~ ~ ~ ~ , 3'~ .~~ ~s- ~ d ~~ x ~ ~, u ~~ ~' ~.s-~ as . ~ a~~ H3 ~a r. ~ -~~~ ~ .~ , . a ~~.~.; ~~ ~~ • __._,_ 6 O ~. r v (I ~ ~ - ~ i~ ~ ~ 13 _r3 ~' ~ . r ~ f r, !. ~~ << ~ ~~C~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ I.ra ~' ~r~~ ~' 1d,9 c , ~ rI~' t~ - tK:-`Sty ~ ~ ~ ~ ~•~.~ g ~r~~l~ u ~ ' - ~~ ~ ,~3 ~.6~ r 3~ ~ ~.a t1 ~~ r_. ~ ~ ~`~ °~~1.3~ ~`~. aq ~G. a i ~ i r -- ~ . v t - C~) C~ a . a (~ a . Frs ~ s~. t~t,t9.3s' .f ./'~' ~~~a - ~~ ASS=Sc ~ ~(o~,! ~,3-3~ ~13.eo ~ ~ ,~% ~ ~ ao_ ~ ~ :~ ad~~~ ~ o-a~? ~~ `'~3~~ ~ ~~ ~ a~~a ~ .~ ~ao.5~ ~ o.~ 1. t~~1 ~~ ~` ~ . D ~ ~ '" .F,a ~~ / t // 11 m 1 (~ M !yam/ •""'- / ((~~ rV~ ~ Q 46 i } .. I ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - i~' . _ v J ~`' ~ r c ~; ~', .~ ,.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ ~ a u ~~ ~~ /~ A - _ 0 .~ ~ ~ r `~~C~ ~ ~ __ ~ ~r . ~1 3_ 3-c a•~ISXI~ ~C .c I~~•do ~y•~h .00 ~$-~~ ~(~ - 0 ~( (0 1`.r.e. ~C?_6o .~~ 3,0.1'- e~ 3_~ - ~,a~ ~ (~ r".c~.r ~, :~3_to 3.03 •:~ dd.~g 1K. _ ~ _ .a~i ~ y I".c _c . rp 1 ~l-Qa a ~ 6~~Si~ ~~.G3 ~ ~ N - 'S.SM X l .~ r.C ,C . j0 ~A ~~7 30;'~~ 30.00 F T ~j, (~i ' <d ( 4 j1~ ~•S(, 46 <~~. G-~~~- ~~~~Ix ~~~ i=-.e.~ ra~ ~ -duo ;~ a~~g~ as-s L. 023. ~,G ~ _ ,Fr-z - r".c c. :~ 3_.(o U_3s" ~3.a~ ~a.~ ~G. ~. 4 . P X io -'. c ~ ~ 5 -F o 3~,~W 3~ . 56 3~. ~,d~J~ 1~.~~,-r~o ~=.c,c_ r3} '~,d5 ~~-53 36.E ~ ~G.~to ~~ ~ i'~ ~.~ iiC.~C. ~~/• ~/~ ~'OW ~ 1•rIS ~r0 . ll.r~ - .~I~ X ~•~~ .e. ~ 'S. ~ '~~~.~`~ ~S~oq 5'x.3 ~G ~--e~ I aJ~, o r~ ~ ,~ ~~ . J • ~r ~ ~ t t, - ~ 3G~se ~ .a ~.~ ~ ~~~ o y -.e ,C, d d 3~~ ~3.~0 , .~o ~~ r.~,~ a o ~~ ~.~.~3 _ . 13,30 - f x{.30 ~IS F,c .c . (2, ~.eo ~ 3 .~i ~-©- ~~ ~~ 1~ ~ ~~d~ /~ ~~ ~~C '~ « ~ ~ .e 3 ~. - '. W'Q~ o.~ .._ • ~_ aq .~ ~ _ ~. ~ `~ d J. ~o . 8 3 ~ I6 .68' u ~ ~ ~S- Ala o . . S 15 -c~ ~ _~' ~ `` "v~ `""'~ lJ ~ I~r~ 31 ~~" ~ . a ~ -d ~. o0 6 ~ c u '`I ~ C~ (p~.0e ~ d ~'~aL 3.IH . ~~'~o a.s a~ oa. S~' ~~ _. _ _n~.,-.._. ~7 . a: ~~ 1.:: Y ~~ 4t ~ . ~~s-- ~ ~,.-.inf. ~/y~ n ~ I tl ~ ~kic,- (' _ l ( ~ R ~ K ~ ~ r ~ - ~ ~r UC,- c~ (lC. ~ ~ 3~~ ~~,~ Sl 3o S ~~ i3 '~ ~ ~o a.t~o oq J .~ _ ~ , , 0 ~ i~a~,~ (~(o ,_ ~ ~ (. to ~ ~ , a ~ ~~ ~ ~ s ._. _ 0 4 d' ~ 0 -~ __,-__ - ~~~~ v Pic ~. .~ • ~~ ~V .~ ` ,. n C ,~-~-- r ~ 3. °~ ~ 1 ~ ~ / 1 ~ ...~N~. ~ u 5, ~~~ QQ~ ~ ~ t ,~ 1 t r) ~ O~ ~U t ` ~- ' ' ~ a ~j 1 ~ ' 1 ~ .d ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ t0 . 1 ~ ~ . ~ p( '1 r . ~ ~t p :no 2 . ~ . ~~ ~. ~. " ~ U C. ~~tRAA1n ~ , oo _ 0 ~ 3(}~" ~~Jc ~ ' ~ I .~ o ~ . ~o ~ y3, ~' 3.8c. ~ ~ -Go ~ (~f ~ ti`s o~ 'a _t~ a_o r ~.i3 ' ~5 ~~ S - ~ ` ~ '~~ ~ •~7r ~ GS s '1~ .oo ~ 1~ .0 1~( •~L • CITY OF LA PORTS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Owen,. City Manager DATE: October 29, 1982 FROM: Stan Sherwood, Director Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Renovating La Porte Municipal Swimming Pool On Friday, October 22, we received one (1) bid for renovating La Porte Pool. The one bid was in the amount of $24,6®®.00 from Cahill and Stone located in Flossmoor, Illinois. The budgeted amount for replastering the pool was in the amount of $17,328.00, which is approximately $3,272.00 over the budgeted amount. In the 1982-83 Capital Fund under Park Land and Field Improvement there is approximately $7,000.00 contingency set aside. It is my recommendation that $3,272.00 be taken from that amount tp cover the cost of the bid. -"-~"- Attached is the copy of the bid proposal and also a list of pools in the United States that have been replastered by Cahill & Stone. • • . .i' ~ • 1] In ]'1l:)I>t1S:11, • ] (1 C;I'CY OF LA PORT. 'i'...'r1.. b«+. .. ~ A ']'0: }10^IU]L1RLE Pi<1YOR AND Ci)CPICIL Flt0"I: CU!~1]"~.'.!~.' E .. _. . -- C1;Y OP' LA I'OKTE ~:L`DI'.!•,::::; T.:1 PuP.TE, 'P)/!{.AS CITY ~ `>'!'.~". ,; ^__ _,__------ -----__ - . ~* - M J October 7, 1982 :; ~ .., I ~ UI?SCRI P'T] U`J ., ll'ii I', c~ i I'!1 I C:1: ~ T(''~" , ' ; I I 1 ' Pool Renovator as per attached. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~, • ~ ,~ ~, , ~~ '~ i ~ ~! ' ' ! ~ ~ ao I,~ ;' ~ ' : ; S%~ C~~ ~ ~ j , ' i ~ I ,~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 "; i ~, ! i i I'i' Iti L':':D1:itST00ll ANU ACK]:F.D 'THA'I' 'I'1i1: AI;OVE 1)i? CR 1 !;c:!1, I'('I?';, ~1t.7'ii:IA[., ANU/Oi: T1~t~] P:;1:`J'i', SHe11.], CAKIiY 1'i?'t•: STAi4Ur11LU WARIt.1iv'1'1' Of' '] l{!: ~?i~~!l1i'ACi'Gi"'!~, :i);n NE D[:T. t\ :R 1:11 U:t S1'1'I: lip ACCORDAtICE: I•:I'I'N "1'itl: A'1"I'ACIII:U SPI:CIFl~;A'l'!c:;!S i`!, L`AYS: }~UI' 'I'1!!' 1!;~UI:RST`t:?!I:D C:L]Z'1'I1~II?.. 1'TfA'i' TH1S P,IU PR1C1: COi,'1':11.^!!:J Ii2 't'ill: 1~C)I:E(;UI!•;(; 1•'i:CPt):,.~.1. :I:1S !tE!?:v /f1 E_IjJ(LLY CHI•:CP;E NU T ' SU!;!•I1'1'TEU 1N Ul'i'i,I C;:~7'!: !,S CORK(?Cf r1N1) I~ I:::'.L ~ I NN~~i~ .. ` ~ Dr ._ _ , _ --- _ • C~ SUGGESTED PROCEDURES FOR RENOVATING A SWIMMING POOL UTILIZING FIBERGLASS AS THE • RENOVATIVE MEDIUM. Quality assurance: A. Qualification of Contractor: Contractor shall: 1. Have a minimum of five (5) years experience in the application of fiber- glass surfacing to swimming pools. 2. Have a minimum of five (5) large swimming pools (regulation A.A.U. short or long course) that have been fiberglass surfaced by the contractor, and which have been in operation with the fiberglass lining/surfacing for a period of time not less than five (5) years. B. Qualification of workmen: 1. Contractor shall use only qualified and thoroughly trained and experi- enced craftsmen, completely familiar with the materials and methods specified. 