HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-05-06 Workshop Meeting
'-
, ~7
7l;,v >)d d~
771 ~~/JJ'~ /h zj,~ ,
~^,~~d-.~~ &1~
~. d /~~~- ~ d ~'tUU'.L- ~ '
u ~L-r--.r -r~ ~cI L~~
ht-~ ~~
.. .
~~A,~Ad ~
~~
J~ 1;/:;7
e
.
. .. :', '.~'.. r~ ~ ,
.," ..
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we ~et a better am~lance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
Name
#~~4
:D e\), 0-- .s. f1\: /'\ ; ~
~' ~~
~
~~
1~~
~~
.p~
U~
(;)r~eU~
~?7/~.h
(jf1'mdf-~
~~>4'e4~~
Q~ Yb-~
~a -:r. (1~
~i~
\'\
1)~;6
6J~~~~
Address ~/ . . ~/J
1//~...h;- ~~ il /".
~loO~\ \~\s.\ ~p
!,;-a/ll. "S" ~, ~
1"= ,,,'0 -
4-fA(7 A~ ~/
~ k ?'7~
~d/ ~ ~.
1:L7 ~~~.
/~;!J/q ~~U
l ~~ C\I1c.k..
r C).,.';;>- 0 e~ ~. 19
Phone
~7/--/Y7?
l.\ '1 C\ ,-..3 q ~ (-( .
r'?/~ !/~6D
3-" >' -{,/,,If
"7"? /- 3/62..
;5""3 g -/1 ~,
41 \ 2-2'e'l
3'3lj-1 J3 ~
/~/1 ~p,~,.r- ~n/ 7!' ~u-,pS"yI'
/d.3/' vb (L 4rA ~/- /6.0'3
)'11 I :5 ~ /r? ~ I*d' y? t'- Tt'jPtu
732 .s;, ~ ~ t71/0J1-.?
g~:s. ;/o-I..~ &.' 4--~ 4'J~-7rfd-c(
t ( .". c. >.._ .,..
;;(()..(joJv 4 '7/-tf rf d <f!J
~
11().("Mf
/~/5 r6.P.tA~
/0Ja:Yq ~
Ct (r S, Jv,J.. -IP
/~%"~ ~~~
q.l/~ - 139")
//J
f/7/~9'r~ ;:;
L/1j/- ~{/U
rP3Ig?Zy~~
tJ/3-c2~~
::)J
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we get a better ambulance '. f
service in fue City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
I accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18,1984.
Phone
f1 f-tJc, 2-/
f71-7tf~i
, , ,
'. .
.
e
,..
Address
17-~CJf) M
0l2.:t J~
'1&/
/
: .~~.
r~~~ Rj~ tJ4-,{Ail~e"
5 p.~ '?~h\~
t 1ad:;J. f?~t/' /6</t</IJWPt4 77!4/<..
1~ ;r~, 1///0 P $7
f {lJAtJtJ (I1,tt/Jll;l , ~"2-1() (! La~'1
? f/\~ ...hit'" I J~ l '\\0 N, \ 0 ~
/t\ &d-~ /)3t3~
/14~.~tP"b~t'L ~/:ZEt (Y11~ ~I
l.Lb~a~~ "l'\4 M.......9eW~
Ij O~tI; D W"'IJ fA ~1?
It{~~~'
IS VA tfJp/
I,
t"' It) 3 5 ~IJ-M 11/ <::-
77/S~ ~o2..
7 7 7 So.;? .:2~ 3 b
~tJ Co S . & I!
.
,.
. . ,
. ",
........ .,,:'~.,:.~
Ll79-hS-p7
f7/- J,,*t.r-
<f1 1- 0'70 i
,Q pi.... S ~;/t!J
tfl/ -7/I'S
~'O~ ~~~
~70p.l'~J
,/7;-(. 3 ~ ~
1..\'1o..g.o15
4"-:)..-'19 y
~7&- ./..$.:l?
L!7/- 7// f
t.J1~ -f13L
7' 7) 5-096'
r'. " '
. ,
.
e
e
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we eat a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
-Z-l"'"L.-
t{ (
IR/ 'i~fI..-~#, ~j-
/1_ __ ~ '. ~t.I-;11 .5. /C,9/'t1jJ ~~
UVV'~ ~,
1/01 ~ ' 6/f{ 5:- Jf
~tM.LJ~- tf()S-~' ~,
VI:;; -.!.A~ ..L~. ~7 /~ 9?~/
~J. ~PL loolV' ()7 'OA-cI q'll _ /S.41.9
$-~8+' /k.' tJ"'- /Y- 13 Y L I I ilL. / 47/ -- '/9d/
. . ~ ItJ~/;?Ro(-F-Y /~ . n
/p I; '" ~ tf7J-~'>?!
/JJ (l, /}v~ 1 of, 11/1 /,-H~
7' ~ 13 tL~ / () 00'] 7/.;,e/;yJ /.. /1;f6.Q'c
e mb JIl tI-14 ,1sT 72<{ J-~"/)()fl.r;.
4~/av3Vey- cC7~ ,f6<fJ.?
~d:S~ _ :I ~ Jj)~
L/\ II
(04Z3 Qu,cE/ li'I-L
€. YVI~
Phone
2t7/-~4/6j-
\. t' l
I
I
.1
I
4-7 I ... 4S4--?
4"71 "-S9r
17/-/5;4
l{ 11... t) I () 0
rrVI 1- '-f G CtCf
Lr
tj'7/- 77.f2---
vlJ/) - /'2-~~ _
)f
e
e
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we eet a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
Name Address
'/??3'd(,
, i
I
Phone
! I
I I
I I
fC;
~~
~
d~t~
lJ~~ ~fS~
~~~~~S-\O~C~ 1-7'- 7b~
~' P 1'7~ q~'$ (2.,d;. /2<-/1 tf1D - &761
A a./2' . /107,.e7J';kc . L/1JlJ13M
-2J.. r (//!IL t(71--~~r",?-
~~'&- 3/11 ~j)~4 4-7/--1-076
~ ~ =tI-l ~ Uru. L{1\~"Vy<61 . :
~ J hc4 7f2~ LJtUJ$0.r '5l/C--Cf1IJ(I
h~1m,(j(~ "I~JL~ - /f-70-;;2.\57
~~ S"~,j jJ,~, 'f7J~ ,j{l.5$
b0:4 (LS'~~V"\v :n.o 6~\e,lq It''lo-C\4\'l
/? M. ((, WO~ 'i)05 pOJI" h L/,Io - 'K g/)')
If? l~trO~ Y
~<..,I7?9~
S7~'~
71 8 5 tIo(yt,(~~
lf7/- "3 ~ ~7
lf7/- ?G,SY'
q.7f 1<1'13
7/1' .s. /~
'-/7/-/91 "3
~7/;7~;:L CJ
, I
I
I
e
e
We the:undersigned feel it is imperative that we get a better ambulance
service. in the City of La Porte~ Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
Jj~'
~@~~,
/E ;,~J~ J J130 fo;.;.!J ,La?pr!& 'f1/v 11t{!/'j
It uJ~ ~~tf ~V~ ofA~ Lf-71-~/4Y
, /o8{)7 7l~ X ~~ 11/-).18'"0
J-~ · 0')"
~ ~ IUII( ~-t;.'~~o/~ ~ 1(7/~/~tJ7
#k~' 1/~ So,~4V0f2fid, - ~71--5t7P
C}~ C21 ~~ jo3o cQJ)d ~ 14ft, -1j.-~:J 01/10... B 'd-J ~
~ . ~~.3 (()~ 47/-b~79
Jd' 11<1' u.J~.a.... "7 33 ..I, 'l ~ ~
C> 0 ~ ,D. 9?/tjf~ ~
~c?/~~
9: U -+~
00, ScA~" S ~+
p~ /IJ~ ~ to.....
~ '~~~'l1~4'"?,,ff-
~~~ 6',o/~. ~
~df-- 'q 1P e;;Jl'''/~Y YF:j,,;.k 1/717' 7:4~
~~ ~ hJSd'J'-'f/J'~
~~~011~( ~+- f ?j-055.~ I
. ~o..-yc:U\ ~a..v-' 33<' '-:5~~~ tF3/ 1(71.; r?1~
ADDR,ESS
.Jb/:JW:Nf/ltf itl)()g
/Z3wtJlJ~aJ
[) .... ~ /;;.{S eI >1
PHONE
f"3t{- 7'119
532> -3~9.s-
Lrv4UJ/l- afT'(
/11'4 Gt lC<.Wl.Cl _ .
lo.(?o)C,~
t.lt7/-;))l/?
47D-/5 7~
'/7D - J'9?;L
47/-6973
17 j- (.1'1
""7/- 3 Q.teF
~7/- .$ tf 7K
:(.:;..
e
e
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we get a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge theCity Council to
accept proposal ~umber one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
Phone
q,\ \-\C\\.o~
Name Address ~ n _ .. 1;. t.^ nO
5~~~ ~S.~
/)11~ ~ ..J, ~ . ~'5 PJt:t' ~~
'"m,#:.evvv....l.."'J 4f,tuAV ;;'0 ,/0 ~~Ik... iit
{J~ f, lJ~ I:J oa 5, /I1()IVT.,ftll~
~~ ?:l7 ~{L/'" 4:f/#rU
.%-.~ I/OrJ. %A
.~::.-tlr~' 1fJ /lg03,':fteldC~
~ 9/9 O~
C'On ~'::I 5 w (!..~ n.'<<f _ ~ () '6
fYl.J~Jl {)A . Sl.{/ r;;,d IJ~
, ~ ~ . I~.? ~.'YY1~
(Jq ~ tl J? I?E> 'Z?.J?/~ ~/
. y~ ,~,3ISJY:'~
Sd~.. ~ Cjllf ~ .ft'~
(~tJ-.9n 1 _ ~ I
~~ S~,
H.-I~
~(/J1~ f2/5o !5YtJu.ltVeI/
W/P ~ g / ~- fil a-Jk. IL.u..
cf~r.tl/l:,r ? oJl s. 1M .I/,&>...1.5
71;.~~ . ~ a/~ ~i5:' ,
~~(~ . /OO()~i/LJ
0X a.~e;JVflt"oJJ J 109--..' (<Ukl _
}1~h~~ -41/1 ~4
i!Jf~ ~ ' 90/ ..J/~
~A~~ 5/~ tu. ~~
, ~lIf)f';' . to :( J. 5' 1!?tC/~ .5 ~t!J(y?-.u /../:.
I ~ a I IJ /(0 C-c.J rv ^ I\) <!...
~I~ ~ .~
?" S. Td-W;4-
Lf7 D '/7'~
A)/)IUC
fl/. rJ.
"1,/1 , ~7
lj 7-315;}-
C( 70 ,2(tio
$I7D -D~~i,
!7011e-
~7(-Or~::Z
7Ll>11-.
, Y? /-'/ t' f'e:..
'1)1-";).,' if
\..{'7 1- d... (!) 6-cr
~7l-'tlo~
~
"
"y? / '7 J?.7 J'
.. ....
y '7/...J9~~
//('0 - of/I) 7
q^jtJ . f6Z>~
Ll71 -Lof'71
11/- 1:,3>4-/
. '170 -(}~;I~
4 7/ -O:5~
'170 ... <Ill; 1'1
~ 'J
e
e
"
We the undersigned feel it is, ~mperative that we ~et a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
nf-3tJJ'7
;?;?/_~ 001
II
I
I
!
I{/'l / tJ IJ 3 r
'17/-tt203
7~lJ 5. Ii? -#/1
'-II 1- ?114~
41/ - ~~J~
)./70. 1'1 11 Cf
C[7o-lfV9
17/- t./t/tJo
I,.
/;.
L/1/ .- (jJ/(J 0
171-1701
~/: ~7 /-/p~/
2-~
jb
e
e
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we get a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
~
~ '
~ ci;~
~~
~~
!~ (j)~
~ (j~ ~f),,b ~~ f?/-S3!l3
'fm-fll4 L ~ 5" 1. ')-" 5. v~ 1--11 ! - {"]":/
(J 6 yY><IJY' .!;" -r 1\" / s.:t
/~ ( /~ -<:;J.~ 10 r~ s.) '17/- S-,2/r
dA-E' ~~ M'tf:3 H'ff~ .,Fcf/o.~1",(J;.-. '700
..J&)~..9j~ 6 If) S. I sr:/l'l7/- 6-:)./9
Ptttb1J4Z j3p~ tftJa ~. #~ U ~:; -'- 5-Y,s- 0
, ~ ~~ f5cD~-sJ h-LtPI-bQ.s.V
01lJ.- ~ ~d( ~ 1?/~ ~ ~..l-
7YJ ~I W~
Name
Address
Phone
~\~ ~.-s~
IO~34 ~
) ~ II ,Da..L...
f~ 1)0 ~/I.eI()aJ AI\J
/;}{)O ~(
/~O/t) 1tI~m.T'
~o1: M
4'1 \-Sq ta d..
\..f70-IOJq
If-,;; 0 .,;;<./ c;. f
4?f- lil,0
cf 7., L ~ -r~ 0"2-,
17/- %S.~7
II 7 I (b c/a
f
I
I
I
I
I
l
01
I
[
I
,.
Ie.
I" I(
/7
e
e
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we ~et a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
BeJ~
1,4, ~
It t.. lJo~ 4'0
, .
-f 14~
ifp~
II~~
f ./f~./
~U~~
Addres: '-P ,() '";::(-:--
~o cp ~~f'-oJ '""'\,
./OJf~ ~kU
~ ~l 11/. I ~iH 1]:.
fj} 5, qr#i~
Phone
L{Yt.l-'l "3 ~-3
Ltll - 7 C8~.3
470" ~t~
l/7/-Sf/ett
,
:10/ S. ()JJJ
.:l () I ~ oA';~
a 01 .s. (}J~
l./ ] I -, Y9tFY
470- 9~t:J7
~/ll-lfVty
4 '11 -1 ~ II "
'II " ~. v ,'r~ ill w "\
/'
,,-'
'" '
~
e
e
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we ~ct a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
:&
ct2
'1t;.et A-. ~f-
~~M
~ t ~ ~oF5 s. }tel
9I!'z ~ p,~ ~-~
COo~~ Coo rlll.."- L L (/1<>" II, t} cJe. P
A tel {;, ye/ CV ~;; 5"' AI~ /;)./h ·
(j(;citJ-~ ' 1'1 ~;fs., 6-' oz. c. ";2... S- ~ ~ /2 -7 h ·
~(R ~I ~71 37 ~6
m~ 4~~ AI. 4#
~. fjJ-~,
()~L(fi "111 s rr ';'--::;:-.L
~~ 7'1S~~
g(~~ <-/1 r L..U~
p~ n ~ I
~ I ~~, IY'. 9tJ. ~.:T:..
JAbw-~: ~ ~ /
(jJ~r-
.
~
~
J~/ (!4- 5/J~>~
~, I}.vc- "-{I, ~, e, ( 0-<- k..t.<.J_q
Address
fd<lJ;~ /c2 ~
6ot~ ~/f//I~ tJ~.
3'fo~ ~ It"Se,
g\fH (A~ w
I-
/&'0/ ..p~ CkI.-(.
~ qlo H-~' /4{;
'fM ~ 4-ti)/J.
Phone
, I
i I
: I
~?/--/ h.3 ;7
"'/7/- 5,;2./1 0
47(-() ZIJ 7'
4"bo ,.gO-b~
411-67)70
,-/7f-fteftT
~ 71 ,,() <1 7
f-7(_tO.(JJ 7Y?
aJj ~ 7 ~ 0 p:- 1/1 fJ-/IL (
~,(t, A). ~t4 ~
~~;- - ~F?r-
, I
I
I
I
I
~'7I..;i ~ 2,.. 0
17/-~v 7q
~7/- f.;!6'y
L/'h,.7. ~ ( 0
~'J-
e
e
I::e t.he undersigned feel it is imperative that VII; .get a bet ter p.mbulance
'..
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
-
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
-
Name Address ~
dYl~.W' ,j.~ f2(,,6.4_1:/:
ttL- h.JJz~ S-.z3.J10 ~
~ <<-._ ~ ~Jfo gD- Vl'('}';-" t e{.
~~~
~wU~
/I7~f?~ 33/9~~ 47~-59~s-.
~~.)j~ JOI7l ~~!k~. 'lp-73~7-}{K.n~<:V'
~ U~_ - - . n.. ~ L.lll-~"tOS-
",. . .~ u, ala \-..)~~ ~~CJ\.9...0
~. dh ~/() "J-cl~Jt}/r.kIU-t. ~71 '-tJ7if~
~~,.. ~ fJ-L-iY~ '1'1tl -d;1.-711
~~" ;1S-Z7 /l/.b-H c;7/-"~A()49
?f~'Pf~ tau. ~~ ~u.ry
a )( ~). /? //,if ~~coe L/ 7rJ- 9D 97
~ "f.!f~R 911 :])wlAL J(..7o - )(,0"3
y~ ~r(- IYCJ ~
, ~.Jt~ N~II~
~'~M:/ '6/0 50{ L J;19'
L: JJ ~. r n 1 r,+I~F1 ELf)
~' ~ b3+F14-rR....FJC-L~
'~/JIfI~ IltJl ~~~
Cj'':!:tlyS~D~nL <5(J(J(;? ~~
~ ~ ....=><t'o --.26'-d 5r~r~
Phone
~;\l) td, ~
33/9 ~ ~
41/-07 R-?
t.t71-F33;7
'Z..f ") I - Os'" f' y
"-r77--;J..7 ~
t!7&,- ,5-' 9 ~ 5 -
tf7f- :2. ~ 95-
if 7( - l.~ 'S~
~ 7/ -. fJ J-. L..--
471~B8:54-
t?7{)~~
97/ - 6a;;). '1
~71- t ttJv~
ol2..
" '
w~ the undersigned feel .is imperative that we ge~ better ambulance
service in the City of L orte. Therefore we urge 1IPty Council to accept
proposar number one presented to City Council on April 18,19840
/dcL'~
~
V pi ~ &"~ U~c/L D'2., tf76-<yrq
6~ /}-t(~ cuD C/'1(-'J/7Z
~I( KoJrlGtJe,;t 4117582. -
Ct'fJ(j81~
____ -'. Ro. lJo"!-z4J ~l:f1-:Z4~1
VIlIl1lO 4- tJ I'Jf I/II-? l-.~ /Jdylo ~ /
.~ 6~ r-1AA-0) ,
~ . tr1/-7170 ')JIfQ 3-o6!"e~
([Jcwlf uJ
/7 /J_ ~ n III S. ~ - till -91/Sc;
~ f\~
c:?-rt/.e;/~ 9~/ -S S'~H. ~7/...>JUfS
fIf~1: r
/~
47/2470-
) {
, (
lIf S.~j?I. t.f71- 1<1~1
gr,/~. t1:4 7'7(- S-~l..,~
17 ~
. We .the u~dersigned fee, . . .
s~rvice ~n La Porte iltt ~s ~mperat1ve th t "
number'one presented to c~~fo~e we. urge Cit; c~~n~~~etter ~bulance
y ounc~l on April 18, 1984~ accept proposal
~~' l.t!)jkI57~ tfll-1Jbt,~ M-~
~f(l '. ??'(DL f(=-4;<(~;rj cr:{)&
~~, ~ ;:)1I1V'.~~~ l./.7/-.231f7
~ ~ ~ .:L11)/. ~ '41-f-,:J..::347
~ of) '\ ~. IffiL
o v- _ ~71 -/ S-Ob
\
It{' ~.lOtf'1)-~/G
'1(~ ,'32b sQ7J-596CJ
51L~ ' q 10 ;,6~€-tf7( -5713
. . ;J..~:Z 3:3).---" L/7/- (, ("oR
--liJ:; '. b:P~ W/"t~t/'
_ ?/?'31ctHv t.e., q7/~
~~ ';4~~tJ4ik,4-.t1<j-61 ~5';-IS'SZ
t1~M IJ3/7f~~? <l71-tJ88f
~ ~ &/7 ~.. ,,/l/-t'/<SCl
~~ 103/1 t)ki ~ 'I7(J~;W'K1
~ ~ r8tJO H~ :tF"/Zd' 9<1/-IJ'~8
-jI~Jn~~ Jf/D sa ~ ~ ??()75 ?,7/~~Oa'1f
~~J.h~
~ ~ /).N\L (Qr.v\t" . .
7() ~ So. ~~
"~'L 'VI.V, \~ V-lJI,\I.
J..}7/-/{pIO
~1o ..t1-~1
10/
e
e
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we ~et a better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
Name
Address
8€-S" fJ fCC-A/ Qrl;u,J.~
,/11' ~
4/t'~
'-11)' ~
5" 07.j.
/6 (2-}
/o~~~
2.-S0} C H' car'"ttt
~c:ltJ/ 6CU/S),ife.
r jJ..O ) #tJ.I$P /I- elte .$
IOcf51 j/dt4uL
J:-57 J.. ~
Z 3'7 .:$ ~ajW
1.11 j,.fJ.:}- ,
1'6b.)M
0(10;2., ~, ~~
bl'i ~ r 511AJy LI7.
1\ I -t!.
, \......\.1.. ,J. 't ~
70'\ ~'t.I .
~IIK ~
.....
