Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-30 Public Hearing- -'~ ~. . C MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON REVENUE SHARING JULY 30, 1984 The public hearing on revenue sharing was called to order at 7:11 P.M. at the request of the City's Chief Executive Officer, City Manager Jack Owen. Mayor Pro Tem Deotis Gay presided. Mr: Owen read briefly from the regulations regarding revenue sharing public hearings and explained the purpose of the hearing. He reported the amount of estimated funds that would be available for revenue sharing is $258,718 from the Federal revenue sharing fund and an estimated carryover fund balance from last year of $91,282, for an estimated total of $350,000. !~~ _-" Mayor Pro Tem Gay asked if there was anyone present who would like to make a proposal for the expenditure of these funds. Mr. Cecil Knight of the Spenwick Addition proposed that street lights into the addition be installed at several locations: C Canada Road and Spencer, Clarkville and Spencer, Bayer and Spencer, Hilldale and Spencer, Andricks and Underwood, Belfast and Underwood, Carlow and Underwood and Catlett and Underwood. Mr. Owen stated that the City might be able to handle this particular request from the other budget without resort:~ng to revenue sharing funds. Mr. Gay proposed a $12,000 expenditure for Gulf Coast Community Services transportation project and a television set and a piano for the Jenny Riley Civic Center. Councilperson Matuszak stated he would like to see a road put on the east side of the Leo Rizzuto elementary school so that students living in Fairmont Park East would have access getting to the school. This would be an extension of Catlett. Mr. Owen replied that it is best not to have items in revenue sharing that would require going out for bids, due to the require- ments of the Bacon-Davis Act being so strict that it would cost more than the funds to be allocated. Mr. Matuszak stated that he realized that, but the request still stood. Councilperson Westergren would like to see us look into pro- viding sewage to those people on West D adjacent to the airport. She recognized the fact that it could not be done with revenue sharing funds, but perhaps the funds could be used to purchase street materials or other types of material, then some of that money could be used to do the sewage. ~~ --- Virginia Cline, Mayor ~" a- !~~ °~ C Minutes, Public Hearing on Revenue Sharing July 30, 1984, Page 2 • Mr. Matuszak suggested that perhaps we could also get street materials for D Street and pave it. Mr. Skelton noted that the street was on the paving list. Mr. Gay was in accord with the sewage and street paving. c Mr. Skelton agreed with Mrs. Westergren that sewer is needed in that area, but noted that it would take half a million dollars to put everyone on the sewer line. Mrs. Pauline Lewis requested that North Fifth Street be fixed. Mr. Skelton requested, as a citizen, that a $24,000 appro- priation be used to build three fishing piers of 100 feet each, on the City right-of-ways - two in the far east part of La Porte and one the other side of Sylvan Beach Mr. Matuszak would like $20,000 used to continue the beauti- fication program - perhaps the intersection of 146 and Spencer Highway being an example. Mr. Gay asked for a $5,000 appropriation to the park fund for the park on the west side of 146. There bein~~ no further input, the public hearing was adjourned at 7:29 P.M. Respectfully submitted: Cherie Black, City Secretary Passed & Approved this the 15th day of August, 1984 Virginia Cline, Mayor ~. • cap` RESOLUTION NO. 84-14 ~~ ~~ A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE REALIGAIMENT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE EXTENSION OF BAY AREA BOULEVARD BETWEEN WEST MAIN STREET (SPENCER HIGHWAY) AND FAIRMONT PARKWAY, IN THE CITY OF LA PORTE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: Section 1. By Deed dated December 13, 1974, filed for record in the office of the Harris County Clerk on January 24, 1975, under Harris County Clerk's File No. E351190, Stephen T. Cochran, et al, conveyed to the City of La Porte, certain prop- erty described as Tract II in said Deed, as right-of-way for the extension of Bay Area Boulevard from Fairmont Parkway to Spencer Highway. Subsequently, Stephen T. Cochran, et al, have conveyed the land immediately contiguous to said Tract II to PPG Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. Also, subsequent to said con- veyance, the County of Harris and the Harris County Flood Control District, have requested the widening, and the realignment, of said proposed