2. Contractor shall personally supervise work or shall provide a competent person acceptable to owner who shall be present at all times during execution of work and who shall be thoroughly trained and experienced in materials and methods specified. Products: • Materials: A. Chopped glass fibers for reinforcement of the fiberglass mixture shall be of a diameter and length appropriate for the application and as manufactured by Potters Industries, PPG, Owens or~equal. B. Resin, pastes, additives, primers and top coats shall be of the type specifically formulated and developed for use in swimming pools, such as "Selection from PPG", or equal in quality. Standards: A. Applied fiberglass surface shall be capable of withstanding temperatures as low as Oo Fahrenheit, have a tensile strength of 14,000 psi, and flexural strength of not less than 23,000 psi. B. Mixture of fiberglass shall be based on a glass to resin ration of 28.2 ~ percent with an application thickness of not less than one-eighth (1/8") inch throughout the entire pool surface. C. Caulking: Shall be an approved poly-sulfide, thiokol or comparable product and be compatible with existing expansion joint materials and fi7aerglass materials to be used. D. Expansion joints: Shall be bridged with reinforcing fabric such as C-Flex ribbed fiberglass cloth, applied with a polyester resin tack coat to hold in place prior to application of fiberglass coating. • oz ~'_ _ _.. - _. ...~~.;YbJ+A.dfPllC'~E`C+ti:y pc .~. .1_..., :.. f.^,; 'T+n .C91'$,R~'1:a~Lk4~hf+ ., i'.~9~'lt..~kd ~. iv:: - .... ll Pik, 4a.s,'.i w2~+ln., a~~ketri.~ _ rtft~m: •A..w~vx._ + • • Page 2 • E. Cleaning surface prior to application: Shall be accomplished with either sand blasting, acid washing or water blasting or all of these individu- ally or in combination. Contractor shall have option of cleaning surface in best manner to assure positive adhesion of fiberglass re- surfacing. Execution: Preparation: A. Clean all surfaces to be fiberglassed, existing and repaired, with appropriately diluted solution of acid to remove all rust spots, stains, oils, algae growth or other fozeign materials from areas not completely covered with initial cleaning. Rinse and neutralize with clean potable water and completely remove all residue and liquid from pool bottom or surge gutter or drains. B. Carefully check resulting surfaces of the pool and surge gutter for loose or porous spots or patches of the concrete surface. Repair, seal, and prime any areas which are deficient and not capable of receiving fiberglass coating. C. Undercut and thoroughly clean all underwater light nitches, mechanical fittings, water inlets, recessed bottom drains, and pool anchor devices to insure good adhesion of all materials to be applied under Work of this section. D. Inspect condition of existing and new caulking in both bottom and side wall expansion joints of pool to determine that joints are sound and secure. Use additional caulking, filler or fiberglass reinforcement to level joints with adjacent surfaces. E. At existing and new structural joints or cracks, carefully prime and place reinforcing of 12" wide strips of fiberglass, thoroughly impregnated and rolled tightly into place over the adjacent surfaces. Allow proper curing time but not less than 24 hours. Application: A. Bonding coat: Apply bonding coat-which will act as a primer-to all surfaces which are to be fiberglassed. B. Fiberglass: Apply fiberglass material to a minimum thickness of one- eighth (1/8") inch with the approved integral color using spray equip- ment specifically designated for this type of work. Such as manufactured ~1, by Grayco, or an approved equal pressure method of application, under appropriate environmental and atmospheric conditions of humidity, temperature, etc.. C. Accurately interface with the finish planes of existing surfaces and items, or those installed by other trades. D. Where non-slip surfaces for steps or stairs are required, apply glass beads, non-friable frit, Monterey 100 mesh sieve sand or other approved material compatible with the fiberglass mixture to produce a safe, non- . skid submerged surface for bathers with bare feet. Q3 !•.If. _.. _:. ~.~Y I!^h P€ ...::~: ,:~..if.S.dN3,.~, ,::: x:i .~ .. 't v.. :;..1 ... _~ i.... ~ .y ,.:. e':,,F??f1iT1~S1h~ulfmm»aolleWgYMw-+.m>~~_ . - • ~ • • Page 3 Curing: A. Inspection: After the curing period, the contractor shall inspect all surfaces for deficiencies. All sharp splinters or hairs at curbs, ramps, steps, gutters, fixtures and other mechanical devices within the pool shall be removed and all surfaces shall be hand sanded until all surfaces are smooth and uniform throughout the entire swimming pool. B. Markings: After sanding and touch up, apply final racing lane and wall targets using approved colors and methods of application. C. Re-install: Reset all hardware, apparatus or mechanical devices removed during the fiberglass application. If ladders and rails have been sent out for re-chroming, it is the, duty of that contractor to have all re-chromed parts ready and waiting for installation. Warranty: Before final pay out, the 5 Year Warranty-from date of completion- will be given designated individual connected with pool. Upon completion of work contractor shall remove all scaffolds, appliances, and other equipment, and all debris from premises. • .. t ~y ,.