HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-20 Regular Meeting of La Porte City CouncilI
• MINUTES
OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 20, 1984
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cline at 7:00 P.M.
Members of City Council Present: Mayor Virginia Cline,
Councilpersons Deotis Gay, B. Don Skelton, Linda Westergren,
Norman Malone, John Longley, Kevin Graves, Lindsay Pfeiffer
Members of City Council Absent: Ed Matuszak
Members of City Staff Present: City Manager Jack Owen, City
Attorney Knox Askins, City Secretary Cherie Black, Director
of Community Development John Joerns
Others Present: Neil Bishop and Cecil Allen, Turner Collie
& Braden; Mr. and Mrs. Snipes, Cadillac Cab Co.; Arlene Arends,
Bayshore Sun-Broadcaster; Linnea Schlobohm, Baytown Sun; one
citizen
• 2. The invocation was given by Councilperson Malone.
3. Council considered approving the minutes of the regular
meeting held June 6, 1984.
Motion was made by Councilperson Skelton to approve the
minutes of the June 6 meeting as presented. Second by
Councilperson Pfeiffer. The motion carried, 8 ayes and 0 nays.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone, Longley,
Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
Nays: None
4. Council considered approving the minutes of the special called
meeting held June 13, 1984.
Motion was made by Council erson Malone to approve the minutes
of the special called meeting held June 13 as presented.
Second by Councilperson Longley. The motion carried, 7 ayes,
0 nays, 1 abstain.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone, Longley,
Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
Nays: None
Abstain: Councilperson Graves (was not present at 6-13~meeting)
•
I
~ ~
• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council
June 20, 1984, Page 2
Councilperson Matuszak arrived at the Council table at
7:05 P.M.
5. Council considered approving a taxicab permit for Mrs. Jo Ann
Snipes, Cadillac Cab Company.
Mrs. Snipes was present and answered questions from Council.
Motion was made by Councilperson Pfeiffer to approve the
taxicab permit for Cadillac Cab Company. Second by Council-
person Matuszak. The motion carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone, Longley,
Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
Nays: None
6. Council considered approving a contract with Turner Collie &
Braden for wastewater system improvements.
It was noted by the City Manager that the suggested change
• had been made to the wording in the contract, i.e., on page 2,
the word "indicate" was changed to "identify."
Motion was made by Councilperson Westergren to approve the
contract with Turner Collie & Braden for wastewater system
improvements. Second by Councilperson .Graves. The motion
carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone, Longley,
Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
Nays: None
7. Council considered authorizing going out for bids for restora-
tion of Carter Trust property.
Motion was made by Councilperson Matuszak to tab le~this item
until such time as we are apprised whether or not FEMA will
subsidize purchase of the property. Second by Councilperson
Graves.
After lengthy discussion on the pros and cons of whether to buy
the property with or without FEMA participation, bid specifi-
cations, property value, etc., the vote was taken and the motion
was defeated, 8 nays and 1 aye.
Ayes: Councilperson Matuszak
• Nays: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone, Longley,
Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
I
I
•
• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council
June 20, 1984, Page 3
Motion was made by Councilperson Graves to authorize staff
to go out for bids for the restoration of the Carter Trust
property, restoration contingent upon FEMA's reply regardin
whether or not they will participate in purchase of the
property. Second by Councilperson Malone. The motion car-
ried, 9 ayes and 0 nays.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone,
Longley, Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
Nays: None
8. Council considered authorizing payroll deductions for dental
program.
Motion was made by Councilperson Westergren to approve
authorizing payroll deductions for the dental program.
Second by Councilperson Malone. The motion carried, 8 ayes
1 nay.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Westergren, Malone, Longley,
Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
• Nays: Councilperson Skelton
9. Council considered appointing a member to the Industrial
Development Corporation.
Motion was made by Councilperson Pfeiffer to ap oint J. M.
"Mike" Jackson to the Industrial Development Corporation.
Second by Councilperson Malone. The motion carried, 9 ayes
and 0 nays.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone, Longley,
Matuszak, Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
Nays: None
10. Council considered cancelling the regular meeting scheduled
for July 4, due to the holiday.
Motion was made by Councilperson Westergren to cancel the
meeting scheduled for July 4. Second by Councilperson Skelton.
The motion carried, 8 ayes and 1 nay. ~.
Ayes: Councilpersons Gay, Skelton, Westergren, Malone,
Longley, Graves, Pfeiffer and Mayor Cline
Nays: Councilperson Matuszak
:]
I
I
•
• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council
June 20, 1984, Page 4
11. Administrative Reports
Mr. Owen reported the auction had generated sales of
$41,606, and that La Porte's portion of that totaled
$21,366.50.
12. Council Action
Skelton: Appreciates the notification that the letter had
been sent to the engineer regarding the sidewalk on "G"
Street between Broadway and San Jacinto.
Reported that the trash bins had been moved.
Westergren: Announced the 4th of July festivities to be
held at Sylvan Beach from 9:00 A.M. until 9:00 P.M.
Malone: Commented on the proposed trip to the Houston Lighting
& Power facility in Rosenberg. He has made the tour and it
was very interesting.
Mayor Cline polled Council and four would be able to go during
• the week of July 9-13th. The City Secretary will make the
reservations.
Longley: Would like for the City Manager to be thinking about
what to do with the land in Fairmont Park where the old sewer
plant was located.
Owen: Part of it will need to be retained as a lift station.
Staff will soon be compiling a list of all small parcels of
land owned by the City to bring to Council to see what they would
like to do with the land.
Matuszak: Mr. Longley is talking about restoration of ground.
If you dug up that ground you'd find a sewer plant turned
upside-down in it. We're not going to restore our own land
even though it's quite beneficial. We can bury debris on
that particular land on a commercial strip that borders on
Fairmont Parkway. However, when you talk about next to the
Public Works where it's ash and not concrete, it's a different
story.
Thanks to Jack for requesting to Houston Lighting & Power
the lights on either end of Driftwood. He's sure the folks
will appreciate that. How long does a request like that
usually take?
•
I
I
• ~
• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council
June 20, 1984, Page 5
The Mayor replied that it usually takes three or four months.
Graves: In regards to our recent auction - I hope we don't
have any surprises coming up next week like tractors and
brush hogs.
Has gotten a couple of complaints on the Southern Pacific
crossing at 225; it's getting bad again.
Appreciates B. Don Skelton picking up the ball on the side-
walk on "G" Street. He had requested something be done
a long time ago, but had dropped the ball somewhere along
the line.
His street is "bleeding up" badly and it is ruining his
carpet from being tracked into the house. Can something be
done; can we look into hot mix overlay rather than the two-
course? It has had to have something done to it every year.
Pfeiffer: Would like to get the paper to publicize the
"Solicitation Ordinance." In the last two weeks he has had
3 or 4 people come to his house selling something, who haven't
• gone through the proper procedures. The intent of the ordi-
nance is to give people peace of mind; he thinks the public
should be reminded again that we do have an ordinance, and
if they have someone come up they need to inform them of the
ordinance, and also to let someone with the City know.
Cline: Has received a letter from the 9-1-1 Emergency Net-
work executive director. Their board .has elected to hold
their monthly meetings in surrounding cities that are partici-
pating in the 9-1-1 program. These meetings are held the
first Thursday of the month at 10:00 A.M. Would Council like
to host a meeting?
It was agreed that La Porte would host a. meeting. The City
Secretary will send the form back to the 9-1-l~board to inform
them what date we would like to host.
She has received a lot of phone calls about water bills. She
read a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Perry protesting the high rates.
The letter mentioned that there was a rumor that there would be
a meeting at the old MUD office between the City and Brookglen
residents. Was Mr. Owen aware of such a meeting?
Mr. Owen replied he was not aware of a meeting, although Bob
Herrera has talked of sending a letter to the residents out
• there to explain how their previous payments were set up and
what they covered, and the City of La Porte structure.
I
•
• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council
June 20, 1984, Page 6
Mr. Malone commented that he had gotten two separate water
bills for the same amount in the same month, and that Mr.
Post had called him and said he had gotten two bills for his
mobile home park the same month for the same amount. Apparently
there is an error somewhere and some people are being double
billed. Mr. Owen will look into the matter.
Mr. Skelton reminded Council that Thursday night is Harris
County Mayors' and Councils' meeting at Monument Inn.
13. There was no executive session.
14. There being no further business to come before the Council,
the meeting was duly adjourned at 8:08 P.M.
Respectfully submitted:
Cherie Black, City Secretary
• Passed & Approved this
the 18~h day of July,
1[9 8
. / w ~ _ ~~
inia Cline, Mayor
•
I
1 i
•
MEMORANDUM
June 5, 1984
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Secretary
SUBJECT: Taxi Permit Application - Mrs. Jo Ann Snipes
Gary Webb, owner of Cadillac Cab Company, is in the
process of selling the company to his mother-in-law, Mrs. Jo
Ann Snipes.
Mrs. Snipes has submitted an application for a permit
to operate the cab company. She plans to run three taxis
and carry the same insurance coverage that Mr. Webb did.