right-of-way. The City of La Porte, a municipal corporation, and PPG Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, are agreeable to the realignment of said right-of-way. Section 2. The City Council of the City of La Porte hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute, and the City Secretary to attest the execution of, a Special Warranty Deed, conveying said Tract II, as described in said Deed dated December 13, 1974, from Stephen T. Cochran, et al, to the City of La Porte, a municipal corporation, as recorded under Harris County Clerk's File No. E351190, said con- veyance to be from the City of La Porte, a municipal corporation, by Special Warranty Deed, to PPG Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. The Mayor of the City of La Porte is authorized to deliver said executed Special Warranty Deed to PPG Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, in exchange for a properly exe- cuted Deed from PPG Industries, Inc., as Grantor, to the public, as Grantee, conveying those certain parcels of land as more par- • • Resolution No. 84-14, Page 2. titularly described by metes and bounds on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", each of which exhibits are attached hereto, incorporated by reference herein, and made a part hereof for all purposes. Section 3. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law, Article 6252-17, Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 4. This Resolution shall be in effect from and after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 5th day of September, 1984. CITY OF LA PORTE By ATTEST: ~~.~ City Secre ary APPROVED: City Attorney • • LEGAL DRAFT FOR BAY AREA BOULEVARD EXTENSION Being a 17.8749 acre, more or less, parcel out of (a) that certain 495.40639 acre tract of land out of the Richard Pearsall Survey, Abstract No. 625, Harris County, Texas, which tract was conveyed unto PPG Industries, Inc., by Fairmont, Ltd. under general warranty deed dated March 28, 1980, and filed for record April 2, 1980, in the Deed Records of Harris County, Texas, under Film Code No. 154-90-0155: And (b) that certain 9.89213 acre parcel of land conveyed by Fairmont, Ltd., to the City of La Porte and filed for record under County Clerk's File No. 351190 and which was .by deed dated and filed of even date herewith conveyed by the City of La Porte to PPG Industries, Inc., said 17.8749 acre, more or less, parcel of land being for the purpose of extending Bay Area Boulevard, 200 feet in width, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows, to wit: COMMENCING at the point of intersection of the West right- of-way line of 25th Street, a road 60 feet in width as shown on the plat of La Porte, Block 734, recorded in Volume 67, Page 1, of Harris County Map Records, and the South right-of-way line of West Main (Spencer Highway), a road 114 feet in width: THENCE, South 03° 03' 43" East with the West right-of-way line .of 25th Street, a distance of 421.109 feet to a point~in the Northerly property line of the aforementioned 495.40639 acre tract; . THENCE, South 86° 31' 11" West with the said Northerly property line, a distance of 171.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point also being the most Northeastern corner of the 17.8749 acre tract described herein; THENCE, South 03° 03' 43" East, a distance of 1.47 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE, generally Southwardly with a curve to the righ t having a central angle of 30° 30' 00", a radius of 1,505.00 feet and a curvilinear distance of 801.15 feet, to a point of tangency; THENCE, South 27° 26' 17" West with the tangent 397.88 feet to a point of curvature; EXEiIBIT "A.. Page 1 of 3 . .. • • THENCE, generally Southwardly with a curve to the left having a central angle of 47° 20' 41", a radius of 1.,367.18 feet, and a curvilinear distance of 1.,129.73 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE, South 19° 54' 24" East with the tangent, a distance of 1,006.94 feet to a point of curvature; ° THENCE, generally Southwardly with a curve to the right having a central angle of 18° 53' 17", a radius of 1,688.80 feet, and a curvilinear distance of 556.73 feet to a point of tangency, said point also being the most Southeastern corner of the 17.8749 acre tract described herein, said point also being in the Southerly property line of the aforementioned 495.40659 acre tract, said point also being South 86° 56' 40" West, a distance of 29.41 feet from a copper weld rod stamped "A-103", an interior corner of that certain 499.4306 acre tract as described in Volume 8076 on page 16 of the Harris County Deed Records, said