~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE CITY OF LA PORTE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO FINANCE A PROJECT FOR BAYSHORE NATIONAL BANK OF LA PORTE; APPROVING SAID PROJECT AND HARING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WHEREAS, by resolution the City Council (the "Governing Body") of the City of La Porte, Texas (the."Unit"), authorized and approved the creation of the City of La Porte Industrial Development Corporation (the Corporation ) as a nonprofit industrial development corporation under Article the provisions of the Development Corporation Act of 1979, 5190.6, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, as amended (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82-11, passed and approved July 7, 1982, the Unit designated certain eligible blighted areas ("EBAs") within which certain commercial projects can be financed pursuant to the terms of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Act and the rules of the Texas Industrial Commission promulgated thereunder (the "Rules") provide that commercial projects may be financed if they are within or immediately adjacent to an eligible blighted area as determined by a city and if the city has . approved the project and made the determinations and findings required by the Rules; and WHEREAS, by resolution adopted on December 1, 1982, the Governing Body approved an Agreement to Issue Bonds between the Corporation and Bayshore National Bank of La Porte which Agreement to Issue Bonds authorized the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds by the Corporation to finance the cost of commercial facilities (the "Project") to accomplish the specific public purpose for which the Corporation was created and which Agreement to Issue Bonds was approved by resolution of the Corporation on August 10, 1982; and WHEREAS , the Project is located within the EBA and the User has represented to the Unit and to the Corporation that (1) the User has no present intention of disposing of or abandoning the Project, (2) the User has no present intention of directing the Project to a use other than the purposes represented to the Unit and (3) the User will not, during the life of the bonds, direct the Project to a use not authorized within the EBA; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Rules, a public hearing was held on this date by the Governing Body, after notice thereof having been posted • .~ • • • in accordance with law, to take comments from the public regarding the suitability of the Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement to Issue Bonds, the Corporation now desires to provide for the issuance and sale of its $2,500,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1982 (Bayshore National Bank of La Porte Project) (the "Bonds"), by adopting a resolution substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Resolution"); and WHEREAS, the Act .further provides that the Governing Body must, by written resolution adopted no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the sale of the Bonds, specifically approve the resolution of the Corporation providing for the issuance of the Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The Resolution of the Corporation providing for the sale and issuance of the Bonds, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A", is hereby approved. 2. The Governing Body hereby finds that the Project: . (a) is located within the EBA; (b) will contribute significantly to the fulfillment of the redevelopment objectives of the Unit for the EBA; (c) is in furtherance of the public purposes of the Act; (d) conforms to any and all and is in substantial compliance with limitations prescribed by the EBA resolution; and (e) will contribute to the economic growth and stability of the Unit by removing a blighted condition, increasing and stabilizing employment opportunity, significantly increasing or stabilizing the property tax base and promoting commerce within the Unit and the State of Texas. 3. It is hereby found, determined and declared that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of the meeting of the Governing Body at which this resolution was adopted was posted at a place convenient and readily accessible at all times to the general public at the City Hall of the Unit for the time required by law proceeding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended, that such notice r 1.~~ -2- s ~. ~ • • included notice of a public hearing to be held on this day with respect to the subject of this resolution, that such public hearing was held and any comments from the public were taken at such public meeting and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this resolution and the subject matter thereof have been discussed, considered and formally. acted upon. The Governing Body further ratifies, confirms and approves such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. PASSID AND APPROVED this day of December, 1982. --------------------------------------------------- CITY OF LA FORTE By: Virginia Cline, Mayor • ATTEST: • -3- City Secretary -~ . .. • • RESOLUTION OF CITY OF LA PORTS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPPIENT CORPORATION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF BONDS AND APPROVING DOCUPIENTS ~_J • WHEREAS, the Development Corporation Act of 1979, Article 5190.6, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes (the "Act"), authorizes and empowers the City of La Porte Industrial Development Corporation (the "Corporation") to issue revenue bonds on behalf of the City of La Porte, Texas (the "Unit"), to finance the cost of projects comprising land, buildings, equipment, facilities and improvements, found by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the "Board") to be required or suitable for the promotion of manufacturing development and expansion and for the industrial development and expansion of .industrial facilities and for the promotion of employment; and WHEREAS, the Board adopted a resolution on August 10, 1982, pursuant to which a certain Agreement to Issue Bonds between the Corporation and Bayshore National Bank of La Porte .