Phone
1/7 I - 7' S J 2--
t( 1/- J.)../J 1
~ >/- ~~t!:) j
;J,J-3~Ot}
Lf rt )-()?,JJ
97((Ii'O
.f7/-t, z,b
<II I 'fIb ~
t/- 7 f -0 t., q::2.
/..1-/1-7 Y:7-0
#7/-7Z<J~
1'70 - /68 7
rfo,/381'
~\\~'1\l\fl
17/ --k7.r :z-
~v
we the undersigned feel it is imperative that we get a better ambulance
. service in the City of~ Porte. Therefore we ur.City.council to accept
propoqal number one prlRrented to Ci~y Council on ill18,1984.
/nM.-tf ~ ~/3...h -zr~ "f7/-F<{9tJ i:;t,aP~~,
JJ.PM1ti rf! . Lf/3.itr. 1J~ '-/70 180 3 ~~ J~
C ~ v.1f- )17 5: kWA ,/11-3/{0 ~di ij:
).,#'&II:4""j ~(j -5..-r/~ ~7/, 73((, c:k..~ ~
~ r t:.,.Jo~v'" ~~ I/-?/-:JUE ~r ~
') V ~ C-( 1/ CJ 0 3 7 J. Pt. jQ 0 'I re. t.;X
q~ f(~ ~(() I ~<IMJ ~?' +7J-o$;O~ t.6..f~:>-Ul
p .Jot.~ <;o~ ~~~ 4'11- "l-'1IY: X",P;.;t;:,T^--.
. 10 / I II~/
~4e42 ~~~ ~J~"G \ . .r f/nlt!Jtf<<l9_ ~/~
~ _ $It,'~!//~ H-'1/~J-..3,j1~--PpUZ
~~ /If} ''&&1.;1/3 -;t/d::c.- 47/-::13 j-<>; ';:;4~
61 :n7~~
~~ ~~ ZtJt/,' !3DYS)lCJp..e '17/- 75'1tJ t-J9 Pt9p..re.
/fJlnLt L13D ~ ItfIt- (A;~ 41 { ~ Rq 3-
~~ 3;?7 s, 7f~ <f7/~~O'~
-;fdJ ~ L/l-t.j /IJ IblA.. 1{7/-or~(
. ~~~ ~1 \- tJ~bJ tJ 'f'~ , d~ ~ /LL
. '~J~ .171.:;'aoJS_."..$,Z~'~6~~~-r:
Jf11-~o/r .3 .2 r.l''' ~ ~~/,,;;z
~ J./,/-J'3;JJ' 4<>.,)."/ ~
~ Odu- ~.-, 117".~} 'l7-W P ~/d'
rfr ~. ~ tp 7I-r-/6FC3
z: ~ Li 7 tJ .- ;;;.;J tJ/
I)1IL..J1 ~u 471 ~ $~ IfL -
~o/
e
.' I
.
we the Undersigned feel it is imperative that we get a better ambulance
.
service in the City of La PorteD Therefore we ~~?e City Council to
accept proposal number one to City Council on April 18. 19840
Name
Address
lJat ~~ /~a l!p/~
c-~~\ 3301 ~,~.
~~ 3t.f3o~
~ 1f.A l{/Ot) /{'~ 131~
PIJInv IX' 61)1 r. ~~~1"I;1
~ ~ q 9/q fitonLlnfJdJ
-8.~ fDO!w~~ Cf7/-t/4t"
r;~/J7~ 1oo9~ 'ita
~ :r1-~ (O/~.3 ~
~l~ uJ~aR. 811. ~
~'??/()~ ?It?~~
of~ ,/~ /0;1631;:!t6#J ~-f-5//
fl1~ 1tJ/j. ~,s- ~ ~ L/7/-'f3,).!
/J :-I . #7/- 6/' 7
-r~4.. y~ 7:11 .;). /.51- ~ .
~~ 3ot,! ~
1vL~ ~ $""D b. ~O-V{c.-...J ~ 4-7( - 6<::''07
'~ 3310 BetNO-yJ q. ,9 - rSgf>
7~ Y'R' $:/r'AJ'lf"d( ~7/"L;~JI
~~~ # 9p/o~ . Y?/"')'j/d
R06l4.I ~ tf6<> ~,J~ ~1( -C~J
~7Jt. flub Sk /!~ f1/~~
~I
Phone
~~i/- 9go~
4'1<0' 959 '3
If7/-75.:2'3
qI!Lt-~:;( Iq
.13/.. 9 ~"I
'17/,7215
~70-/~o
Lf7/- 37r7
'-/11-/~5
"1'70 -/72S
~7C:; -o/g9
,/71... 415"3
We the undersigned feel it is imperative that we Get ~ better ambulance
service in the City of La Porte. Therefore we urge City Council to
accept proposal number one presented to City Council on April 18, 1984.
N '
~{)J 4~ A;;t:~ ;?4 {I/- -J'. Phone
~)2 ~,.. ,\\
UJ~ ~ti\ d~ Lj\,-\,\~lQ
'I${ ~JJ: /I11Of s:/~ ~71./ ~13
~ 1/(j5..fl~
~:::n:t' m S. (;eDwrJaC tf'll-S9 bv
I~ til SMM't LIJ,JEJ ~'T( -;?(D~
-;; / ~ S-cn-~-~ ~'7/- JIRJ
~~ ~~/S ~Lft Y )llV'e li ~ - /7 JoZ
-q~ I:r?- lito rJf~ 11/- 3 :oyr<
6.a-1!.~ 3o/~ LII'-f f!-'^"-. <;7/- f/ff2-J
. O~ ffi~
04 ~ ..'f~.4J...
e
0J10 .s. ~;~
#-.
e
I
I
! '
,
;
471-~?f2r
'-I1l~~ / /$3
I ,
I I
,
, !
I
I
I
</;/- 67b?
/1
r'
1.
A I-;l., 2.
B i 3.
t!..J-g 4.
DI-,2" 5.
E. J -410 6.
e
.
AGENDA
WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD
MAY 9, 1984, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL,
604 WEST FAIRMONT PARKWAY, LA PORTE, TEXAS, BEGINNING AT
6:00 P.M.
7.
CALL TO ORDER
ALFRED GARCiA - REGARDING SEWER EXTENSION
DOUG LATIMER - PLANNING & ZONING STATUS REPORT
DISCUSS THE REQUEST OF DECKER McKIM TO CLOSE 12th
STREET BETWEEN BLOCKS 1097 AND 1098 AND ALLEY INSIDE
BLOCK 1097 - J. Owen
DISCUSS PURCHASE OF SOFTWARE TO BE INSTALLED ON MICROCOMPUTERS
AT PUBLIC WORKS - J. Hodge
DISCUSS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT WITH TURNER
COLLIE & BRADEN, INC. - J. Owen
ADJOURNMENT
;\ ~ 1.l''''.....-w
i ~ ~ ~ 1'1 ~_
"" I ~ 'I
';:' ::1 1 ' '.,.. II
.".'\j' ;',
:t . : ~ ' I' t
:i'~ 1 ~ D
" ;~ ,:~";-"1'! ~ ~ 11'~
" :; ~ :;'.. j", .ll ~:'\:) ;j ~
j I ,.1 ,; i ;'1 J' i.; ii A
!l r/ :d:...u.ii,. al io' 'a'~j
....,.!lm. r.l?
.f 1: i ..: ~
l.. ~! ~ ~ fJI'.l I
:1 i::~~~~:i~
~~a~~~~Z11
t. 'I ' "', '1 ?\\......
: .,,~ :.l!i ,:.1
" ~ " ':"'~ /::;~ ",: '('
\~.J ;,J Ud ~ t\..,j &...
r
e
t
....
'r
e
"-~..-.
.....-: ..2!!
MEMORANDUM
May 3, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: Alfred Garcia - Sewer Extension
Mr. Garcia"has requested to speak to Council regarding
extending a sewer line to his property in order that he may
move a house there.
fll
'00. .
/-'.
\"
(.
('
('
(
(
(
..
\.
".
\
(
(
(
(
(
(
c
(
(
l
l
l
\..
e
e
t
..
.'--....-
CITY OF LA PORTE
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
J~N
~AULISSEN
UTILITIES
5/3/84
Listed below are excerpts of the city's requirements for utilities.
Mr. Garcia is apparently asking for utilities to his proposed bUilding
site at lots 17-20 block 759. This site is within 200 feet of
sanitary sewer service. Section 26-3 (a) of the Code of Ordinances
states the following:
(a) REQUIRED SEWER CONNECTIONS. Any owner, agent or occupant of
any property located within two hundred (200) feet of any street
or alley or of any lot or tract of land abutting upon any street
or alley along which extends any sewer or system of sewerage
collection previously constructed or which may be hereafter
constructed by the city, who shall construct, keep, maintain, use
or permit to be used upon such property or premises any water
closet, privy, sink, drain or other receptacle of sewerage not
duly connected with such city sewer or sewerage collection system
so that its contents are made to empty into such sewer or system
of sewerage collection, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The current Utility Extension Agreement requires that the owner pay
for the total actual cost of utility extensions. This requirement is
outlined in section (5) of the Extension Agreement.
Subject to the provisions of this agreement, City hereby agrees to
the construction and installation of said installation of utility
main(s) according to the plans and specification to be prepared by
the Owner's engineer and approved by the City. Upon completion
and approval of plans and specifications City wil1 place the
project for bid. When bids are received they shall be tabulated
by the City and a copy of said tabulation shall be provided to
City and Owner. Thereafter, Owner shall deposit with the City in
escrow a sum equal to the amount by the lowest responsible chosen
bidder, plus a sum equal to the estimated construction staking and
inspection fees if applicable. When said deposit has been made by
Owner, City shall authorize construction of said extension(s). It
is agreed and understood that the deposited escrow amount made by
Owner does not relieve Owner from paying for any unforseen
costs/or cost overruns in the project that result from
circumstances beyond the control of the City.
If I can supply you with any other information please contact me.
A~
~'..
('
(
(
(
(
(
(
((
(
(c
I{
([
(,
(
e
<.
(.
L
\...
~
i.
'-
e.
~
...
,,'
.
- ----...
..-: :.2!
MEMORANDUM
May 3, 1984
TO: 0 Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: Doug Latimer - P & Z Update
Mr. Latimer has requested to come before Council to give
a report on work the Planning & Zoning Commission has been
doing and the direction they, hope' to take in the future.
13'
e
~
,.
r
e
0- ____.
p~
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA PORTE
TO: Mayor Cline and Councilpersons
FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: Closing of 12th Street and Alley
DATE: May 4, 1984
Mr. Walker Nichols and Mr. Decker McKim are anxious to get
a building permit to start construction of a strip shopping
center. The closing of this section of 12th Street and the
alley is essential to the construction of the shopping center.
The closing of 12th Street will require the relocation of
a large sewer line. The exact location of the sewer line
is dependent upon a future request to close 14th Street.
Mr. Nichols has agreed to pay all costs of relocating the
sewer line along with any other extra costs caused by the
street closing. I see no problem with this particular
request, however, we are still working with Mr. Nichols
concerning the proble~ls involved with his tentative request
to close 14th Street.
ack Owen
JO/1lh
attachments
~I
e
~
..
4It
----...-
-.,
----
DECKER McKIM, INC, REAL TORSID
222 North 16th Street, P.O. Box 1711, La Porte, Texas 77571 . (713) 471-3633
December 2, 1983
City of La Porte
P.Oo Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77571
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed please find my check in the amount of $100.00
as application fee to close the following streets and
alley:
The alley inside Block 1097, Town of La Porte.
South 12th Street between Blocks 1097 and 1098,
Town of La Porte, from Fairmont Parkway to South ilK"
Street.
The North 30 feet of the Right-of-Way of West "K"
Street from the East Right-of-Way line of South
13th Street, to the West Right-of-Way line of
New' Highway 146.
Time is of the essence and I appreciate anything you can
do to expedite this matter.
Very truly yours,
REALTORS
DM/jf
m
REALTOR(!)
(!..:l,
COUNTY RECORDING
VOL. PG.
CITY OF LA PORTE
SURVEY '\ _ ~
OR ~ ~
ADDITION
Fo.~f'fY'b,"\t 'fu1~l<..JQi
J[)~'1
BLOCK
OR
ABSTRACT NO.
,
4It
.......
e
,
,
!
I
~
~
~
NJ
6L1<'
/tYIO
I~'" ,.. 11/0
II) 1 32
...
2 31
3 30
4 29
5 28
: 8 27
~ 7 26
a +
8 25 (.v
c"
. ....
-j-
9 24 'Q
')...
0"' "+l
-
10 - 23 "S
C\ ---
" 22
12 21
13 20
14 19
1= I' 18
III 16 17
N
~ U.)~ ~'> t k g
- --
-+-
C.l
Cu
....
.,....
~
~
,~
........
~
()J
4It
~
,,.
e
......---
r :-:!I
EN I EX. p, 0, BOX 937, LA PORTE, TEXAS n571
December 14, 198)
Cherie Black
City Secretary
City of La Porte, Texas, 77571
RE: Vacate, abandon and close~
1. Alley inside Block 1097,
2. South 12th Street between Blocks
1097 and 1098 from S.P.L. of Fair-
mont Parkway to N.P.L. of West K.
Street.
3. The north )0' of the right-of-way
of !1est K. Street from the East
right-of-way line of South 13th
Street, to the ~est right-of-way
line of New Highway 146.
Dear Mrs. Black,
In request #1 and J2, Entex does not have
any gas mains in described portions of 12th street.
We hereby release and abandon our rights to the
above described easement in Block 1097 and described
portion of 12th Street, provided similar releases
are obtained from the other utility companies hav-
ing the right to said street.
In reauest l/3, Entex does have an existing 6"
gas main in said described portion of West K. Street
running West to East which serves the City of La-
Porte and the Bayshore area.
We do not release this portion of West K.
Street as this gas main is vital to our operations.
However" to maintain its existence, options can be
worked out.
Sincerely,
$ 6:~~d'5
Mr. j. C. Randall,
Local Manager, En~ex
La Porte~ Texas
liJCR/ j c
cc: %r. Jim Acklen
C4
4It
.
,&
4It
....-..-
......- ...--.:t
E. J. Carey
Manager-Engineering (Design)
East District
@
Southwestern Bell
207 S. Munger
Room 101
Pasadena, Texas 77506
December 6, 1983
Ms. Cherie Black
Ci ty of LaPorte
Assistant City Secretary
P.O. Box 1115
LaPorte, Texas 77571
Dear Ms. Black:
Regarding your letter dated December 5, 1983, be advised
that Southwestern Bell Telephone Company has no facilities in the
alley inside Block 1097 or South 12th Street between Blocks 1097
and 1098, from Fairmont Parkway to South "K" Street. Also, there
are no facilities in the North 30 feet of the right-of-way of West
"K" Street from the East right-of-way line of South 13th Street,
to the West right-of-way line of New Highway 146, Town of LaPorte,
Harris County, Texas and has no objection to the abandonment and
closing of the above mentioned parcels of land.
Any further requests for telephone service within this
area will require easements or structures provided at the owners
expense and at no cost to the telephone company, to conform to any
future developement.
Any further questions regarding this matter may be directed
to Jim Neas on 473-0595.
Sincerely,
l}J.
Man er-Enginee
Ea
(Design)
c5
e
,
,.
e
.---..-
~',~
....,
,.t.. ",
.
GRAHAM CONSULTANTS
ONE ALLEN CENTER. SUITE 1000
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
OFFICE (713) 759-0965; NIGHT (713) 422-2327
FLI
~
FARII AND LAND
INSTITUTE
IB
REALTOQ'
OTIS GRAHAM, AFLM
December 9, 1983
City of La Porte
P. O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77571
DOROTHY GRAHAM, GRI
As requested, I have appraised two (2) parcels of land, one
being the alley in Block No. 1097 and the other being the 12th
Street between Block No. 1097 and Block No. 1098, City of
La Porte, Texas.
The Purpose of this appraisal was to estimate the Fair Market
Value or said property.
In my opinion the highest and best use of Subject Property is
Commerical.
It is my opinion that the property appraised had a Fair Market
Value as of December 7, 1983 as follows:
Fee Value:
Block No. 1097, alley=
16' X 337.5' = 5,400 slf @ $2.75 slf = $14,850.
Easement Value: 75% of Fee Value ($14,850.) = $11,137.50
Fee Value:
12th Street between Blocks 1097 & 1098:
60' X 362.5'= 21,750 slf @ $2.75 slf = $59,812.50
Easement Value: 75% of Fee Value ($59,812.50) = $44,859.38
Total Easement Value $55,996.88
The attached Appraiser's Qualifications and Contingent & Limiting
Conditions are made a part hereof.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that I have personally examined the property
appraised; that the statements contained in this appraisal and
upon which the opinions expressed herein are based are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, subject to the
limiting conditions herein set forth; that to the best of my
knowledge and belief no pertinent in formation has been over-
looked or withheld; that neither the employment to make this
appraisal nor the compensation is contingent upon the value of
the property; and that I have no interest present or contemp-
lated in the property appraised or in any proceeds to be
derived therefrom.
I 1\
Respectfully sugmitted,
/Ia;~f --
~tis O"raham, AFLM
Appraiser
alP
~
..
,4
e
......--..-
.. ,.....
~
GRAHAM CONSULTANTS
ONE ALLEN CENTER, SUITE 1000
HOUSTO N. TEXAS 77002
OFFI!=E (7'3) 759.0965; NIGHT (713) (22.2327
~~l
.... ... t..allC'
-"","I
.~.
DOROTHY GRAHJ..M. GRI
OTIS GRAHAM. AFLM
APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS
,. .OF
OTIS GR.~HP.M
Accredited F2rm and Land Me~ber No. 3~6
Texas Fa~~ and Land Broke~ of the Year - 1981
Past President of the Bay Area Eoard of ?~ALTORS
Past Director of t~e Texas Assoc~ation of REALTO~S for 9 years
:Member of N2tional Association of REALTORS
Member of Texas Association of REALTORS
Member Houston Board of REALTORS
Member of Farm & Land .Institute of the National Association
of REJl.LTORS
Member of Texas Chapter of the Farm & Land Institute
.~ttended Appraisal I.nsti tut.e Coarses
Appraisal Clients include the following:
Probate Courts
A ttcrnej's
State District Courst
Propert~' Owners
Banks
T~ust Departments
Savings & Loan Associations
Insurance Companies
City of Bay town, Texas
City of La P~rte, Texas
County Of Chambers, Tex2s
:County or"Barris, T,xas
Industries
Utility Companies "
Have testified as ~n appra~se~ in the following:
County Courts
State District Cour.ts
U. S. District Courts
Own 2nc operate Real
Estate Co~s~ltant.
e.7
.=.:-aCr: E:""c ~E=
;: ., r'
b~--....,=-tc!:'
,.
",
.
{". ,
..
e
,
,.
e
"- ----
~:-1!
: .:
CONTINGENT .AND LIHITING CONDITIONS
This appraisal is subject to the following conditions:
The legal description furnished me is assumed to be
correct. ~'assume no responsi?ility for matters legal
in character, no do I render any opinions as to the
title, which is .assumed to be good. 'Any existing liens
and encUmbrances have been disregarded and the property'
appraised as though free and clear under responsible
,ownership.and competent management.
( .
I'have made no survey and assume no responsibility in
connection with such matters.
'I believe' to' be reliable the information identified in
this report as being furnished by others, but I ass~e
no respons~bility for its ~ccur~cy.
Possession of this report or copy thereof does not carry
with it the right of publication. It may not be used for
any purpose by anyone other than the applic~nt without
the ,previous written consent of the appraiser.
.
I am not required to give testimony or attendance in
court by reason of this appraisal with reference to the
property in question unless arrangements 'have been m~de
therefor previously.
eo
e
e
MEMORANDUM
May 3, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: Alfred Garcia - Sewer Extension
Mr. Garcia'has requested to speak to Council regarding
extending a sewer line to his property in order that he may
move a house there.
. . .
CITY OF LA PORTE
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
.
. TO: ~N
FROM: AULISSEN
.
SUBJECT: UTILITIES
. DATE: 5/3/84
.
.
Listed below are excerpts of the city's requirements for utilities.
Mr. Garcia is apparently asking for utilities to his proposed building
site at lots 11-20 block 159. This site is within 200 feet of
sanitary sewer service. Section 26-3 (a) of the Code of Ordinances
states the following:
.
.
(a) REQUIRED SEWER CONNECTIONS. Any owner, agent or occupant of
any property located within two hundred (200) feet of any street
or alley or of any lot or tract of land abutting upon any street
or alley along which extends any sewer or system of sewerage
collection previously constructed or which may be hereafter
constructed by the city, who shall construct, keep, maintain, use
or permit to be used upon such property or premises any water
closet, privy, sink, drain or other receptacle of sewerage not
duly connected with such city sewer or sewerage collection system
so that its contents are made to empty into such sewer or system
of sewerage collection, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
.
.
.
.
The current Utility Extension Agreement requires that the owner pay
for the total actual cost of utility extensions. This requirement is
outlined in section (5) of the Extension Agreement.
.