•
Cherie Black
CB/
•
,~
•i
~~
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA PORTE
T0: Mayor Cline and Councilpersons
• FROM: Jack Owen
SUBJECT: La Porte Sanitary Sewer Improvements Contract with
Turner Collie & Braden, Inc.
DATE: May 3,.1984
Attached is a proposed contract with support data submitted
by Turner Collie & Braden, Inc, for certain sanitary sewer
improvements. The Staff has conferred with TC & B concerning
this draft but has not had time to review it in the present
form. A meeting has been scheduled for May 8th for a complete
review of the proposed contract.
One of the conditions imposed by the Texas Water COmm1SSlOri
for the sale of the College View Bonds is that an engineering
contract be executed no later than June 24, 1984.
We are, therefore, placing this item on the May 9th Workshop
en da .
• ack Owen
JO/llh
attachment
~~
.. •
\ -~"--
•
•
•
u
9
>~:
TumerCollie~Braden Inc.
April 30, 1984
Mr. Jack Owen
City Manager
City of La Porte
P. 0. ~ Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77551
Re: La Porte Sanitary Sewer System Improvements
Turner Collie & Braden Job No. 13-02000-010
Dear Jack,
H. CECIL ALIEN
VICE PRESIDENT
PO BOX 13089
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77219
5757 WOODWAY
713 780.4100
TELEX 774185 TCB HOU
We are happy to present two (2) draft copies of an Agreement
for Engineering Services for your review for the above ref-
erenced project.
We estimate that the probable Total Construction Costs for the
project will be $7,721,000 (see Attachment "A"). We propose
to provide engineering for the Basic Services outlined in this
Agreement for $400,000 (see Attachment "A") and we estimate
that the Special Services will be approximately $315,000 (see
Attachment "A"), should the City authorize full time construc-
tion Project Representatives for both construction contracts.
If the City elects to furnish one or more of the Project
Representatives or elects to have only part time services
provided on one or more of the construction contracts, the
cost would be less. The responsibilities of the construction
Project Representatives will include on-site observation of
construction, review of materials and workmanship, preparation
of daily written reports, and daily communication and co-
ordination with the contractors. Basically, the Project
Representative's function is to see that the construction work
is completed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
Attachment "B" represents a breakdown of probable construction
costs into those attributable to abandonment of the College
View MUD wastewater treatment facility and conveyance of its
flow to the existing City main wastewater treatment facility
and those that can be attributed directly to the growth of
the City of La Porte.
Attachment "C" presents the general tasks required to complete
this project and includes both Basic Services and Special
Service items.
~~~~ ~
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • TEXAS AUSTIN/DALLAS/EL PASO/HOUSTON/PORT ARTHUR COLORADO DENVER/CRAND JUNCTION
• ~ ~ •
n
U
•
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
April 30, 1984
Mr. Jack Owen
City of La Porte
Page Two
Attachment "D" is an analysis of basic services engineering
fees for a project of this size based on the fee curves shown
in the TSPE manual. Our proposed fee for basic services is
$85,000 below the fee calculated from the curves. This amount
represents the value of the recently completed Comprehensive
Wastewater Collection and Treatment Plan as it applies to this
project plus the value of other work we performed for the City.
Attachment "E" presents the resumes of the key personnel involved
in this project. The resumes of the Principal in Charge, Project
Director, alternate Project Director, Project Manager and Project.
Engineers are included, along with the resumes of several of the
primary design engineers available to work on this assignment.
We propose to complete the Preliminary Design and Final Design
phases within 180 days after authorization (150 days to complete
work and 30 days for approval of plans and specifications) for
the Fairmont Parkway Relief Sewer and within 240 days after
authorization (210 days to complete work and 30 days for approval
of plans and specifications) for the Expansion of the Main
Wastewater Treatment Facility. All work outlined in Paragraphs
II.A. and II.B. of the Agreement will be finished within 45
days after authorization.
Should you or your staff wish to discuss any of the information
presented here in more detail, we would be happy to do so. We
appreciate the opportunity to submit this Agreement for Engineer-
ing Services for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
~~-'~"
i
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
Project Director
HCA:RCR:lf
Attachments
cc: Jerry Hodge w/attachments
• John Joerns w/attachments
! -~ = •
_~_
•
L
AttacYutient "A"
La rur ~i SWilta.~ -1iGWG.a' Sy~~ilL ~`IprVVCiIr.~{itr7
•
C~. WLL iS I...I. u~W J \.r\./St5
1. Relief Sanitary Sewer $4,311,000
2. Main Sewage Treatment Plant Expansion 3,365,000
3. Modifications to College View Lift Station 45,000
Total Construction Cost* $7,721,000
B. EngineeringCosts
1. Basic Servioes
a. Special Studies and Reports Phase $ 12,000
b. Preliminary Design Phase 58,000
c. Final Design Phase 252,000
d. Construction Phase 78,000
Subtotal Basic Services $ 400,000
2. Special Services
a. Surveys $ 30,000
b. Geotechnical Work 35,000
c. Miscellaneous Engineering Assigrm~x~ts 10,000
d. Project Representatives 240,000
Subtotal Special Services $ 315,000
Total Engineering Costs $ 715,000
•
Total Costs** $8,436,000
•
.*Includes 15$ Construction Contingencies
**Does not include land costs, legal fees or cost of bared sales associated
with Project
E~
~. ~
.. • ~ ~ i
~`
•
•
•
r~
City of La Porte
Fairn~ont Parkway Trunk Sewer
ESTIMATED vrx~unnT ~' CCI~TSTRUCTICN COSTS
60" MRCP 5,200 l.f. $ 200
54" MRCP 8,000 180
48" MRCP 3,500 160
24" MCP 3,600 60
21" RCP 2,600 50
12" FM 6,500 25
Siphons 4 50,000
Contingencies (15~)
TOTAL
2/27/84
$1,040,000
1,440,000
560,000
216,000
130,000
162,500
200,000
$3,748,500
562,500
$4,311,000
~ S
'. ,
•
•
•
•
2/27/84
City of La Porte
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
ESTIMATE PROBAflLE CC~TSTRUCTICi~i CO5TS
Lift Station - upgrade existing
- add. new station
Headworks - modify existing
- add new
Aeration Basins
Final Clarifiers
Aerobic Digester
Return Sludge P~nping Statical
Chlorine Contact Basins
Chlorination Facilities
Blowers
Plant Piping
Electrical
Total Plant
Plant Relief Sewer
Subtotal
Contingencies (15~
TOTAL
$ 100,000
500,000
50,000
300,000
400,000
400,000
120,000
200,000
150,000
60,000
60,000
350,000
130;000
$2', 820, 000
106,000
$2,926,000
439,000
$3,365,000
~,
•
•
•
•
• r •
-~ t_„ '
AttachmQ.nt "B"
Breakdown of Probable Construction Costs
A. College View MUD Share
21" VCP 22,900 l.f. $ 50 $1,145,000
12" F.M. 6,500 l.f. 25 162,500
Siphons 4 50,000 200,000
Iai.ft Stations 2 140,000 280,000
Subtotal $1,787,500
Contingencies @ 15~ 268,500
Total Trunk Sewer $2,056,000
Main STP F~pansion (including 15g Contingency) 949,000
Total -College View MUD Share $3,005,000
B. City of La Porte Share
Total Probable Construction Cost $7,721,000
Total - College View MUD Share 3,005,000
Total - City of La Porte Share $4,716,000
C. S~unaxy
College View MUD Share = $3,005,000 = 38.9
City of La Porte Share = $4,716,000 = 61.1
~,
•
•
.~
•
•
Attachment "C"
Brealcdawn of F~^~gineering Tasks
•
1. Special Studies and Reports Phase
a. Study of ultimate abandoa~ment of College View wastewater plant
b. Study of solids handling at College View wastewater plant
c. Preparaticm of ca~liance schedule for College View NIUD waste-
water treatment plant
d. Preparation of applications for amendments to existing TDWR and
NPDES (EPA) permits of main wastewater treatment facility in
ccmjunctiari with proposed expansion
e. Preparatiari of Engineering Reports.
2. Preliminary Design Phase
a. Preliminary design of main wastewater treatment facility
b. Preliminary design of relief trunk sewer
c. Preliminary design of College View NAJD ultimate lift station
d. Preparatiari of Preliminary Design Reports
•
•
3. Final Design Phase
a. Preparation of constructicm contract for main wastewater treatment
faciLi_ty expansion
b. Preparation of construction ccmtract for relief trunk sewer and
ultimate College View Lift Station
c. Design Surveys (Special Services)
d. Geotechnical work (Special Services)
e. Submission of design to regulatory agencies for approval
f. Furnish Plans and Specificatioa~s for bidding purposes.
4. Ccrcistruction Phase
a. Assist with Advertisement for bids
b. ReccQm~end award of contract
c. Assist with preparation of formal cca~tract doc~rents
d. Perform Basic Services construction phase tasks
e. Provide Resident Project Representatives as authorized
f. Conduct final inspecticm
g. Reca~end final acceptance of constructed projects (s) .