copper weld rod also being an interior corner of the aforementioned 495.40639 acre tract; THENCE, South 86° 56' 40" West with said Southerly property line, a distance of 200.12 feet to a point for corner, said point being the most Southwestern corner of the 17.8749 acre tract described herein; THENCE, North O1° O1' 07" West, a distance of 7.11 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE, generally Northwardly with a curve ~o the left having a central angle of 18° 53' 17", a radius of 1,488.80 feet, and a curvilinear distance of 490.80 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE, North 19° 54' 24" West with the tangent a distance of 1,006.94 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE, generally Northwardly with a curve to the right having a central angle of 47° 20' 41", a radius of 1,567.18 feet, and .a curvilinear distance of 1,294.99 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE, North 27° 26' 17" East with the tangent, a. distance of 397.88 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE, generally Northwardly with a curve to the left having a central angle of 30° 30' 00", a radius of 1,305.00 feet, and a curvilinear distance of 694.68 feet to a point of tangency; said .. point being the most Northwestern corner of the 17.8749 acre tract described herein; said point also being in the Northerly property line of the aforementioned 495.40639 acre tract; E?~IIBIT "A" Page 2 of 3 • ~ .~ • THENCE, North 86° 31' 11" East with said Northerly property line, a distance of 200.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, enclosing a tract of land containing 17.8749 acres, more or less. ~IIBIT "A" Page 3 of 3 • • NiETFS & BOUL~ID6 DESCRIPTION OF 150' DRAIL~GE EASII~]'P Being a 150 feet wide drainage easement across (a) that certain 495.40639 acre tract of land out of the Richard Pearsall Survey, Abstract No. 625, Harris County, Texas, wfiidz atract was conveyed unto PPG Industries, Inc., by E~irrront, Ltd., under general warranty deed dated Mardi 28, 1980, and filed fnr recon3 April 2, 1980, in the Deed Records of Harris County, Texas, under Film Code No. 154-90-0155; and (b) that certain 4.3697 acre tract of land out of the Richan3 Pearsall Survey, Abstract No. 625, Harris County, Texas, which tract was conveyed unto PPG Industries, Inc., by Chenetron Corp., under general warranty deed dated February 22, 1979, and filed for record in the Deed Records of Harris County, Texas, under Film Code No. 120-97-0815, said drainage easement being rmre particularly described by metes and bounds as follows, to-merit: 00[~~]CING at capper weld rod No. A-104 located in the North right-of way line of Fairmmnt Parkway; THFI>iCE, S 86° 52' 43" W, a distance of 249.41 feet to a point, said point being in the intersection of the North right-of-way line oaf Fairmont Parkway, and the West right~fway of Bay Area Boulevard; N O1° O1' 08" W, a distance of 514.72 feet to a point; TEiENNCE, S 86° 56' 40" W, a distance of 10 feet, said point being the POINT C~' BE]GINNING of the following described drainage easement; .. THH3JCE, N 03° 55' 32" W, a distance of 150.02 feet to a point; THENCE, N 86° 56' 40" E, a distance of 2100.26 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE, generally Southeastwardly with a curve to the right having a central angel of 50° 50' O1" a radius of 434.28 feet, and a curvilinear distance of 384.44 feet to a point on a. line not tangent to this curve; THENCE, N 86° 56' 40" E, a distance of 99.04 feet to a point, said point being the Southeast corner of the aforementioned 495.40639 acre tract and also .the Northeast corner of the aforemrentioned 4.3697 acre tract; THENCE, S 03° 03' 17" E, a distance of 501.48 feet to a point, said point being the Southeast corner of the aforementioned 4.3697 acre tract ar~d also being in the North right-~f-way line of Fairmront Parjcway; EXHIBIT "B.. Page 1 of 2 • • THENCE, S 86° 52' 43" W, along the North right-of-way line of Fairmont Parkway a distance of 60 feet to a point; THENCE, N 03° 03' 17" W, a distance of 161.24 feet along the west 60' H.C.F.D. drainage easement to a point. THENCE, N 48° 03' 17" W, a distance of 106.96 feet to a point of curvature. THENCE, generally Northwestwardly with a curve to the left having a central angle of 88° 03' 49" a radius of 284.28 feet, and a curvilinear distance of 434.67 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE, S 86° 56' 40" W, a distance of 2113.