Subject to the provisions of this agreement, City hereby agrees to
the construction and installation of said installation of utility
main(s) according to the plans and specification to be prepared by
the Owner's engineer and approved by the City. Upon completion
and approval of plans and specifications City will place the
project for bid. When bids are received they shall be tabulated
by the City and a copy of said tabulation shall be provided to
City and Owner. Thereafter, Owner shall deposit with the City in
escrow a sum equal to the amount by the lowest responsible chosen
bidder, plus a sum equal to the estimated construction staking and
inspection fees if applicable. When said deposit has been made by
Owner, City shall authorize construction of said extension(s). It
is agreed and understood that the deposited escrow amount made by
Owner does not relieve Owner from paying for any unforseen
costs/or cost overruns in the project that result from
circu~stances beyond the control of the City.
If I can supply you with any other information please contact me.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
.
MEMORANDUM
May 3, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: Doug Latimer - P & Z Update
Mr. Latimer has requested to come before Council to give
'a report on work the'Planning & Zoning Commission has been
doing and the direction they hope to take in the future.
e .
DECKER McKIM, INC, REAL TORs<ID
222 North 16th Street, P.O. Box 1711, La Porte, Texas 77571 . (713) 471-3633
December 2, 1983
City of La Porte
P.O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77571
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed please find my check in the amount of $100.00
as application fee to close the following streets and
alley:
The alley inside Block 1097, Town of La Porte.
South 12th Street between Blocks 1097 and 1098,
Town of La Porte, from Fairmont Parkway to South "K"
Street.
The North 30 feet of the Right-of-Way of West "K"
Street from the Eas't Right-of-Way line of South
13th Street, to the W'est Right-of-Way line of
New' Highway 146.
Time is of the essence and I appreciate anything you can
do to expedite this matter.
Very truly yours,
DM/jf
IB
REAL TOR~
COUNTY RECORDING
VOL. PG.
CITY OF LA PORTE
SURVEY 2 ~
OR --S...- ~
ADDITION
r-o.~f'iY'b""t ~1~LUQf
1[)91
BLOCK
OR
ABSTRACT NO.
"
-
~
e
1
do<-
/tYn
1&.... -"" I&"~
II) I 32
N
2 31
3 30
.. 4 29
5 II
8 27
7 26
~ +
8 25 Gv
""
. ...
-j-
9 24 'Q
,)--
OJ +\
-
10 - 23 "tS
ct; ----
II 22
12 21
/3 20
14 19
/:5 18
II) 16 17
N
~ u..)2 \.5 t K- g
+-
cJ
C\J
>-
-,-
'--;)
-=A
~
.......
-'
e
e
{
GRAHAM CONSULTANTS
ONE ALLEN CENTER, SUITE 1000
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
OFFICE (713) 759-0965; NIGHT (713) 422-2327
FLI
~
FARM AND LAND
INSTITUTE
,00
REALTOR.
OTIS GRAHAM, AFLM
December 9, 1983
City of La Porte
P. O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77571
DOROTHY GRAHAM, GRI
As requested, I have appraised two (2) parcels of land, one
being the alley in Block No. 1097 and the other being the 12th
street between Block No. 1097 and Block No. 1098, City of
La Porte, Texas.
The Purpose of this appraisal was to estimate the Fair Market
Value or said property.
In my opinion the highest and best use of Subject Property is
Commerical.
It is my opinion that the property appraised had a Fair Market
Value as of December 7, 1983 as follows:
Fee Value:
Block No. 1097, alley~
~6' X 337.5' = 5,400 slf @ $2.75 slf = $14,850.
Easement Value: 75% of Fee Value ($14,850.) = $11,137.50
Fee Value:
12th Street between Blocks 1097 & 1098:
60' X 362.5'= 21,750 slf @ $2.75 slf = $59,812.50
Easement Value: 75% of Fee Value ($59,812.50) = $4'4',859.38
Total Easement Value $55,996.88
The attached Appraiser's Qualifications and Contingent & Limiting
Conditions are made a part hereof.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that I have personally examined the property
appraised; that the statements contained in this appraisal and
upon which the opinions expressed herein are based are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, subject to the
limiting conditions herein set forth; that to the best of my
knowledge and belief no pertinent in formation has been over-
looked or withheld; that neither the employment to make this
appraisal nor the compensation is contingent upon the value of
the property; and that I have no interest present or contemp-
lated in the property appraised or in any proceeds to be
derived therefrom.
itted,
AFLM
.-
4It e
GRAHAM CONSULTANTS
ONE ALLEN CENTER, SUITE 1000
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
OFFI~E (713) 759.0965: NIGHl (713) (22.2327
OllS GFlAHAM. AFLM
. -',
. ' '~~'Jr
~ -'7. ....
.:&.~.-:.,
.... ... ".C
_n","&
LB.
.. ......
APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS
DOROTHY GRAHJ.M. GRI
.' ,OF
OTIS GRAHA)\~
Accredited Farm and Land Member No. 3~6
Texas Fa~m and Land Broker of the Year - 1981
Past President of the Bay Area Eoard of ?~ALTORS
'Past Director of the Texas' Assoc~ation of REALTORS for 9 years
~Member of National Association or REALTORS
Member of Texas Association of REALTORS
Member Houston Board of REALTORS
Member of Farm & Land ,Institute of the National Association
of REALTORS
Member of Texas Chapter of ~he Farm & Land Institute
Attended Appraisal Institute Coarses
. .
Appraisal Clients include the following:
Probate Courts
Attorneys
~tate District C~urst
Propert~r Owners
Banks
T:r.-ust Department's
Savings & Loan Associations
Insurance Companies
City of Bay town, Texas
City of La P~rte, Texas
County of Chambers, Texas
:County of'~arris, T,xas
Industries
Utility Companies '
, ,
Have testified as ~ appra'i se:- in the follo\tfing:
County Courts
State District Courts
u. S. 'Distri ct Courts
Own ana operate Real Esta~e Cons~ltant. E~ckE~2~e ~~~ 6~~-~~c~'
..
-.
.: .
e
e
, .'
CONTINGENT .AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
,-
, '
This appraisal is subject to the following conditions:
The legal description furnished me is assumed to be
correct. I"assume no responsibility for ~atters legal
.
i~ch~racter, no do I render any opinions as to the
. ti tle, ~hich is ,as~umed to be good. 'Any existing l.ien~
and encUmbrances have been disregarded and the property" , .
appraised as though free and clear under responsible
: ownership .and competent management.
.,
l J
I'have made no survey and assume no responsibility in
connection with such matters.
'I believe. to. be reliable the information identified in
this report, as being furnished by others, but I ass~e
no responsibility for its ~ccur~cy.
Possession of this report or copy thereof does not'carry
with it the right of publication. It may not be used for
any purpose by anyone ot~er than the applicant without
the ,previous written consent of the appraiser.
.
I am not required to give testimony or attendance in
court by reason of this appraisal with reference to the
property in question unless arrangements 'have been made
therefor previously.
, I
~.
'.
,
e.
, I
. ~
I
. ~'l.Jn-~.t LUrP-vk.1'!( ~ - 7J 1~0{l 1j Iftf .
I . 00
.t,.? . . fJ. Y.h .
" ,
/
/. (! 4c to t2t. CL{A/" . ~ !7 7t1A.r'l.- (!&;/l-<Y. t: 0 (p :,.
dJ P-f4~ . 9u<Avd(h~~ ~:(}9P''YI'
. A ~1L.G-1.) . Ad... 'rh~v 0: s 3p fl],
. 711 ynt''-~~. .. . . .
I II a--,
,6': '. 4/d.(t. .
. IJ., ~cf7l/ -.dW-:-:tt'..,u
, .
, I< ~ a~~rv.;v .
g1,uC!JZi&<-<:.,J
. · q\'*k.-u- .
I
,
~
..;1
.:~;
~; I )-...)
I
J.t01'liV
i t~_C/
S- ~~.
~e ~. T'rl'8trJ'V n,~ 1(", I C; g i
r;r:ca. . ! J I 1/7" t,' ): \.-. h 'ltL f' / (p, /1 g </
. ul . 1.1
j
_....J
ad~L . g;3o
..
. .
I
.~
)}
.e
e
: . f)J/~L~ 711L-~;;u l-!.~)/~~~ 7'4kd'~
e~U4 L " (~. - .n [.
I . . _'. ~ . ~7.7'Lrt/Ci,-, i . . .' ,V~~ /lY1. ,--/<'l/1'l.1-
'il--vLL /?;>u/~~ >. . 8~u Y'/J. . ./ _ ~wruJ
RiluJ:.. Ililu..1J . :r(!f.I3'. .. . ~/~ .
, j.J . U~L~ . O-.t~e . ~.v . .
:A(~L'<4 ~tClA~lA-~l/ 7 7rH q .
I (f L;.' "
. . : ~~ "[;JtfL-t 'C-c ,v '. ,
, ~ e04- {l-l. . .
: / (. ,. i'n~t...-o ./1 :4t[.(/L.< ct-.'. _... _.
'-3 ~~~d_. &rb;nL,,)
.'
. -.-
/. ~A~-~
. ., ., . ~.;L.a.e-r.)
~~~ .;{..fJ.ddL!.
If? ./~~~~
:3 t- JJ4
~ .a-vL1 .. . :
,.
/.~
L.
I
'!f'
.. ~. '\
. .
-
.
,., ')
\.
c...:'
AGENDA
WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD
MAY 9, 1984, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL ,i
604 WEST FAIRMONT PARKWAY, LA PORTE, TEXAS, BEGINNING 'AT
6:00 P.M. r
A 1-;(., 2.
B I
1. CALL TO ORDER
ALFRED GARCIA - REGARDING SEWER EXTENSION
3. DOUG LATIMER - PLANNING & ZONING STATUS REPORT
. J>>v
~ J - <2 4 .~SCUSS THE REQUEST OF DECKER McKIM TO CLOSE 12th'
f7I r2~t..tj .'prrt ,I V STREET BETWEEN BLOCKS 1097 AND 1098 AND ALLEY INSIDE
'0 ~ ~ llo .<6,- BLOCK 1097 - J. Owen
.~uv .
D I-;l., 5.M'iStscuss PURCHASE OF SOFTWARE TO BE INSTALLED ON MICROCOMPUTERS
/V Q2~(.(a 1'I"rt\,t AT PUBLIC WORKS - J. Hodge
\Y ~.I'" ...~\(.
E 1-4'" 6. DISCUSS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT WITH : TURNER
t COLLIE & BRADEN, INC. - J. Owen I
(}tvQ.{. :-:t.. K.'l
'W~.( It-.'" ^:..l.r
P^'~ of, ~t'.t c:ff'. ADJOURNMENT
; \ ;.1 :"( ..~ .....~ ~~...
'. .' .
'. "~ i :.1 . ~ ~ : :.;" J tJ
j \j U :l JL>m ~
';, : ("'t"T f\ ~ :t~
: .,~ .:{.~ /;'1 '.~ '~ :: Ii ".; .,~
.~ ; .i :: ~ ..;~. J
~ ~ ~~.,...J j \oj ~01
~! ~~,F~ ~ ~::a
~ j!n~C
("f.~.~ \ ~;'.. ;~;i'~~~~~ :
. ..;.:......,"'" . :,.. ,'.:2 I
\: .'i~: .' ..!~..:~. ; ",: ~~ .: i
..../ ~ ....J ud '"" ........Ju.za :
@ Cfhu;-. ~'^-lJd4u.~..v~~
~. ~. kiJ' ~ ~a'~,,2 f'-'
(J~~~) ..
@
,~
.~
,
J
I
....
e
,
...
'r
.
"---...-.
....-: ....!!
MEMORANDUM
May 3, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: Alfred Garcia - Sewer Extension
Mr. Garcia'has requested to speak to Council regarding
extending a sewer line to his property in order that he may
move a house there.
III
. . ~;. ;....l.... .
~ .~ . I .
,.'
\"
(.
('
(
(
(
r
'I,
!'
\~
r
...
(
(
<.
(
'-
(
c
(
(
!
'-
t_
t.
\..
"'!'
e
I
...
e
"- --...~-
CITY OF LA PORTE
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~N
~AULISSEN
UTILITIES
5/3/84
DATE:
Listed below are excerpts of the city's requirements for utilities.
Mr. Garcia is apparently asking for utilities to his proposed building
site at lots 17-20 block 759. This site is within 200 feet of
sanitary sewer service. Section 26-3 (a) of the Code of Ordinances
states the following:
(a) REQUIRED SEWER CONNECTIONS. Any owner, agent or occupant of
any property located within two hundred (200) feet of any street
or alley or of any lot or tract of land abutting upon any street
or alley along which extends any sewer or system of sewerage
collection previously constructed or which may be hereafter
constructed by the city, who shall construct, keep, maintain, use
or permit to be used upon such property or premises any water
closet, privy, sink, drain or other receptacle of sewerage not
duly connected with such city sewer or sewerage collection system
so that its contents are made to empty into such sewer or system
of sewerage collection, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The current Utility Extension Agreement requires that the owner pay
for the total actual cost of utility extensions. This requirement is
outlined in section (5) of the Extension Agreement.
Subject to the provisions of this agreement, City hereby agrees to
the construction and installation of said installation of utility
main(s) according to the plans and specification to be prepared by
the Owner's engineer and approved by the City. Upon completion
and approval of plans and specifications City will place the
project for bid. When bids are received they shall be tabulated
by the City and a copy of said tabulation shall be provided to
City and Owner. Thereafter, Owner shall deposit with the City in
~scrow a sum equal to the amount by the lowest responsible chosen
bidder, plus a sum equal to the estimated construction staking and
inspection fees if applicable. When said deposit has been made by
Owner, City shall authorize construction of said extension(s). It
is agreed and understood that the deposited escrow amount made by
Owner does not relieve Owner from paying for any unforseen
costs/or cost overruns in the project that result from
circumstances beyond the control of the City.
If I can supply you with any other information please contact me.
A.<,
~
('
(
(
(
(
(
(
:{
(
{
'"
Ii...
(
(
(
e
<.
<.
L
i...
;:J'
i.
'-
"
~
-
.1
..
e
........--.._~
.... ~
MEMORANDUM
May 3, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: Doug Latimer - P & Z Update
Mr. Latimer has requested to come before Council to give
a report on work the'Planning & Zoning Commission has been
doing and the direction they hope to take in the future.
131
. ~ ..,. .
. ~~."..
..,
e
e
....--
r-::::: 1
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA PORTE
TO: Mayor Cline and Counci1persons
FROM: Jack Otven
SUBJECT: Closing of 12th Street and Alley
DATE: May 4, 1984
Mr. Walker Nichols and Mr. Decker McKim are anxious to get
a building permit to start construction of a strip shopping
center. The closing of this section of 12th Street and the
alley is essential to the construction of the shopping center.
The closing of 12th Street will require the relocation of
a large sewer line. The exact location of the sewer line
is dependent upon a future request to close 14th Street.
Mr. Nichols has agreed to pay all costs of relocating the
sewer line along with any other extra costs caused by the
street closing. I see no problem with this particular
request, however, we are still working with Mr. Nichols
concerning the prob1e31s involved with his tentative request
to close 14th Street.
Q~
~ ack Owen
JO/11h
attachments
(!.,/
..,
e
e
---.-
~.
DECKER McKIM, INC, REAL TORgID
222 North 16th Street, P,O, Box 1711, La Porte, Texas 77571 · (713) 471-3633
December 2, 1983
City of La Porte
P.O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77571
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed please find my check in the amount of $100.00
as application fee to close the following streets and
alley:
The alley inside Block 1097, Town of La Porte.
South 12th Street between Blocks 1097 and 1098,
Town of La Porte, from Fairmont Parkway to South "K"
Street.
The North 30 feet of the Right-of-Way of West "K"
Street from the East Right-of-Way line of South
13th Street, to the W'es't Right-of-Way line of
New' Highway 146.
Time is of the essence and I appreciate anything you can
do to expedite this matter.
Very truly yours,
DE~~CKIM, INC.,_REALTORS
~~~~- -
De~~Ki~"
DM/jf
m
REALTOR@)
(!;'/.,
COUNTY RECORDING
VOL. PG.
CITY OF LA PORTE
SU~~EY ~ .
ADDITION
FCl~f'(Y'lb,,,t '\b'~ldlf
\ ()") '1
BLOCK
OR
ABSTRACT NO.
,.
e
e
i
,
!
~
~
'1\
m
00<.
/()~
I~" lit':')
If) I 32
...
2 31
3 30
4 29
5 21
e 21
7 26
~ +
I 25 (.'"
G"
. ...
-;-
9 24 'Q
'>-
OJ +-l
-
10 - 23 ~
ct; -
II 22
12 21
13 20
14 19
15 IS
1ft 16 17
N
~ Lc)2 ...c, i K ~
+-
'(.,l
c"
...
-r-
';.~
--ri
,.~
.......
~
()J
~
.
,
,6
e
....-----
.... ---.::!
EN I EX. P. O. BOX 937. lA PORTE, TEXAS 77571
December 14, 1983
Cherie Black
City Secretary
City of La Porte, Texas, 77571
HE: Vacate, abandon and close;
1. Alley inside Block 1097,
2. South 12th Street between Blocks
1097 and 1098 from S.P.L. of Fair-
mont Parkv.;ay to N. P. L. of ~1 est K.
Street.
J. The north 30' of the right-of-way
of ~est K. Street from the East
right-of-way line of South 13th
Street, to the 'jest ri~ht-of-way
line of New Highway 140.
Dear Mrs. Black,
In request ril and }2, Entex does not have
any gas mains in described portions of 12th street.
~~e hereby release and abandon our rights to the
above described easement in Block 1097 and described
portion of 12th Street, provided similar releases
are obtained from the other utility, companies hav-
ing the right to said street.
In request /:/3, Entex does have an existing 6"
gas main in said described portion of West K. Street
running vJest to East which serves the City of La-
Porte and the Bayshore area.
We do not release this portion of West K.
Street as this gas main is vital to our operations.
However, to maintain its existence, options can be
worked out.
Sincerely,
$ c:~~d"g
~r. ~. C. Randall,
Local Manager, En~ex
La Porte; Texas
~JCR/.i c
cc: ~r. Jim Acklen
c.,4
.
"
.-
.
'--
~ ..
E. J. Carey
Manager-Engineering (Design)
East District
@
Southwestern Bell
207 S. Munger
Room 101
Pasadena, Texas 77506
December 6, 1983
Ms. Cherie Black
City of LaPorte
Assistant City Secretary
P. O. Box 1115
LaPorte, Texas 77571
Dear Ms. Black:
Regarding your letter dated December 5, 1983, be advised
that Southwestern Bell Telephone Company has no facilities in the
alley inside Block 1097 or South 12th Street between Blocks 1097
and 1098, from Fairmont Parkway to South "K" Street. Also, there
are no facilities in the North 30 feet of the right-of-way of West
"K" Street from the East right-of-way line of South 13th Street,
to the West right-of-way line of New Highway 146, Town of LaPorte,
Harris County, Texas and has no objection to the abandonment and
closing of the above mentioned parcels of land.
Any further requests for telephone service within this
area will require easements or structures provided at the owners
expense and at no cost to the telephone company, to conform to any
future developement.
Any further questions regarding this matter may be directed
to Jim Neas on 473-0595.
Sincerely,
tt.
Man er-Enginee
Eas
(Design)
c5
.
.
....----
~ "
.....
.> ,-
.
GRAHAM CONSULTANTS
ONE ALLEN CENTER, SUITE 1000
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
OFFICE (713) 759-0965; NIGHT (713) 422-2327
FLI
~
FARM AND LAND
INSTITUTE
m
;,t..lh....Il.
OTIS GRAHAM, AFLM
December 9, 1983
City of La Porte
P. O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77571
DOROTHY GRAHAM, GRI
As requested, I have appraised two (2) parcels of land, one
being the alley in Block No. 1097 and the other being the 12th
street between Block No. 1097 and Block No. 1098, City of
La Porte, Texas.
The Purpose of this appraisal was to estimate the Fair Market
Value or said property.
In my opinion the highest and best use of Subject Property is
Commerical.
It is my opinion that the property appraised had a Fair Market
Value as of December 7, 1983 as follows:
Fee Value:
Block No. 1097, alley:
16' X 337.5' = 5,400 slf @ $2.75 slf = $14,850.
Easement Value: 75% of Fee Value ($14,850.) = $11,137.50
Fee Value:
12th Street between Blocks 1097 & 1098:
60' X 362.5'= 21,750 slf @ $2.75 slf = $59,812.50
Easement Value: 75% of Fee Value ($59,812.50) = $44',8'59.38
Total Easement Value $55,996.88
The attached Appraiser's Qualifications and Contingent & Limiting
Conditions are made a part hereof.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that I have personally examined the property
appraised; that the statements contained in this appraisal and
upon which the opinions expressed herein are based are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, subject to the
limiting conditions herein set forth; that to the best of my
knowledge and belief no pertinent in formation has been over-
looked or withheld; that neither the employment to make this
appraisal nor the compensation is contingent upon the value of
the property; and that I have no interest present or contemp-
lated in the property apprai~ed or in any proceeds to be
derived therefrom.
Respectfully sugmitted,
I 'L/
~//J::-.,.t" --
~tis Graham, AFLM
Appraiser
at.,
..
.
.
...---.-
~1
GRAHAM CONSULTANTS
ONE ALLEN CENTER, SUITE 1000
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
OFFI~E (7'3) 759.0965; NIGHT (7'3) '22-:2327
, FL'-',
~-=-j'"'' '
':":::0... -:"~~..