(Special Services)
',
.~
. • •
• .
~lttacl~mnent "D"
Analysis of Basic Services ~hgineering Fees
-~
Based on Fee Curves
• 1. Sanitary Sewer Constructics~ Cost
Percent of Ccnstruction Cost frcan Curve B = $4,311,000
= 5.3$
Fee = $4,311,000 x 0.053 = $228,500
2. Main STP Co~nstructicn Cost ='$3,365,000
Percent of Constructiari Cost from Curve A = 6.5~
Additional Cot~ensation for Modifications = 33~
New Constructioaz = $2,165,000
Modifications = $1,200,000
Fee - New Ccrostruction = $2,165,000 x 0.065 = $140,700
- Modifications = $1,200,000 x 0.065 x 1.33 = 103,800
- Total $244,500
3. Special Studies and Reports Phase Fee _ $ 12,000
4. Suncnary - Basic Services Fees
Sanitary Bawler $228,500
Main STP 244,500
Special Studies and Reports Phase 12,000
Total $485,000
•
•
~.
~ •
•
RESUMES
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
H. Cecil Allen, P.E.
Neil E. Bishop, Ph.D., P.E.
• Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Peter J. Goldsmith, P.E.
James W. Johnson, F.E.
George O. Puig, P.E.
Edward A. Cain, P.E.
William L. Pearson, P.E.
John F. Wells, P.E.
Bradley H. Winkler, P.E.
n
U
•
Attactmuent "E"
~ i~
•
•
~r •
~w_~ .
~-~
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
Senior Vice President
and Chief Engineer
Principal in Charge
Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,
1952, Bachelor of Arts, 1951, Rice University
•
Registration Professional Engineer: Texas, Colorado,
Louisiana, New Mexico
Professional American Consulting Engineers Council
Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers
Houston Engineering and Scientific Society
National Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1966-present, Senior Vice President and Chief
Engineer.
Serves as director and treasurer of the corpora-
tion and is experienced in design and related
management and supervision for the firm's muni-
cipal engineering.
•
Responsible for the operation and management of
the .firm's public works, water supply engineer-
ing, planning and engineering studies, plant
services, industrial activities, computerized
systems engineering, acoustical engineering,
and land-use planning.
Directed the engineering, planning, and designs
of water and wastewater projects including the
following.
City of Houston Southeast Water Purification
Plant.
City of Houston Municipal Water System.
Bell County WCID No. 1°Surface Water Treatment•
Plant.
•
Bell County WCID No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Collection
and Treatment System.
Texas A&M Wastewater Collection and Treatment
System.
TurnerCollie c~Braden Inc.
~ ~~
•
•
Cecil Allen, P.E.
Project Director
•
Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1963,
Texas A&M University
Registration Professional Engineer: Texas, 1967
Public Surveyor: Texas, 1980
Professional American Society of Civil Engineers
Affiliations American Water Resources Association
Association of Consulting Municipal Engineers
Consulting Engineers Council
Houston Engineering and Scientific Society
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1963-present, Project Director.
Responsible for a project unit that provides plant
engineering services such as preparation of plans
and specifications for water treatment plants,
sewage treatment plants, water supply and distribu-~
tion pumpiny facilities, wastewater lift stations,
and related facilities.
•
Extensively experienced in serving municipal
clients through design, analysis, and planning of
water and wastewater systems. Design expertise
focuses on water distribution systems, water
supply systems, sanitary sewage collection sys-
tems, and sanitary sewage treatment facilities.
Noteworthy projects reflecting experience include
the following.
Design of wastewater treatment plant enlargements
for Clear Lake City, Baytown, Bay City, and Eagle
Pass. These enlargements were for existing
plants and ranged in size from 1.5 mgd to 4.5
mgd.
Design of first enlargement of City of Houston
West District Sewage Treatment Plant from 2.U mgd
to 6.0 mgd.
Design of Phase I of the City of Houston South-
• east Water Purification Plant. This phase is
to be a 160-mgd increment of an ultimate 720-mgd
facility.
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
~ /~
• '[ •
C
Cecil Allen, P.E.
Page Two
Experience Design of 3.0-mgd wastewater plant to serve King-
wood Development. Plant was designed to provide
tertiary treatment and to be expanded to 9.0 mgd.
• Desiyn of waterlines, wastewater lines, storm
sewers, paving, and elevated tanks for portion
of Kingwood Development (18,000 acre).
•
s
•
TurnerCollie(cSBraden inc
~ l3
•
Neil E. Bishop, Ph.D., P.E.
Project Director
•
Education Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering, 1975,
Master of Science in Environmental Health
Engineering, 1968,
• The University of Texas at Austin,
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1966,
Arlington State College
Registration Professional Engineer: Texas, 1976
Professional American Society of Civil Engineers
Affiliations American Water Works Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Air Pollution Control Association
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1970-present, Project Director.
Directs the firm's practice in engineering investi-
gations and planning studies in environmental engi-
neering and science, solid waste, water resources,
air pollution, and wastewater. Actively partici-
pates in public hearinns, and is responsible for
all projects entailing hydrologic investigations.
Extensively experienced in conducting planning and
• engineering studies related to wastewater convey-
ance and treatment. Direct expertise focuses on
laboratory treatability studies, operational
troubleshooting, wastewater characterization stud-
ies, and permitting activities.
Completed area-wide (201) Facility Plans for sev-
eral governmental entities including the City of
Houston, the City of Orange, Clear Lake City Water
Authority, Bell County WCID No. 1, and the City of
Galveston. Studies included Sewer System Analysis,
Sewer System Evaluation Studies, and Environmental
Information Documents.
•
TurnerCollie c~SBradenlnc '/
~ /5~
•
CJ
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Project Manager
..
1 •
Education Master of Engineering
Engineering, 1977.
Bachelor of Science in
Engineering, 1975.
Rensselaer Polytechnic
Registration Professional Engineer:
Florida, 1980
in Environmental
Environmental
Institute
Texas, .1981;
Professional Texas Water Pollution Control Association
Affiliations Water Pollution Control Federation
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
' National Society of Professional Engineers
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1980-present, Manager.
Responsibilities include project management,
supervision and coordination of engineering
desiyn groups, water and wastewater treatment
facility design, preparation of plans and speci-
fications, report writing, preparation of permit
applications, project planning and scheduling,
construction management.
C~
The following is a list of representative
projects.
City of La Porte Main Sewage Treatment Plant
Improvements. Analysis of plant operational
problems, evaluation of plant equipment and
design, recommendation of improvements includ-
ing new sludge pumping system, modification of
lift station controls, and control building
ventilation.
City of Alice Northeast Sewage Treatment Plant.
New 2.02-mgd oxidation ditch treatment plant and
a new 1.8-mgd lift station.
City of Alice Southside Sewage Treatment Plant.
Expansion of an existing facility from 2.0 mgd
to 2.7 mgd.
•
TurnerCollie~Bracien Inc. ~
.E /s
•
•
Robert C. Reach, P.E.
Page Two
Experience Kingwood Place Wastewater Treatment Plant,
Kingwood, Texas. New facility with initial
capacity of 0.75 mgd, ultimate capacity of
3.0 mgd.
Beltway Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase III
Expansion, Houston, Texas. Expansion of the plant
from 4.4-mgd capacity to 13.34-mgd capacity.
Responsible for preparation of final plans, speci-
fications, and contract documents.
Port Acres Wastewater Treatment Plant, Port
Arthur, Texas. Expansion of the plant from
0.4-mgd capacity to 1.9-mgd capacity.
Main Outfall Lift Station, Port Arthur, Texas.
Design of a major sewage lift station with
38.5-mgd capacity.
Gee & Jenson, Inc., West Palm Beach, Florida;
1976-1980, Project Engineer.
Representative projects include the following.
Acme Improvement District Wastewater Treatment
Plant, Wellington, Florida. Design of a 1.5-mgd-
capacity oxidation ditch-type treatment facility.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation,
• Deerfield Beach, Florida. Design of modifica-
tions and upgrading of a 4.0-mgd-capacity
contact-stabilization plant.
Wastewater Collection System Expansion, Deerfield
Beach, Florida. Design of 10 pump stations and
approximately 40 miles of gravity and pressure
pipelines to serve developed areas of the city.
u
TurnerCollie c~Braden Inc
l~
•
•
Peter Goldsmith, P.E.
Project Engineer
•
Education Master of Science in water Resources Technology,
1977, The University of Birmingham, England
Diploma (First Class) Constructional Engineering,
1970, Twickenham College of Technology, England
Registration Chartered Civil Engineer: United Kingdom
Professional Engineer: Texas
Licensed Irrigator: Texas
Professional Institution of Civil Engineers, United Kingdom
Affiliation
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1979-present, Project Engineer.