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING enclosing a tract of land containing 9.6296 acres more or less. EXfiIBIT "B.. Page 2 of 2 .. T0: FROM :. SUBJECT CITY OF LA PORTE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ity Manager DATE : S~~ptembe~• 7 , 198 Director of Public~Works ices for Proposed Sanitary Landfill Site Services to be provided are as follows: A. Boundary of 80 acre sanitary landfill. 3. Two foot contour lines. C. Location o~f all known easements, based on abstracting fizi•nished by City. D. Location of all visible improvements including ditches, power poles, driveways, railroad line, roadway of Bay Area Blvd., or• any other visible improvements. E. Horizontal and vertical location of six bore holes. F. Field time, EDM usage, mileage and supplies. G. Office time, computations, drafting, and descriptions. After'studying two proposals for this service, it is my recommendation to award the contract to H. Carlos Smith Engineers & Surveyors, Inc., not to exceed w8;~500.00. Funds for surveying services are budgeted in the 83-8k budget. If you should have any questions, please advise. JLHime ,. "i H. CARLOS SMITH ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS, INC. 718 S. Broadway P.O. Box M La Porte, Texas 77571 (713] 471-4226 City of La Porte P. 0. Box 1115 La Porte, Texas 77571 Attn: Mr. Jerry Hodge Director of Public Works September 5, 1984 Re: Proposed 80± Acre Land Fill Site Dear Mr. Hodge: The following is our proposal to conduct certain survey work, as per your request. This proposal modify's our original proposal of 10 August, 1984, to take into consideration revised parameters as outlined by you: Boundary survey of 80± Acre Tract Fee $1,750.00. Topographic Survey of 80± Acre Tract Establish 200' grid and 2' Contour interval Fee: $6,850..00 Total fee not to exceed $8,500.00. Very truly yours, H. Carlos SJmith, Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. ~ /' ./ ~ d.-.L'~ ~ ~i' H. Carlos Smith, P.E. President ti INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM AUGUST 6, 1984 T0: J. Sease - Fire Chief FROM: J. Ray - Purchasing Ag t SUBJECT: Sealed Bid ~~0049: 5" F' Hose - 100' Sections Advertised, sealed bid's 40049 for the purchase of 700 feet of 5" fire hose were opened and read in City Council Chambers August 6, 1984 at 4 p.m. Bid invitations were mailed to six area fire hose vendors with the following five returning bids; (1) Casco Inc., (2) Tackaberry Co., (3) Halprin Supply Co., (4) Arthur Dooley & Son, and (5) Boots and Coots Fire and Protective Equipment. All vendors that submitted bids met specifications and warranty criteria Low bid was submitted by Casco Industries in the amount of $3,962.00 and a delivery time of 45 days. I hereby recommend that the City of La Porte purchase the aforementioned 700 feet of 5" fire hose from Casco Industries Inc. on the basis of low bid meeting specifications for a total of $3,962.00 I trust this recommendation will meet with your approval. JR/mb cc: B. Herrera Item: Sealed Bid 40049 ** Casco Ind. Tackaberry Halprin 5" Fire Hose, 100' Sections Company Supply Highlands, Deer Park, Hous Tx. Tx. Tx Arthur oots & Coot Co. Dooley Fire & & Son Protective Equipment ton, Houston, Houston, Tx 1. A. 5" Fire Hose - Price Per Foot $5.50 Ft. $7.55 Ft. • $5.98 Ft. $6.30 Ft. Tx. $5.85 F• B. Total Price - 700 Ft. $3,850.00_ $5,285.00 $4,186.00 $4,410.00•• $4,095.( 2. Estimated Delivery Time in Days .30-45 Days 42 Days 45-60-~Days - -60 Days 15 Days 3. State Warranty Terms 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 4. Prompt Payment Discount None None None None None 5. Spanner Wrenches $112.00 N/C 118.00 133.00 109.00 6. Total Price $3,962.00 $5,285.00 4,304.00 4 543.00 4,204.( ** Denotes Low Bid KNOX W. ASKINS, J. D., P. C. ATTORNEY AT LAW JOHN D. ARMSTRONG, J.D. ASSOCIATE 702 W. FAIRMONT PARKWAY P. O. BOX 1216 LA PORTE, TEXAS 77571-1218 TELEPHONE 713 471-1886 Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF LA PORTE City Hall La Porte, Texas 77571 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: August 15, 1984 The recent resignations of two members of City Council has raised questions concerning quorum of Council, and voting by Council on particular issues, until these vacant positions are filled. Based on Texas Court decisions, it is my opinion that a quorum is a majority of the whole Council, i.e., it will take five Council members present to constitute a quorum to conduct a lawful meeting. A majority vote of the members present and voting is usually sufficient to carry an issue, although certain State laws require a larger vote, such as on certain zoning matters, for example. However, on most issues, if a quorum of five members is present, a majority of that number, or three Councilpersons, would constitute a majority vote. Section 4.03, Sub-paragraph (c), of the Home Rule Charter, provides that the budget shall be adopted by the favorable votes of at least a majority of all members of the whole Council. Thus, five favorable votes will be required for the adoption of the budget, which sets the tax rate. Yours very truly, Knox W. Askins City Attorney City of La Porte KWA:kr s Z'O: CITY MANAGER FROM: DATA:.