.... .... Lac
-.' "'" I
rn
. ........
DOROTHY GRAHI.M. G;:U
OTIS GRA.HA.M. AFlM
APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS
, .O?
OTIS GR.ll.HAM
Accredited Farm and Land Member No. 346
Texas Fa~~ and Land Broke~ of the Year - 1981
Past President of the Bay Area Eoard of P.~ALTORS
Past Director of t~e Texas Asso~~aticn of REALTO~S for 9 years
Member of National Association of REALTORS
Member of Texas Association of REALTORS
Me~ber Houston Board of REALTORS
Member of Farm & Land ,Institute of the National Association
of REALTORS
Member of Texas Chapter of the Farm & Land Institute
Attended Appraisal Institut~ Coarses
Appraisal Clients include the fOllowing:
Probate Courts
Attcrne;ys
State District Courst
Propert~r Owners
Banks
T~ust Departments
Savings & Loan Associations
Insurance Companies
City of Bay town, Texas
City of La Porte, Texas
County of Chambers, Texas
:County of'Earris, T,xas
Industries
Utility Companies '
Have testified as ~n appra'ise~ in the follolr:ing:
County Courts
State District Courts
U. S. District Courts
Own anc ope~ate Real Es~at= CO~~~l~ent. ~~c~e~r.kP ~~~ ~~__~~~~~
~,.,
.
..
.'
.'
.
('.
..
.
.
----
~~
: ;
CONTINGENT ,AND LIH!TING CONDITIONS
This appraisal is subject, to the following conditions:
The legal description furnished me is ass~~ed to be
correct. I'assume no responsi~ility for ~atters legal
in character, no do I render any opinions as to the
title, which is .assumed to be good. 'Any existing liens
and encUmbrances have been disregarded and the property'
appraised as though free and clear under responsible
,ownership .and competent management.
1 -
1'have made no survey and assume no responsibility in
connection with such matters.
'I believe'to'be reliable the information identified in
this report as being furnished by others, but I ass~e
no respons~bility for its accur~cy.
Possession of this report or copy thereof does not carry
with it the right of publication. It may not be used for
any purpose by anyone other than the ap?lic~nt without
the ,previous written consent of the appraiser.
.
I am not required to give testimony or attendance in
court by reason of this appraisal with reference to the
property in question unless arrangernents'have been made
therefor previously.
e.K
:.
.
...
.
---
.... ..,
~
~
TO:
CITY MANAGER
FROM:
Public Works Direc~or
,D~TE: : : ,May 1, 1984
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL" AGENDA ITEM
2.
xx
Report
1. Agenda Date Requested:
May 9, 1984
Resolution
Ordinance
3. Project Summary:
Purchase Work Management System
provide management information.
are{r.eady at this time.
tir&
Action Required:
software and two (2) microcomputers to
Hardware has been bid, but Be recommendations
4.
Authorize the expenditure of $25,767 for the purchase of software and
hardware.
5., Alt'ernative:
Do not purchase system.
6.' Recommendat~on
Autho~ize purchase.
7.' Exhibits:
Attached.
8. Availability of Funds:
General Fund
y Water/Wastewater
Capital Improvmt.
General Revenue Sharing
Other
Account Number: 003-806-806-801
Funds Available: X
Yes _~o
9.
Jerry L. Hodge, Director of Public Wo:
Requested By
Counc il Agenda
5~./-f~'",
Date /
RECEIVE
~S- f - ~ ~
D J
11
.
.
...
.
.
'.,
--
..... :..-:
(
CITY OF LA PORTE
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
DATE: April 30, 1984
TO:
FROM:
Public Works
The Public Works Department is currently reviewing a proposal for a Work
Management System from L~'W Inc. Group.
The Work Management System utilizes microcomputers and provides management
information in two related areas:
1. Backlog of pending jobs, including recurring work, planned
work, and on-demand calls for service, and;
2. Work performed, including a description of the task, where it
was performed, resources utilized, special characteristics,
and quantity of work.
This information will help to evaluate productivity, develop the most
effective work plans and schedules, and allocate resources. The proposal
is to provide professional services which include installing the Work
Management System in computer programs on a desk top computer and assisting
management in performing related implementation tasks.
The total cost of software (on two computers), consulting, and expenses come
to $14,700. Adding the cost of hardware will bring the total to $25,767.
Members of LWFW will gladly discuss the system and its benefits before City
Council at a predetermined time.
If you should have any questions, please advise.
JLH/lw
D..~
- ';+;:~'~.'~." '.~ -=-.- .
.~::~:'~~~~.~. ."'-~ ~~~"i~~J.'-"
"
.
1
.
.
'--
--.
r.= .-:
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA PORTE
TO:
Mayor Cline and Counci1persons
Jack Owen
FROM:
SUBJECT: La Porte Sanitary Sewer Improvements Contract with
Turner Collie & Braden, Inc.
DATE:
May 3, 1984
Attached is a proposed contract with support data submitted
by T~rner Collie & Braden, Inc. for certain sanitary sewer
improvements. The Staff has conferred with TC & B concerning
this draft but has not had time to review it in the present
form. A meeting has been scheduled for May 8th for a con~lete
review of the proposed contract.
One of the conditions imposed by the Texas Water Commissi.on
for the sale of the College View Bonds is that an engineering
contract be executed no later than June 24, 1984.
We are, therefore, placing this item on the May 9th Workshop
enda .
Ie
JO/11h
attachment
E./
. .'.. ".". .': .
~,
.
1
.
. -- ---
..... .-:
9
TurnerCollieC6Braden Inc.
H. CECIL ALLEN
VICE PRESIDENT
PO BOX 13089
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77219
5757 WOOOWAV
713780-4100
TELEX 774185 TCB HOU
April 30, 1984
Mr. Jack OWen
City Manager
City of La Porte
P.O.' Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77551
Re: La Porte Sanitary Sewer System Improvements
Turner Collie & Braden Job No. 13-02000-010
Dear Jack,
We are happy to present two (2) draft copies of an Agreement
for Engineering Services for your review for the above ref-
erenced project.
We estimate that the probable Total Construction Costs for the
project will be $7,721,000 (see Attachment "A"). We propose
to provide engineering for the Basic Services outlined in this
Agreement for $400,000 (see Attachment "A") and we estimate
that the Special Services will be approximately $315,000 (see
Attachment "A"), should the City authorize full time cons.truc-
tion Project Representatives for both construction contracts.
If the City elects to furnish one or more of the project
Representatives or elects to have only part time services
provided on one or more of the construction contracts, the
cost would be less. The responsibilities of the construction
Project Representatives will include on-site observation of
construction, review of materials and workmanship, preparation
of daily written reports, and daily communication and co-
ordination with the contractors. Basically, the Project
Representative's function is to see that the construction work
is completed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
Attachment "B" represents a breakdown of probable construction
costs into those attributable to abandonment of the College
View MUD wastewater treatment facility and conveyance of its
flow to the existing city main wastewater treatment facility
and those that can be attributed directly to the growth of
the City of La Porte.
Attachment "c" presents the general tasks required to complete
this project and includes both Basic Services and Special
Service items.
E-':l-
CONSULTING ENGINEERS. TEXAS AUSTIN/OALLAS/El PASO/HOUSTON/PORT ARTHUR COLORADO DENVER/CRAND JUNCTION
,-
.
1
'.
.
- ---...-
...... :...:
f)
"
Turner Collie <f1Braden Inc.
April 30, 1984
Mr. Jack Owen
City of La Porte
Page Two
Attachment "0" is an analysis of basic services engineering
fees for a project of this size based on the fee curves shown
in the TSPE manual. Our proposed fee for basic services is
$85,000 below the fee calculated from the curves. This amount
represents the value of the recently completed Comprehensive
Wastewater Collection and Treatment Plan as it applies to this
project, plus the value of other work we performed for the City.
Attachment "E" presents the resumes of the key personnel involved
in this project. The resumes of the Principal in Charge, Project
Director, alternate Project Director, Project Manager and Project
Engineers are included, along with the resumes of several of the
primary design engineers available to work on this assignment.
We propose to complete the Preliminary Design and Final Design
phases within 180 days after authorization (150 days to complete
work and 30 days for approval of plans and specifications) for
the Fairmont Parkway Relief Sewer and within 240 days after
authorization (210 days to complete work and 30 days for approval
of plans and specifications) for the Expansion of the Main
Wastewater Treatment Facility. All work outlined in Paragraphs
II.A. and II.B. of the Agreement will be finished within 45
days after authorization.
Should you or your staff wish to discuss any of the information
presented here in more detail, we would be happy to do so. - We
appreciate the opportunity to submit this Agreement for Engineer-
i~g Services for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
W4~~
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
Project Director
HCA:RCR:lf
Attachments
cc: Jerry Hodge w/attachments
John Joerns w/attachments
&/1
.
.
...
r
- ---..-
~
"
e
..... :-..:
Attachment "A"
Ia. Porte Sanitary Sewer System Irnproverrertts
A. Construction COsts
1. Relief Sanitary Sewer
2. Main Sewage Treatment Plant Expansion
3. Modificaticns to Co1~ege VieM Lift Station
Total Construction Cost*
B. Engineering 'Costs
1. Basic Services
a. Special studies and Reports Phase
b. Preliminary Design Phase
c. Final Design Phase
d. Construction Phase
Subtotal Basic Services
2. Special Services
a. Sw:veys
b. Geoteclmica1 Work
c. Miscellaneous Engineering Assignments
d. Project Representatives
Subtotal Special Services
Total Engineering Costs
Total Costs**
$4,311,000
3,365,000
45,000
$7,721,000
$ 12,000
58,000
252,000
78,000
$ 400,000
$ 30,000
35,000
10,000
240,000
$ 315,000
$ 715,000
$8,436,000
. *Includes 15% Construction Contingencies
**Does not include land costs, legal fees or cost of band sales associated
with Project
6.1
.,
.
~
...
.
.- -----
...- :....
I;
2/27/84
I'
City of La Porte
. .
Fainront Parkway Trunk Sewer
ESTIMATED PROBABLE CCNsrRIJcrICN CQSTS
60" MRCP 5,200 1.f. $ 200 $i,040,000
54" MRCP 8,000 180 1,440,000
48" MRCP 3,500 160 560,000
24" RCP 3,600 60 216,000
21" RCP 2,600 50 130,000
12"FM 6,500 25 162,500
Siphons 4 50,000 200,000
SUbtotal $3,748,500
Contingencies (15%) 562,500
TOI'AL $4,311,000
, .
E~
-
.,
.'
.
...
.....---
"
City of La Porte
.
..... :-.:
2/27/84
Wastewater Treatment Plant EXpansion
ESI'IMATED PROBABLE CCNsrrocrICN coors
Lift station - upgrade existing
- add new station
Headwol:.'ks - modify existing
- add new
Aeration Basins
Final Clarifiers
Aerobic Digester
Return Sludge Purrping Station
Chlorine Contact Basins
Chlorination Facilities
Blowers
Plant Piping
Electrical
Total Plant
Plant Relief Sewer
Subtotal
COntingencies (15%)
TOl'AL
Eb
$ 100,000
500,000
50,000
300,000
400,000
400,000
120',000
200,000
150,000
60,000
60,000
350,000
'130,000
$2,820,000
106,000
$2,926,000
439,000
$3,365,000
,
-
I
...
.....--...-
.,
.
-,
....-: :.-:
Attachrrent liB"
'Breakdown of probable Construction Costs
A. College View MUD Share
22,900 Lf.
6,500 l.f.
4
2
21" Va>
12" F .M.
Siphons
Lift Stations
Subtotal
Contingencies @ 15%
Total Trunk Sewer
Main Sl'P Expansion (including 15% Contingency)
Total - College View MUD Share
B. City of La Porte Share
Total Probable Construction Cost
Total - COllege View MUD Share
Total - City of La Porte Share
C. SU:mnary
COllege view MUD Share = $3,005,000 = 38.9%
City of La Porte Share = $4,716,000 = 61.1%
e 1
$
50
25
50,000
140,000
$1,145,000
162,500
200,000
280,000
$1,787,500
268,500
$2,056,000
949,000
$3,005,000
$7,721,000
3,005,000
$4,716,000
"
-
,
..
e
......-..-
.. :.-:
Attachment "e"
"
",
BreakdoWn of Engineering Tasks
1. Special Studies and Reports Phase
a. Study of ultimate abandonment of College View wastewater plant
b. Study of solids handling at College View wastewater plant
c. Preparation of carpliance schedule for College View MUD waste-
water treatrcent plant
d. Preparation of applications for amendments to existing TDWR and
NPDES (EPA) pennits of main wastewater treatment facility in
conjunction with proposed expansion
e. Preparation of Engineering Reports.
2. Prelimincu:y Design Phase
a. Prelinri.naI:y design of main wastewater treatment facility
b. Preliminary design of relief trunk. sewer
c. Prelimincu:y design of College View MUD ultimate lift station
d. Preparation of Prelimincu:y Design Reports
3. Final Design Phase
a. Preparation of construction contract for main wastewater treatment
facility expansion
b. Preparation of construction contract for relief trunk sewer and
ultimate College view IJ.ft Station
c. Design Sw:veys (Special Services)
d. Geotechnical work (Special Services)
e. Sul:Inission of design to regulatory agencies for approval
f. Fumish Plans and Specifications for bidding purposes.
4. Construction Phase
a. Assist with Advertisement for bids
b. ReOCl['[l[Bld award of contract
c. Assist with preparation of fonnal contract docurrEnts
d. PerfOIIn Basic Services construction phase tasks
e. Provide Resident Project Representatives as authorized (Special Services)
f. Conduct final inspection
g. Reccmrend final acceptance of constructed projects (s).
l:
E. g
-
.
,..
e
'---..-
..-:::::; ~
~ttachrra1t "0"
"
Analysis of Basic Services Engineering Fees
.
Based on Fee Curves
1. Sanital:y Sewer Constructicn Cost
Percent of Construction Cost fran Curve B
Fee = $4,311,000 x 0.053
2. Main SI'P Construction Cost
Percent of Construction Cost fran Curve A
Additional catpensation for Mcxlifications
New Construction = $2,165,000
Mbdificaticns = $1,200,000
Fee - New Construction = $2,165,000 x 0.065
- Modifications = $1,200,000 x 0.065 x 1.33
- Total
= $4,311,000
= 5.3%
= $228,500
=' '$3,365,000
= 6.5%
= 33%
3. Special Studies and Reports Phase Fee
= $140,700
= 103,800
$244,500
= $ 12,000
4. Suntnary - Basic Services Fees
Sanitazy Sewer
Main srp
Special Studies and Reports Phase
Total
$228,500
244,500
12,000
$485,000
: ~
E. 7'
-
~
.-
---..-
I
I'
RESUMES
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
Neil E. Bishop, Ph.D., P.E.
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Peter J. Goldsmith, P.E.
James W. Johnson, F.E.
George o. puig, P.E.
Edward A. Cain, P.E.
William L. Pearson, P.E.
John F. Wells, P.E.
Bradley H. Winkler, P.E.
E.. ;0
e
"
...- -
Attachment "E"
"
'.
>,
,.;.
.
.....---
~.......::
.'
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
Senior Vice President
and Chief Engineer
Principal in Charge
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,
1952, Bachelor of Arts, 195i, Rice University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, Colorado,
Louisiana, New Mexico
Professional
Affiliations
American Consulting Engineers Council
American Society of Civil Engineers
Houston Engineering and Scientific Society
National Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas:
1966-present, Senior Vice President and Chief
Engineer.
Serves as director and treasurer of the corpora-
tion and is experienced in design and related
management and supervision for the firm's muni-
cipal engineering.
Responsible for the operation and management of
the firm's public works, water supply engineer-
ing, planning and engineering studies, plant
services, industrial activities, computerized
systems engineering, acoustical engineering,
and land-use planning.
Directed the engineering, planning, and designs
of water and wastewater projects including the
following.
City of Houston Southeast Water Purification
Plant.
City of Houston Municipal Water System.
Bell County WCID No.1' Surface Water Treatment,
Plant.
Bell County WClD No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Collection
and Treatment System.
Texas A&M Wastewater Collection and Treatment
System.
TurnerColliel6Braden Inc.
t:.. /1
"
,e
...
,e
., --...-
~ -
.'
Cecil Allen, P.E.
Project Director
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1963,
Texas A&M University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1967
Public Surveyor: Texas, 1980
Professional
Affiliations
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Resources Association
Association of Consulting Municipal Engineers
Consulting Engineers Council
Houston Engineering and Scientific Society
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1963-present, Project Director.
Responsible for a project unit that provides plant
engineering services such as preparation of plans
and specifications for water treatment plants,
sewage treatment plants, water supply and distribu-
tion pumping facilities, wastewater lift stations,
and related facilities.
Extensively experienced in serving municipal
clients through design, analysis, and planning of
water and wastewater systems. Design expertise
focuses on water distribution systems, water
supply systems, sanitary sewage collection sys-
tems, and sanitary sewage treatment facilities.
Noteworthy projects reflecting experience include
the following.
Design of wastewater treatment plant enlargements
for Clear Lake City, Bay town, Bay City, and Eagle
Pass. These enlargements were for existing
plants and ranged in size from 1.5 mgd to 4.5
mgd.
Design of first enlargement of City of Houston
West District Sewage Treatment Plant from 2.0 mgd
to 6.0 mgd.
Design of Phase I of the City of Houston South-
east Water Purification Plant. This phase is
to be a l60-mgd increment of an ultimate 720-mgd
facility.
TurnerCollie<f1Braden (nc.
E.' /~
"
e
.1
.
e
-----
.. .-:.
Cecil Allen,
Page Two
P.E.
Experience
Design of 3.0-mgd wastewater plant to ~erve King-
wood Development. Plant was designed to provide
tertiary treatment and to be expanded to 9.0 mgd.
Design of waterlines, wastewater lines, storm
sewers, paving, and elevated tanks for portion
of Kingwood Development (18,000 acre).
TurnerCollie(6Braden Inc.
E. /3
e
I
...
e
'---~-~
..... ~
Neil E. Bishop, Ph.D., P.E.
Project Director
Education
Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering, 1975,
Master of Science in Environmental Health
Engineering, 1968,
The University of Texas at Austin,
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1966,
Arlington State College
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1976
Professional
Affiliations
American Society of CIvil Engineers
American Water Works Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Air Pollution Control Association
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1970-present, Project Director.
Directs the firm's practice in engineering investi-
gations and planning studies in environmental engi-
neering and science, solid waste, water resources,
air pollution, and wastewater. Actively partici-
pates in public hearinns, and is responsible for
all projects entailing hydrologic investigations.
Extensively experienced in conducting planning and,
engineering studies related to wastewater convey-
ance and treatment. Direct expertise focuses on
laboratory treatability studies, operational
troubleshooting, wastewater characterizatlon stud-
ies, and permitting activities.
Completed area-wide (201) Facility Plans for sev-
eral governmental enti t'ies including the City of
Houston, the City of Orange, Clear Lake City Water
Authority, Bell County WCID No.1, and the City of
Galveston. Studies included Sewer System Analysis,
Sewer System Evaluation Studies, and Environmental
Information Documents.
TurnerCollie0Braden Inc.
E.. I if
e
.
..
<
e
.---..-
r-:=; --=
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Project Manager
Education
Master of Engineering in Environmental
Engineering, 1977.
Bachelor of Science in Environmental
Engineering, 1975.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1981;
Florida, 1980
Professional
Affiliations
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1980-present, Manager.
Responsibilities include project management,
supervision and coordination of engineering
design groups, water and wastewater treatment
facility design, preparation of plans and speci-
fications, report writing, preparation of permit
applications, project planning and scheduling,
construction management.
The following is a list of representative
projects.
City of La Porte Main Sewage Treatment Plant
Improvements. Analysis of plant operation~l
problems, evaluation of plant equipment and
design, recommendation of improvements includ-
ing new sludge pumping system, modification of
lift station controls, and control building
ventilation.
City of Alice Northeast Sewage Treatment Plant.
New 2.02-mgd oxidation ditch treatment plant and
a new 1.8-mgd lift station.
City of Alice Southside Sewage Treatment Plant.
Expansion of an existing facility from 2.0 mgd
to 2.7 mgd.
J'
TurnerCollie@Braden Inc.
--'
E I::>
e
\
-
e
---...-
r::::; --=
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Page Two
Experience
Kingwood Place Wastewater Treatment Plant,
Kingwood, Texas. New facility with initial
capacity of 0.75 mgd, ultimate capacity of
3.0 mgd.
Beltway Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase III
Expansion, Houston, Texas. Expansion of the plant
from 4.4-mgd capacity to l3.34-mgd capacity.
Responsible for preparation of final plans, speci-
fications, and contract documents.
Port Acres Wastewater Treatment Plant, Port
Arthur, Texas. Expansion of the plant from
0.4-mgd capacity to 1.9-mgd capacity.
Main Outfall Lift Station, Port Arthur, Texas.
Design of a major sewage lift station with
38.5-mgd capacity.
Gee & Jenson, Inc., West Palm Beach, Florida;
1976-1980, Project Engineer.
Representative projects include the following.