Project Manager for infrastructure design for
Aramco communities at Abqaiq and Udhailiyah,
Saudi Arabia. This project involved the design
of all utility systems, roads, drainage, land-
scaping, and irrigation.
Supervised a project team designing wastewater
collection facilities for the Jubail Industrial
Community being developed on the Arabian Gulf in
Saudi Arabia. Project included eight major pump-
iny stations and associated pipelines.
•
Project Engineer for the complete preliminary engi-
neering design of the Beltway Sewage Treatment
Plant extension, Houston.
Designed the drainage pumping station for Terminal
"D" at Houston Intercontinental Airport. This was
a 60.5 mgd station handYing stormwater from the
road network and areas around the terminal.
D. Balfour & Sons, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates;
1977-1979, Resident Engineer.
Directed a team of engineers and technicians in
the supervision of construction of the sewage
collection and disposal system, including sewers,
pumping stations, and treatment works for a
population of 120,000 persons.
TurnerCollie~Braden Inc.
~~
•
George O. Puig, P.E.
Project Engineer
~~
-- ~__
Education Bachelor of Science in Architectural
Engineering, 1968, University of Kansas
Registration Professional Engineer: Texas
Professional American Concrete Institute
Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1969-present, Manager, Construction
Administration.
Responsible for coordination of engineering
services on projects which include water and
sewage treatment plants, and water control
structures. Work includes preliminary reports,
preparation of plans and specifications, con-
struction administration, and the use of
computer-aided design and drafting techniques.
Representative projects include the following.
•
City of Houston East Water Purification Plant.
Consists of several projects including a separate
facility to treat 50 mgd of potable water, and
enlarging of the existing facility from 80 mgd to
125 mgd capacity; sludge processing facilities;
a flood protection system, and several steel
ground storage tanks.
A 25 mgd addition
Bell County WC&ID
transmission line
facilities. Also
existing sewage t:
mgd capacity.
to an existing water plant for
No. 1 including a 17 mile-long
and prestressed ground storage
included an expansion of an
reatment plant from 9 mgd to 15
City of Houston Southeast Water Purification
Plant. A new 16U mgd water purification plant
with an ultimate capacity of 750 mgd.
•
Sewage treatment facilities for Clear Lake City,
Kingwood, Texas A&M Univeristy, and many smaller
installations.
Finney and Turnipseed, Topeka, Kansas; 1967-1969,
Designer.
TurnerCollie c~SBracien Inc.
~' ,~
•
n
U
CJ
James W. Johnson, Jr., P.E.
Project Engineer
e •
Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1973,
Clemson University
Registration Professional Engineer: Texas, 1981;
Virginia, 1977
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1978-present, Project Engineer.
Noteworthy projects include the following:
City of Alice, Texas and Alice Water Authority,
Raw Water Transmission Pipeline. Mechanical and
civil design of 20.5-mile 30-inch steel cylinder
reinforced concrete pipeline to include the addi-
tion of a 400-Hp raw water pump to an existing
pump station, metering facilities, pipeline surge
analysis, air release valve locations, and pipe
bend thrust restraints.
L~
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Tanajib Community Update.
Analyzed projected population density and associ-
ated water and wastewater demands and recommended
improvements to the utility system to include pot-
able water distribution system line sizes, distri-
bution pumpage and storage, water treatment plant
capacity, wastewater treatment plant and lift
station capacities, and wastewater gravity sewer
collection system line sizes.
HCUD No. 5 (Kingwood). Offsite 1,500-gpm water
well including well and well pump design, piping,
and control building.
Copperfield Sewage Treatment Plant, Harris County,
Texas. Structural design of reinforced concrete
structures, steel frame building, and lift station
steel hoist frame.
Velsicol Chemical Corporation, Beaumont, Texas;
1977-1y78, Civil/Structural Design Engineer.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 1973-1977,
Battalion Construction Officer.
•
TurnerCollie c~Braden Inc
E ~~
~J
C~
~i
Edward A. Cain, P.E.
Electrical Engineer
Education Bachelor of Science in Physics, 1966,
Texas A&I University
• Registration Professional Engineer: Texas, Ohio
Professional Illuminating Engineering Society
Affiliations National Society of Professional Engineers
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1977-present, Manager - Electrical Design.
Provided supervision for all electrical engineering
for a 50-million-gallon-per-day expansion to the
City of Houston East Plant; the 34.75-mgd expansion
to the Bell County Water Control and Improvement
District No. 1 Water Treatment Plant; the Houston
Northeast Water Purification Plant which includes
a 60,000 KVA substation at 138 KV, and the Houston
Southeast Water Purification Plant which includes
cost-effective evaluation of electrical systems
and equipment.
Directed the design of a 34.5 KV site power distri-
bution system for NL Petroleum Services; the
electrical design for complete water supply system
and wastewater system for the City of Jubail,
• Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; water pumping station for
the City of Dallas.
Served as manager for design of medium- and low-
voltage power systems for water and wastewater
plants for numerous clients.
3D/International, Houston, Texas; 1976-1977,
Senior Associate.
Jochen & Henderson Inc., Houston, Texas; 1968-1976,
Project Manager.
Houston Lighting & Power Company, Houston, Texas;
1966-1967, Illuminating Engineer.
•
TurnerCollie c~Braden Inc
~,; ~o
•
•
William L. Pearson, P.E.
Mechanical Engineer
•
Education Bachelor of Science in Mechanical
Engineering, 1952, Texas A&M University
• Registration Professional Engineer: Texas
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1974-present, Senior Engineer.
Engineering design and management responsibili-
ties for a broad range of projects including
design of booster pump stations, wastewater
and water treatment plants, and municipal water
and wastewater systems.
Responsible for engineering design of a refinery
wastewater treatment plant involving oily water
separation and dissolved air flotation treatment,
an industrial waste treatment plant, industrial
stormwater pumping stations, sludge pumping and
pipeline facilities, industrial surface water
facilities, and condensate recovery and treatment
equipment.
Representative projects are as follows:
AMOCO Texas Refining Company project entailed
responsibility for design of a gravity thickener,
• sludge pumping facilities, and 1,800 feet of
sludge pipeline to return supernatant.
EXXON Company U.S.A. Baytown Refinery project
entailed handling of degrading and sludge removal
for a 30-million-gallon-per-day wastewater stream
and gravity oil separator.
Argo International Corp., Houston, Texas; 1966-
19%4, Regional Office Manager.
General Electric Com any, Chicago, Illinois;
195'1-1966, Application, Requisition, and Service
Engineer.
~J
TurnerCollie c~Braden Inc
E ~~
u
•
•
John Wells, P.E.
Senior Mechanical Engineer
•
Education Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering,
1965, Lehigh University
Registration Professional Engineer: Texas, New York
Professional American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Affiliations Society of American Value Engineers
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1978-present, Senior Mechanical Engineer.
Responsible for both process and mechanical designs
in the municipal and industrial areas.
Experienced in municipal and industrial water and
wastewater treatment. Water and wastewater experi-
ence includes preliminary design of wastewater and
combined sewer overflow treatment facilities,
comprehensive water supply planning, water rate
studies, municipal wastewater pilot plant programs,
and municipal water treatment studies.
Noteworthy projects include the following:
C~
~J
Final plans and specifications for mechanical/
civil portions of an 80-mgd raw water pump station
for the City of Houston, Texas.
Final plans and specifications for mechanical/
civil portions of 14-mgd expansions to Bellaire
Brays distribution pump station.
Final plans and specifications for mechanical
portion of 28-mgd expansion to Katy Addicks distri-
bution pump station.
Preliminary design of 5-myd sewage treatment plant
for the Town of Colonie, New York.
TurnerCoilie~Braden Inc
~ ~ 02
•
•
•
Bradley H. Winkler, P.E.
Engineer
~_
Education Master of Environmental Engineering, 1978,
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1978,
Rice University
Registration Professional Engineer: Texas, 1982
Experience Turner Collie & Braden Inc., Houston, Texas;
1977-present, Engineer.
Experienced in mechanical, process, and chemical
system design for wastewater and water treatment
plants. Prepared planning studies and engineering
reports for municipal and private clients. Devel-
oped bench-scale process testing programs for
water and wastewater treatment. Wrote operation
and maintenance manuals, and participated in on-
site start-up activities for wastewater treatment
plants.
Noteworthy projects include the following.
U
Bell County WCID No. 1 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Originated and supervised bench-scale tests for
confirmation of design parameters. Wrote opera-
tion and maintenance manual for this advanced
15-mgd wastewater treatment plant. Provided on-
site start-up assistance and operator training.
Harris County Utility District No. 5, Kingwood
Central Sewage Treatment Plant. Performed mechani-
cal, process, instrumentation, and civil design
for a 1.75-mgd expansion of this advanced waste-
water treatment plant.
Trinity Bay Conservation District. Facility
planning for installation of sewage collection
system serving a sparsely populated rural area.
•
City of Brenham Wastewater Treatment Plant
Evaluation. Plant-wide evaluation emphasizing
recommendations to upgrade process performance.