~ .. .. Public Works Director August 1, 1981+ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL'AGENDA ITEM 1. Agenda Date Requested: August 15, 1981+ 2. X Report Resolution Ordinance 3. Project Summary: Annual sign material contract. 1+. Action Required: Approve recommendation to accept low bids and execute contracts. 5 .. Alt~ernat~ive Buy on the spot market. b. Recommendation Accept bids and award contracts to vendors by Section on the basis of low bid. 7. Exhibits: Attached. 8. Availability of Funds: General Fund _ Water/Wastewater Capital Improvmt. General Revenue Sharing Other Account Number: Funds Av~b,ilable: X Yes No ~~Director of Public Works Approved for City Counc City Manager Date .~ G~, • ~ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM JULY 31, 1984 T0: J. Hodge - Director of P~:bl' FROM: J. Ray - Purchasing Agent, ,~ ~ I`` // SUBJECT: Sealed Bid 40046 - Sign Mat~gh~al Advertised, sealed bids 460046 for the City of La Porte's annual sign material contract were opened and read in City Council Chambers July 23, 1984 at 4 p.m. Bid Invitations were mailed to seven manufacturers and distributors of sign material with responses being received from the following vendors: 1) Crabtree Barricade Systems, 2) Safety Lights Co., 3) Price Barricade Signal, Inc., 4) Vulcan Signs, and 5) Sargent-Sowell, Inc. The materials specified in the annual contract will be• purchased on an as needed basis by the Street Division of the City of La Porte for sign fabrication and ~ maintenance programs. These materials are presently purchased on spot quotations in quantities less than $3,000 per order. Purchasing these items in bulk from an annual fixed price contract will enable the Street Division to save up to 15y over prices paid under the present purchasing procedure. ~ Materials were divided into sections with Section I covering reflective sheeting, sign faces, letter and numbers and Section II covering sign blanks, hardware, and channel posts. Low bid in Section IC by~Crabtree Barricade Systems was rejected for being non- specific. Low bid in Section 2B by Sargent-Sowell Inc. and second low bid in Section 2B by Price Barricade and Signal Inc. were both rejected for specifying "all or none" on their bid quantities. The City of La Porte is unable to comply with "all or none" requirements due to its' inability to accurately forecast actual consumption of these materials. I hereby recommend that the City of La Porte award an annual contract to the following vendors by Section on the basis of low bid meeting specifications: 1. Section lA: Reflective Sheeting - Crabtree Barricade Systems 2. Section 1B: Letters and Numbers - Vulcan Signs 3. Section 1C: Sign Faces - Vulcan Signs 4. Section 2A: Aluminun Blanks and Hardware - Vulcan Signs 5. Section 2B: Channel Posts - Vulcan Signs I trust this recommendation will meet with your approval. JR/mb cc: B. Herrera S. Gillett L. Morris . SEALED BID ~~0046: SIGN MATERIAL Crabtree Safety PBS Inc. Vulcan Sargent- Barco Barricade Lights Co. Signs Sowell Inc Municipal Tabulation by Section Systems Products Beaumont, Houston, Hearne, Foley, Grand Omaha, Tx. Tx. Tx. A1. rairie Tx. Ne. 1. Section I: Reflective Sheeting?, Sign Faces, Letters and Numbers A. Reflective Sheetin B. Letters and Numbers C. Sign Faces 2. Section II: Blanks, Hard- 6,911.00 9,255.45 8,204.00 8 324.40 2,928.50 4,372.65 2,859.25 2 765.66 3,605.44 5,089.25 5,120.21 3,847.95 BID NO BID BID NO BID BID NO BID ware and Channel Posts A. Aluminum Blanks and NO BID 16,919.80 11,362.40 10,409.16 NO BID Hardware BID B. Channel Posts NO BID NO BID 6,489.00 6,663.00 6,183.00 I NO BID llelivery Time i 5 Days~10-45 Days 30 _ rLC~mUL ravment lliscount j -- ~ __ ~ __ 21-40 Da 30-60 Da s NO BID Sealed Bid ~~0046: Sign Material Tabulation by Item Crabtree Safety Barricade Lights (Systems Co. PBS Inc. Vulcan Signs Sargent- Barco Sowell Inc. Municipal Products Section I. A. ... Beaumont, Tx. Houston, Hearne, Tx. Tx. Foley, Alabama Grand Omaha, Prairie,Tx. Ne. 1. 6" x 50 yd. Green Sheeting Reflective 69.50/rl. 89.10/rl. 72.00/rl. 72.45/rl. NO BID NO BIL ..NO BID 2. 24" x 50 yd. Black Sheeting Reflectiv 247.90/rl. 356.25/rl 288.00/rl. 316.50/rl NO BID NO BID '3. 