(the "User"), a national banking association, was executed and delivered, whereby the Corporation agreed to provide for the financing of the cost of the ~, ~~ User s project (the Project ) which was initially described in Exhibit "A" to said Agreement to Issue Bonds and is more fully described in Exhibits A and B to the Loan Agreement between the Corporation and the User referenced below, in accordance with the provisions of the Act; and WHEREAS, for purposes of financing the cost of the Project, the Corporation now desires (i) to authorize the issuance of its Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1982 (Bayshore National Bank of La Porte Project) (the "Bonds"), in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000, pursuant to the terms and provisions of a trust indenture, (ii) to provide for the sale of the Bonds to the purchaser described herein, (iii) to provide for the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds with revenues derived from the loan of proceeds of the sale of the Bonds to the User to finance the costs of the Project pursuant to the terms and provisions of a loan agreement and (iv) to take and authorize certain other actions in connection with the foregoing; and WHEREAS, the Board has examined proposed forms of a trust inden- ture, a loan agreement, a collateral assignment and security agreement and a letter of representation, all comprising a part of this resolution, and the Board finds that the form and substance of such documents are satisfactory and the recitals and findings contained therein are true, correct and complete and hereby adopts and incorporates by reference such recitals and findings as if set forth in full in this resolution, and finds that it is in the best interest of the public and the Corporation and assists in carrying out the public • purpose of the Corporation and of the Act to authorize the execution and delivery of such documents; and WHEREAS, the Board has examined the proposed form of a deed of trust, security agreement, assignment of rents and financing statement from the User to Edward H. LaMair as mortgage trustee, for the benefit of the Corporation, and the Board finds the form and substance of such document is satisfactory; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THAT: 1. The Corporation hereby authorizes and directs the issuance of the Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000, in accordance with a trust indenture substantially in the form of the Trust Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1982 (the "Indenture"), by and between the Corporation and Cullen Center Bank & Trust, as trustee (the "Trustee"), which was presented to the Board, the form, terms and provisions of such Indenture and the Bonds being hereby authorized and approved, and the President and any Vice. President of the Corporation are hereby severally authorized and directed to execute and deliver such Indenture and the Bonds on behalf of the Corporation, and the Secretary of the Corporation is hereby authorized to attest and affix the Corpora- . tion's seal thereto, with such changes therein as the officers executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by such execution thereof. 2. The loan of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds by the Corporation to the User in order to provide financing of the costs of acquiring and constructing the Project shall be effected pursuant to the terms and provisions of a loan agreement substantially in the form of the Loan Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1982 (the "Loan Agreement"), by and between the Corporation and the User, which was presented to the Board, the form, terms and provisions of such Loan Agreement being hereby authorized and approved, and the President and any Vice President of the Corporation are hereby severally authorized and directed to execute and deliver such Loan Agreement on behalf of the Corporation, and the Secretary of the Corporation is hereby authorized to attest and affix the Corporation's seal thereto, with such changes therein as the officers executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusive- ly evidenced by such execution thereof. 3. As a condition to the actions authorized in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this resolution, the User shall have executed a deed of trust, security agreement, assignment of rents and financing statement substantially in the form of the Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, • -2- • • 1~~ u Assignment of Rents and Financing Statement, dated as of November 1, 1982 (the "Mortgage"), from the User to Edward H. LaPiair, as mortgage trustee, for the benefit of the Corporation, which was presented to the Board, the form, terms and provisions thereof being hereby authorized and approved. 4. The assignment of the Corporation's rights under the Mortgage to the Trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds shall be effected pursuant to the terms and provisions of a collateral assignment and security agreement substantially in the form of the Collateral Assignment and Security Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1982 (the "Assignment"), from the Corporation to the Trustee, which was presented to the Board, the form, terms and provisions of such Assignment being hereby authorized and approved, and the President and any Vice President of the Corporation are hereby severally authorized and directed to execute and deliver such Assignment on behalf of the Corporation, and the Secretary of the Corporation is hereby authorized to attest and affix the Corporation's seal thereto, with such changes therein as the officers executing the same may approve, such approval to be con- clusively evidenced by such execution thereof. 