City of Houston, First Quadrennial Report on the
Physical Condition and Adequacy of Houston's
Sanitary Sewer System. Inspected 18 of the City's
sewage treatment plants.
TurnerCoilie c~Braden Inc
~ ~3
t f •
u
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
•
MADE AND ENTERED INTO by and between the City of La Porte, Texas,
hereinafter called the "City," and Turner Collie & Braden Inc.,
hereinafter called the "Engineer."
RECITALS
The City intends to plan, design, and construct a relief sanitary
sewer from the western area of the' City along Fairmont Parkway to the
existing City of La Porte Wastewater Treatment Facility. The City
also intends to plan, design, and construct improvements to the
• existing City wastewater treatment facility and to the existing
College View MUD wastewater treatment facility and lift station.
Such improvements to the above described sanitary sewer system and
wastewater treatment facilities are hereinafter referred to as the
"Project."
CONTRACTUAL UNDERTAKINGS
SECTION I
EMPLOYMENT OF ENGINEER
The City agrees to employ the Engineer and the Engineer agrees
to perform professional engineering services in connection with the
Project as stated in the Sections to follow and as is described
in further detail on the attached Exhibit A entitled "Scope of
• Services," and for having rendered such services, the City agrees
to pay to the Engineer compensation as stated in the Sections to
follow. The Enyineer intends to make available the services of
the personnel shown on the attached Exhibit B entitled "Organiza-
tion Chart" through the duration of the project.
•
-i-
~. ~
r • ~ •
•
SECTION II
CHARACTER AND EXTENT OF SERVICES
The Engineer shall render the following professional services
necessary for the development of the Project:
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase - Basic Services
1. Prepare engineering report setting forth recommenda-
tions for the following items. Furnish City with
15 copies of report.
a. Develop plan for ultimate abandonment of existing
College View MUD wastewater treatment facility.
b. Develop plan for interim solids handling (sludge)
at existing College View MUD wastewater treatment
• facility.
2. Prepare compliance schedule for College View MUD
wastewater treatment facility.
3. Prepare applications for amendments to existing TDWR
and NPDES (EPA) permits in conjunction with the pro-
posed expansion of the City's wastewater treatment
facility.
B. Preliminary Design Phase - Basic Services
1. Attend preliminary conference with the City regarding
the Project.
2. Perform preliminary engineering services in connection
with Project in sufficient detail to clearly
the problems involved and the alternate solutions
• available to the City, to include preliminary layouts,
sketches, and estimates of probable cost for the
Project, and to set forth clearly the Engineer's
recommendations. Prepare preliminary engineering
reports specifically for the following items.
a. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer. Develop
trunk sewer sizes, alignment, and connections to
existing system(s) from the existing College View
•
-2-
~ ~S
• •
•
Municipal Utility District (MUD) wastewater treat-
ment facility lift station to the City's waste-
water treatment facility. The relief sanitary
sewer in conjunction with the existing Fairmont
Parkway trunk sewer is to convey year 2003 flows
to the City's main wastewater treatment facility.
b. Expansion of the City's main wastewater treatment
facility from an average capacity of 2.5 million
gallons per day (mgd) and a maximum wet weather
capacity of 6.25 mgd to an average capacity of
4.0 mgd and a maximum wet weather capacity of
16.0 mgd.
• c. Expansion of College View MUD Lift station to
convey flows from the abandoned College View MUD
wastewater treatment facility and its service
area to the proposed relief sanitary sewer on
Fairmont Parkway.
3. Furnish the City 15 copies of the preliminary design
report(s), including preliminary layouts, sketches,
and cost estimates.
C. Final Design~Phase - Basic Services
1. Establish the scope and advise the City of any soil
and foundation investigations or any design surveys
or special testing which, in the opinion of the Engi-
neer, may be required for the proper execution of the .,
• Project; and arrange with the City for the conduct of
such investigations, surveys, and tests. (The perform-
mance of these investigations and tests is not a part
of the Engineer's basic services, and compensation
therefor is not included in the Basic Charge; it may
be performed by the Engineer, by agreement with the
City, in which case compensation shall be determined
by the applicable portions of Section VI.)
•
-3-
E 36
~,
•
•
.7
2. Furnish to the City, where required by the circum-
stances of the assignment, the engineering data
necessary for applications for routine permits by
local and state authorities (as distinguished from
detailed applications and supporting documents for
government grants-in-aid, or to meet the requirements
of special programs of the federal government other
than those specified in Section II, Paragraph A.3.
above).
3. Upon written authorization of the City, prepare
detailed specifications and contract drawings of
facilities listed in Section II, Paragraph B.2.
• These designs shall be submitted to the applicable
state and federal agencies for approval.
4. Prepare detailed estimates of probable costs and
proposals of authorized construction, which shall
include summaries of bid items and quantities which
will be based, wherever practical, on the unit price
system of bidding. The Engineer shall not be
required to guarantee the accuracy of these estimates.
5. Furnish to the City 50 copies of approved plans,
specifications, notices to bidders, and proposals for
each construction contract. All copies in excess of
50 shall be paid for separately as specified in
Section VI.
• D. Construction Phase - Basic Services
1. Assist the City in the advertisement of the Project
for bids.
2. Assist the City in the opening and tabulation of
bids for construction of the Project, and recommend
to the City as to the proper action on all proposals
received.
-4-
~~
•
•
•
3. Assist in the preparation of formal Contract Docu-
ments for the contracts.
4. Provide the services of a Registered Professional
Engineer experienced in each aspect of plant design
and construction to make visits to the site at least
once every two weeks during construction and at all
critical points of construction (as distinguished
from the continuous services of a resident Project
Representative described in paragraph E.11. below).
The Engineer is to observe the progress and quality
of the executed work and to determine in general if
the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract
• Documents. In performing this service, the Engineer
will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous
on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity
of the work or material; he will not be responsible
for the techniques and sequences of construction or
the safety precautions incident thereto, and he will
not be responsible or liable in any degree for the
contractors' failure to perform the construction
work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
During visits to the construction site, and on the
basis of the Engineer's on-site observations, he
will keep the City informed in writing of the extent
of the progress of the work, and advise the City of ..
• material and substantial defects and deficiencies in
the work of contractors which are discovered by the
Engineer or otherwise brought to the Engineer's atten-
tion in the course of construction.
5. Consult and advise with the City; issue all instruc-
tions to the contractor requested by the City; and
prepare routine change orders as required.
•
-5-
~~
~, •
•
•
6. Check and review samples, catalog data, schedules,
shop drawings, laboratory, shop and mill tests of
materials and equipment and other data which the con-
tractor is required to submit, only for conformance
with the design concept of the Project and compliance
with the information given by the Contract Documents;
and assemble written guarantees which are required by
the Contract Documents.
7. Prepare monthly and final estimates for payments to
contractors, and furnish to the City any necessary
certifications as to payments to contractors and
suppliers.
• 8. Conduct, in company with the City, a final inspection
of the Project for conformance with the design concept
of the Project and compliance with the Contract Docu-
ments, and recommend in writing final payment to the
contractors.
9. Revise contract drawings, with the assistance of the
Contractor, to provide record drawings of the completed
Project. The Engineer will use his best efforts and
will exercise the usual degree of care in preparing
these drawings; he shall not be required to guarantee
the accuracy of the record drawings. Furnish a set of
reproducibles of these record drawings to the City.
E. Special Services .,
• If authorized in writing by City, Engineer shall furnish
or obtain from others Special Services of the following types
which are not considered normal or customary Basic Services
except to the extent provided otherwise in scope of work; these
will be paid for by City as indicated in Section VI.
1. By subcontract or otherwise, perform field surveys,
title searches, plats, mete's and bounds descriptions,
•
-6-
~ °Z ~
:~ f • ~ •
n
U
and office computations and drafting related to the
tasks.
2. Travel expenses when authorized by the City to points
other than the Engineer's office, City offices, or the
Project Area.
3. By subcontract or otherwise, perform soil consulta-
tions and/or test borings, and acquire other similar
information, investigations, and analyses.
4. Prepare special reports or studies required by
the City not covered under Aasic Services.
5. Preparation of environmental statements and assistance
to City in preparing for and attending public
• hearings. Appearances before regulatory agencies.
6. Assist the City as an expert witness or otherwise in
connection with any litigation with third parties or
administrative proceedings arising in relation to the
Project, provided such litigation was not caused by
the failure of the Engineer to perform in the first
instance.
7. After the final plans and specifications have been
approved by the City, evaluate items submitted by the
City to the Engineer for evaluation pursuant to the
Substitution Clause of a construction contract,
evaluate proposals for. change orders, prepare change
orders, or revise plans and specifications, provided
• that these services (a) are not made necessary by a
failure of the Engineer to perform in the firs t
instance and (b) take more than eight (8) hours of
services by the Engineer's employees to complete per
item.
8. Perform services related to a readvertisement for bids
(not caused by the Engineer's failure to perform in
the first instance).