24" x 50 yd. White Sheeting Reflectiv 268.00/rl. 356.40/rl 288.00/rl. 289.80/rl NO BID NO BID 4. 6" x 50 yd. Red Reflective Sheeting 69.50/rl. g9.10/rl. 72.00/rl. 72.45/rl. NO BID NO BID 5. 24" x 50 yd. Orange five Sheeting Reflec- 268.00/rl. 356.40/rl. 288.00/rl. 289.80/rl NO BID NO BID 6. 24" x 50 yd. Blue Reflective Sheeting 268.00/rl. 356.40/rl. 288.00/rl. 289.80/rl NO BID NO BID 7. 24" x 50 yd. Yellow five Sheeting Reflec- 268.00/rl. 356.40/rl. 288.00/rl. 289.80/rl NO BID NO BID 8. Barricade Tape-Left 6" x 150 yd. with 6" Hand Stripe 146.25/rl. 195.00/rl. 230.00/rl. 225.00/rl NO BID NO BID 9. Barricade Ta a-Right 6" x 150 d. with 6" Hand Stripe 146.25/rl. 2 195.00/rl. 30.00/rl. 225.00/rl NO BID NO BID Section I. B. 1• " 'te Letters "C" ~~ a Letters "C" ~~ L tters "C" 4. 2" White Letters "C" 5. 2" Black Letters "C" 6. 2" Black Numbers 0-9 Series Series Series Series Series 4.00/pk. 3.75/pk. 2.75/pk. 1.80/pk. 1.70/ k. 6.15 k. 3.99/pk. .81 ok. 2.90/pk. k. 1.95/pk. k. 2.05/pk. 1.89/pk. 2.25 k. 1.89 k. 3.95/pk. 3.28/pk. 2.30/pk. 1.69/pk. 1.64/pk. 1.64/pk. NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BiD NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID Page 2 Sealed Bid ~~0046 Sign Material Continued • Crabtree Safety PBS Inc. Vulcan Sargent- Barco , ,Barricade Lights Co. Signs Sowell Inc `Municipal Systems Products " Black Numbers 0-9 3.75/pk. 5.81/pk. .2.90/pk. 3.28/pk. NO BID ~ -NO BID " White Pressure Sensitive 1.80/ k. 2.65/pk. 2,05/pk. 1.69/pk. NO BID NO BID umbers "C" Series 0-9 -1 pool Zone Time Plate 2.67/ea. 2.95/ 3.08 ea. / 2.31/ea. NO BID . NO BID - .m. 2-4 .m. nter 30" x 30" 6.70/ea. 10.75; ~ 9.89/ea. 6.81/ea. NO BID NO BID ool Crossin 6.70/ea. 9.35; 10.74/ea. 6.81/ea. NO BID NO BID " chool Advance Warnin 6.70/ea. 9.35/ 10.74/ea. 6.81/ea. NO BID NO BID " x 24" White Face 4.40/ea. 6.90/ 6.72/ea. 4.36/ea. NO BID NO BID orders " x 0" Kee Ri ht 5.50/ea. 8.65/ .1 ea. 5.45/ea. NO BID NO BID " x 8" School Si n 2.28/ea. 2.35/~~ ea. 1.45/ea. NO BID NO BID " Sto Si n 4.20 ea. 6.00/ 4.36/ea. NO BID NO BID " " eed Limit No 5.40 ea. 7.50/ 5.45/ea. NO BID NO BID " 121-2 Fresh Oil" 24"x24" 4,55 ea. 6.90/ 6.72/ea. 4.36/ea. NO BID NO BID '14-1 "Dead End" 30"x30" 6.70 ea. 10.75/ _ 9.89/ea. 6.81/ea. NO BID NO BID " to Si n 6 ea. 9.35; 9.89/ea. 6.81/ea. NO BID NO BID ' " 8" Sin le Arrow a, 13.60/ 12.31/ea. 8.72/ea. NO BID NO BID ' " " o ble Arrow 8" x 24" End School Zone 6" RR Adv. Circle " 3,80 ea. 0 ea. 13.601 6.05/ 15.50/ 12,21 ea. 5.54 ea. 13.60 ea. 8.72/ea. 4.60/ea. 9.81/ea. NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID 8 Black Border ~~ ea. 13.50/ 8.8 ea. 13.78/ea. N D NO B or 7 .25/ea. NO BID 0 ea. 13.78/ea. NO BID NO BID Page 3 • Sealed Bid 40046 Crabtree Safety PBS Inc. Vulcan Sargent- Barco Sign Material Barricade Lights Co. Signs Sowell Inc. Municipal Systems Products Section I C. (Continued) 19. 5/8" White Border 18.90/ea. 20.25/ea. . 16.85/ea. .19.33/ea. NO BID NO BI] Section II. A. 1. Ca s & Crosses for Channel NO BID 9.10/ea. 4.06/ea. 5.85/ea. NO B ID NO BII Post 2. 12" x 18" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 3.95/ea. 2.90/ea. 2.50/ea. NO BID NO BII 3. 24" x 24" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 10.60/ea. 7,75/ea. 6.66/ea. NO BID NO BII 4. 24" x 24" Octagonal Stop NO BID 9.75/ea. 6.05/ea. 5.97/ea. NO BID NO BII Alum. Blank .080 5. 6" x 36" Extruded Alum. NO BID 5.98/ea. 5.34/ea. 3.68/ea. NO BID NO BIi Blank .080 6. 6" x 30" Extruded Alum. NO BID 4.98/ea. 4.40/ea. 3.07/ea. NO BID NO BII Blank .080 7. 8" x 24" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 3.55/ea. 2,60/ea. 2.22/ea. NO BID NO BII 8. 18" x 24" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 7.95/ea. 5.82/ea. 5.00/ea. NO BID NO BII 9. 24" x 30" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 13.25/ea. 9.69/ea. 8.33/ea. NO BID NO BII 10. 30" x 30" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 16.50/ea. 12.11 ea. 10.40/ea NO BID NO BIi 11. " x 36" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 23.85/ea. 17.45 ea. 14.99/ea NO BID NO BII " x 0" Octa oval Sto NO BID 15.25/ea. 10.77 ea. 9.31/ea. D NO BII Blank .080 13'. 24" x 48" Alum. Blank .080 NO BID 21.20/ea. 15.51 ea. 13.31/ea NO BII Section II. B. 1. 244 per ft. - Green Baked D NO BID 8.88/ea . 8.41 ea. NO BII Enamel Channel Post - Taper- ed 12' long Page 4~ Sealed Bid 40046 Sign Material • Crabtree Safety Barricade Lights Systems Co. PBS. Inc. Vulcan Sargent- Barco Signs Sowell Municipal Inc. Products Section II. B. (Continued) 2. 344 per ft. - Green Baked NO BID NO BID 12.65/ea ~ 13.33/ea 12.20/ea.. . NO BiI Enamel Channel Post - Tapered End 12 ft. long ~. i T0: CITY MANAGER FROM: DAT~:.