Acme Improvement District Wastewater Treatment
Plant, Wellington, Florida. Design of a 1.5-mgd-
capacity oxidation ditch-type treatment facility.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation,
Deerfield Beach, Florida. Design of modifica-
tions and upgrading of a 4.0-mgd-capacity
contact-stabilization plant.
Wastewater Collection System Expansion, Deerfield
Beach, Florida. Design of 10 pump stations and
approximately 40 miles of gravity and pressure
pipelines to serve developed areas of the city.
,.
TurnerCol/ie@Braden Inc.
16
"
e
e
~....--...-
r.:::; .-:
Peter Goldsmith, P.E.
Project Engineer
Education
Master of Science in Water Resources Technology,
1977, The University of Birmingham, England
Diploma (First Class) Constructional Engineering,
1970, Twickenham College of Technology, England
Registration
Chartered Civil Engineer: United Kingdom
Professional Engineer: Texas
Licensed Irrigator: Texas
Professional
Affiliation
Institution of Civil Engineers, United Kingdom
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1979-present, Project Engineer.
Project Manager for infrastructure design for
Aramco communities at Abqaiq and Udhailiyah,
Saudi Arabia. This project involved the design
of all utility systems, roads, drainage, land-
scaping, and irrigation.
Supervised a project team designing wastewater
collection facilities for the Jubail Industrial
Community being developed on the Arabian Gulf in
Saudi Arabia. Project included eight major pump-
ing stations and associated pipelines.
Project Engineer for the complete preliminary engi-
neering design of the Beltway Sewage Treatment
Plant extension, Houston. '
Designed the drainage pumping station for Terminal
"0" at Houston Intercontinental Airport. This was
a 60.5 mgd station handling stormwater from the
road network and areas around the terminal.
D. Balfour & Sons, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates;
1977-1979, Resident Engineer.
Directed a team of engineers and technicians in
the supervision of construction of the sewage
collection and disposal system, including sewers,
pumping stations, and treatment works for. a
population of 120,000 persons.
TurnerCollie(6Braden Inc.
E.. /7
"
e
.
-
~
....--...-
r:::: -
George O. Puig, P.E.
Project Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Architectural
Engineering, 1968, University of Kansas
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas
Professional
Affiliations
American Concrete Institute
American Society of Civil Engineers
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas:
1969-present, Manager, Construction
Administration.
Responsible for doordination of engineering
services on projects which include water and
sewage treatment plants, and water control
structures. Work includes preliminary reports,
preparation of plans and specifications, con-
struction administration, and the use of
computer-aided design and drafting techniques.
Representative projects include the following.
City of Houston East Water Purification Plant.
Consists of several projects including a separate
facility to treat 50 mgd of potable water, and
enlarging of the existing facility from 80 mgd to
125 mgd capacity: sludge processing facilities:
a flood protection system, and several steel
ground storage tanks.
A 25 mgd addition to an existing water plant for
Bell County WC&ID No. 1 including a 17 mile-long
transmission line and prestressed ground storage
fanilities. Also included an expansion of an
existing sewage treatment plant from 9 mgd to 15
mgd capacity.
City of Houston Southeast Water Purification
Plant. A new 160 mgd water purification plant
with an ultimate capacity of 750 mgd.
Sewage treatment facilities for Clear Lake City,
Kingwood, Texas A&M Univeristy, and many smaller
installations.
Finney and Turnipseed, Topeka, Kansas: 1967-1969,
Designer.
TurnerCollie<9Braden Inc.
IE /$1
e
.
...
e
.....--...-
r=: :.-:
James W. Johnson, Jr., P.E.
Project Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1973,
Clemson University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1981;
Virginia, 1977
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
197B-present, Project Engineer.
Noteworthy projects include the following:
City of Alice, Texas and Alice Water Authority,
Raw Water Transmission Pipeline. Mechanical and
civil design of 20.S-mile 30-inch steel cylinder
reinforced concrete pipeline to include the addi-
tion of a 400-Hp raw water pump to an existing
pump station, metering facilities, pipeline surge
analysis, air release valve locations, and pipe
bend thrust restraints.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Tanajib Community Update.
Analyzed projected population density and associ-
ated water and wastewater demands and recommended
improvements to the utility system to include pot-
able water distribution system line sizes, distri-
bution pumpage and storage, water treatment plant
capacity, wastewater treatment plant and lift
station capacities, and wastewater gravity sewer
collection system line sizes.
HCUD No.5 (Kingwood). Offsite 1,SOO-gpm water
well including well and well pump design, piping,
and control building.
Copperfield Sewage Treatment Plant, Harris County,
Texas. Structural design of reinforced concrete
structures, steel frame building, and lift station
steel hoist frame.
Velsicol Chemical Corporation, Beaumont, Texas;
1977-1Y78, Civil/Structural Design EnginE!er.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 1973-1977,
Battalion Construction Officer.
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
E /7
e
.
-
e
.... ----.~-
,.. .
Edward A. Cain, P.E.
Electrical Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Physics, 1966,
Texas A&I University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, Ohio
Professional
Affiliations
Illuminating Engineering Society
National Society of Professional Engineers
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas~
1977-present, Manager - Electrical Design.
Provided supervision for all electrical engineering
for a 50-million-gallon-per-day expansion to the
City of Houston East Plant~ the 34.75-mgd expansion
to the Bell County Water Control and Improvement
District No.1 Water Treatment Plant~ the Houston
Northeast Water Purification Plant which includes
a 60,000 KVA substation at 138 KV, and the Houston
Southeast Water Purification Plant which includes
cost-effective evaluation of electrical systems
and equipment.
Directed the design of a 34.5 KV site power distri-
bution system for NL'Petroleum Services~ the
electrical design for complete water supply system
and wastewater system for the City of Jubail,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia~ water pumping station for
the City of Dallas. '
Served as manager for design of medium- and low-
voltage power systems for water and wastewater
plants for numerous clients.
3D/International, Houston, Texas~ 1976-1977,
Senior Associate.
Jochen & Henderson Inc., Houston, Texas~ 1968-1976,
Project Manager.
Houston Lighting & Power Company, Houston, Texas~
1966-1967, Illuminating Engineer.
"
TurnerCollie(6Braden Inc.
E. .20
.
-
<
.
"- ----
~ .-:.
William L. Pearson, P.E.
Mechanical Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical
Engineering, 1952, Texas A&M University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas:
1974-present, Senior Engineer.
Engineering design and management responsibili-
ties for a broad range of projects including
design of booster pump stations, wastewater
and water treatment plants, and municipal water
and wastewater systems.
Responsible for engineering design of a refinery
wastewater treatment plant involving oily water
separation and dissolved air flotation treatment,
an industrial waste treatment plant, industrial
stormwater pumping stations, sludge pumping and
pipeline facilities, industrial surface water
facilities, and condensate recovery and treatment
equipment.
Representative projects are as follows:
AMOCO Texas Refining Company project entailed
responsibility for design of a gravity thickener,
sludge pumping facilities, and 1,800 feet of
sludge pipeline to return supernatant.
EXXON Company U.S.A. Bay town Refinery project
entailed handling of degrading and sludge removal
for a 30-million-gallon-per-day wastewater stream
and gravity oil separator.
Argo International Corp., Houston, Texas; 1966-
1974, Regional Office Manager.
General Electric Company, Chicago, Illinois:
1952-1966, Application, Requisition, and Service
Engineer.
TurnerCollie<f:5Braden Inc.
E. :1-(
.
.
-
.
....--..-
~ -.:
John Wells, P.E.
Senior Mechanical Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering,
1965, Lehigh University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, New York
Professional
Affiliations
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Society of American Value Engineers
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1978-present, Senior Mechanical Engineer.
Responsible for both process and mechanical designs
in the municipal and industrial areas.
Experienced in municipal and industrial water and
wastewater treatment. Water and wastewater experi-
ence includes preliminary design of wastewater and
combined sewer overflow treatment facilities,
comprehensive water supply planning, water rate
studies, municipal wastewater pilot plant programs,
and municipal water treatment studies.
Noteworthy projects include the following:
Final plans and specifications for mechanical/
civil portions of an 80-mgd raw water pump station
for the City of Houston, Texas.
Final plans and specifications for mechanipal/
civil portions of l4-mgd expansions to Bellaire
Brays distribution pump station.
Final plans and specifications for mechanical
portion of 28-mgd expansion to Katy Addicks distri-
bution pump station.
Preliminary design of 5-mgd sewage treatment plant
for the Town of Colonie, New York.
TurnerColliel6Braden Inc.
EJ.c2.
.
,
-
.
......--...-
.... -.:
Bradley H. Winkler, P.E.
Engineer
Education
Master of Environmental Engineering, 1978,
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1978,
Rice University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1982
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1977-present, Engineer.
Experienced in mechanical, process, and chemical
system design for wastewater and water treatment
plants. Prepared planning studies and engineering
reports for municipal and private clients. Devel-
oped bench-scale process testing programs for
water and wastewater treatment. Wrote operation
and maintenance manuals, and participated in on-
site start-up activities for wastewater treatment
plants.
Noteworthy projects include the following.
Bell County WCID No. 1 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Originated and supervised bench-scale tests for
confirmation of design parameters. Wrote opera-
tion and maintenance manual for this advanced
l5-mgd wastewater treatment plant. Provided on-
site start-up assistance and operator training.
Harris County Utility District No.5, Kingwood
Central Sewage Treatment Plant. Performed mechani-
cal, process, instrumentation, and civil design
for a 1.75-mgd expansion of this advanced waste-
water treatment plant.
Trinity Bay Conservation District. Facility
planning for installation of sewage collection
system serving a sparsely populated rural area.
City of Brenham Wastewater Treatment Plant
Evaluation. Plant-wide evaluation emphasizing
recommendations to upgrade process performance.
City of Houston, First Quadrennial Report on the
Physical Condition and Adequacy of Houston's
Sanitary Sewer System. Inspected 18 of the City's
sewage treatment plants.
TurnerCollie(6Braden (nc.
e. :2 3
.
.
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
MADE AND ENTERED INTO by and between the City of La Porte, Texas,
hereinafter called the "City," and Turner Collie & Braden Inc.,
hereinafter called the "Engineer."
RECITALS
The City intends to plan, design, and construct a relief sanitary
sewer from the western area of the City along Fairmont Parkway to the'
existing City of La Porte Wastewater Treatment Facility. The City
also intends to plan, design, and construct improvements to the
existing City wastewater treatment facility and to the existing
College View MUD wastewater treatment facility and lift station.
Such improvements to the above described sanitary sewer system and
wastewater treatment facilities are hereinafter referred to as the
"project."
CONTRACTUAL UNDERTAKINGS
SECTION I
EMPLOYMENT OF ENGINEER
The City agrees to employ the Engineer and the Engineer agrees
to perform professional engineering services in connection with the
Project as stated in the Sections to follow and as is described
in further detail on the attached Exhibit A entitled "Scope of
Services," and for having rendered such services, the City agrees
to pay to the Engineer compensation as stated in the Sections ,to
follow. The Engineer intends to make available the services of
the personnel shown on the attached Exhibit B entitled "Organiza-
tion Chart" through the duration of the project.
-1-
E~i
"
e
e
SECTION II
CHARACTER AND EXTENT OF SERVICES
The Engineer shall render the following professional services
necessary for the development of the Project:
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase - Basic Services
1. Prepare engineering report setting forth recommenda-
tions for the following items. Furnish City with
15 copies of report.
a. Develop plan for ultimate abandonment of existing
College View MUD wastewater treatment facility.
b. Develop plan for interim solids handling (sludge)
at existing College View MUD wastewater treatment
facility.
2. Prepare compliance schedule for College View MUD
wastewater treatment facility.
3. Prepare applications for amendments to existing TDWR
and NPDES (EPA) permits in conjunction with the pro-
posed expansion of the City's wastewater treatment
facility.
B. Preliminary Design Phase - Basic Services
1. Attend preliminary conference with the City regarding
the Project.
2. Perform preliminary engineering services in connection
with Project in sufficient detail to indicate clearly
the problems involved and the alternate solutions
available to the City, to include preliminary layouts,
sketches, and estimates of probable cost for the
Project, and to set forth clearly the Engineer's
recommendations. Prepare preliminary engineering
reports specifically for the following items.
a. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer. ~~velop
trunk sewer sizes, alignment, and connections to
existing system(s) from the existing College View
-2-
/'
t. ::2-5>
I'
.
e
Municipal Utility District (MUD) wastewater treat-
ment facility lift station to the City's waste-
water treatment facility. The relief sanitary
sewer in conjunction with the existing Fairmont
Parkway trunk sewer is to convey year 2003 flows
to the City's main wastewater treatment facility.
b. Expansion of the City's main wastewater treatment
facility from an average capacity of 2.5 million
gallons per day (mgd) and a maximum wet weather
capacity of 6.25 mgd to an average capacity of
4.0 mgd and a maximum wet weather capacity of
16.0 mgd.
c. Expansion of College View MUD Lift station to
convey flows from the abandoned College View MUD
wastewater treatment facility and its service
area to the proposed relief sanitary sewer on
Fairmont Parkway.
3. Furnish the City 15 copies of the preliminary design
report(s), including preliminary layouts, sketches,
and cost estimates.
C. Final Design ,Phase - Basic Services
1. Establish the scope and advise the City of any soil
and foundation investigations or any design surveys
or special testing which, in the opinion of the Engi-
neer, may be required for the proper execution of the
Project; and arrange with the City for the conduct of
such investigations, surveys, and tests. (The perform-
mance of these investigations and tests is not a part
of the Engineer's basic services, and compensation
therefor is not included in the Basic Charge; it may
be performed by the Engineer, by agreement with the
City, in which case compensation shall be determined
by the applicable portions of Section VI.)
-3-
E ~b
1'1
.
.
2. Furnish to the City, where required by the circum-
stances of the assignment, the engineering data
necessary for applications for routine permits by
local and state authorities (as distinguished from
detailed applications and supporting documents for
government grants-in-aid, or to meet the requirements
of special programs of the federal government other
than those specified in Section II, Paragraph A.3.
above) .
3. Upon written authorization of the City, prepare
detailed specifications and contract drawings of
facilities listed in Section II, Paragraph B.2.
These designs shall be submitted to the applicable
state and federal agencies for approval.
4. Prepare detailed estimates of probable costs and
proposals of authorized construction, which shall
include summaries of bid items and quantities which
will be based, wherever practical, on the unit price
system of bidding. The Engineer shall not be
required to guarantee the accuracy of these estimates.
5. Furnish to the City 50 copies of approved plans,
specifications, notices to bidders, and proposals for
each construction contract. All copies in excess of
50 shall be paid for separately as ~pecified in
Section,VI.
D. Construction Phase - Basic Services
1. Assist the City in the advertisement of the Project
for bids.
2. Assist the City in the opening' and tabulation of
bids for construction of the Project, and recommend
to the City as to the proper action on all proposals
received.
-4-
E. c21
.
.
.
3. Assist in the preparation of formal Contract Docu-
ments for the contracts.
4. Provide the services of a Registered Professional
Engineer experienced in each aspect of plant design
and construction to make visits to the site at least
once every two weeks during construction and at all
critical points of construction (as distinguished
from the continuous services of a resident Project
Representative described in paragraph E.II. below).
The Engineer is to observe the progress and quality
of the executed work and to determine in general if
the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract
Documents. In performing this service, the Engineer
will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous
on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity
of the work or material; he will not be responsible
for the techniques and sequences of construction or
the safety precautions incident thereto, and he will
not be responsible or liable in any degree for the
contractors' failure to perform the construction
work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
During visits to the construction site, and on the
basis of the Engineer's on-site observations, he
will keep the City informed in writing of the extent
of the progress of the work, and advise the City of
material and substantial defects and deficiencies in
the work of contractors which are discovered by the
Engineer or otherwise brought to the Engineer's atten-
tion in the course of construction.
S. Consult and advise with the City; issue all instruc-
tions to the contractor requested by the City; and
prepare routine change orders as required.
-5-
E.. d-!
4
"
I
.
6. Check and review samples, catalog data, schedules,
shop drawings, laboratory, shop and mill tests of
materials and equipment and other data which the con-
tractor is required to submit, only for conformance
with the design concept of the Project and compliance
with the information given by the Contract Documents:
and assemble written guarantees which are required by
the Contract Documents.
7. Prepare monthly and final estimates for payments to
contractors, and furnish to the City any necessary
certifications as to payments to contractors and
suppliers.
8. Conduct, in company with the City, a final inspection
of the Project for conformance with the design concept
of the Project and compliance with the Contract Docu-
ments, and recommend in writing final payment to the
contractors.
9. Revise contract drawings, with the assistance of the
Contractor, to provide record drawings of the completed
Project. The Engineer will use his best efforts and
will exercise the usual degree of care in preparing
these drawings: he shall not be required to guarantee
the accuracy of the record drawings. Furnish a set of
reproducibles of these record drawings to the City.
E. Special Services
If authorized in writing by City, Engineer shall furnish
or obtain from others Special Services of the following types
which are not considered normal or customary Basic Services
except to the extent provided otherwise in scope of work: these
will be paid for by City as indicated in Section VI.
1. By subcontract or otherwise, perform field surveys,
title searches, plats, metes and bounds descriptions,
-6-
E d.7
~
".
.
and office computations and drafting related to the
tasks.
2. Travel expenses when authorized by the City to points
other than the Engineer's office, City offices, or the
Project Area.
3. By subcontract or otherwise, perform soil consulta-
tions and/or test borings, and acquire other similar
information, investigations, and analyses.
4. Prepare special reports or studies required by
the City not covered under Basic Services.
5. Preparation of environmental statements and assistance
to City in preparing for and attending public
hearings. Appearances before regulatory agencies.
6. Assist the City as an expert witness or otherwise in
connection with any litigation with third parties or
administrative proceedings arising in relation to the
Project, provided such litigation was not caused by
the failure of the Engineer to perform in the first
instance.
7. After the final plans and specifications have been
approved by the City, evaluate items submitted by the
City to the Engineer for evaluation pursuant to the
Substitution Clause of a construction contract,
evaluate proposals for change orders, prepare change
orders, or revise plans and specifications, provided
that these services (a) are not made necessary by a
failure of the Engineer to perform in the first'
instance and (b) take more than eight (8) hours of
services by the Engineer's employees to complete per
item.
8. Perform services related to a readvertisement for bids
(not caused by fhe Engineer's failure to perform in
the first instance).
-7-
E~
"
e
e
"
9. Services resulting from significant changes in extent
of the Project or its design including, but not
limited to, ~hanges in size, complexity, City's
schedule, or character of construction or method of
financing: and revising previously accepted studies,
reports, design documents, or Contract Documemts when
such revisions are due to causes beyond Engineer's
control.
10. Additional or extended services during construction
made necessary by (a) work damaged by fire or other
cause during construction, (b) a significant amount
of defective or neglected work of Contractor(s),
(c) prolongation of the contract time of any prime
contract by more than 120 days, or (d) default by
Contractor(s), all through no fault of Engineer.
11. Provide one or more experienced and qualified Resident
Project Representatives, as approved by the City
Manager, one of whom shall be designated by the
Engineer as the Chief Representative. The Resident
Project Representative shall provide continuous,
on-the-site observation of the construction work,
including the material furnished and the workmanship
provided. The Chief Representative shall make a
daily written report to the City with respect to the
material furnished, the workmanship provided, and
the progress of the work, all in relationship to the
construction contract documents, provided, however,
the Resident Project Representatives need not be
registered professional engineers, and provided
further, that unless the circumstances otherwise
warrant, the Resident Project Representatives shall
not be required to make exhaustive on-the-site
inspections to check the quality or quantity of the
-8-
E3(
e
e
I:,
maps, field notes, statistics, computations, and other data in
his possession relative to existing facilities and to the Project.
SECTION VI
THE ENGINEER'S COMPENSATION
The City shall compensate the Engineer for Basic Services
performed under this Agreement on a "Lump Sum" basis of compensation.
Such compensation shall be as outlined below for each phase of the
Project. Special Services provided by the Engineer shall be compen-
sated as hereinafter provided for in this Section.
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $12,000 (Twelve Thousand Dollars)
shall be full compensation for the Basic Services Fee for
this phase of the Project. Partial payments for services in
the Special Studies and Reports Phase shall be made monthly.
Payments will be made in proportion to that part of the ser-
vices which has been completed, as evidenced by monthly
statements submitted by the Engineer to the City. Final
payment for services in the Special Studies and Report Phase
shall be due upon completion of these services.
B. Preliminary Design Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $58,000 (Fifty-Eight Thousand
Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic Services
Fee for this phase of the Project. Partial payments for
services in the Preliminary Design Phase shall be made
monthly. Payments will be made in proportion to that part
of the services in the Preliminary Design Phase which has
been accomplished, as evidenced by monthly statements
submitted by the Engineer to the City. Final payment for
services in the Preliminary Design Phase shall be payable
upon submission to the City of the required report(s),
sketches, and estimates, and upon the City's acceptance
of these submittals, which shall be within 30 days after
submission.
-10-
E. 3;2-
e
e
II.
work or material and shall not be required to check
the techniques and sequences of construction or the
safety precautions incident thereto.
SECTION III
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
No professional services of any nature shall be undertaken by
the Engineer under this Agreement until he has received written
authorization from the City. Each Phase of Basic Services and each
item of Special Services shall be authorized by separate letters of
authorization signed by the City Manager.