•
-7-
~~
,,
•
•
•
9. Services resulting from significant changes in extent
of the Project or its design including, but not
limited to, changes in size, complexity, City's
schedule, or character of construction or method of
financing; and revising previously accepted studies,
reports, design documents, or Contract Documents when
such revisions are due to causes beyond Engineer's
control.
10. Additional or extended services during construction
made necessary by (a) work damaged by fire or other
cause during construction, (b) a significant amount
of defective or neglected work of Contractor(s),
• (c) prolongation of the contract time of any prime
contract by more than 120 days, or (d) default by
Contractor(s), all through no fault of Engineer.
11. Provide one or more experienced and qualified Resident
Project Representatives, as approved by the City
Manager, one of whom shall be designated by the
Engineer as the Chief Representative. The Resident
Project Representative shall provide continuous,
on-the-site observation of the construction work,
including the material furnished and the workmanship
provided. The Chief Representative shall make a
daily written report to the City with respect to the
material furnished, the workmanship provided, and ..
the progress of the work, all in relationship to the
construction contract documents, provided, however,
the Resident Project Representatives need not be
registered professional engineers, and provided
further, that unless the circumstances otherwise
warrant, the Resident Project Representatives shall
not be required to make exh°austive on-the-site
• inspections to check the quality or quantity of the
-8-
~ ~~~
~.. •
•
•
maps, field notes, statistics, computations, and other data in
his possession relative to existing facilities and to the Project.
SECTION VI
THE ENGINEER'S COMPENSATION
The City shall compensate the Engineer for Basic Services
performed under this Agreement on a "Lump Sum" basis of compensation.
Such compensation shall be as outlined below for each phase of the
Project. Special Services provided by the Engineer shall be compen-
sated as hereinafter provided for in this Section.
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $12,000 (Twelve Thousand Dollars)
shall be full compensation for the Basic Services Fee for
• this phase of the Project. Partial payments for services in
the Special Studies and Reports Phase shall be made monthly.
Payments will be made in proportion to that part of the ser-
vices which has been completed, as evidenced by monthly
statements submitted by the Engineer to the City. Final
payment for services in the Special Studies and Report Phase
shall be due upon completion of these services.
B. Preliminary Design Phase - Basic Services
The lump sum amount of $58,000 (Fifty-Eight Thousand
Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic Services
Fee for this phase of the Project. Partial payments for
services in the Preliminary Design Phase shall be made
monthly. Payments will be made in proportion to that part
• of the services in the Preliminary Design Phase which has
been accomplished, as evidenced by monthly statements
submitted by the Engineer to the City. Final payment for
services in the Preliminary Design Phase shall be payable
upon submission to the City of the required report(s),
sketches, and estimates, and upon the City's acceptance
of these submittals, which shall be within 30. days after
• submission.
-10-
~ 3~
f• ' •
•
•
work or material and shall not be required to check
the techniques and sequences of construction or the
safety precautions incident thereto.
SECTION III
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
No professional services of any nature shall be undertaken by
the Engineer under this Agreement until he has received written
authorization from the City. Each Phase of Basic Services and each
item of Special Services shall be authorized by separate letters of
authorization signed by the City Manager.
SECTION IV
PERIOD OF SERVICE
• The Engineer agrees to perform services diligently and to com-
plete services under Section II A. within forty-five (45) calendar
days after execution of Agreement and under Sections II B. and
II C. (1) Fairmont Parkway Relief Sewer within one hundred eighty
(180) calendar days after execution of Agreement and (2) existing
City wastewater treatment facility expansion within two hundred
forty (240) calendar days after execution of Agreement. This
Ayreement shall be effective upon execution by the City and the
Engineer and shall remain in force until final payment for services
called for under Section II.D.9. has been made or until terminated
under the provisions hereinafter provided in Section VIII.
SECTION V
COORDINATION WITH THE OWNER
• The Engineer shall hold periodic conferences with the City
Manager and/or his designated representatives to the end that
the Project, as perfected, shall have full benefit of the City's
experience and knowledge of existing needs--and facilities and be
consistent with its current policies and construction standards.
To implement this coordination, the City shall make available to
the Engineer, for use in planning the Project, all existing plans,
C~
-9-
~ 33
•
C. Final Design Phase - Basic Services
•
The lump sum amount of $252,000 (Two Hundred Fifty-Two
Thousand Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic
Services Fee for this phase of the Project. Partial payments
for services in the Final Design Phase shall be made monthly.
Payments will be made in proportion to that part of the ser-
vices in the Final Design Phase which has been accomplished,
as evidenced by monthly statements submitted by the Engineer
to the City. Final payment for services authorized in the
Final Design Phase shall be due upon the completion of these
services.
D. Construction Phase - Basic Services
• The lump sum amount of $78,000 (Seventy-Eight Thousand
Dollars) shall be full compensation for the Basic Services
Fee for this phase of the Project. This sum will be paid in
monthly installments in proportion to the construction work
completed, on the basis of the Engineer's estimates prepared
for monthly payments to contractors. Upon completion of all
work authorized in the Construction Phase, the Engineer will
be paid the remainder of the charge for this Phase.
E. Special Services Not Included in Above Lump Sum Charges
The charges above described in the Special Studies and
Reports, Preliminary Design, Final Design, and Construction
phases shall provide compensation to the Engineer for all
services called for under this Agreement to be performed by
• him, or under his direction, except the services set forth
below. These excluded Special Services, and the compensation
to be paid by the City to the Engineer for their performance,
as required, are as follows:
Service
Basis of Compensation
1. Field surveys to collect Salary cost times a multi-
information required for plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
design. ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
• expense at invoice cost.
-11-
~ 3~
•
U
•
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Special investigative
assignments.
Preparation of environ-
mental statements and
assistance to City in
preparing for and
attending public
hearings.
Services of a resident
Project Representative,
and other field person-
nel as required, for
on-the-site observation
and for construction
layout surveys.
Soil and foundation
investigations, includ-
ing test borings, soil
tests, and analyses~of
test results.
Land surveys and estab-
lishment of boundaries
and monuments.
Preparation of property
or easement descriptions.
Preparation of any
special reports required
for marketing of bonds.
Appearances before
regulatory agencies.
Assistance to the City
as an expert witness in
any litigations with
third parties, arising
from the development or
construction of Project.
Travel expenses to points
other than Engineer's
office, City offices, or
Project Area (except item
E.4 above).
-12-
~ 35
•
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
Project Representative
travel cost between
Engineer's office.and
Project area at 35 cents
per mile.
Actual subcontract cost
and other direct non-
labor expense at invoice
cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.00. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense and subcontract
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse-
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
Salary cost times a multi-
plier of 2.25. Reimburse -
ment for direct nonlabor
expense at invoice cost.
$375 per diem for each
day, or part thereof, in
which Engineer's presence
is required by City.
Actual invoice cost.
Travel by vehicles owned
or leased by the Engineer
shall be at 35 cents per
mile.
• ~.
•
•
•
s
12. Additional copies of
reports and specifica-
tions and additional
blueprint copies of
drawings over the number
of copies specified under
Basic Services.
Reimbursement for direct
nonlabor expense and sub-
contract expense at invoice
cost.
Payments to the Engineer for authorized Special Services shall
be made monthly, by the City, upon presentation of monthly state-
ments by the Engineer of such services. "Salary Cost" is defined
as the cost of salaries (total hours worked times the employee's
rate of pay on an hourly basis) of the Engineer's employees for
time directly chargeable to the Project, plus 27 percent for social
security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes,
employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, incentive
pay, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and
holiday pay applicable thereto. The "Salary Cost" for the services
of the Engineer's officers shall be at their regular "Salary Cost,"
as defined above, not to exceed $40.00 per hour. In addition, an
overtime premium for draftsmen and technician classifications will
be charged for which the Engineer's technical staff works in excess
of 40 hours. The overtime premium shall be one-'r-alf the employee's
Salary Cost times 2.25. The overtime premium will be charged only
because of the City's requirements and upon its specific
authorization.
The maximum amount payable for Basic Services under this
Agreement is $400,000 (Four Hundred Thousand Dollars). This maximum
amount payable may be revised in the event of changes in extent,
complexity, or character of work as authorized in writing by the
City. The maximum amount payable for Special Services shall~be
authorized in writing by the City for each individual assignment.
No Special Services shall be provided in excess of the amount
authorized.
Payments to the Engineer for authorized services will be made
monthly by the City upon presentation of monthly statements by the
Engineer of such services. Monthly statements will include detailed
-13-
~ 36
• •
u
backup information requested by City. Payments shall be due upon
receipt by the City of any such statement. All remittances shall be
mailed or delivered to Engineer's office in Houston, Harris County,
Texas.
If City fails to make any payment due Engineer for services
and expenses within sixty days after receipt of Engineer's bill
therefor, the amounts due Engineer shall include a charge at the
rate of X12 percent per annum from said sixtieth day, and in addi-
tion, Engineer may, after giving seven days written notice to
Owner, suspend services under this Agreement until he has been
paid in full all amounts due him from services and expenses.