~ ., ., Public Works Director August 10, 1981+ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL'AGENDA ITEM 2. X Report 1. Agenda Date Requested: August 15, 1981+ _ __ Resolution Ordinance 3. Project Summary: Boundary survey due to future improvements of La Porte Airport. ~+. Action Required: Authorize H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc., to do the survey. 5•. Alternative: Lack of boundary surveys may cause improvements to be placed in. wrong location. 6. Recommendation Authorize H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc. to do boundary survey at La Porte Airport. Work is estimated to cost $6,000...00. 7. Exhibits: See attached two (2) quotations from Turner Collie & Braden, Inc. and from H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc. 8. Availability of Funds: General Fund Water/Wastewater Capital Improvmt. General Revenue Sharing Other Account Number: ©/~~- 7'QD - ?'Qrf'. 70~ Funds A~r~ilable: X Yes Nb 9• Approved for City Council Agenda Ci Mana er Date • i H. CARLOS SMITH ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS, INC. PHONE A/C 713 471-4226 718 SOUTH BROADWAY P. O. BOX M LAPORTE,TEXAS 77571 June 11, 1984 Mr. Jerry Hodge Director of Public Works City of La Porte Dear Mr. Hodge: As per your instruction, we have prepared an estimated cost for the follow- ing professional surveying services regarding the La Porte Municipal Airpbrt__. which is approximately 300 acres in the W. M. Jones Survey, A-482. The boundary survey of the 300 acre tract will require substantial work to re-establish the boundaries. The Southwest corner and Southeast corner have been obliterated or lost due to construction over the years. The Northwest and Northeast corners of the Airport do not exist except for the 8" Fence corner post which are approximate. The boundary survey will include locating the existing Humble Pipeline right-of-way and preparing a survey plat to indicate the results of our survey. You also requested surveying each lease site and locating the runway and taxiways. In order to survey the lease sites, it would be necessary to first locate the centerline of the existing runways and taxiways to make certain that the lease sites do not extend into the present clear zones. All corners of the lease site and Airport .boundary will be monumented with 5/8 inch iron rods 33± inches in length. As per your instructions, no improvements will be located are shown other than the centerline of existing runways and taxiways. The estimated cost to perform this professional service is as follows: 1. Boundary Survey (3001 Acres) @ $6,000.00 2. Location of Runways and Taxiways @ $2,200.00 3. Survey of Lease Sites @ $3,500.00 Total Estimated Cost $11,700.00 Yours truly., James F. Beck Registered Public Surveyor ~~2021 V TurnerCollie~Braden Inc. April 17, 1984 Mr. Jerry Hodge Director of Public Works City of La Porte P. O. Box 1115 La Porte, Texas 77571 Re: Survey Needed for La Porte Airport Dear Jerry: PO BOX 13089 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77219 5757 WOODWAY 713 780-4100 TELEX 774185 TCB HOU As you know, we have plotted the airport .boundary and located the leases and facilities, as best we could, from miscellaneous descriptions provided. The problems we ran into included re- ferences to a bench mark that is buried somewhere in a boulevard, lack of any definable ties and descriptions that don't close. It would be in the City's best interest to have some survey work performed to bring in some control and pin things down. Esti- mated cost for the suggested work is: Basic Boundary $ 7,600 (fence ties, pipeline, etc.) Leases ~ 5,000 RW/TW 2,150 TOTAL ~ $14,750 Basically, the descriptions and ties. presently available just don't adequately tell the City what is there and where. Please talk this over and see if you agree that the survey should be performed. If you need more information, give me a call. Very truly ours, /rYtti. James R. Adams, P.E. Project Director JRA/dr cc: Mark Hardy Larry Gaines CONSULTING ENGINEERS • TEXAS AUSTIN/DALLAS/EL PASO/HOUSTON/PORT ARTHUR COLORADO DENVER/GRAND JUNCTION • - -.. ~.. LwF W group inc. 12700 PARK CENTRAL, SUITE 1805, DALLAS, TEXAS 75251, 214-233-5561 August 30, 1984 Mr. Jerry Hodge Director of Public Works City of LaPorte 604 West Fairmount Parkway LaPorte, Texas 77571 Dear Jerry: After reviewing the Microcomputer specification for "The Work Management System TM" and the vendor proposals to achieve these specifications, Irecommend that you accept the bid for a Data General Model 10/SP Microcomputer from HMS, Inc. The specifications for this microcomputer are attached. I realize this