SECTION IV
PERIOD OF SERVICE
The Engineer agrees to perform services diligently and to com-
plete services under Section II A. within forty-five (45) calendar
days after execution of Agreement and under Sections II B. and
II C. (1) Fairmont Parkway Relief Sewer within one hundred eighty
(180) calendar days after execution of Agreement and (2) existing
City wastewater treatment facility expansion within two hundred
forty (240) calendar days after execution of Agreement. This
Agreement shall be effective upon execution by the City and the
Engineer and shall remain in force until final payment for services
called for under Section 11.0.9. has been made or until terminated
under the provisions hereinafter provided in Section VIII.
SECTION V
COORDINATION WITH THE OWNER
The Engineer shall hold periodic conferences with the City
Manager and/or his designated representatives to the end that"
the Project, as perfected, shall have full benefit of the City's
experience and knowledge of existing needs..and facilities and be
consistent with its current policies and construction standards.
To implement this coordination, the City shall make available to
the Engineer, for use in planning the Project, all existing plans,
-9-
E~
e
e
C. Final Design Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $252,000 (Two Hundred Fifty-Two
Thousand Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic
Services Fee for this phase of the Project. Partial payments
for services in the Final Design Phase shall be made monthly.
Payments will be made in proportion to that part of the ser-
vices in the Final Design Phase which has been accomplished,
as evidenced by monthly statements submitted by the Engineer
to the City. Final payment for services authorized in the
Final Design Phase shall be due upon the completion of these
services.
D. Construction Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $78,000 (Seventy-Eight Thousand
Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic Services
Fee for this phase of the Project. This sum will be paid in
monthly installments in proportion to the construction work
completed, on the basis of the Engineer's estimates prepared
for monthly payments to contractors. Upon completion of all
work authorized in the Construction Phase, the Engineer will
be paid the remainder of the charge for this Phase.
E. Special Services Not Included in Above Lump Sum Charges
The charges above described in the Special Studies and
Reports, Preliminary Design, Final Design, and Construction
phases shall provide compensation to the Engineer for all
services called for under this Agreement to be performed by
him, or under his direction, except the services set forth
below. These excluded Special Services, and the compensation
to be paid by the City to the Engineer for their performance,
as required, are as follows:
Service
Basis of Compensation
1. Field surveys to collect
information required for
design.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
-lI-
E.. 3(
e
2. Special investigative
assignments.
3. Preparation of environ-
mental statements and
assistance to City in
preparing for and
attending public
hearings.
4. Services of a resident
Project Representative,
and other field person-
nel as required, for
on-the-site observation
and for construction
layout surveys.
5. Soil and foundation
investigations, includ-
ing test borings, soil
tests, and analyses of
test results.
6. Land surveys and estab-
lishment of boundaries
and monuments.
7. Preparation of property
or easement descriptions.
8. Preparation of any
special reports required
for marketing of bonds.
9. Appearances before
regulatory agencies.
10. Assistance to the City
as an expert witness in
any litigations with
third parties, arising
from the development or
construction of Project.
11. Travel expenses to points
other than Engineer's
office, City offices, or
Project Area (except item
E. 4 above).
-12-
IE. 35
!!
e
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. RE~imburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
Project Representative
travel cost between
Engineer's office"and
Project area at 35 cents
per mile.
Actual subcontract cost
and other direct non-
labor expense at invoice
cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
$375 per diem for each
day, or part thereof, in
which Engineer's presence
is required by City.
Actual invoice cost.
Travel by vehicles owned
or leased by the Engineer
shall be at 35 cents per
mile.
i.
e
e
12. Additional copies of
reports and specifica-
tions and additional
blueprint copies of
drawings over the number
of copies specified under
Basic Services.
Reimbursement for direct
nonlabor expense and sub-
contract expense at invoice
cost.
Payments to the Engineer for authorized Special Services shall
be made monthly, by the City, upon presentation of monthly state-
ments by the Engineer of such services. "Salary Cost" is defined
as the cost of salaries (total hours worked times the employee's
rate of pay on an hourly basis) of the Engineer's employees for
time directly chargeable to the Project, plus 27 percent for social
security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes,
employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, incentive
pay, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and
holiday pay applicable thereto. The "Salary Cost" for the services
of the Engineer's officers shall be at their regular "Salary Cost,"
as defined above, not to exceed $40.00 per hour. In addition, an
overtime premium for draftsmen and technician classifications will
be charged for which the Engineer's technical staff works in excess
of 40 hours. The overtime premium shall be one-half the employee's
Salary Cost times 2.25. The overtime premium will be charged only
because of the City's requirements and upon its specific
authorization.
The maximum amount payable for Basic Services under this
Agreement is $400,000 (Four Hundred Thousand Dollars). This maximum
amount payable may be revised in the event of changes in extent,
complexity, or character of work as authorized in writing by the
City. The maximum amount payable for Special Services shall be
authorized in writing by the City for each individual assignment.
No Special Services shall be provided in excess of the amount
authorized.
Payments to the Engineer for authorized services will be made
monthly by the City upon presentation of monthly statements by the
Engineer of such services. Monthly statements will include detailed
-13-
E 36
e e
backup information requested by City. Payments shall be due upon
receipt by the City of any such statement. All remittances shall be
mailed or delivered to Engineer's office in Houston, Harris County,
Texas.
If City fails to make any payment due Engineer for services
and expenses within sixty days after receipt of Engineer's bill
therefor, the amounts due Engineer shall include a charge at the
rate of ,12 percent per annum from said sixtieth day, and in addi-
tion, Engineer may, after giving seven days written notice to
Owner, suspend services under this Agreement until he has been
paid in full all amounts due him from services and expenses.
SECTION VII
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Original documents, plans, designs, and survey notes developed
in connection with services performed hereunder belong to, and
remain the property of the City, in consideration of which it is
mutually agreed that the City will use them solely in connection
with the Project, save with the express consent of the Engineer.
The Engineer may retain reproducible copies of such documents.
SECTION VIII
TERMINATION
Either party to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement by
giving to the other 30 days' notice in writing. Upon delivery of
such notice by the City to the Engineer, and upon expiration of
the 30-day period, the Engineer shall discontinue all services in
connection with the performance of this Agreement and shall proceed
to cancel promptly all existing orders and contracts insofar 'as
such orders or contracts are chargeable to this Agreement. As
soon as practicable after receipt of notic~ of termination, the
Engineer shall submit a statement, showing in detail the services
performed under this Agreement to the date of termination. The
City shall then pay the Engineer promptly that proportion of the
-14-
E 37
e
e
prescribed charges which the services called for under this Agree-
ment, less such payments on account of the, charges as have been
previously made. Copies of all completed or partially completed
designs, plans, and specifications prepared under this Agreement
shall be delivered to the City when and if this Agreement is termi-
nated, but subject to the restrictions, as to their use, as set
forth in Section VII.
SECTION IX
ADDRESS OF NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS
All notices and communications under this Agreement to be
mailed or delivered to Engineer shall be to the following address:
Turner Collie & Braden Inc.
P.O. Box 13089
Houston, Texas 77219
Attention: Mr. H. P. McAlister, P.E.
All notices and communications under this Agreement to be
mailed or delivered to the City shall be to the following address:
City of La Porte
P.O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas
At tent ion: r-tr.
77551
Jack Owen
SECTION X
SECTION CAPTIONS
Each Section under the contractual undertakings has been
supplied with a caption to serve only as a guide to the contents.
The caption does not control the meaning of any Section or in any
way determine its interpretation or application.
SECTION XI
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS
The City and the Engineer each binds himself and his successors,
executors, administrators, and assigns to the other party of this
Agreement and to the successors, executors'; administrators, and
assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of: this
Agreement. Except as above, neither the City nor the Engineer
shall assign, sublet, or transfer his interest in this Agreement
without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be
-15-
E. 33
" .
e
e
(1
construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any
officer or agent of any public body which may be a party thereto.
SECTION XII
INSPECTIONS AND AUDIT
The City shall have the right to perform, or cause to be
performed, audits of the books and records of the Engineer and
inspections of all places where work is undertaken in connection
with this Agreement, provided that the Engineer shall not be
required to keep such books and records longer than two (2)
years after the termination of this Agreement.
EXECUTED IN two counterparts (each of which is an original) on
behalf of Engineer by its Senior Vice President shown below, and on
behalf of City by its Mayor (thereunto duly authorized) this
day of
, 1984.
TURNER COLLIE & BRADEN INC.
ATTEST:
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
Senior Vice President
L. A. Bouffard
Assistant Secretary
CITY OF LA PORTE
ATTEST:
Virginia Cline
Mayor
Title:
-16-
E 37
e
e
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase
1. Prepare engineering report for interim operation and ulti-
mate abandonment of existing College View MUD wastewater
treatment facility.
a. Determine requirements for abandonment of existing
facility.
b. Determine the need for demolition of existing facility.
c. Evaluate existing equipment and materials and determine
if there are any salvageable or reusable items.
d. Determine the ultimate use of the site and required
site improvements.
e. Evaluate sludge handling options for interim operation.
(1) Additional sludge drying beds.
(2) Dewatering with mobile equipment.
(3) Hauling of liquid sludge.
2. Prepare compliance schedule for College View MUD wastewater
treatment facility.
a. Prepare draft schedule detailing interim and final
measures to be taken by the City to reduce and eliminate
noncomplying discharges.
b. Review the draft schedule with the City and the Texas
Department of Water Resources (TDWR) staff.
c. Prepare final compliance schedule.
3. Prepare permit applications for amendments to existing TDWR
and NPDES discharge permits.
a. Prepare technical information on proposed plant expan-
sion, including unit capacities, influent and effluent
quality, data on surrounding property owners, and
other required information.
A-I
E 40
e
e
:
b. Prepare a technical report to support the applications
for amended permits, including appropriate exhibits and
tables.
c. Prepare application forms for execution by the City.
4. Submit compliance schedule to regulatory agencies.
5. Submit permit applications to regulatory agencies.
B. Preliminary Design Phase
1. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Determine trunk sewer sizes, lengths, slopes, and
depths.
b. Evaluate alternative sewer locations within the
right-of-way.
c. Investigate and resolve conflicts 'with existing
pipelines and underground utilities.
d. Evaluate and make recommendations on alternative
sewer materials.
e. Determine requirements for modifications or abandon-
ment of existing lift stations.
f. Determine details of connections to existing sewers.
g. Evaluate storage capacity of trunk sewers.
h. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
i. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable cost.s.
j. Present preliminary design recommendations.
k. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
2. Main Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Prepare preliminary process design calculations.
b. Determine sizes and capacities of process units.'
c. Prepare preliminary hydraulic profile calculations.
d. Evaluate alternative treatment equipment.
e. Review existing plant facilities and determine
capacities of existing equipment and treatment units.
f. Prepare preliminary equipment selections.
A-2
~ 11
e
e
"
, I
~
g. Prepare preliminary site layout for proposed
improvements.
h. Prepare preliminary layouts for proposed equipment and
treatment units.
(1) Modifications to existing lift station.
(2) New lift station.
(3) Modifications to existing headworks.
(4) New headworks.
(5) Aeration basins.
(6) Final clarifiers.
(7) Aerobic digester.
(8) Return sludge pumping station.
(9) Chlorine contact basins.
(10). Chlorination facility.
(11) Blowers.
(12) Plant piping.
(13) Electrical improvements.
(14) Instrumentation and control system.
i. Evaluate requirements for future expansion.
j. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
k. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
1. Present preliminary design recommendations.
m. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
3. College View MUD Lift Station
a. Evaluate lift station modifications required to serve
initial design area.
b. Evaluate lift station modifications required to serve
ultimate design area.
c. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
d. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
e. Present preliminary design recommendations.
f. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
A-3
E'4~
I,
e
e
~
C. Final Design Phase
1. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
2. Main Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
3. College View MUD Lift Station
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
A-4
Eo 43
e
e
I,
I
"
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
D. Construction Phase
1. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
2. Main Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
A-5
E '/1
I,
t
(
e
e
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
3. College View MUD Lift Station
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
A-6
~4~
,
~
EXHIBIT B - ORGANIZATION CHART
CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS
WASTEWATERSYSTEMIMPRO
VEMENTS
-
e
. ...
-
;
I
;
~
"
PROJECT DIRECTOR
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
TECHNICAL ADVISOR
AND
ALTERNATE PROJECT DIRECTOR ---------------
Neil E. Bishop, P.E., Ph.D.
PROJECT MANAGER
.
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
I I
PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER
MAIN WASTEWATER TREATMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASE FAIRMONT PARKWAY RELIEF
PLANT EXPANSION SERVICES SANITARY SEWER
Peter J. Goldsmith, P.E. George O. Puig, P.E. James W. Johnson, P.E.
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
'""
~
,-
e
e
TO:
CITY MANAGER
FROM: Public Works Di~ect,or
, D~TE: : : ,May 1, 1984'
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL" AGENDA ITEM
2.
xx
Report
1. Agenda Date Requested:
May 9, 1984
Resolution
Ordinance
3. Project Summary:
4.
Purchase Work Management System
provide management information.
are(ready at this time.
;&
Action Requir~d:
Authorize the expenditure of $25,767 for the purchase of software and
hardware.
software and two (2) microcomputers to
Hardware has been bid, but _ recommendations
5. , A:1:t'erna t-i ve :
Do not purchase system.
6.' RecoJllDlendati'on
Autho!ize purchase.
7.' Exhibits:
Attached.
8.
Availability of Funds:
General Fund
y
Water/Wastewater
Capital Improvmt.
General Revenue Sharing
other
Account Number: 003-806-806-801
Funds Available: X
Yes
No
9.
Jerry L. Hodge, Director of Public Works
Requested By
A'"- ' /-- o~ ' ,
......J -: -.(5.:.... '"
Date /
RECEIVED
~S--I - ~'"
.
.
.
.
CITY OF LA PORTE
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
System
Manager
DATE: April 30, 1984
FROM:
Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:
The Public Works Department is currently reviewing a proposal for a Work
Management System from LWFW Inc. Group.
The Work Management System utilizes microcomputers and provides management
information in two related areas:
1. Backlog of pending jobs, including recurring work, planned
work, and on-demand calls for service, and;
2. Work performed, including a description of the task, where it
was performed, resources utilized, special characteristics,
and quantity of work.
This information will help to evaluate productivity, develop the most
effective work plans and schedules, and allocate resources. The proposal
is to provide professional services which include installing the Work
Management System in computer programs on a desk top computer and assisting
management in performing related implementation tasks.
The total cost of software (on two computers), consulting, and expenses come
to $14,700. Adding the cost of hardware will bring the total to $25,767.
Members of LWFW will gladly discuss the system and its benefits before City
Council at a predetermined time.
If you should have any questions, please advise.
JLH/lw
e
.
Turner Collie (6Braden Inc.
H. CECIL ALLEN
VICE PRESIDENT
PO BOX 13089
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77219
5757 WOODWAY
713 780-4100
TELEX 774185 TCR HOU
April 30, 1984
Mr. Jack OWen
City Manager
City of La Porte
P. O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77551
Re: La Porte Sanitary Sewer System Improvements
Turner Collie & Braden Job No. 13-02000-010
Dear Jack,
We are happy to present two (2) draft copies of an Agreement
for Engineering Services for your review for the above ref-
erenced project.
We estimate that the probable Total Construction Costs for the
project will be $7,721,000 (see Attachment "A"). We propose
to provide engineering for the Basic Services outlined in this
Agreement for $400,000 (see Attachment "A") and we estimate
that the Special Services will be approximately $315,000 (see
Attachment "A"), should the City authorize full time construc-
tion Project Representatives for both construction contracts.
If the City elects to furnish one or more of the Project
Representatives or elects to have only part time services
provided on one or more of the construction contracts, the
cost would be less. The responsibilities of the construction
Project Representatives will include on-site observation of
construction, review of materials and workmanship, preparation
of daily written reports, and daily communication and co-
ordination with the contractors. Basically, the Project
Representative's function is to see that the construction work
is completed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
Attachment "B" represents a breakdown of probable construction
costs into those attributable to abandonment of the College
View MUD wastewater treatment facility and conveyance of its
flow to the existing City main wastewater treatment facility
and those that can be attributed directly to the growth of
the City of La Porte.
Attachment "C" presents the general tasks required to complete
this project and includes both Basic Services and Special
Service items.
CONSULTINC ENCINEERS . TEXAS AUSTINIDALLASIEL PASOIHOUSTON/PORT ARTHUR COLORADO DENVER/GRAND JUNCTION
--
e
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
April 30, 1984
Mr. Jack Owen
City of La Porte
Page Two
Attaclunent "0" is an analysis of basic serVl.ces engineering
fees for a project of this size based on the fee curves shown
in th~ TSPE manual. Our proposed fee for basic services is
$85,000 below the fee calculated from the curves. This amount
represents the value of the recently completed Comprehensive
Wastewater Collection and Treatment Plan as it applies to this
project, plus the value of other work we performed for the City.
Attaclunent "E" presents the resumes of the key personnel involved
in this project. The resumes of the Principal in Charge, Project
Director, alternate Project Director, Project Manager and Project
Engineers are included, along with the resumes of several of the
primary des~gn engineers available to work on this assignment.
We propose to complete the Preliminary Design and Final Design
phases within 180 days after authorization (,150 days to complete
work and 30 days for approval of plans and specifications) for
the Fairmont Parkway Relief Sewer and within 240 days after
authorization (210 days to complete work and 30 days for approval
of plans and specifications) for the Expansion of ,the Main
Wastewater Treatment Facility. All work outlined in Paragraphs
II.A. and II.B. of the Agreement will be finished within 45
days after authorization.
Should you or your staff wish to discuss any of the information
presented here in more detail, we would be happy to do so. We
appreciate the opportunity to submit this Agreement for Engineer-
ing Services for your consideration. '
Very truly yours,
E::;J ~Ld{ ~
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
Project Director
HCA:RCR:lf
Attaclunents
cc: Jerry Hodge w/attaclunents
John Joerns w/attaclunents
e
e
Attachment "A"
la Porte Sanitary Sewer System' In'q?rovenertts
A. Canstructicn COsts
1. Relief Sanitary Sewer
2. Main Sewage Treatment Plant EXpansion
3. Modificaticns to College View Lift Station
Total Construction Cost*
B. Engineering 'Costs
1. Basic SeJ:vices
a. Special Studies and Reports Phase
b. Preliminary Design Phase
c. Final Design Phase
d. Construction Phase
Subtotal Basic SeJ:vices
2. Special SeJ:vices
a. Surveys
b. Geoteclmical WOrk
c. Miscellaneous Engineering AssigIl[IBlts
d. Project Representatives
Subtotal Special Services
Total Engineering Costs
Total Costs**
$4,311,000
3,365,000
45,000
$7,721,000
$ 12 ,000
58,000
252,000
78,000
$ 400,000
$ 30,000
35,000
10,000
240,000
$ 315,000
$ 715,000
$8,436,000
_ *Inc1udes 15% Construction Contingencies
**Does not include land costs, lEigal fees or cost of bond sales associated
with Project .
e
e 2/27/84
City of La Porte
Faimont Parkway Trunk Sewer
, '
ESTIMATED PROBABLE CCNsrRUcrICN casTS
60" MRCP 5,200 1. f. $ 200 $i,040,000
54" MRCP 8,000 180 1,440,000
48" MRCP 3,500 160 560,000
24" RCP 3,600 60 216,000
21" RCP 2,600 50 130,000
12"FM 6,500 25 162,500
Siphons 4 50,000 200,000
Subtotal $3,748,500
COntingencies (15%) ~2,500
TOI'AL $4,311,000
e
e 2/27/84
City of Ia Porte
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
ESI'IMATEDPROBABLE cx:NSTRJcrICN COSTS
Lift Station - upgrade existing
- add, new station
Headworks - roodify existing
- add new
l\eration Basins
Final Clarifiers
Aerobic Digester
Retum Sludge Pl.n'rping Station
Chlorine ecntact Bclsins
Chlorination Facilities
Blowers
Plant Piping
Electrical
Total Plant
$ 100,000
500,000
50,000
300,000
400,000
400,000
120,000
200,000
150,000
60,000
60,000
350,000
'130~000
$2',820,000
Plant Relief Sewer
SUbtotal
TOI'AL
106,000
$2,926,000
, 439,000
$3,365,000
Contingencies (15%)
e
Attaclment "B"
e
'Breakdown of Probable Constructicn Costs
A. College VieM'MUD Share
21" VCP
12" F .M.
Siphons
Lift Staticms
Subtotal
Contingencies @ 15%
Total Tnmk Sewer
Main Sl'P Expansicm (including 15% Contingency)
Total - College VieM MUD Share '
22,900 Lf.
6,500 Lf.