5. The sale and delivery of the Bonds by the Corporation to Cullen Center Bank & Trust (the "Purchaser"), at the par value thereof, • is hereby authorized and approved. 6. The actions and obligations authorized in Paragraphs 1 through 5 of this resolution shall be subject to and conditioned upon the receipt by the Corporation, on th'e date of delivery and payment for the Bonds (the "Closing Date"), of (i) a letter of representation from the User, duly authorized and executed by the User, dated the Closing Date, substantially in the form of the Letter of Representation (the "Letter of Representation"), which was presented to the Board, the form, terms and provisions of such Letter of Representation being hereby authorized and approved and the President and any Vice President of the Corporation are hereby severally authorized to signify the Corporation's acceptance and confirmation of such Letter of Representation by executing the same on behalf of the Corporation in multiple counterparts; (ii) an invest- ment letter, duly authorized and executed by the Purchaser, dated the Closing Date, substantially in the form of the Investment Letter (the "Investment Letter"), which was presented to the Board, the form, terms and provisions of such Investment Letter being hereby authorized and approved; (iii) a certificate from a representative of the Texas Indus- trial Commission (the "Commission"), acting on behalf of the Commission, evidencing final approval of the Loan Agreement; (iv) the purchase price for the Bonds; and (v) such opinions, evidences, certificates, instru- ments or other documents as shall be requested by the Corporation's • -3- • Counsel or by Bond Counsel, to evidence due performance or satisfaction by the User at or prior to such time of all agreements then to be performed and all conditions then to be satisfied by it. 7. The officers, employees and agents of the Corporation, and each of them, shall be and each is expressly authorized, empowered and directed from time to time and at any time to do and perform all acts and things and to execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name and under the corporate seal and on behalf of the Corporation all certificates, financing statements, instruments and other papers, whether or not herein mentioned, as they may determine to be necessary or desirable in order to carry out the terms and provisions of this resolution and of the Bonds to be issued hereunder, as well as the terms and provisions of the Indenture, the Mortgage, the Assignment, the Letter of Representation and the Loan Agreement hereby authorized and approved, such determination to be conclusively evidenced by the performance of such acts and things and the execution of any such certificate, financing statement, instrument or other paper. 8. The officers of the Corporation (with the assistance of the User) shall prepare a final transcript of the proceedings relating to the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds, which transcript shall be submitted to the Commission within sixty (60) days • after the Closing Date. 9. Based upon representations made by the User to the Board, the Board hereby affirmatively finds that: (a) the Project will have the effect of creating and stabilizing employment within the Unit; (b) the Project is required or suitable for the promotion of manufacturing development and expansion and for the industrial development and expansion of industrial facilities and is in fur- therance of the public purposes of the Act; and (c) .the Project will contribute to the economic growth or stability of the Unit by: (i) increasing or stabilizing employment opportunity; (ii) significantly increasing or stabilizing the property tax base; and (iii) promoting commerce within the Unit and the State of Texas. -4- • • (d) the Project is located within the Unit and within or adjacent to the Eligible Blighted Area (as that term is used in the Rules for Issuing Industrial Revenue Bonds of the Texas Industrial Commission) designated by the City of La Porte, Texas on July 7, 1982. 10. This resolution shall take effect and be in full force and effect upon and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of December, 1982 • • -5- • • CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS I, the undersigned officer of the City Council (the "Governing Body") of the City of La Porte (the "Unit") do hereby execute and deliver this certificate for the benefit of alI persons interested in proceedings of the Governing Body of the Unit and the validity thereof, and do certify as follows: 1. I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting officer of the Unit for the office shown below my signature; as such I am familiar with the facts herein certified; and I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this certificate. 