microcomputer is almost twice as expensive as the IBM microcomputer also proposed, but if the City is going to follow the data processing strategy currently in effect, the Model 10/SP is the only practical solution. Other reasons are: • The bid specifies that the microcomputer be capable of running the City's office automation products supplied by Data General, C.E.O. C.E.O. is not easily/practically run on the IBM PC -this would cause an operator severe problems when switching from a Data General terminal to the microcomputer. . • The potential problem of whose problem it is when a hardware malfunc-..:on occurs while the microcomputer is connected to the City's host system. If it is the same malfunction that maintains the host, then there should be no "finger pointing"/lack of assuming responsibility. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Ramond W. (Chip) Collins Partner RWC/mah Enclosure ~~1 PROFESSIONALS SERVING MANAGEMENT DALLAS • FORT WORTH • HOUSTON .. - H.M.S., INC. CUSTOMER: LA PORTE, TEXAS SYSTEM: DESRTOP GENERATION MODEL 10/SP DATE: AUGUST 6, 1984 QTY MODEL DESCRIPTION UNIT MONTH TOTAL TOTA # PRICE MAINT PRICE MAIN' 1 91297 Desktop Model 10/SP $7,105 $79 $7,105 $79 Power Supply 256KB Memory . 368KB Diskette 15MB Disk 1 4463-WT USAM-1 300 4 300 4 1 4531 Printer 160CPS 1,660 38 1,660 38 1 1622 Isolation Transformer 595 5 595 5 HARDWARE TOTAL $9,660 $126 SYSTEM SOFTWARE 1 30568 DG/BOOS $200 1 30540 MS/DOS under DG/BOOS 80 1 X0800 dBase II under MS/DOS 695 1 30561 DG/Gate under DG/BOOS 500 TOTAL SYSTEM SOFTWARE $1,475 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 1,512 TOTAL HARDWARE, SYSTEM SOFTWARE $12,647 AND ANNUAL MAINTENANCE DISCOUNT 2,000 GRAND TOTAL $10,647 • • • TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: DATE:.~.~ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITII~I 1. Agenda Date Requested: 2• Report Resolution Ordinance 3. Project Summary: ~+. Action Required: 5 .. Alt~ernat~ive 6. Recommendation 7. Exhibits: 8. Availability of Funds: General Fund Water/Wastewater Capital Improvmt. General Revenue Sharing Other Account Number: Funds Available: Yes ~ No Requested By 9. Approved for City Council Agenda City Manager Date • Sealed Bid ~~0047: I~ Microcomputers and Peripherals IBM Thogersen Gra W y, elsh Data . HIKS,Inc. Computer ray & Asso General Service Inc. -Two wR.ayer- 1300 Main Houston, Tx Houston,Tx aPorte, Tx Houston,T Houston, MaGaetta ... _ / 10: 16 bit configeration w/key- board (Price to include 1 yr, '' maintenance) ~• ~4xS0 or 24x132 Monochrome 479.50 628 00 Included ..Included Included ncluded display screen . in 1 3. 80 CPS 132-Column Dot 831.24 10 .00 1 8. 0 Matrix Printer w/tractor feed 4. 10 MB formatted ca acit inclided Included Included Included Included Incl d d in 1 u e ri id disk 5. As nchronous communications inclided Included ' Included Included n 1 600.00 600.00 ada for RS-232 6• eratin S stem (DOS 2.1 130.00 1 Included .00 in 1 2160.00 200.00 560.00 type) 7. dBase II Data Base Mana e- 1400.00 700.00 1390 00 . 1390.00 20000.00 1000.00 went S stem 8. Com uter AC Power NO BID NO BID 179 00 Protection . 300.00 -- 1190.00 9. Deliver Time in Da s 45 Da s 3 Da s 10 10. Prom t Pa ent Discount -- Da s 21-60Da s 2Z 20 Da s 60 Da s 11. 1 Year Maintenance Included in ~~1 __ Included __ Included IncOluded -1 000.00 in 1 in 1 in 1 2,430.00 2,856.00 TOTAL 10,026.14 12,220.00 14,285.00 28 248.00 27 850 00 -564.96 . ~ 22 336.00 27.683_n~ -1,000.00 .,, ...._ __ • Office of the r MAYOR ~+ 0F. L A Pail e,~: ;~` CITY OF ~., :~ LA PORTS x~~~a~a~i~n ~~l` Our Saxe' a ~u~Wee .P,i.ed .in the .a~Jceng~h. a~ au~r. ~am.i,Zi.eb and xhe neg.~eex a~ acvc ehc.~d~cen unde~ni,neb ~b~.e hape o~ the gu~wr.e; and WH~R~AS, xhe ~a,c,P.evice a~ panew.ta xo ~a.Fze ~~.naneia.Q ne6pana.~b.e,P,ity fan the-vc, ch.cednen ~.n phis Sate .ie necagrli.zed ass ano~hen ba~cm ob e.hied abed e; and GIH~R~AS, ~.n order ~a enaune awc eh~,2d~cen xhe needed ~.cna.ne,cae auppo~rx ~nam xhe~ panen~a, xhe 68~h Texab Leg.ca.2axune pabeed ~neao.2uti.ona de- e.~ahi.ng the man~lc a~ Augubx "Ch~i.2d Suppa~rx Man~h" ~.n Texaa; and G1H~R~AS, a.?.e e.%t%zen6 0~ the C-cty a~ La Pahxe ace wcged xa Jo~.n ~.n aeknouzeedg~.ng xhe a.cgvu.~.i,eance o~ "Ch.c,ed Suppalrx Month" xa emphad~.ze xhe ~.i.naneia.Q abpeet3 0~ panen~a,Z neapana.Lb.c.P.ity. NOGl, TH~R~1=0R~, I, VIRGINIA CLINF, Mayan a~ the C.%ty o~ La Porte, da hereby pnaePcum xhe month o~ Augubx, 1984, as CHID SUPPORT MONTH ~.n xhe C.c~y o ~ La Pante.. IN GlITN~SS wH~R~OF, I have heneuv-xo .ae~ my hand and eau.aed xhe Sean a~ the City xo be a~~~,xed hene~o, xh.%a the 15xh. day o~ Augua~, 1984. .cng ne, ayan