4
2
B. City of La. Porte Share
Total Probable eonstructicn Cost
Total - College VieM MUD Share
Total - City of La. Porte Share
C. Surm1a:ty
College VieM MUD Share = $3,005,000 = 38.9%
City of La. Porte Share = $4,716,000 = 61.1%
$
50
25
50,000
140,000
$1,145,000
162,500
200,000
, 280~000
$1,787,500
2'68,500
$2,056,000
, 949~000
$3,005,000
$7,721,000
, 3 , 005 ~'OOO
$4,716,000
e
e
Attachrn:mt "e"
'BreakdoWn 'of 'Engineering 'Tasks
1. Special studies' and RepOrts Phase
a. Study of ultimate abandonment of College View wastewater plant
b. Study of solids handling at COllege VifM wastewater plant
c. Preparaticn of carpliance scbeduie for College VifM MUD waste-
water treabrent plant
d. Preparaticn of applications for amendments to existing TDWR and
NPDES (EPA) pe:on:its of main wastewater 'treatment facility in
conjunction with proposed expansicn
e. Preparaticn of ~ineer~g Reports.
2. pre1ilnina:r:y Design Phase
a. prelimi.na.J:y design of main wastewater'treabrent facility
b. prelimi.na.J:y design of relief tnmk sewer
c. Preliminary des'ign of College VifM MUD ultimate lift station
d. Preparation of 'Prelimina.rY Design Reports
3. Final Design Phase
a. Preparation of construction contract for main wastewater treat.nP.nt
facility expansion
b. Preparation of construction contract for relief trunk sewer and
ultimate College View Lift station
c. Design Sw::veys (Special Sel:vices)
d. Geoteclmical work (Special Sel:vices)
e. Subnission of design to regulatory agencies for approval
f. Fumish Plans and Specificaticns for bidding purposes.
4. construction Phase
a. Assist with Mvertisement for bids
b. Reocmnend award of contract
c. Assist with preparation of fonnal cxntract docunents
d. Perfonn Basic Sel:vices construction phase tasks
e. Provide Resident Project Representatives as authorized (Special Se:r::vices)
f. Conduct final inspecticn
g. Reu..l.llll:::ud final acceptance of constructed projects (s) .
e
e
]\.ttac1lmant "0"
Analysis of Basic Services Engineering Fees
Based on Fee CUrves
1. Sanita:ry Sewer Constructicn Cost
Percent of CQ'lstrocticn Cost fran Curve B
Fee = $4,311,000 ,x 0.053
2. Main Sl'P CCnstructicn Cost
Percent of CCnstructian Cost fran CUrve A
.Mditicnal ~saticn for Modifications
, New CCnstructicn = $2,165,000
MOdifications = $1,200,000
Fee - New CCnstructian = $2,165,000 x 0.065
- MOdifications = $1,200,000 x 0.065 x 1.33
- Total
= $4,311,000
= 5.3%
= $228,500
= $3,365,000
= 6.5%
= 33%
3. Special Studies and Reports Phase Fee
= $140,700
= 103,800
$244,500
= $ 12,000
4. SUmnary - Basic Services Fees
Sanitazy Sewer
Main Sl'P
Special Studies and Reports Phase
Total
$228,500
244,500
12 , 000
$485,000
e
e
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA PORTE
TO:
Mayor Cline and Counci1persons
FROM:
Jack Owen
SUBJECT: La Porte Sanitary Sewer Improvements Contract with
Turner Collie & Braden, Inc.
DATE:
May 3, ,1984
Attached is a proposed contract with support data submitted
by T~rner Collie & Braden, Inc. for certain san~tary sewer
improvements. The Staff has conferred with TC & B concerr.ing
this draft but has not had time to review it'in the present
form. A meeting has been scheduled for May 8th for a complete
review of the proposed contract.
One of the conditions imposed by the Texas Water Conunission
for the sale of the College View Bonds is that an engineering
contract be executed no later than June 24, 1984.
We are, therefore, placing this item on the May 9th Workshop
enda.
JO/11h
attachment
e
RESUMES
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
Neil E. Bishop, Ph~D., P.E.
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Peter J. Goldsmith, P.E.
James W. Johnson, F.E.
George o. Puig, P.E.
Edward A. Cain, P.E.
William L. Pearson, P.E.
John F. Wells, P.E.
Bradley H. Winkler, P.E.
e
Attachment "E"
e
e
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
Senior Vice President
and Chief Engineer
Principal in Charge
Education
Registration
Professional
Affiliations
Experience
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,
1952, Bachelor of Arts, 1951, Rice University
Professional Engineer: Texas, Colorado,
Louisiana, New Mexico
American Consulting Engineers Council
American Society of Civil Engineers
Houston Engineering and Scientific Society
National Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas:
1966-present, Senior Vice President and Chief
Engineer. ~
Serves as director and treasurer of the corpora-
tion and is experienced in design and related
management and supervision for the firm's muni-
cipal engineering.
Responsible for the operation and management of
the firm's public works, water supply engineer-
ing, planning and engineering studies, plant
services, industrial activities, computerized
systems engineering, acoustical engineering,
and land-use planning.
Directed the engineering, planning, and designs
of water and wastewater projects including the
following.
City of Houston Southeast Water Purification
Plant.
City of Houston Municipal Water System.
Bell County WCID No. 1 Surface Water Treatment
Plant.
Bell County WCID No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Collection
and Treatment System.
Texas A&M Wastewater Collection and Treatment
System.
TurnerCollie0Braden Inc.
e
e
Cecil Allen, P.E.
Project Director
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1963,
Texas A&M University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1967
Public Surveyor: Texas, 1980
Professional
Affiliations
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Resources Association
Association of Consulting Municipal Engineers
Consulting Engineers Council
Houston Engineering and Scientific Society
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1963-present, Project Director.
Responsible for a project unit that provides plant
engineering services such as preparation of plans
and specifications for water treatment plants,
sewage treatment plants, water supply and distribu-
tion pumping facilities, wastewater lift stations,
and related facilities.
Extensively experienced in serving municipal
clients through design, analysis, and planning of
water and wastewater systems. Design expertise
focuses on water distribution systems, water
supply systems, sanitary sewage collection sys-
tems, and sanitary sewage treatment facilities.
Noteworthy projects reflecting experience include
the following.
Design of wastewater treatment plant enlargements
for Clear Lake City, Bay town, Bay City, and Eagle
Pass. These enlargements were for existing
plants and ranged in size from 1.5 mgd to 4.5
mgd.
Design of first enlargement of City of Houston
West District Sewage Treatment Plant from 2.0 mgd
to 6.0 mgd.
Design of Phase I of the City of Houston South-
east Water Purification Plant. This phase is
to be a 160-mgd increment of an ultimate 720-mgd
facility.
TurnerCollielO'Braden Inc.
e
e
Cecil Allen,
Page Two
P.E.
Experience
Design of 3.0-mgd wastewater plant to serve King-
wood Development. Plant was designed to provide
tertiary treatment and to be expanded to 9.0 mgd.
Design of waterlines, wastewater lines, storm
sewers, paving, and elevated tanks for portion
of Kingwood Development (18,000 acre).
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
e e
Neil E. Bishop, Ph.D., P.E.
Project Director
Education
Registration
Professional
Affiliations
Experience
Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering, 1975,
Master of Science in Environmental Health
Engineering, 1968,
The University of Texas at Austin,
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1966,
Arlington State College
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1976
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Works Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Air Pollution Control Association
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas~
1970-present, Project Director.
Directs the firm's practice in engineering investi-
gations and planning studies in environmental engi-
neering and science, solid waste, water resources,
air pollution, and wastewater. Actively partici-
pates in public hearinns, and is responsible for
all projects entailing hydrologic investigations.
Extensively experienced in conducting planning and
engineering studies related to wastewater convey-
ance and treatment. Direct expertise focuses on
laboratory treatability studies, operational
troubleshooting, wastewater characterization stud-
ies, and permitting activities.
Completed area-wide (201) Facility Plans for sev-
eral governmental entities including the City of
Houston, the City of Orange, Clear Lake City Water
Authority, Bell County WCID No.1, and the City of
Galveston. Studies included Sewer System Analysis,
Sewer System Evaluation Studies, and Environmental
Information Documents.
TurnerCollie<.U'Braden Inc.
e
e
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Project Manager
Education
Registration
Professional
Affiliations
Experience
Master of Engineering in Environmental
Engineering, 1977.
Bachelor of Science in Environmental
Engineering, 1975.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1981~
Florida, 1980
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas~
1980-present, Manager.
Responsibilities include project management,
supervision and coordination of engineering
design groups, water and wastewater treatment
facility design, preparation of plans and speci-
fications, report writing, preparation of permit
applications, project planning and scheduling,
construction management.
The following is a list of representative
projects.
City of La Porte Main Sewage Treatment Plant
Improvements. Analysis of plant operational
problems, evaluation of plant equipment and
design, recommendation of improvements includ-
ing new sludge pumping system, modification of
lift station controls, and control building
ventilation.
City of Alice Northeast Sewage Treatment Plant.
New 2.02-mgd oxidation ditch treatment plant and
a new 1.8-mgd lift station.
City of Alice Southside Sewage Treatment Plant.
Expansion of an existing facility from 2.0 mgd
to 2.7 mgd.
TurnerCollie<f1Braden Inc.
e
e
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Page Two
Experience
Kingwood Place Wastewater Treatment Plant,
Kingwood, Texas. New facility with initial
capacity of 0.75 mgd, ultimate capacity of
3.0 mgd.
Beltway Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase III
Expansion, Houston, Texas. Expansion of the plant
from 4.4-mgd capacity to l3.34-mgd capacity.
Responsible for preparation of final plans, speci-
fications, and contract documents.
Port Acres Wastewater Treatment Plant, Port
Arthur, Texas. Expansion of the plant from
0.4-mgd capacity to 1.9-mgd capacity.
Main Outfall Lift Station, Port Arthur, Texas.
Design of a major sewage lift station with
38.5-mgd capacity.
Gee & Jenson, Inc., West Palm Beach, Florida;
1976-1980, Project Engineer.
Representative projects include the following.
Acme Improvement District Wastewater Treatment
Plant, Wellington, Florida. Design of a 1.5-mgd-
capacity oxidation ditch-type treatment facility.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation,
Deerfield Beach, Florida. Design of modifica-
tions and upgrading of a 4.0-mgd-capacity
contact-stabilization plant.
Wastewater Collection System Expansion, Deerfield
Beach, Florida. Design of 10 pump stations and
approximately 40 miles of gravity and pressure
pipelines to serve developed areas of the city.
TurnerCollie<f1Braden Inc.
e
e
Peter Goldsmith, P.E.
Project Engineer
Education
Master of Science in Water Resources Technology,
1977, The University of Birmingham, England
Diploma (First Class) Constructional Engineering,
1970, Twickenham College of Technology, England
Registration
Chartered Civil Engineer: United Kingdom
Professional Engineer: Texas
Licensed Irrigator: Texas
Professional
Affiliation
Institution of Civil Engineers, United Kingdom
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas1
1979-present, Project Engineer.
Project Manager for infrastructure design for
Aramco communities at Abqaiq and Udhailiyah,
Saudi Arabia. This project involved the design
of all utility systems, roads, drainage, land-
scaping, and irrigation.
Supervised a project team designing wastewater
collection facilities for the Jubail Industrial
Community being developed on the Arabian Gulf in
Saudi Arabia. Project included eight major pump-
ing stations and associated pipelines.
Project Engineer for the complete preliminary engi-
neering design of the Beltway Sewage Treatment
Plant extension, Houston.
Designed the drainage pumping station for Terminal
"0" at Houston Intercontinental Airport. This was
a 60.5 mgd station handling stormwater from the
road network and areas around the terminal.
D. Balfour & Sons, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates1
1977-1979, Resident Engineer.
Directed a team of engineers and technicians in
the supervision of construction of the sewage
collection and disposal system, including sewers,
pumping stations, and treatment works for a
population of 120,000 persons.
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
e
e
George O. puig, P.E.
Project Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Architectural
Engineering, 1968, University of Kansas
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas
Professional
Affiliations
American Concrete Institute
American Society of Civil Engineers
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1969-present, Manager, Construction
Administration.
Responsible for coordination of engineering
services on projects which include water and
sewage treatment plants, and water control
structures. Work includes preliminary reports,
preparation of plans and specifications, con-
struction administration, and the use of
computer-aided design and drafting techniques.
Representative projects include the following.
City of Houston East Water Purification Plant.
Consists of several projects including a separate
facility to treat 50 mgd of potable water, and
enlarging of the existing facility from 80 mgd to
125 mgd capacity; sludge processing facilities;
a flood protection system, and several steel
ground storage tanks.
A 25 mgd addition to an existing water plant for
Bell County WC&ID No.1 including a 17 mile-long
transmission line and prestressed ground storage
facilities. Also included an expansion of an
existing sewage treatment plant from 9 mgd to 15
mgd capacity.
City of Houston Southeast Water Purification
Plant. A new 160 mgd water purification plant
with an ultimate capacity of 750 mgd.
Sewage treatment facilities for Clear Lake City,
Kingwood, Texas A&M Univeristy, and many smaller
installations.
Finney and Turnipseed, Topeka, Kansas; 1967-1969,
Designer.
TurnerCollie<<5'Braden Inc.
e e
James W. Johnson, Jr., P.E.
Project Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1973,
Clemson University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1981:
Virginia, 1977
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas:
1978-present, Project Engineer.
Noteworthy projects include the following:
City of Alice, Texas and Alice Water Authority,
Raw Water Transmission Pipeline. Mechanical and
civil design of 20.S-mile 30-inch steel cylinder
reinforced concrete pipeline to include the addi-
tion of a 400-Hp raw water pump to an existing
pump station, metering facilities, pipeline surge
analysis, air release valve locations, and pipe
bend thrust restraints.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Tanajib Community Update.
Analyzed projected population density and associ-
ated water and wastewater demands and recommended
improvements to the utility system to include pot-
able water distribution system line sizes, distri-
bution pumpage and storage, water treatment plant
capacity, wastewater treatment plant and lift
station capacities, and wastewater gravity sewer
collection system line sizes.
HCUD No. S (Kingwood). Offsite 1,SOO-gpm water
well including well and well pump design, piping,
and control building.
Copperfield Sewage Treatment Plant, Harris County,
Texas. Structural design of reinforced concrete
structures, steel frame building, and lift station
steel hoist frame.
Velsicol Chemical Corporation, Beaumont, Texas:
1977-1978, Civil/Structural Design Engineer.
U.s. Army Corps of Engineers: 1973-1977,
Battalion Construction Officer.
TurnerCollie<f1Braden Inc.
e
e
Edward A. Cain, P.E.
Electrical Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Physics, 1966,
Texas A&I University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, Ohio
Professional
Affiliations
Illuminating Engineering Society
National Society of Professional Engineers
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1977-present, Manager - Electrical Design.
Provided supervision for all electrical engineering
for a 50-million-gallon-per-day expansion to the
City of Houston East Plant; the 34.75~gd expansion
to the Bell County Water Control and Improvement
District No.1 Water Treatment Plant; the Houston
Northeast Water Purification Plant which includes
a 60,000 KVA substation at 138 KV, and the Houston
Southeast Water Purification Plant which includes
cost-effective evaluation of electrical systems
and equipment.
Directed the design of a 34.5 KV site power distri-
bution system for NL Petroleum Services; the
electrical design for complete water supply system
and wastewater system for the City of Jubail,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; water pumping station for
the City of Dallas.
Served as manager for design of medium- and low-
voltage power systems for water and wastewater
plants for numerous clients.
3D/International, Houston, Texas; 1976-1977,
Senior Associate.
Jochen & Henderson Inc., Houston, Texas; 1968-1976,
Project Manager.
Houston Lighting & Power Company, Houston, Texas;
1966-1967, Illuminating Engineer.
TurnerColliel6Braden Inc.
e
e
William L. Pearson, P.E.
Mechanical Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical
Engineering, 1952, Texas A&M University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas:
1974-present, Senior Engineer.
Engineering design and management responsibili-
ties for a broad range of projects including
design of booster pump stations, wastewater
and water treatment plants, and municipal water
and wastewater systems.
Responsible for engineering design of a refinery
wastewater treatment plant involving oily water
separation and dissolved air flotation treatment,
an industrial waste treatment plant, industrial
stormwater pumping stations, sludge pumping and
pipeline facilities, industrial surface water
facilities, and condensate recovery and treatment
equipment.
Representative projects are as follows:
AMOCO Texas Refining Company project entailed
responsibility for design of a gravity thickener,
sludge pumping facilities, and 1,800 feet of
sludge pipeline to return supernatant.
EXXON Company U.S.A. Bay town Refinery project
entailed handling of degrading and sludge removal
for a 30-mi1lion-gallon-per-day wastewater stream
and gravity oil separator.
Argo International Corp., Houston, Texas: 1966-
1974, Regional Office Manager.
General Electric Company, Chicago, Illinois:
1952-1966, Application, Requisition, and Service
Engineer.
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
e
e
John Wells, P.E.
Senior Mechanical Engineer
Education
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering,
1965, Lehigh University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, New York
Professional
Affiliations
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Society of American Value Engineers
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas:
1978-present, Senior Mechanical Engineer.
Responsible for both process and mechanical designs
in the municipal and industrial areas.
Experienced in municipal and industrial water and
wastewater treatment. Water and wastewater experi-
ence includes preliminary design of wastewater and
combined sewer overflow treatment facilities,
comprehensive water supply planning, water rate
studies, municipal wastewater pilot plant programs,
and municipal water treatment studies.
Noteworthy projects include the following:
Final plans and specifications for mechanical/
civil portions of an 80-mgd raw water pump station
for the City of Houston, Texas.
Final plans and specifications for mechanical/
civil portions of l4-mgd expansions to Bellaire
Brays distribution pump station.
Final plans and specifications for mechanical
portion of 28-mgd expansion to Katy Addicks distri-
bution pump station.
Preliminary design of 5-mgd sewage treatment plant
for the Town of Colonie, New York.
TurnerCollie(6Braden Inc.
e e
Bradley H. Winkler, P.E.
Engineer
Education
Master of Environmental Engineering, 1978,
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1978,
Rice University
Registration
Professional Engineer: Texas, 1982
Experience
Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1977-present, Engineer.
Experienced in mechanical, process, and chemical
system design for wastewater and water treatment
plants. Prepared planning studies and engineering
reports for municipal and private clients. Devel-
oped bench-scale process testing programs for
water and wastewater treatment. Wrote operation
and maintenance manuals, and participated in on-
site start-up activities for wastewater treatment
plants.
Noteworthy projects include the following.
Bell County WCID No. 1 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Originated and supervised bench-scale tests for
confirmation of design parameters. Wrote opera-
tion and maintenance manual for this advanced
l5-mgd wastewater treatment plant. Provided on-
site start-up assistance and operator training.
Harris County Utility District No.5, Kingwood
Central Sewage Treatment Plant. Performed mechani-
cal, process, instrumentation, and civil design
for a 1.75-mgd expansion of this advanced waste-
water treatment plant.
Trinity Bay Conservation District. Facility
planning for installation of sewage collection
system serving a sparsely populated rural area.
City of Brenham Wastewater Treatment Plant
Evaluation. Plant-wide evaluation emphasizing
recommendations to upgrade process performance.
City of Houston, First Quadrennial Report on the
Physical Condition and Adequacy of Houston's
Sanitary Sewer System. Inspected 18 of the City's
sewage treatment plants.
TurnerCollie<<5Braden Inc.
e
e
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
MADE AND ENTERED INTO by and between the City of La Porte, Texas,
hereinafter called the "City," and Turner Collie & Braden Inc.,
hereinafter called the "Engineer."
RECITALS
The City intends to plan, design, and construct a relief sanitary
sewer from the western area of the City along Fairmont Parkway to the
existing City of La Porte Wastewater Treatment Facility. The City
also intends to plan, design, and construct improvements to the
existing City wastewater treatment facility and to the existing
College View MUD wastewater treatment facility and lift station.
Such improvements to the above described sanitary sewer system and
wastewater treatment facilities are hereinafter referred to as the
"Project."
CONTRACTUAL UNDERTAKINGS
SECTION I
EMPLOYMENT OF ENGINEER
The City agrees to employ the Engineer and the Engineer agrees
to perform professional engineering services in connection with the
Project as stated in the Sections to follow and as is described
in further detail on the attached Exhibit A entitled "Scope of
Services," and for having rendered such services, the City agrees
to pay to the Engineer compensation as stated in the Sections to
follow. The Engineer intends to make available the services of
the personnel shown on the attached Exhibit B entitled "Organiza-
tion Chart" through the duration of the project.
-1-
e
e
SECTION II
CHARACTER AND EXTENT OF SERVICES
The Engineer sh'all render the following professional services
necessary for the development of the Project:
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase - Basic Services
1. Prepare engineering report setting forth recommenda-
tions for the following items. Furnish City with
15 copies of report.
a. Develop plan for ultimate abandonment of existing
College View MUD wastewater treatment facility.
b. Develop plan for interim solids handling (sludge)
at existing College View MUD wastewater treatment
facility.
2. Prepare compliance sch.edule for College View MUD
wastewater treatment facility.
3. Prepare applications for amendments to existing TDWR
and NPDES (EPA) permits in conjunction with the pro-
posed expansion of the City's wastewater treatment
facility.
B. Preliminary Design Phase- Basic Services
1. Attend preliminary conference with the City regarding
the Project.