2. The Governing Body convened in Regular Session on the day of ,..1982, at the regular meeting place thereof, and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of the Governing Body and all ~ of said persons were present, thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, among other . business, the following was transacted at said meeting: a written resolution was introduced for the consideration of the Governing Body. It was then duly moved and seconded that said Resolution be adopted; and, after due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the adoption of said Resolution, prevailed and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: 3. A true and complete copy of the aforesaid Resolution adopted at the meeting is attached to this certificate. 4. SucYi Resolution has been duly and lawfully adopted by the Governing Body, has been duly recorded in the minutes of the Governing Body for such meeting and has not been amended and is in full force and effect. 5. Written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of the meeting of the Governing Body was posted at a place convenient to the public in the administrative offices of the Unit and on a bulletin board located at a place convenient to the public in the City Hall of the Unit, for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of such meeting; both places of posting were readily accessible to the general public at all times from such time of posting until the scheduled time • ~~ ~ • t • of such meeting; and such meeting was open to the public as required by law at all times during which the Resolution ar_d the subject matter thereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Law, Article 6252-17, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, as amended. SIGNED AND SEALED this day of , 1982. SEAL • 443D09/T ~J TITLE: Fz t • • • RESOLUTION WITH RESPECT TO COMMERCIAL PROJECT WHEREAS, La Porte Industrial Development Corporation (the "Issuer") has adopted a resolution with respect to the issu- ance of bonds to finance a commercial development (the "Project") for Trangalee Development, Inc. (the "User"); and WHEREAS, the project proposed by the User is suitable for the promotion of commercial development and expansion and in furtherance of the public purposes of the Development Corporation Act of 1979, adopted by the legislature of the State of Texas (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the Project is located in an area which has been determined by the City Council of the City of La Porte to be a "blighted area" within the meaning of the Act; WHEREAS, the Issuer; acting through its officers and Board of Directors, has recommended that preliminary approval for the Project be given so that the owners can proceed with the Project: NOW, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of La Porte that: 1. Preliminary approval is hereby given in connection with the issuance of bonds by the Issuer to finance the Project. 2. The "Resolution With Respect to the Issuance~of Bonds to Finance a Commercial Development" is hereby specif- ically approved. • 443D09/R F3 • • r O ~ ~ m r / ~ N ~ a • 1/ w D Z D ~m ~o > ,~ ~, a~ ~~ ,~ 7~ ,, m+ ~~ LA PORTE PLAZA s STATE HIGHWAY 148 LA PORTE, TEXAS I~ ~ ~~~ • • • • i . l' .,~ ~, I '~. 1 i 1 i ~~ I l~~ ~~ m~ i~. =I 4 ~ ~, ~ -i . 11 1 I I I I I a N ~!~ f ~ ~ ' ~ ~ •m is ;~ ~: ~ • 1 ~ eD io ; °• 2 i e 1 i / I ,` a~ iii _' ~I ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~I `', ~~~ ~~~~~ • _--- ~ ii it -.. ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~-~ Hill<<!~~~~ v ~.o.w. I ~a ~w I I io ~ 1 y s I IN ~a a ~ ~ ~ ~ LA PORTE PLAZA ~ ~ q , , a s ~,~ '~ ~ a STATE HIGHWAY 14E ~ Q.,; ~ a lA PORTE, TEXAS A J ~ ~I • ~ ~ TRANGALEE DEVELOPMENT. INC. ~ • DEVELOPERS • PLANNERS ~ ARCHITECTS • BUILDERS • CONSULTANTS LA FORTE PLAZA LAI~ID USE SL~T'1ARY LAI~ID Shopping Center Develognezzt 6.24 Acres Reserved Development 1.46 Acres Total 7.7 Acres BUILDING A: Cinana I, II, III (300 seats each) 10,000 SF A>zusement Games 5 , 400 SF Lease Space 10,000 SF . BUII,DING B • Lease Space 19,200 SF BUII~ING C: Lease Space 19,200 SF Total 64,400 SF PROJECT OOST: Land: 271,812 @ 4.00/SF = 1,037,248.00 Canstructian Cost: 60,400 @ 26.00/SF 1,570,400.00 Developm~t Cost 64,400 @ 10.00/SF 624,400.00 Total Project Cost $ 3,282,048.00 • • 12 GREENWAY PLAZA SUITE 902 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77046 713!5521991 405 BROADWAY 512!2229401 4910 SAN BERNADO 5121772-5271 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205 LAREDO, TEXAS 7804'1 • • C7 • • ~N ~~ ^m ' -n u r O ' Z 0 - -i ~- ~~ wQT N tT11ttT ~~ m i ~ ~ x f A I w A f O O 0 O O O O ~p v O r~ r s s r s s ~ ~ r r ~ n~i s O ~ w s 7 O ^i ^~ ~ O e ,2 s _ s • M r O , a O v m y S r 2 v a y O rn 3 ~ ~ = a ~ ~ a TRAVELODGE LA PORTE ~ ~ I ,~ WEST H 3T 7 ~«'+ '•~' o . . ~ : Ix LA PORTE, TEXAS • • • • TRAVELODGE L ! ~V~- • A PORTE .~ ~L ~i M~11 NN~1 M.~« TYrICAI ROOM ~TRANGALEE DEVELOPMENT, tNC. LE •aROUP ARCHITECTS r~ U • • ~ TRANGALEE DEVELOPMENT, INC. ~ C7 ZRAVII.DDGE IA PORTS DEVELOPERS • PLANNERS • ARCHITECTS • BUILDERS • CONSULTANTS DESCRIPTI~1 OF PROPOSED PRfJJELT ~e proposed 120-room Travelodge ~ Restaurant is to be built an a tract of 2.5 acres located on the Frontage Rd. east of I~ay. 146, an the South West quadrant of the intersection of North 8th street and North H Street near Nbrgans Point in Ia. Porte. Architectural renderings depict a two building scheme for the hotel. ~e main building faces the corner of North H and Frontage Rd. on State I~ay. 146, and is a two story building. It will contain the Hotel's administration offices, lobby and trap guest wings of 120 room capacity with 161~car parking. the second building .located between the firings of the main building will contain the Restaurant and lcnazge/bar facility overlooY.in~ the pool area. We recommend that