SECTION VII
• OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Original documents, plans, designs, and survey notes developed
in connection with services performed hereunder belony to, and
remain the property of the City, in consideration of which it is
mutually agreed that the City will use them solely in connection
with the Project, save with the express consent of the Engineer.
The Engineer may retain reproducible copies of such documents.
SECTION VIII
TERMINATION
Either party to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement by
giving to the other 30 days' notice in writing. Upon delivery of
such notice by the City to the Engineer, and upon expiration of
the 30-day period, the Engineer shall discontinue all services in
• connection with the performance of this Agreement and shall proceed
to cancel promptly all existing orders and contracts insofar~as
such orders or contracts are chargeable to this Agreement. As
soon as practicable after receipt of notice of termination, the
Engineer shall submit a statement, showing in detail the services
performed under this Agreement to the date of termination. The
City shall then pay the Engineer promptly that proportion of the
•
-14-
~ 3T
• •
•
prescribed charges which the services called for under this Agree-
ment, less such payments on account of the charyes as have been
previously made. Copies of all completed or partially completed
designs, plans, and specifications prepared under this Agreement
shall be delivered to the City when and if this Agreement is termi-
nated, but subject to the restrictions, as to their use, as set
forth in Section VII.
SECTIUN IX
ADDRESS OF NOTICES AND CUMMUNICATIUNS
All notices and communications under this Agreement to be
mailed or delivered to Engineer shall be to the following address:
Turner Collie & Braden Inc.
P.O. Box 13089
• Houston, Texas 77219
Attention: Mr. H. P. McAlister, P.E.
All notices and communications under this Agreement to be
mailed or delivered to the City shall be to the following address:
City of La Porte
P.U. Box 1115
La Porte, Texas 77551
Attention: Mr. Jack Owen
SECTION X
SECTIUN CAPTIONS
Each Section under the contractual undertakings has been
supplied with a caption to serve only as a guide to the contents.
The caption does not control the meaning of any Section or in any
way determine its interpretation or application.
• SECTIUN XI
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS
The City and the Engineer each binds himself and his successors,
executors, administrators, and assigns to the other party of this
Agreement and to the successors, executors-; administrators, and
assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this
Agreement. Except as above, neither the City nor the Engineer
shall assign, sublet, or transfer his interest in this Agreement
• without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be
-15-
~ 38
~ ~.
• ~.
•
•
construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any
officer or agent of any public body which may be a party thereto.
SECTION XII
INSPECTIONS AND AUDIT
The City shall have the right to perform, or cause to be
performed, audits of the books and records of the Engineer and
inspections of all places where work is undertaken in connection
with this Agreement, provided that the Engineer shall not be
required to keep such books and records longer than two (2)
years after the termination of this Agreement.
EXECUTED IN two counterparts (each of which is an original) on
U
•
•
behalf of Engineer by its Senior Vice President shown below, and on
behalf of City by its Mayor (thereunto duly authorized) this
day of , 1984.
TURNER COLLIE & BRADEN INC.
H. P. McAlister, P.E.
Senior Vice President
CITY U~~ LA PURTE
Virginia Cline
Mayor
ATTEST:
L. A. Bouffard
Assistant Secretary
ATTEST:
Title:
-16-
~~
• r
•
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Special Studies and Reports Phase
1. Prepare engineering report for interim operation and ulti-
mate abandonment of existing College View MUD wastewater
treatment facility.
a. Determine requirements for abandonment of existing
facility.
b. Determine the need for demolition of existing facility.
c. Evaluate existing equipment and materials and determine
if there are any sal~~ageable or reusable items.
d. Determine the ultimate use of the site and required
• site improvements.
e. Evaluate sludge handling options for interim operation.
(1) Additional sludge drying beds.
(2) Dewatering with mobile equipment.
(3) Hauling of liquid sludge.
2. Prepare compliance schedule for College View MUD wastewater
treatment facility.
a. Prepare draft schedule detailing interim and final
measures to be taken by the City to reduce and eliminate
noncomplying discharges.
b. Review the draft schedule with the City and the Texas
Department of Water Resources (TDWR) staff.
c. Prepare final compliance schedule.
• 3. Prepare permit applications for amendments to existing TDWR
and NPllES discharge permits.
a. Prepare technical information on proposed plant expan-
sion, including unit capacities, influent and effluent
quality, data on surrounding property owners, and
other required information.
•
A-1
~ ,~v
t • ~ ~~
•
b. Prepare a technical report to support the applications
for amended permits, including appropriate exhibits and
tables.
c. Prepare application forms for execution by the City.
4. Submit compliance schedule to regulatory agencies.
5. Submit permit applications to regulatory agencies.
B. Preliminary Design Phase
1. Fairmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Determine trunk sewer sizes, lengths, slopes, and
depths.
b. Evaluate alternative sewer locations within the
right-of-way.
• c. Investigate and resolve conflicts with existing
pipelines and underground utilities.
J•
k.
2. Mai
• a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
d. Evaluate and make recommendations on alternative
sewer materials.
e. Determine requirements for modifications or abandon-
ment of existing lift stations.
f. Determine details of connections to existing sewers.
g. Evaluate storage capacity of trunk sewers.
h. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
i. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
Present preliminary design recommendations.
Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
.n Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
Prepare preliminary process design calculations.
Determine sizes and capacities of process units.
Prepare preliminary hydraulic profile calculations.
Evaluate alternative treatment equipment.
Review existing plant facilities and determine
capacities of existing equipment and treatment units.
f. Prepare preliminary equipment selections.
A-2
~~
<< ~ , • •
• ~.
g. Prepare preliminary site layout for proposed
improvements.
h. Prepare preliminary layouts for proposed equipment and
treatment units.
(1) Modifications to existing lift station.
(2) New lift station.
(3) Modifications to existing headworks.
(4) New headworks.
(5) Aeration basins.
(6) Final clarifiers.
(7) Aerobic digester.
(8) Return sludge pumping station.
• (9) Chlorine contact basins.
(10) Chlorination facility.
(11) Blowers.
(12) Plant piping.
(13) Electrical improvements.
(14) Instrumentation and control system.
i. Evaluate requirements for future expansion.
j. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
k. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
1. Present preliminary design recommendations.
m. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
3. Col lege View MUD Lift Station
a. Evaluate lift station modifications required to serve
• initial design area.
b. Evaluate lift station modifications required to serve
ultimate design area.
c. Prepare preliminary design recommendations.
d. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable costs.
e. Present preliminary design recommendations.
f. Submit preliminary report to regulatory agencies.
•
A-3
~~
• •
r 1
LJ
C. Final Design Phase
1. Fai rmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
• agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
2. Mai n Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investiyations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
• agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
3. College View MUD Lift Station
a. Establish the scope of required design surveys.
b. Establish the scope of required soils investigations.
c. Prepare final contract drawings.
d. Prepare detailed technical specifications.
e. Prepare bid documents and contract forms.
•
A-4
~-~
r ~ •
~ !1
L J
f. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the City for
approval.
g. Submit contract drawings, detailed technical specifi-
cations, and contract documents to the regulatory
agencies for approval.
h. Prepare final estimates of probable costs.
D. Construction Phase
1. Fai rmont Parkway Relief Sanitary Sewer
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
• c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
2. Mai n Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
• bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
' e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
A-5
~l
~ ~ •
® ~.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
3. Col lege View MUD Lift Station
a. Assist the City in advertisement of the Project for
bids.
b. Assist the City in receiving bids for the Project.
c. Tabulate bids for the Project and make recommendations
for action to the City.
d. Prepare final contract documents for the Project.
• e. Review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor.
f. Prepare monthly payment estimates and progress reports.
g. Make periodic site visits.
h. Issue instructions to the contractor.
i. Prepare routine change orders.
j. Conduct a final inspection of the Project.
k. Prepare recommendations for acceptance of the Project.
1. Prepare record drawings of the completed Project.
•
~J
A-6
r
~- ~J
1 ~ ~r •
•
K'
•
s
r
•
S
U
y
Z z
O W
a W
N o
oc
. ~a
W
F- W
LLJ H
O y
~y
0
d W
F- J Q
m Q W
y
~
W ~~
1
i
V
C
C
ML
W
U
L
C
L..
~- ~~~
•
CITY OF LA PORTE
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
T0: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS ~N' DATE: 6-14-84
FROM: BOB HERRERA, DIRECTOR 0 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SUBJECT: CSI DENTAL PLAN
On June 12, 1984 Bob Lee, representative for Dr. Robert S. Guminey, DDS
gave a presentation on the CSI dental plan.
After discussion with department and division heads, it is our concensus
that this would be a very good plan to offer the City employees.
This would be a strictly voluntary program with payroll deductions set
• up through the Finance division. The employees could then cancel the
program at any time by discontinuing this payroll deduction.
attachments
. ~-
~ AFFORDABLE FAY
(~ ~ DENTAL PROGRAMS
• CSI IS DESIGNED TO ELIMINATE THE MANY FACTORS WHICH ACT AS
FINANCIAL DETERENTS TO DENTAL PATIENTS. OUR GOAL! TO MAKE
DENTISTRY AVAILABLE AT AFFORDABLE FEES.