2. Perform preliminary engineering services in connection
with Project in sufficient detail to indicate clearly
the problems involved and the alternate solutions
available to the City, to include preliminary layouts,
sketches, and estimates of probable cost for the
Project, and to set forth clearly the Engineer's
recommendations. Prepare preliminary engineering
reports specifically for the following items.
a. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer. Develop
trunk sewer sizes, alignment, and connections to
existing system(s) from the existing College View
-2-
e
e
Municipal Utility District (MUD) wastewater treat-
ment facility lift station to the City's waste-
water treatment facility. The relief sanitary
sewer in conjunction with the existing Fairmont
Parkway trunk sewer is to convey year 2003 flows
to the City's main wastewater treatment facility.
b. Expansion of the City's main wastewater treatment
facility from an average capacity of 2.5 million
gallons per day (mgd) and a maximum wet weather
capacity of 6.25 mgd to an average capacity of
4.0 mgd and a maximum wet weather capacity of
16.0 mgd.
c. Expansion of College View MUD Lift station to
convey flows from the abandoned College View MUD
wastewater treatment facility and its service
area to the proposed relief sanitary sewer on
Fairmont Parkway.
3. Furnish the City 15 copies of the preliminary design
report(s), including preliminary layouts, sketches,
and cost estimates.
C. Final Design Phase - Basic Services
1. Establish the scope and advise the City of any soil
and foundation investigations or any design surveys
or special testing which, in the opinion of the Engi-
neer, may be required for the proper execution of the
Project; and arrange with the City for the conduct of
such investigations, surveys, and tests. (The perform-
mance of these investigations and tests is not a part
of the Engineer's basic services, and compensation
therefor is not included in the Basic Charge; it may
be performed by the Engineer, by agreement with the
City, in which case compensation shall be determined
by the applicable portions of Section VI.)
-3-
e
e
2. Furnish to the City, where required by the circum-
stances of the assignment, the engineering data
necessary for applications for routine permits by
local and state authorities (as distinguished from
detailed applications and supporting documents for
government grants-in-aid, or to meet the requirements
of special programs of the federal government other
than those specified in Section II, Paragraph A.3.
above).
3. Upon written authorization of the City, prepare
detailed specifications and contract drawings of
facilities listed in Section II, Paragraph B.2.
These designs shall be submitted to the applicable
state and federal agencies for approval.
4. Prepare detailed estimates of probable costs and
proposals of authorized construction, which shall
include summaries of bid items and quantities which
will be based, wherever practical, on the unit price
system of bidding. The Engineer shall not be
required to guarantee the accuracy of these estimates.
5. Furnish to the City 50 copies of approved plans,
specifications, notices to bidders, and proposals for
each construction contract. All copies in excess of
50 shall be paid for separately as specified in
Section VI.
D. Construction Phase - Basic Services
10 Assist the City in the advertisement of the Project
for bids.
2. Assist the City in the opening and tabulation of
bids for construction of the Project, and recommend
to the City as to the proper action on all proposals
received.
-4-
e
e
3. Assist in the preparation of formal Contract Docu-
ments for the contracts.
4. Provide the services of a Registered Professional
Engineer experienced in each aspect of plant design
and construction to make visits to the site at least
once every two weeks during construction and at all
critical points of construction (as distinguished
from the continuous services of a resident Project
Representative described in paragraph E.ll. below).
The Engineer is to observe the progress and quality
of the executed work and to determine in general if
the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract
Documents. In performing this service, the Engineer
will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous
on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity
of the work or material: he will not be responsible
for the techniques and sequences of construction or
the safety precautions incident thereto, and he will
not be responsible or liable in any degree for the
contractors' failure to perform the construction
work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
During visits to the construction site, and on the
basis of the Engineer's on-site observations, he
will keep the City informed in writing of the extent
of the progress of the work, and advise the City of
material and substantial defects and deficiencies in
the work of contractors which are discovered by the
Engineer or otherwise brought to the Engineer's atten-
tion in the course of construction.
5. Consult and advise with the City: issue all instruc-
tions to the contractor requested by the City: and
prepare routine change orders as required.
-5-
.
e
6. Check and review samples, catalog data, schedules,
shop drawings, laboratory, shop and mill tests of
materials and equipment and other data which the con-
tractor is required to submit, only for conformance
with the design concept of the Project and compliance
with the information given by the Contract Documents;
and assemble written guarantees which are required by
the Contract Documents.
7. Prepare monthly and final estimates for payments to
contractors, and furnish to the City any necessary
certifications as to payments to contractors and
suppliers.
8. Conduct, in company with the City, a final inspection
of the Project for conformance with the design concept
of the Project and compliance with the Contract Docu-
ments, and recommend in writing final payment to the
contractors.
9. Revise contract drawings, with the assistance of the
Contractor, to provide record drawings of the completed
Project. The Engineer will use his best efforts and
will exercise the usual degree of care in preparing
these drawings; he shall not be required to guarantee
the accuracy of the record drawings. Furnish a set of
reproducibles of these record drawings to the City.
E. Special Services
If authorized in writing by City, Engineer shall furnish
or obtain from others Special Services of the following types
which are not considered normal or customary Basic Services
except to the extent provided otherwise in scope of work; these
will be paid for by City as indicated in Section VI.
1. By subcontract or otherwise, perform field surveys,
title searches, plats, metes and bounds descriptions,
-6-
e
e
and office computations and drafting related to the
tasks.
2. Travel expenses when authorized by the City to points
other than the Engineer's office, City offices, or the
Project Area.
3. By subcontract or otherwise, perform soil consulta-
tions and/or test borings, and acquire other similar
information, investigations, and analyses.
4. Prepare special reports or studies required by
the City not covered under Basic Services.
5. Preparation of environmental statements and assistance
to City in preparing for and attending public
hearings. Appearances before regulatory agencies.
6. Assist the City as an expert witness or otherwise in
connection with any litigation with third parties or
administrative proceedings arising in relation to the
Project, provided such litigation was not caused by
the failure of the Engineer to perform in the first
instance.
7. After the final plans and specifications have been
approved by the City, evaluate items submitted by the
City to the Engineer for evaluation pursuant to the
Substitution Clause of a construction contract,
evaluate proposals for change orders, prepare change
orders, or revise plans and specifications, provided
that these services (a) are not made necessary by a
failure of the Engineer to perform in the first
instance and (b) take more than eight (8) hours of
services by the Engineer's employees to complete per
item.
8. Perform services related to a readvertisement for bids
(not caused by the Engineer's failure to perform in
the first instance).
-7-
e
e
9. Services resulting from significant changes in extent
of the Project or its design including, but not
limited to, changes in size, complexity, City's
schedule, or character of construction or method of
financing; and revising previously accepted studies,
reports, design documents, or Contract Documents when
such revisions are due to causes beyond Engineer's
control.
10. Additional or extended services during construction
made necessary by (a) work damaged by fire or other
cause during construction, (b) a significant amount
of defective or neglected work of Contractor(s),
(c) prolongation of the contract time of any prime
contract by more than 120 days, or (d) default by
Contractor(s), all through no fault of Engineer.
11. Provide one or more experienced and qualified Resident
Project Representatives, as approved by the City
Manager, one of whom shall be designated by the
Engineer as the Chief Representative. The Resident
Project Representative shall provide continuous,
on-the-site observation of the construction work,
including the material furnished and the workmanship
provided. The Chief Representative shall make a
daily written report to the City with respect to the
material furnished, the workmanship provided, and
the progress of the work, all in relationship to the
construction contract documents, provided, however,
the Resident Project Representatives need not be
registered professional engineers, and provided
further, that unless the circumstances otherwise
warrant, the Resident .Project Representatives shall
not be required to make exhaustive on-the-site
inspections to check the quality or quantity of the
-8-
e
e
work or material and shall not be required to check
the techniques and sequences of construction or the
safety precautions incident thereto.
SECTION III
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
No professional services of any nature shall be undertaken by
the Engineer under this Agreement until he has received written
authorization from the City. Each Phase of Basic Services and each
item of Special Services shall be authorized by separate letters of
authorization signed by the City Manager.
SECTION IV
PERIOD OF SERVICE
The Engineer agrees to perform services diligently and to com-
plete services under Section II A. within forty-five (45) calendar
days after execution of Agreement and under Sections II B. and
II C. (1) Fairmont Parkway Relief Sewer within one hundred eighty
(180) calendar days after execution of Agreement and (2) existing
City wastewater treatment facility expansion within two hundred
forty (240) calendar days after execution of Agreement. This
Agreement shall be effective upon execution by the City and the
Engineer and shall remain in force until final payment for services
called for under Section II.D.9. has been made or until terminated
under the provisions hereinafter provided in Section VIII.
SECTION V
COORDINATION WITH THE OWNER
The Engineer shall hold periodic conferences with the City
Manager and/or his designated representatives to the end that
the Project, as perfected, shall have full benefit of the City's
experience and knowledge of existing needs and facilities and be
consistent with its current policies and construction standards.
To implement this coordination, the City shall make available to
the Engineer, for use in planning the Project, all existing plans,
-9-
e
e
maps, field notes, statistics, computations, and other data in
his possession relative to existing facilities and to the Project.
SECTION VI
THE ENGINEER'S COMPENSATION
The City shall compensate the Engineer for Basic Services
performed under this Agreement on a "Lump Sum" basis of compensation.
Such compensation shall be as outlined below for each phase of the
Project. Special Services provided by the Engineer shall be compen-
sated as hereinafter provided for in this Section.
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $12,000 (Twelve Thousand Dollars)
shall be full compensation for the Basic Services Fee for
this phase of the Project. Partial payments for services in
the Special Studies and Reports Phase shall be made monthly.
Payments will be made in proportion to that part of the ser-
vices which has been completed, as evidenced by monthly
statements submitted by the Engineer to the City. Final
payment for services in the Special Studies and Report Phase
shall be due upon completion of these services.
B. Preliminary Design Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $58,000 (Fifty-Eight Thousand
Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic Services
Fee for this phase of the Project. Partial payments for
services in the Preliminary Design Phase shall be made
monthly. Payments will be made in proportion to that part
of the services in the Preliminary Design Phase which has
been accomplished, as evidenced by monthly statements
submitted by the Engineer to the City. Final payment for
services in the Preliminary Design Phase shall be payable
upon submission to the City of the required report(s),
sketches, and estimates, and upon the City's acceptance
of these submittals, which shall be within 30 days after
submission.
-10-
e
.
C. Final Design Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $252,000 (Two Hundred Fifty-Two
Thousand Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic
Services Fee for this phase of the Project. Partial payments
for services in the Final Design Phase shall be made monthly.
Payments will be made in proportion to that part of the ser-
vices in the Final Design Phase which has been accomplished,
as evidenced by monthly statements submitted by the Engineer
to the City. Final payment for services authorized in the
Final Design Phase shall be due upon the completion of these
services.
D. Construction Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $78,000 (Seventy-Eight Thousand
Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic Services
Fee for this phase of the Project. This sum will be paid in
monthly installments in proportion to the construction work
completed, on the basis of the Engineer's estimates prepared
for monthly payments to contractors. Upon completion of all
work authorized in the Construction Phase, the Engineer will
be paid the remainder of the charge for this Phase.
E. Special Services Not Included in Above Lump Sum Charges
The charges above described in the Special Studies and
Reports, Preliminary Design, Final Design, and Construction
phases shall provide compensation to the Engineer for all
services called for under this Agreement to be performed by
him, or under his direction, except the services set forth
below. These excluded Special Services, and the compensation
to be paid by the City to the Engineer for their performance,
as required, are as follows:
Service
Basis of Compensation
1. Field surveys to collect
information required for
design.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
-11-
e
2. Special investigative
assignments.
3. Preparation of environ-
mental statements and
assistance to City in
preparing for and
attending public
hearings.
4. Services of a resident
Project Representative,
and other field person-
nel as required, for
on-the-site observation
and for construction
layout surveys.
5. Soil and foundation
investigations, includ-
ing test borings, soil
tests, and analyses of
test results.
6. Land surveys and estab-
lishment of boundaries
and monuments.
7. Preparation of property
or easement descriptions.
8. Preparation of any
special reports required
for marketing of bonds.
9. Appearances before
regulatory agencies.
10. Assistance to the City
as an expert witness in
any litigations with
third parties, arising
from the development or
construction of Project.
11. Travel expenses to points
other than Engineer's
office, City offices, or
Project Area (except item
E.4 above).
-12-
.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
Project Representative
travel cost between
Engineer's office and
Project area at 35 cents
per mile.
Actual subcontract cost
and other direct non-
labor expense at invoice
cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct non labor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
$375 per diem for each
day, or part thereof, in
which Engineer's presence
is required by City.
Actual invoice cost.
Travel by vehicles owned
or leased by the Engineer
shall be at 35 cents per
mile.
e
e
12. Additional copies of
reports and specifica-
tions and additional
blueprint copies of
drawings over the number
of copies specified under
Basic Services.
Reimbursement for direct
nonlabor expense and sub-
contract expense at invoice
cost.
Payments to the Engineer for authorized Special Services shall
be made monthly, by the City, upon presentation of monthly state-
ments by the Engineer of such services. "Salary Cost" is defined
as the cost of salaries (total hours worked times the employee's
rate of pay on an hourly basis) of the Engineer's employees for
time directly chargeable to the Project, plus 27 percent for social
security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes,
employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, incentive
pay, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and
holiday pay applicable thereto. The "Salary Cost" for the services
of the Engineer's officers shall be at their regular "Salary Cost,"
as defined above, not to exceed $40.00 per hour. In addition, an
overtime premium for draftsmen and technician classifications will
be charged for which the Engineer's technical staff works in excess
of 40 hours. The overtime premium shall be one-half the employee's
Salary Cost times 2.25. The overtime premium will be charged only
because of the City's requirements and upon its specific
authorization.
The maximum amount payable for Basic Services under this
Agreement is $400,000 (Four Hundred Thousand Dollars). This maximum
amount payable may be revised in the event of changes in extent,
complexity, or character of work as authorized in writing by the
City. The maximum amount payable for Special Services shall be
authorized in writing by the City for each individual assignment.
No Special Services shall be provided in excess of the amount
authorized.
Payments to the Engineer for authorized services will be made
monthly by the City upon presentation of monthly statements by the
Engineer of such services. Monthly statements will include detailed
-13-
e e
backup information requested by City. Payments shall be due upon
receipt by the City of any such statement. All remittances shall be
mailed or delivered to Engineer's office in Houston, Harris County,
Texas.
If City fails to make any payment due Engineer for services
and expenses within sixty days after receipt of Engineer's bill
therefor, the amounts due Engineer shall include a charge at the
rate of 12 percent per annum from said sixtieth day, and in addi-
tion, Engineer may, after giving seven days written notice to
Owner, suspend services under this Agreement until he has been
paid in full all amounts due him from services and expenses.
SECTION VII
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Original documents, plans, designs, and survey notes developed
in connection with services performed hereunder belong to, and
remain the property of the City, in consideration of which it is
mutually agreed that the City will use them solely in connection
with the Project, save with the express consent of the Engineer.
The Engineer may retain reproducible copies of such documents.
SECTION VIII
TERMINATION
Either party to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement by
giving to the other 30 days' notice in writing. Upon delivery of
such notice by the City to the Engineer, and upon expiration of
the 30-day period, the Engineer shall discontinue all services in
connection with the performance of this Agreement and shall proceed
to cancel promptly all existing orders and contracts insofar as
such orders or contracts are chargeable to this Agreement. As
soon as practicable after receipt of notice of termination, the
Engineer shall submit a statement, showing in detail the services
performed under this Agreement to the date of termination. The
City shall then pay the Engineer promptly that proportion of the
-14-
e
e
prescribed charges which the services called for under this Agree-
ment, less such payments on account of the charges as have been
previously made. Copies of all completed or partially completed
designs, plans, and specifications prepared under this Agreement
shall be delivered to the City when and if this Agreement is termi-
nated, but subject to the restrictions, as to their use, as set
forth in Section VII.
SECTION IX
ADDRESS OF NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS
All notices and communications under this Agreement to be
mailed or delivered to Engineer shall be to the following address:
Turner Collie & Braden Inc.
P.O. Box 13089
Houston, Texas 77219
Attention: Mr. H. P. McAlister, P.E.
All notices and communications under this Agreement to be
mailed or delivered to the City shall be to the following address:
City of La Porte
P.O. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas
Attention: Mr.
77551
Jack Owen
SECTION X
SECTION CAPTIONS
Each Section under the contractual undertakings has been
supplied with a caption to serve only as a guide to the contents.
The caption does not control the meaning of any Section or in any
way determine its interpretation or application.
SECTION XI
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS
The City and the Engineer each binds himself and his successors,
executors, administrators, and assigns to the other party of this
Agreement and to the successors, executors, administrators, and
assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this
Agreement. Except as above, neither the City nor the Engineer
shall assign, sublet, or transfer his interest in this Agreement
without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be
-15-
e
e
construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any
officer or agent of any public body which may be a party thereto.
SECTION XII
INSPECTIONS AND AUDIT
The City shall have the right to perform, or cause to be
performed, audits of the books and records of the Engineer and
inspections of all places where work is undertaken in connection
with this Agreement, provided that the Engineer shall not be
required to keep such books and records longer than two (2)
years after the termination of this Agreement.
EXECUTED IN two counterparts (each of which is an original) on
behalf of Engineer by its Senior Vice President shown below, and on
behalf of City by its Mayor (thereunto duly authorized) this
day of
, 1984.
TURNER COLLIE & BRADEN INC.
ATTEST:
L. A. Bouffard
Assistant Secretary
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
Senior Vice President
CITY OF LA PORTE
ATTEST:
Virginia Cline
Mayor
Title:
-16-
e
e
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase
1. Prepare engineering report for interim operation and ulti-
mate abandonment of existing College View MUD wastewater
treatment facility.
a. Determine requirements for abandonment of existing
facility.
b. Determine the need for demolition of existing facility.
c. Evaluate existing equipment and materials and determine
if there are any salvageable or reusable items.
d. Determine the ultimate use of the site and required
site improvements.
e. Evaluate sludge handling options for interim operation.
(1) Additional sludge drying beds.
(2) Dewatering with mobile equipment.
(3) Hauling of liquid sludge.
2. Prepare compliance schedule for College View MUD wastewater
treatment facility.
a. Prepare draft schedule detailing interim and final
measures to be taken by the City to reduce and eliminate
noncomplying discharges.
b. Review the draft schedule with the City and the Texas
Department of Water Resources (TDWR) staff.
c. Prepare final compliance schedule.
3. Prepare permit applications for amendments to existing TDWR
and NPDES discharge permits.
a. Prepare technical information on proposed plant expan-
sion, including unit capacities, influent and effluent
quality, data on surrounding property owners, and
other required information.
A-l
.
.
b. Prepare a technical report to support the applications
for amended permits, including appropriate exhibits and
tables.
c. Prepare application forms for execution by the City.
4. Submit compliance schedule to regulatory agencies.
5. Submit permit applications to regulatory agencies.
B. Preliminary Design Phase
1. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Determine trunk sewer sizes, lengths, slopes, and
depths.
b. Evaluate alternative sewer locations within the
right-of-way.
c. Investigate and resolve conflicts with existing
pipelines and underground utilities.
d. Evaluate and make recommendations on alternative
sewer materials.
e. Determine requirements for modifications or abandon-
ment of existing lift stations.
f. Determine details of connections to existing sewers.
g. Evaluate storage capacity of trunk sewers.
h. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
i. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
j. Present preliminary design recommendations.
k. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
2. Main Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Prepare preliminary process design calculations.
b. Determine sizes and capacities of process units.'
c. Prepare preliminary hydraulic profile calculations.
d. Evaluate alternative treatment equipment.
e. Review existing plant facilities and determine
capacities of existing equipment and treatment units.
f. Prepare preliminary equipment selections.
A-2
.
.
g. Prepare preliminary site layout for proposed
improvements.
h. Prepare preliminary layouts for proposed equipment and
treatment units.
(1) Modifications to existing lift station.
(2) New lift station.
(3) Modifications to existing headworks.
(4) New headworks.
(5) Aeration basins.
(6) Final clarifiers.
(7) Aerobic digester.
(8) Return sludge pumping station.
(9) Chlorine contact basins.
(10) Chlorination facility.
(11) Blowers.
(12) Plant piping.
(13) Electrical improvements.
(14) Instrumentation and control system.
i. Evaluate requirements for future expansion.
j. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
k. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
I. Present preliminary design recommendations.
m. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
3. College View MUD Lift Station
a. Evaluate lift station modifications required to serve
initial design area.
b. Evaluate lift station modifications required to serve
ultimate design area.
c. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
d. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
e. Present preliminary design recommendations.
f. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
A-3
e
e
C. Final Design Phase
1. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
2. Main Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
3. College View MUD Lift Station
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
A-4
e
.
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
D. Construction Phase
l. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
2. Main Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
A-5
e
.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
I. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
3. College View MUD Lift Station
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
A-6
..
EXHIBIT B - ORGANIZATION CHART
CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
r
e
e
PROJECT DIRECTOR
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
TECHNICAL ADVISOR
AND
ALTERNATE PROJECT DIRECTOR ---------------
Neil E. Bishop, P.E., Ph.D.
PROJECT MANAGER
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
I I
PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER
MAIN WASTEWATER TREATMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASE FAIRMONT PARKWAY RELIEF
PLANT EXPANSION SERVICES SAN IT ARY SEWER
Peter J. Goldsmith, P.E. George O. Puig, P.E. James W. Johnson, P.E.
TurnerCollie0Braden Inc.