the configuration of 120 roams is as follows: Type of Room Consisting of Size N~Iber of Bedrooms Double-double 2 Queen-sized Beds 12'8"x25'6" 72 ~g 1 King-sized Bed 12'8"x25'6" 46 Suite 16'0'25'6" 2 Total Bedroans ~'~0- Food and beverage facilities for the proposed Travelodge include: • Facili - eat' F~ ree SQUae footage Main Dining room 100 1,600 16. I,ota~ge/Bar 100 1,800 18 . • • 12 GREENWAY PLAZA SUITE 902 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77046 71315521991 SOS BROADWAY 5121222-9401 4910 SAN BERNADO 512/772-5271 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205 LAREDO, TEXAS 78041 :~, ~ • • • • TRANGALEE DEVELOPMENT, INC~ DEVELOPERS • PLANNERS • ARCHITECTS • BUILDERS • CONSULTANTS TRAVEf.ADGE LA FORTE PROFORMA LAND COST 2.5 Acres = 108,900 sf. @ 5.50 sf ~ _ OONSTRIJCTION OOS`T = 120 Roams and Support Facilities 55,388 sf. @ 35.000 sf. _ Restaurant = 3,400 sf. @ 70.00 = park' n~ _ Landscaping = F1.irnishing = Architect and Engineer = Interim Interest -` Point and Fee (3% of loan) _ Construction Overhead (8%) _ Legal, Tax = contingency = Total Cost = Cost Per Roan = 33,600.00 12 GREENWAY PLAZA SUITE 902 105 BROADWAY 5121222A401 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205 598,950.00 1,938,580.00 238,000.00 65,000.00 10,000.00 360,000.00 80,000.00 276,000.00 66,000.00 176,800.00 30,000.00 200,000.00 4,039,330.00 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77046 71315521991 4910 SAN BERNADO 512!772.5271 LAREDO, TEXAS 78041 lr~ u • • PORT TRUCK SERVICE CENTER • Land - 36,790 sq. ft. C $5.00 a square foot Site ~Vork Concrete slab and parking Building - 97' x 80' 1lietallic Building, Equipment, Plumbing, Electrical, Offices TOTAL PROJECT COST $183,950.00 20,000.00 75,000.00 130,600.00 $409,550.00 • • • • • CITY OF LA PORTE INTER-OFFICE :fEPIORA~'DU`i To: Jack Owen - City Manager DATE: November 8, 1982 FROM: John Joerns - Engineering Dept. SUBJECT: Water Main Extension to TCDC The easements necessary for the construction of the water main to serve TCDC should be received within a week. Once they-are in, the Engineer for TCDC, Carlos Smith, will be ready to advertise for bids. As you may recall the question of oversizing the water main from an 8-inch to a 12-inch has been discussed several times but has not yet been approved by Council. Please schedule this item for Council action as soon as possible so that we may proceed with the bid process. The cost of oversizing was estimated at $68,450.00 in August 1982. Due to the addition of several valves the cost may now approach $70,000.00±. Although Southern Pacific Railroad refused to participate in the total cost of the oversizing it would be to the City's advantage to contact them again and request at least a partial participation based on their frontage or acreage. It is recommended that the City of La Porte fund the oversizing, whether or not any other contributions are received up front, since the 12-inch main is needed to serve the undeveloped acreage in Northwest La Porte. ~~ Joh~~i~ Joerns JJ/st ~r ~' .L C] CII` OF L~ PORTE • I:ITE~-=FZCE ME*iORAND~^iS To: Jack Owen DATE: August 17, 1982 • FROM: .John Joerns .. ~ -• SUBJECT: Water h1ain Extension to TCDC Earlier this year Southern Pacific Railroad expressed an interest in participating in the oversizing of the proposed water main from an 8-inch diameter to a 12-inch diameter main. Unfortunately, the City has recently • received word that Southern Pacific does not plan to participate in the oversizing. Personally, I feel that this is somewhat of a nearsighted decision by Southern Pacific as they will not be able to serve their 296 acre ± tract with an 8-inch mater line (they will again be notified of this situation). Since this northti~~est corner of La Porte is not properly served with • potable water it would be of extreme benefit for the City of La Porte to participate in the oversizing. The estimated cost of oversizing is x68,450.00 ~fihich includes the additional engineering fees and a 10% construction contingency. The project will not be bid until all the easements have been executed and returned. This will most likely take us forward into fiscal year 1982-1983. I strongly recormend that this item be presented for Council's consideration during sessions relating to the fiscal year 1982-1983 budget. JJ/st ~~ ohn Jlaerns ~ --~ • • December 1, 1982 • • To: Jack Owen, City Manager From: H.F. Freeman, Jr. SUBJECT: Police Cars Attached to this memo please find a copy of an Interlocal Agreement between the Houston-Galveston Area Council and the City of La Porte concerning the possible purchase of police cars. The HGAC conducted the bid procedure in an effort to purchase police cars cheaper for member cities. Charlie Thomas Chrysler/Plymouth Inc. 6200 South Loop East Houston,Texas was selected as low bidder at $8,058.15 per unit on a 1983 Plymouth Grand Fury. The bid does fit our specifications with two options bringing the • price of each unit to $8,134.65. We budgeted $70,259.00 to purchase four (4) patrol units and three (3) detective cars. By purchasing the cars through HGAC at $8,134.65 per unit, we can purchase seven (7) automobiles for $58,650..82 saving $11,608.18 of the budgeted monies. I recommend we purchase the seven (7) police cars through the Houston-Galveston Area Council. Res J .F.