NO DEDUCTIBLES WITH CSI! Deductibles discourage dental
visits, CSI encourages proper
dental care.
CSI COVERS ORTHODONTICSlSave $1,200-$1,500 on braces!
Both Children and Adults
CSI HAS NO LIFETIME OR ANNUAL MAXIMUM BENEFIT LIMITS!
Maximum limits discourage dental
visits, CSI encourages proper
dental care.
CSI DOES NOT LIMITOR EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS!
CSI covers all areas of dentistry.
NO CLAIM FORMS OR PRE-AUTHORIZATIONS WITH CSI!
No more paper work delay and
hassle.
THE REMARKABLY LOW COST OF CSI DENTAL SERVICES IS MADE
POSSIBLE BY THE UTILIZATION OF A HIGHLY EFFICIENT GROUP
• ~ PRACTICE WITH NO ADMINISTATIVE COSTS DUE TO FORMS,
AUTHORIZATIONS, PAPER WORK, ETC.
The following list compares CSI with area fees:
DENTAL SERVICES
Six-Month Check-Up
Bitewing X-Rays
Consultation
Fluoride Application
Cleaning (Prophylaxis)
Filling Restoration (3 surface)
Full Mouth X-Ray (Panorex)
Routine Extractions
Dentures (Full Upper and Lower)
Porcelain Crown (Cap)
Orthodontics (Braces)
ELSEWHERE CSI
$ 25.00 $ -0-
45.00 -0-
20.00 -0-
15.00 -0-
35.00 9.00
58.00 11.00
25.00 -0-
35.00 10.00
950.00 394.00
340.00 188.00
2,550.00 1,280.00
$8.90/Member $15.90/Member & Dependent $19.90/Family
CSI MONTHLY FEES ENTITLE AN INDIVIDUAL OR THE ENTI
FREE CHECK-UPS, X-RAYS, CONSULTATIONS, FLUORIDES, AND MORE.
ALL OTHER DENTAL SEVICES ARE OFFERED AT FAR BELOW AREA FEES.
FEES.
{gPORTE
Phon• 470.4719
4I0 FNmwnl Pllay. Ew
AcnwJr-.n NIyA Bc•o-1
4188 ,,.
4CMOOE ~
•_
eaoaowar
HOUSTON
Phone 669.0717
2616 S. LaoP W.. Soe• 470
Near The Aolodame
O y
J ¢ a4i40 2
y ~ Y DOME 2
3 O ~
PASADENA
Phone 944.48.76
1441 Ballle Rd.
Neon B•v+har• Ha•pltd
>' SPENCER
OC ~
3 W Nt7naa
~ nWn1Y
0
wooouwr
N m f
sm slnirH 1 nnP
VISTA
.. .
• ~
rxua I ti ~ t tL-~ - CSI FORM 021
Complete r Dentures 197
+ Complete Lower Dentures 197
AFFORDABLE FAMILY Temporary Partial Acrylic 90
DENTAL PROGRAMS Upper Chrome Partial 289
• i~ Lower Chrome Partial 289
Repairs to Dentures or Partials 45
DTAGNOSTIC DENTISTRY - Reline Complete Denture Lab 62
EXAMS ~ Reline Partial Denture Lab 62
Clinical Oral Exam (initial) No Charge Tissue Conditioning 30
Periadic'Otal Exam (2 per year) No Charge Adjustment Complete Denture No Charge
Emergency Oral Exam No Charge Adjustment Partial Denture No Charge
X-Ray Full Mouth No Charge Repair Partial Dentures 45
X-Ray Single No Charge Replace Tooth (partial denture) IS
Replace Tooth (complete denture) 1S
Add Tooth Partial Lab Fee
• Add Clast H•ith Rest Lab Fec
lAPORTE HOUSTON PASADENA Du licate Denture Complete Lab Fec
P"°M ~7at7N Plane 669.0717 Phnne 9~~•Y976 p
~IOfrm~aw Pl•W. Eu~ Z616 S. Loop w.. Sn°~ X70 7ax1 Erw<l~° "a. Cast Pontic 178
~0.../,..: "'°" a`"..r "~°' The nmodoa° "t0'a0"'"O"' "nom Recement Facing Pontic No Charge
'A' -- o s SPENCER 3/4 Crown Abutment 178
~~ ~ ® ~ s ,_„" = W Recement Bridge No Charge
m W Y1t4f
~• Y DOME
s W ~ z a aY~ ^°'"'" Rcplacc bmkcn pontic or
' BROADWAY w ~ p O" y S ^ tvoomAw" rcp:-ir b:idgc il• possible No Charge
610 SOVrI° 1•,eop VISTA Stress Breaker 7S
Precision Attachment 75
OTHER SERVICES -
Urthodontic 1;xam S4 Emergency Pallative Treatment 9
PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY - Nitrous Oxide Analgesia No Charge
Stannous Flouride Treatment No Charge Consultation No Charge
Acid Flouride Application ~ No Charge Office Visit No Treatment No Charge
Dietary Planning No Charge Regional flock Anesthesia No Charge
Home Care Instruction No Charge Other drugs .or medicaments No Charge
Space Maintainer -Fixed SO Application of desensitizing medicaments No Charge
Space Maintainer -Stainless SO Occlusal Sealants (Complete Mouth) 48
Space Maintainer Removable Acrylic SO •
•
PERIODOIv'T1CS -
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY - Dental Cleaning -Adult 9
Amalgam -1 Surface (Permanent Tooth) 11 Scaling 9
Amalgam --2 Surface (Permanent tooth) 11 Dental Cleaning -Child 9
Amalgam --3 Surface (Permanent tooth) 11 Gingival Curettage/Quadrant SO
Nu+•afil or Acid Etch (for esthetics) ~ 42 Gingvoplast/Quadrant 90
1 Surface Composite Filling ~ I S Osseous Surgery Flap/Quadrant 90
2 Surface Composite Filling 1 S Gingivectomy Per Tooth 40
3 Surface Composite Filling 1 ~ Gingivectomy/Quadrant (mild pcriodontitus) 90
Porcelain with metal crown 188 Flap Procedures Per Quad 90
.Full Crown ~ 178 Non Surgical Service Periodontal No Charge
Stainless Crown 24 Periodontal Plaque Carc No Charge
Temporary Cn~wns Nn Charge Occlusial Adjustment Limited No Charge
Post Carc Rcinli~rcc 42 Periodontal Scaling ~ Rcxtt Planning Partial Na Charge
I:rrrntent Inlay Nu Charge Special Periodontal Applctnce 7S
Rcrcntcnt CraKn Nu Ch:tr):c ORTHODONTICS
Sc~latit~ Ita.c Nu CharFc
Sctiative I=dlinE+ Nu Charge Non extraction case, upper ~ IoKCr arch 1280
Amalgam •• I Surface (hah~• roach) l l 4-Bicuspid ext. case, upper & la~~•cr arch ISSO
Amalgam --2 Surface (hah~• tooth) I I Adults 350
Amalgam --3 Surface (baby tooth) I 1 Palatal Expansion
Resin I Surfacc~ No Charge ORAL SURGERY -
Rcsin 2 Surface No Charge Simple Extraction 10
Post or Pin for Crown 42 Simple Extractions Each Additonal 17
ENDODONTICS - Surgical Extraction Partially Erupted 3S
Pulp Cap Direct No Charge Soft Tissue Impaction 3S
Pulp Cap Indirect No Charge Bony Impaction 65
. Recalcification No Charge IV Sedation 65
Vital Pulpotomy No Charge Root Recovery 3S
• RCT I Canal 88 Tooth Rcplanation No Charge
RCT 2 Canals 108 Surg. Exposure Tooth 6S
RCT 3 Canals 128 incise & Drain Abccss Intraoral IS
RCT 4 Canals 148 Simple Suture No Charge
Emergency Procedures Endodontics Na Charge Alvcoplasty Kith extraction of teeth No CharFc
Frcnulcculmy Na CharFc
Excision Hypcrlrlrstic Tls,uc Nu Charge
4-4a
.~
•
CITY OF L.A~PORTE
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
T0:
FROM:
• SUBJECT:
DATE : ~ June 8 , 1981+
r of Public Works
'roperty on Ave "C"
As you are.aware the City of La Porte stored brush on the property north
of the service center following Hurricane Alicia.
The original arrangements with the Carter Trust, with Charles D. Boyle
acting as the representative of that trust, were to restore the property
to its original condition.
Plans and specifications have been prepared by Carlos Smith Engineering.
The estimate to restore the property is approxiamtely $11+0,000.
This project would be eligible for Federal Emergency Management Administration
funds as discussed with FEMA officials from Austin.
We are requesting permission to go out for bids so that this property can be
restored in a timely manner.
JLH/me
U