~-~ e , HFFjr/kf • ~ ~ HOUSTON ~GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL Office of the Executive Director MEMORANDUM T0: Chief Executives, Area Cities FROM: Jack Stee SUBJ: Police Patrol Automobile Voluntary Joint Purchase DATE: November 17, 1982 I am writing to inform you about H-GAC's cooperative purchase of police patrol automobiles and to offer your government an opportunity to parti- cipate. H-GAC's Board yesterday approved a contract with Charlie Thomas Chrysler- Plymouth, low compliant bidder, for a basic, heavy duty police specifica- tion automobile. Bid price for the Plymouth Gran Fury was X8,058.15. About 20 bids were received from dealers throughout the region. • H-GAC planned this cooperative purchase in consultation with local law enforcement officials. Most officials indicated that they would transfer auxiliary equipment from current police patrol vehicles. This price therefore does not include light bars, radios, or trans- port cages. However, H-GAC has also accepted bids on these items, and you may order them. In addition, there are other options you may add to the basic car, such as AM radio, To participate, you should execute the enclosed interlocal agreement and purchase order. H-GAC will place an order based upon executed interlocal agreements, which constitute a firm commitment to purchase. Payment a!ill be requested at delivery, which should be in 60-90 days. This project has been developed and will be carried out solely through local cooperation. H-GAC has no grant funds to assist with the purchase. However, we hope you find the bid price advantageous since it is based upon a larger regional purchase than one city might otherwise make. If you have any questions about this program or if you need specific documentation of H-GAO's competitive bidding process, please contact Deidre Schueler, H-GAC's Public Services Manager. /cs enclosures • po OO o I~Oo~ ~~77~77 77`i1~~6~~I~~~000 ~3~700 ~l SIC ~ af~QC~Q~ aOM~0~19 4C~~{Q~ ~~~l~~g~ .. ~~. _ _ .: __ .__ . _ . _. _.y -~-s-_ _ . -----~ ~ ~~ INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT r~ r STATE OF TEXAS ~ COUNTY OF ~ CITY OF ~ THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("A reement") made and entered into pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act Article 4413(32c)Y.T.C.S.) by and between City of Texas, hereinafter called the "City", and the Houston-Galveston Area Counci a Council of Governments of the State of Texas, hereinafter balled the "Council". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase certain Police Patrol Automobile(s), and WHEREAS, the Council is willing to procure the Police Patrol Automobile(s) for the City. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT in consideration of the mutual covenants., agreements and benefits to both parties, it is hereby agreed as follows: I. Within 120 days after the date of execution hereof, the Council will procure the Police Patrol Automobile(s) described in the order form for Police Patrol Automobile(s) (Exhibit "A"), attached hereto. The Police Patrol Automobile(s) shall be procured in accordance with the regulations governing competitive bidding procedures of the Council: the terms hereof: and the quantities, qualities and at the unit prices and administrative surcharge as indicated on Exhibit "A". II. All of the Police Patrol Automobile(s) purchased hereunder shall be of new manufacture and undamaged and shall meet the specifications as determined by Council Staff in response to requests from the City. The Police Patrol Automobile(s) shall carry the manufacturer's full warranty to the City. Provided, however, that it is understood and agreed that the Council has acted only as an agent for the City in its purchase and makes no warranty, either implied or expressed, regarding the fitness or merchantibility of the Police Patrol Automobile(s). III. The City, by execution of this agreement, agrees to furnish to the Countil, on or before receipt of the automobile(s), a cash amount in full payment of the stated orders as specified in Exhibit "A". IV. The City agrees to present an authorized representative at Charlie Thomas Chrysler/Plymouth, Inc., 6200 South Loop East, Houston, Texas, for the purposes of "check out" end acceptance of the auto- mobile(s) within five (5) days after notification that said automo- bile(s) are ready for delivery. Further, the City shall verify acceptance of the automobile(s) in writing to the Council within five (5) days after acceptance of same. V. The City agrees that Manufacturer's Statement of Origin will be endorsed directly to the City at the time of receipt and acceptance of the automobile(s). Further, the City accepts responsibility for vehicle registration and transfer. This agreement (inclusive of the attached Exhibit "A") constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto relating to the rights herein granted and the obligations herein assumed. The later date of execution by the of the City, Mayor, City Manager or the Executive Director of the Council hereinbelow shall constitute the date of execution hereof. Page 1 of 2 •" r 1 • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF this instrument, in duplicate originals, has been • executed by the parties hereto as follows; a. It has on the day of 1982, been executed by the of the City, on behalf of the City, Mayor or City Manager pursuant to an of the ordnance, resolution or purchase order City (attached hereto) so authorizing. b. It has on i:he day of 1982, been executed by the Executive director of the Council on behalf of the Council, pursuant to an order of the Board of Directors of the Council so authorizing. • CITY OF HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL • ~ ~ ~ U BY Mayor or City Manager BY JACK STEELE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Page2of2